Orbit Post Sitemap
#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus This week, everyone has been saying that ETH outflows are even greater than BTC's. I broke down Farside's table by fund, and the Ethereum spot ETF saw $320 million outflows in one week, with BlackRock's ETHA alone accounting for $299 million.
At first, I thought multiple issuers were pulling out together. But after checking, it doesn't add up. ETHA had outflows on four out of five trading days, while Fidelity's FETH actually had net inflows that same week.
Looking further back, from October 2nd to now, over 11 trading days, ETHA only had no movement on the 13th; every other day saw outflows, totaling nearly $800 million.
So the saying "institutions are withdrawing" applies here mainly to one product being redeemed. If next week Fidelity and others also start pulling out consecutively, I'll admit I was wrong.
#机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？
$ETH
$BTC A $60 billion low-pressure center has formed over Silicon Valley, with a clear eye and the outer circulation still expanding outward—this is not rainfall, but a suction process that is vacuuming the entire computing power sky.
Let's first look at the live observation. Quarterly revenue is $16.8 billion, a quarter-on-quarter increase of about 45%, with adjusted books turning positive. This is a signal of stratification stability finally appearing after continuous strong convection: vertical wind shear is weakening, indicating that the cloud cluster itself now has self-sustaining ability and no longer relies on temporary heating from the warm pool. However, during the same period, some investors have lowered the listing valuation expectation from 2 trillion to 1.5 trillion. Please note the forecast wording—this is a downgrade in intensity forecast, not a cancellation of the path forecast. A typhoon being downgraded one level before landfall does not mean it won't come; it only means the damage radius is contracting and the landfall window is delayed.
The real variable lies in the condensation height. A certain fund plans to enter with $9 billion and a 10% coupon; once this contour line is drawn, the condensation height is pushed to a rarely seen position in recent years: water vapor must rise very high to condense into rain, and the financing cost is that unavoidable climbing distance. Computing power expenditure is evaporation, revenue and cash flow are precipitation, and the difference can only be replenished by continuous water vapor supply. When evaporation exceeds precipitation for a long time, the cloud base will rise higher and higher, and what eventually falls is not heavy rain but dry thunderstorms—loud thunder but no wet ground, and the rain gauge shows nothing. This also explains why there is profit on the books while the barometer continues to fall.
Next, look at airspace control. The audit department requires safety governance to be implemented first, and the legislative draft has been submitted to lawmakers; this is akin to airworthiness certification and airspace approval before takeoff. The control tower does not show a green light, so flights can only queue at the runway entrance; queuing burns fuel, burning fuel consumes the valuation window. The downstream front can already feel the lagging precipitation—Dell-related targets are at the lower edge of the water vapor convergence zone; the wind has not arrived yet, but the pressure is moving first, and the trading volume resembles gust curves on a wind measurement tower, intermittent and unsustained #anthropic60bfinancing$BTC at the $80K Crossroads: ETF Outflows vs. Whale Accumulation 🐋
Despite hotter-than-expected CPI/PPI data and $500M+ in October ETF outflows, Bitcoin continues to violently defend the $80,000–$81,500 range.
Here is why this zone is holding strong:
* The Institutional Magnet: The average US spot ETF cost basis sits right at $81,500–$82,300, triggering heavy defensive buying to prevent institutional unrealized losses.
Whale Accumulation: While retail and ETFs show caution, on-chain data s #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？
USDC's circulating supply continues to expand, and Circle's revenue is largely tied to stablecoin holdings; however, it should also be recognized that "stablecoin growth" is a mid-to-long-term story and does not necessarily mean that the earnings report will be positive for the stock price/token.🌙 On Saturday night, Xiaomi defied the trend with consecutive gains, TRUMP stuck at 1.86, BNB sideways at 730
$XIAOMI 3.461, rising against the trend from 3.32 to 3.46 over three days 📱 Moving opposite to the broader market is its most notable feature this round. Bitcoin volume shrank over the weekend, while Xiaomi kept climbing for three days straight. As a consumer electronics stock, Xiaomi has been picked out by capital as a safe-haven allocation. It doesn’t follow the crypto beta; this trend is more closely tied to Hong Kong stocks and Apple’s supply chain sentiment. Next, we’ll see if Apple’s earnings report can provide momentum for the sector.
$TRUMP stuck at 1.86, neither up nor down 🎭
After retreating from 1.9 to 1.86, it’s nailed there with no selling pressure pushing it down, nor buying pressure lifting it up—very flat sideways movement. Compared to meme coins like DOGE and BOME, which have been falling these past two days, TRUMP is actually the most stable. The reason is that the trapped positions are above 1.9, so selling pressure at the current price is light, but no new money is coming in either. Political meme coins usually need an external event to break this sideways pattern.
$BNB 730.8, diverging from OKB 🔶
OKB dropped from 124 to 117 on Friday, while BNB only moved sideways around 730, up 0.25 points. Among platform tokens, BNB is clearly more stable. Binance’s ecosystem has a large circulating supply, so short-term capital flows have less impact on price, unlike OKB which is more easily driven by sentiment waves. Without catalysts over the weekend, it just stays quiet.
This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice.
#AppleNewCEOReceivesFirstiPhone18ReportCardOvernight, U.S. tech stocks faced a fierce sell-off, with the Nasdaq plunging 2.15%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index has fallen for eight consecutive trading days, marking the longest losing streak in years. U.S. Treasury yields rose, and market risk appetite clearly cooled. Nvidia, AMD, and memory chip stocks all declined collectively, while crypto concept stock COIN followed the broader market down as funds began withdrawing from high-risk thematic assets.
On the crypto side, PUMP sharply plunged today, with the 24-hour decline widening. The core selling pressure came from large whales unloading tokens en masse after unlocks, with big sell orders causing significant slippage. Although project teams once used platform revenue for buybacks, they couldn’t fully counter the ongoing unlock-driven selling pressure. Platform meme coin minting activity continued to decline, and traffic waned. Meme sector funds are inherently fragile; once the broader market weakens, these small-cap coins are the first to be abandoned by investors.
ZEC is also under pressure, with bearish logic continuing to develop:
1. The hype around privacy narratives has cooled; the vast majority of transactions still use transparent addresses, and actual privacy usage doesn’t keep pace with market cap.
2. Regulatory risks loom large, with overseas exchanges tightening controls on privacy coins, creating significant liquidity risks.
3. Token concentration means that if institutional funds choose to exit, the lack of support can lead to cliff-like price drops.
4. With declining risk appetite in the broader market, funds prioritize fleeing highly volatile niche coins.
The tech sell-off in U.S. stocks is dragging risk assets down across the board. Does this sharp drop in PUMP signal a phase-end for the meme theme?ETF has withdrawn another 82.4 million, yet the market hasn't collapsed—BTC is still holding above 81,500, tonight's scenario is quite interesting📊.
I'll start with ETH, which had the cleanest rebound: it dropped to a low of 2,393 during the day, then recovered to 2,429, not a big fluctuation, half the losses have been regained.
SOL followed suit: 102.49 didn't break, bounced back to 104.3, the low wick indicates someone was buying.
BTC is the most stable: a day trip to 80,809, then recovered to 81,512, the 81,000 barrier is holding for now.
Why isn't it falling? Two big risks have gone silent: the Fed entered a blackout period today, Warsh said nothing about monetary policy in Bangkok, the October rate hike bet dropped from 27.7% to 12.7%; the MSCI removal list will be finalized on November 11, the boot is hanging, but it didn't drop tonight. The selling is from panic players with clear signals—the marginal selling pressure is fading.
And the most important point, weekends usually have little market action, maybe crypto folks resonate with not playing competitive games on weekends.
Here’s my trading reference for tonight’s openers:
① ETH’s 2,393 is the support, lightly go long above 2,429, if it breaks 2,400, cut losses and exit;
② BTC holding above 81,500, watch for a rebound between 82,000 and 82,500, don’t chase shorts;
③ SOL follows around 104, reduce positions on a rebound above 105, don’t overreach.
The rate hike risk has fizzled out, the ETF withdrawals are the last batch of obvious panic selling—bears, don’t add positions tonight, beware of a sharp reversal paying back💸.$ZEC fulfilled my expectations; no rush to bottom-fish yet. Data shows that during a certain drop, the liquidation amount of ZEC long positions within 24 hours reached as high as $17.9 million to $20 million, accounting for 88.7% of the total forced liquidations. Long positions exceeding $10 million were liquidated during the sell-off, further intensifying the downward momentum. Research firm CoinShares clearly pointed out that this round of decline "is not about Zcash's fundamentals," but essentially a concentrated liquidation of leveraged positions.
After the price broke below key moving averages, technical selling further emerged. For example, ZEC once broke below the 200-period EMA on the 4-hour chart (around $1282), which then turned into resistance. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) also dropped to a weak area at 41.75, reinforcing the short-term bearish structure.
From a 4-hour perspective, there are short-term long opportunities for light entry; around 1600 can be partially exited in batches, and consider adding to long positions after breaking through 1690, targeting new levels at 1700 or even higher.
The decline of ZEC is a "technical crash" triggered by ultra-high leverage, not a fundamental collapse. Its long-term logic such as privacy narrative and quantum-resistant roadmap has not been completely destroyed, but the short-term price structure has been severely damaged and needs time to rebuild leverage and confidence.$SNDK perpetual 75x short position, opened at 1368.8, currently at 1299.4, floating profit +380.26%.
The idea is very simple: the top consolidates with volume shrinking to the extreme, volatility compressed to the floor, indicating the bullish momentum is exhausted. A single high-volume bearish candle smashed the price down from 1368.8, a typical breakdown signal, short rather than long. 75x leverage, stop loss at 1400. The trend goes straight down, giving no comfortable exit point, profits take off immediately.
At this position, I plan to take half the position off the table first, and move the stop loss of the remaining half to 1320 to let profits run. If 1250 breaks down with volume, continue holding; if it can't fall further, close all positions. $ETH $BTC #特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #美国暂缓对俄制裁，柴油供应预期生变 $CL
The first batch of 300,000 tons of diesel is equivalent to about 2.24 million barrels, while the US consumes about 4 million barrels per day.
▪️ On 10/9, the US Treasury Department issued a license relaxing sanctions on Russian diesel trade
▪️ Authorization valid until April 7, 2027
▪️ US reported quantities: first 300,000 tons, then 500,000 tons in November, followed by 1 million tons
▪️ Additionally, a verbal figure of "another 3 million barrels depending on refinery conditions"
▪️ 300,000 tons calculated at about 7.45 barrels per ton, approximately 2.24 million barrels
▪️ On 10/12, the EU approved 1,569 sanctions against Russia, involving 743 individuals and 826 entities
▪️ On 10/16, WTI closed at $101.41, back above 100
The disagreement is not about whether to relax sanctions, but about the duration controlled by the announcement and the volume controlled by the pricing.
The license is a time window, the volume is a batch of physical goods; they are not on the same dimension. The US is allowing "sales to the US," while the EU is tightening insurance and shipping; a batch of goods must pass through both. The part that can be realized is determined by the narrowest constraint.
The direction is to wait and see — supply improvement is only confirmed when port arrivals rise for two consecutive months; with only the license, prices still reflect expectations.Today's Position Daily Report
On-chain signals: Glassnode reported that yesterday's decline showed another "seller capitulation." Comparing early August, mid-August, and mid-September, loss-driven sell-offs often occurred near local lows. After the September peak, profit-taking has slowed down; if the selling pressure above 80,000 USD continues this pattern, the probability of a phase bottom increases.
Capital flow: Enterprises have increased holdings by about 193,000 BTC this year, ETFs have cumulatively accumulated over 57 billion USD, and institutional base positions remain firm. The contrast between on-chain panic selling and institutional absorption looks more like a shakeout rather than a trend reversal.
Market observation: The 80,000 USD level sees intense battle between bulls and bears, with the mid-term logic of supply-demand imbalance unchanged. If the bottom consolidates, there is still room for a main upward wave.
Position conclusion: Short-term fluctuations are inevitable, mid-term positions should not be exited lightly; pay attention to the effectiveness of the 80,000 support, hold the base positions firmly, and avoid being shaken out.
Topics: $BTC $ZEC $ETH #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ Inflation data remains high, yet the market is rebounding. Is this rally a sentiment recovery or a bull trap?
Both the US September PPI and CPI exceeded expectations, showing hotter inflation data. However, Federal Reserve officials spoke cautiously without signaling a clear rate hike, causing the market to sharply lower the probability of an October hike to 15%. The data is hot, officials are dovish, and the market rallied first.
In my view, this is just an emotional release within a volatile market, not a trend reversal.
With easing rate hike expectations, the dollar and US Treasury yields have fallen back, and risk assets have briefly warmed up. BTC is currently oscillating around 82,500, with strong resistance at 83,000–84,000 and short-term support at 81,500–82,000. An upward move must break out with volume to be valid; if officials release hawkish remarks, prices can easily fall back.
The premise for a stronger market: no further hot inflation data and continued market sentiment recovery.
Key risk: the root of inflation is not eliminated, and rate hikes remain possible within the year. In this scenario, bulls are vulnerable to sudden hawkish statements.
Regarding altcoins, taking ZEC as an example, it has rebounded with the market but faces clear resistance above, with the head and shoulders pattern intact. The 1260-1300 range is suitable for reducing positions; it looks lively but actual buying strength is questionable.
Many overlook one point: the market is currently trading on officials’ dovish rhetoric, not on actual inflation decline. Officials’ stance can reverse at any time; inflation decline is the foundation of a major trend.
At this stage, do not treat this rebound as the start of a new market cycle. 🧾 First, the 6 o'clock account: ETF is still down by 10.6 million, and the 4h cut was 70.2% of ETH short positions.
The gate hasn't opened, 84,500 is not discussed; 79,775 is still hanging, current price difference is 2.2%.
What really should be watched tonight is not the 0.6% drop, but the 34% decrease in daily trading volume.
The consensus is "another shakeout." But a shakeout requires liquidations, and tonight liquidations are shrinking.
24h liquidations are 272 million, down 15%. In one hour, the whole market only liquidated a few million; I checked three times thinking it hadn't refreshed.
The largest single liquidation is STRK's 2.57 million, with longs accounting for 99.6%—not enough to support a shakeout.
This is the weekend market: no ETF subscriptions, US stocks closed, market makers withdrawing orders.
In a thin market, a slightly larger order can cause a deep spike, but after the spike, no one follows.
Weekend breakouts are mostly others testing depth using your stop-loss orders.
What can prove it wrong: by next Monday 08:00, if the breakout below 79,775 has less than 10 million liquidations in 1 hour, it's a false breakout, recovering to 80,500 within 24h;
If the breakout has over 20 million liquidations in 1 hour, it's a real breakout, next stop 78,200.
Focus on one thing: in the first hour after Monday's open, can the trading volume return to 150 billion.
If it can't, don't make decisions based on weekend spikes.
Is it no one catching, or holding back a big move?
(Not financial advice)
$BTC #InstitutionalFundsContinuouslyOutflow, can BTC stabilize?#奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 Betting on a low-probability event 948 million, 90% are long positions — this week we went through a liquidation cascade. Leveraged longs dropped below the maintenance margin line, and the exchange liquidated positions immediately without waiting for margin top-ups. The liquidations pushed the price down another notch, triggering the next batch. This kind of drop has nothing to do with fundamentals, it’s all about how crowded the positions are.
We experienced this this week. On Thursday, the entire network’s contracts liquidated $948 million, 90.6% of which were longs; today it eased to $315 million.
90% longs means this move has little to do with whether BTC is valuable or not, it’s just that the longs were too crowded, one after another getting wiped out. The liquidations happen fast but are fragile; without spot buyers stepping in, the market is even thinner.
BTC is now around 81,300, with an intraday low of 79,700 and a high of 84,400. 80,000 held as support, with strong resistance between 82,000 and 84,000. ETH is grinding between 2,350 and 2,420, ZEC was pushed down from 1,200 to 1,090.
This week, spot ETFs saw a net outflow of 409 million, down from 819 million last week, halving the outflow. But outflow doesn’t mean a switch to buying, so don’t rush to interpret this as bullish.
I haven’t fully figured it out myself: the waterfall decline is slowing, selling pressure is retreating, both pointing to the drop being mostly done; but 80,000 is just holding, not firmly established. My judgment is a halt in the decline, not a reversal. Liquidity is thin over the weekend, so don’t heavily bet on direction.
(Personal observation, not investment advice. Manage your positions well.) #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 Advertising business becomes a new highlight The financial report needs to approach a 3% main business growth rate to meet expectations Those betting yes are all people who don't analyze #OKX美股財報季 #OKX達人 #交易TradFi就來OKX
OKX Outcomes has also caught up with the US stock earnings season in Q3, and this time it's not just focusing on the crypto market, but has added a new direction worth studying. Recently participated a bit in $BTC BTC not dropping below 10% doesn’t mean it’s resistant to decline
Global assets are falling together, $BTC’s drop hasn’t reached 10%.
Short-term traders focus on this line, thinking it has held up.
How this number is calculated:
The drop of less than 10% is compared to other assets.
Others have fallen harder, so it appears stable.
It’s not that it hasn’t dropped, but the reference assets are worse.
The moment it triggers:
On the real day of bottoming out, the first thing to move isn’t the price.
It’s the order book. Once the buy orders withdraw, 100,000 is just empty talk.
Taking it a step further, it’s easy to label it as resistant to decline, but one bearish candle can tear that label off.
Short-term traders watch who breaks first, not who falls less.
A small drop just means it’s not its turn yet.
#机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？
#$BTC On October 15, the U.S. stock market showed a "gap down then recovery" pattern: after an initial gap down, the market gradually rose towards the close. QQQ closed down 0.13% (728.00), SPY rose about 0.28% (771.79), and the long-term bond ETF TLT surged 1.37%. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield fell back to 5.10% (down about 9 basis points that day), with the 20-year and 30-year yields also moving down in sync. The market's probability of a Fed rate hike in October declined.
The main pressures came from two aspects: first, the progress in DRAM technology by China's Changxin Memory, which created competitive expectations for memory sectors like Micron; second, concerns over data center debt and financing costs (such as CoreWeave's high debt structure). CPI expectations also intensified short-term volatility, with market sentiment remaining cautious.
Core judgment: overall still within a bull market framework, but short-term may experience dull fluctuations. Wave theory suggests a short-term bottom may form around October 24 (actual October 24 is a Saturday, so focus on Friday the 23rd to Monday the 26th). The next major catalyst is the U.S. midterm elections on November 3, expected to be roughly split between Republicans and Democrats, with no quick clarity but overall leaning positive.
Operational advice: the market is "conserving strength and taking a break," selectively focusing on high-volatility, small-cap stocks such as OPEN (important support around $1.73, surged 16.58% that day, with changes including a former Shopify COO becoming CEO) and HYMC (up 6.58% that day). These stocks have high elasticity but require individual verification of fundamentals, liquidity, and short interest data. The key context is that analysts expect revenue of about $12.87 billion, almost in line with Netflix's guidance. That means simply meeting expectations may not be enough to drive a strong rally. Advertising growth and future guidance will also matter.
So I would say NO!
#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins 【Tom Lee is calling to buy the dip again, but the problem is the money hasn't come back yet】
Tom Lee said that cryptocurrencies, chip stocks, and AI cloud companies have all returned to support levels. As long as the fundamentals aren't broken, a rebound could be imminent. This makes sense; buying after a drop is obviously cheaper than chasing at a high, but "dropping to support levels" doesn't mean buying interest is ready.
As of October 16, the US spot $BTC ETF saw a net outflow of about $228 million over the week, and the $ETH ETF had a net outflow of about $320 million, with ETH being redeemed for three consecutive days.
On the same side, tech stocks faced sell-offs, with CoreWeave $CRWV down about 25% in a week, bringing debt and AI infrastructure return issues to the forefront.
I don't deny there might be a rebound here, but Tom Lee himself is the BitMine chairman who is long-term bullish on ETH, so his optimistic view shouldn't be taken as a funding signal. Plus, he's called this many times, giving a bit of a "wolf is coming" feeling.
I think we need to first see if the support can hold, then watch if ETF outflows converge. If the price stabilizes and funds flow back, buying the dip has a basis; if support breaks, the so-called "imminent" rebound could actually be a downward launch.This $STRK short position with 50x leverage gained over 300%, actually profiting from the altcoin sentiment downturn.
On the 4-hour chart, it's very clear: from 0.1268 it has been steadily declining, with short and mid-term moving averages all pressing downwards, and the price hasn't had any decent rebound. I opened the short around 0.07099, and the market felt like: after a low-level consolidation, it broke the bottom again, with no support at all, and funds are accelerating their withdrawal.
For these altcoins, technicals aren't the most critical factor; the core is "funds repricing." After such a big drop, profit-taking has long exited, momentum buyers are not entering, and what's left are passive stop-loss orders pushing the price down. It dropped 10% intraday, and the funding rate is still negative, indicating bulls are still holding on hard, but the market no longer supports them.
The current mark price is 0.0666, with the previous low at 0.06518 right below. I'm holding this position to see if I can trigger another wave of panic selling. But honestly, 50x leverage carries significant risk; if it spikes up again, caution is necessary.$ETC runs ~159 TH/s (Oct 14, Kryptex). During the Aug 2020 attacks, Crypto51 had it near 2 TH/s and a 1-hour attack at about $4,860. That’s 80x more hash.
But pool share isn’t the number that matters. Attackers rented 51%, they didn’t own it. Tracked pools on MiningBoard cover under 40% of ETC hash.
Cost scales with hash times rental price, so the 2020 figure is dead. What I can’t verify is how much Etchash is rentable today.
#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins 🔍 Why does 80,000 seem like a strong support? This market move has brought out the evidence
CPI and PPI are both running hot, and $BTC once dropped to 79,800. Many thought it would break down, but the price didn’t stay long near 80,000 before buyers pushed it back above 81,000, completing a rebound within a few hours. This kind of "drop and catch" is more convincing than just looking at the price level.
I regard the area around 80,000 as a key defensive line, based on three reasons:
1. Macro shows a pause. Warsh has not signaled a clear rate hike, and the probability of a rate hike in October has been revised down to 15%. Although yields remain high, the hawkish stance has not intensified. When macro conditions don’t worsen, this level is easier to defend.
2. Multiple technical overlaps. The uptrend line is around 80,400, and the 50-day moving average is nearby; the average cost of spot ETFs is about 81,500–82,300. If broken, many institutional positions turn to losses, and there have been obvious buy orders on the order book.
3. Capital support. October ETFs are generally net outflows, and institutional buying is weak, but reports show whales are more inclined to accumulate this week, with spot order books showing support orders near 80,000. The price can still be supported when institutions are cautious, indicating other buyers are active.
In terms of trading, I prefer to treat this range as an observation anchor rather than chasing rallies or selling off. Weekend liquidity is thin and prone to spikes. Do you think 80,000 can hold this time?
This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice.
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ BTC holds 80,000, ZEC is bleeding
Bitcoin: 80,000 is the bottom line, but don't rush to call a bull market.
BTC is currently around $81,500, down 0.7% in 24 hours. It briefly fell below 80,000 on Friday but quickly recovered, indicating support at this level. However, the rebound quality is mediocre—ETF funds have not followed.
This week's ETF flows have been like a roller coaster: outflow of 65.4 million on the 12th, inflow of 175.7 million on the 13th, and outflow of 261.4 million on the 14th. Institutions are repeatedly testing, with no consistent direction formed.
A key coordinate: the 20-month moving average is at $87,165, and BTC is testing this long-term trendline from below. Historically, breaking through this level often leads to a new cycle high, but in the short term, it coincides with the 2026 opening price of $87,490, creating heavy selling pressure.
My view: As long as 80,000 holds, BTC is in weak consolidation, not a crash. But until it recovers to 83,000-85,000, don't chase altcoins. Liquidity is thin over the weekend, so don't mistake small rebounds for reversals.
$ZEC: currently trading in the $1,141-1,169 range, down 5-8% in 24 hours, with an intraday drop exceeding 7%. Within four hours, it slid from 1,193 to 1,141, liquidating $350,000 in long positions and only $30,000 in shorts. Leveraged longs are being systematically liquidated.
Technically, 1,229-1,288 is a strong resistance zone; rebounds are rejected here, forming lower highs. Below, 1,080-1,059 is a short-term watch zone; breaking below will deepen the correction. #机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？ If you don't place trend orders soon, you'll miss the opportunity. Don't always think about getting stuck in the last wave of decline. If you can accept a floating loss of about 40% after buying, I've always believed 78,000 will come; the probability is very high, but it also might not come.
In extreme cases, 74,000 might be a wick down. Below 74,000, around 72,000 can be steadily defended. That means your forced liquidation must be below 60,000. This is the healthiest and safest way to trade to prevent black swan events.
If your capital can't support your strong desires, then I hope you be more rational and lower your desires, because you are not yet qualified to have such big desires.
If you are more aggressive, your forced liquidation still cannot be higher than 70,000. Trading is about position management.
Never learn from those who are right next to forced liquidation; they are gamblers, not traders. A gentleman should not stand under a dangerous wall.
Also, don't follow any strategy groups; they are all trying to earn commissions by giving you entry points to make frequent trades, causing you to lose repeatedly. If you open three or four trades back and forth a day, and dozens of people in the group do the same, the group owner can enjoy luxury every day.
Remember, no one cares whether you live or die. You must survive to contribute to the crypto community.
$BTC $ETH $SOL Inflation data is scorching hot, yet the market is throwing a party. Isn't this scene a bit disjointed? Is this lively activity a sign of emotional recovery or a structural bull trap? Watching the market last night gave me a very subtle feeling. The US September PPI year-on-year was 6.3%, and CPI year-on-year was 3.7%, both exceeding expectations. Normally, this would push rate hike bets higher. But in the speech on the 16th, Wash neither predicted future rate decisions nor revealed whether there would be action in October. Daly and Goolsbee were also cautious. As a result, the market directly pushed the probability of a rate hike in October down to 15%. Data is shouting hot, officials are buying time, yet prices rise first as a courtesy. I see this wave more as an emotional release during a volatile phase rather than a trend confirmation. Cooling rate hike expectations gave the dollar and US Treasury yields a breather, risk appetite briefly recovered, BTC hovered around 82,000, with strong resistance from 83,500 to 84,500 and short-term support from 81,500 to 82,000. A breakout with volume is needed to move up effectively; on the downside, just one hawkish comment from officials could cause a pullback. The bullish path lies in: the cooling expectations buy the market a time window, and as long as no hotter data emerges, sentiment can slowly recover. But the risk is obvious—consecutive hot PPI and CPI indicate inflation’s root hasn’t been eliminated, and another rate hike within the year is still on the table. This "hot data, soft statements" combination is most likely to catch bulls who priced in early off guard when officials turn hawkish. The altcoin side is even more obvious. If the market rebounds due to cooling expectations, ZEC might follow, but its upper range from 1.273 to #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点
Everyone needs to pay attention
5 verification signals on the earnings night
1. Whether advertising revenue is ≥ 800 million and the full-year target of 3 billion is revised upward — the core of the bull story, with the highest weight.
2. Whether Q4 revenue/profit margin guidance is revised upward — it was just lowered in July; another cut would directly crash the stock; only an upward revision can reverse expectations.
3. Qualitative comments in the call on churn, US and Canada subscribers, and viewing time — whether they admit engagement has stabilized or continue to vaguely pass it off as "healthy."
4. Whether operating profit margin stabilizes at 33% and provides profit margin direction for 2027.
5. Pricing stance: whether it hints at a new round of price increases, and whether the price increase is accompanied by concerns about rising churn.$SAND surged 13% in a single day! Negative news fully priced in + AI narrative + short squeeze, a triple resonance explosion!
Family, behind this violent rally of SAND, the logic chain is very clear, with three core driving resonances:
1️⃣ Negative news fully priced in, South Korean capital channel reopened 🇰🇷
A cross-chain bridge vulnerability once caused Upbit to issue a long-term investment warning, blocking South Korean institutional funds from entering. On September 8, compensation claims officially opened, with the treasury paying 1:1 in full without issuing new tokens. After Upbit removed the warning, local incremental funds poured in directly.
2️⃣ Narrative upgrade: switching from "Metaverse" to "AI creation" 🤖
Sandbox 3.0 roadmap introduces AI and VibeCoding, and the AI game engine Studio greatly lowers the creation threshold. Coupled with the launch of the mobile NEXT test and the Alpha Season 7 UGC race, the ecosystem's playability is substantially improving.
3️⃣ Short squeeze amplifies the surge ⚡
Open interest once reached 6.4 times the market value, with an extremely crowded short structure. After the positive news landed, shorts were forced to liquidate en masse (about $3.77 million in short liquidations within 24h), and the short squeeze directly amplified the gains.
In summary: Compliance risk cleared + AI narrative shift + derivatives short squeeze, this wave of SAND is a "fundamental + capital" Davis double play. #Meta巨额AI投入进入回报检验期 Maji's outcome reveals more than his position size.
This person is no novice. Rolling from 56,000 to 12.25 million in four months; then from 12.25 million back to 20,000 in one day. After $ETH dropped below 2400 and was liquidated, it wasn't that he misread the direction, he died on leverage. 25x full position, a price move of less than 4% against him is a death sentence, and $ETH fell from 2500 to below 2400 without even a decent rebound.
What’s even more painful is that after his liquidation, the $ETH long-short ratio kept rising. Retail traders’ long-short ratio has surged to 2.33, increasing as the price falls, and the funding rate turned positive—longs are paying shorts, begging them to take their positions. This is not a “2400 iron bottom,” it’s a crowd standing on an iron bottom with empty space beneath.
---
On the macro side, no ladder was handed to the bulls either.
CPI at 3.7%, PPI at 6.3%, both exceeding expectations, the probability of a rate hike in October surged from 17.7% to 29.3%. Although the latest FedWatch dropped back to around 17%, seeming like a “breath of relief,” this decline is not due to cooling inflation but because the market is betting the Fed won’t strike again amid stock market circuit breakers, a 5% drop in the Nikkei, and a 7.5% drop in the KOSPI. The bet is on central bank fear, not data improvement.
$BTC ETFs saw a net outflow of $146 million in the past 7 days, $ETH ETFs a net outflow of $250 million. Prices hover around 81,000 while money flows out. This “price sideways, money out” structure is more tormenting than a direct breakdown—it doesn’t give you a clear stop-loss signal, only lets you bleed slowly in the illusion of “holding the line.”
---
Focus on three key levels.
$BTC 81,000. After briefly dipping below 80,000 on Friday and recovering, it shows support at 80,000, but the rebound quality is poor, and ETFs didn’t follow volume. If 81,000 breaks again and can’t recover, the 80,000 support will be pierced like paper.
$ETH 2,400. Maji fell here, retail traders cluster here, funding rate turns positive here. Same level, same crowd, same story—if 2400 breaks again, it’s not an “iron bottom,” it’s a “stampede line.”
$SOL 100. The liquidation dense zone is between 105 and 100, with 40.61 million long positions liquidated in 24 hours versus only 3 million shorts. The long crowding is evident; once 100 breaks, the chain reaction will be more violent than $BTC and $ETH.
---
The conclusion is simple: it’s not about who’s more accurate, but who survives longer.
Maji bought a lesson with a cumulative loss of $36.68 million—being right on direction doesn’t matter, leverage will take you out first. Retail long-short ratios at 2.33, 2.39, funding rates near zero or positive—translated into plain language: longs aren’t dead yet, leverage hasn’t cleared, bottom-fishers are still lining up as fuel.
Don’t catch flying knives, don’t bet on iron bottoms. Wait for liquidation data to cool down, wait for funding rates to settle near zero again, wait for a low-volume sideways candle to appear, then decide whether to put your finger on the trigger.
Only by surviving do you earn the right to talk about the next round.
---
On-chain data has delays; the above is only a market structure observation and does not constitute trading advice. Leverage is a knife; whichever side you hold, it will cut your hand.
#特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 #MSCI new rules impact treasury stocks, Strategy publicly opposes $MSTR
The rules were finalized on 10/15, and the opposition was issued after the finalization.
▪️ On 10/15 Eastern Time, MSCI finalized new index eligibility rules
▪️ The standard changed from "proportion of digital assets in total assets" to "whether substantive business operations are conducted"
▪️ Applicable from the November index review, effective 12/1
▪️ 14 crypto companies are on the potential impact list, including Strategy, Metaplanet, Upexi
▪️ JPMorgan estimates passive funds may be forced to sell $2.8 billion MSTR
▪️ The company claims it is an entity with software business, treasury is an independent department
▪️ On 10/16 MSTR −7.05%
The disagreement is not about exclusion or not, but whether the new rule changes the proportion or the nature.
Proportion is an adjustable number; buying fewer coins can reduce it; nature is unchangeable and requires proving the existence of business. The former leaves room for those included to operate, the latter only leaves the burden of proof. MSCI is the compiler, not the regulator; changing the method does not require consent from those included.
The direction is to wait and see — the November review list will determine the outcome; issuing a statement without changing disclosure means opposition has no acceptance window.Title: The bulls are being slowly tortured, not cleared out. Don't catch this flying knife.
$BTC 81595, $ETH 2420, $SOL 104. The drop isn't big, but it hurts.
What hurts is not the price, but those still holding contracts. In 24 hours, the whole network liquidated 333 million, with longs liquidated at 222 million: $BTC longs 57.55 million, $ETH longs 36.49 million. The numbers are here, but what really chills me is not how much was liquidated, but that positions remain after liquidation.
News: The most disgusting combination is not bad news, but bad news that has already been priced in without a crash.
US September CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations; PPI rose 1.3% month-on-month, the largest single-month increase since March 2022. Normally, such data would cause risk assets to collapse. But at the IMF annual meeting, Waugh said “no prediction on meeting outcomes,” pushing the October rate hike probability down from over 25% to about 15%.
So you see a very twisted market: inflation data is strong, rate hike expectations softened, yet $BTC can't even touch 84000 again. What does this mean? It means the market is not unafraid of rate hikes, it has no strength left to fear. Bad news landing without a rebound is more dangerous than the bad news itself. On the ETF side, votes are with their feet: on October 16, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw net outflows of 82.39 million, with BlackRock IBIT alone withdrawing 71.78 million; Ethereum ETFs outflowed 69.68 million in the same period. Institutions are exiting, retail is holding on, two lines moving separately.
Market/contract side: Bulls are not “consolidating,” they are being slowly bled out.
Look at the long-short ratio. $BTC at 1.86 is relatively restrained, $ETH 2.33, $SOL 2.39—retail bulls are clearly more crowded on $ETH and $SOL. But look at the funding rates and the truth shows: $ETH rate +0.0044%, annualized 4.8%; $SOL 0.0003%, annualized 0.4%. In plain terms: you hold longs but earn almost no interest, purely relying on the belief that “2400 is a strong bottom” and “100 is a strong bottom.” Faith produces no cash flow, only counterparties.
The most critical signal is in open interest (OI). This week, long liquidations accounted for nearly 80%, $660 million in longs wiped out, but $BTC open interest only dropped 0.14%. So much liquidation but no position reduction means some are liquidated while others enter. Leverage hasn't retreated, just changed hands. This is not “clearing out,” this is torture. Every 100 points down, a batch is cut, then replaced by another batch, then cut again.
81000, 2400, 100—these three levels are not “support,” they are the bulls’ last dignity. Hold them, and the consolidation continues; break them, and those holding on faith will be forced to surrender their chips. A chain stampede needs no reason; OI itself is the reason.
Conclusion in one sentence: stay out of longs.
Don't catch the falling knife, don't bet on the iron bottom. Wait for data to cool down, wait for volume to shrink and stabilize, wait for OI to truly drop and funding rates to go below zero, then talk about entering. Those rushing in to bottom-fish now are likely not hunters, but the next batch hanging on the tree.
#特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 Dear, Netflix $NFLX will release its earnings report after the U.S. market closes on October 20. Moonlight is cautiously optimistic this time!👀
The company expects Q3 revenue of $12.86 billion, a year-on-year increase of about 12%, with an operating margin expected at 33.2%.
Moonlight's forecast is:
Performance close to expectations, profit may slightly exceed, advertising monetization is a key observation point.
However, last year's same period had tax expenses that lowered the profit margiThe whole screen is shouting that the bulls are being killed, but I actually think that the shorts adding positions upwards now are more dangerous.
The direction of the liquidation heatmap is correct; there are indeed more shorts above ETH than bulls below. The bulls' leverage has been washed out once, with open interest shrinking from 20 billion to 15 billion, while shorts are still piling up. To put it plainly, this structure means the shorts are fueling the rebound. But don't take the "546 million" figure too seriously; the heatmap estimates dynamically based on leverage and exchanges, and it varies a lot at different times, so using it to infer the short squeeze scale is unreliable.
I'm watching 2500–2510. This is the first window where short liquidation density starts to rise. If it holds steady, stop-loss orders may trigger a chain reaction; if it keeps testing but doesn't break, the squeeze will be postponed.
Don't over-interpret macro either. CPI at 2.6% exceeded expectations, Brent crude oil surged to 110, and rate hike bets are heating up—these are true, but the market is mostly pricing in "pause then move," not immediate consecutive hikes. The ETF is the same: a single-day outflow of 82.41 million, but the same batch of products previously saw an inflow of 175.7 million. Institutions haven't been continuously supporting the bottom; how far the short squeeze can burn depends on whether spot buying picks up the relay.
The fear index is 25, extreme fear. At this time, just focusing on whether "80,000 breaks or not" isn't very meaningful. Shorts are adding, bulls are reducing, the structure has already changed. 2500–2510 is the first verification window. $BTC $ETH Double surpassing expectations ≠ immediate rate hike? The market breathes a sigh of relief 😮💨
Both CPI and PPI exceeded expectations, which should have cooled the market, but Wash's last speech before the silent period at the IMF meeting in Bangkok didn't discuss the interest rate path or hawkishness, only emphasizing price stability. The market immediately changed its interpretation: the probability of a rate hike in October was lowered, US Treasury yields fell, the dollar weakened, and BTC and ETH stabilized simultaneously. 📉
This rebound isn't about one leading the other, but more like a rotation of funds following a loosening of rate expectations. The Fed's communication style has also changed; with two rate meetings left this year and no early hints, the market can only guess. 🤔
Wash also mentioned that continued global rate hikes will drag down the economy; AI is beneficial for long-term inflation control but may impact employment in the short term. It sounds balanced, not a strong tightening signal.
On the charts, BTC is oscillating within a range with bulls and bears deadlocked; ETH is slightly stronger in the short term but not yet showing a trend reversal. Institutions also warn: tightening concerns are only temporarily eased, the rate hike card is still in play, so don't be blindly bullish. ⚠️
Next key anchor point to watch is BTC at the 80,000 level. Whether it breaks through or falls back may decide the short-term market sentiment direction. $BTC $ETH $ZEC 🚀#特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ What are the opposing traders doing when losing money?
25,700 likes, 9 comments.
This ratio itself is off.
How is this number calculated:
Likes represent sentiment, comments represent disagreement.
No one refutes, meaning most people are in the same position.
Following who:
The more people losing money, the fewer willing to sell.
With thin sell orders, less volume is needed for the price to drop further.
The rebound isn't because someone comes to save it, but because the sellers have sold out first.
Watch the trading volume, not the price.
#机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？
#$ZEC #SpaceXQ3Earnings is what management is using to pitch $100B+ annualized revenue by end of 2026. 61d021b8
*Stock setup going in:*
- Closed Friday at $146.03, down 10%+ this week, below 50-day
- Market cap ∼$1.925T, still far off June high of $225.64
- Lockup overhang: Up to 1.3B shares become eligible to sell 2 days _after_ Q3 results. That's the biggest unlock of 2026 1264f832
Q2 was all about hype. Q3 has to show it can turn rockets + satellites + AI data centers into actual cash flow.#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus 10/17 On-Chain: Is the $950M Liquidation Flush Over?
Middle East tensions lifted US PPI to 6.3%, triggering $950M in liquidations.
$BTC $81.8K: New whales hold 33% of whale cap at a ~$77K cost. The $80K dip cleared leverage; $77K–$80K is a floor.
$ETH $2,450: Weakest. $44.4M ETF outflow, ~290K ETH sent to exchanges, VanEck pulled its stETH ETF. The 50-day EMA caps upside.
$SOL $104.7: TVL down $670M to $5.94B, but the Alpenglow upgrade lands Oct 21 (150ms confirmations). Hold $100.Before next week's earnings report, I am more inclined to believe that US stock META will experience a rebound. The company disclosed new data this week showing AI improving advertising effectiveness, and its stock price was more resilient than QQQ throughout the week. The foundation of the advertising business is still there, which makes me less pessimistic, but I remain reserved about whether the AI investment is worthwhile. After closing at $762.50 on Tuesday, META fell for three consecutive days, closing at $709.33 on Friday. This drop is significant, but the weekly decline is about 1.3%, while QQQ fell about 5.5% in the same period. A smaller drop does not mean the bottom has been reached; if it breaks below Friday's low of $702.71 next week and continues to fall, I will have to revise my judgment about a rebound before the earnings report. Meta's engineering team disclosed on October 13 that the advertising recommendation model GEM increased ad conversions by 18.9% and click-through rates by 12%. This is the effect reported by the company and cannot be directly converted into revenue growth, but it at least shows that AI is already improving the existing advertising business. Better advertising effectiveness gives advertisers more reason to continue investing. This is more convincing to me than just talking about what can be done in the future. The Q2 earnings report released in July also showed corresponding operational performance: ad impressions increased by 14% year-over-year, and average ad prices rose by 12%. Both volume and price are growing, and the company's revenue increased by 28% year-over-year. These results cannot be entirely attributed to GEM, but we also cannot view advertising demand negatively just because tech stocks have recently fallen sharply. However, Meta is also spending quickly. In the same quarter, operating cash flow was about $31.9 billion, and capital expenditures were about $31.1 billion, according to the company's equipment deductions Don't be fooled by the fact that HYPE, ASTER, and UNI all have buyback and burn mechanisms as DEX platform tokens; the market clearly differentiates their trends based on where the money flows.
$HYPE is the one with genuine burn support, $ASTER essentially bets on new narrative funds, and $UNI still needs a new round of catalysts.
1. HYPE's revenue burn loop is the strongest. AQAv2 consistently burns tokens monthly, with an annualized 900 million buyback in place. Today it pulled back about 2% with the overall market but has the thickest floor, being the only one in the sector to run buybacks like a mechanical flow.
2. ASTER rose against the trend near 0.7 today, indicating some support. But its narrative is too new, and despite backing from adjacent traffic, its market cap is still small. Both TVL and revenue need validation, so the probability of success feels low.
3. UNI's momentum has cooled, and its trend is the steadiest but dullest, oscillating around 7.2. Unichain and fee switch progress have been ongoing for a year, but real revenue conversion is too slow. As the AMM market leader, its growth narrative is tired; today it also dropped about 2%.$STRK perpetual 50x short, opened at 0.07893, marked at 0.07082, floating profit +513.74%.
The trade is based on technical overbought conditions and event realization: STRK surged over 200% this month due to L1 transformation rumors, with 4-hour indicators extremely overbought, 0.1265 as a phase top. The 10.15 unlock arrived as expected, long positions crowded and liquidated, price broke supports at 0.08 and 0.075 consecutively.
Currently at 0.07082, the daily Bollinger Bands open downward, rebound lacks volume. The 0.065-0.070 range is the previous startup zone with some buying; if the rebound to 0.075 lacks volume, it remains a point for short position additions.
Subsequent trend: high-leverage short positions yield substantial profits, need to watch 0.065 support, break below targets 0.06; if consolidation digests, must wait for both macro and unlock sentiment to stabilize. $BTC $ETH #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ Funding rate turns from negative to positive: Dogecoin contract sentiment is recovering
Let me mention a data point most people don’t watch: the funding rate.
On the morning settlement of October 15, the $DOGE rate was still -0.0020%, negative. A negative funding rate means there are too many shorts; shorts have to pay longs, which is the tail end of panic. In the next two settlements, the rate returned to +0.0066% and +0.0097%, with the latest annualized rate about 10.6%.
The shift from negative to positive indicates two things. First, the panic has passed a round; the moment when most feared going long is over. Second, new longs are opening positions at low prices and are willing to pay to hold them, which is direct evidence of sentiment recovery. When it comes to sentiment, data is more reliable than words.
But recovery doesn’t mean no cost. The total market open interest is still $1.26 billion, which is not low. If the funding rate continues to rise while the price remains flat, the holding cost for longs will accumulate day by day, and those who can’t bear it will be gradually worn out by fees. The funding rate is a signal of recovery and also the bill for the longs.
My stance: happy, but not rushing to celebrate. Both the funding rate turning positive and the price stabilizing need to happen together to count. The first is here now; the second is still awaited.
Slow recovery is better than collapse.ETH's 2,400 Defense Battle: Panic and Short Squeeze Occur Simultaneously
ETH fell below $2,400, dropping 2.2% in 24 hours, and market sentiment quickly turned cold. ETFs saw net outflows of $190 million over two consecutive days, with BlackRock's ETHA redeeming $44.39 million; even more striking, a whale who opened a position at $4,600 and held for a year deposited 15,400 ETH to the exchange, expecting a loss of $13.45 million upon exit. The group chat started flooding with "ETH is doomed."
But the other side of the market is not quiet. The liquidation heatmap shows that if ETH breaks above $2,537, the cumulative short liquidation intensity on major CEXs reaches $862 million, nearly twice the long liquidation intensity below. In other words, once the price triggers upward, shorts may be more crowded than longs. On the macro side, Wash at the IMF refused to predict an October rate hike, and the probability of a rate hike dropped from 27% to below 15%, indicating a marginal easing of expectations.
With thin weekend liquidity, $2,420 has become a short-term dividing line. Holding it means a $500 million-level short position acts like a fuse; losing it could suppress sentiment for another round. Cut losses or hold on? Let's discuss in the comments.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 PONS's trading volume in this hour has already exceeded twice that of the entire previous hour, yet the price still clings to the low point.
As of 20:20 Beijing time, OKEx spot price is $0.3055, down about 10.7% in 24 hours. The trading volume for the 20:00 hour is about $197,500, while the full 19:00 hour was $93,800. The lowest price at 20:00 was $0.3033.
I tend to believe the selling pressure remains. After the volume expanded, the price is only about 0.7% away from the low point, and currently, there is no sign of a strong recovery. The easiest misjudgment is to mistake volume expansion directly for a bottoming out; the 20:00 hourly candle has not yet closed.
If the 20:00 candle closes above the opening price of $0.3112, I will reassess this judgment; if it still hovers near $0.3033, then we will see if the next full hour can break away from the low.
$PONS A few days ago, after watching Sun Yuchen's interview, I developed some new thoughts about $BTC BTC. Bitcoin is essentially a decentralized token built on hash algorithms.
Currently, the two main pillars supporting BTC's value narrative are the four-year halving cycle and the always untouched Satoshi Nakamoto holdings.
Here I share a somewhat bold speculation: In recent years, AI technology has successively solved many long-standing mathematical problems. Is there a possibility in the future that AI could exhaustively crack a large number of addresses that have had on-chain transactions, possibly even including Satoshi Nakamoto's account?
If this really happens, the impact would be twofold. In the short term, it would definitely be a black swan event, causing market panic and a rapid drop in BTC price. But looking at the longer time frame, could this actually clear the biggest hidden risk for BTC's market? Once this Damocles sword hanging over the market falls, the market would no longer need to continuously worry about this potential risk. $ETH #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点
After the U.S. stock market closes on October 20, Netflix will release its Q3 earnings report. Looking at the market prediction bets in the chart, 71% of the funds are betting that its performance will exceed expectations, so everyone's expectations are already set quite high.
Let's first look at the fundamentals. The company itself expects revenue of $12.86 billion, a 12% year-over-year increase, with an operating margin forecast of 33.2%, significantly higher than last year's 28.2%. The improvement in profit margin indicates effective internal cost reduction and efficiency improvements, strengthening its profitability.
But the problem is also clear. A 12% revenue growth rate is obviously a slowdown compared to the 20-30% surges in previous years. Regarding subscription users, almost everyone worldwide who could subscribe has already done so, hitting the ceiling. So now the market's focus is entirely on the advertising business.
The question is whether the previously launched low-price ad-supported plan can really turn into hard cash. If advertising revenue can successfully fill the gap left by the slowing subscriptions, then Netflix's valuation logic will completely change. But if there are only viewers and advertisers don't pay, then the trouble will be big.
Currently, the 71% probability betting on exceeding expectations is actually quite risky. With market expectations so high, if next quarter's guidance is even slightly worse, or if the monetization speed of advertising revenue isn't fast enough, the stock price could plummet immediately.
For the crypto market, Netflix represents the sentiment of the U.S. tech and consumer sectors. $NFLX $xNFLX The recently released U.S. September PPI data has poured cold water on the market. Both month-on-month and year-on-year increases exceeded expectations. The core signal is not energy price fluctuations, but that upstream cost pressures are fully transmitting to the real economy.
People usually focus on the terminal CPI, but PPI is actually the leading indicator at the forefront of the supply chain. When producers feel cost squeezes, these pressures will sooner or later be passed on to consumers' bills.
What’s more troublesome is that Wall Street institutions predict the September core PCE month-on-month increase will jump from 0.25% in August to 0.32%. Once the Fed’s most watched indicator rebounds, expectations for macro liquidity easing will be completely shattered. The market was previously hoping for a pause in rate hikes, but the data surge has left the Fed no way out. Continuing rate hikes this year, or even starting this month, has shifted from an optional question to a mandatory one.
From the perspective of risk asset liquidity, the transmission of upstream costs essentially further tightens the total network liquidity. The risk-free yield anchor is pushed higher, and the trend of capital flowing back to fixed income assets is becoming clearer.
Going forward, market liquidity will still face significant squeezes, and the cost-effectiveness of chasing short-term rebounds is very low. Before the macro shoe drops and the inflation transmission path is cut off, holding onto cash flow is much wiser than frequently striking during the frozen period.
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ $BTC The EU sold BTC this week
Asia bought BTC this week
The US has no activity this weekActually, there isn't a single cent of interest in U wallets, and it seems like hardly anyone cares about it normally. The Bank for International Settlements, which acts as a bank for central banks around the world, analyzed data over several years and found that even a slight increase in interest rates on US bank deposits slows down the growth of stablecoins, with USDC being even more affected than USDT. It makes sense—Americans can easily deposit money in banks, and if the interest is attractive enough, who would bother exchanging for U?