Orbit Post Sitemap

Monday Opening|Gold at 4600, BTC fluctuates, debt risk-off market, keep an eye on the Jackson Hole Symposium this week This round of the market is no longer a simple interest rate trade. The US debt scale has exceeded 40 trillion dollars, long-term US Treasuries continue to be sold off by the market, and the Treasury's expansion of long-term bond repurchases can only temporarily ease pressure on the bond market, unable to resolve the fundamental fiscal contradictions. Past market logic: when US Treasury yields rise, gold and BTC come under pressure and fall. But now an abnormal phenomenon appears: with US Treasury yields high, gold and BTC strengthen simultaneously. Capital is trading US fiscal credit risk, starting to cluster around two types of scarce assets without sovereign credit backing. Gold is a millennia-old physical hard currency, with global central banks continuously buying gold to form a bottom support; gold ETF funds are significantly flowing back, and institutional allocation demand is rising. BTC, as a digital scarce asset, continues to attract funds through spot ETFs, absorbing profit-taking pressure on the market; although prices fluctuate, institutional buying has not exited. The two have completely different attributes, but their underlying narrative highly overlaps: hedging against the uncertainty of the dollar system. Good morning to all friends on the planet. Recently, OKX launched $STRC, so today let's talk about how it operates‼️ STRC (floating rate perpetual preferred stock issued by Strategy Inc.) has a par value of 100 USD. Its core mechanism is to anchor the secondary market price near 100 USD by dynamically adjusting the monthly dividend rate. If the STRC price continuously stays below 100 USD and cannot rebound, it will have the following direct impacts on Strategy's capital operation model and investors: 1. Core financing mechanism stalls (ATM flywheel interruption) Unable to issue new shares to buy coins: The core purpose of Strategy setting up STRC is to raise cash to buy Bitcoin through on-exchange issuance (ATM) of new shares at a premium or par value. According to issuance rules and economic logic, ATM issuance is only effective and feasible when STRC trades above the 100 USD par value. Low-cost leverage fails: Continuous price break means the company loses a channel to continuously obtain low-dilution funds through preferred shares and is forced to turn to issuing common stock (MSTR), convertible bonds, or pure debt instruments. 2. The company faces dual pressure on dividends and cash flow Interest rate dilemma: Mechanically, when the market price is below 100 USD, the board is motivated to raise the annual dividend rate to attract buying and push the price back to par. But excessively high dividend rates directly increase the company's monthly rigid cash outflows. USD reserve depletion and coin selling pressure:Many people overlook one thing: the institutional funds buying $BTC and those positioning in $ETH are fundamentally not the same group. Can ETH2400 hold steady? This wave won't reach 2800; at most, it will rally a little before pulling back. The main focus is on the 26th and 27th. Institutions allocating to BTC mostly treat it as a digital reserve asset, aiming for broad asset diversification and hedging, valuing scarcity, and not needing to understand complex on-chain logic. As long as the macro environment is stable, they will continue to allocate. Institutions willing to buy ETH need to understand staking yields, layer-2 networks, real-world asset tokenization, and the entire narrative. This creates a very realistic phenomenon: when the macro environment warms up, funds flow into BTC first; only when market risk appetite fully opens and production asset logic is accepted will incremental funds flood into ETH on a large scale. In a stock game market, it often happens that BTC stabilizes the base while ETH repeatedly grinds down. Don’t assume ETH will explode just because the overall market stabilizes; the cognitive threshold of funds will genuinely reflect in the price movement.$ZEC breaks through $875 to hit an eight-year high, with spot trading at $1.06 billion and futures at $9.5 billion showing extreme imbalance; leverage accumulation squeezing market liquidity depth is the current core contradiction. Against a spot turnover of only $1.06 billion, derivatives turnover reaches $9.5 billion, a nearly 9x volume ratio indicating that the main driving force behind this rally comes from contract-side speculation. The fundamental recovery logic was established after Ironwood privacy pool completed formal verification, with the network-wide circulation's independent verification capability eliminating the supply-side trust discount caused by old vulnerabilities. Grayscale plans to convert the trust into an ETF coded ZCSH and apply for listing on NYSE Arca, introducing expectations of revaluation by compliant funds, which, resonating with high-leverage liquidity, has lifted the price slope. The bullish scenario requires spot funds to take over. If daily spot turnover expands to over $2.5 billion and the derivatives-to-spot turnover ratio converges to within 3x, the price will continue upward after breaking $875 to seek new highs; if open interest in contracts simultaneously drops sharply, this inference fails. The bearish scenario is triggered by profit-taking or deleveraging squeeze in derivatives. If the price falls below $780 causing a high-level long liquidation, outflows from derivatives will quickly overwhelm spot buying capacity, leading to a rapid pullback; if spot buying surges to absorb chips during the pullback, the bearish path fails. In the next 24 hours, key observations should focus on whether spot turnover can follow through with expansion and whether the derivatives-to-spot volume ratio remains persistently above the overheated threshold of 5x. #财报观察员:泡泡玛特增长换挡,多IP能否接力? #Anthropic拟8月底公开IPO文件,募资或追平SpaceX#黄金突破4600美元,债券避险地位受挑战 Spot gold in August rose nearly 13% within the month, breaking through 4600 USD in one go. This round of market movement is driven by a short-term catalyst, macro expectations, structural buying, and capital inflows all resonating together. An abnormal phenomenon has appeared: U.S. Treasury yields remain high while gold rises simultaneously, causing the traditional interest rate pricing logic to fail. 1. Direct trigger: U.S. Treasury expands long-term bond repurchase (August 19) The Treasury announced raising the single repurchase limit for 10-30 year long-term bonds from 2 billion to 4 billion USD to alleviate the pressure from long-term bond sell-offs $XAU #黄金突破4600美元,债券避险地位受挑战 The financial market recently staged a "counterintuitive" drama — gold rises, Bitcoin rises, and U.S. Treasury yields also rise. According to textbooks, these three should move inversely, but this time, they are celebrating together. Spot gold has climbed above $4600/oz, hitting a three-month high, with a cumulative increase of nearly 13% in August. Bitcoin surged even more dramatically, soaring from $62,000 to $78,000, a weekly jump of over 23%, marking the largest weekly gain since March 2023. Ethereum broke above $2500, rising more than 9% intraday. Nearly 190,000 crypto investors worldwide were liquidated, with short position liquidations totaling as much as $1.236 billion. What happened? On August 18, U.S. Treasury data showed the federal debt officially surpassed $40 trillion. It took less than five months to go from $39 trillion to $40 trillion. For every $5 collected in federal tax revenue, $1 is used to pay interest. On August 19, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen took emergency action, announcing that the repurchase scale of 10- to 30-year Treasury bonds would double from $2 billion to $4 billion each time. But the "rescue" effect lasted less than a day — after a brief drop, long-term yields quickly rebounded, with the 30-year yield reaching 5.337%, a new high since 2007. The market's implied message is: the "world's safest asset," U.S. Treasuries, may not be so safe anymore. Funds are starting to seek assets "not reliant on any government credit." Gold is the first choice, followed closely by Bitcoin. BlackRock says the BTC bubble has been completely purged. I believe half of that. When institutions say "it's safe," it's often to make it easier for themselves to enter, not to warn you to sell at the top. But you have to admit the holding structure is indeed cleaner than last year. Do you think this is the bottom or halfway up the mountain? $BTC The Ministry of Finance doubling the long-term debt repurchase is more substantial than any BTC bullish news. Money flows from the bond market into risk assets, and BTC is the first to receive the inflow. But remember: the hand supporting the market can also withdraw. You are betting on continued liquidity or an abrupt shift. $BTC Sweden's H100 lost 26 million this quarter due to BTC depreciation. Companies hoarding coins are treasures when prices rise but landmines when they fall. Many listed companies have their balance sheets tied to BTC this round; when a black swan event hits, it's not the coins that explode but them. Would you dare to touch these Bitcoin concept stocks? $BTC 周一開磐先关注原油和美元指数,其次黄金,最后股市 前面两个直接影响黄金月尾能否继续上扬 这三者的关系近两个月发生了巧妙的转变 先说原油(俗称黑金,布雷顿体系之后) 正常情况下原油涨,美元就会涨,黄金就会跌 但对比下面三张图不难发现 原油涨,美元却在跌,然后黄金猛涨 七月非农、CPI等数据降低九月加息预期 主要导火索美债规模突破40萬亿大关(信用危机) 期限溢价导致长端美债收益率飙升(高度波动) 最后传导至加密跟美股(避险和风险偏好情绪同时上升) 可以说只有美元在跌,其他赛道都在涨 这种极端异常情况能否持续运转 就看下周整体的基调了 【若周一原油高開,美元能够恢复和黑金同步的节奏 那么黄金、美股、加密全部承压】(剧本1) 【若美元继续疲软震荡下行 黄金、美股、加密则继续上冲】(剧本2) 以上全部都是一个字一个字地码得(不存在AI) 创作不易,希望大家动动发财的小手三连走起!Hardcore reminder for newcomers: In the early bull market, BTC and ETH always dominate the bloodsucking trend Specifically reminding brothers entering this round, mastering the early bull cycle rules can help avoid 90% of detours. At the start of every bull market cycle, there is inevitably a strong BTC and ETH bloodsucking trend. This is an unchanging ten-year cycle law in the crypto space, and this round will be no exception. This bloodsucking window is very likely coming soon. Here’s the core conclusion: Except for a very few independent altcoins with extremely strong fundamentals, narratives, and capital, the phase tops of most ordinary altcoins have basically completed in the past two days. Blindly rushing into altcoins now has very low cost-effectiveness and very high risk. Many newcomers don’t understand cycles. Let me review the last two complete bull-bear cycles for you, the pattern is clear: In the last cycle, BTC rebounded from 15,000 to 31,000, leading strongly throughout. Only after this main rally ended did altcoins’ market share truly bottom out and rotation begin; In the cycle before that, BTC rebounded from 3,000 to 13,000. After the doubling main rally ended, altcoins overall started to generate profits. Unified characteristics of all cycles: At the early bull stage, there is absolutely no reason for altcoins to outperform the mainstream. Capital always rotates in a stepped manner: institutions and large funds first support BTC, then overflow to ETH, and only after liquidity floods the market do small and mid-cap altcoins collectively explode. We are currently only in the early bull recovery phase, far from altcoin season. Now, about the current real market situation: Funds still aggressively rushing altcoins are basically all high-leverage contract PVP short-term speculative funds. No continuous spot inflows, no long-term chip accumulation, no real incremental support, just emotion and leverage-driven price rises. This kind of market is most deadly: prices look like they rise daily, but a single spike or liquidity tightening wave can cause deep pullbacks and mass liquidations. So the optimal strategy at this stage is very clear: Better to leverage BTC and ETH steadily to capture certainty than to heavily speculate on unsupported altcoins. Or choose high-Beta mainstream coins and platform tokens, whose safety, fault tolerance, and sustainability far surpass miscellaneous altcoins. Simple summary of this round’s rhythm: 1. Early bull bloodsucking trend is near; BTC and ETH will continue to siphon market liquidity; 2. Most altcoins’ phase tops have appeared; subsequent action will mainly be pullbacks, shakeouts, and slow declines; 3. Altcoin season is still early; chasing highs now is purely emotional takeover; 4. At this stage, only play certainty: mainstream leverage and high-Beta core targets. The most common mistake for newcomers is to dislike BTC’s slow rise early in the bull market and rush into altcoins to gamble on excess returns, only to end up trapped at altcoin highs without profiting from the bull market. Cycles never lie: first hold mainstream, then wait for altcoins—that is the correct rhythm to survive the bull market. ⚠️Personal cycle review thoughts, not investment advice #BTC #ETH #BullMarketRotation #CycleRules #Metaplanet以2100枚BTC控股SuperLeague Long and Short Crowding Rankings Current rates, past payments, and 15-minute price positions combined provide a complete view of sentiment shifts. $GRVT current rate -0.0630%, settled -0.012% in the past 24 hours, at the 1st percentile of recent samples. The 15-minute price position is moving upward in the same direction, risk exposure is expanding, next step is to see if the price can continue to realize gains. During the short payment period, the price position moved up, new positions did not suppress the price, continue to watch if the highs can be pushed higher. $BEAT current rate +0.0428%, settled +0.286% in the past 24 hours, at the 73rd percentile of recent samples. Price position is rising in the same direction, this volatility involves new positions, not purely driven by position reductions. The rate has not reached historical extremes for the same coin, currently reading by price position structure, no additional crowding label applied. $ETH current rate +0.0100%, settled +0.030% in the past 24 hours, at the 100th percentile of recent samples. 15-minute upward position increase indicates new positions are participating in this rise. Long side paying, price and OI still rising, crowding still responsive; loss of price return for new positions would be a weakening signal.No matter how strong the rally is, don't impulsively enter the market; first understand the rules before taking action. Everyone can clearly see how exaggerated this market explosion is: BTC surged rapidly from $64,000, reaching a high of $79,500 on August 21, and is currently retreating to oscillate between $77,000 and $79,000; ETH's weekly gain is close to 30%, standing above $2,400. However, on August 23, the market quickly pulled back from the high, with a total liquidation amount of $880 million across the network within 24 hours, of which long position liquidations accounted for over 80%, resulting in a mass liquidation of chasing bulls. First, clarify the real primary and secondary drivers of this round of rally: The core trigger for the market explosion is the US Treasury's balance sheet expansion, the positive expectations from the White House crypto summit, combined with a concentrated short squeeze of $3 billion in shorts; the net inflow of $1.1 billion over two days into spot ETFs is merely subsequent capital stepping in, not the ignition source of this surge. Participation is possible, but never blindly chase highs just because of bullish candles. To confirm a trend reversal and open a stable entry window, three conditions must be met simultaneously, none can be missing: 1. Price retraces to key zones with reduced volume and stabilizes: BTC holds steady between $74,000–$76,000, ETH holds $2,300–$2,350; 2. On the next rally, spot trading volume reaches at least 1.5 times the 5-day average, confirming incremental capital inflow; 3. Spot ETFs maintain net inflows for 3 consecutive days, indicating uninterrupted institutional buying. If any of these signals are missing, the current rise can only be defined as a short squeeze tail wave, with risks far outweighing profit potential. Now, looking at current risk signals: BTC's daily RSI has reached 82, entering a severe overbought zone, with bullish momentum long exhausted. Meanwhile, whales have cumulatively sold 7,700 BTC over three consecutive days, gradually cashing out at high levels. Chasing now essentially means taking the selling pressure from the main players exiting, paying an expensive "itchy hands" tax. Here are two stable operation plans: Either patiently wait for a retracement to key support and stabilize before buying low to build positions; Or wait for price to break and hold above the $80,000 mark with volume, then follow the trend on the right side. During the middle oscillation and battle range, controlling your hands and minimizing trades is the best risk management. ⚠️This is only a personal market review and does not constitute any investment advice #BTC #ETH #MarketRiskControl #ShortSqueezeMarket #ETFCapitalWatch Bias built from: 1) BTC 4YR time cycles 2) DXY local PO3 low due 20 Nov 2026 (Major low not due till May 2027 though) 3) 28KD SPX Time Cycle low due Oct 2027 Price wise, on bitcoin, for me flipping $87k into support triggers reassessment of bias. My main price zones of interest locally are clearly shown. I do have a personal bias for trading PO3 more successfully than SFP trades, so that also likely influences my structural forecasting here. In addition I likely have some recency bias due to thFrom $250 to $860: $ZEC Strongly Hits an Eight-Year High In just two months, a stunning reversal was completed, with ZEC experiencing a textbook case of all negative factors being exhausted, completely rewriting the phase pattern of its price. Looking back at the June turmoil, the Orchard privacy pool exposed a high-risk vulnerability, theoretically posing a risk of token forgery. Although subsequent checks found no evidence of malicious exploitation, market panic over the integrity of token supply quickly escalated, causing the price to plummet sharply from around $630 to below $250, suffering a short-term halving blow. Now the market has completely turned around: according to OKX market data, $ZEC has returned to the $840 range, reaching an intraday high of $875, setting a new price high not seen in eight years. This rapid reversal relies on two core hard positives: 1. Complete elimination of technical risks The new Ironwood privacy pool has completed formal verification, isolating the risks of the old Orchard pool. The total circulating supply can be independently verified, completely dispelling market concerns about token supply forgery, and the protocol’s security fundamentals have returned to stability. 2. Institutional compliance narrative reignited Grayscale is fully advancing the process of converting the Zcash trust into an ETF, planning to list under the code ZCSH on the NYSE Arca exchange. The privacy sector is once again attracting institutional capital attention, opening up a long-term valuation ceiling with compliance expectations. However, there are obvious hidden risks in the current market, and the heat is clearly overheated: ZEC futures trading volume reaches $9.5 billion, while spot trading volume is only $1.06 billion. The derivatives volume is nearly 9 times that of spot, and this round of price increase largely relies on leveraged funds pushing it up. Summary of the current logic: This surge is supported by the fundamentals of protocol security repair and Grayscale ETF expectations, while derivatives leverage plays a strong accelerating role. Going forward, it is crucial to closely watch whether spot funds can continue to enter and take over. Once the hype around positive news fades and leveraged funds take profits and exit, the speed of price decline may be no slower than the previous rise. ⚠️This is only a review and analysis of the coin’s market performance and does not constitute any investment advice #ZEC #PrivacyCoin #EightYearHigh #GrayscaleETF #特朗普媒体链上转账2628BTC,性质未披露 $ZEC is currently worth about 13 billion USD. $NEAR still hovers around 2.5 billion USD. Over 1.5 billion USD worth of ZEC trading volume has been processed through NEAR Intents. Zashi uses NEAR Intents to allow users to directly swap $BTC, stablecoins, and other assets into ZEC. Intents charges fees from this process, then uses a portion of the protocol's share to buy NEAR and remove it from circulation. In the past 30 days, it has collected about 2.76 million USD in fees and retained 557,000 USD as protocol revenue. For a coin worth 2.5 billion USD, this isn't huge, but at least there is something real to track. If privacy features continue to operate and more people move funds into ZEC, how much of that activity will eventually turn into NEAR buybacks? Because NEAR's own on-chain revenue still barely reaches about 1,500 USD per day, and no one needs to hold NEAR to use Intents. So token capture still has a lot to prove. But with ZEC valued at 13 billion USD and NEAR only at 2.5 billion USD, I think the gap is significant, especially if Intents' revenue starts moving with ZEC trading volume. Ethereum long positions are already extremely crowded. If you don't short now, who will? 📉 After reviewing on-chain and contract data, the situation is extremely extreme: a massive amount of institutional funds are frantically flowing into longs, and ETH's long/short ratio has soared to an astonishing 500%! 🔥 This means the market is highly unanimous in bullish sentiment, with almost everyone betting that Ethereum is about to catch up. Even more noteworthy is that there are currently as many as 17 massive long contracts piled up on the market, with a nominal value reaching billions of dollars; These positions already have unrealized gains exceeding $73 million. Market participants generally believe ETH will take off quickly and break through with catch-up gains, showing strong confidence. But the problem lies precisely here. Ethereum's current market cap is too heavy, and with excessive concentration of long positions, this "car" is overloaded, making it difficult for major funds to easily push the market up. Without a deep shakeout to clear leveraged accounts, a real upward trend is hard to start healthily. Crowded long trades often mean potential pullback risks are accumulating, and once the market turns, the stampede effect can be very intense. From a short-term trading perspective, chasing long positions at this level is definitely unwise. A more rational strategy might be to try a short position in the short term and play for a major pullback correction. Of course, this is only a strategic move in response to the current overheated sentiment, not a long-term judgment. The market must always be wary of the reverse risk behind "consensus expectations," especially when leverage ratios are so extremeThe security of a public Chain is not written in a whitepaper; it is tested with real money. BounceBit was attacked due to an authorization vulnerability, with about 286.5 million BB tokens transferred from 9 wallets, valued at approximately 3 million USD. After the project team suspended block production, they decided to permanently shut down their own L1 and reissue BB on BNB Chain. This is somewhat bearish for BB. The official statement said that private keys, wallets, and main products were not compromised, and they promised to reissue tokens based on a snapshot taken before the attack. However, the forced exit of an L1 directly undermines market trust in its underlying security and long-term roadmap. In the short term, the focus is not on the migration narrative but on exchange balance restoration, liquidity of the new BEP-20 token, and user sell pressure. The rebound is more likely to face confidence discounting. BNB Chain has caught this wave of migration, with the impact being neutral to slightly positive. Source: The Block #BB #BNB #Crypto100WEvery time there's tension in the Middle East, people in the comments shout "safe haven, safe haven, bullish for Bitcoin." The Iranian parliament just passed a fee on ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, and the US military has imposed a maritime blockade in the Arabian Sea, intercepting more than seventy commercial vessels—is this really bullish for crypto? I advise you to look at oil first. When the strait is blocked, shipping and insurance costs rise, pushing oil prices up. What that leads to is inflation, and inflation leads to "delayed rate cuts or even no cuts at all." In this macro framework, war is first priced as rate hikes, not as a safe haven. Who suffers from rate hikes? All risk assets inflated by liquidity, with $BTC being the first. Don't apply the 2020 mindset of "war makes gold and Bitcoin rise together" to now. Look at the 2-year US Treasury, look at oil, not sentiment. If you get the direction wrong, even the best positions are giveaways.Kashkari came out on Sunday saying: The Treasury market is functioning normally, and I don't currently believe inflation will return to target in the short term. In plain language—don't expect us to rush to cut rates and flood the market. The 10-year yield is at 4.73%, and the 30-year is still lingering near the highest level since 2007. Many who shout "bull return" are actually betting on "the Fed will eventually flood the market to support prices," but Powell's people keep coming out to pour cold water, and inflation remains sticky and won't go down. Liquidity is the water level of the market. If the water level doesn't rise, just pushing prices up with sentiment alone will only make the fall hurt more the higher it goes. I'm not saying a crash is imminent, but don't take "the central bank will come to save me" as a reason to go all in—that's the most expensive wishful thinking for retail investors. The fuel for this $BTC short squeeze is not sparked by fundamentals.Once ETH strengthens, there is indeed a historical inertia of funds flowing into DOGE, which has been a repeatedly played "transmission chain" in past bull markets. Looking back at 2017 and 2021, the market rhythm was astonishingly consistent: first, Bitcoin attracted capital and established the bull market, then ETH, as the leading altcoin, took over the rally. When ETH's gains began to plateau and profit-taking sought outlets with higher elasticity, coins like DOGE, which have the strongest retail sentiment, experienced an explosion. The first quarter of 2021 is the most typical example: ETH doubled first, resetting market expectations for the altcoin season, followed by $DOGE delivering tens of times gains over several months. The timing lagged behind $ETH but far exceeded its elasticity. In the partial rotation at the end of 2024, the same script played out again—after ETH stabilized, DOGE quickly became a frequent top gainer. The logic behind this pattern is not complicated. ETH strengthening itself is the most effective "starting gun" for the altcoin season, signaling a rise in market risk appetite; DOGE, lacking complex fundamentals and priced almost entirely by sentiment and liquidity, naturally becomes a high-beta outlet for overflow funds. In other words, ETH is the thermometer, DOGE is the amplifier. I laid out a $BTC bullish scenario because the weekly candle will print a buy signal. This time would be different: - This would be the shortest bear market ever - Bitcoin has always retested the average buy price which is still downward sloping at $51,926 - Potential profit has always gone negative, still positive Bear case: IF price stalls out at the $82,000 area and does not make a higher high and starts to breakdown from upward trend line, THEN it's possible this bear market becomes an ext❓What if $58k really was the bottom of the bear market? Then it would be the first bear market in history where $BTC never reached the CVDD ($49k) This time, $BTC didn’t even touch the Realized Price ($52.7k)! In previous bear markets, $BTC spent quite a bit of time below that level Something doesn’t add up here$SOL on-chain tokenized stock single-quarter trading volume reached $5.8 billion, but high turnover and liquidity gaps during traditional market closures constitute the core contradiction. Market data shows that the total locked value of $SOL on-chain RWA has surpassed $4 billion, hitting a record high. In Q2, tokenized stock DEX trading volume surged 114% quarter-over-quarter to $5.8 billion. This data concentrates about 95% of the global tokenized stock DEX share on a single network, confirming the aggregation effect of high-frequency settlement on on-chain US stock liquidity. The factors driving capital flow are ranked as follows: deep matching of on-chain spot and derivatives comes first, followed by the ability to absorb funds during cross-market closures, and lastly, the capital diversion to competing networks like $ETH, $BNB, $AVAX, and $LINK in the RWA field. The bullish scenario triggers if $SOL on-chain tokenized stock daily trading volume remains high and RWA locked value stays above $4 billion, which will reduce trading friction costs and attract continuous net inflows from institutional-level capital pools; if DEX weekly trading volume growth turns negative and locked value falls below $4 billion, this scenario is invalidated. The bearish scenario triggers if large unilateral sell-offs occur during traditional financial market closures, causing bid-ask spreads to widen due to lack of underlying market maker support, leading to on-chain tokenized asset liquidity discounts and capital outflows; if DEX market-making depth significantly increases during closures and spreads remain stable, the bearish scenario is invalidated. The core observation variables for the next 7 days are whether $SOL on-chain tokenized stock DEX trading volume can maintain Q2 daily average levels and the effectiveness of the $4 billion RWA locked value support threshold. #黄金突破4600美元,债券避险地位受挑战 #Anthropic拟8月底公开IPO文件,募资或追平SpaceXBut I increasingly feel that those who truly use Hyperliquid long-term for trading may not become the ultimate main buyers of these meme coins. Of course, this doesn't mean they won't skyrocket. As long as market sentiment and liquidity are in place, they can also trigger a frenzied rally. It's just that the trading logic may be essentially no different from the memes on the SOL chain—the same group of speculators, the same funds, the same FOMO, just temporarily changing the stage and continuing a new meme celebration on HyperEVM. Recently, Hyperliquid's popularity has clearly risen, with regulatory narratives and market attention pushing HYPE to become one of the key focal points in the current crypto market. The expansion of the HyperEVM ecosystem is also attracting more projects and liquidity. So the key isn't "whether HyperEVM's meme has a real user base," but rather: where attention is went, liquidity may go there. Today everyone is speculating on Memes on SOL, and tomorrow they might all rush to HyperEVM. Traders are always looking for the next casino—now it's just a different table. 😅At the time, many people thought my judgment was too crazy. Because I am betting on a market change that has barely occurred before. They said I entered too early. They say real buying opportunities should wait until Q4. They believe that the cycle of history will repeat itself. But ultimately, the market structure changed. Setting an all-time high (ATH) ahead of the halving completely changed the rhythm of traditional cycles. I have always believed that the most important thing is not to mechanically replicate the past four-year cycle, but to observe the signals quietly changing market rules. And recent market trends seem to prove this once again. $BTC surged to nearly $79,500 this week, then pulled back to the roughly $77,000–$78,000 range. More importantly, the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF attracted about $1.61B in net inflows in just four trading days, with single-day inflows once exceeding $600M. This indicates that this rally is not just driven by short-term speculation; institutional demand is returning to the market. So now, I'm more certain than ever of one thing: the next time the $BTC hits a new all-time high, we may not need to wait for the traditional cycle to give an answer. ETF funding, institutional allocation, regulatory environment, and global liquidity are all changing Bitcoin's cyclical rhythm. My view remains unchanged: while most people are still studying the previous cycle, the market may already be entering the next cycle. And if the current capital trend can...Damn, out of boredom I checked $PUMP, and this thing has quadrupled in just two months! It's not some fake pump; it's real — from the bottom around $0.0012 at the end of June, it surged all the way to over $0.005, rising nearly 180% in just this past month alone. Ultimately, it's because Pump.fun is so powerful. It's the top platform for launching memecoins on Solana, bringing in millions of dollars daily, with an annualized figure that's terrifying. The key is they actually buy back with real money: 50% of their revenue goes directly to buying on the open market, then permanently burning the tokens. Burning like this reduces the circulating supply continuously. Moreover, the team regularly converts $SOL into stablecoins, keeping plenty of cash on hand, so they can buy back whenever they want, support the price whenever needed, or even actively boost it — the cash flow is there, which is the confidence. So I think this rise from the bottom isn't just pure emotional FOMO; as long as the platform's revenue doesn't collapse and buybacks continue, the fundamentals are holding strong. In the short term, I believe it can still climb higher. (Just my own analysis, not investment advice!) #Solana主网提速,节点门槛会否上升? #西联推出稳定币卡,接入Solana生态 A critical reversal 17 minutes before the voting deadline: 540 million OP tokens canceled from retail airdrop, why is L2 abandoning the airdrop hunters in favor of institutions? The Optimism community just witnessed a highly contentious governance drama. With only about 17 minutes left before the vote closed, the funded core development team Test in Prod suddenly cast a crucial 8.486 million OP approval vote, instantly raising the support rate from 45.7% to 61.8%, forcibly passing a highly controversial proposal: reallocating the originally reserved 546.9 million OP tokens for user airdrops entirely to the strategic ecosystem fund managed by the foundation. Despite opposition votes from well-known institutions and researchers including L2BEAT citing lack of transparent oversight, the official team resolutely pushed forward. The signal behind this move is unmistakable: the era of L2 relying on massive retail airdrops to inflate fake TVL and interaction data is completely over. Under a zero-sum game, widespread retail airdrops are immediately dumped after being claimed, failing to build genuine retention. Optimism is decisively shifting to an institutional strategy, using this hundreds of millions of dollars worth of token reserves as commercial bidding ammunition to compete for enterprise giants and super app deployments. This also starkly exposes the harsh reality of DAO governance: when the development team and whales hold absolute chips, retail token holders’ governance rights are inevitably marginalized. BONK faces a tougher setup. The Solana meme coin suffered a major governance security incident, followed by Upbit’s decision to delist it in September. That combination damages liquidity, confidence, and near term demand. Still, BONK retains strong brand recognition across Solana’s retail community. The important signal now is recovery in usage and liquidity, not social hype. Until those improve, rallies should be viewed with caution by experienced traders today overall $BONK Account Position Divergence Radar First, look at how many accounts are betting on a direction, then see how heavy the top positions are. $BEAT The number of accounts and the weight of top positions are still not aligned, so keep the divergence tag for now and leave the next layer to price and positions. Price is going down, positions are also going down; the retreat of positions is more certain than attributing to direction. The account structure is still pulling; price and OI will determine which side truly gains the advantage. $DOGE More accounts are bullish, but the top position weight is bearish; the apparent consensus has not yet translated into position size. Price and positions are moving up together, indicating new positions are involved in this volatility, not just pure position reduction. If the price rises but top positions remain bearish, position conflicts are still likely during pullbacks. $SUI The three metrics are not aligned; market sentiment has not formed a complete consensus. Positions expand while price rises, showing new positions are cooperating with the trend, but OI alone cannot determine bullish or bearish ownership. Each ratio moves independently; short-term trading is better suited to wait for resonance rather than chasing direction based on a single ratio.🔻 $TRX Pulling Back Below $TRX 0.344! TRX is cooling off from its $0.3444 peak, currently trading around $0.3433. * Target: $0.3440 – $0.3458 * Support: $0.3419 – $0.3430 Price is sitting right near short-term MAs—holding above $TRX 0.3420 is crucial to prevent a further dip toward support! 📉 #BTCETFInflowsSurge #OKXTraderVoices At the time, many people thought this judgment was crazy. Because what I bet on is a market change that has hardly ever occurred before. They said I judged too early. They say the real opportunity should wait until Q4. They insist that traditional cycles will repeat again. But the market ultimately proved one thing: setting an all-time high ahead of time before the halving has already changed the rhythm of the entire cycle. In the past, the market habitually operated according to the old four-year cycle. Now, ETFs, institutional capital, and macro liquidity are moving the cycle forward, compressing it, and even changing the original timing patterns. The latest data is beginning to support this change: this week, BTC surged to around $79,500, and the US spot Bitcoin ETF attracted a net inflow of about $1.61B over four trading days, with institutional funds returning to the market. That's why I've always believed: the real advantage isn't predicting everyone's thoughts, but seeing the market structure shift before most people realize it's happening. Last year, the market proved that old cycles do not necessarily repeat completely. So the question now is no longer "Will BTC operate as it did in past cycles?" Instead: When institutional money, ETFs, and global liquidity become the new main drivers, will the next all-time high be faster than in previous cycles? My answer is still yes: very likely. The market does not always reward those who only study the past. It prefers to reward those who can detect early—when the rules have already begun to change. Many people ask me about "the bear market bottoming out and the bull market starting." A few short-term bullish candles lifting the price, and they mistake an oversold rebound for a bull market reversal. This is a typical herd effect driven by FOMO. From the perspective of on-chain structure and liquidity, the real bottom has not yet been cleared: 1. Miner capitulation is not yet complete Every major bear market bottom without exception is accompanied by a wave of miner shutdowns and bankruptcies. Only when the Hash Ribbon shows the ultimate crossover and high-cost producers have sold off can the chips be considered truly transferred from weak hands to strong institutions. Currently, miner inventory has not undergone deep cleansing, so the foundation is very unstable. 2. The derivatives market has not experienced "deep deleveraging" Bottoms without liquidation cascades and liquidity squeezes are false bottoms. The current rebound is mostly driven by contract short covering and short-term spot price increases. The leveraged long positions accumulated above key resistance levels can easily turn into fatal selling pressure, which may lead to a secondary bottom test. 3. The necessity of time to grind the bottom in the cycle Bear market bottoms are never achieved by a sudden sharp rise but through months of sideways consolidation and chip rotation. Blindly calling a bull market ignores the rhythm of macro liquidity withdrawal. Summary: Deleveraging is not thorough enough, miner chips have not been fully released, and the time to grind the bottom is insufficient. I still maintain my original judgment: the market needs a deeper washout, and the real bottom may not come until the end of this year. True hunters only strike when the market is utterly desperate and silent. Time will prove who is swimming naked. Stay calm and watch closely. At the global macro level, there is currently no one-sided driver; the correlation between the US Dollar Index and crypto risk assets has clearly dulled, and the ETH market has returned to a pure chip game state. There are support orders around the current price of 2449, but the active buying is not aggressive enough. Dense limit sell orders are placed between 2456 and 2472, making each upward push heavy. On the downside, there are layered defense orders between 2420 and 2395, with 2395 being the main replenishment area during today's Asian session. The funding rate has returned to neutral to slightly negative, indicating that leveraged longs are not overheated and shorts have not significantly increased; short-term lacks a one-sided sentiment. Just climbed to the sixth floor to put the meal at the door, but the customer didn't open it. I squatted in the hallway catching my breath, the phone screen's reflection made it hard to see, so I wiped it with my sleeve a couple of times and continued watching the K-line. The naked 4-hour K-line has not broken out with volume, so it is temporarily treated as range-bound. As long as 2388 is not effectively broken down, the pullback is a position to bet on a rebound. I plan to place limit orders on OKX, buying long in batches from 2408 to 2422, with a stop loss at 2384, first take profit at 2452, and second take profit at 2488. If it directly breaks above 2472 with volume, I will continue holding; if it breaks below 2384, I will exit immediately without holding. $ETH #三星股东回报落地,最高约800亿美元 @OKX星球 BTC's rebound from 64,000 this round with a peak challenge to 79,600 is a multi-condition resonance pattern, broken down into three parts: direct drivers, catalysts, and underlying support. 1. Direct pushers: Epic short squeeze (passive short covering) In the early stage, there was a prolonged consolidation, with a large amount of crowded short positions piling up in the futures market. After the price breaks through a key resistance level, a large number of short positions trigger forced liquidation, and closing short positions requires buying, forming a chain of passive buying and violently amplifying the upward trend. In terms of data, the single-day scale of short liquidations across the entire network reached $2.7 billion, which is the most direct driving force behind this rally. ⚠️ Key point: Short squeezes are a short-term force. After short positions are cleared, new funds are needed to take over; otherwise, the market may cool down. 2. Catalyst: Macro + regulatory news concentrated (1) The US Treasury is expanding long-term bond buybacks, long-term Treasury yields have fallen, the dollar has weakened, risk asset pressure has eased, and the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like BTC has decreased. (2) U.S. regulatory expectations have warmed, policy statements supporting crypto legislation, and market repricing of compliance and ETF narratives has ignited bullish sentiment. Coins like $ZEC have also surged independently on ETF expectations. 3. Underlying support: Spot funds are positioning ahead of time. Before the rally, some whales and institutions were already accumulating shares at low levels near 60,000. BTC spot ETFs have seen intermittent large net inflows, providing spot buying positions; However, there has been no continuous steady state of explosive inflows; incremental funds are insufficient, and the market is more focused on stock speculation. Bitcoin keeps climbing, but this rally isn’t following the usual script. 👀 Many investors waited for a deeper dip, missed the first move, then watched the next leg higher. Now billions in sidelined capital are still waiting for an entry. That could be why BTC is consolidating near the highs instead of dropping back into the low $70Ks or high $60Ks. The longer price holds, the stronger the FOMO can become. 🧐 #BTCETFInflowsSurge #ETHTests2500 #NvidiaServerPriceHike $ETH has rebounded with incredible strength, once again proving its resilience. It now looks like Ethereum might be gearing up to hit new highs tonight. Let's first talk about the core drivers behind this round of volatility: First, policy news continues to disrupt the market. Trump publicly called on Congress to quickly pass the Clarity Act regulatory bill. The market expects the US crypto regulatory framework to become clearer, which is beneficial for institutional capital inflows in the long term. This positive sentiment has repeatedly caused price fluctuations. However, the bill is still at the proposal stage, and there is a long congressional voting process before it can be finalized. The positive impact is highly uncertain, and it is easy to see price spikes followed by pullbacks before and after the news is realized. Second, ETF funds continue to flow in. Recently, US spot ETFs have seen large capital inflows. Bitcoin ETFs attracted nearly $2 billion in a single week. Institutions like BlackRock have simultaneously increased their holdings in BTC and ETH. Many institutions have further increased their Ethereum holdings proportion. Spot buying supports the price, and there is buying power to absorb declines. Therefore, after the sharp drop in the afternoon, the price did not continue to fall deeply and quickly rebounded. Third, leveraged contract funds are fiercely competing. A large number of short positions had accumulated earlier. The short-term drop triggered some stop-losses, and then the price reversal forced shorts to be liquidated. The back-and-forth clearing between longs and shorts directly amplified short-term volatility. The rebound strength of ETH is clearly stronger than BTC, and institutional funds have recently been increasing their allocation to Ethereum. $BTC This surge is essentially a liquidity squeeze, not a bull market signal BTC consolidated between $62,000 and $67,000 for nearly three weeks, with the decline in long-term U.S. Treasury yields as the trigger—dollar weakness improved liquidity expectations, causing funds to rapidly flow into the crypto market. Ultimately, over $4.3 billion in short positions were collectively liquidated, pushing BTC from $60,000 straight up to $79,800, a roughly 33% increase in one week. However, behind this sharp rise is a clear "liquidation bill"—short covering and leverage-driven momentum were the main components, rather than a systemic entry of new capital. The price was "squeezed" up, not "bought" up. A true trend reversal requires sufficient chip turnover and sustained fundamental improvement to confirm; relying solely on gains built from liquidations raises doubts about sustainability. After the short-term euphoria, the market still faces profit-taking pressure. Whether BTC can complete sufficient turnover in the $77,000-$80,000 range will determine if the next phase is a continued breakout or a pullback to around $75,000 to solidify support. Avoid chasing the sharp rise; waiting for a pullback confirmation before making a decision is more prudent than impulsive entry. #BTC冲高后震荡,ETF资金持续流入 Major update on US-Iran dynamics on August 23: Munir's visit to Iran may handle multiple issues, and Iran's invitation to join the "Mecca Collective Defense Agreement" could change the Middle East landscape! There isn't much news about the US and Iran today, but all are important. Let's review them in chronological order. I believe this marks a major turning point in the US-Iran situation: #特朗普披露千笔证券交易,透明度受关注 1. Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi stated that the so-called "the most severe economic sanctions in history" imposed by the US on Iran are a helpless choice after the failure of existing strategies. At the same time, Iran has not closed the door to negotiation talks and hopes Washington will conduct negotiations respectfully. This is actually a signal to the outside world—Iran does not accept submissive negotiations, only negotiations under respectful conditions. 2. Pakistani Army Marshal Munir will visit Tehran before next Monday. Munir is Pakistan's top representative in US-Iran negotiation mediation. His visit to Tehran means Pakistan will return to being a key player in US-Iran mediation. I believe Munir's visit to Tehran involves three issues: a. Mediation between the US and Iran, which is the main task; b. Jointly discussing strategies to respond to US economic sanctions, and also diplomatically pressuring the US to temporarily suspend economic sanctions; c. Discussing with Iran the related matters of joining the "Mecca Collective Defense Agreement." 3. Senior Iranian officials stated that Iran has been invited to join the "Mecca Collective Defense Agreement," a regional security framework agreement among Middle Eastern countries. The main current members are Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan. Once Iran joins, Iran and Saudi Arabia🔥OKB is stuck between 100–120, it's not that there's no support, but this area happens to be the "graveyard zone" since 2025 On 8/23, OKB hovered around $106–108, with a market cap of about $2.28 billion, total supply of 21 million, and daily RSI above 70. This is no longer the "news-driven surge" like on 8/13. Now the debate is: is this wave the second push forward, or just high-level rotation after the positive news has been priced in? Looking at the chip distribution makes it clearer: $70–85: The largest accumulation zone since 2026, a very solid short-term bottom; $100–120: The most important historical heavy lock-in zone since 2025 — currently stuck repeatedly grinding at this level; $120–170: Very sparse chips above; once volume picks up and it holds above 120, selling pressure will quickly drop, and the vacuum zone directly targets previous highs at 142–229. In other words, OKB doesn’t lack a story now; the story has completed one cycle (21 million hard cap, X Layer as the only Gas, Exchange OS staking threshold). The market is waiting for new money to take over rather than new narratives. Futures open interest and trading volume are rising together, indicating big players are holding, but it also means heavier leverage. If it can’t break through 120, a crash back to 85–95 is likely; conversely, if X Layer opens Exchange OS market deployment in Q3 and launches one or two real traffic applications, 120 won’t be the ceiling. $OKB Yesterday, the crypto market suddenly plunged down right after a sharp rally, catching the bulls off guard. BTC dropped from nearly 80,000 to 76,500 within minutes, wiping out 108 billion across the entire market in 6 minutes. XRP was even more extreme, flashing a crash of over 30% in some periods. Many who just called for a bull run got liquidated, and some in the community lamented that many coins were opened at the starting point, and one sudden spike wiped them all out. Naturally, everyone is concerned about the reasons and what will happen next. After reviewing current discussions, here are several mainstream views: 1. Classic leverage cascade liquidation, short-term trap During the rise on the 19th-20th, 92% of liquidations were shorts, with over $1 billion liquidated in one hour. The surge was too strong, and after funding rates rose, many saw shorts getting liquidated and rushed in to go long. Then, with weekend liquidity thin, a slight pullback triggered a chain liquidation. In the past 12 hours, it reversed: 82% of liquidations were longs, with longs liquidated for $659 million and shorts only $148 million. A detail is that if futures open interest is calculated by BTC quantity, it actually dropped from 532,000 to 465,000 during the rise. This means many were not crazily adding leverage to chase the rally but were reducing positions while prices rose. There aren’t that many people piling on high leverage, but the remaining positions are very concentrated and fragile. Once liquidation starts, it easily cascades. Additionally, during liquidations, market makers directly withdrew orders, causing the bid-ask spread on altcoin perpetuals to jump from the usual 2-3 basis points to over 20, making it impossible to escape; slippage eats you up. The largest single liquidation happened on Hyperliquid, where a single BTC position liquidated nearly $25 million. 2. Market maker hunting conspiracy On-chain data shows market maker Wintermute transferred about 3,834 BTC (~$257 million) to Binance this Monday, with another transfer of about 591 BTC before and after the spike. Some suspect that market makers first pushed spot into exchanges, then when contract longs started cascading liquidations, they dumped spot to accelerate the drop, wiping out the high-leverage longs chasing the top. This "wait for liquidation to start, then dump spot to push it further" tactic was also mentioned during the big flash crash in October 2025. However, although this transfer data and timing match, market makers sending coins to exchanges is common (for market making, arbitrage, client withdrawals), so this remains suspicion without solid proof. 3. Double liquidation is healthier, no worries about spot Both sides’ leverage got cleaned out, making the market cleaner. The main catalysts lifting BTC this round remain US Treasury repos, liquidity expectations, and clearer US crypto policies. Everything is stable and improving, just washing out the high-leverage players. So this view focuses on whether the US Bitcoin ETF will continue to see positive inflows on Monday. As long as fundamentals hold, spot holders need not worry. Overall, the first view seems more convincing. The quoted post below explains it in more detail.ETF inflows last week: BTC was $1.92 billion, ETH was $700 million. Currently, ETH's total market cap is 18.8% of BTC's, while ETF inflows are 36.4% of BTC's. The inflows are double the total market cap, which explains why ETH's largest gain this round is 35.9%, greater than BTC's largest gain of 26.6%. To emphasize again, Trump is strongly embracing blockchain, and after the "Clear Act" passes, U.S. financial assets (USD, U.S. stocks, U.S. bonds, etc.) will be massively put on-chain, tokenized, and smart contracted, which will bring tremendous global financial freedom. If you are someone in the U.S. financial sector, and you see RWA assets massively going on-chain, wouldn't you want to learn what this "chain" is? Wouldn't you want to invest in this "chain"? : ) $NVDA isn’t only selling GPUs to hyperscalers anymore. It’s building another route into the AI infrastructure market. By supporting neocloud players like $CRWV and $NBIS with capital, capacity and early access to new architectures, Nvidia gets more distribution for its hardware while these providers bring its compute directly to AI customers. The trade-off is clear: more ecosystem exposure and capacity risk for Nvidia. But the strategic upside is also clear. $AMZN , $MSFT and $GOOGL are all inAfter the mid-year report disclosure, an intraday drop of nearly 9%, coinciding with the maximum HKD 5 billion buyback plan, $POPMART has hit the brakes on its expansion pace. The 7.5% decline in main IP revenue and a 16.5% drop in the Americas market directly impacted high growth expectations, quickly driving short-term selling pressure amid risk-off sentiment in the market. A 47.3% revenue increase in the mainland market and nearly sixfold growth of the Star People IP have internally built new support, helping to uphold the valuation floor alongside expectations of a large buyback. The risk appetite contraction caused by inventory destocking in external regions temporarily outweighs the fundamental support from local member repurchases and multi-IP tier volume growth. If buyback funds accelerate entry and new IPs like Star People continue to share revenue pressure, the market’s pessimistic pricing on overseas adjustments will gradually be repaired, driving a return of long positions. If the overseas supply chain optimization cycle lengthens, further pressuring profit margins, defensive capital tendencies will suppress the valuation midpoint, and the rebound momentum from the buyback will be weakened. When the buyback implementation pace significantly lags behind the inventory destocking cycle, the current valuation balance maintained by capital support will be directly broken. The most important variables to watch in the coming days are the actual initial buyback amount executed by management and the willingness of Hong Kong Stock Connect funds to support it. #英伟达AI服务器或涨价超15% #财报观察员:泡泡玛特增长换挡,多IP能否接力?BTC relative strength determines the overall market direction, and derivative positions verify that strength. Is the current price movement due to spot demand, or is it a reflexive move emerging from already accumulated derivative risk? The original text conveys the practical priority of waiting for volatility while holding large coins and responding to individual altcoin stocks. The key point is not to chase individual coin movements until BTC decides its direction. BCH, ZEC, XRP, NEIRO, PEPE, and others fluctuated first, but this is closer to a liquidity game by individual stocks rather than overall market risk appetite. The original text does not directly mention which side derivative position risk is concentrated on in this phase, but the attitude of "already holding BTC and waiting for volatility" itself reveals the difference in expectations between spot holders and derivative players. Looking at the market structure, currently, BTC is sideways while some altcoins move individually. This is not a spread of risk appetite, but derivativesAltcoins OI is about to surpass $BTC Bitcoin OI. Last 2 times this happened, most alts formed a local top. Will this time be different?🔥 ZEC above $830 isn’t just a privacy-coin comeback. There’s a much bigger liquidity story underneath. The real catalyst may be Grayscale’s structure. The trust spent the quarter bleeding premiums, but moving toward a spot ETF changes the game. Instead of trading through a closed-end fund wrapper, authorized participants can create and redeem shares against the actual ZEC. That means more direct liquidity, tighter price discovery, and potentially much stronger demand. #DailyOrbit Dòng tiền tiếp theo có thể không chảy vào nơi mọi người đang nhìn Thị trường crypto đang bước vào giai đoạn phân hóa mạnh. Câu hỏi quan trọng không còn là “coin nào sẽ tăng tiếp?”, mà là dòng tiền đang thực sự cam kết với hệ sinh thái nào? BTC / ETH: Dòng tiền tổ chức và ETF vẫn là nền tảng của thị trường. Tuy nhiên, đòn bẩy cao và các đợt thanh lý cho thấy biến động ngắn hạn vẫn rất lớn. L1: Ethereum, Solana và Sui tiếp tục đáng chú ý. Nhưng thay vì chỉ nhìn narrative, cần theo dõi người dùng, $POPMART POPMART 2026 Mid-Year Report: More Opportunities Than Challenges? Revenue for the first half of the year reached ¥17.17 billion, up 23.8% year-over-year; adjusted net profit was ¥5.16 billion, up 9.5% year-over-year. Profit growth has clearly slowed, and management frankly admits it is highly likely to meet the initial 20% revenue target for the year, designating this year as a year of operational adjustment. Opportunities: 1. Domestic foundation is solid, with mainland revenue soaring 47.3%. Membership has surpassed 100 million, with members contributing 92.9% of sales and a repurchase rate of 51.6%. Store strategy has shifted to efficiency improvement rather than blind expansion. 2. Progress in transforming the IP matrix: LABUBU revenue declined by 7.5%, while Star People surged 580.6% to become the second largest IP. Six IPs exceeded ¥1 billion in half-year revenue, reducing reliance on a single blockbuster. 3. Cash flow is ample, with zero interest-bearing debt. A HKD 2–5 billion share buyback was launched, signaling management confidence; Duan Yongping also favors the company’s long-term fundamental value. Existing Challenges: Revenue in Asia-Pacific and the Americas declined by 9.7% and 16.5% respectively. Overseas markets are experiencing growing pains from declining traffic dividends, inventory, and supply chain optimization. Whether the popularity of Star People can be sustained long-term and the slight decline in gross margin require ongoing observation. Overall, the current phase is an active adjustment cycle. Short-term pain is laying a solid foundation for the long term. Going forward, key focus areas include overseas recovery, sustainability of new IPs, and progress on the buyback implementation. Opening various market communities, the overwhelming sound everywhere is "The bull is coming." The comment sections are flooded, short videos repeatedly hype it up, and everywhere is proclaiming that the big bull market has started, as if just entering the market will double your assets. Everyone is swept up in this enthusiastic atmosphere, filled with anticipation. After experiencing a long period of decline and bottoming out, many have been stuck for a long time, with accounts lingering in loss for an extended period, desperately hoping for a booming market to fully recover previous losses. So when they see a few bullish candlesticks on the chart and hear various influencers shout "bull market," their inner hope is instantly ignited, unable to resist fantasizing about a continuous one-way rise ahead. But reality is harsh. This surge came hastily, with a very limited increase and a pitifully short duration. Before the market could fully develop and before most people could earn decent profits, the rise abruptly stopped. After a slight push upward, selling pressure immediately followed, the market began to oscillate repeatedly, pulling up and down, and the newly kindled hope was gradually worn away. Many were blinded by the slogan "The bull is coming," rushing to heavily invest at the slightest rebound, fearing missing the so-called bull market start. They thought this was the beginning of a trend reversal, eagerly expecting a sustained rally afterward, only to realize after entering that this was merely a rebound repair, not the start of a true bull market. In the short term, it was just a pulse caused by concentrated short-covering, not a continuous influx of large new funds. A bull market is never shouted into existence; it is built step by step through real market movements.