Orbit Post Sitemap
8-5 Complete Pre-Market Global Information Overview｜Market Contradiction Signals Are Very Prominent
I. Full Picture of U.S. Stock Pre-Market
1. Futures of the three major stock indices all rise: S&P 500 futures lead gains (+0.39%), Nasdaq futures up 0.20%.
2. Leading tech stocks show mixed upward movement: Nvidia rises 2% pre-market, leading the computing power sector; Apple and Google slightly up; Microsoft and Tesla remain flat.
3. Storage chip sector shows serious divergence: Micron and SK Hynix under pressure and falling, SanDisk slightly down -0.55%; Western Digital and Seagate rise, but risk of SanDisk's earnings spike then fall remains to be cautious tonight.
4. Optical communication stocks mixed; traditional telecom sector collectively declines, Verizon plunges 2.9%.
5. Earnings-driven bearish stocks continue adjustment:
• SpaceX down over 10% pre-market: revenue met expectations, but $18 billion huge capital expenditure crushes market confidence, large-scale unlocking imminent on August 6;
- AMD down over 7%, Q2 earnings impressive, but Q3 revenue forecast falls short of market's most optimistic expectations.
II. Commodities: Geopolitical Situation Creates Intense Tug-of-War
1. Crude oil rises against the trend
WTI crude at $75.98 (+0.26%), Brent above $80.
Huge divergence at the root of the situation: Trump stated the strait will open soon and if not, military strikes may be launched; Iran responded directly that U.S. military intervention will cause the navigation agreement to completely collapse. Negotiations deadlocked, oil prices gain safe-haven support. The future of the Strait of Hormuz situation will directly affect inflation expectations.
2. Gold and silver surge strongly
London gold up 2.08%, London silver up sharply 3.52%.
On one hand, repeated Middle East negotiations trigger safe-haven buying; on the other hand, U.S. stock AI earnings disappointments cause some funds to exit high-volatility tech stocks and allocate to precious metals. Silver outperforms gold due to its dual industrial and safe-haven attributes.
III. Other Key International News
1. U.S. Customs has returned about $100 billion in disputed tariffs;
2. Houthi forces attacked Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, raising Red Sea shipping risks again;
3. Russian e-commerce sorting center hit by drone attack, multiple geopolitical risks erupting.
IV. Overall Market Logic Summary
The current market is full of fragmentation: stock index futures warming up, Nvidia strengthening represents long-term sentiment in computing power still present; but SpaceX and AMD earnings cool, storage sector weakens, short-term AI hardware funds fleeing.
Deadlock in Middle East strait negotiations is today's biggest variable, verbal confrontations between U.S. and Iran, oil price rebound drives precious metals strength.
#财报观察员：业绩喜忧参半，解禁将至！SpaceX后续怎么看？ $BTC The thing I don't like most about cutting issuance discourse is lack of positive vision for Ethereum validator set. Original design was not prescient enough, but has clear design goals: hundreds of thousands of individual stakers, running Ethereum all across the world.
Status quo proponents also have a version of positive vision - e.g. Lido has built community staking, is decentralizing and geographically distributing validator set. We're successfully making a staking protocol that can bring Ethereum closer to original goals via opinionated, non-neutral decisions that base protocol can't adopt.
Cutting is just "do it or it's going to get worse", no clear vision of good validator set we're solving for. They're given up on original vision, but don't want to clearly admit it and offer a new one.#EarningsRealityCheck #SpaceXBeatEstimates #AMDBeatsButDrops US-Iran negotiations are advancing while simultaneously facing tough confrontation, the market is repricing geopolitical risk
The US-Iran situation is once again fluctuating.
On one hand, US President Trump has sent positive signals, stating that US-Iran negotiations are making progress and hinting at a possible phased result within the next 48 hours.
On the other hand, the US maintains a tough stance, emphasizing that if Iran withdraws from negotiations, more severe measures will be taken.
Iran responded by saying it will not reach an agreement under military threats and pressure.
Currently, both sides are in a very typical state:
Negotiations have not stopped, but the game is not over.
Godfather's perspective:
I believe the core of current market trading is not "whether peace will come immediately."
But rather:
Will both sides ultimately choose to de-escalate or continue to escalate?
Because for financial markets, the biggest fear is not the conflict itself, but the continuous expansion of uncertainty.
1. Why is the market highly sensitive to US-Iran news?
In recent times, the market has been pricing Middle East risks.
Especially the Strait of Hormuz.
As a crucial global energy transportation channel, once supply risks emerge, the market's first reaction is:
Oil prices rise.
Inflation expectations heat up.
Risk assets come under pressure.
So every time negotiations ease, funds will preemptively withdraw some safe-haven positions;
And every time conflict escalates, risk premiums quickly return.
Market trading is never about what happened today.
But rather:
Whether risks will further expand in the coming days and weeks.
2. Where is the biggest current contradiction?
The biggest problem now is:
The US wants to force Iran to concede through pressure.
While Iran believes it cannot accept an agreement under military threats.
This means:
There is a negotiation window.
But the trust foundation is insufficient.
So in the short term, it is more likely to see:
Eased news → market optimism;
Negotiation obstacles → risk heating up again.
Repeated tug-of-war may become the main rhythm.
3. What impact does this have on the market?
If negotiations continue:
Energy risk premiums may further decline.
Oil prices come under pressure.
Safe-haven funds decrease.
Sentiment for stocks, crypto assets, and other risk assets may recover.
But if negotiations break down:
The market may reprice conflict escalation.
Oil prices rise.
Inflation expectations rebound.
Federal Reserve policy pressure increases.
Risk assets face pressure again.
For BTC, the short term is more influenced by fund sentiment.
Geopolitical risk easing is favorable for risk appetite recovery.
But what truly determines the medium- to long-term trend remains:
ETF fund flows.
Institutional allocation.
Macro liquidity.
Market incremental funds.
Currently, US-Iran is not ending the conflict but engaging in a high-stakes game. Peace expectations will suppress risk premiums, but any negotiation stalemate may cause the market to reprice war risk. Going forward, the focus is not on who shouts the loudest but who is truly willing to make concessions for an agreement. $BTC $BTC
Many people think that the recent sale of $BTC by the Trump family is bearish, but one possibility is that they reduced their holdings to comply with the Ethics clause, which is a prerequisite for the Clarity Act to pass.
Everyone knows that we are currently in the bottom range of the BTC bear market, and the Trump family naturally knows this too. Selling at this time might be a form of "sacrifice."
If the Clarity Act unexpectedly passes, it could trigger an epic bull market rush.$ENA was purchased on the morning of August 3rd at around 6 AM at an average price of 0.0873 for 6 million tokens, with a total value of 524,000 USD. The current total holding is 9.05 million tokens, planned for long-term holding.
This morning, it was noticed that wallets associated with #panteracapital (an early institutional round investor) and several other institutional accounts began large-scale bulk transfers, involving a total of 150 million tokens, with a total value of 13.88 million USD.
A brief explanation for those unfamiliar with this coin:
ENA is the native governance token of the decentralized stablecoin protocol Ethena. You can think of it as the "management key" to the entire Ethena ecosystem; holders can vote on decisions regarding the protocol's future development.
Behind it is a protocol called Ethena, which attempts to create a "synthetic dollar" USDe that does not rely on the traditional banking system using an innovative financial approach, and allows this system itself to generate revenue.
$ETH #财报观察员：业绩喜忧参半，解禁将至！SpaceX后续怎么看？ Bitcoin just sat through another all-time high session in global equities and barely flinched.
While the S&P 500 and MSCI World printed fresh records on AI enthusiasm, $BTC held a tight range near $64,000. Equities ripped higher. Crypto mostly watched. That divergence is the real story today.
The cleanest macro catalyst this week is the reported progress toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude already slid on the prospect. Cheaper oil reduces inflation pressure and softens the higher-for-longer rate narrative that has kept risk assets under wraps. If an actual deal lands, liquidity conditions improve across the board. Crypto has historically reacted strongly once that pressure lifts.
Yet the market is still digesting its own internal signals. Spot Bitcoin ETF flows turned positive again, led by solid inflows into the largest products. Institutional money is still showing up even while price consolidates almost 50% below the prior cycle high. $ETH continues to lag the majors on the weekly view. $SOL, $BNB, and $XRP have been relatively steadier. $ADA has shown relative strength over the past week. Meanwhile smaller names and high-beta names like $DOGE, $AVAX, $DOT, $LINK, $UNI, $ATOM, $NEAR, $SUI and $HYPE are swinging harder as traders rotate capital in a low-conviction tape.
My read: the buyers are selective right now. They are willing to accumulate $BTC on dips and defend key levels, but they are not yet chasing the broader market higher the way they usually do when equities break out. That tells me positioning is still cautious and that any sustained move will need clearer confirmation on the macro front or a decisive break in volume.
The Hormuz development is the one to watch closely. A confirmed de-escalation removes a major energy risk premium. If crypto still fails to respond while stocks keep climbing, it will signal that the current consolidation is more about crypto-specific flows than pure macro. Either way, the setup is getting tighter.
The next few sessions will show whether this quiet range is accumulation or simple indifference.Bitcoin stuck at 64,000 but the line is forming for those betting it will break 60,000 in August
Bitcoin is currently stuck around 64,000, unable to go up or down, but on the prediction market, people betting it will fall below 60,000 this month are already lining up. Traders on Kalshi have been wildly betting on an August close below 60,000, with positions at 57,500 and 55,000 also increasing, signaling a potential shift.
The technical levels themselves are tangled. The 15-day moving average is pressing at 64,200, the 200-week moving average is close to 63,700, and the cost basis for 515,000 BTC is stacked at the 63,000 barrier, with another 362,000 coins piled at 61,000. About 155,000 coins have changed hands between 62,000 and 65,000, showing strong support from major players. However, the 30-day implied volatility has dropped to 36%, the lowest since the end of May. Everyone feels calm, but the quieter it is, the easier it is for a one-sided move to happen. Traders see 60,000 as a critical support, with 64,700 and 71,000 as two strong resistances above.
Traders Killa and Daan Crypto have both warned that extreme compression will inevitably lead to a breakout. August has historically been a weak month, with a median return of -7.49%, and liquidity shortages often trigger shakeouts. Axel Adler from CryptoQuant gave a probability estimate: there is a 55% chance Bitcoin will fluctuate between 58,000 and 67,000 in August, a 30% chance of bearish movement, and only 15% chance of bullish movement. This Friday’s non-farm payroll report and progress on the Hormuz agreement are two imminent triggers that could break the range.
The most interesting contrast is next door. The US stock market’s S&P and Dow just hit new highs, Palantir surged nearly 30% in one day, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose over 6%, but Bitcoin stubbornly did not follow. Coinbase has had a negative premium for 79 consecutive days since May 19, showing weak domestic buying pressure in the US. The big short seller Burry hasn’t been idle either, warning that the US stock market may be near a major top, with a risk of a crash similar to 1987. Short positions remain open on semiconductor ETFs, Micron, Nvidia, Caterpillar, Palantir, Tesla, and Applied Materials, with Nvidia’s bearish options even extended to June 2027.
Spot ETFs still saw net inflows yesterday, with BTC attracting 211 million and ETH 53.74 million, but mining companies Cipher and Hut8 reported poor earnings, dropping 15.65% and 9.74% respectively, while PUMP in the top 100 actually rose 12%. One market is partying, the other is playing dead — which side are you betting on? $11.5 billion revenue, data center doubling, yet AMD plunged 9% after hours——
This script is all too familiar to crypto folks
Revenue $11.536 billion, up 50% year-over-year, a record high.
Earnings per share $1.66, beating the expected $1.62.
Data center business $6.7 billion, up 107% year-over-year, accounting for 58% of total revenue.
Q3 guidance $13 billion, higher than Wall Street's average expectation of $12.5 billion.
For any company, this would be a legendary earnings report.
AMD fell 9% after hours.
It rose 7% during regular trading hours, then wiped out gains and more after hours.
Doesn't it feel like your altcoin just had a better-than-expected positive news, then got dumped?
Doesn't it feel like you were staring at the candlestick at 3 a.m., and the moment the good news landed, it plunged precisely?
Why did AMD fall——
First: Capital expenditure exploded.
Q2 capex was $808 million, market expected only $298.6 million.
They spent three times the money on AI infrastructure. The market thought—wow, all that money is spent, where's the profit? What about gross margin?
Second: Gross margin stayed flat.
Q3 gross margin guidance is 56%, same as Q2.
For a fast-growing AI chip company, the market wants gross margin to keep expanding, not stagnate. AI GPU gross margins are already low; if overall gross margin can't rise, why should investors give you a higher valuation?
Third: Guidance is "not impressive enough."
Q3 guidance of $13 billion beats Wall Street's average $12.5 billion—but some buyers had bet on $13.5 to $14 billion.
"Beating the average but not the most optimistic"—that's the whole reason for the drop.
An analyst said: a typical 'sell the news' moment, AI chip stocks are already priced to perfection.
The market just says: Is that it?
AMD's stock price has more than doubled this year. Valuation is sky-high; the market wants not just "good," but "explosive." Not "beat expectations," but "crush expectations."
Anything "less than perfect" is bearish.
That's why $11.5 billion revenue and 107% data center growth earned a 9% beating.
At high valuation, "meeting expectations" is the biggest disappointment.
At high valuation, "slightly beating expectations" equals "not beating expectations enough."
At high valuation, the script where good news is fully priced in always arrives before the script where good news is realized.
The next one to fall victim to "selling on good news" might be the coin in your hand.One of the sharpest $USDT contractions in crypto history is happening right now.
60-day change: -$4 billion.
Last 11 days: -$870 million in supply.
Why it matters: stablecoins are the market's most immediate source of buying power.
When USDT shrinks, there is less capital available to absorb selling and fuel recoveries.
That is why $BTC Bitcoin's rebounds keep losing steam.
A real recovery needs $USDT to stop contracting and start expanding again.Upside down Tiangang! Apple $AAPL $XAAPL, known for aggressive price cutting, was told "no" by Changxin Memory this time.
According to South Korean IT media reports, Apple recently negotiated with Changxin Memory for LPDDR5X and other mobile DRAM supplies, hoping to reduce the manufacturing costs of the next-generation iPhone and other smart devices by lowering purchase prices.
However, Changxin reportedly refused to lower prices in this negotiation and insisted that their quotes could not be lower than those of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.
The core reason Changxin dares to reject Apple is that it already has enough orders in hand.
Domestic manufacturers like Huawei and Xiaomi have locked in capacity through long-term contracts in advance, allowing Changxin to avoid relying on low prices to win Apple’s orders.
In the past, suppliers competed for Apple; now Apple is competing for limited memory capacity.
The bigger background to this news is that AI is changing the global memory market.
Samsung and SK Hynix are shifting more resources toward high-margin products like HBM4 and enterprise SSDs, tightening the supply of regular DRAM accordingly.
Capacity is being absorbed by AI, naturally strengthening the bargaining power of memory manufacturers.
This may not just be an ordinary procurement negotiation but also signifies that Changxin is transitioning from a "low-price challenger" to a mainstream supplier with pricing confidence.
For Apple, procurement costs and supply chain diversification will face a new balance; for the memory industry, general DRAM prices may also receive further support.
However, neither Apple nor Changxin has publicly confirmed the negotiation details yet. Refusing to lower prices does not mean the cooperation is terminated. The final outcome will depend on the interplay of price, capacity, certification progress, and other factors. $BICO Spot is executing a massive upside breakout today, surging +20.84% to trade at 0.02551.
The daily timeframe shows a strong green expansion candle pushing past key moving averages, mapping a 24-hour window between an intraday low of 0.01672 and a peak high of 0.02847.
Desk turnover has expanded rapidly to 5.48M USDT across a 24-hour spot volume of 242.23M $BICO .
Moving averages are lagging beneath the price action, with VWMA5 at 0.01995, VWMA10 at 0.01957, and VWMA20 at 0.01892.
Reinforced by a green daily Supertrend support line climbing at 0.01652, bulls have cleanly reversed off the structural base floor at 0.01125 and are pressing against overhead supply around the 0.02847 wick.
#DailyOrbit @OKX中文 The core logic of the market tonight remains unchanged.
The US stock AI and semiconductor sectors continue to surge strongly, with QQQ rising over 3%. Tech stocks such as INTC, MU, MRVL, SNDK, MSTR are all broadly strengthening. Meanwhile, gold and silver are rising in tandem, VIX remains low, and market risk appetite is still relatively high.
International oil prices have plunged nearly 8%. With progress in negotiations between Iran and Oman, and expectations of increased supply from Venezuela, market concerns over crude oil supply have clearly eased. The drop in oil prices further alleviates inflationary pressure and provides a more favorable macro environment for risk assets.
However, the crypto market still hasn’t truly caught up with this round of risk asset rally.
BTC is currently trading around $64,367, with the price continuously oscillating within the Max Pain range of $63K–$64K. The funding rate has slightly turned positive, short liquidations significantly exceed longs, and implied volatility remains at a low level. Although shorts are being squeezed, spot still trades at a discount, indicating institutional funds remain relatively cautious.
From a technical perspective, BTC shows strength in the short-term trend, but the daily chart has yet to confirm a true breakout. ETH’s overall performance remains weaker than BTC, with the daily structure still weak; SOL mostly follows the broader market and has not yet shown a clear independent trend.
The biggest feature of the current market is that US stocks continue to hit new highs, while the crypto market still "follows the decline but not the rise." The AI sector keeps attracting capital inflows, but digital assets remain trapped in a consolidation range, with neither bulls nor bears gaining overwhelming advantage.
My view remains unchanged:
Before a true volume breakout on the daily chart, the market will most likely continue to oscillate within a range.
Trading ideas:
• Consider scaling into BTC on pullbacks to $63,200–$63,500, with a stop loss at $62,600, targeting $64,900 and $65,800.
• If BTC rebounds to around $65,000–$65,800 but volume remains insufficient, consider light short positions, waiting for the price to return to the range.
• ETH remains weaker than BTC; BTC’s relative strength over ETH has not changed for now, so continue to watch for BTC/ETH relative strength opportunities.
The most important thing now is not frequent trading but maintaining patience. The Max Pain range tends to consume positions back and forth. Waiting for a true volume breakout to confirm direction and then following the trend is often more effective than betting early.
#BTC #ETH #Crypto
#DailyOrbit #临时通航协议待落地，油价风险尚未反转
The temporary navigation agreement is not the end point; the risk of oil price reversal is far from arriving.
Brothers, these past two days Trump has said, "The Strait of Hormuz agreement can be reached by Wednesday," causing oil prices to drop accordingly. Many think the geopolitical risk premium is about to clear, and shorts are celebrating wildly.
But my view is very clear: this temporary navigation agreement is precisely the starting gun for a new round of intense oil price volatility, not the end of the reversal. If you simply equate "agreement reached" with "oil price decline," you will likely pay a price later.
Why do I say this? Three underlying logics support my judgment:
First, history repeatedly proves there is a chasm between "reaching an agreement" and "actual navigation."
This is not the first time a navigation agreement has been rumored. In June, the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding, but what happened? The Strait of Hormuz was closed again to all ships that very day. This "negotiate-agree-rip up-renegotiate" script has played out several times, with core disputes—such as who controls the channel and whether Iran collects transit fees—remaining unresolved. Trump says "agreement tomorrow" while threatening "retaliation against anyone who charges fees," which is extreme pressure at the negotiation table. Signing the text does not mean ships can safely pass. Currently, navigation volume in the strait is far from normal levels; nearly 600 ships are still stuck in the Persian Gulf. Shipowners' confidence is rebuilt through guns and insurance clauses, not a mere statement.
Second, the market’s pricing of the "agreement" is too linear, completely ignoring the inventory gray rhino.
The market is pricing in a "supply recovery and price decline" scenario, but even if the strait truly reopens tomorrow, crude exports won’t instantly resume. Clearing mines, unblocking routes, shipowners assessing risks, and reestablishing insurance coverage will take weeks or longer to return to pre-conflict flow levels. More critically, the geopolitical conflict over the past six months has drained the global crude "buffer." OECD crude inventories have fallen to their lowest since 2003, with global daily inventory draws of 6.3 million barrels in Q2 and another 7.6 million barrels in Q3. Such extremely low inventories mean that even a slight delay in supply recovery or renewed negotiation uncertainties will cause oil prices not to "moderately decline" but to spring back sharply. Remember, Brent surged from $71 to over $100/barrel in July; the market is highly sensitive to supply disruptions, as history shows.
Third, the agreement’s implementation may ignite an even bigger hidden risk—the "capacity bomb" of OPEC+ still looms.
This is perhaps the most underestimated point. During the war, the world relied on inventory depletion to hold up supply, but a huge "scissor gap" has formed between OPEC+ production quotas and actual output. Once geopolitical barriers are truly removed, this accumulated potential supply release will impact oil prices in the medium to long term. But before that, short-term oil prices will be caught in a triangle of "geopolitical easing and decline," "negotiation setbacks and rebounds," and "low inventories and amplified elasticity." Many institutional scenarios confirm this: limited reconciliation corresponds to $65–80, full reconciliation to $60–70, but negotiation breakdown means $100–120. In this wide volatility range, blindly shorting carries huge risks.
In short, the current situation is: the market is prematurely celebrating a "ceasefire," but the underlying powder keg of geopolitical games remains intact. Control of the Strait of Hormuz lifeline concerns Iran’s core interests and the US midterm election political calculations. A temporary agreement can be signed, but the core contradictions remain unresolved; any disturbance will cause oil prices to spring back like a compressed spring.
Strategically, I choose not to chase shorts at this point. When Brent hovers around $78–80, pay close attention to the disconnect between extremely low inventories and actual strait recovery data. After the market fully prices in the "agreement implementation," if half a month later navigation volume remains sluggish or Iran issues harsh statements again—that will be a second chance to get in.
Remember, the end of geopolitical conflict is never linear, and oil price volatility never truly decreases because of a single agreement. In this market, surviving longer is more important than being right.Regarding the recently controversial $BEAT project, I bring you the latest updates today.
Based on on-chain data tracking, I discovered some anonymous wallets, and here is my analysis: Data shows that on June 9, a total of 20 new wallets were created in the same batch.
Over the past month, these wallets have withdrawn a total of 18.77 million tokens in batches from multiple channels including #gate, #mexc, and #pancakeswap.
The current total value is approximately 48.43 million USD. The most recent withdrawal occurred on July 31, when 900,000 tokens were withdrawn, indicating that the whale operations are still ongoing.
As for the small on-chain transaction activities, I just conducted an in-depth investigation: Since August 2, manual transactions have still appeared frequently, while a large number of bot trades are washing volume through arbitrage.
Starting August 3, small buy orders have appeared on major exchanges, and the small transaction data is also very healthy. Regarding futures positions, data shows a significant decline in open interest starting three days ago.
In summary, large holders have not sold off a large amount of spot tokens but are manipulating chips through the futures market to shake out positions.
This is perfectly reflected in the candlestick chart: from the high of 6.365 U on August 2, it fell back to around the overnight low of 2.348 U. It is still too early to say the market has stabilized; further trend observation is needed.
Summary: Based on all the information I have collected, the chip distribution of BEAT is currently in a healthy state; only the futures positions have temporarily shown unfavorable factors.
From all the above situations, if no signals are released within a week, it is very likely to enter a sideways downward strategy, requiring some time to restore $BEAT's momentum.
$BIO #标普500首次站上7700点，创历史新高 #财报观察员：业绩喜忧参半，解禁将至！SpaceX后续怎么看？ #SpaceX首份财报超预期，解禁仍是关键变量 $SNDK SanDisk: Whale "High Sell Low Buy," Pre-market Volatility Hides Secrets!
As of today 17:25, the SNDK perpetual contract is quoted at 1,413.11 USDT, with a 24-hour increase of only +0.26%, but the intraday high-low range reached 1,311.62 - 1,483.62, a volatility exceeding 170 points!
🐋 Whale Movements: The "Undisputed Winner" of Precise Harvesting
Market focus is on the Hyperliquid whale — this player, who has "won all 11 rounds" in Micron and SanDisk trades, is currently planning to "buy back SNDK at a low price." What does this mean?
1. Reduced positions at highs: The whale likely took profits above 1,480 (intraday high area).
2. Waiting to buy back: The current price has fallen about 5% from the high, and the whale is waiting for a deeper pullback to rebuild positions.
3. Reference value: As a player with "11 wins out of 11," their trading rhythm is a strong indicator for short-term traders.
📊 Technical Analysis of the Market
· Trend suppression: SuperTrend(14,3) is at 1,601.28, far above the current price, indicating that the daily level is still dominated by a bearish rebound pattern.
· Key zones: Strong resistance above at 1,483 (today's high) and 1,600 (trendline); support below first at the 1,400 round number, and if broken, a retest of the 1,311 low is possible.
· Cycle contrast: 7-day increase as high as +38.01%, but 30-day still down -22.19% — a typical "violent rebound after a crash" pattern, with extremely fierce bulls and bears battle.#闪迪财报前夕，HBF与存储紧缺引发热议
On the eve of SanDisk's earnings report, can the storage market continue?
Recently, SanDisk ($SNDK) has once again become the focus of market attention.
On one hand, with the earnings report approaching, capital is starting to play ahead; on the other hand, the storage demand growth driven by AI has refocused the market's attention on the storage industry chain.
The core logic behind this round of storage market activity is actually AI.
In the past, the market paid the most attention to computing power companies like Nvidia, but as AI data centers continue to expand, people have begun to realize that AI not only requires stronger computing power but also larger storage capacity and faster data transmission.
Whether it's HBM, high-end SSDs, or enterprise-level storage, demand is clearly increasing.
This is also why the storage sector has recently attracted capital attention.
However, there is currently a significant divergence in the market.
Those bullish believe that AI infrastructure construction is still ongoing, storage supply is difficult to increase quickly in the short term, and the industry's supply-demand relationship is expected to continue improving, benefiting companies like SanDisk and Micron.
But another portion of capital worries that storage stocks have risen significantly in the early stage, and the market has already priced in some of the future growth. If the earnings report does not bring higher expectations, the stock price may pull back.
Therefore, this SanDisk earnings report may not only be about how much money was made in the past.
More importantly, it is about how the company views demand in the coming quarters and whether the AI business can continue to drive growth.
My view: SanDisk is now trading not simply on the storage cycle but on whether storage demand will continue to rise in the AI era.
If management continues to release positive signals in the earnings report, such as order growth, strong demand, and price improvement, the market may re-recognize the growth logic of the storage industry.
But if future guidance falls short of expectations, even if the performance is good, there may be a "good earnings report but stock price decline" situation.
In the short term, the storage sector depends on capital sentiment; in the long term, it depends on whether AI infrastructure construction can truly translate into sustained growth in performance.
The market will ultimately not only reward stories; those that can truly turn demand into profit are the ones that will go far. Traditional finance has brought incremental funds to the crypto space, and Binance has played an indispensable role, with perpetual contract trading volume occupying a full 74%.
In simple terms, traditional financial assets are moving onto the Chain, and BNB Chain and Binance have respectively captured two key entry points: one responsible for hosting assets, the other for providing trading.
But the most noteworthy point here is not how much long-term capital has truly settled on-chain, but that the trading volume has far exceeded the scale of asset issuance. This indicates that the earliest explosion is still driven by leveraged trading and short-term demand.
Therefore, this set of data can prove the market is very active, but it cannot yet prove that tokenized ETFs have truly matured. What to watch next is whether more real assets enter the Chain, and whether the custody, redemption, and regulation of these products can withstand scrutiny. $LAB LAB｜Low volume at a low level waiting for the final decision! Current price 0.13, is it a golden ambush window or a bottom-fishing trap⚡
Current price 0.13
After a sharp round of decline, LAB has entered a long period of narrow range consolidation, with the price stuck around 0.13, fluctuating back and forth. The daily volatility has narrowed; there has been neither a volume surge with a strong bullish candle to break the dull pattern, nor a volume surge with a bearish candle to complete the final panic release. This day-after-day grinding movement is continuously wearing down the market’s trading patience. Investors trapped at high levels are caught in a dilemma: adding or averaging down risks expanding floating losses, and holding on comes at an increasing cost; cutting losses and exiting immediately risks missing a reversal rally right after selling. Traders on the sidelines, seeing the huge drop, feel tempted, believing the current price is safe enough to position low for rebound gains, yet worry that the support below might suddenly break, leaving them as the last holders.
In crypto market trading, many investors have a fatal misconception: a large drop means the bottom has arrived, and sideways movement means stabilization. But the real market is always full of disguises; oversold does not equal bottom, and low-level sideways can also be a downward continuation used to distribute chips in batches. The current 0.13 consolidation range is the core battleground of bulls and bears. Below, there is intermittent bottom-fishing capital support; above, there is continuous selling pressure from previously trapped holders. The surface looks calm, but chip battles are turbulent beneath. A significant one-sided move is entering its power accumulation countdown.
Looking at the entire crypto market, sector rotation continues steadily, with many previously oversold coins gradually recovering and rebounding, maintaining localized profit opportunities. In contrast, LAB shows an independent weak trend, completely unable to keep pace with the market’s warming rhythm. When the market rallies, LAB’s rebound is weak and short-lived, quickly pushed back by heavy selling pressure after a slight rise; the rebound lacks continuity. When the market pulls back slightly, LAB weakens first, testing support below, showing a clear pattern of following down but not up. Trading volume remains low, market heat continues to cool, no new major capital enters to build positions, and trading inside is just retail investors exchanging hands. Without sustained big money support, reversing the trend is very difficult.
Within the community, the divergence between bulls and bears intensifies, with two completely opposing trading logics directly determining LAB’s future trend.
The bears’ view is clear: the current box consolidation is just a brief pause in a downtrend; the overall downward structure is not repaired, and 0.13 is only a psychological support for retail investors. The main force precisely exploits retail investors’ habit of bottom-fishing oversold coins, using prolonged low-level sideways to create a false impression of stabilization, continuously attracting outside funds to take the chips. Once a large amount of low-level chips transfer to retail hands, a violent dump is unnecessary to trigger a stampede-like drop, opening a new downward space. Every small rebound is an opportunity to reduce positions and exit; blind bottom-fishing only leads to being trapped again.
The bulls’ logic also has a good risk-reward ratio. After multiple rounds of deep selling, the bears’ momentum is fully released, and the space for further large drops is compressed. The current repeated spike-and-drop consolidation is a classic bottom-shaking tactic by the main force, wearing down holders’ patience through prolonged grinding, washing out weak short-term floating chips, and forcing panic sellers to hand over chips at low levels. Once low-level chips are sufficiently concentrated, if market sentiment warms and funds return to the oversold sector, LAB’s long-accumulated rebound momentum will be fully unleashed, triggering a wave of retaliatory recovery. The current low range is the layout window for betting on a rebound.
From a technical perspective, the key price range 0.16–0.18 is the short-term core resistance zone, where a large amount of high-level trapped chips accumulate and where previous rebounds repeatedly faced pressure and fell back. Bulls must break through with volume and firmly hold above 0.18 to declare the short-term downtrend temporarily over and further push toward the 0.21–0.23 recovery target range. If the price cannot break this resistance, all upward moves can only be seen as short-term weak recoveries.
The 0.11–0.12 range is the short-term core support band and the strong/weak dividing line of the current box consolidation. Multiple probes have successfully attracted buying support. If a large bearish candle breaks this range effectively, the current consolidation will collapse, and the bearish trend will restart. 0.10 is the bulls’ last ultimate defense line; if this level is lost, the market will officially enter a prolonged deep downtrend.
On the hourly chart, multiple moving averages intertwine and stick together, various technical indicators continue to flatten and dull, and volume remains low for a long time, forming a standard consolidation convergence pattern. The box is full of traps, with frequent spikes up and down causing losses. Repeated trading within the range only wears down principal. A prudent trading approach is to give up frequent range trading and patiently wait for a clear breakout or breakdown signal before following the trend.
Key price levels
Core support: 0.11–0.12
Ultimate defense: 0.10
Short-term resistance: 0.16–0.18
Reversal confirmation: 0.19
Practical strategies
Short-term long attempt: If the price pulls back to 0.11–0.12 with shrinking volume and stabilizes without new lows, try a light long position with stop loss below 0.10; first take profit target at 0.16–0.18.
Breakout follow-up: If volume surges and price holds above 0.19 confirming trend strengthening, add positions on pullbacks without breaking support, aiming for upper recovery space.
Risk control: The overall market is weak; heavy leverage and large positions are strictly prohibited. All operations focus on short-term swings; refuse to stubbornly hold losing positions.
Breakdown handling: If price effectively breaks below 0.10, the bullish logic fails; exit decisively to avoid further downside risk.
Three major scenarios
Scenario 1✅ Washout ends, rebound starts: Low-level floating chips fully cleaned, incremental funds enter to push price up, volume breaks resistance zone, triggering an oversold rebound.
Scenario 2↔️ Continued range grinding: Bulls and bears stalemate, price oscillates within the box, waiting for broader market catalyst for final direction; no one-sided trend.
Scenario 3⚠️ Bull trap and breakdown: Using a small rebound to create a false stabilization, attracting many bottom-fishers, then concentrated selling pressure releases, breaking support and starting a new downtrend. #意大利大行减IBIT普通股94%，加仓质押ETH
Italy's largest bank has done something worth pondering.
Intesa Sanpaolo's 13F filing shows that in Q2, it cut its IBIT holdings by 93.7%, nearly liquidating, dropping from 646,809 shares to 40,723 shares. At the same time, it tripled its stake in BlackRock's staked ETH ETF, increasing from 116,200 shares to 349,600 shares.
Options were also adjusted simultaneously—Calls were cut from an equivalent of 2.49 million shares to 18,000 shares equivalent, and 500,000 shares equivalent of Puts were added.
This European banking giant's moves are not just simple buys or sells but a complete strategy shift.
What does this mean?
In the same quarter, it did three things: reduced BTC spot ETF holdings, cut Calls, and added Puts. It almost closed out its previous BTC long exposure and added an extra layer of protection. On the other hand, it tripled its staked ETH ETF holdings.
This is not a bet on ETH price increase but a bet on ETH staking yield. BlackRock's staked ETH ETF itself generates yield, and in the current environment where U.S. Treasury yields are above 5%, yield-bearing assets are more attractive than pure price exposure. Institutional funds naturally gravitate toward cash flow-generating assets.
The takeaway for ordinary traders is that institutional allocation logic is shifting from "hold and wait for price increase" to a balance of "yield generation + protection." BTC remains the core asset, but institutions have started using more tools to manage risk.
What do you think?
$BTC $SNDK $ETH SpaceX releases earnings report for the first time
Basically, everything exceeded expectations 😮
Estimate: Revenue $6.8 billion, EPS -0.26
Report: Revenue $7.8 billion, EPS -0.09
Although performance beat expectations
The stock price performance shows the market is still not convinced
The reason might be that capital expenditures also greatly exceeded expectations
The market originally expected about $13 billion
The actual report showed $18.3 billion
🚨 AI alone accounted for about $15.8 billion in a single quarter 🚨
The market may be worried about short-term cash flow and investment return timing
So how is SpaceX's current cash flow situation?
Cash $93.5 billion + securities $6.5 billion = $100 billion
Meaning even with Q2's high capital expenditures
Cash can support more than 5 quarters
This doesn't even include operating income and financing flexibility
Additionally, SpaceX CFO Bret Johnsen clearly stated
The payback period for AI investment is very likely less than 1 year
$SPCX Brothers, the market is full of 6 ups and 9 downs, BTC is sideways like dead water, betting on up or down is no different from flipping a coin — but the fattest money in this market is not in direction, it's in "relative price spreads."
First, set the tone: BTC 62,528, 24h -0.93%, volume down -31.3%, no one wants to move first, OI 111,400 BTC frozen solid. Breadth 6:9, a typical dead market skeleton.
But interesting data lies here: GRVT +14.55% and KAITO -16.1% have a full 30-point gap between them. This gap has nothing to do with whether BTC goes up or down; it’s "who’s strong and who’s weak" playing out on its own.
The dumbest thing during sideways periods is to fix your eyes on a single BTC candlestick to bet on direction. The real alpha source is relative strength — the strong get stronger, the weak get weaker, and you profit from the displacement between the two, not the market direction.
Here’s a framework for those who want to take it: the correct way to make money in a dead market is pairing (long strong / short weak), profiting from relative price spreads rather than betting on one-sided moves. Three filters for pairing — ① pick two targets in the same sector to avoid systemic risk; ② only act if the strength difference >15 points (GRVT/KAITO’s 30 points qualify); ③ hedge directional beta cleanly with inverse positions.
Self-analysis: I went long ADA (entry 0.1894, unrealized loss -1.37%) + short KAITO (entry 1.0033, unrealized loss -0.81%). At the time, the idea was a "pairing of old coins relatively weak," but I didn’t strictly follow the three filters, and the beta wasn’t hedged cleanly, so now both are underwater — a half-baked pair is just naked gambling, a negative example I’m showing you.
Friends, in a dead market, do you stubbornly hold one side or also play pairs? Share your most stable pair in the comments; if you guess wrong, I’ll take it as a reverse indicator.
Next time, we’ll talk about "how to pick targets with the same beta in pairs, so you’re not hedging for nothing."
Crypto assets are high risk; this article does not constitute investment advice and is purely personal opinion.
$BTC $GRVT $KAITO #PairTrading #MarketNeutral #TradingSystem #RelativeValue #RiskManagement #BeginnerGuide #MarketAnalysis #OKXPlanetBitcoin price continues to fluctuate in the 63,000–64,200 range, showing a narrow rise and then stabilizing within 24 hours, with selling pressure significantly easing compared to the previous period.
Market sentiment: Neutral / Defensive consolidation
Key signals: The outflow trend of spot ETF funds has temporarily slowed and turned into net inflow. Against the backdrop of relatively high US Treasury yields, whale accounts demonstrate strong holding resilience.
Analysis:
Catalysts and fundamentals: After the Federal Reserve maintained its interest rate decision and hawkish stance, macro risk appetite was suppressed in the short term.
However, the on-exchange chip structure shows that the concentrated sell-off wave has basically ended, and funds are in a wait-and-see period before the US non-farm payroll data release on Friday.
As US tech stocks (especially Palantir and Amazon) realize earnings and boost risk sentiment, BTC shows a clear follow-up defensive characteristic and still acts as a sensitive indicator of macro liquidity.
$BTC
#SpaceX首份财报超预期，解禁仍是关键变量 After AMD's earnings report, I am more focused on the next phase of the AI industry chain.
AMD's earnings data this time is actually very impressive.
Q2 revenue was $11.536 billion, a 50% year-over-year increase; data center business revenue was $6.7 billion, a 107% year-over-year increase. Just looking at these numbers already proves that AI demand remains strong.
But why didn't the market continue to rise and instead declined?
I think the core reason is not that AMD's growth has problems, but that the market is shifting from "looking at growth" to "looking at realization."
The biggest change in the AI industry over the past two years is that investors were willing to give very high expectations for the future in advance.
As long as a company is related to AI, the market would give a higher valuation.
But now it's different; capital is starting to focus on a more realistic question: after investing so much money to build AI infrastructure, can it ultimately be converted into profit?
For AMD, what really matters in the future is not how much single-quarter revenue grows, but whether it can continuously increase market share.
Especially in the AI chip field, NVIDIA has already established a very strong ecosystem advantage. For AMD to gain more recognition, it needs to prove that its product competitiveness and customer demand truly exist.
My view: this drop in AMD's stock price is more like a market adjustment to high expectations rather than a denial of the AI trend.
The AI industry is still developing, but the investment logic has changed.
Previously, the market bought into the "AI imagination space," now the market is starting to buy into the "actual profits brought by AI."
What is truly worth paying attention to in the future is not just chip companies' revenue growth, but who can establish long-term competitiveness in the AI wave and who can convert technological advantages into commercial value.
The hardest part for growth stocks is not to exceed expectations once, but to exceed the market's higher expectations every time. #AMD财报超预期，增长已被透支？ $AMD Circle's earnings report at 8 PM tonight: Don't just focus on EPS, the four key points are what really matter
Circle will release and explain its Q2 results at 8:00 PM Beijing time. Last quarter, USDC circulation reached $77 billion, a 28% year-over-year increase; on-chain transaction volume was $21.5 trillion, up 263%, but net profit actually fell 15% year-over-year. This is the biggest highlight tonight: with usage growth, can it translate into better shareholder returns?
I will focus on four items: USDC circulation, reserve yield, distribution costs, and non-interest income from the payment network and Arc. Looking only at EPS makes it easy to overlook Circle's sensitivity to interest rates; focusing only on USDC growth might miss costs and profit quality.
Do you think Circle is more like a high-growth crypto infrastructure or an interest rate-sensitive financial stock disguised in crypto clothing?
#CRCL #USDC #stablecoin #USstocks #CLARITYVoteMath
When the bronze doors of the Roman Senate were kicked open countless times by the heavy boots of factional strife, I knew that the laws carved into the stone pillars were never meant to protect the common people, but were conspiracies by the magistrates to redraw spheres of influence on the eve of civilization's collapse.
The "CLARITY Act," stranded on the eve of the Senate recess, is nothing more than a power struggle repeatedly played out in the corridors of history. The 60-vote threshold is like a towering retaining wall on the ancient city walls, firmly locking the ruling faction holding 53 seats outside the temple. The democratic faction raises the moral altar of "conflict of interest" and "anti-fraud." This drama was scripted two thousand years ago in Babylon—when the courtiers began debating whether the bill could "provide sufficient market barriers," they were essentially tearing apart the future ownership of tax power. This is no longer a question of whether to grant citizenship to barbarians, but who can carve their name on the murals of the new temple.
In the ancient regime relics I have studied, the elites' fear of conflicts of interest often stems from the fact that they themselves are the greatest tomb raiders. The clauses hidden in the bill's secret compartments are like oil lamps in the depths of ancient tombs that have not yet dried out. When Senate debates reach a deadlock, the atmosphere in the corridors of power is as eerie as a tomb raider's scene; even the slightest irregular stir of interests is a ghostly breath that extinguishes hope. The regulatory framework they hold is nothing more than a parchment scroll that can be erased and rewritten at any time according to the rise and fall of power.
The intense tremors in these legislative gaps directly project onto the dark veins of the asset market. The US stock token $XCRCL has shown an archaeologically valuable linked rise and fall amid this political deadlock. The pricing logic of $XCRCL is being pried tightly by this political lever: if the bill is completely sealed into a historical ice age before recess, the "compliance expectations" on which its premium depends will instantly weather like the clay tablets of a lost civilization; conversely, if these key votes can be privately negotiated and concluded at the last moment, the smelting process of the compliance narrative will directly rewrite the valuation foundation of the entire sector.
The alternation of bull and bear markets has always had a strict historical rhythm, and each time it rhymes the same way. Two thousand years ago, we bet on pharaoh power with bronze and gold; today, we gamble with code and laws on digital ledgers. While those officials sitting in Washington are still quibbling over a few votes, smart money has long begun to seek the first fragment of breakthrough in the $XCRCL fluctuations, signaling the official collapse or reconstruction of the imperial code.
The dust of the Senate has not yet settled, but history has already carved the verdict on the stele: bills lacking power compromise are nothing but forged antiques, and the market will ultimately crush them under the ashes of the old order.SpaceX’s Q2 revenue reached $7.81B, up 92% YoY, while its operating loss narrowed from $970M to $143M. The NVIDIA partnership for the Starmind AI1 satellite computing payload also strengthens the long-term technology case.
Still, the beat matters less near term than the supply and capital-intensity tests ahead. With up to 20% of restricted shares eligible for sale on Aug 6 and XSPCX down about 3.6% when checked, the market may need to absorb fresh supply before fundamentals regain control. The topic is currently ranked No. 2 trending on OKX Orbit.
This is market commentary, not financial advice.
#SpaceXBeatEstimates #OKXOrbitIn late July, spot BTC ETFs were still seeing net outflows, and on July 31 alone, they sold a large annual order of −265 million USD; But in August, the trend changed dramatically—August 3 +170 million, August 4 +211.5 million, two consecutive days of net inflows, totaling about $382 million. This round of institutional "foot voting" happens to be stepping on macro tailwinds such as Hormuz easing, oil price plunge, and the S&P below 70 trillion yuan, serving as the cleanest on-chain confirmation of a recovery in risk appetite. 📈 Three sets of numbers to understand the rhythm · Daily flow (Decrypt / Myriad data): 7/22 +69 million → 7/23 −225 million → 7/24 −240 million (net outflow over two days −465 million) → 7/27 −12 million → 7/28 −50 million → 7/29 +32 million (positive turnover)→ 7/30 +233 million (large-scale return)→ 7/31 −265 million (large single-day withdrawal) → 8/3 +170 million → 8/4 +2.115 billion (two consecutive days of inflows). · Two-day total: Net inflow from 8/3 to 8/4 was about $382 million, the cleanest consecutive wave of inflows since the net outflow in late July. Signal meaning: Myriad traders give about a 50% probability of maintaining positive inflow on 8/5—even the market itself cannot guarantee that the return flow will persistWhen the number hits 60.25 million, your staking rewards drop to zero
On August 4th, six researchers jointly submitted a proposal, including EthCC founder Jérôme de Tychey and Ethereum Foundation's Justin Drake. The original number was EIP-8361, but it was changed to EIP-8363 due to a conflict. In less than two days, the Ethereum community erupted in debate.
The proposal aims to install a downhill slope for staking rewards. The more ETH staked across the network, the higher the proportion of consensus layer issuance rewards that get burned. When the staked amount reaches 60.25 million, which is half of the total ETH supply, the newly issued rewards for validators performing normally will be completely offset by burns, making net rewards approach zero.
Let's do some math. The current staking rate is about 33%, with an annualized consensus layer yield of approximately 2.6%. If this curve is implemented as is, the yield would drop to around 1.2%, cutting more than half.
It's not a one-size-fits-all cut. The proposal sets an 18-month transition period, temporarily raising the base reward factor from 64 to 128, then gradually lowering it back to 64 over 65 steps, each about 8.6 days. However, the line that stops issuance incentives at 50% staking activates from day one, not waiting for the 18 months.
One point is easy to misread. The zeroing only applies to the newly issued consensus layer rewards; execution layer incomes like priority fees and MEV are unaffected. Validators won't earn nothing, but the passive new coin rewards vanish.
Why such a move? The proposers argue that current rules always encourage more staking with no stop button, causing funds to concentrate with a few large custodians, exchanges, and staking derivatives. Meanwhile, non-stakers keep getting diluted by new issuance. De Tychey calculated that at the current entry speed, staking could exceed 70 million by early 2028, over 55% of supply, making any reversal then even more disruptive.
Opposition voices have grown louder these past days. Aave founder Stani Kulechov said yields near zero would destroy the cash flow predictability institutions value most and crush ETH lending and LST re-staking positive carry strategies. Obol co-founder Oisín Kyne argued that too low yields and high capital costs would force independent operators out first, leaving only large institutions indifferent to yields, worsening centralization. Ether.fi CEO Mike Silagadze criticized the rushed timing, saying the ecosystem lacks enough time to discuss.
The first to get hit hardest are solo home validators. Fixed costs like hardware, electricity, and maintenance won't decrease, but net rewards are halved. The proposal estimates that at the current ~33% staking rate, downtime losses will take about 3.8 times longer to recover from due to reduced rewards.
The impact then cascades to DeFi. LSTs are essentially interest-bearing certificates you get by handing over ETH, like stETH. When underlying yields drop, the yield gap between LSTs and native ETH narrows, raising the question of whether it's worth bearing contract, governance, and de-pegging risks for a point or two. One layer up, the positive carry loop of borrowing ETH to buy LSTs and re-mortgaging to borrow more ETH disappears, forcing leverage positions to shrink. Products built around LST yields like Aave, Morpho, and Pendle will all need to be repriced.
This is still just an unmerged draft. The authors also submitted PR #12087 to include it in the Hegotá upgrade discussion list, but it hasn't merged. Core developers plan to discuss its priority at the 184th ACDC meeting on August 6th.
The market reference is concrete. ETH staking recently hit a record high of 41.4 million, 34% of supply, still quite far from the 60.25 million threshold, so short-term this affects sentiment more than cash flow. But with the developer meeting tomorrow, the news could cause waves, and LST-related assets and lending protocol tokens closely tied to staking rewards will likely be more volatile than ETH itself, so traders should be prepared.
Looking further, this debate actually touches on a more fundamental question: Should ETH be an interest-bearing internet bond, or a neutral currency that doesn't need to yield but just avoid dilution? ARK's research lead Lorenzo Valente frames it this way—your stance changes the entire valuation logic.
So here's a question for you: Is your ETH meant for staking to earn that yield, or do you just want to hold quietly without dilution? In the past two days, many on-chain analysts have observed a decline in LTH-RP. Simply put, the traditional crossover path between STH-RP and LTH-RP may change in this cycle and might not replicate historical patterns.
Therefore, based on the pinned post, I do not observe the STH/LTH crossover but instead monitor the convergence process of the STH/LTH Ratio.
Historical observations:
When the Ratio approaches around 1.2, it usually indicates the late stage of a bear market;
When the Ratio ≤1, it often corresponds to the confirmation phase of bear market exit.
Latest data:
• First time Ratio ≤1.4: 2026-07-08
• Latest data date: 2026-08-04
• Days passed: 27 calendar days
• Current Ratio: 1.375319
• Ratio has not yet reached 1.2
At present, the current cycle is still within the historical convergence path range.
Further updates will continue to observe whether the current STH/LTH Cost Ratio continues to converge according to the historical late bear market path.#Trump Token Faces Senate Investigation Request｜A Real Review, Discussing the News, Market, and My Own Views
This morning I just came across this major news: Senators Warren and Blumenthal, both Democrats, officially wrote to the SEC demanding a thorough investigation into the $TRUMP meme coin. This issue doesn't just affect this one coin; it has stirred up the entire meme sector and the US crypto regulatory bills. Let me break down the whole story in plain terms.
1. The Core Background of the Whole Matter
1. The Trigger for This Investigation
The senators hold complete data: at launch, TRUMP coin's market cap peaked at $9 billion, now it's less than $400 million. Retail investors who bought at the peak have lost an average of 95%, with nearly one million ordinary investors collectively losing $3.8 billion; meanwhile, Trump-related entities hold 80% of the token supply, and he personally cashed out $636 million from this coin alone.
The two senators directly labeled this token as a typical pump-and-dump scam, leveraging the president's identity to hype and harvest ordinary retail investors, demanding the SEC investigate whether there is illegal pyramid selling, insider manipulation, or unfair profiteering.
2. The Chain Reaction with Regulatory Bills
The industry had long awaited the "Clarity Act" on digital assets, which is stuck in Senate voting. This incident has completely stalled the bill negotiations. The two parties are at odds: Democrats insist on banning public officials from crypto investments, Republicans refuse to compromise, and the short-term expectation for a compliant framework in the US crypto industry has cooled off.
3. The SEC's Current Dilemma
The SEC chair is a crypto-friendly appointee personally chosen by Trump. On one hand, they must respond to Congress's investigation demands; on the other, they previously stated that ordinary meme coins are not securities and thus lack enforcement grounds. It's a catch-22, and whether they investigate or not, it will bring huge uncertainty to the market.
2. Actual Impact on the Market and Various Sectors
1. TRUMP Token Itself: Under Full Short-Term Pressure, Concentrated Sell-Off
Within 24 hours of the news, the token plummeted as funds fled wildly. This coin has no real-world application and relies solely on Trump's personal popularity to support its price. Now that the regulatory investigation label is attached, all funds previously betting on positive news are rushing to exit.
Key risk: If the SEC officially files a case, major exchanges may delist the token, leaving retail investors with no channel to stop losses or exit, causing the price to potentially drop to zero. The risk is several times higher than ordinary meme coins.
2. The Entire Meme Sector Weakens, Funds Flee to Safety
Dogecoin and various political meme coins are all under pressure. Funds now fear being tagged as "political figure tokens," worried about subsequent regulatory crackdowns. Today’s market clearly shows funds withdrawing from Dogecoin and hot meme coins, flowing back into BTC, ETH, and other mainstream safe havens.
Previously, meme trading was a bet on sentiment and hype; now, with regulators directly targeting hype tactics, the sector is unlikely to see major rallies in the short term, with low volume and gradual declines becoming the norm.
3. Macro Crypto Market: Weakened Regulatory Expectations Suppress Upside
Recently, the market was united in betting on looser US crypto regulations in the second half of the year, with funds entering early to position. This investigation has shattered half of those expectations.
Simply put: even if the SEC ultimately treats the case lightly, Congress will keep a close watch on the crypto market for a while, frequently issuing inquiries and investigations. As long as regulatory uncertainty persists, Bitcoin and Ethereum are unlikely to produce sustained strong rallies, probably maintaining wide high-level oscillations.
3. My Own Straightforward Market Views, No Nonsense
1. Absolutely Avoid Political Meme Coins Like TRUMP
These coins have highly concentrated token holdings, with core operators closely related to the figure behind them. Once regulatory pressure hits, with no fundamental support to backstop, the downside is limitless. Ordinary retail investors cannot outrun institutional cash-outs, essentially just handing over money.
2. Abandon Short-Term Trading in the Meme Sector
Risk aversion is at a peak now. Even if there are occasional small rebounds, they are just short-term traps with existing funds. Entering now risks getting stuck halfway up the mountain. Rather than wasting fees on back-and-forth trades, it’s better to move funds to mainstream coins and observe.
3. Focus on Two Things Mid-to-Long Term to Decide Market Direction
First, whether the SEC will officially launch a formal investigation into the TRUMP coin; second, whether the Senate’s Clarity Act can reach a compromise and be implemented. If either event turns negative, the market will likely retrace to find support; if the investigation fizzles out and the bill progresses smoothly, a new rally will follow.
A Few Casual Thoughts
There is a big split in the community today. Some believe that once this negative news is fully priced in, it’s a bottom-fishing opportunity to bet on a rebound; many veteran players think the regulatory storm is just beginning, the meme sector will continue to decline, and plan to completely clear out all meme holdings.
Do you still hold political meme coins? Are you planning to exit on rebounds or wait for further regulatory developments to play the market?$BTC
Awesome! It really has surpassed 1,000,000.
Now, the single price of $63,000 has accumulated to 1,150,000 BTC, which is an extremely rare phenomenon in history.
Although the recent coldcard hardware wallet vulnerability has forced some long-term holders to transfer BTC.
But it is definitely not the main reason for the explosive turnover of chips around 63k.
Instead, it is the result of BTC price maintaining low volatility over a long period of accumulation.
At the same time, the nearby chip concentration has risen to 13.5%.
Chips cannot accumulate indefinitely; the long and short game has reached a critical point where there must be a winner.
I am increasingly looking forward to what will happen next..... #S&P 500 Surpasses 7700 for the First Time, Hits All-Time High
🔥 The S&P 500 has crossed 7700, but the "big short" is already positioned
Brothers, the US stock market has made history again.
At the close on August 4, the S&P 500 rose 136 points, up 1.79%, closing at 7736 points, surpassing the 7700 mark for the first time ever. The Dow was even more impressive, surging 907 points in a single day to break through 54,000 points, also an all-time high.
If you only look at this closing price, it feels like the bull market is unstoppable. But the pre-market and intraday sessions were quite tense—chip stocks experienced wild swings early on, with Micron dropping 6% then rallying to nearly 2% gains, only stabilizing near the close. This shows the market isn’t blindly rising; it’s a fierce battle between bulls and bears, with bulls barely taking the upper hand.
---
【The Three Engines Driving This Rally】
First, AI is finally delivering results.
Palantir surged 29.5% after hours last night, marking its biggest single-day gain since February 2024, thanks to Q2 revenue growth of 93% and a significant upward revision of its full-year guidance. Caterpillar also rose 5.6%, driven by the AI data center construction boom boosting demand for power generation equipment and construction machinery.
The market had been worried that AI was "just spending money without returns," but these earnings reports have temporarily dispelled that concern.
Second, the Middle East situation suddenly cooled down.
Trump decided over the weekend to delay a new round of strikes on Iran, causing Brent crude oil to plunge 4.7% in one day to $83. When oil prices fall, inflation expectations immediately ease; US Treasury yields dropped from 4.75% to 4.68%, and the probability of a Fed rate hike in September fell from 67% to 57%.
Third, the ISM manufacturing index hit a four-year high.
The July ISM manufacturing PMI reached 55.6%, with production, employment, and new orders all expanding, corresponding to an annualized GDP growth rate of about 2.8%. Strong economy plus easing inflation is the market’s favorite "soft landing" scenario.
---
【But Some Are Already Betting on a Top】
On the very day the S&P 500 hit a new high, "big short" Michael Burry was reported to have bet that the market has peaked, warning of a potential 1987-style crash.
He’s not the only cautious one. Jack Ablin, Chief Strategist at Cresset Capital, said bluntly: "I’m not sure a few earnings reports are enough to support the S&P 500 reaching a new all-time high."
There’s also a sobering data point: the ratio of the S&P 500 to Bitcoin just broke above its 14-year long-term average, suggesting that the stock market’s strength relative to BTC may have reached an extreme level, increasing the risk of a trend reversal.
---
【What This Means for Crypto】
While US stocks hit new highs, BTC is still hovering around 76,000, nearly 40% below its previous peak.
This divergence actually indicates two things:
First, the crypto narrative this year is indeed weaker than that of US stocks. The AI productivity revolution directly benefits US tech stocks, but crypto lacks a new grand narrative beyond ETF fund flows and Trump policy expectations.
Second, if the US stock market really experiences the "1987-style correction" Burry predicts, crypto is unlikely to remain unscathed. Historically, during sharp US stock declines, BTC’s safe-haven attribute basically disappears; it falls along with the market, often with even greater losses.
---
【My View】
In the short term, the S&P 500 breaking 7700 is a peak in sentiment, not a buying opportunity. Palantir and Caterpillar’s earnings are indeed impressive, but the market has already priced in most expectations. The real focus will be Friday’s nonfarm payroll data—if it beats expectations strongly, the Fed’s rate cut expectations will be further delayed, and the current "soft landing" euphoria could quickly reverse.
In the medium to long term, 7700 itself has no magical significance; it’s just a psychological barrier. What truly determines direction is whether AI investments can continue to deliver results and whether the Fed will raise rates.
Strategically, this level is not recommended for chasing US stocks. Those with positions can hold; those without should wait for a pullback. Crypto brothers need to be even more cautious—if US stocks pull back, BTC will likely follow and fall even harder.
This is purely my personal opinion and not investment advice. Do you think the S&P 500 can reach 8000 this time? Let’s discuss in the comments.$SPCX
SpaceX shares will experience a peak unlocking period from August to November, with the circulating share capital increasing from 640 million to 5.2 billion, mainly due to employee stock holdings, which is equivalent to a large amount of retail selling pressure. Regardless of future prospects, it will be difficult for the stock to surge significantly in the next six months.
From January to June next year, institutional investors will unlock shares, but the volume is small and can be ignored. In June 2027, Elon Musk's 52% stake will also unlock, but as the founder has no strong motivation to sell immediately, this can be disregarded for now.$SPCX
The first thing I did this morning was check the $SPCX price. In one sentence: continue to add to short positions with 20x leverage!
First, the stock price surged to 130 due to Elon Musk's call and shorts making too much money, causing a short squeeze, just as everyone hoped.
But after the earnings report came out, it fell back to around 120 or even lower!
In short, the earnings report looks good, but they also spent a lot of money. What does the positive news release mean? Everyone, answer me.
I won’t talk about 130 anymore; if it can’t hold above 120, then basically there’s no hope for it to go higher.
Secondly, there are still 910 million shares waiting to be unlocked, which is even larger than the circulating supply in the market. Can the stock price stay stable?
Right now, the situation is that it was pulled from the bottom at 104 up to 130. To put it bluntly, it was to let some people sell off. Now that everyone has sold, who’s left to play along with the story?
Also, from past market trends and everyone’s sentiment, many optimistic friends are basically trapped inside. Those who keep bottom-fishing later can’t keep buying endlessly. These people won’t take the risk to buy anymore, plus the unlocking. Doesn’t that mean a clear short signal?
So I’m more inclined to think that after the unlock tomorrow, it will continue to fall, first breaking 100, then continuing downward.
This is my current judgment, and I’m not being a Monday morning quarterback. After all, I started openly shorting when it broke below 110. This rebound was also expected, and the higher position is even more favorable for me to open short positions.
Let’s wait and see… The S&P 500 surpassed 7700 points for the first time, but BTC did not simultaneously break through, showing a clear temperature difference between the two types of risk assets.
In the previous trading day, the US stock market hit new highs across the board: the S&P 500 rose 1.79%, closing at 7736.52 points; the Nasdaq rose 2.59%, closing at 26584.99 points; the Dow Jones rose 1.71%, closing at 54085.88 points.
This rally was not driven solely by a few heavyweight stocks.
The ratio of advancing to declining stocks on the NYSE reached 2.84 to 1, and on the Nasdaq it was 2.89 to 1. Total market volume was about 18.89 billion shares, approximately 9% higher than the 20-day average of 17.33 billion shares. Among the S&P 500 constituents, 304 companies have reported Q2 earnings, with 85.2% beating market expectations, significantly above the long-term average of 67.5%.
Technology remains the strongest theme. The S&P technology sector rose 4.1% in a single day, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 6.6%. The latter had fallen cumulatively by 20.6% in July, and this rally looks more like a concentrated recovery after earnings validation.
The drop in oil prices also created room for risk assets. Brent crude fell below $80 per barrel, easing market concerns about inflation and further rate hikes. The US stock market simultaneously received support from "earnings beating expectations" and "easing rate pressure."
BTC's reaction was much more restrained.
As of 17:10 Beijing time, BTC was around $64,092, up about 0.96% intraday, trading in a range of $63,403 to $64,446, with a volatility of about 1.64%. When the US stock market hit record highs, BTC still did not break through the recent upper range.
Capital is not completely absent. On August 4, the US spot BTC ETF saw a net inflow of $211.5 million, with IBIT inflows of $170.3 million, accounting for about 80.5% of the total inflow that day. At the current coin price, $211.5 million is equivalent to about 3,300 BTC, roughly 7 times the daily new supply of Bitcoin.
The futures market also did not show obvious overheating. CoinGlass snapshots show the average funding rate across the BTC market is about 0.0019%, Binance about 0.0014%, OKX about 0.0061%, and Bybit about 0.0100%. Long positions need to pay fees, but overall crowding remains limited.
This data indicates that risk appetite has indeed returned, but funds are currently more concentrated in US stocks with earnings support and BTC spot ETFs, without a broad expansion in the crypto market.
US stocks hitting new highs can improve market sentiment but cannot help BTC complete a breakthrough. If ETFs continue to see daily inflows of hundreds of millions of dollars while BTC remains near $64,000, it means stronger selling pressure is absorbing these new demands simultaneously.
#标普500首次站上7700点，创历史新高 $SPCX
Everyone on Twitter is dissecting SpaceX's financial report,
revenue figures, Starlink user count, and losses.
But maybe? SpaceX is no longer just a rocket company.
It is an infrastructure company using Starlink's cash flow to fund AI.
From February to March, there was a 100% exodus, unprecedented in the tech industry. Over 50 researchers moved to Meta. In May, Musk directly announced that xAI would no longer be independent and merged into SpaceXAI.
Then this AI division, which lost its core team, delivered a quarterly report last night showing 2.56 billion in revenue and 15.8 billion in capital expenditure. Revenue 2.56 billion, spending 15.8 billion. Spending is six times the earnings.
For the whole SpaceX Q2, revenue was 7.8 billion, beating expectations by nearly 1 billion, growing 92%. Breaking down the three segments:
-- Starlink: 4.3 billion, profit of 1.66 billion
-- AI: 2.56 billion, loss of 1.26 billion
-- Rockets: 960 million, loss of 540 million
In short, Starlink is funding AI.
The market also understands this. Despite beating revenue by nearly 1 billion, after-hours trading dropped over 8%. The drop wasn’t due to revenue but the 18.4 billion capital expenditure. 18.4 billion in one quarter, 86% spent on AI. Annualized 63 billion. This company’s full-year revenue is just over 30 billion.
The CFO said the AI computing power payback period is less than a year. Whether the market believes it or not, the after-hours price has already given an answer.
So where is this money going? Expanding the Colossus II supercomputer cluster, signing a 14.1 billion cloud computing contract with Anthropic and Google, and a 60 billion all-stock acquisition of Cursor.
This chain is directly related to the supply chain we have been tracking. SpaceX’s AI capital expenditure ultimately buys GPUs, storage, and optical modules. Another super buyer with an annualized 63 billion.
The person taking over AI is Nicholls, who previously managed Starlink operations. His inaugural memo had one sentence: catch up to Claude. Several internal projects are directly named after Claude.
And Musk? Reportedly, he’s recently obsessed with playing Elden Ring, having employees help him fight bosses, pushing meetings from 8 PM to 2 AM. Meanwhile, he’s still managing rockets, satellites, a car company with profits down 57%, and a social platform.
Then there’s tomorrow.
On August 6, SpaceX’s first batch of shares will be unlocked. Up to 911.5 million shares, valued at over 100 billion at the after-hours price of 117 dollars. The current fully diluted market cap is about 86 billion. The incoming sellable shares exceed the current float.
Of course, the price fell 48% from 225 to 117 in 51 days, short interest exceeds 30%, so the possibility of bad news being fully priced in also exists.
But regardless of tomorrow’s rise or fall, one thing is clear. SpaceX is no longer a rocket company. It is an infrastructure company using Starlink’s cash flow to fund AI.
Of course, you can also say more diplomatically that it has evolved from a traditional rocket and satellite company into a comprehensive infrastructure platform supported by Starlink’s cash flow for large-scale AI infrastructure investment, with rocket capabilities still serving as a differentiated moat.Recently, SK Hynix has once again become the focus of market attention.
SK Hynix and NVIDIA have announced a further deepening of their long-term cooperation, which is no longer limited to HBM supply but includes joint research and optimization of the next generation of AI memory. Meanwhile, the AI infrastructure cooperation promoted by SK Group and NVIDIA has exceeded $500 billion, and Microsoft is also strengthening its long-term supply cooperation of AI server memory with SK Hynix.
This sends an increasingly clear signal:
The competition in AI is no longer just a battle between models, but also a competition for high-end memory and computing resources.
In the past, when AI was mentioned, the market first thought of NVIDIA; but now it is increasingly clear that no matter how powerful the GPU is, without the support of HBM, it cannot fully perform. SK Hynix’s ability to bind both NVIDIA and Microsoft relies not on concepts but on controlling one of the scarcest core resources in the AI era.
However, in my view, this news does not have such a direct impact on the crypto market.
It may further boost market sentiment in the AI sector and possibly drive short-term speculation in some AI concept coins. But Microsoft, NVIDIA, and SK Hynix are receiving real orders, revenue, and cash flow, whereas many AI concept coins may only gain brief attention driven by market sentiment.
My judgment is simple:
The positive news for SK Hynix is a genuine fundamental benefit, but the logic behind the rise of AI concept coins may not be the same.
In the next market cycle, the market may no longer pay for all projects labeled "AI" but will be more willing to reward those that truly have users, revenue, and actual computing power demand.
What do you think? Will this AI hardware boom ultimately drive AI concept coins higher, or will funds still concentrate in U.S. tech stocks and the semiconductor sector?
$SKHY #AppleTopsNvidia $NVDA
#DailyOrbit SpaceX's financial report itself doesn't really have much to dissect; the narrative is still the key.
Commercial spaceflight is essentially infrastructure and isn't worth that much money; launching rockets is mainly to send Starlink satellites into orbit. Reusable technology has little short-term value for moon landings or Mars missions because these tasks are still just big dreams.
Even if these missions happen in the future, compared to the difficulty of interstellar expeditions and the value of the personnel, supplies, and spacecraft involved, the money saved by reusability might not be as cost-effective as developing a reliable, heavy-lift expendable rocket.
At this stage, the greatest value of rocket reusability remains reducing the overall cost of low Earth orbit satellites, which is meaningful for Starlink and the upcoming space computing power.
However, in practical commercial terms, space computing power is almost a false proposition. Although Musk said on the call that they will go all in with NVIDIA and launch the Vera Rubin NVL72 rack-mounted system Starmind satellite next year, such satellites are destined to be very heavy, expensive, large, and costly.
Moreover, space cooling can only rely on blackbody radiation, which is extremely inefficient, and once damaged, repair costs are very high. It is estimated that in the end, it will just be a test satellite that fails, with no effective capacity within ten years. Essentially, it is a valuation narrative asset rather than an operating asset.
For SPCX bulls, the narrative still depends on how big a story Musk can tell and whether the market will follow the bubble. From the current situation, the market is not buying it.
So if Musk can hold the narrative with words to prevent the stock price from falling too much while waiting for fundamental growth, the future can only rely on Starlink and computing power leasing to continue growing and driving cash flow.
After all, xAi is also underperforming and is destined not to compete with Anthropic and OpenAI within the foreseeable future, which makes the market very concerned about capital expenditures in the AI direction. This is also why the market complains that SpaceX has become a company similar to Meta and Oracle, doing computing power leasing, which reduces the grand narrative of reaching the stars and the sea.
In summary, SpaceX is now a project that uses Starlink to fund Starship and Grok. The real blow to the company will come when Starlink's revenue growth slows down.
PS: I partly agree with Morgan Stanley's breakdown of SpaceX's stock price, but the exact value of each part is still debatable.
$SPCX #SpaceX首份财报超预期，解禁仍是关键变量 Is there hope for Dogecoin's market cap to surpass $SOL?
Honestly, it's quite difficult in the short term, but not entirely impossible.
Currently, $SOL's market cap is about $43 billion, while $DOGE is only around $10.8 billion, nearly a 4x difference. This gap can't be closed with just one or two limit-up days.
What would DOGE need to overtake? Mainly "sentiment" and "Elon Musk." Dogecoin is essentially a meme coin without hardcore technical ecosystems; its advantage lies in a passionate community and strong topicality. If Elon Musk suddenly goes on another wild promotion spree, or if the crypto market experiences another round of widespread FOMO bull run, DOGE—being a low-priced coin loved by retail investors—could indeed surge several times. Back in 2021, its market cap once surged to $90 billion, so it has had its "glory" period.
But SOL is no pushover either. Solana has a solid DeFi and NFT ecosystem, with on-chain activity and developer numbers far surpassing DOGE. Institutional funds also prefer SOL as a "tech-focused" asset. Unless SOL suffers a major security breach or the entire ecosystem collapses, its market cap base is much more stable than DOGE's.
In short: DOGE surpassing SOL is like a "viral meme" beating a "serious tech company." In the magical world of crypto, it's not impossible, but the odds are low. If you want to bet, you have to bet on an epic meme craze; if you want stability, these two are simply not in the same league.
To sum up in one sentence: There's hope, but don't get your expectations too high. #AMD earnings exceed expectations, is growth already priced in?
AMD's Q2 earnings core numbers are indeed strong, but the roughly 8-9% drop after hours is mainly due to "expectation gaps" and a "reckoning mode" prevailing, rather than poor performance itself. Your observation is basically accurate.
Key figures check (Q2 2026, released after market close on August 4)
• Revenue about $11.54 billion, up 50% year-over-year, a record high, significantly exceeding Wall Street consensus (around $11.28 billion).
• Non-GAAP EPS $1.66, beating expectations.
• Data center revenue about $6.7 billion, up 107% year-over-year (more than doubled), accounting for about 58% of total revenue, the biggest growth driver (powered by EPYC CPUs + Instinct GPUs).
• Q3 revenue guidance about $13 billion (±$300 million), midpoint up about 41% year-over-year and about 13% quarter-over-quarter, also exceeding mainstream consensus (around $12.5 billion), though some of the most aggressive analysts expected even higher (mentioning $13.5-14 billion or more).
Strong data center, overall profitability improvement, Helios rack systems starting shipments to customers (including mentioned directions) with expected volume ramp in Q4, Su Zifeng's long-term story of data center doubling again in 2027 are all real positives.
Why did it still fall?
1. Expectations already fully priced in by the stock: AMD has surged greatly this year (reported nearly doubled or even close to tripled), the market had long priced in strong AI/data center growth. In such a high-expectation environment, even a beat, if "not explosive enough" (guidance not far exceeding the most optimistic estimates), easily triggers profit-taking and disappointment selling. This is a typical "good news sells the fact" scenario.
2. Capital expenditures significantly increased: Q2 CapEx about $808 million, sharply up year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter (jumping from about $280 million last year same period and about $390 million last quarter). The market is sensitive to AI-related spending, worried about sustained high CapEx and uncertain return rhythm—similar logic to some big companies previously punished for CapEx. Although this money is invested in growth, short-term free cash flow perception is affected.
3. Other noise: Gaming business declined significantly year-over-year (weak semi-custom demand), some investors are still waiting for more aggressive Helios volume details or clearer market share capture signals. The intraday rise and after-hours pullback also reflect sentiment quickly switching from "optimistic trading" to "strict reckoning."
Outlook
The earnings and guidance themselves are not bad; data center acceleration and product mix (EPYC + Instinct + Helios) still hold strong positions in the AI wave. The long-term logic (AI computing demand expansion, AMD as one of Nvidia's main alternatives) remains intact. But short-term stock price is highly sensitive to "expectation gaps" and CapEx discipline, so volatility will be large.
This pattern is common for unlocked or high-level earnings reactions: numbers look good, but the market wants "super-expectation beats." Paying attention to actual shipment pace, next quarter execution, and whether subsequent CapEx is controllable is more meaningful than single-day price moves. At high valuations, any slight deviation in guidance or spending can be magnified.
Your judgment that "growth is already priced in? The market has entered reckoning mode" makes sense. The strong performance is a fact, but pricing is already full, so short-term pressure is not surprising.The police officer who caught the thief ended up robbing coins himself and was sentenced to life imprisonment.
The person robbing your coins might be wearing a uniform.
According to The Block, former Los Angeles Police Department officer Eric Halem was sentenced to life imprisonment plus an additional 15 years for participating in a robbery involving crypto assets. Few details of the case have been made public, but one thing is certain: the sentence is extremely severe.
This kind of incident has a specific term in the community: wrench attack. The meaning is straightforward—no matter how long your private key is, how complex your passphrase is, or which drawer your cold wallet is in, if someone stands in front of you, none of that matters. On-chain security solves code problems but cannot solve physical problems. Over the past two years, such cases have appeared in multiple countries, with the common factor being that victims often flaunted their wealth on social platforms.
Almost simultaneously, another thread is unfolding. CertiK detected that two transactions of 200 ETH each related to the Coldcard attack were sent into Tornado Cash. The path was first through THORChain, swapping BTC cross-chain into ETH, landing in an address starting with 0x41B7, then gradually transferred into the mixer.
A mixer, simply put, pools a large amount of people’s funds together, stirs them up, and then lets them out from the other end, effectively breaking the on-chain tracking trail. The attacker’s address had previously received a 10% laundering fee offer; now it seems the negotiation phase is over, and they acted on their own.
The third thread is in Europe. On July 31, ESMA updated the MiCA registration list, adding 12 new entities, bringing the total number of licensed crypto asset service providers to 321. The most eye-catching on the list are not exchanges but three German cooperative banks, as well as French companies like Finary and Woorton, which focus on payments and market making. In the same update, Cervo Rendisco, Flandenzo, and Corona Fondenza were added to the non-compliance list, which now totals 167 entries, marked by Italian regulators. The number of electronic money token issuers remains at 41, and there are no asset-referenced token issuers.
Looking at these three events on the same day, the picture is quite clear. Some are robbing coins in the most primitive way, some are laundering coins using the most technical methods, and others are issuing licenses to the industry in the slowest way. The speeds of these three threads are completely different, but they all push in the same direction: binding coin ownership and identity more tightly.
For us coin holders, the impact is not on today’s K-line but on how we hold coins. On July 31, the day of the Coldcard incident, active on-chain addresses surged from 645,000 to nearly 1 million, and small transfer volumes approached the levels seen during the FTX collapse—meaning hundreds of thousands of people moved their assets in one day. This moving process won’t end that day; it will continue to affect exchange spot depth and selling pressure rhythm over the following weeks.
Security incidents usually affect the market in two phases. The first phase is short-term selling pressure caused by panic moving, which has already passed. The second phase is where the moved funds end up—whether they return to cold wallets to lie dormant or stay on exchanges ready to sell. We are currently in the observation period of this second phase. Recently, the proportion of whales sending coins to exchanges hit a four-month high, which is somewhat related.
In the short term, these news are bearish. Looking longer term, the ratio of 321 licensed institutions to 167 non-compliance entries shows that the industry is being forcibly put into a framework. The framework may be uncomfortable, but once confined, more money will dare to come in.
Finally, a practical question: if one day someone really blocks your door, is your current asset arrangement strong enough to hold up?Not long ago, Upbit announced the launch of $GRVT. Immediately after, $GRVT surged dramatically. After the surge, I looked at the changes in $GRVT's data, which attracted a lot of bears. I believe many readers of my article are also shorting it. My view is somewhat different from others, and I believe now is not a good time to short it. It is very likely to stab upward; leaving this position empty now is too dangerous. Why do I think so? Because I saw something different from the data. —————————————————— Let's look at its contract data. It can be seen that after its surge, its contract holdings increased sharply, and the long-short ratio quickly declined. This shows that at the start of the rally, there were indeed many short sellers. But let's look at the next segment, which is after 3 PM. We can see that its contract open interest is still increasing, but the long-short ratio is starting to rise. This shows that even at this position, there are still people willing to go long. Let's take the latter part separately. It can be seen that during periods of rising open interest, the contract long-short ratio basically rises. This shows that even at such a high level, there is still a large amount of capital willing to go long. Personally, I think this coin might be bought by Koreans. Everyone knows the South Korean nature of crypto trading—they really leverage aggressively. That means the coin is very likely to skyrocket. So I accept itWho is counting the real stock behind the tokenized US stocks you bought?
This afternoon at 16:14, Reality, the licensed RWA issuance platform under Bitget, announced that it will upgrade cooperation with the US auditing firm The Network Firm. From now on, it will issue a reserve proof audit report daily according to the assurance standards of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
The term "reserve proof" sounds impressive, but simply put, it means sending a third party every day to count the contents of the safe deposit box to verify whether the token you hold is truly backed by a corresponding stock or ETF held in a custody account. Previously, such audits were done once a month at best; now it’s daily.
The underlying stocks are held at Alpaca Securities, a US broker registered with FINRA and protected by SIPC. In other words, the issuer is one party, the auditor another, and the custodian a third, all independent of each other. This tripartite structure is the real focus of this news, not how many tokens have been issued.
To give a sense of scale, Reality currently supports 634 tokenized stocks and ETFs, which can be used on Bitget for unified account margin and pledged loans. This system has been live for just one month, and its managed assets have already exceeded $100 million.
Interestingly, on the same day, Binance announced that at 20:00 tonight, it will add 10 new bStocks tokenized securities as qualified collateral. The list includes BitMine, Super Micro, IREN, ASML, Netflix, AST SpaceMobile, Coherent, Credo, USA Rare Earth, and Astera Labs. These can be directly used for full-position leverage and unified account trading.
One company is busy showing its books daily, while the other is busy encouraging you to leverage these stocks. The directions are completely different, but both point to the same thing: the tokenized US stock sector has moved from the launch phase into the stage of competing for user funds.
There’s also a figure most people don’t pay attention to. RootData today analyzed the spreads on stock derivatives exchanges. Among the top 20, the three with the largest spreads are BingX at 0.299%, OrangeX at 0.281%, and Aster at 0.182%. KuCoin at 0.133% and Phemex at 0.142% also exceed 0.1%. This spread is the weighted bid-ask difference based on 24-hour trading volume. Simply put, before you even start making money, you lose a toll fee each time you enter and exit. 0.299% doesn’t sound like much, but try doing ten short-term round trips.
Putting these three things together, the picture becomes clear. Auditing is intensifying, leverage is increasing, but friction costs are hidden in the least noticeable places. For traders like us who do swing trading, the takeaway is straightforward: when choosing a platform for these tokenized assets, don’t just look at how many stocks it offers. The spread and reserve transparency are two factors—one determines your cost per trade, the other determines whether you can get your assets back in extreme cases.
Looking further, this sector is basically decoupled from BTC’s market. BTC is still hovering around 63,000 to 64,000 with no improvement in panic sentiment, but the trading volume of stock derivatives on exchanges is rising daily. It’s the same market, just with different players at a different table. The funds haven’t left; the attention has.
In the short term, this isn’t good for crypto-native assets, as liquidity is being divided. In the long term, if tokenized stocks can truly achieve daily audits and tripartite segregation, then this is not just a gimmick for exchanges to attract new users, but a rewrite of the traditional asset settlement method. These two things don’t conflict; they just happen at different speeds.
To ask plainly: when you choose a tokenized US stock platform, do you first look at how many stocks it offers, or do you first check who is counting the real stocks behind your tokens? Family, today the Korean stock market went crazy, with the index jumping more than 4 points. SK Hynix surged nearly 8% at one point and closed up almost 8%, outperforming Samsung Electronics' 6% gain.
On the surface, it looks like a rebound following the US semiconductor stocks, but the deeper reason is that Hynix's "quiet period" ended yesterday.
What is the quiet period?
Simply put, the company issued its ADR on July 10 and then had 25 days during which it couldn't make any statements. Once August 4 passed, the market immediately started speculating: is a buyback announcement coming?
Independent analyst Douglas Kim directly stated: "Considering the end of the quiet period, SK Hynix is very likely to soon announce a major shareholder return plan, possibly including a combination of stock buybacks, share cancellations, and special dividends."
Is the buyback likely?
Highly probable. The company already promised in April to expand shareholder returns starting in 2026. Korean media reported in June that the company might launch a shareholder return plan worth up to 100 trillion KRW (about $66.4 billion) in Q4 this year.
Although the company later denied the specific "100 trillion" figure, it never denied the existence of a buyback plan. Several brokerages, including William Blair, have already given a "buy" rating to Hynix ADR overnight.
So is the recent rise because of this?
Partly. The continuous rebound in US semiconductor stocks provided confidence, but Hynix outperforming Samsung (Hynix up 8% vs. Samsung 6%) shows the market is indeed pricing in buyback expectations separately.
The earnings call on July 29 mentioned that a shareholder return plan would be disclosed, but since no details were given, the stock price dropped nearly 10% that day. The market has waited so long, and now that the quiet period is over, naturally it’s starting to run ahead.
How to operate?
In this kind of news-driven market, chasing highs can easily lead to getting trapped. If a buyback announcement really comes out, the spike could be a chance to reduce holdings.
Wait for a pullback if you want to participate. UBS’s target price is 3 million KRW (about $215), maintaining a "buy" rating. Daiwa’s target price is also around this range. This indicates institutions believe there is still room at the current level, but don’t expect a one-shot surge.
You can still play before the news materializes; once it does, it’s time to "sell the news." What do you think—will this buyback happen as scheduled? Share your judgment in the comments. #闪迪财报前夕，HBF与存储紧缺引发热议 $SOL rose about 1.05% in the past 24 hours, but this rebound has not yet seen new demand catching up.
At the same time, Binance spot active buy/sell ratio is only 0.90, with active sell trades still more; USD-M open interest increased by only about 0.03%, basically unchanged. In other words, the price is moving up, but spot buying and contract positions have not accelerated together. It currently looks more like passive buying is absorbing the supply, rather than funds starting to chase the price.
Historically, among 86 samples where SOL closed below MA20, MA20 was below MA50, and the daily rebound was at least 0.5%, the next day continued to rise 43 times, with a baseline of only 50%, and the average next-day return was about -0.09%. So for now, this is noted as an observation without giving a directional bias.
In the next 24 hours, watch two things: whether the spot ratio can sustain above 1, and whether open interest can moderately expand when the price recovers the daily MA20. Both conditions appearing simultaneously would confirm demand for the rebound; if the spot ratio remains below 1 and the price weakens, it indicates this support is not solid.
#SOL #MarketDivergence #财报观察员：Mixed earnings, lock-up expiration approaching! What’s next for SpaceX?
SpaceX (SPCX) reported core metrics in its first earnings that exceeded expectations, but the market is more focused on the selling pressure from the approximately 911.5 million shares (about 20%) unlocking on August 6. The short-term pressure logic holds, but the long-term fundamentals remain intact. Your observations align well with public information.
Earnings highlights (Q2 2026, released after market close on August 4)
Revenue was about $7.8 billion, up 92% year-over-year, significantly exceeding Wall Street expectations (around $6.8-6.9 billion range). Net loss narrowed to about $541 million (compared to about $1 billion in the same period last year), and operating loss also improved substantially. Starlink (connectivity business) continues to be a cash cow: user growth and revenue up about 66% year-over-year, maintaining high profit margins.
Rocket launch frequency and payload capacity remain globally leading. AI business revenue surged (around +250%), but capital expenditures soared to about $18.3-18.4 billion (of which about $15.8 billion is AI-related). Losses narrowed but the company is still burning cash. The outlook is positive, mentioning year-end revenue run rate targets, Starlink expansion, and AI compute recovery cycles.
After-hours stock price dropped (reported about 7-9%), consistent with the description of “good earnings but market not buying it” — investors are more concerned about the sustainability of high capital expenditures and the upcoming lock-up supply shock, rather than simply questioning growth quality.
Lock-up details
August 6 is the first staggered lock-up release day: about 911.5 million insider/early shareholder shares become tradable, a large proportion (relative to the currently smaller public float, potentially significantly amplifying tradable supply, with some reports suggesting it could double or more).
Early investors with very low cost have strong incentives to take profits. Historically, similar large-scale IPO lock-up expirations have seen intense capital battles, with short-term selling pressure common. There will be subsequent staggered releases (such as later 7% tranches, Q3 related, etc.), with a significant increase in supply throughout the year, but core holdings like Musk’s have longer lock-up periods. This is not dilution with new shares, but existing shares entering circulation, creating real supply-demand rebalancing pressure.
Short-term stock price pressure probability is high, with volatility amplified around lock-up dates. Observing actual trading volume, who is selling, and institutional buying strength is more meaningful than daily price changes. If the stock price stabilizes or rebounds after lock-up, it better reflects genuine demand recognition.
Long-term logic
Fundamental strengths remain: Starlink user and revenue growth continues, leading launch capabilities, vertical integration advantages, AI direction (compute + applications) aligns with long-term trends, and narrowing losses are a positive signal. Musk-affiliated companies often follow a “high investment for scale, initial volatility then payoff” model.
The lock-up wave is a phased supply event and does not change core growth drivers like Starlink commercialization, launch reusability, and AI infrastructure. Long-term investors can view the lock-up window as an observation/potential entry opportunity rather than a panic exit signal — but must closely monitor subsequent capital expenditure discipline, AI monetization progress, and actual selling scale.
Summary: Your judgment of “short-term pressure, long-term logic intact, observation window” is reasonable. The lock-up is a Damocles sword, but SpaceX’s execution and business diversity provide a buffer. Pay attention to trading and capital flows on August 6 and the following days, combined with next quarter’s guidance for clearer insight. The market will ultimately vote with real money.#AMD earnings exceed expectations, is growth already priced in? The better AMD's earnings, the more the stock falls? The market is no longer trading on growth, but on "growth exceeding expectations"
AMD's earnings report is actually quite interesting.
Revenue was $11.54 billion, up 50% year-over-year, with data center business reaching $6.7 billion, up 107% year-over-year, and AI chip demand remains strong. Looking purely at fundamentals, this is a very impressive report card.
But the market's reaction was very direct:
After-hours drop of over 8%.
Why?
Because the biggest issue in the AI sector now is not "whether there is growth," but:
Can your growth exceed the script the market has already written in advance?
I believe AMD's recent decline is more like a "re-pricing after fulfilling high expectations," rather than the market rejecting AMD.
In recent years, the AI wave has opened new valuation space for semiconductor companies.
Investors no longer focus just on:
"How much will you earn this year?"
But ask instead:
"How much speed can you maintain over the next 3 years?"
AMD's data center revenue doubling in one year is no longer the growth rate of an ordinary growth stock.
But the problem is, when the market has already assigned a high valuation based on the AI supercycle, even excellent earnings reports may only become:
"In line with expectations."
This reminds me of the past trends of many AI stocks.
During the rise:
The market trades on imagination.
For example:
AI demand explosion
Cloud providers' continuous investment
GPU supply shortages
Data center expansion
But after reaching a high point:
The market trades on validation.
For example:
Can gross margins still improve?
Are AI orders sustained?
Is product competitiveness expanding?
Is future guidance being revised upward?
AMD's Q3 revenue guidance is about $13 billion, which exceeds the market average expectation but does not meet some institutions' more aggressive targets, which is one of the important reasons for the stock price pressure.
So if I were an investor, I would not simply judge:
"Earnings up = buy"
or:
"Stock price down = bad news."
I would look at three signals:
First, whether AI revenue growth continues.
AMD's biggest focus now is not CPU, but data center and AI acceleration business.
If high growth can be maintained in the next few quarters, the market will raise valuations again.
Second, look at profit margins.
Revenue growth is good, but the AI industry ultimately competes on profitability.
If revenue increases but profit margins cannot improve, the market may think:
"Just selling more hardware, not building a long-term moat."
Third, look at AI ecosystem competition.
AMD is not just selling chips but challenging giants with established ecosystem advantages.
What will truly determine valuation in the future is whether AMD can move from being the "second choice in AI" to an "important AI supplier."
My view:
$AMD's current problem is not insufficient growth, but overly high market expectations.
For growth stocks, the most dangerous phase is often not poor performance, but:
Good performance, but not good enough to exceed everyone's fantasies.
So when looking at the AI sector, don't just focus on single-quarter earnings.
What really deserves long-term attention is:
· Whether growth continues
· Whether profits improve
· Whether competitive advantages expand
The future AI market will definitely continue to differentiate.
The real winners may not be the fastest-growing companies, but those that can continuously prove their value.Having a license = standard configuration ≠ success
In the past two months, I believe everyone's timeline has been flooded with news about exchanges launching securities direct connection services and encompassing brokerage functions.
But after seeing many platforms repeatedly emphasize "we can buy US stocks" for a while,
everyone can look at a piece of data disclosed in FINRA's annual report: last year, about 100 brokerages opened in the market, while more than 160 closed.
Moreover, the number of brokerages has been declining for many years.
It's not that exchanges can't succeed in this business, but this market has existed for a long time, and obtaining business qualifications is only the first step.
The exchanges' "stablecoin system + 7×24H" certainly has objective advantages, as it solves the traditional restrictions of deposit thresholds and trading hours.
But ultimately, this business competes on operational customer acquisition costs and product experience.
To repeat: having a license = standard configuration ≠ success.
Entering this market means facing an environment with competition even fiercer than crypto exchanges, and traditional financial institutions are also working on the "stablecoin system + 7×24H".
The competitive landscape is intensifying, but the market size remains the same.
Without finding external growth points and only competing for existing volume, it remains an internal functional self-satisfaction within the circle.The reduction in selling pressure and resulting supply contraction is the fundamental reason for the price rebound. The market information, projects, currencies, and other information, opinions, and judgments mentioned in this report are for reference only and do not constitute any investment advice. Written by 0xWeilan @eMerge IS In July 2026, $BTC BTC experienced a structural rebound after a sharp 20.45% drop in June, rising 7.32% for the month and rebounding from $58,544 to $62,830.58, reaching a monthly high of $66,508.72. This rebound occurred amid a sustained rise in U.S. Treasury real yields, marginal tightening of Fed liquidity, rapid increases in crude oil prices, and widespread pressure on tech stocks, indicating that the July BTC price movement was not driven by improved macrofinancial conditions but mainly benefited from changes in the internal supply structure and holder behavior of the crypto market. The most notable change in the internal market is the whale shark group (addresses holding more than 100 BTC) continuously absorbing floating tokens. This group increased their holdings by a total of 47,340.37 BTC in July, bringing their total holdings to 10.623 million BTC, with the annual absorption rate rising from 30.84% to 41.21%. Meanwhile, the average daily net BTC inflow on exchanges dropped from 1,267.7 in June to 332, a decrease of 73.81%, indicating that although total exchange balances still increased slightly, the pace at which new saleable tokens entered the market during the month slowed significantly. This internal repair, driven by supply contraction, makes BT the Rocket48-hour countdown! US-Iran standoff escalates, crypto market faces a major test!!
On August 5, the US-Iran situation played out as a fierce Rashomon, with Trump setting a 48-hour deadline for the agreement result, rattling global assets and the crypto market.
Trump publicly stated that US-Iran negotiations are progressing smoothly, with results to be revealed within 48 hours, and the Strait of Hormuz expected to reopen; at the same time, he issued a tough warning that if Iran reneges, it will be "severely hit," revealing that a large-scale military strike was originally prepared.
However, Iran responded firmly, stating it will never sign any agreement under the shadow of military threats, and as long as US military deterrence exists, the Strait of Hormuz-related agreement will be delayed. The core contradiction between the two sides is clear:
The US intends to pressure Iran into concessions through military means, while Iran refuses coercive negotiations and only accepts Oman as a mediator.
There are three main possible market developments:
Medium probability: a verbal temporary understanding is reached. The US softens its harsh rhetoric, partial navigation through the strait resumes, but no formal written agreement. Oil prices weaken, and risk assets like BTC rebound.
Baseline high probability: stalemate after the deadline. No substantial results after 48 hours, both sides continue media battles, maintaining the status quo. Previous easing expectations are dashed,
major assets enter volatile swings driven by news. ⚠️ Note: The 48-hour deadline is a media pressure point, not necessarily a trigger for war.
Low probability, high risk: conflict escalates. Negotiations completely break down leading to military action, strait shipping is obstructed. Crude oil surges, US stocks and cryptocurrencies collectively plunge, altcoins fall sharply.
Focus on hard signals, do not trust verbal statements lightly: private news of Oman's mediation, tanker traffic and insurance rates in the Strait of Hormuz, and actual posture changes from both US and Iran.
Attention ⚠️⚠️
The market has already priced in easing expectations in advance; without substantial progress, optimism may quickly fade,
leading to a short squeeze counterattack, and the crypto market may face a correction. Geopolitical tail risks need to be watched!! $BTC $ETH