Orbit Post Sitemap
The crypto derivatives market is experiencing a widespread liquidity retreat. According to A's early issuance monitoring, Perp DEXs had a trading volume of about $498.2 billion over the past 30 days, down 63.4% from the peak of about $1.36 trillion in October last year. Almost all major protocols are contracting in tandem: Hyperliquid: daily average trading volume fell from $5.988 billion to $3.058 billion; Lighter: from $1.666 billion to $1.111 billion; GRVT: Sunday average volume down 59.1%; DYDX: Sunday average volume down 43.2%; Ethereum and Solana: down 26.8% and 22.5% respectively. During the same period, HLP's scale dropped to about $215 million, with a yield of only about 0.018%; Lighter LLP fell to $80.62 million. Market Characteristics Divergence: Trade.xyz is one of the few protocols that continues to grow—its daily average turnover rose from $3.888 billion to $5.134 billion, and its share of crypto and traditional asset contracts rose from 39.4% to 62.7%. At the core of this differentiation is that Trade.xyz connect crypto and traditional financial markets through perpetual contracts, covering US stocks and Korean tech stocks, and absorbing some cross-market trading demand during liquidity contractions within the crypto market. Some observations: Hyperliquid's HLP size has declined in sync with yields, indicating that the attractiveness of arbitrage funds is waning; Wintermut📊 $XAUT Contract Liquidation Express (August 8)
According to liquidation data, this round of shorts got brutally crushed by the "dog whales"...
Time Total Liquidation Long Liquidation Short Liquidation
1 hour $5,725.85 $0 $5,725.85
4 hours $75,500 $0 $75,500
12 hours $91,500 $189.66 $91,300
24 hours $139,500 $33,900 $105,600
From the $XAUT liquidation data, short liquidations in the 1-hour and 4-hour windows overwhelmingly surpass longs, with shorts monopolizing all liquidations. The short squeeze unfolded with nuclear-level intensity in short cycles; the 12-hour short advantage remains dominant, with shorts 481 times the longs, squeezing through short to mid cycles; 24-hour short liquidations surged to $105,600, 3.1 times the longs. The "dog whales" completed a full-cycle slaughter of shorts on XAUT—shorts across short, mid, and long cycles were comprehensively targeted and blasted, while longs' only resistance appeared slightly in the long cycle but was negligible. Total liquidations exceeded $130,000. As a gold stablecoin, XAUT's liquidation scale significantly expanded today, with shorts bleeding heavily and the short squeeze momentum unstoppable. Everyone, manage your positions carefully to avoid being repeatedly harvested.
🔥 Market Indicator | August 8
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the market has entered a phase of "expectations maxed out, flaws punished"—"exceeding expectations" is just the baseline; any signal of slowing growth will be magnified.
💾 Storage Stocks Drop After Earnings: The Better the Performance, the Harder the Fall
SanDisk delivered a "legendary" earnings report: Q4 revenue $8.965 billion, a 372% year-over-year surge; Western Digital's revenue for the same period was $3.747 billion. SK Hynix's Q2 revenue was 79.32 trillion KRW, a 557% year-over-year increase.
However, SanDisk plunged nearly 8% in after-hours trading. The culprit was guidance—next quarter's revenue midpoint at $10.55 billion, below the market expectation of $10.82 billion. The market's pricing logic for storage stocks has shifted from "how good the performance is" to "whether growth is fast enough."
Is the AI memory bull market still stable? UBS forecasts total storage industry revenue will reach $992 billion by 2026, nearly doubling to $1.76 trillion in 2027, with HBM as the core driver. But short-term corrections are also real—as of the end of July, AI storage leaders have averaged a 40% drawdown; in July, SK Hynix's Korean stock saw a maximum drawdown of 54%, Samsung Electronics 42%, and SanDisk plunged 47% in a single month. The long-term logic of the super cycle remains intact, but valuations have run ahead of fundamentals, so any flaw will be magnified.
🏛️ Fed Hawkish Signals Heat Up: Weak Employment Can't Suppress Inflation Anxiety
The July FOMC meeting saw the first three dissenting votes aligned since 2016—three regional Fed presidents advocated a 25 basis point rate hike. Voter Kashkari even said three hikes this year "are not impossible."
Can weak employment suppress inflation? July ADP new jobs were only 44,000, the weakest since January. But wage growth remained high at 4.4%, and the ISM services PMI price component surged to 70.3, the highest in four months—"weak employment, strong prices" forms a classic stagflation signal. The market still prices a 54.9% chance of a rate hike in September.
🚀 SpaceX Rises After Unlock: Classic "Bad News Is Good News" Scenario
On August 6, SpaceX's first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares unlocked, potentially releasing about $100 billion in market value. The market had widely expected a sell-off.
Instead, the stock rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. The 13.6% plunge after earnings on Wednesday had already released unlocking pressure; new sell orders were effectively absorbed by bargain hunters and short covering. The market played out the classic "bad news is good news" script. However, the alert is not over—another 319 million shares may unlock on August 20, and about 700 million more are expected in September.
💎 Summary
SanDisk's 372% growth was met with a plunge, proving storage stock valuations have run ahead of fundamentals; the Fed is caught between weak employment and high inflation, with stagflation signals emerging; SpaceX's counter-trend rise on unlock day played out the classic "bad news is good news" scenario. When beating expectations becomes standard, every deviation in guidance is infinitely magnified—the old logic is collapsing, new pricing power is forming, and it punishes all "imperfect" answers. #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ Is August really bad for Bitcoin?
Since 2013, BTC has closed with a positive candle in August 9 out of 13 times, nearly 70%.
Although there has been a slight rebound since the beginning of the month (2.3%), the situation this year is quite unfavorable for Bitcoin because funds are being drawn away by AI and other high-risk assets.
The buying power in cryptocurrencies, including ETFs, is also weak, with no new trends or narratives to attract more capital. At this stage, it feels like BTC is still bottoming out for this cycle.
*Reference information, not investment advice A lockup expiry can reveal more about positioning than fundamentals. SpaceX rising about 6% as up to 911.5M shares became eligible for sale suggests the immediate supply risk may have been more anticipated than feared.
Still, the first post-IPO report leaves a harder test ahead: roughly $7.8B in revenue, up about 90% YoY, alongside a $541M net loss and concern over higher AI capex. My read is that the rebound buys management time, not immunity. From here, guidance, margins and cash discipline must turn the AI-space infrastructure thesis into measurable operating progress. Not advice, just analysis.
#SpaceXUnlockRebound #AIMemoryBullTest #FedHawksVsWeakJobs A lockup expiry can reveal more about positioning than fundamentals. SpaceX rising about 6% as up to 911.5M shares became eligible for sale suggests the immediate supply risk may have been more anticipated than feared.
Still, the first post-IPO report leaves a harder test ahead: roughly $7.8B in revenue, up about 90% YoY, alongside a $541M net loss and concern over higher AI capex. My read is that the rebound buys management time, not immunity. From here, guidance, margins and cash discipline must turn the AI-space infrastructure thesis into measurable operating progress. Not advice, just analysis.
#SpaceXUnlockRebound #OKXOrbit#AIMemoryBullTest #FedHawksVsWeakJobs #SpaceXUnlockRebound $MU
Micron's decline on Thursday was dragged down by the storage sector's collective "valuation kill," rather than deterioration in its own fundamentals.
Its Q3 revenue of 41.4 billion (+346%) and gross margin of 84.6% remain strong, with mid-to-long-term logic such as HBM4, strategic customer agreements, and CPU-side AI agents intact.
Deutsche Bank believes that memory accounting for 50% of AI system value marks a structural shift, making this cycle fundamentally different from any previous memory booms.
The current forward P/E of about 6 times is at a crossroads of intense bullish and bearish contention.
The passive decline caused by the back-and-forth in storage.
800 and 1000 are both psychological thresholds.
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ The reaction across memory and storage stocks this week taught me something important:
AI demand can remain strong while AI-related stocks still fall hard.
Western Digital beat estimates with roughly $3.75B in quarterly revenue and $3.56 adjusted EPS, yet investors punished the stock. Sandisk also delivered a strong quarter, including $8.97B revenue, but its next-quarter revenue midpoint failed to clear the expectations already built into the price.
That distinction matters.
The market isn't asking whether AI needs more storage and memory anymore.
It already believes that.
It is asking whether scarcity, pricing power and margins can keep improving fast enough to justify valuations that have already moved several years forward.
That's a much harder test.
Sandisk and Western Digital had risen dramatically during the AI infrastructure trade before this correction, so simply “beating estimates” became insufficient. Investors wanted another acceleration.
Meanwhile, actual memory supply still looks tight.
NVIDIA and SK Group recently expanded their long-term partnership around next-generation AI memory, while industry research says 2027 HBM negotiations remain constrained by limited supply.
There are even discussions around reducing memory configurations in future Rubin Ultra designs because of packaging and supply constraints. If that happens, I would not automatically interpret it as weaker AI demand. It could be engineers adapting the product to what the supply chain can realistically deliver.
That's the real bull test now:
Not “Is AI consuming more memory?”
But “Can memory suppliers convert scarcity into durable earnings before expectations outrun reality?”
That is the metric I would watch.
#AIMemoryBullTest
#FedHawksVsWeakJobs
#SpaceXUnlockRebound
$BTC $XSPCX $SOL While the massive bond issuance received several times oversubscription, the secondary market stock price has continuously plummeted, with capital expenditure expansion and core technical talent loss intersecting at the same time.
Alphabet completed a $25 billion bond issuance, with the longest maturity yield exceeding Treasury bonds by 1.3 percentage points and attracting $115 billion in orders, yet $GOOGL stock price dropped more than 5% within two days after the related announcement.
The 2026 capital expenditure forecast was raised to a maximum of $205 billion, causing free cash flow to turn negative, coupled with over $114 billion in debt financing since early 2025, and the departure of core researchers has raised market doubts about capital efficiency.
Rising financing costs intertwined with technical talent loss have significantly lowered risk appetite in the equity market, and the expectation that capital expenditure can be immediately converted into commercial monetization is being repriced.
If large-scale computing power investment can quickly convert into measurable commercial revenue and drive cash flow recovery, market valuation will regain support; if monetization pace lags behind debt interest and capital expenditure consumption, the upward path will be interrupted.
If the market confirms that model iteration delays caused by core researcher departures persist and cash flow continues to be consumed leading to high borrowing costs, selling pressure from position adjustments may further expand; if the new management structure quickly demonstrates R&D efficiency, downside risk will be contained.
The root cause of the current valuation correction lies in capital expenditure crowding out cash flow. Once the pace of debt scale expansion slows or computing power monetization efficiency exceeds expectations, the current market pessimism about infrastructure overconsumption will be disproved.
In the next 7 days, focus on observing the spread trends between long-term government bonds and corporate bonds to assess the ongoing transmission strength of debt financing costs to equity asset valuations.
#谷歌母公司发债250亿美元，AI投入压力升温 #联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？ #CLARITY投票或延至9月，伦理分歧未解 📊 $NEAR Contract Liquidation Express (August 8)
According to liquidation data, this wave of longs was brutally crushed by the short whales...
Time Total Liquidation Long Liquidation Short Liquidation
1 hour $129.34 $81.58 $47.76
4 hours $1,975.36 $1,740.93 $234.44
12 hours $180,500 $180,200 $244.44
24 hours $272,500 $270,500 $1,988.39
From the $NEAR liquidation data, the long-short gap in 1 hour is small, direction unclear; in 4 hours, long liquidations overwhelm shorts, longs are 7.4 times shorts, a full-scale long squeeze erupts; in 12 hours, long advantage sharply expands, ratio soars to 737 times, long squeeze reaches nuclear intensity; in 24 hours, long liquidations surge to $270,000, 136 times shorts, the whales have completed a full-cycle slaughter of longs on NEAR—short, medium, and long-term longs are all targeted and blasted, shorts’ only resistance is futile, total liquidation exceeds $270,000. Longs are bleeding heavily, the long squeeze is unstoppable. Everyone control your positions, don’t get harvested back and forth.
🔥 Market Indicator | August 8
Today’s three hot topics point to the same theme: the market has entered a "fully priced expectations, any flaw will be punished" phase—"exceeding expectations" is just the baseline, any signal of slowing growth will be amplified.
💾 Storage Stocks Drop After Earnings: The Better the Results, the Harder the Fall
SanDisk delivered a "legendary" earnings report: Q4 revenue $8.965 billion, up 372% year-over-year; Western Digital’s revenue for the same period was $3.747 billion. SK Hynix’s Q2 revenue was 79.32 trillion KRW, up 557% year-over-year.
However, SanDisk plunged nearly 8% after hours. The culprit was guidance—next quarter’s revenue midpoint at $10.55 billion, below market expectations of $10.82 billion. The market’s pricing logic for storage stocks has shifted from "how good the results are" to "whether growth is fast enough."
Is the AI memory bull market still stable? UBS predicts total storage industry revenue will reach $992 billion in 2026, nearly doubling to $1.76 trillion in 2027, with HBM as the core driver. But short-term pullbacks are also real—as of end-July, AI storage leaders have averaged about 40% drawdown; in July, SK Hynix’s Korean stock had a max drawdown of 54%, Samsung Electronics 42%, SanDisk plunged 47% in one month. The long-term logic of the super cycle remains intact, but valuations have run ahead of fundamentals, so any flaw will be magnified.
🏛️ Fed Hawkish Signals Heat Up: Weak Employment Can’t Suppress Inflation Anxiety
The July FOMC meeting saw the first three dissenting votes aligned since 2016—three regional Fed presidents advocated a 25 basis point hike. Voter Kashkari even said three hikes this year "are not impossible."
Can weak employment suppress inflation? July ADP new jobs were only 44,000, the weakest since January. But wage growth stayed high at 4.4%, and the ISM services PMI price component soared to 70.3, the highest in four months—"weak employment, strong prices" forms a classic stagflation signal. The market still prices a 54.9% chance of a rate hike in September.
🚀 SpaceX Rises After Unlock: Classic "Bad News Is Good News" Scenario
On August 6, SpaceX’s first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares unlocked, potentially releasing about $100 billion in market value. The market had widely expected a sell-off.
Instead, the stock rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. The 13.6% post-earnings plunge on Wednesday had already priced in the unlock pressure; new selling was effectively absorbed by bargain hunters and short covering. The market played out the classic "bad news is good news" script. But the alert is not over—another 319 million shares may unlock on August 20, and about 700 million more are expected in September.
💎 Summary
SanDisk’s 372% growth was met with a plunge, proving storage stock valuations have run ahead of fundamentals; the Fed is caught between weak employment and high inflation, stagflation signals are emerging; SpaceX’s counter-trend rise on unlock day played out the classic "bad news is good news" script. When beating expectations becomes standard, every deviation in guidance will be infinitely magnified—the old logic is collapsing, new pricing power is forming, and it punishes all "imperfect" answers. #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ I don't think the latest U.S. jobs data can be read simply as “weak jobs = easier Fed.”
July private payrolls increased by only 44K, well below the 75K consensus, while June was revised lower to 95K.
But the details are more interesting.
Services still added jobs while goods-producing industries lost them, and education and healthcare accounted for a large part of the gains. At the same time, the ISM services index remained expansionary at 54.1, while its employment component fell to 47.4.
That creates a strange setup:
Economic activity hasn't collapsed.
Hiring is cooling.
But inflation pressure hasn't disappeared either.
Fed Governor Lisa Cook has already warned that inflation risks remain tilted upward, pointing to tariffs, energy and even the huge AI investment cycle as possible sources of price pressure. The Fed's July report also said inflation remains elevated relative to its 2% objective.
That is why markets are still assigning meaningful probability to a September hike despite weaker hiring data.
For crypto, I think this distinction matters.
A weak payroll headline alone isn't necessarily bullish if wage pressure and inflation stay sticky.
I’ll be watching the combination of payrolls + wages + unemployment + CPI, not one jobs number.
The difficult scenario for risk assets isn't simply weak growth.
It is weaker hiring without enough disinflation to give the Fed room to ease.
#FedHawksVsWeakJobs
$BTC $ETH $BICO #FedHawksVsWeakJobs #Alphabet25BBond What caught my attention with SpaceX was not the 911.5M-share unlock itself.
It was how the market handled it.
That amount is larger than the roughly 639M shares originally sold in the IPO, so on paper this was a serious increase in available supply.
Normally, that creates a simple fear: insiders get liquidity, more shares hit the market, price comes under pressure.
Instead, SpaceX jumped after the restriction expired.
To me, that says part of the selling risk had already been priced before the actual event. The market spent days preparing for supply that did not arrive as aggressively as feared.
But I think the bigger story starts now.
SpaceX also reported $7.8B in quarterly revenue, around 90% higher YoY, while posting a $541M net loss. The uncomfortable number was spending: AI infrastructure investment reached roughly $15.8B as the company builds much deeper into compute.
So the question is slowly changing.
Before the unlock, investors were asking: Who will sell?
Now they need to ask: How efficiently can SpaceX turn this enormous infrastructure spending into future cash flow?
More lockup tranches are still coming, with around 40% of shares expected to become tradable by December. That keeps supply risk alive.
The first unlock tested liquidity.
The next phase tests execution.
$SPCX $SNDK $BTC
#SpaceXUnlockRebound
#AIMemoryBullTest At 14 rounds I said, "Breadth turning red with 9 up and 6 down or more counts as a confirmation of a rise," but this hour OKX directly hit 13 up and 2 down. The signal has come, but Fear is still stuck at 29, BTC only +0.4%, and the HFT that sneaked up 21% yesterday has now crashed -19.69%—breadth is shouting rise, but sentiment is still scared stiff in the corner.
BTC finally turned red this hour, $64,957, 24h +0.41%, no longer playing dead. Funding +0.0053% neutral with a slight tilt, OI 105,100 BTC steady as an old dog, bulls haven’t withdrawn a single one.
The strongest evidence of capital flow is breadth: 13 up 2 down, a big step up from the previous round’s 8 up 7 down. But volume hasn’t followed—total market volume is flat at -3.3%, still a "breadth leads, volume is holding back" low-volume structure.
What does this mean for BTC/ETH? Breadth moves first (money starts daring to buy small coins), price moves later (BTC just turned red), exactly the mirror image of the 14 rounds where "volume moves first, breadth moves later": now breadth has moved, price is following, volume is still holding back.
Real review: my BICO long is still alive (OKX leaderboard 24h +67.48% crazy dog still running, but 1h already -2.49% starting to give back), ADA long position held. Here’s a framework you can take away—breadth explosion + BTC turning red = short-term bull confirmation, but if volume doesn’t expand (flat at -3.3%) it’s "breadth ahead of volume," prone to false breakouts; real action requires volume expansion and Fear rising above 35. HFT going from +21% to -19.69% is a live textbook example: the sneaky runners collapse first, breadth is the reliable one.
This round, do you trust breadth or Fear? A 13 up 2 down is a bull horn blast B volume not expanding is a fake move to run first C anyway HFT collapsed so I’m lying flat. Brothers, comment with letters, I’ll take you as a contrarian indicator (manual dog head).
Crypto assets are high risk, this article does not constitute investment advice, purely personal opinion.
$BTC $BICO $ADA #OKXPlanet #MarketAnalysis #MarketUpdate #BTCRise #CapitalFlow #MarketBreadth📊 $BCH Contract Liquidation Update (August 8)
According to liquidation data, the shorts were brutally crushed by the dog whales...
Time Total Liquidations Long Liquidations Short Liquidations
1 hour $0 $0 $0
4 hours $6,773.97 $2,246.67 $4,527.30
12 hours $13,400 $2,886.40 $10,500
24 hours $26,800 $11,800 $14,900
From the $BCH liquidation data, zero liquidations in 1 hour indicate a brief market silence; in 4 and 12 hours, short liquidations crushed longs, with short liquidations being 2x and 3.6x that of longs respectively, showing a strong short squeeze unfolding in the short to mid term; in 24 hours, short liquidations still lead by about 1.26 times, but long resistance has significantly strengthened—long liquidations surged from zero in 1 hour to $11,800. The dog whales have executed a short-to-mid-term short squeeze and a long-term tug-of-war on BCH. Shorts still dominate but the directional choice remains uncertain, with total liquidations surpassing $26,000. Everyone, manage your positions carefully to avoid being chopped back and forth.
🔥 Market Barometer | August 8
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the market has entered a "fully priced expectations, flaws punished" phase—"exceeding expectations" is just the baseline, and any sign of slowing growth will be magnified.
💾 Storage Stocks Drop After Earnings: The Better the Results, the Harder the Fall
SanDisk delivered a "legendary" earnings report: Q4 revenue $8.965 billion, up 372% year-over-year; Western Digital's revenue for the same period was $3.747 billion. SK Hynix's Q2 revenue was 79.32 trillion KRW, up 557% year-over-year.
However, SanDisk plunged nearly 8% after hours. The culprit was guidance—next quarter's revenue midpoint of $10.55 billion fell short of the market expectation of $10.82 billion. The market's pricing logic for storage stocks has shifted from "how good the results are" to "whether growth is fast enough."
Is the AI memory bull market still stable? UBS forecasts total storage industry revenue will reach $992 billion by 2026 and nearly double to $1.76 trillion by 2027, with HBM as the core driver. But short-term pullbacks are real—by the end of July, AI storage leaders had an average drawdown of about 40%; in July, SK Hynix's Korean stock had a max drawdown of 54%, Samsung Electronics 42%, and SanDisk plunged 47% in a single month. The long-term logic of the super cycle remains intact, but valuations have outpaced fundamentals, so any flaw will be magnified.
🏛️ Fed Hawkish Signals Heat Up: Weak Employment Can't Suppress Inflation Anxiety
The July FOMC meeting saw the first three dissenting votes aligned since 2016—three regional Fed presidents advocated a 25 basis point hike. Voter Kashkari even said three hikes this year "are not impossible."
Can weak employment suppress inflation? July ADP job additions were only 44,000, the weakest since January. But wage growth stayed high at 4.4%, and the ISM services PMI price component surged to 70.3, the highest in four months—"weak employment, strong prices" forms a classic stagflation signal. The market still prices a 54.9% chance of a rate hike in September.
🚀 SpaceX Rises After Lockup Expiry: A Classic "Bad News is Good News" Scenario
On August 6, SpaceX's first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares unlocked, potentially releasing about $100 billion in market value. The market had widely expected a sell-off.
Instead, the stock rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. The 13.6% plunge after earnings on Wednesday had already priced in the lockup pressure; new selling was effectively absorbed by bargain hunters and short covering. The market played out the classic "bad news is good news" script. However, the alert is not over—another 319 million shares may unlock on August 20, and about 700 million more are expected in September.
💎 Summary
SanDisk's 372% growth was met with a plunge, proving storage stock valuations have outpaced fundamentals; the Fed is caught between weak employment and high inflation, with stagflation signals emerging; SpaceX's counter-trend rise on lockup day played out the classic "bad news is good news" scenario. When beating expectations becomes standard, every deviation in guidance is magnified infinitely—the old logic is collapsing, new pricing power is forming, and it punishes all "imperfect" answers. #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ Alphabet is increasing its 2026 AI capital expenditure to $205 billion through a $25 billion bond issuance. Coupled with the loss of core technical talent, this is driving up bond market yield premiums and suppressing risk appetite in the U.S. tech stock sector.
The $115 billion oversubscription in the primary market confirms strong credit-side demand for long-duration high-yield bonds, but the stock market is pricing in free cash flow deterioration risk with a single-day drop of 1.4% and a cumulative decline exceeding 5%. Since early 2025, cumulative bond financing exceeding $114 billion and nearly $85 billion in equity financing have rapidly expanded the company's capital structure leverage, marking the first time since its IPO that quarterly free cash flow has turned negative.
The core factors driving the current market are, in order: the upward shift in liquidity discount present value caused by pressure on forward free cash flow; efficiency decline in converting computing power to revenue due to loss of core technical teams; and the term premium increase across tech stocks caused by large-scale bond issuance. If high computing power investments do not coincide with breakthroughs in model iteration, capital expenditures will directly translate into a permanent erosion of net profit margins.
The upside scenario trigger is rapid monetization of computing power following the launch of new data centers in the first half of 2026, along with a narrowing of bond secondary market spreads to within 1.0 percentage point above Treasury yields. The key variable to watch is whether cloud business marginal profit margins stabilize again; invalidation signals include further upward revisions of capital expenditures in subsequent quarters or equity dilution from stock refinancing. Under this scenario, long positions will reprice around Alphabet’s infrastructure moat.
The downside scenario trigger is diminishing marginal returns on computing power and continued loss of key research teams to competitors, causing delays in productization cycles. Variables to monitor include the rate of decline in institutional holdings concentration of $GOOGL and the expansion of credit default swap spreads; invalidation signals are technological iterations that bring absolute advantages to core products. If this scenario materializes, the market will revalue Alphabet as a cyclical capital-intensive enterprise with downward adjustments.
The invalidation condition for these polarized scenarios is a systemic shift in the macro interest rate environment, where the erosion of the balance sheet by high borrowing costs is offset by overall liquidity easing. When the average premium level of 10-year U.S. tech bonds contracts significantly, the risk appetite transmission chain will be driven by valuation multiples rather than cash flow quality.
Key variables to observe over the next 7 days include the trading spread trend of Alphabet’s $25 billion bond in the secondary market and the pace of institutional position adjustments in $GOOGL on the block trading market.
#西联稳定币卡落地，Visa支付场景再推进 #Circle财报后押注Arc，USDC能否迎来新增长？ #CLARITY投票或延至9月，伦理分歧未解 ETH is starting to gain relative to BTC, and this signal is worth watching.
In recent days, the ETH/BTC ratio has stabilized around 0.0295-0.0296, even showing slight upward signs. ETH price is currently around 1900-1910, while BTC hovers between 64300-64400. In absolute terms, ETH's price fluctuations are not large, but its relative strength against BTC is gradually returning.
This is not a sudden breakout; in July, ETH clearly outperformed in a round: that month, ETH rose by just over 20%, while BTC only had single-digit gains. The ratio has slowly lifted from a lower position and is now stuck testing this level repeatedly.
Key points directly:
• If ETH/BTC can hold and break above 0.030, short-term relative strength will be clearer, with the next target at 0.031-0.032.
• Falling below 0.029 means the previous relative strength may need more time to develop.
• ETH's own resistance is at 1915-1920; breaking through that looks toward 1950; support is first at 1835-1840, and breaking below that could easily drop to around 1800.
Why is it starting to strengthen? The core reason is changes in supply-demand and capital preference. The circulating supply of ETH on exchanges has been squeezed to very low levels, and the staking ratio has reached a historic high, meaning less volume is available to sell. Additionally, products with staking yields (such as institutionally promoted staked ETH funds) are attracting money, so capital is no longer only focused on the "digital gold" narrative.
On the BTC side, institutional ETF scale is much larger, but inflow pace recently is not as strong as before. The market is beginning to reprice: BTC is the base holding, while ETH has real use cases (L2, stablecoin settlement, RWA are still active). Once risk appetite returns slightly, capital will shift a bit from BTC to ETH.
It's not yet a full alt season; BTC's dominance remains high. But if ETH's relative strength can continue, it often signals capital starting to spread outward. Next, watch if the ratio can effectively hold above 0.030 and if ETH can break 1920 with volume.
Manage your own positions; don't just watch the excitement Actually, I have always believed that the Federal Reserve is not as composed as the market imagines. Rate hikes seem more like a political performance before the midterm elections, while rate cuts are the already predetermined endgame — no matter how much the performance goes on, it can't change the inevitable conclusion of high interest rates coming to an end, which is also why I have been bullish all along.
Looking at the recent situation in the crypto space, Bitcoin $BTC has been repeatedly testing around $64,000, Ethereum $ETH hovers around $1,900, and a weak ADP report once pushed BTC higher. However, once hawkish signals reemerged, BTC and ETH fell about 2.8% and 3.6% respectively last week, with net outflows from spot ETFs.
ADP new jobs plunged to 44,000, less than half of last month, but PCE inflation remains high at 3.7%. Amid these conflicting data, Cook and Kashkari took turns calling for rate hikes, but everyone knows these tough words won't last long.
The capital market votes with real money. On August 4, Nvidia and Microsoft each contributed about $700 billion in market value, pushing the Nasdaq up 2.13%; but as the probability of rate hikes rose, memory chip stocks plummeted on August 6, with Western Digital down 13%, SanDisk $SNDK down over 6%, and AI software stocks also sharply falling.
Short-term hawkish rhetoric will continue, but once the midterm elections are over, high interest rates will have to come to an end. Debt pressure and economic slowdown make rate cuts not an option but an inevitability. Everyone is waiting for a turning point. The torment of sideways trading at $64,000: Why the derivatives data isn’t lying this time?
Bitcoin has been oscillating narrowly above $64,000 these days, neither breaking up nor crashing down, causing many short-term traders to panic, fearing this might be a signal for a big crash after a slow decline.
But after I pulled up the CME spot-futures basis and exchange funding rates, my judgment is completely the opposite.
If you watch the market long enough, you’ll know that real crashes usually happen when the market is extremely euphoric and leverage piles up like a mountain. But the current derivatives indicators reveal a very healthy and counterintuitive signal: retail traders’ high leverage has mostly been washed out, and the current sideways movement is an extremely mild "deleveraging" process.
This feeling is especially obvious in the changes in my own account.
When Bitcoin surged to high levels recently, the annualized funding rate on major exchanges once exceeded 30%. My long positions were being "cut" daily by high holding costs, forcing me to proactively close half of my positions to avoid risk. But in the past two days, the network-wide funding rate has basically returned to zero, and the CME annualized basis has fallen back to a healthy range of about 7%. This means that those buying at $64,000 now are definitely not short-term leveraged longs who could be liquidated at any moment.
So, who exactly is supporting the current buy-side?
The answer is institutional basis arbitrageurs (Basis Trade). They buy Bitcoin spot while simultaneously selling an equal amount of shorts in options or futures markets, earning this 7% risk-free annualized basis yield. This arbitrage capital isn’t afraid of price drops because their positions are fully hedged. As long as the spot-futures price difference exists, they will continuously buy spot, providing a very solid "invisible floor" for the spot market.
As long as this hedged buy-side remains, it’s hard for pure futures shorts to smash the price below $64,000 into a bottomless pit.
Of course, this also means that a strong rally is unlikely in the short term because arbitrageurs are not directional buyers; they don’t push prices up. The sideways grind may continue for a while. My current strategy is simple: avoid any contracts, and take advantage of the zero funding rate vacuum period to steadily accumulate spot in the $63,000–$64,000 range.
If my judgment is wrong, I will closely watch if the CME basis falls below 5%. Once an abnormal negative basis appears, indicating arbitrage capital is collectively withdrawing, I will not hesitate to pull back my defensive line.
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 SanDisk and Western Digital reported earnings far beyond expectations, but their stock prices plunged. Previously, market expectations were too high, and quarterly guidance did not meet these expectations, prompting investors to take profits and exit. Rigid demand for AI memory remains strong, supply shortages will persist until 2027, and the foundation of the bull market remains unbroken. The market has now entered a phase of high volatility, with short-term fluctuations but long-term prospects still promising. #存储股财报后下挫, is the AI memory bull market still stable? 📊 $SOL Contract Liquidation Express (August 8)
According to liquidation data, this round of shorts got brutally crushed by the "dog whale"...
Time Total Liquidations Long Liquidations Short Liquidations
1 hour $473,200 $43,500 $429,700
4 hours $548,600 $79,200 $469,400
12 hours $1,723,700 $1,246,000 $477,600
24 hours $3,641,400 $3,030,300 $611,100
From the $SOL liquidation data, short liquidations crushed longs in the 1-hour and 4-hour windows, with short liquidations 9.8 and 5.9 times that of longs respectively, indicating a short squeeze unfolding with nuclear intensity in short cycles; the 12-hour direction reversed, with long liquidations surpassing shorts by about 2.6 times, signaling a full-scale long liquidation; in 24 hours, long liquidations surged to $3.03 million, 4.96 times that of shorts. The "dog whale" on SOL completed a fierce turnaround from short squeeze to long liquidation — short-cycle short sellers were targeted and blasted, mid-to-long cycle long holders were wiped out, with cumulative liquidations exceeding $3.64 million. Everyone, manage your positions carefully to avoid being harvested back and forth.
🔥 Market Barometer | August 8
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the market has entered a "fully priced expectations, flaws will be punished" phase — "exceeding expectations" is just the baseline, any signal of slowing growth will be magnified.
💾 Storage Stocks Drop After Earnings: The Better the Performance, the Harder the Fall
SanDisk delivered a "legendary" earnings report: Q4 revenue $8.965 billion, a 372% year-over-year surge; Western Digital's revenue for the same period was $3.747 billion. SK Hynix's Q2 revenue was 79.32 trillion KRW, a 557% year-over-year increase.
However, SanDisk plunged nearly 8% in after-hours trading. The culprit was guidance — next quarter's revenue midpoint at $10.55 billion, below the market expectation of $10.82 billion. The market's pricing logic for storage stocks has shifted from "how good the performance is" to "whether the growth rate is fast enough."
Is the AI memory bull market still stable? UBS predicts total storage industry revenue will reach $992 billion by 2026, nearly doubling to $1.76 trillion in 2027, with HBM as the core driver. But short-term pullbacks are also real — as of the end of July, AI storage leaders have averaged about 40% drawdown; in July, SK Hynix's Korean stock had a maximum drawdown of 54%, Samsung Electronics 42%, SanDisk plunged 47% in a single month. The long-term logic of the super cycle remains intact, but valuations have run ahead of fundamentals, so any flaw will be magnified.
🏛️ Fed Hawkish Signals Heat Up: Weak Employment Can't Suppress Inflation Anxiety
The July FOMC meeting saw the first three dissenting votes aligned since 2016 — three regional Fed presidents advocated a 25 basis point rate hike. Voter Kashkari even said three hikes this year "are not impossible."
Can weak employment suppress inflation? July ADP new jobs were only 44,000, the weakest since January. But wage growth remained high at 4.4%, and the ISM services PMI price component soared to 70.3, the highest in four months — "weak employment, strong prices" forms a classic stagflation signal. The market still prices a 54.9% chance of a rate hike in September.
🚀 SpaceX Rises After Unlock: Classic "Bad News Is Good News" Scenario
On August 6, SpaceX's first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares unlocked, potentially releasing a market value of about $100 billion. The market had widely expected a sell-off.
Instead, the stock rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. The 13.6% plunge after earnings on Wednesday had already priced in the unlocking pressure; new sell orders were effectively absorbed by bargain hunters and short covering. The market played out the classic "bad news is good news" script. However, the alert is not over — another 319 million shares may unlock on August 20, and about 700 million more are expected in September.
💎 Summary
SanDisk's 372% growth was met with a plunge, proving storage stock valuations have run ahead of fundamentals; the Fed is caught between weak employment and high inflation, with stagflation signals emerging; SpaceX's counter-trend rise on unlock day played out the classic "bad news is good news" scenario. When earnings beating expectations becomes standard, every deviation in guidance will be infinitely magnified — old logics are collapsing, new pricing power is forming, and it punishes all "imperfect" answers. #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ Weak employment, why can't it stop the Fed from raising rates?
Non-farm payrolls keep cooling down: Who is the Fed really listening to?
Recent macro contradictions are prominent: internal divisions within the Fed are rare; in July, 3 officials directly called for a 25bp rate hike; but ADP and non-farm data have continuously weakened, showing clear cooling in employment.
The core lies in the Fed's rules: 2% inflation is the top priority. Currently, core PCE remains above 3.4%, coupled with geopolitics pushing up oil prices, the risk of inflation rebound is the hawkish confidence. Weak employment can only limit "large consecutive rate hikes," but it is unlikely to force rate cuts, at most it will keep high interest rates for longer.
Current situation: stubborn inflation, the probability of a rate hike in September has risen above 63%; employment continues to weaken, signaling clear economic cooling.
Weak employment cannot hold back rate hike expectations, and macro liquidity is unlikely to ease in the short term, posing risks to risk assets.
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？ #Storage stocks plunge after earnings reports, is the AI memory bull market still stable?
This earnings season for storage stocks has been strikingly uniform—blowout results, stock prices plummeting. Last night, Western Digital dropped over 13%, SanDisk nearly 7%, SK Hynix ADR about 5%. Earnings were dazzling, but the market reaction was brutally cold.
First, let's look at how explosive the numbers are.
SanDisk Q4 revenue was ¥8.965 billion, a year-over-year surge of 372%, EPS $39.25 crushing expectations, gross margin 84.6%, and they approved a ¥14 billion buyback. Data center revenue was ¥2.98 billion, doubling quarter-over-quarter and soaring 1298% year-over-year. Western Digital revenue was ¥3.747 billion, up 44% year-over-year, EPS $3.56 beating expectations.
Then the stock prices crashed.
The trigger was guidance being "not good enough." SanDisk's next quarter revenue guidance midpoint is ¥10.55 billion, while the market expected ¥11.148 billion. A difference of less than 6%, yet the stock dropped 9%. Western Digital's guidance midpoint of ¥4.1 billion was actually above the expected ¥4.06 billion, but still fell over 15%. Beating earnings is no longer enough; the market demands "continuous amazement."
The core contradiction: expectations ran too fast.
SanDisk's stock rose over 460% this year, Western Digital about 200%. The stock prices have already priced in the "AI storage supercycle" script ahead of time. Goldman Sachs put it bluntly—"market expectations have excessively outpaced reality." Storage prices rose 90% in Q1, 60% in Q2, and are expected to rise over 20% in Q3/Q4. Absolute values are still rising, but the pace is slowing. When stock prices have priced in a perfect script of "continuous acceleration," any signal of normalization is interpreted as a peak warning.
So is the AI memory bull market still stable?
Citibank believes supply chain inventory is at a low level, supply-demand fulfillment rate has dropped from 70% to 50%, and capacity cannot meet orders. Nomura also says AI-driven structural demand growth has not yet peaked. Morgan Stanley judges this is just a "healthy reset," with AI pushing the cycle peak several quarters later. Fundamentals have indeed not collapsed; HBM capacity is basically sold out by 2027, and long-term contracts lock in revenue for the coming years.
But several warning signals have already lit up. Gross margin guidance flat quarter-over-quarter is interpreted as "peaking." DRAM and NAND inventories have slightly risen. Consumer demand is being squeezed by AI; SanDisk's consumer business fell 32% quarter-over-quarter. The market is now trading not on "how much more can it rise," but on "when will the slope flatten."
This storage rally is very similar to Nvidia in 2024—gross margin pulled from over 40% to near 80%, stock price rose tenfold, then consolidated for over a year. Expectations peak first, fundamentals peak later.
At this point, I won't go all-in bottom fishing, nor will I stay completely out and miss the move. I use a grid strategy to trade swings within the range, waiting for fundamentals to peak confirmed or disproved by data before deciding. Before signals land, heavily betting on direction is risking principal on a signal that hasn't appeared yet.The numbers are impressive.
But the stock price is dropping first. Folks, AI storage isn't lacking demand; it's just that expectations ran too fast.
As of 07:59 Beijing time, $SNDK is at $1258.58, down 6.79% intraday. Q4 revenue was $8.965 billion, up 51% quarter-over-quarter; data center revenue was $2.977 billion, doubling quarter-over-quarter. But about two-thirds of the growth came from price increases.
Demand is still there, and the bull market hasn't been killed by a single down day.
Ordinary investors should wait: can the price hikes continue, and can data center growth support the valuation? Don't rush to bottom-fish yet~
#StorageStocksDropAfterEarnings, #IsTheAIStorageBullMarketStillStable?, #USStockEarnings, #AIStorage, #TechForOrdinaryPeople#AIMemoryBullTest #FedHawksVsWeakJobs #SpaceXUnlockRebound BTC and ETH options contracts worth over $2.4 billion will settle today at 16:00, marking the largest concentrated expiration event in recent times. According to Greeks.live data, 32,000 BTC options expire with a nominal value of $2.06 billion, a put/call ratio of only 0.26, and a maximum pain point of $64,000. During the same period, 177,000 ETH options expired, with a nominal value of $340 million, a put/call ratio of 0.77, and a maximum pain point of $1,900. Key signal interpretation: First, extremely low PCR exposure structural fragility. BTC's Put/Call Ratio remains at a low of 0.26, indicating extremely low put option open interest and a lack of systemic downside protection in the market. This also indicates that the market is not adequately prepared for downside risks, and if a negative shock occurs, it may trigger asymmetric fluctuations. If the market direction turns downward, positions lacking hedging protection will face greater adjustment pressure. Second, the maximum pain point is 64,000, which highly overlaps with spot prices. BTC fluctuated around $64,000 this week and has traded in this range for over two months. The biggest pain point closely overlaps with the spot price, meaning option sellers have the incentive to keep prices near this area before delivery, maximizing counterparty losses and reducing their own losses. This partly explains why the price has been sideways this week. Third, above 65K, a heavy resistance zone is formed. The price range above $65,000 represents the weight of the early rebound#存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？ Employment hasn't collapsed, so the Fed won't rush to cut rates; but with employment cooling down, the pressure to continue raising rates is also reduced.
Looking at the latest set of U.S. employment data together: July ADP private sector added only 44,000 jobs (expected about 75,000), showing a clear slowdown in hiring; but initial jobless claims are 199,000, staying below 200,000 for three consecutive weeks, indicating no large-scale layoffs by companies. This is a typical "low hiring, low layoffs" scenario—it's hard to find people, but no one is being fired en masse.
This situation is most comfortable for the Fed: if employment is too strong → inflation can't be brought down → rate hikes are needed; if employment collapses → recession fears → markets sell off first. Now it's stuck in the middle, the economy hasn't crashed, inflation pressure has no excuse to tighten further, so interest rates will most likely remain unchanged, waiting for subsequent CPI and nonfarm payroll data.
For BTC, this is an awkwardly favorable zone. Rate hike expectations were knocked down by ADP, U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar weakened short-term, easing liquidity pressure, benefiting BTC and gold—just look, gold has already reacted first, and $BTC hovering around 64,000 is also catching some of the glow.
Next, watch these three lines:
Friday's July nonfarm payrolls: consensus about 83,000, below 80,000 → rate cut trades continue, BTC likely to rise; above 100,000 → rate hike talk returns, pressure mounts.
U.S. 10-year Treasury yield: whether it can fall back from around 4.69% will determine if the valuation recovery of risk-free assets can continue.
Market swings on September rate pricing: currently, the probability of a September rate hike is still around 55%, which will be re-evaluated once nonfarm payrolls are released.
In short: what the market wants now is not bad news, but "just the right amount of bad news"—employment weakens a bit more, but not so much as to cause a recession. In that case, BTC and gold both have a chance; if data suddenly deteriorates, the logic will flip from "rate cut is good" to "economy is doomed," which would be life-threatening rather than a gift.
(The above is a macro review and not a trading instruction; manage your contract positions and stop losses carefully) Western Union connects stablecoins, Solana, and Visa payment scenarios, which is more practical than many public chain narratives.
It's not just about issuing another stablecoin. What Western Union really wants to do is integrate on-chain dollars into its original remittance network: user receipts, offline cashing, merchant spending, and cross-border settlement, all trying to avoid being stuck by bank business days and correspondent bank chains.
What stablecoins have always lacked is not on-chain transfer speed, but the "last mile."
You can receive funds in 3 seconds, but if the other party can't get local cash, swipe a card, or pass compliance, then it's just a number in a wallet. Western Union's strength lies in its existing global outlets and risk control network, now using stablecoins as a backend settlement layer.
The real breakthrough is not shouting Web3, but making users not need to know they are using blockchain at all.
#西联稳定币卡落地，Visa支付场景再推进 #AIMemoryBullTest #FedHawksVsWeakJobs #SpaceXUnlockRebound $ETH has been hovering around 1900 these past couple of days, which is really frustrating.
Sometimes it drops to 1890, making it feel like it’s about to break down;
then it pulls back again, making both short and long positions uncomfortable.
But the more I think about it, the more I feel that the biggest issue for ETH right now might not be whether it can break 2000.
It’s whether it will continue to pay "interest" to so many people in the future.
The staking yield plan that the community is arguing about basically means: the more people stake, the less new ETH is issued.
Those holding but not staking are obviously happy—they no longer have to watch their holdings slowly get diluted.
But on the other side, those relying on stETH, re-staking, and lending loops to earn yields are suffering.
If yields thin out, the whole playbook has to be recalculated.
It’s like a cake that used to be big enough for everyone to share, but now more and more people want a slice.
Some say the slices should be smaller to preserve the cake;
others say if you cut less, it must be my slice that shrinks.
Even the Ethereum Foundation itself has staked 70,000 ETH natively, showing that ETH is no longer just a coin waiting to appreciate—it’s becoming an interest-bearing asset.
But here lies the problem:
ETH wants more people to hold it,
but can’t have everyone rushing to stake;
it wants to reduce issuance, but can’t push small nodes away.
So tonight’s macro data will decide the short-term movement,
but what really affects ETH’s valuation going forward might be this debate over "who really gets the yields."
Whether 1900 holds is important.
But who gets to take ETH’s yields might be even more important.
$ETH #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？ #联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？ #财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ If $SPCX earnings report is positive and unlocking is not negative
Then what everyone should pay attention to is not the negative side but the positive side
Some say the negative has already ended, but actually it hasn't
Having chips doesn't mean you have to sell on the first day; the second or third day is also fine
One phrase "I think so" trapped so many people above 120?
With 910 million shares of chips, as long as there is one negative condition
This will snowball and create panic
I said exit at 105, still 0.3 short, now it's 114, I'm not in a hurry
Not everyone is a firm holder
They are just watching #财报观察员：业绩喜忧参半，解禁将至！SpaceX后续怎么看？ How is it? What I said early this morning
$SPCX pumping was a bull trap to lure entries
Now it has dropped back to 110, all the gains from a few days ago are gone
I opened a position at 110, it peaked at 130, now back to 110
The first unlock is at 9:30 tonight, panic is definitely present
The largest unlock doesn't mean all 910 million shares will be sold
But if 100-200 million shares are sold at the current price
Then the price might fall back to the 100-105 range
Where there is panic, there are buyers bottom-fishing; breaking below double digits is just a matter of time
Why? Because there are multiple unlocks in August, and also in September
#财报观察员：业绩喜忧参半，解禁将至！SpaceX后续怎么看？ 📊 $XRP Contract Liquidation Express (August 8)
According to liquidation data, longs and shorts are repeatedly battling, with whales harvesting back and forth...
Liquidation amount in the past 1 hour is about $96,000
Long liquidations about $1,198.59
Short liquidations about $94,800
Liquidation amount in the past 4 hours is about $322,700
Long liquidations about $205,300
Short liquidations about $117,500
Liquidation amount in the past 12 hours is about $7,580,700
Long liquidations about $7,436,700
Short liquidations about $144,000
Liquidation amount in the past 24 hours is about $9,645,800
Long liquidations about $9,454,500
Short liquidations about $191,200
From the $XRP liquidation data, in the 1-hour window, short liquidations overwhelmingly surpass longs, shorts are 79 times longs, a short squeeze blitzkrieg with nuclear-level intensity at the start; in 4 hours, the short advantage sharply narrows, ratio drops to 1.75 times, short squeeze momentum marginally weakens; in 12 hours, the direction completely reverses, long liquidations crush shorts, longs are 51.6 times shorts, a full-scale long liquidation outbreak; in 24 hours, long liquidations soar to $9.45 million, 49.4 times shorts, whales have completed a fierce turnaround from short squeeze to long liquidation on XRP — short-term short chasing is targeted for destruction, mid-to-long-term long chasing is wiped out, cumulative liquidations exceed $9.64 million. Longs are bleeding heavily, the long liquidation market is unstoppable. Everyone control your positions well, don’t get harvested back and forth.
🔥 Market Weather Vane | August 8
Today’s three hot topics point to the same theme: the market has entered the "expectations maxed out, flaws must be punished" phase — "exceeding expectations" is just the baseline, any signal of slowing growth will be amplified.
💾 Storage Stocks Drop After Earnings: The Better the Performance, the Harder the Fall
SanDisk delivered a "legendary" earnings report: Q4 revenue $8.965 billion, up 372% year-over-year; Western Digital’s revenue for the same period was $3.747 billion. SK Hynix’s Q2 revenue was 79.32 trillion KRW, up 557% year-over-year.
However, SanDisk plunged nearly 8% after hours. The culprit was guidance — next quarter’s revenue midpoint at $10.55 billion, below market expectations of $10.82 billion. The market’s pricing logic for storage stocks has shifted from "how good the performance is" to "whether growth is fast enough."
Is the AI memory bull market still stable? UBS predicts total storage industry revenue will reach $992 billion in 2026, nearly doubling to $1.76 trillion in 2027, with HBM as the core driver. But short-term pullbacks are also real — as of end-July, AI storage leaders’ average drawdown was about 40%; in July, SK Hynix’s Korean stock had a max drawdown of 54%, Samsung Electronics 42%, SanDisk plunged 47% in one month. The long-term logic of the super cycle remains intact, but valuations have run ahead of fundamentals, and any flaw will be magnified.
🏛️ Fed Hawkish Signals Heat Up: Weak Employment Can’t Suppress Inflation Anxiety
The July FOMC meeting saw the first three dissenting votes in the same direction since 2016 — three regional Fed presidents advocated a 25 basis point rate hike. Voter Kashkari even said three hikes this year "are not impossible."
Can weak employment suppress inflation? July ADP new jobs were only 44,000, the weakest since January. But wage growth remained high at 4.4%, and the ISM services PMI price component soared to 70.3, the highest in four months — "weak employment, strong prices" forms a classic stagflation signal. The market still prices a 54.9% chance of a rate hike in September.
🚀 SpaceX Rises After Unlock: A Classic Script of Bad News Being Fully Priced In
On August 6, SpaceX’s first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares unlocked, potentially releasing about $100 billion in market value. The market had widely expected a sell-off.
Instead, the stock rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. The 13.6% plunge after earnings on Wednesday had already priced in the unlocking pressure; new sell orders were effectively absorbed by bargain hunters and short covering. The market played out the classic script of "bad news fully priced equals good news." But the alert is not over — another 319 million shares may unlock on August 20, and about 700 million more are expected in September.
💎 Summary
SanDisk’s 372% growth was exchanged for a plunge, proving storage stock valuations have run ahead of fundamentals; the Fed is caught between weak employment and high inflation, stagflation signals are emerging; SpaceX’s counter-trend rise on unlock day played out the classic "bad news fully priced" script. When beating expectations becomes standard, every deviation in guidance will be infinitely magnified — old logics are collapsing, new pricing power is forming, and it punishes all "imperfect" answers. #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ What SpaceX launched today was not a rocket, but potential sell-off pressure
SpaceX released its first earnings report since going public: quarterly revenue was about $7.81 billion, a 92% year-over-year increase, with Starlink users doubling to 12 million; however, the company still posted a net loss of about $541 million, and AI-related capital expenditures have also raised market concerns that "the speed of making money can't keep up with the speed of burning cash." I went long before the earnings and caught a bit of the rise, but after-hours it plunged and gave back most of the gains, which was like personally experiencing a bumpy reentry capsule.
More importantly, today up to 911.5 million shares held by employees and early investors became eligible for sale, accounting for about 12% of the total shares outstanding. Note, this means "can sell," not that all have been sold. I am watching support at $100–105, the strong/weak boundary at $108–110, and resistance at $115. After the bad news is well known, the most dangerous move might actually be shorting. Do you think there will be a selling wave today, or a short squeeze after the bad news settles? $SPCX
#SpaceX #SPCX #USStocks This is not investment advice.I am Brother Ci. At 8:30 tonight, the non-farm payroll data will be released. The market has been hovering around 64750 all day, indicating that the market is waiting for this result. Let's first look at some key numbers. Non-farm preview: What is the market expecting? The US July non-farm employment report will be released tonight at 20:30. The market consensus expects an increase of about 80,000 jobs, higher than June's 57,000. Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal have a more precise expectation of about 83,000. The unemployment rate is expected to remain unchanged at 4.2%, and average hourly earnings are expected to increase by 0.3% month-over-month and 3.5% year-over-year. Economists' forecast ranges are very wide, from 10,000 to 140,000. Vanguard Group expects employment growth to be only 18,000, while some optimistic institutions see over 100,000. This divergence itself indicates that tonight's data carries great uncertainty. Wednesday's ADP data has already alerted the market. The ADP private employment data released on Wednesday showed an increase of only 44,000, far below the expected 75,000, marking the lowest growth this year. ADP is always regarded as a leading indicator for non-farm payrolls, and this time the data gap is very obvious. Some analyses point out that if the data for the previous two months is revised downward by 80,000 in total, the market will see not a mild cooling but a rapidly deteriorating employment trend. Meanwhile, initial jobless claims remain low, indicating that while companies are slowing hiring, they are reluctant to lay off existing employees. ADP weakening but initial claims stable shows a clear hot and cold split in the job market. What the market is really waiting for is for the non-farm payrolls to break this deadlock. Institutional views: Ernst & Young Paitain Consulting believes that, $ALLO It surged a lot today. I bought the bottom a few days ago, and now I've broken even. Personally, I think the probability of losing money by chasing in now is relatively low. Why is that? Let's take a closer look at the price movement of this coin. If we look closely, if you chase in during the first wave of the coin's rise, based on the previous two rebounds, no matter where you buy in, you are unlikely to lose money. Of course, we can't guarantee it will look like this every time. I can only say, based on the previous two times, it was like this. —————————————————— Let's look at the contract data for this coin. We can see that although $ALLO's price has risen a lot today, its contract long-short ratio remains high, and contract open interest has not increased significantly. I believe this shows that there aren't many people shorting him right now, at least not yet at the level of pressure that could cause it to crash before. It's like a balloon—still in the inflating stage, not yet to the extent it did before. All I can say is, at the same level before, it's not yet at its peak. But I don't know if the situation with this coin has changed somewhat. If someone suddenly pricked a balloon with a needle, it might explode. For example, in the previous $H case, many people were doing well after being long, but suddenly a hacking incident occurred. Then $H plummeted. —————————————————— I currently do not plan to take profits. Personally, I playHere’s how I’m looking at $SPCX right now.
If the earnings report comes in good and the unlock doesn’t turn into a mess, then stop staring at the risks. Focus on what can actually drive this higher.
A lot of people are calling the bottom in. Saying the bad news is over. It’s not. Not yet.
Just because you have chips doesn’t mean you have to dump them on day one. You can sell on day two. Day three. Be patient.
That one line “I think so” trapped a ton of people above 120. Don’t let hopium do that to you again.
There are 910 million shares sitting in that unlock. It only takes one negative headline for that to snowball into real panic selling.
I called the exit at 105. We missed it by 0.3. Now we’re at 114 and I’m not rushing.
Not everyone is a diamond hand. Most people are just watching, waiting for a reason to sell.
So watch the report. Watch the unlock. If both come through clean, the upside is what matters. If one thing breaks, this gets fast.
#SpaceXUnlockRebound $BICO #FedHawksVsWeakJobs #AIMemoryBullTest $ETH The Hormuz Agreement just showed signs of progress but got stuck by triple constraints, oil prices rebounded over 5% in three days — Old Mo tells you that geopolitical risk premiums don’t dissipate so easily
Brothers, last week we thought the strait would open soon, but looking at Monday this week, it’s all nonsense.
The agreement indeed made progress, but it’s a different matter from "navigation."
On August 5, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei announced that Iran and Oman have agreed on the geographic coordinates of the proposed route through the Strait of Hormuz, and the joint statement has entered the final review stage. Deputy Foreign Minister Gharibabadi said the original two north-south routes will be closed, and a new temporary route passing through Iranian territorial waters will be used, expected to last 2 to 4 months.
But Iran also made it clear — the strait will not immediately reopen. Iranian parliament official Goudarzi explicitly stated that negotiations are only between Iran and Oman, and the U.S. is not allowed to participate. A Revolutionary Guard source was even more direct: as long as the U.S. continues to intervene and issue military threats to Iran, the agreement cannot be reached.
U.S. sanctions, insurance clauses, and international law — triple constraints simultaneously choke the process.
Industry insiders revealed that the proposed agreement would grant Tehran control over vessels entering the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz. But any fee measures would trigger major compliance issues — the U.S. has sanctioned the "Persian Gulf Strait Authority" responsible for operating the waterway on Iran’s behalf. The U.S. Treasury also prohibits U.S. personnel from accepting services related to "safe passage" provided by the Iranian government.
Insurance is even harsher. The London Lloyd’s Market Association introduced new clauses at the end of July: if a vessel pays any transit fees to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, insurance coverage will be terminated. An insurance industry insider described shipping companies as caught in a typical "dilemma" — Iran demands fees, but insurance rules prohibit coverage for vessels that have paid.
Iran demands 5% to 7% of cargo value, Oman discusses about 3%, and the U.S. insists on restoring pre-war free navigation. Payments may trigger sanctions, and war risk insurance may immediately become invalid after payment — even if a political agreement is reached, it may not be implemented.
The market is repricing risk.
Brent crude fell to $79.36 on August 4 due to ceasefire expectations, then rebounded to $83.48 on August 7 amid disputes over transit conditions and security incidents. WTI rebounded from $75.77 to $78.84 in the same period. Brent has retaken the key technical level of $83 per barrel.
After explosions near Qeshm Island, Iran claimed to have attacked "hostile targets" inside the strait. The Houthi forces launched large-scale attacks on Yemen’s pro-Saudi troops, threatening Saudi oil tankers, the Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea routes. Middle East geopolitical risks are expanding from a single strait blockade to a large-scale regional threat covering energy production, refining, and transportation nodes.
Back to BTC and ETH.
BTC latest price about 64355, down 0.67% in 24 hours. ETH at 1905, down 0.40%.
The oil price rebound means inflation expectations are heating up again, which pressures risk asset valuations. But rising geopolitical risks simultaneously boost safe-haven demand — BTC is being pulled back and forth between these two forces.
Key levels: BTC resistance above 64800-65000, support at 64100-64200, break below sees 63800. ETH resistance above 1920-1950, support at 1850-1870.
Old Mo says a few honest words.
Last week the market was still betting "the strait will open soon, oil prices will crash soon," but this week it turns out to be an illusion. Iran wants control, the U.S. wants free passage, insurance companies refuse coverage — the three parties’ demands have formed a deadlock. Brent’s rebound from 79 to 83 is a correction of the wrong pricing of "agreement equals navigation."
For BTC, the chain of oil price rebound → rising inflation expectations → Fed not daring to ease easily is still intact. But rising geopolitical risks also push up safe-haven demand. Which force prevails depends on the August 12 CPI.
In terms of operations: before direction is clear, keep light positions, wait for signals, don’t bet on direction. BTC can lightly try longs if it stabilizes on a pullback to 64100-64200, stop loss below 63800, target 64800-65000. If volume breaks below 63800 or even 63500, control your hands and don’t bottom fish. ETH similarly watch 1850-1870 for stabilization to go long, stop loss below 1830, target 1920-1950.
How do you think this Hormuz drama will end? Let’s chat in the comments.
If you think Old Mo explained it clearly, give a like and follow. I’ll alert you first when key levels arrive. $BTC $ETH $BICO #伊朗阿曼通航协议遇阻，油价风险再升温 Uniswap’s pools.trade launch on Robinhood Chain matters less as another venue than as a test of whether issuance and secondary liquidity can become one continuous process. Linking token creation directly to Uniswap v4 pools, with a 0.25% LP fee and part of fees automatically added to liquidity, gives that thesis a concrete structure.
The early figures are notable: v4 volume reached roughly $73.6M on day one, while Hayden Adams said cumulative pools.trade volume exceeded $150M by Aug 6. My measured read is that UNI gains a credible growth narrative only if this activity proves durable. Lower costs may deepen liquidity, but pressure on creator economics could limit adoption.
Not advice, just analysis.
#UniswapLaunchpadBet #OKXOrbit📊 $SUI Contract Liquidation Express (August 8)
According to liquidation data, this wave of longs was brutally crushed by the bears...
Time Total Liquidation Long Liquidation Short Liquidation
1 hour $2,469.37 $2,240.28 $229.10
4 hours $44,900 $44,600 $229.10
12 hours $102,900 $100,700 $2,211.95
24 hours $527,500 $518,900 $8,640.03
From the $SUI liquidation data, long liquidations overwhelmingly surpass shorts in 1-hour, 4-hour, 12-hour, and 24-hour periods, with long liquidations being 9.8x, 195x, 45.5x, and 60x that of shorts respectively. The long liquidation wave has been nuclear-level intense throughout all cycles. Long positions were comprehensively targeted and blasted, while shorts' only resistance slightly strengthened in the long term but was negligible. Total liquidations exceeded $520,000. Longs are bleeding heavily; the short squeeze is unstoppable. Everyone, manage your positions carefully to avoid being repeatedly harvested.
🔥 Market Wind Vane | August 8
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the market has entered a "fully priced expectations, flaws will be punished" phase—"exceeding expectations" is just the baseline; any signal of slowing growth will be magnified.
💾 Storage Stocks Drop After Earnings: The Better the Performance, the Harder the Fall
SanDisk delivered a "legendary" earnings report: Q4 revenue $8.965 billion, a 372% YoY surge; Western Digital's revenue for the same period was $3.747 billion. SK Hynix's Q2 revenue was 79.32 trillion KRW, a 557% YoY increase.
However, SanDisk plunged nearly 8% in after-hours trading. The culprit was guidance—next quarter's revenue midpoint of $10.55 billion fell short of the market expectation of $10.82 billion. The market's pricing logic for storage stocks has shifted from "how good the performance is" to "whether growth is fast enough."
Is the AI memory bull market still stable? UBS forecasts total storage industry revenue will reach $992 billion by 2026 and nearly double to $1.76 trillion by 2027, with HBM as the core driver. But short-term pullbacks are also real—as of the end of July, AI storage leaders have averaged about 40% drawdowns; in July, SK Hynix's Korean stock saw a maximum drawdown of 54%, Samsung Electronics 42%, and SanDisk plunged 47% in a single month. The long-term logic of the super cycle remains intact, but valuations have run ahead of fundamentals, so any flaw will be magnified.
🏛️ Fed Hawkish Signals Heat Up: Weak Employment Can't Suppress Inflation Anxiety
The July FOMC meeting saw the first three dissenting votes aligned since 2016—three regional Fed presidents advocated a 25 basis point rate hike. Voter Kashkari even said three hikes this year "are not impossible."
Can weak employment suppress inflation? July ADP job additions were only 44,000, the weakest since January. But wage growth remained high at 4.4%, and the ISM services PMI price component surged to 70.3, the highest in four months—"weak employment, strong prices" forms a classic stagflation signal. The market still prices a 54.9% chance of a rate hike in September.
🚀 SpaceX Rises After Lockup Expiry: A Classic Case of "Bad News Is Good News"
On August 6, SpaceX's first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares unlocked, potentially releasing about $100 billion in market value. The market had widely expected a sell-off.
Instead, the stock rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. The 13.6% plunge after earnings on Wednesday had already priced in the lockup pressure; new sell orders were effectively absorbed by bargain hunters and short covering. The market played out the classic "bad news is good news" script. However, the alert is not over—another 319 million shares may unlock on August 20, and about 700 million more are expected in September.
💎 Summary
SanDisk's 372% growth was met with a plunge, proving storage stock valuations have run ahead of fundamentals; the Fed is caught between weak employment and high inflation, with stagflation signals emerging; SpaceX's counter-trend rise on lockup day played out the classic "bad news is good news" scenario. When beating expectations becomes standard, every deviation in guidance will be infinitely magnified—the old logic is collapsing, new pricing power is forming, and it punishes all "imperfect" answers. #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ Google borrowed $25 billion, and 4 AI geniuses left — this race finally reveals its true face
Yesterday, Alphabet did something.
Issued $25 billion in bonds.
Divided into 10 tranches, ranging from 2 years to 40 years, with the longest tranche yielding 1.3 percentage points higher than Treasury bonds.
And then? Orders flooded in totaling $115 billion.
More than 4 times oversubscribed.
The market went crazy for AI bonds, but — Alphabet’s stock price fell 1.4% that day.
The money was raised, but the market didn’t buy it.
You might ask: $25 billion, is that a lot?
Yes. But compared to Google’s AI bill, it’s not enough.
At the end of July, Alphabet just raised its 2026 capital expenditure forecast to a record $205 billion. More than double 2025’s.
What’s the cost?
For the first time since its 2004 IPO, Google’s free cash flow turned negative in a single quarter.
All the money earned was poured back in, and it still wasn’t enough.
So they issued bonds. $25 billion. Not enough? Issue more.
Since early 2025, Alphabet has raised over $114 billion in bond financing. In the first half of this year alone, debt financing exceeded $50 billion, and nearly $85 billion in stock was issued.
One company, two years, borrowed $200 billion.
All poured into AI.
But that’s not the most painful part.
On the same day as the bond issuance, another event happened.
Google’s Chief Scientist Jeff Dean, after 27 years, left.
He took three top researchers with him.
They founded an AI company called Discovery Loop.
On the same day, DeepMind’s CEO and Nobel laureate Demis Hassabis stepped down from daily management to become Chairman and Chief Scientist.
Nominally a promotion, but in reality — the researchers were pushed out of the decision-making table.
Google split its AI department into three paths: product chasers stay, future thinkers sidelined, and the free spirits leave.
Once the news broke, Alphabet’s stock price dropped more than 5% over two days.
Putting these two events together, the picture becomes clear —
On one side, $25 billion in bonds issued; on the other, 4 AI geniuses leaving.
On one side, frantically pouring money into building data centers, buying computing power, stacking models; on the other, core talent is draining away.
Money flows in, people flow out.
What does this mean?
The AI race has officially entered its second phase.
What was the first phase? Technological breakthroughs. Whoever makes the best model first wins.
Google has Transformer, DeepMind, Jeff Dean — the world’s top technical reserves.
But the second phase competes on two things: capital and talent.
Money, Alphabet has — $205 billion capital expenditure, $114 billion bond financing, and cash on hand.
But talent?
In the past six months, Google’s AI talent has been leaving in batches. Gemini co-lead went to OpenAI, core researchers went to Anthropic. Now even Jeff Dean left.
Who will use the computing centers you spent $200 billion building? Who will iterate the large models you spent $205 billion training?
Will AI competition in the future rely more on technological breakthroughs or financial investment?
My answer is — neither.
The future depends on a virtuous cycle of "having money to keep people, and people to spend money."
Money can buy computing power, but computing power needs people to manage it. People can produce technology, but technology needs money to build.
Missing one is a vicious cycle.
Alphabet’s current situation is — plenty of money, but people are leaving.
Jeff Dean is not the first, nor will he be the last.
When a company’s AI strategy becomes "just throw money at it," what will the real AI experts think?
"My value is not on your balance sheet."
$25 billion can buy servers, but not 27 years of technical faith.
$205 billion can build computing power, but not the next Transformer.
$GOOGL $MSFT $AMZN #谷歌母公司发债250亿美元，AI投入压力升温 Breaking: Russia beats the US to it. 🇷🇺
Putin has officially signed Russia's first comprehensive cryptocurrency regulatory law.
Key points:
• Ordinary investors can buy cryptocurrency through licensed institutions (up to about $3,700 per year)
• Qualified investors have no limit
• Exchanges must be licensed, meet capital requirements, and be regulated
• Cryptocurrency payments are still banned domestically in Russia but allowed for cross-border settlements
• Main provisions will take effect on September 1, 2026.
My view:
This is not Russia embracing Crypto, but rather starting to recognize Crypto as an asset, not a currency.
What’s really worth noting is the last point—allowing cross-border settlements.
Against the backdrop of US dollar settlements increasingly affected by geopolitical factors, cryptocurrency is gradually becoming another settlement tool for international trade, not just a retail speculation target.
Even more interestingly, Russia has completed legislation while the US CLARITY Act is still stuck in the Senate.
If more countries establish compliance frameworks, the valuation logic of Crypto will slowly shift from "speculative asset" to "global financial infrastructure."
My judgment: This is a long-term positive. The short-term impact is limited, but in the coming years, the real beneficiary may not be altcoins, but $BTC. #俄罗斯加密监管法9月生效，交易与支付边界明确 Tonight's Nonfarm Payroll Preview Analysis (Announced at 20:30)
The market expects July nonfarm payrolls to increase by 80,000, previous value 57,000, unemployment rate 4.2%, average hourly earnings month-over-month 0.3%. The leading ADP small nonfarm payrolls were only 44,000, significantly below expectations, casting a shadow of weakness over this nonfarm report. However, the Fed is currently prioritizing inflation, so even if employment cools down, it does not mean an immediate rate cut.
Three Scenario Simulations
1. Nonfarm significantly stronger than expected (>100,000, wages rising)
Employment is hot, reinforcing the maintenance of high interest rates for longer, causing a rebound in the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields. BTC and U.S. tech stocks come under pressure, gold pulls back short-term, and the market re-prices hawkish expectations.
2. Data falls within the expected range 60,000–100,000 (meets expectations)
A tug of war between bulls and bears, no clear one-sided big move. The market will fluctuate repeatedly; focus remains on wage and unemployment rate components, awaiting subsequent inflation data for guidance.
3. Nonfarm clearly weaker (<50,000)
Employment further cools, rate cut expectations rise, the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields decline, benefiting gold and providing rebound momentum for BTC and risk assets.
BTC is already weak on smaller timeframes, with key support below at 63,500–63,000 and core daily bottom formation at 62,500–62,000. Nonfarm data tends to amplify volatility; there will be algorithmic sweeps immediately after the release. Do not chase the first sharp rise or fall directly; wait 5–15 minutes for funds to digest before assessing the true direction. Control position size on nonfarm night; do not heavily bet on the outcome.
Risk Warning: This is only a market logic sharing and does not constitute any investment advice. $BTC $ETH $SNDK #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 The Bitcoin options market appears bearish, but not because traders are rushing to hedge downside risk.
On the contrary, the implied volatility for upside has dropped to a historic low of 23%, indicating that traders are not expecting a strong rebound. This reflects weak bullish sentiment rather than increased concern over further declines. $BTC The South Korean stock index initially opened higher and surged, rebounding from a more than 4% plunge the previous day, reaching as high as 6415 points, looking like it was warming up.
However, foreign investors directly dumped large volumes, causing the market to plunge all the way down to a low of 6158 points, with the late session barely recovering some losses, and the index finally closed down 0.6%.
This week marks the seventh consecutive week of decline, with overall market confidence particularly weak; rebounds are just panic-driven moves with no long-term capital entering.
SK Hynix closed down sharply by 4.88%, being the main culprit dragging down the entire South Korean market.
Trigger for the plunge: rumors circulated that Nvidia's new AI chip will reduce the use of high-end HBM memory, and Hynix is a core supplier of HBM, causing market concerns over shrinking high-end memory orders.
Coupled with SanDisk's disappointing earnings guidance the previous night and a collective plunge in the memory sector, funds panicked and sold off heavily.
Contrast: Samsung Electronics bucked the trend with a slight gain, as funds shifted from high-level memory stocks like Hynix to heavyweight defensive stocks like Samsung.
Foreign investors sold crazily over 60 billion RMB throughout the day; they were still buying in the morning session but reversed to heavy selling within an hour of the open;
Only retail investors and local institutions made small bottom-fishing purchases, unable to withstand the selling pressure from foreign investors, causing the rebound to fail outright.
South Korea's memory leader Hynix's renewed sharp decline will continue to weigh on the sentiment of SanDisk and Micron in the U.S. market overnight.
SanDisk already plunged sharply yesterday due to weak earnings expectations, and today Hynix's further drop makes it difficult for the memory sector to quickly stop falling in the short term, with bearish sentiment persisting.
The morning session seemed to be stabilizing and rebounding, but negative news plus foreign capital flight directly collapsed the market; memory chips remain the hardest hit area, with Hynix breaking down further, continuing to pressure U.S. memory stocks.SOL — On-chain transactions exceed 1 billion, price remains flat!
SOL is reported at $73. On-chain non-voting transactions surpassed 1.01 billion last week, setting a new all-time high. Meme coins contributed 28% of DEX trading volume, and application revenue rebounded 32% from the April low. However, the price is firmly suppressed by the 50-day EMA (79) and 100-day EMA (75) — strong fundamentals but weak price, with the divergence growing larger.
50% continue to consolidate between 72-76; 35% fall below 72 testing 67; 15% break above 76 targeting 79-80. $SOL 📊 $CL Contract Liquidation Express (August 7)
According to liquidation data, this wave of shorts was brutally crushed by the dog whales...
Liquidation amount in the past 1 hour is about $10,700
Long position liquidations about $718.04
Short position liquidations about $9,950.49
Liquidation amount in the past 4 hours is about $69,400
Long position liquidations about $59,300
Short position liquidations about $10,000
Liquidation amount in the past 12 hours is about $132,300
Long position liquidations about $66,300
Short position liquidations about $66,000
Liquidation amount in the past 24 hours is about $892,100
Long position liquidations about $156,600
Short position liquidations about $735,400
From the $CL liquidation data, short position liquidations in 1 hour crushed longs by 13.8 times, with a fierce short squeeze blitz at the start; the 4-hour short advantage expanded, ratio rising to about 5.9 times, with a full outbreak of short squeeze; the 12-hour short advantage sharply narrowed, longs and shorts nearly even, short squeeze momentum near exhaustion; 24-hour short liquidations soared to $735,400, 4.7 times that of longs. The dog whales completed a full-cycle slaughter of shorts on CL—shorts across short, medium, and long terms were comprehensively targeted and liquidated, with cumulative liquidations exceeding $892,000. Shorts are bleeding heavily, and the short squeeze market is unstoppable. Everyone, control your positions and avoid being repeatedly harvested.
🔥 Market Weather Vane | August 8
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the market has entered a "fully priced expectations, flaws are fatal" phase—"exceeding expectations" is just the baseline, and any signal of slowing growth will be magnified.
💾 Storage Stocks Drop After Earnings: The Better the Performance, the Harder the Fall
SanDisk delivered a "legendary" earnings report: Q4 revenue $8.965 billion, a year-over-year surge of 372%; Western Digital's revenue for the same period was $3.747 billion. SK Hynix's Q2 revenue was 79.32 trillion KRW, a year-over-year increase of 557%.
However, SanDisk plunged nearly 8% after hours. The culprit was guidance—the next quarter's revenue midpoint of $10.55 billion fell short of the market expectation of $10.82 billion. The market's pricing logic for storage stocks has shifted from "how good the performance is" to "whether the growth rate is fast enough."
Is the AI memory bull market still stable? UBS predicts total storage industry revenue will reach $992 billion by 2026 and nearly double to $1.76 trillion by 2027, with HBM as the core driver. But short-term pullbacks are also real—as of the end of July, AI storage leaders have averaged a drawdown of about 40%; in July, SK Hynix's Korean stock had a maximum drawdown of 54%, Samsung Electronics 42%, and SanDisk plunged 47% in a single month. The long-term logic of the super cycle remains intact, but valuations have run ahead of fundamentals, and any flaw will be magnified.
🏛️ Fed Hawkish Signals Heat Up: Weak Employment Can't Suppress Inflation Anxiety
The July FOMC meeting saw the first three unanimous dissenting votes since 2016—three regional Fed presidents advocated a 25 basis point rate hike. Voter Kashkari even said three hikes this year "are not impossible."
Can weak employment suppress inflation? July ADP new jobs were only 44,000, the weakest since January. But wage growth remained high at 4.4%, and the ISM services PMI price component soared to 70.3, the highest in four months—"weak employment, strong prices" formed a classic stagflation signal. The market still prices a 54.9% chance of a rate hike in September.
🚀 SpaceX Rises After Lockup Expiry: A Classic Script of "Bad News Fully Priced"
On August 6, SpaceX's first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares were unlocked, potentially releasing a market value of about $100 billion. The market had widely expected a selling wave.
Instead, the stock rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. The 13.6% plunge after earnings on Wednesday had already priced in the lockup pressure; new selling was effectively absorbed by bargain hunters and short covering. The market played out the classic script of "bad news fully priced is good news." However, the alert is not over—another 319 million shares may unlock on August 20, and about 700 million shares are expected to be released in September.
💎 Summary
SanDisk's 372% growth was met with a plunge, proving storage stock valuations have run ahead of fundamentals; the Fed is caught between weak employment and high inflation, with stagflation signals emerging; SpaceX's counter-trend rise on lockup day played out the classic "bad news fully priced" script. When beating expectations becomes standard, every deviation in guidance will be infinitely magnified—the old logic is collapsing, new pricing power is forming, and it punishes all "imperfect" answers. #存储股财报后下挫，AI内存牛市还稳吗？
#联储鹰派信号升温，弱就业能否压过通胀？
#财报观察员：解禁后反涨，SpaceX后续怎么看？ The promised "Crypto Clarity Act" is out of reach again this month. The U.S. Senate has not scheduled a vote and will wait until after reconvening on September 14 before proceeding. The two parties are still tugging, and policy benefits have been delayed again. This kind of storyline has actually been seen many times in the crypto community. Every time, it's always "soon, soon," but what the market gets is a delay. But strangely, while the policy hasn't changed, the money is still moving. On-chain data shows that since July 29, wallets holding 100,000 to 10,000 BTC have cumulatively purchased over 20,000 Bitcoins, valued at about $1.2 billion. Meanwhile, US spot BTC ETFs also attracted about $750 million in inflows this week. What about the price? It is still fluctuating around $64,000. That's the most interesting part now. If big money truly believes the rally is over, why are they still buying shares? Of course, buying does not necessarily mean an increase. Right now, BTC's real resistance is still at the $65,000 level. If it can't be broken, the volatility may continue. Additionally, rising oil prices and the persistently high yield on the US 10-year Treasury note have also put pressure on risk assets. If nonfarm payroll data is expected to be strong, market expectations for rate cuts may cool down again. Bitcoin now is a game of competition. Policies are waiting, whales are laying their ground, and retail investors are watching and waiting.Don't rush to bottom-fish SpaceX yet, the unlocking wave has been ongoing for nearly a year 🚨
Yesterday, SpaceX unlocked 910 million shares, doubling the float from 4.9% to 11.8%, equivalent to selling pressure of 100 billion, yet the stock price barely dropped. Whether this is due to short covering or buying inflows starting after the price nearly halved from its peak, it's too difficult to predict short-term price movements.
What’s more noteworthy is the upcoming unlocking wave. You can see that every two weeks there will be a batch unlocking, especially in November when nearly 10% will unlock at once. The remaining shares will continue unlocking until June 2027, totaling 50% of the float. Meanwhile, Musk will unlock about 46% of the float. Although his sales are restricted by terms, if he really wants to sell, he might bypass this rule through registered offerings.
$SPCX Is UNI about to take off?
#Uniswap进军发射台，UNI能否打开新叙事？
Uniswap is finally no longer satisfied with just being a place to trade after tokens are issued.
This time, it directly reaches to the very front of the project: token issuance, auction pricing, liquidity establishment, and subsequent trading — the entire process can be completed within Uniswap.
When users participate in the auction, they can set a maximum price in advance. Tokens are continuously released by block, and transactions within the same block execute at the same clearing price. At least in terms of mechanism, this is somewhat fairer than competing on speed at the opening or being front-run by bots. Uniswap auction mechanism
Why is this important for UNI?
Previously, Uniswap could only earn trading volume after new tokens were listed. Now it has the chance to capture the earliest funds and users of a project. As long as a project launches here, subsequent pool creation, trading, and market making will most likely remain on Uniswap v4.
More importantly, UNI already has a fee burn mechanism. Starting from December 2025, part of Uniswap’s protocol fees will be used to burn UNI. If the launchpad can continuously generate trading volume, theoretically it will also increase UNI’s value capture. UNI token mechanism
However, don’t get overly optimistic just because of the launchpad.
The easiest thing for token issuance platforms to inflate is the "number of projects," but the hardest to retain is liquidity. Issuing ten thousand tokens a day is not impressive; having people still trading a week later is the real demand.
Next, I will only watch three things: how much money the projects actually raise, how much trading volume remains after seven days of listing, and whether the UNI burn rate accelerates.
If these three can take off, UNI indeed has the chance to evolve from an ordinary governance token into an equity token for an on-chain asset issuance platform.
If only the number of tokens issued is lively but the funds quickly leave, then it’s just an added feature.
So UNI’s new story is here, but whether it can truly take off depends on whether it retains trading volume or just a bunch of new tokens with no buyers.Tonight's Nonfarm Payrolls are coming, and BTC might experience amplified volatility again. Friends, be prepared!
📊 Impact of Nonfarm Payrolls on BTC
• Nonfarm > 80,000, Unemployment Rate ≤ 4.2%
Employment stronger than expected → Fed hawkish expectations rise → USD/US Treasury yields likely strengthen → bearish for BTC
• Nonfarm < 80,000, Unemployment Rate > 4.2%
Employment cooling continues → market bets on looser monetary policy → liquidity expectations improve → bullish for BTC
• Nonfarm ≈ 80,000, Unemployment Rate steady at 4.2%
Basically in line with expectations → no significant macro increment → BTC likely to consolidate first, ultimately returning to technical analysis
⚠️ My judgment on tonight's data: leaning towards "moderate recovery," but not particularly strong.
The market expects about 80,000 new jobs added in July, higher than June's 57,000, but in absolute terms, US employment growth is still not strong.
So what really needs caution tonight is not simply whether Nonfarm is high or low, but:
Nonfarm + Unemployment Rate + Hourly Wages + Previous Data Revisions considered together.
If Nonfarm is slightly above 80,000, but unemployment does not decrease and wages show no obvious warming, I believe this kind of "apparent bearishness" has limited persistence.
But if there is:
Nonfarm significantly exceeding expectations + unemployment rate dropping + wage increases,
then that is a truly hawkish combination, which will clearly increase pressure on BTC.
Personally, I still maintain a bearish bias overall tonight.
Especially since BTC's resistance above has not truly been relieved; if the data is strong and US stocks pull back again, BTC can easily use the Nonfarm event to test downside directly.
Tonight, don't just focus on the first candlestick; the most common Nonfarm pattern is to first spike one way, then reverse sharply the other way.Actually, I have always believed that the Federal Reserve is not as composed as the market imagines. Rate hikes seem more like a political performance before the midterm elections, while rate cuts are the predetermined endgame — no matter how much the performance goes on, it can't change the inevitable conclusion of high interest rates coming to an end, which is also why I have been bullish all along.
Looking at the recent situation in the crypto space, Bitcoin $BTC has been repeatedly testing around $64,000, Ethereum $ETH hovers around $1,900. Weak ADP data once pushed BTC higher, but as hawkish signals reemerged, BTC and ETH fell about 2.8% and 3.6% respectively last week, with net outflows from spot ETFs.
ADP new jobs plunged to 44,000, less than half of last month, but PCE inflation remains high at 3.7%. Amid these conflicting data, Cook and Kashkari took turns calling for rate hikes, but everyone knows these tough words won't last long.
The capital market votes with real money. On August 4, Nvidia and Microsoft each contributed about $700 billion in market value, and the Nasdaq surged 2.13%; but once the probability of rate hikes rose, storage chip stocks plummeted on August 6, with Western Digital down 13%, SanDisk $SNDK down over 6%, and AI software stocks also sharply falling.
Short-term hawkish rhetoric will continue, but once the midterm elections are over, high interest rates must come to an end. Debt pressure and economic slowdown make rate cuts not an option but an inevitability. Nvidia, Western Digital, Bitcoin, Ethereum — all are waiting for that turning point, and that point is actually not far away.
#Fed hawkish signals heat up, can weak employment outweigh inflation? Actually, I have always believed that the Federal Reserve is not as composed as the market imagines. Rate hikes seem more like a political performance before the midterm elections, while rate cuts are the predetermined endgame — no matter how much the performance goes on, it can't change the inevitable conclusion of high interest rates coming to an end, which is also why I have been bullish all along.
Looking at the recent situation in the crypto space, Bitcoin $BTC has been repeatedly testing around $64,000, Ethereum $ETH hovers around $1,900. Weak ADP data once pushed BTC higher, but as hawkish signals reemerged, BTC and ETH fell about 2.8% and 3.6% respectively last week, with net outflows from spot ETFs.
ADP new jobs plunged to 44,000, less than half of last month, but PCE inflation remains high at 3.7%. Amid these conflicting data, Cook and Kashkari took turns calling for rate hikes, but everyone knows these tough words won't last long.
The capital market votes with real money. On August 4, Nvidia and Microsoft each contributed about $700 billion in market value, and the Nasdaq surged 2.13%; but once the probability of rate hikes rose, storage chip stocks plummeted on August 6, with Western Digital down 13%, SanDisk $SNDK down over 6%, and AI software stocks also sharply falling.
Short-term hawkish rhetoric will continue, but once the midterm elections are over, high interest rates must come to an end. Debt pressure and economic slowdown make rate cuts not an option but an inevitability. Nvidia, Western Digital, Bitcoin, Ethereum — all are waiting for that turning point, and that point is actually not far away.
#Fed hawkish signals heat up, can weak employment outweigh inflation? On my blueprint, Alphabet's $25 billion bond is not financing; it's like driving a 40-year steel pile deep into the ground. Ten maturities, from 2 years to 40 years, like ten sets of concrete test blocks with different grades, performing continuous strain tests on the same foundation pile. And the $115 billion subscription orders—four times oversubscribed—mean the market has already completed the static load test for them, and the foundation bearing capacity has passed this time.
But architects never look at money when considering financing; they look at the reinforcement ratio. Capital expenditure in 2026 is raised to $205 billion, meaning the concrete volume of the main structure suddenly nearly doubles. AI infrastructure is not decoration; it is the core tube and load-bearing walls, which cannot be cut during construction—if you cut a layer of reinforcement, the bending moment of the entire structure must be recalculated. The current market debate is: is this a rush to meet landmark construction deadlines, or endless welding of rebar for the landmark?
The biggest fear in building structures is not height but uneven stiffness. Alphabet’s move turns long-term debt into a 40-year memory alloy and short-term capital expenditure into 2-year high-strength, fast-hardening concrete—two materials with different shrinkage rates, inevitably generating thermal stress at the junction. The AI generational speed is too fast; each model iteration is equivalent to embedding new sensors in the concrete; leadership adjustments mean reconnecting sensor readings to different control consoles. When will the readings conflict? When Hassabis’s theoretical rhythm misaligns with Dean’s product rollout schedule, the building’s dampers start to shake.
Looking at personnel changes, this is a typical major overhaul of the chief engineer at the design institute. Hassabis is withdrawn from the DeepMind site to become Alphabet’s Chief Scientist—meaning the main plan creator no longer stays on site but returns to the headquarters to research mechanical models. He used to oversee construction while researching; now he only handles theory and no longer signs off on progress payments for specific sites. If drawings clash on site, they must wait for the headquarters to hold meetings and issue change orders.
Jeff Dean’s Discovery Loop is like a newly designated “elite studio” in the design institute: no fixed staff, pulling old colleagues to work on new projects. The architecture world calls this a “avant-garde office incubator,” which sounds sexy but is actually just a group of senior architects redoing sketches and going through another round of plan reviews. The problem is, their time is also money, counted in the $205 billion construction cost.
The real scene I see is: insufficient tower crane density, concrete mixers queuing, drawings still being "designed while constructing." The AI talent war is a battle for steel structure subcontractors—you want to hang the curtain wall tomorrow, but today you find the welding crew has been poached by a neighboring site with double wages. This is the most expensive phase of capital and also the phase where capital is most likely to fail.
There is an iron rule on construction sites: all the thinking saved to rush work will eventually be repaid doubly through change orders. Google is not short of money or talent—it is building a foundation for a building that could grow to 100 floors, designed for 200 years of durability. DeepMind’s tower cranes are still turning, Discovery Loop’s temporary site office just set up, and the countdown sign on the construction fence reads $205 billion.
This building will not collapse with a crash. It will only be discovered one morning by structural monitors that the first floor has settled beyond the design limit. The tower cranes are still turning, rebar is not yet tied, signal workers hold walkie-talkies, directing the placement of the next steel frame as if nothing has happened. And on my blueprint, the red line area has already marked that crack. #Alphabet25BBond