Orbit Post Sitemap
Walsh’s first Jackson Hole keynote comes as the Fed faces a tough trade-off: inflation remains above 2%, while jobless claims have fallen to 203,000. The key issue isn’t hawkish vs. dovish—it’s whether Walsh can establish a clear, reusable policy framework. Without one, markets may keep repricing Fed-Treasury dynamics, driving volatility across the dollar, Treasuries, gold, and Bitcoin.#WalshInflationRisk #BTCGoldCorrelation #SchwabExpandsCrypto Nine straight days of ETF inflows — but there’s more to the story. 👀
Last week, BTC ETFs pulled in $1.92B, while ETH ETFs added another $697M — their strongest run since October 2025.
Sounds bullish, right? 🔥
But here’s the catch: IBIT and ETHA are capturing roughly 70–80% of daily flows.
That means this might not be a broad institutional wave just yet.
BlackRock is doing a lot of the heavy lifting.
#DailyOrbit $CORE Many people misunderstand; the real bottleneck for CORE is not popularity, but liquidity depth
The flood of posts by external bloggers can bring short-term buying pulses, but it’s hard to solve a long-term problem: order book depth.
Recently, after observing multiple rounds of rallies followed by pullbacks, a very obvious phenomenon appears: during slight rises, buy orders come quickly; but once someone places a large sell order, the price shows significant slippage. This indicates that the market’s incremental volume is mostly retail sentiment-driven, and professional market makers’ deep positioning is not yet fully in place.
lstBTC’s liquidity itself is steadily improving, but the secondary market liquidity of the CORE token is a separate matter. Market makers usually enter on a large scale when one of two signals appears: either a major product is officially announced with a clear valuation anchor; or a large institutional asset manager explicitly states they are researching the ecosystem.
Popularity can spike overnight, but liquidity accumulation happens slowly over months and quarters.
So the current market easily experiences pulse-like surges followed by volatile pullbacks. It’s not that the project is weak, but the market depth isn’t thick enough yet. Rather than chasing every rally, a more valuable indicator to track is whether the slippage on large orders is consistently narrowing and whether the order book depth is genuinely improving.
$CORE#OKExPlanetYesterday (August 28, 2026), after Fed Chair Kevin Warsh delivered his Jackson Hole debut speech at the global central bank annual meeting, Bitcoin (BTC) and gold indeed experienced a rare simultaneous sharp decline. $BTC once fell to around $77,000, down more than 3.5% in 24 hours, and gold $XAU fell over 2% in the same time, once falling to around $4,500. I believe this decline is not due to gold's failure as a safe-haven aversion or a BTC trend reversal, but rather the market's repricing of interest rates. (1) Why did both assets fall together? Warsh's hawkish remarks quickly raised market expectations for continued Fed tightening. Several data points have already made the logic clear: • BTC: once fell to around $77,000, down over 3.5% in 24 hours
• Gold: At one point fell more than 2%, falling back to around $4,500
• U.S. Treasuries: 2-year yield rises to about 4.35%
• US Dollar: Strengthening in Sync So funds are trading as: rate hike expectations ↑ → US Treasury yields ↑ → USD ↑ → Real interest rates ↑ → BTC/Gold under pressure So the simultaneous decline actually shows that BTC and gold are sharing more and more macro liquidity pricing logic. (2) The market has actually already risen early. This was the key reason for yesterday's sell-off. Before Walsh's speech: BTC: 64,000 → $80,000 Gold: Breaking through $4,600 Both asset classes had already traded some "future liquidity improvements" in advanceWalsh’s first Jackson Hole keynote comes as the Fed faces a tough trade-off: inflation remains above 2%, while jobless claims have fallen to 203,000. The key issue isn’t hawkish vs. dovish—it’s whether Walsh can establish a clear, reusable policy framework. Without one, markets may keep repricing Fed-Treasury dynamics, driving volatility across the dollar, Treasuries, gold, and Bitcoin.
For analysis only, not investment advice. #WalshPolicyFramework
#WalshInflationRisk #BTCGoldCorrelation 📰 【Cai Wensheng: AI changes productivity, Web3 changes production relations, the most valuable asset in the future is data】
BlockBeats news, on August 29, at the "AI × New Finance—Innovation Global Tour Hong Kong Station and Yangtze River Stars Program Launch" event, angel investor and CAI Holdings chairman Cai Wensheng stated that AI essentially changes productivity, while Web3 is closer to changing production relations. He believes that if there is only efficiency improvement brought by AI without changes in finance and production relations, the new technology cycle still lacks an important link. Cai further judged that humanity is moving from an industrial society and information society into a data society, and the truly most valuable resource in the future will be data. For enterprises, AI should first be used to improve existing business and organizational efficiency, and then create new business models on this basis...
Every time Boss Cai speaks like this, insiders know that the old opportunist’s intuition is sharper than anyone else’s. When he says "data is the most valuable asset in the future," the statement itself is not new; what’s new is that he deliberately chose Hong Kong as the venue to say it—those who understand know it’s aimed at compliant funds and traditional capital.
Hearing this kind of talk often makes it clear that big players’ statements are often not to spread truth but to set the tone for the sector. What’s really worth paying attention to is the direction hidden behind the words—whether narratives like data circulation, privacy computing, and decentralized storage will be revived. Once narratives attract funding, activity will first appear on-chain, followed by various shell concepts and Meme projects emerging.
The most common mistake retail investors make is rushing into the secondary market to take over positions just because a big player says something. Data is indeed valuable, but what’s valuable is not that vapor project, but projects that can truly run business. At this stage, watch more and act less; wait for the liquidity inflection point.
What do you think—is this wave in the data sector pure narrative or is there something real? Which other on-chain projects are secretly working on data-related activities? Add clues in the comments below.👇👇👇
$BTC $ETH $XRP After breaking 77,000, everyone is asking: will it continue to fall? My judgment is: there is still short-term downward momentum, but the "bottoms" of the three major mainstream coins are not on the same dimension—their narrative logic is diverging sharply.
---
First, look at the looming threat: the September rate hike
Goldman Sachs says a rate hike in September is "extremely unlikely," but the market clearly isn't buying it. After Wash's speech, the rate hike expectation jumped directly from 35% to 50%-60%. Citadel predicts the Federal Reserve will take a more hawkish stance in 2026-2027. The rising rate hike expectations put direct pressure on non-yielding assets like Bitcoin, increasing holding costs, and funds may flow back from risk assets to short-term bonds. But HTX researchers point out a deeper logic: the valuation constraints on crypto assets are shifting from policy rates to long-term yields—meaning even if there is no rate hike in September, as long as long-term yields do not fall, the pressure remains. $SOL $ETH $BTC #沃什强调通胀风险，9月加息预期升温 #BTC高位多空拉锯，黄金联动增强 #嘉信理财拟新增SOL、AVAX与LINK Just said the bull market called hackers back to work, and today there was a harsh one: piggybacking on Trump to post a Meme, $GOLD plummeted 96% in 1 minute!
Today, Trump-related account realtrumpcoins suddenly promoted $GOLD, and many thought the "official concept" had arrived.
But a check on-chain showed: the developer holds 600 million tokens, and 15 new wallets took another 224.5 million tokens, totaling 82.45% of the total supply.
Then the promotional tweet was deleted, and $GOLD plummeted 96% in 1 minute.
The account also claimed to have profited $8.2 million from $GOLD — note, this is only their own statement and has not been independently verified.
The most important takeaway from this is:
A celebrity account is real, but that doesn't mean the coin they promote is real.
Next time you see a celebrity suddenly posting a Meme, don't rush in; first check the account, then check the token distribution.
$TRUMP Key focus: Warsh's hawkish signals | BTC ETF ends consecutive inflows | ETH/SOL relative strength | ZEC ETF cash-out | HYPE unlock | ENA buyback reform | AI chip collective differentiation | AVGO earnings report takes over Core analysis: • What Jackson Hole truly changed was not "whether rates will be cut in September," but the market restarting to price interest rate risk. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh continued to emphasize inflation targets and policy constraints in Jackson Hole's speech. After the speech, market expectations for a rate hike in September sharply rose, with the 2-year Treasury yield briefly rising rapidly and the 10-year yield returning to around 4.69%. On Friday, U.S. stocks showed clear divergence: the S&P 500 $SPY fell 0.25%, the Nasdaq $QQQ fell 0.52%, NVDA fell 4.6%, and MRVL plunged 10.3%. This shows that the market is no longer trading simply "whether AI demand is good," but whether AI assets can withstand higher discount rates. The same applies to crypto: previous BTC gains were driven by Treasury buybacks, ETF inflows, and short covering, but after the dollar and short-term interest rates rose again, BTC faced a real macro stress test for the first time. • BTC's structural changes deserve close attention: net ETF inflows were interrupted for nine consecutive trading days, BTC fell below $78,000, but ETH, XRP, and SOL were similar$CORE circulation jumped from 60.19% to 63.65% in just one day — a 3.46% increase. 👀 That means a significant amount of previously locked $CORE has entered the market, increasing the amount of tokens that can potentially be sold. The bigger question is: what will the project team do next? From my perspective, the project has repeatedly relied on a few familiar strategies: ① Unlock gradually, not all at once
Wait for $BTC to recover and market participants to expect a rebound, then distribute un$BTC failed to hold the 80,000 integer level this time, dropping directly to around 77,632 USD, down 2.62% in 24 hours. Wash's hawkish speech on Friday night pushed the probability of a September rate hike from 30% directly to 50%, the US dollar index surged to 99.68, and the 10-year bond yield reached 4.722%, both signals indicating tightening.
The two major off-exchange US dollar stablecoins remained steady, with 183 billion Tether plus 74 billion compliant US dollar stablecoins, totaling 257 billion USD, showing ample off-exchange ammunition. However, the BTC ETF channel dropped overnight from +179 million to -127 million, indicating institutions are pulling back first.
The greed index remains at 68, showing sentiment hasn't caught up with the price correction. Having lost the integer level this time, after retesting 80,000, first hold 77,000; if broken, then look for support around 75,000.🚨 Same Fed speech. Different damage. So why is ETH getting hit harder than BTC?
The Fed stayed hawkish, but the market reaction wasn’t equal.
$BTC dropped from $81,500 → $76,845, down about 4.7%.
$ETH fell from $2,566 → $2,403, losing around 6.3%.
That’s a 1.6 percentage-point gap — and it tells us something important about where capital is flowing.
The real story isn’t just the Fed.
It’s capital preference.
#DailyOrbit Application TVL on Robinhood Chain surpasses $1 billion, up by ~100% over the past month.
The leading applications by TVL consist of lending, spot, and perp DEXs$CORE is rarely discussed, but recently there have been three subtle fresh changes in CORE
Recently, most of the attention across the entire network has been focused on external bloggers collectively making calls, but many more subtle changes that have not yet been widely spread are actually more worth noting. Here is a summary of three fresh developments recently, none of which are official announcements, but come from on-chain traces, developer activities, and fragmented signals from overseas communities.
1. A new feature has appeared in lstBTC protocol revenue: the proportion of passively locked funds is rising
Previously, most of the funds in lstBTC were short-term arbitrage funds with high turnover rates. In the last 30 days, on-chain data shows a slight change: some lstBTC is no longer frequently redeemed but has shifted to long-term staking without movement. This is not large holders doing short-term swings but more like institutions testing long-term deposits. The individual amounts are not huge but there is a continuous small net inflow.
However, to clarify the boundary: this is only exploratory capital entering, not large-scale institutional positioning, still at a very small trial stage. Correspondingly, protocol fee income has slightly increased, but the growth rate is not explosive, more of a gentle climb.
Many in the community have directly interpreted this signal as "institutions massively entering," which is an overamplification; it only indicates that some institutions have started product testing.
2. SatPay no longer only focuses on full commercial launch; a mini pilot version has been split off for internal testing
Many are still waiting for the full Bitcoin debit card product to be officially announced and launched at once. However, the latest community developers reveal that the team’s approach has quietly changed.
The fully compliant version of SatPay is still slow in regulatory review in Europe and the US, making short-term launch difficult. The project team has now adjusted the pace to first release a functionally simplified closed beta: only enabling lstBTC self-repaying loans, temporarily cutting the debit card spending feature, to first run the lending module and complete risk control and clearing logic tests.
In other words, debit card spending will be postponed, and the lending function might come out earlier for small-scale internal testing. This is a subtle adjustment in the roadmap, and the official has not publicly announced this change.
3. Community heat shows stratification: top-tier influencers’ heat is waning, niche KOCs are quietly entering
This is the structural change happening in the widely discussed external call wave.
High-frequency calls from top-tier influencers like "All-in Brother" have started to decrease, while many BTC-Fi vertical micro-influencers with tens of thousands or thousands of followers have spontaneously begun deep dives into CORE technical documents, lstBTC mechanisms, and stablecoin concepts.
Unlike top influencers who directly shout target prices, these small and medium influencers rarely promote get-rich-quick slogans and focus more on technical and mechanism education.
An interesting contrast: top influencers bring short-term speculative traffic, while the new small KOCs bring precise users genuinely researching the BTC-Fi sector. But there is also risk: with many new influencers flooding in, it is inevitable that exaggerated interpretations and fabricated undisclosed benefits posts will appear, increasing information noise simultaneously.SOL: The 60 Billion Market Cap Leader Faces a "Smart Money Exodus," Is This Correction Just Beginning?
Solana ecosystem TVL hits a new high, MEME frenzy continues, yet SOL plunged 4.36% within 24 hours, falling below the $104 mark. While the market is still cheering the wealth effect of Pump.fun, smart money has quietly withdrawn.
With a market cap of $60.5 billion, daily volume of $212 million, and a turnover rate of only 0.35%, this liquidity indicator reveals a harsh reality: retail investors are buying at the top, while institutions are selling off in batches at lower levels. The $102-$110 trading range is the ideal price zone for major players to complete distribution.
The "complete silence" in social sentiment is most intriguing: absence from heat rankings, neutral long-short sentiment. The once Twitter-flooding SOL bulls have collectively gone silent—either they've seen the top or are trapped and afraid to speak. This "no cursing, no praising, no action" triple no-state often signals a continuation of the downtrend.
Smart money signals point to the core: net short positions, zero net holdings, zero active traders. Professional funds no longer provide liquidity market-making for SOL, meaning market makers see insufficient risk-reward. Without market makers supporting the price, any negative news could trigger a liquidity gap crash.
Core judgment: SOL is in a dangerous triangle of "strong fundamentals, poor token distribution, and dried-up liquidity." Losing the $100 psychological support will open the downside toward $85.With the same hawkish speech, $BTC dropped 4.7% and $ETH dropped 6.3%. Why is ETH weaker?
The core reason is a shift in capital preference. In this rebound, BTC rose 12.5% from 72458 to 81500, while ETH only rose 7% from 2400 to 2566, meaning ETH underperformed BTC. Institutional funds prioritize BTC when flowing back, marginalizing ETH.#WalshInflationRisk #BTCGoldCorrelation #SchwabExpandsCrypto According to Ajian's verification of the data updated by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on August 28, 78 institutions were approved for a total QDII quota of 6.84 billion USD. The foreign exchange authority's decision to release quotas during a period of market volatility is a strong signal, indicating that regulators are increasing their tolerance for capital outflows. At a time when domestic asset yields are declining, the continuous issuance of QDII quotas is the only compliant channel for private capital to seek global allocation.
For ordinary traders, attention can be paid to QDII funds with tight quotas, such as Southern and Dacheng. After the new quotas are issued, the premiums of these funds will decline, making it a good opportunity to enter global assets; for mature on-exchange traders, this quota also provides potential buying power for U.S. Treasury bonds. Ajian doesn't need to say more about what to do next.Distinguish genuine sector trends and avoid the "solo coin surge" trap
In a bull market, individual tokens often surge independently while other coins in the sector remain inactive. This is driven by isolated capital pumping, not sector rotation, and the effect is short-lived.
A true sector launch involves 2-4 core tokens within the sector rising in volume simultaneously, on-chain data improving in sync, and overall social discussion heating up. If only one coin is skyrocketing while others stay still, it’s a solo coin trend, carrying extremely high risk for chasing the peak.
Better to wait for sector resonance confirmation, earn a bit less, and exchange that for a higher margin of safety.
$BTC $ETH
#BTC高位多空拉锯，黄金联动增强
#嘉信理财拟新增SOL、AVAX与LINK
#马斯克回应大摩，3.5万亿美元营收或提前七年 Finally liquidated all $NEO spot holdings, invested about 5-6000 USD in total, ultimately took a loss of 975 USD and cut losses to exit. The logic for heavily investing in it at the time was optimism about founder Da's proposal Giveback II distributing 26 million NEO + 40 million GAS, with voting on the official website offering about 15.8% annualized GAS yield, but another founder Zhang opposed it and still controls tens of millions of NEO and GAS private keys. Several months have passed with no progress, the proposal is indefinitely delayed. Currently, the coin price is slowly declining with weak rebounds, trading volume is sparse, and the $GAS held by the top three official addresses is 70 million, showing a total supply of 67 million which is clearly inaccurate. The current $GAS price is still relatively strong, but how to resolve this selling pressure?August 2026 marks the 28th month since Bitcoin's halving. Bitcoin fell from $126,198 last October to $58,552 at the end of June this year, then rebounded to around $80,000. The market has restarted discussing that familiar question: Has the bottom appeared? The lows of the previous three bear markets appeared about 25.5 months, 29.2 months, and 30.3 months after the halving. According to historical templates, we have indeed entered the so-called "bottom window." This template has become the most commonly used framework for understanding Bitcoin: halving roughly every four years, then rising, then peaking, falling, and moving on to the next round. But here lie two different questions. One is why the protocol halves roughly every four years, and the other is why market prices also show a similar four-year rhythm. To discuss whether the four-year cycle still works, we need to look at these two things together. Four years written in the Bitcoin protocol: For every 210,000 blocks produced, the block subsidy is halved: 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, up to 3.125 BTC today. Calculated at an average of 10 minutes per block: 210,000 × 10 minutes = 1,458.33 days, about 3.995 years. At the end of 2010, developer Mike Hearn asked about the origins of parameters like 21 million coins and 10-minute block production. Satoshi didn't explain why each number was chosen this way, but instead provided a formula to show how they work together:First, this time the selling method is more covert. The team didn't use market price dumping. They put TRUMP into the Solana liquidity pool, so when others buy, it automatically converts to USDC. It doesn't look aggressive but has the same effect. The chips are converted into stablecoins, and the selling pressure is released into the market.#WalshInflationRisk #BTCGoldCorrelation #SchwabExpandsCrypto US short-term Treasury yields rise, mainly driven by the market repricing the possibility of Fed rate hikes.
On Friday, the 2-year Treasury yield rose 12 basis points to 4.35%, hitting a one-month high. Fed Chair Wash stated at the Jackson Hole symposium that if inflation does not fall back to the 2% target, the Fed will continue tightening measures, directly pushing up expectations for a rate hike in September. The current market probability expectation rose from 36% before the speech to 57%-60%.
Impact on assets is generally negative for risk assets:
✅ Stronger USD: Rising rate expectations increase the attractiveness of USD assets
❌ US stocks under pressure: High-valuation tech stocks are more sensitive to rate changes
❌ Cryptocurrencies weaken: Liquidity tightening expectations suppress BTC, ETH, and others
❌ Gold under pressure: Rising USD and real rates increase the opportunity cost of holding gold
❌ Treasury prices fall: Yield increases correspond to bond price declines
A notable feature of this market move is the pronounced rise in short-end yields, indicating the market is mainly trading on the Fed's policy turning hawkish and short-term rate increases, rather than purely trading long-term fiscal risks. $BTC $ETH $SOL #沃什强调通胀风险，9月加息预期升温 Wash's three sentences, 96,000 people liquidated
BTC dropped from 81,000 to 76,000, losing $4,000 overnight.
First sentence: The 2% inflation target is "firm and unwavering," and the Fed still has work to do until inflation falls to the target.
Second sentence: The current financial environment is difficult to define as "clearly restrictive," meaning it’s not tight enough yet, and there is still room for rate hikes.
Third sentence: The probability of a rate hike in September was 35% before the speech, and it surged directly to 60% after the speech.
What the market fears most is not rate hikes, but sudden changes in expectations.
In the past 24 hours, the entire network liquidated 470 million, with 96,000 people taken out. Long positions liquidated 360 million, accounting for 76%. BTC long positions liquidated 137 million, ETH long positions liquidated 80 million. The largest single liquidation was on Binance ETHUSDT, $11.66 million.
Bitcoin rose from 64,000 to 81,000 in two weeks, up 26%, then Wash spoke for 15 minutes and it went straight to zero.
Rising rate hike expectations — US Treasury yields rising — risk assets under pressure, this chain has been running for half a year, and BTC always takes the hit.
The rate hike probability jumped from 35% to 60%, the market is repricing. There is support around 77,000, but Wash has made it clear — inflation won’t stop until it’s below 2%. The essence of this adjustment is not "Bitcoin is failing," but a shift in macro logic. The short-term direction depends on ETF fund flows and whale behavior in the coming days. I won’t add positions below 80,000, waiting for sentiment to digest first.
Discuss in the comments, where do you think this wave will fall to? #Stripe consortium reportedly withdraws, PayPal plunges pre-market
Latest data
Market news shows that the consortium led by Stripe has withdrawn from the approximately $53 billion acquisition talks for PayPal, with PayPal falling more than 13% pre-market. Market prices: $BTC 77620, ETH 2428, SOL $103.2; the crypto market did not show significant correlation.
Market consensus
Many traders previously viewed this acquisition as an important signal for traditional payments entering the on-chain arena, expecting it to drive PYUSD and expand crypto payment scenarios; after the deal fell through, the corresponding optimistic expectations directly faded, and sentiment in the fintech sector weakened.
Underlying logic analysis
The termination of the acquisition is more a choice by the consortium after weighing valuation, financing conditions, and regulatory risks, rather than an issue with PayPal's crypto business itself. The narrative bonus disappears, but existing stablecoin and payment layouts will not stop because of this, only lacking a short-term catalyst to accelerate implementation.
Personal view (personally inclined to a gradual return of the bull market, just a personal opinion, not investment advice)
It's just a theme falling through, not a substantial negative. The big picture still depends on macro liquidity and spot capital flows; a single industry event is unlikely to change the medium- to long-term trend, so maintain your original position rhythm. 【Macro Turning Point | BTC Faces First Major Setback in This Bull Run】
BTC violently rebounded from 65,000 to surge to 81,000. After last Friday's hawkish speech at Jackson Hole, this marked the first major macro turning point in this rally.
During the speech, the market seemed stable, but it plunged 3,000 points immediately after, breaking below 77,000, with risk assets across the market collectively under pressure.
Key summary of the core logic this time:
1. The Fed does not acknowledge inflation cooling; favorable summer data is seen as an illusion, inflation remains high.
2. The 2% inflation target will not be compromised; the stance is to continue maintaining a tight policy.
3. Market pricing directly: the probability of a rate hike in September rose from 33% to 60%.
4. U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar rebounded simultaneously, liquidity expectations completely reversed.
The recent surge was supported by the Treasury suppressing yields and short-term easing benefits;
Now the Fed is tightening pricing again, economic data is strong, and there is absolutely no reason for easing.
✅Conclusion:
81,000 is basically the peak of this rebound phase,
The blind bull cycle is over, and next is a phase of macro pressure and high volatility consolidation.
Go with the trend, the market has changed, and your mindset must change accordingly.
#BTC #MacroMarket #JacksonHoleThe Treasury wants to use TGA to buy back long-term bonds, so the market will naturally be happy in the short term
But the more this sounds like "fixing a water pipe," the more we have to ask why the water keeps leaking. Buybacks can improve liquidity, can suppress long-term yields, and even give traders a breather; but they can't reduce the deficit, nor can they magically create new long-term buyers
This is the most awkward part of the current US Treasury market: the Treasury wants to lower financing costs, while the Fed wants to prove it is still serious about fighting inflation. One wants to ease bond market pressure, the other wants to tighten financial conditions, and the pricing signals get squeezed in the middle
If all problems are ultimately kept alive by technical operations, the market will slowly learn one thing: don't just look at yields, look at who is holding down the yields
#财政部拟用TGA回购，财政压力仍待化解 麻吉大哥，割肉了。 市场这波下跌后，他14小时前平掉了部分ETH多头仓位。一笔就亏了196万美元。 但这不是重点。 重点是，他手里现在还捏着4.1万枚ETH，价值约1亿美元。仍然是链上最大的ETH多头。 除了ETH，他手里还有7.5万枚$HYPE （约603万美元）和45枚$BTC （约350万美元）。 这次割肉有意思在哪？ 第一，这不是他第一次被ETH多头仓位搞得焦头烂额。8月11日，他一个25倍杠杆的ETH多单就遭过部分强平，当时平了约730枚ETH。往前翻，6月份他的ETH多单还浮盈过4500万美元，最后实亏了3400万。 第二，他为了补保证金，连Bored Ape都卖了。5年前85枚ETH买的猴子，只换回9枚ETH，亏了89.4%。把卖猴子的钱全数加仓ETH多单。 第三，他累计亏损已经超过8000万美元，甚至可能接近1亿美元。但还在扛。 所以现在问题很简单： $ETH 现在2,450美元附近晃悠，麻吉大哥手里4.1万枚ETH的多单成本在哪？没人知道。但一个累计亏了快1亿美金的人还在加仓，要么是他疯了，要么是他真的看到了什么。📊 TRUMP (Yellow Hair Coin) Effective Information Summary and Analysis:
Open Interest: Has been continuously rising since August 24, increasing from about 20 million to 38 million, nearly doubling, with a large accumulation of new positions.
Funding Rate: Recently alternating between positive and negative; there was a clear negative rate around August 24 (shorts paying longs), but the latest data has returned near the zero line, indicating a balanced battle between bulls and bears.
Active Buy/Sell Volume: Since August 24, active buying volume has dominated, with continuous accumulation by buyers, though the gap between buying and selling has recently narrowed.
Long/Short Account Ratio: The proportion of long accounts is significantly higher, showing market sentiment leaning bullish.
Candlestick Trend: TRUMP price is consolidating around 2.75, with resistance at 3.12 above and support at 2.73 below, currently in a short-term range-bound oscillation.
---
🧠 Core Judgement
Open interest doubled but price did not break through, indicating many new longs are trapped at the current level; funding rate returning to zero suggests bulls are no longer willing to pay a premium; marginal weakening in active buying volume shows declining buying support.
Directional Judgement: In the short term, expect a rally above 3.0 to lure more chasing funds, then combined with high concentration of long positions, a washout and drop will occur.
Recommendation: Do not chase longs at the current level; wait for price to rise to the 3.1–3.2 resistance zone to take profits in batches or open shorts, with stop loss set above 3.3. If price breaks below 2.73 directly, it indicates the main force chooses to push down decisively—follow decisively.
$TRUMP Elon Musk is boasting again with a bold call—SpaceX to reach $3.5 trillion in annual revenue in 7 years? Why this sounds more like a “market cap narrative”
Morgan Stanley predicts SpaceX’s annual revenue will hit $3.5 trillion by 2040, but Musk claims it can be achieved early by 2033 (7 years from now).
Currently, SpaceX’s annual revenue is under $20 billion. To surge to $3.5 trillion in 7 years (equivalent to over 10% of the current entire US GDP), it would require a compound annual growth rate exceeding 90%, nearly a 190-fold increase.
This already breaks conventional business logic?
The total global commercial launch plus communications market capacity is currently less than $2 trillion. Even if SpaceX monopolizes 100% of the entire industry, it still can’t reach $3.5 trillion.
To achieve this, three extreme assumptions must be met:
· Routine Starship operations: launch costs pushed to the limit, officially replacing traditional intercontinental aviation and high-end logistics.
· Orbital space AI computing power: deployment of tens of thousands of compute satellites, becoming the world’s largest space cloud data center.
· Global infrastructure monopoly: direct satellite-to-phone connections fully taking over billions of terminals and smart devices’ underlying communications.
The $3.5 trillion revenue figure seems more like Musk’s “visionary slogan” to break the secondary market ceiling and forcibly tie in the trillion-dollar AI concept. Achieving $100 billion to $300 billion within 7 years would already be a commercial miracle; the $3.5 trillion slogan is just a con 🤡!
#马斯克回应大摩，3.5万亿美元营收或提前七年 Fundamental Research Report $FLOW / Flow (Public Chain/L1) $3.20
Straight to the point: Flow ($FLOW) comprehensive score 55/100, rating narrative outweighs implementation. Breaking down the three layers: the company team has cash reserves, the protocol network shows signs of paid usage, token value transmission still needs observation.
Project Overview: Flow (token $FLOW), public chain/L1 track. Focused on NFT dedicated chain, NBA collaboration. Competitors include ETH, SOL. Traditional enterprise collaboration relies on cloud servers and contract reconciliation; during high concurrency, gas fees spike, TPS is limited, and cross-chain bridge security incidents are frequent. Public chains use a unified state machine for trustless settlement, reducing reconciliation costs. Customer unit price $50-500/month, requires USDC or fiat settlement. Narrative-driven track, usage drops 60-80% in bear markets. Positioned as an end-to-end vertical platform. Product implementation: protocol layer officially running, on-chain dashboard shows protocol fees accumulating, with signs of paid usage. Latest version not found, 60 valid commits in the last 90 days.
User side: address MAU not disclosed, DAU not disclosed, 24h transaction volume $80.00M, TVL not found. Wallet addresses do not equal natural person monthly active users; large addresses concentrated holdings may overestimate real user count. Revenue side: user fees not disclosed, supplier income about 80-90% of user fees (belonging to LPs and nodes), protocol treasury income $3.6K, token holder buyback and burn annualized no burn mechanism. 24h transaction volume is business flow, not revenue. Company profit does not equal protocol profit, protocol profit does not equal token holder profit. Code side: 60 valid commits in 90 days, 25 active contributors, latest version not found. GitHub is grade A evidence for direct verification. Investment background: company equity financing checked via PitchBook/Crunchbase (grade A), token private and public sales checked via whitepaper, release schedule, and on-chain unlock contracts (grade A), market makers and ecosystem funding are grade B, not representing long-term holdings by tech VCs, technical integration checked via API/SDK access evidence (grade B), strategic partnerships and logo wall are grade D. NVIDIA GPU usage does not equal NVIDIA investment, exchange listing does not equal exchange strategic investment.
Token side: total supply 1,300,000,000, circulating 950,000,000 (73.1%), FDV $4.20B, next unlock 2026-Q4 (accounts for +3.50% of circulation), annualized burn and buyback no clear mechanism. Must buy tokens to use the product? Yes, strong value capture (Gas/staking/service access). Compared with peers (uniform criteria, no cross-track comparison): circulating market cap, Flow $3.00B, ETH undisclosed, SOL undisclosed. FDV: Flow $4.20B, ETH undisclosed, SOL undisclosed. Annual revenue: Flow $3.6K, ETH undisclosed, SOL undisclosed. Monthly active addresses or users: Flow undisclosed, ETH undisclosed, SOL undisclosed. Figures based on public data snapshots, some missing data supplemented by official reports or industry standards. Valuation: circulating market cap $3.00B, FDV $4.20B, P/S 821,917.8x, FDV divided by revenue 1,150,684.9x. Pessimistic view discounts $3.00B by 50-70%, neutral range oscillates, optimistic expects revenue doubling, burn implementation, enterprise clients entering, FDV P/S aligns with top players. Final qualitative assessment: fundamentals solid (score 55/100). Token value transmission path unclear, only governance incentives. Circulating market cap relatively expensive compared to fundamentals, overdrawn expectations, FDV moderate. Main risks: short-term large unlock dumping, protocol income long-term zero, token demand relies only on incentives (if incentives stop, usage collapses). Tracking indicators: weekly protocol fees, burn amount, active address retention, TVL/loan balance, GitHub version releases. Public data inference, not investment advice. Conclusions invalid if core indicators change by more than 30%.
This concludes this issue of the research report. If you find it useful, please follow.
#FundamentalResearchReport #Crypto #Research #OKXOrbitWhy Does Bitcoin Rise?
⚠️ Market review only, not investment advice; the crypto market is highly volatile.
The factors can be divided into six layers: supply side, demand side, macro liquidity, regulatory expectations, chip and leverage, and narrative belief.
1. Supply Side: Scarcity, Four-Year Halving (Fundamental Basis)
Total permanent cap of 21 million coins, no additional issuance.
Every 4 years, the block reward halves, cutting miners' daily new Bitcoin output in half, reducing new selling pressure in the market.
- Historical pattern: The market often trades ahead of halving expectations; major tops mostly appear 12-18 months after halving.
- Current status: 94% of Bitcoin has been mined, with fewer new coins entering circulation; a large amount of coins remain dormant long-term (whales hoarding, cold wallets), reducing liquid supply on exchanges, so small amounts of capital can push prices up.
2. Demand Side: Real Buying Pressure, Institutions Are the Biggest Variable This Cycle
1. US Spot ETFs
BlackRock and other ETFs provide pension funds, family offices, and ordinary Americans a compliant channel to buy BTC; continuous net inflows into ETFs represent ongoing passive buying and are the most important indicator of the mid-term trend.
2. Public Companies Hoarding Coins (e.g., MicroStrategy)
Companies convert part of their cash into Bitcoin on their balance sheets, continuously buying and directly absorbing circulating supply.
3. Global Retail and High Net Worth Allocation
Treat Bitcoin as "digital gold" to hedge fiat overissuance and geopolitical risks.
3. Macro Liquidity (Most Impactful, Primary Short-Term Driver)
Bitcoin is a highly elastic risk asset, very sensitive to US dollar liquidity.
1. Fed rate cut expectations and declining US Treasury yields
Lower risk-free interest rates cause funds to flow out of bonds into stocks and risk assets like Bitcoin; when Treasury yields surge, Bitcoin usually comes under pressure.
2. Weakening US dollar makes Bitcoin priced in dollars more likely to rise.
Simply put: In a loose liquidity environment, Bitcoin is more likely to bull; when liquidity tightens, even strong narratives are easily suppressed.
4. Regulatory Policy Expectations
- Positive: Clear crypto legislation in the US, softer SEC stance, ETF approvals, more countries allowing compliant holdings, opening space for incremental capital inflows.
- Negative: Total bans and strict regulations directly suppress the market.
A large part of the bull market is trading on "expectations of improved regulation."
5. Chip Structure + Leverage Short Squeeze (Short-Term Surge Catalyst)
1. Long-term holders on-chain do not move: large amounts of BTC locked in cold wallets, not selling, shrinking circulating supply.
2. Derivatives leverage: When price breaks key resistance, massive short positions get forcibly liquidated; shorts buying coins to close positions become passive buyers, further driving prices up—this is a short squeeze. Many rapid big green candles come from leverage liquidations, not all from spot buying.
6. Narrative Belief: Value Consensus
Two core narratives:
1. Inflation resistance, hedge against fiat depreciation: governments can print money, but Bitcoin’s total supply cannot be changed.
2. Decentralized digital value storage, not controlled by any single country.
The narrative itself doesn’t directly push prices up but attracts capital willing to allocate, turning the story into real money.
Conversely, what can interrupt the rise?
1. Fed hikes rates again, liquidity tightens; US Treasury yields keep rising.
2. ETFs shift from net inflows to sustained large redemptions, institutional funds withdraw.
3. Global economic crisis, all risk assets crash together.
4. Major negative regulatory news.
5. Excessive leverage buildup followed by concentrated long liquidations causing a crash.
In summary:
Halving tightens supply as the foundation; macro liquidity determines the overall environment; ETFs and institutional funds provide incremental buying; regulation opens institutional space; leverage and sentiment amplify price swings.
Looking at a single factor alone leads to misjudgment; multiple factors must resonate together to produce a major bull market.Bitcoin Quietly Ties to Gold: A New Capital Shift Amid High-Level Long-Short Tug-of-War
BTC is repeatedly tugging at historical highs, and the market is showing a meaningful change.
Although spot ETFs continue to see net inflows, profit-taking and options hedging are simultaneously surging. More importantly, BTC's correlation with the US Nasdaq is weakening, while it is increasingly in sync with gold, which keeps hitting new highs.
This indicates a fundamental shift in institutional allocation logic. In the past, BTC was treated as a high-beta risk asset—rising with liquidity easing and falling with tightening; but against the backdrop of sovereign debt expansion and fiat currency credit dilution, long-term large funds are positioning it alongside gold as a non-credit asset base.
However, short-term trends remain constrained by derivatives. A large volume of options positions accumulates at key price levels, and market makers' delta hedging intensifies the volatility and shakeouts. Any apparent breakout or breakdown patterns are mostly battles over existing contract positions.
At this stage, pairing BTC with gold as a hedging combination, combining gold's defensive baseline with BTC's liquidity flexibility, better withstands macroeconomic fluctuations than betting on either alone.
Do you think BTC and gold strengthening in sync indicates increased demand for safe havens, or does it reflect a fundamental shift in institutional long-term allocation?
#BTC高位多空拉锯，黄金联动增强 $MSTRSTRATE current price 127.39, down 6.55% in 24h, US stock market closed for the weekend. The underlying stock closed down 7.34% yesterday, the token only followed the decline without discount, this resilience is worth discussing.
📰 News: Canaccord upgraded the rating combined with Strategy turning profitable, but the underlying stock still closed down 7.34% yesterday, clearly profit-taking despite the good news.
🔧 Technical: RSI14 at 73.1 overbought, MACD golden cross with shrinking red bars but no death cross, MA7/MA25 bullish alignment still intact, this looks more like a high-level consolidation.
🌍 Macro: Nasdaq 100 tokens only down 0.25%, US stock market closed for the weekend, overall risk appetite not collapsed, MSTRSTRATE's decline is more about its own profit-taking.
🎯 Today's view: I tend to be optimistic, the core is that the underlying stock's news supports profitability, the token did not fall into discount, and the technicals have not broken the bullish structure.
📊 Token 127.39 (-6.55%) | Underlying stock 127.31 (-7.34%) | Premium +0.06% | US stock market closed for the weekend
💎 Summary: Follow RSI to see if it cools down quickly and changes in underlying stock premium, high-level volatility will be significant.
#USStockTokens
#MSTR
#BitcoinConceptStocks After WASH's speech ended, the probability of a rate hike in September rose to 61%. On the 28th, the on-chain inflow to exchanges aggregated to +4556 coins. The ETF ended a continuous 9-day net inflow, and the options structure for the 31st settlement is high GEX, with a put wall at 78500.
Today, ignoring AI, if Bitcoin's price falls below 77500 (1H close), it will quickly drop toward 75000, with support around 73700 below.
Currently, the probability of a September rate hike is very high; at least two hikes are expected, though not necessarily consecutively. There is a strong possibility of another hike in December. Unless inflation falls rapidly, ruling out a December hike is unlikely.
The September rate hike somewhat alleviates the threat of yen carry trade liquidations.
The main focus now is oil prices; oil must fall below 75 to help ease inflation.
There are midterm elections in November, and what new surprises Trump might bring is unknown.
September is not easy to trade—short positions are difficult, and long positions even more so. 这一次的上涨，我不认为只是简单的超跌反弹。市场结构已经明显改善，但想要彻底确认中期趋势反转，还需要完成两个关键动作：回踩不能破坏结构 + 突破关键前高压力。 目前周线形态正在变得更强，价格重新站回多条核心均线之上，短中期均线开始形成支撑，周线MACD也出现低位金叉，动能柱持续扩张，说明多头力量正在重新回归。 但问题同样明显——短线已经有些过热。 RSI短周期指标已经进入高位区域，KDJ也接近极端水平。这个阶段如果继续连续拉升，追涨的性价比反而越来越低。相比直接冲高，我更希望看到一次震荡或者回踩，让前期获利盘和套牢盘完成换手。 更重要的是，宏观环境并没有完全转向。 美股科技板块近期出现回落，美债收益率仍然维持高位，美元指数也出现反弹，市场对于美联储后续政策路径的重新定价，依然可能给风险资产带来短期压力。 所以接下来，我主要观察三个剧本： ① 守住7.45万—7.65万美元 属于强势横盘，只要支撑有效，消化完超买之后，BTC仍有机会再次挑战8.3万—8.6万美元区域。 ② 回踩7.05万—7.25万美元后企稳 这反而是我认为更健康的走势。突破之后重新测试关键支撑，如果买盘能够接住，说明这次The Solana deflation proposal just passed, and institutions are frantically buying in. I've seen this script before.
The Solana community just did something big — the SGP-0002 "Double Deflation" proposal passed by a narrow 67% margin. The annual inflation reduction rate doubled from 15% to 30%, cutting 18.9 million SOL issuance over the next six years. Kraken and Galaxy Digital changed their votes at the last minute to help push it over the threshold. The deflation direction is set, but the community remains divided.
Institutions don’t care about these debates; they are already aggressively accumulating. Charles Schwab announced adding $SOL, $AVAX, and $LINK. Bitwise’s Solana staking ETF surpassed $1 billion in assets, and Goldman Sachs is the largest holder of the SOL spot ETF, with nearly $90 million in holdings.
On one hand, supply is deflating; on the other, institutions are entering. This is no coincidence — the supply-demand relationship is being systemically reshaped.
But don’t overlook security. Solana’s new bank Avici was just hacked, losing over $1 million. Every security incident causes short-term capital flight.
My judgment: The mid-term logic of deflation plus institutional adoption remains unchanged. SOL holding above 100 will gradually reflect the deflation premium. Long-term, supply reduction plus demand growth; short-term, watch for security risks.
#嘉信理财拟新增SOL、AVAX与LINK
#Solana通胀缩减提案获投票通过 #马斯克回应大摩，3.5万亿美元营收或提前七年
Elon Musk is once again correcting Wall Street.
Morgan Stanley released a research report saying SpaceX could reach $3.5 trillion in annual revenue by 2040. Morgan Stanley also gave an overweight rating and a $300 target price.
Musk directly replied on X — I personally estimate that $3.5 trillion could be achieved around 2033.
Seven years earlier. The tone is outrageously confident. He also predicted reaching $1 trillion by 2030, and now he’s directly jumping to $3.5 trillion, taking bigger and bigger steps.
The difference between these two isn’t just numbers, it’s the commercialization speed of Starship.
Morgan Stanley’s model is already quite aggressive, based on two launches per day per launch pad, 5,800 Starship launches per year by 2040, requiring only 8 launch pads. SpaceX’s new base in Louisiana plans for 15 launch pads. That means even if the new base isn’t fully built, SpaceX can still meet Morgan Stanley’s 2040 expectations.
But Musk believes even the goals he set for himself are underestimated. The gap between Wall Street and Musk isn’t just seven years, it’s two completely different narrative logics. One looks at the number of launch pads and launch frequency, the other sees Starship, Starlink, and AI computing power integrated into one infrastructure.
What do you think?
$BTC $ETH September could be a crucial turning point for the Bitcoin market.
My judgment is not that September will definitely see a decline, but after the earlier rise, the beginning of September may still be driven by positive factors; by mid to late September, we need to be cautious of positive news being priced in and a market pullback.
I am focusing on three key events:
1. September 8 U.S. Treasury repo operations, where liquidity release might support Bitcoin.
2. September 15 Clarity crypto bill vote. The market might rally in advance, but after the news is finalized, there could be a "buy the rumor, sell the fact" reaction.
3. September 16 Federal Reserve meeting. No rate hike is already expected; if the outcome meets expectations, the positive effect might be priced in early.
Historically, September tends to be a relatively weak month for Bitcoin, especially after a rapid rise in August, making mid to late September more prone to pullbacks.
From a technical perspective, I will watch whether the resistance above can be effectively broken: if not, the market might form a double top and decline; if it breaks above the previous high with volume, then follow the momentum.
Therefore, it is currently not recommended to chase highs near resistance levels. A safer approach is to wait for a pullback to stabilize or wait for a genuine breakout before deciding.
Assets like $SOL and $CRCL, although driven by themes and capital, are more volatile and risks should not be ignored just because of price increases.
Next, I will closely observe market reactions around September 15-16 and whether institutional funds continue to flow in. Ultimately, how the market moves will depend on the answers given by price and capital. #沃什强调通胀风险，9月加息预期升温 Today the market finally started to cool down. BTC was still hovering above 80,000 yesterday, but after Jackson Hole's speech, it was directly hammered below 77,000, and now it has pulled back to around 77,000. ETH returned to about $2,430, SOL is near $103, and XRP also dropped to around $1.38, basically all retracing along with the big coin.
The reason for this decline is actually quite straightforward: Federal Reserve Chair Warsh's speech was hawkish, meaning that if inflation can't be brought down, interest rates may continue to rise. The market's expectation for a rate hike in September has jumped from about 35% to nearly 60%, with the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields strengthening together, so the crypto market naturally took a hit first.
Another point worth watching is that BTC spot ETFs had inflows for 9 consecutive days earlier, but preliminary data yesterday showed a possible net outflow of about $106 million. Now, there's no rush to judge the end of the market trend; the previous rise was too fast, so a pullback is normal. The main focus next is whether the 77,000 level can hold. If it holds, this structure remains intact; if not, it's not too late to look lower.
#BTC #比特币 #ETH #SOL #MSTR再卖1638枚比特币，规模腰斩 The key lesson from Avici and Moonwell is that "onchain" does not mean every layer shares the chain's security profile. Avici said a vulnerable card-balance contract at partner Rain affected 1,685 users and about $500.9K, while self-custody wallets and Solana mainnet were unaffected and balances will be reimbursed. Moonwell's earlier ~$8.7M loss involved low-liquidity MAMO price manipulation.
Trust will increasingly depend on how apps manage the weakest link: contract isolation, oracle design, asset screening, exposure limits and credible compensation. Audits matter, but bounded failure may prove just as important as prevention.
#OnchainAppRisksNew York silver futures fell 3%, which is just a normal "pressure release" after the previous overheating, and the trend reversal has not yet occurred!
$XAG silver once surged above $70, with an accumulated increase of over 20% in August, clearly outperforming gold in the short term; now there is a single-day pullback of 3%, mostly profit-taking at high levels. More importantly, silver's cumulative increase over the past year has exceeded 70%, indicating a very thick profit buffer for trend funds, so the pullback will naturally be more intense.
But this decline also reveals one issue: $70 has started to become a dense chip area. If there is a continuous volume-increasing decline afterward, especially breaking below the previous breakout zone, silver's high-level momentum trading will significantly cool down.
The real beneficiaries are downstream silver industrial enterprises, especially high-consumption sectors like photovoltaics and electronics—the silver price drop directly reduces raw material costs.
I remain optimistic about silver in the medium to long term, but am more cautious in the short term. Gold's defensive attributes are more stable than silver, and $BTC depends on liquidity. Currently, it is not recommended to chase silver mining companies; wait until the silver price returns above $70 or stabilizes with reduced volume after a pullback before reconsidering. It is worth watching now, but not a position for blind bottom-fishing. TRUMP at $2.7, do you dare to chase?
First, look at the surface: it rebounded from 1.37 to 3.07, doubling.
It bottomed between 1.37-1.50 in mid-August, then instantly surged to 3.64 on 8/22. Although it pulled back, the weekly chart shows a 48% gain and the monthly chart an 88% gain. Volume broke through the 2.05 bear market resistance, standing above EMA20/50, with the weekly chart showing higher lows — the mid-term trend has reversed. But RSI at 73 is overbought, Bollinger upper band pierced, and the team is selling coins.
First thing: the team is selling coins, but the market seems indifferent.
In the past 48 hours, the project wallet swapped TRUMP for 3.38 million USDC, sent 646,000 coins to OKX, and transferred another 2.62 million coins (about $6.2 million). The market interprets this as "insiders cashing out."
But the unlock is not over; on September 18, another 28.7 million coins will be given to insiders, with about 900,000 coins released linearly every day.
Retail investors are shouting "MAGA to the moon," while the team calmly unloads.
Second thing: the supply structure is terrible, and this is TRUMP's ceiling.
Total supply is 1 billion, with only 200-250 million (20-25%) circulating. The creator/CIC Digital-related pools hold a very high proportion, with unlocks continuing until the end of 2027.
If you buy 1 TRUMP now, there are 4 more waiting to be unlocked and dumped behind it.
900,000 new coins enter the market daily, equivalent to over $2 million in daily selling pressure.
The batch of 28.7 million coins on September 18 is about 4% of the market cap at current price, released all at once.
Third thing: technical indicators show divergence signals.
Bullish side:
Volume breakout above 2.05 bear market resistance, higher lows on weekly chart
Above EMA20/50 (around 1.8-2.0), 20-week EMA at about 2.21 becomes new support
ADX around 43, indicating strong trend strength
Bearish side:
RSI at 73 overbought, StochRSI/CCI generally overheated
Today pierced Bollinger upper band 2.80-2.93 then pulled back, long upper shadow
200-day moving average around 2.36-2.71 is a contested zone
Today's high at 3.07 already hit resistance once
Resistance above: 2.80-2.93 → 3.07-3.11 (today's high) → 3.38-3.67 (8/22 long shadow)
Support below: 2.50-2.55 → 2.21-2.30 (20-week EMA) → 2.05 (bear market resistance turned support)
Trading strategy
Short-term traders:
If it rebounds to 2.88-3.05 with 15m/1h bearish divergence, reduce longs or lightly short, target 2.70-2.55, stop loss at 3.12, do high sell and low buy around 2.7.
Swing traders:
Wait for a pullback to 2.52-2.58 with volume contraction and stabilization, or 2.28-2.35 to confirm support, then go long. Targets at 2.90-3.10-3.60. Stop loss structure at 2.18 or below 2.03.
When to switch to offense?
When the daily chart firmly holds above 3.11 with volume support and pullback does not break 2.80 — only then can targets be set to 3.67/4.4+.
Risk control is more important than direction (September 18 is the real test)
If there is another on-chain alert of "team wallet entering exchange/swapping stablecoins," prioritize reducing positions, don’t make stories. 7-10 days before the September 18 unlock, reduce leverage and overnight exposure. Insider chips will be priced in advance.
If BTC breaks recent lows with volume, TRUMP will likely follow the sell-off — watch the market first, then MAGA.
TRUMP’s current movement is very similar to PEPE in 2025 —
99% of people see "doubled" and chase in, only to be dumped back to the starting point by insider unlocks. But 1% buy below 2.5 and reduce above 3.0, repeating this three times.
It’s not that TRUMP is bad, it’s that you mistake every rebound for a reversal and every sell-off for a pump.
What is your TRUMP cost?
At 2.7, do you chase or not?
$BTC $ETH $TRUMP Hyperliquid: $1.2 Billion Unlock Cap, Can Buybacks and Compliance Hold Up?
Today Hyperliquid faces its largest monthly unlock ever: about 14.18 million $HYPE tokens, worth approximately $1.1-1.2 billion at current prices, accounting for 1.4% of total supply. Just three days ago (8/26), HYPE hit a new all-time high of $83.5, now retreating to around $80.
Two opposing forces clash:
Bear side: The unlock floods the market, coinciding with a decline in overall market risk appetite, creating real short-term selling pressure;
Bull side: The CFTC is pushing for Hyperliquid’s compliance to enter the US market, with Trump publicly mentioning this;
The AQAv2 mechanism will use USDC reserve yields for automatic HYPE buybacks and burns, starting in October — this is structural buying.
My view: HYPE is one of the few tokens in DeFi currently with "real cash flow + regulatory entry ticket expectations." The unlock-induced pullback is a test for long-term capital, not the end.
Watch two indicators: the on-chain flow of unlocked tokens, and the actual burn volume after buybacks start in October. Let the data speak to the strength of the logic.
Risk warning: The valuation supported by $14 million daily revenue is not cheap; if the compliance process changes, the logic will be hit harder than the valuation.Bitcoin's upward momentum weakens—can it continue to rise? In terms of upward momentum, Bitcoin's recent surge is the result of multiple factors resonating with "ETF funds returning + improved macro liquidity expectations + short squeeze + technical breakthrough." But now, these upward momentum is gradually weakening. Walsh's hawkish speech at the Jackson Hole global central bank annual meeting raised the probability of a rate hike in September from about 35% to around 60%, significantly cooling market expectations for subsequent liquidity improvement. Bitcoin spot ETFs had seen net inflows for nine consecutive trading days, but after August 19 and 20, the scale of daily net inflows gradually declined, with about $202 million in net outflows on August 28, ending a streak of net inflows. This means marginal buying interest in ETFs is weakening, and the market has even started to turn into net outflows. Meanwhile, the short squeeze formed during the August 19–21 rally has clearly weakened, and the upward momentum from the short squeeze is also declining. Overall, the momentum driving Bitcoin's continued rise is clearly weakening. Meanwhile, Bitcoin has also shown multiple negative signals: From the volume-price relationship perspective: After a series of consecutive volume-price divergences, yesterday's declining volume has already surpassed the rising volume on August 27 and 28, indicating increasing selling pressure. From the funding perspective: Bitcoin spot funds have seen net outflows for three consecutive days, increasing day by day, reaching $205 million yesterday, indicating short-term profit-taking pressurea deep ETH drop can force Hyperliquid to liquidate the 38k ETH longs wallet by wallet and send sell orders into its book. after Warsh spoke, rate hike odds rose from about 35% to 56% and BTC fell 3.3%. those longs are 5.03% of Hyperliquid ETH OI versus 0.41% across exchanges.#DailyIdeally, place a long order around 75500, push for successive highs, then continue with a volatile pullback. The ideal target is to take profit at 78600, then decide the short entry point based on the pattern.
Not optimistic about a bull rebound.
Worth mentioning:
At Jackson Hole, Walsh still donned the hawkish stance, emphasizing the weight of inflation under his administration. Using verbal expectation management to cool down an overheated economy is undoubtedly the lowest-cost "interest rate control."
The Federal Reserve is not in a position to truly raise rates.
The Federal Reserve also currently lacks the ability to cut rates.
The real interest rate is stuck at the current level.
For the US to fight recession and achieve a soft economic landing, the primary core remains the strength of the dollar and visible sustained economic growth.
The former requires more stable US Treasury yields, the latter requires AI to continue driving and genuinely improve productivity, benefiting the consumer side.
US interest rates will not change in September, Japan will raise rates, and carry trades will cool down. But the cooling of Fed rate hike expectations will offset some of the pricing logic decline in rate cut expectations.
Of course, if August CPI falls, the highest risk pricing of rate cut expectations will still appear.
Regarding BTC's trend, there's not much to say. Macro-wise, aside from liquidity as the most micro macro condition, the biggest gray rhino is the midterm elections landing.
No matter who wins, red or blue, it is the biggest test for risk assets.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#沃什强调通胀风险，9月加息预期升温 #Anthropic: IPO New Progress, Prospectus Planned for September Release
The leader has something to say
Holding the ZEC short position all along, entered at 830, now the price is around 790, with over 40 points of floating profit. The timing from entry to now has been steady.
Core logic unchanged
Previously analyzed the drivers behind ZEC's surge: Grayscale ETF expectations plus Ironwood upgrade fixing vulnerabilities pushed ZEC from 250 to 859. Now the ETF has launched, with a first-day trading volume of $14.8 million, not bad but not strong either. After the positive news is realized, the price needs new support to maintain the high level.
Barry Silbert compared ZEC to Bitcoin in 2013; take that with a grain of salt. The Grayscale founder backing his own product is logical, but sustained net inflows into the ETF are the real buying support, which we have yet to see.
Why continue holding the short position
First, lack of new catalysts after ETF launch. The core driver of ZEC's rise was ETF expectations, now fulfilled. The market needs to see continuous net inflow data to push prices higher. The first-day $14.8 million volume is decent but insufficient to support a market cap of over 10 billion for sustained growth.
Second, technicals are weakening. ZEC has fallen back from the 859 high, with clear resistance above. Daily candles are consecutively bearish, short-term bullish structure is eroding. The 830 level is at the end of a short squeeze rally, inherently a high-probability short zone.
Third, the long-term structural issues in the privacy coin sector remain. Regulatory frameworks for privacy assets will only become stricter. ZCash's technical upgrade fixed vulnerabilities but did not change privacy coins' marginal status in mainstream finance.
Operation plan
Continue holding the short position, move stop loss up to 860 to break even, let profits run. Target area is 600 to 650. If ZEC can hold above 850, indicating ETF buying is stronger than expected, then consider taking profits and exiting. Control position size well, do not hold through excessive risk. $BTC $ETH $SOL
On the market, Bitcoin is oscillating near 78,500, Ethereum around 2,470. Wash's speech gave no direction, rate hike expectations slightly warming, short-term risk assets under pressure. All longs have been closed waiting for a pullback, no rush to bet on direction.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; stop losses must be set on positions. Good luck.In-depth logical analysis of Walsh — September rate hike probability soars to 58%? With such poor data, what can they raise! Understanding the Fed's “verbal smokescreen”
Walsh's speech at Jackson Hole about “inflation not meeting the target, financial conditions not tight enough” scared the September rate hike probability from 35% up to nearly 58%, pushing the 2-year US Treasury yield to 4.35%, and the market followed with a pullback. But thinking calmly: with such poor real data, what can the Fed raise?
1. Exposing the three major flaws of the “rate hike expectation”
The real economy has cooled: Chicago PMI plummeted to 47.1, below the boom-bust line. Employment was sharply revised down by 79,000, with underlying data inflated. Inflation expectations actually fell to 4.0%, below the expected 4.4%. Walsh is merely “expectation management,” shouting threats but holding no bullets.
2. Full probability pricing is actually a turning point
The financial market trades on “expectation gaps.” When the September rate hike is priced near 60%, panic selling has already been fully vented. Triple negative factors combined (extreme hawkishness + $6.44 billion delivery + gold and silver plunge), BTC still firmly holds $77,000, ETH holds $2,400, indicating very strong spot support below, making it hard to push prices down.
3. Core conclusions and targets
After panic sentiment clears, a golden pit appears
$BTC: defend 76,500-77,000, target 84,000 after reclaiming 80,000
$ETH: bottoming at 2,400, expect catch-up rise to 2,800
Don't be scared by 58% to give up your chips; wait for clearing over the weekend, Monday's rebound will only be stronger.
#沃什强调通胀风险，9月加息预期升温 I can't even remember how many times I've praised ETH in this market wave. Yesterday, the $BTC ETF ended nine consecutive days of inflows. Of course, this is just a short-term cooling signal, not proof that long-term demand has disappeared. It could be a rotation between products or a risk rebalancing after macro speeches; on the other hand, the $ETH ETF continued to maintain inflows for the 10th trading day. Despite a slight 24h decline, ETF buying can naturally decouple from short-term price performance.
Moreover, whales and institutions have recently bought over $1B ETH, and exchange ETH reserves have dropped to about 14.93M ETH. This is a strong supply signal for ETH, indicating that some chips may have entered long-term holding, staking, or custody. Next, I will observe whether inflows continue on the 11th and 12th trading days and whether the price can hold around $2,400 DON’T CONFUSE A STRONG RALLY WITH A FREE PASS TO TAKE RISK
$BTC pushed above $80K before facing selling pressure, while altcoins remain much more volatile.
Keep $BTC and $ETH as the core. Treat $H, $LAB, $CORE, $ASTER and $BEAT as higher-risk plays—not foundations.
Don’t chase every pump. Protect capital and wait for confirmation. 👀
$BTC $ETH#Daily