Orbit Post Sitemap
$BTC three core variables synchronized this week:
Policy side: The CLARITY Act vote result was 50:50, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold, disproving the positive regulatory logic for crypto. The market has fully priced this in, with limited subsequent impact.
Monetary side: The probability of a 25bp rate hike at the September FOMC is over 92%, with the core variable shifting to Chairman Powell's press conference wording. A hawkish stance may trigger BTC to test 72,000; a dovish stance would see strong support at 77,000.
Tax side: The House Ways and Means Committee is advancing a crypto tax bill on the same day; the implementation of wash sale rules will significantly narrow the year-end tax selling window, creating liquidity pressure.
Positioning advice: BTC 77,000 / ETH 2,440 / ZEC 1,048 are three stop-loss lines; triggering any means reducing positions by 10%. Early bottom-fishing is not recommended; wait for clear policy signals before reassessing direction. ⚠️ The CLARITY bill vote was blocked, and the Federal Reserve is set to reveal its stance tonight, marking a critical juncture for the crypto community.
CLARITY failed to reach the 60-vote threshold, causing the previously priced-in regulatory optimism to evaporate. $BTC briefly dropped back to around 75,000. The bill's blockage itself isn't the main concern; the real pressure lies in the upcoming FOMC meeting, where regulatory expectations and the two main themes of interest rates and liquidity simultaneously reach a critical moment.
So tonight, don't just focus on the bill; the true determinant of the next phase's direction will be the Federal Reserve's policy path and the tone of its statements.
On the charts, watch three key levels first: $BTC 75,000, $ETH 2,400, $SOL 100.
If BTC holds 75,000, it indicates that after panic selling, there is still support; if it breaks down with volume, be cautious of further declines seeking lower support.
I'm not in a hurry to be bearish right now. What’s truly worth observing is whether the price will fall after all the negative news has been priced in.
If the Fed leans hawkish but BTC consistently fails to break below 75,000 and then reclaims that key level, the market may have already priced in a significant portion of the bad news.
No directional guesses tonight; first, watch how 75,000 behaves. Price reaction is more important than any prediction.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 $BTC $ETH — Tonight’s CLARITY Act procedural vote requires 60 Senate votes. Polymarket currently prices passage at around 30%, up from 12% on Aug. 31.
$BTC: $76.5K–$77K remains a key support zone. Greater regulatory clarity could help strengthen institutional demand.
$ETH: DeFi clarity, staking, and RWA adoption continue to support its catch-up narrative, while 10Y yields above 5% increase the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets.
#FOMCRateCallThisWeek #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow 📉 The CLARITY procedural vote was blocked, why did the crypto market suddenly plunge?
The market was originally expecting regulatory benefits to be traded in advance tonight, but the vote failed to reach the required 60 votes. After the expectations were dashed, profit-taking funds quickly cashed out. $BTC fell from around 79,000 to below 76,000, while $ETH, $SOL, and $XRP weakened simultaneously, indicating this was more like a "disappointment + leverage liquidation" combo.
More critically, the price breaking short-term support triggered massive stop-losses and liquidations. Over the past 24 hours, liquidation volume exceeded $300 million, and the original selling pressure was further amplified by derivatives.
However, this does not mean the long-term logic has completely changed. Similar procedural votes have been blocked before, and there is still the possibility of renegotiation and continued progress afterward. What the market really faces now is the next big event—the FOMC.
If the Federal Reserve signals hawkishness, short-term pressure may continue to be released; if the negative news is gradually digested by the market, and BTC and ETH stop falling and reclaim key positions, it will be worth watching.
Don't rush to bottom-fish tonight. News is a catalyst, leverage amplifies volatility, but ultimately price determines direction.
#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #贝森特听证释放多重信号 Some orders are just like this: the more you watch them, the more they stall; the moment you turn away, they move. When the market was just dumped in the morning session, $ZEC had a slight rebound, but it was heavily suppressed above, volume didn't keep up, and the rebound was weak, so I opened a short position immediately.
Entered at 1,150.77, target at 1,107.69, with +187.57% profit in hand, feeling good brothers. The previous endurance was worth it.
First close 80%, move the remaining 20% stop-loss to the cost price; if it continues to drop, let the profit run, and if it rebounds, don't give back the profit.
The premise of compounding is survival; the shortcut to getting rich quickly often leads to zero.
If you miss it, don't chase; the market is not short of opportunities, but patience is lacking. Move again when the next signal appears.
$DOGE $ADA #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议
The leader has something to say
The procedural vote on the CLARITY Act did not pass. 49 votes in favor, 50 against, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold, so it cannot proceed to formal review for now. This is not a final rejection; the Republicans can still reconsider, but short-term sentiment has already been hit.
Bitcoin briefly fell below 75,000, and crypto-related stocks like Coinbase and Circle followed the decline. The disagreements are stuck on conflicts of interest involving the Trump family, stablecoin rewards, state-level enforcement authority, and consumer protection, with no consensus between the sides.
For the market, this is a short-term negative. Expectations for the bill's progress have been dashed, and regulatory certainty is postponed. However, the SEC and CFTC can still fill gaps with administrative rules, so it's not a total loss.
I had a long position at 76,700+ that I stopped out when it fell below 75,000. Now I am out of the market waiting for the FOMC, not rushing to bottom-fish. The bill's setback is an emotional shock; wait for the market to digest it before looking at entry points. If Bitcoin can stabilize between 74,000 and 75,000, then consider re-entering. $BTC $ETH $ZEC
Short-term outlook is consolidation, mid-term waiting for direction. Don't chase sharp rises, don't panic on sharp drops, set stop losses properly.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; always set stop losses on your trades. Good luck.9.16 BTC Layout Strategy
BTC initially surged to 79771 then continuously fell back, with a low probe at 74909.4, current price at 75616. On the indicators, the channel lines (yellow, white, purple) are all pressing above the price, and the MACD bearish green bars below are expanding, indicating a low-level oscillation phase after a high-level pullback. Going long is a rebound play betting on a bottoming recovery, not a trend-driven long; focus on light position trial orders, avoid heavy bottom-fishing.
Entry Range
75200-75400 range for low-buy long
Logic: Enter when price pulls back to above the intraday low support at 74909, K-line forms a small bullish candle signaling a stop in the decline without making new lows, and buying demand appears; avoid chasing longs above 75600, as chasing highs is likely to be suppressed and fall back by the moving averages above.
Stop Loss Setting
Stop loss: below 74800
If the price body breaks below the previous low of 74909, it indicates the support below has failed, bears will continue to probe lower, exit immediately, do not hold the position.
Take Profit Targets (two levels)
- First take profit: 76500, reduce half the position upon reaching to lock in some profit; this is a short-term moving average resistance level and likely to face resistance.
- Second take profit: 77400, hold the remaining position to this level if volume breaks through 76500; if price faces pressure and falls back at 76500, exit all remaining longs immediately. $BTC #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ BTC75622, the bulls and bears are arguing again, let me explain the logic on both sides.
Bulls: The price is still above the 74896 support, after such a drop, a rebound could happen anytime, bottom-fishing has a good risk-reward ratio. Plan: Stabilize at 74896, try long at 5000U, stop loss at 74500, target 76500.
Bears: The trend is bearish, the rebound is weak, the resistance at 78054 is very strong, any rebound is a shorting opportunity. Plan: Try short between 77000-77500, stop loss above 78000, target 74896.
My view: Both sides are right, it depends on the position. Near 74896, listen to the bulls; above 77000, listen to the bears; in the middle, listen to neither, just observe. Follow the trend once a breakout happens.
Always use stop loss for every trade, don’t hold losing positions. Currently recovering from a 200,000U loss, no allegiance, just responding to the market. Which side are you on? $BTC #Update on September 16
After the sharp drop last night, we are seeing a rebound today, but it is relatively weak. The current range is between 2385 and 2420, with strong resistance at 2035 - 2465. Support below is seen at 2355-2360.
On the 1-hour chart for Bitcoin, there is a parallel high point at 759. If you currently hold long positions, be cautious of a false breakout. Also, pay attention to the 755 level; if it breaks down, a rebound short target would be between 745 and 738.
The early morning plunge was mainly triggered by the failure of the <Digital Asset Market Information Act> to pass the Senate procedural vote, which is a substantial negative factor. Market sentiment is currently fragile, so if you open positions, it is recommended to keep your position size below half of the normal level.
Wishing all traders a big profit today as well The bill failed, and the global bond market followed suit with volatility, as major players conveniently triggered 500 million in high-leverage long positions. BTC is currently at 75,691, down nearly 3%; ETH at 2,399, down 4.6%; OKB at 111.16, down 1.65%. The market is basically drained of liquidity, breaking downwards to find a bottom.
Sectors are also diverging: GameFi rose against the trend by 9.38%, PayFi plunged 7.14%, showing strong risk-off sentiment. In the past 12 hours, the entire network liquidated 585 million, with longs accounting for 498 million; BTC and ETH combined cut 408 million, causing a chain liquidation stampede.
On the ETF side, BTC net inflow is 160 million, ETH 121 million; Morgan Stanley MSBT also withdrew 123.21 BTC from Coinbase Prime, with traditional whales quietly accumulating. On the macro front, the Senate rejected CLARITY by 49 to 50, US and Japanese government bond yields surged, the threat of rate hikes lingers, and liquidity is bleeding everywhere.
The old rule: before the bad news is fully priced in, sentiment must plunge into extreme fear to see the true bottom. Spot can be bought in batches; don’t go all in at once. Wash out the leverage bubble and survive this winter to truly win. Personal opinion, not financial advice.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 🔥 Early morning funds continue to screen for strength and weakness. Who among ETH, SUI, and BICO can lead the acceleration?
With this week's FOMC approaching, the market remains prone to fluctuations. Now, rather than guessing who will rise, it's more important to observe who can truly break out.
$ETH focuses on an active breakout after consolidation. Continuous volume contraction on pullbacks and rising lows indicate weakening selling pressure; if volume increases and it holds above the upper range, risk appetite may further expand. Repeated failed rallies mean the consolidation could extend.
$SUI still shows strong elasticity, but the key lies in support after the breakout. Price close to resistance with sustained buying, and a pullback that doesn't break the original resistance zone after breakout, looks like a valid breakout; a quick drop back into the range warns of a false breakout.
$BICO is more about chip accumulation and transaction continuity. Volume contraction on pullbacks and rising lows, with a clear volume surge on breakout, indicate funds shifting from probing to active buying. If high-level turnover continues, elasticity has a chance to further release.
Looking ahead, watch for ETH holding steady, SUI breaking out, and BICO increasing volume; on the downside, see who falls back into the consolidation zone first.
True quality acceleration is not about how strong the first surge is, but whether there is follow-up capital after the breakout.
#OKX预言家：来星球玩预测 #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 Account Position Divergence Radar
$DOGE top accounts are more long, position distribution is more short: top accounts long-short ratio 1.847, top positions long-short ratio 0.760; whole market accounts long-short ratio 4.566; price up 0.101%, position amount change +0.70%.
$SUI top accounts and top positions are both more short: top accounts long-short ratio 0.794, top positions long-short ratio 0.743; whole market accounts long-short ratio 3.566; net price change 0%, position amount change +0.82%. The structure of the number of accounts and position distribution in the top group are aligned.
$SNDK top accounts are more long, position distribution is more short: top accounts long-short ratio 1.396, top positions long-short ratio 0.752; whole market accounts long-short ratio 2.918; price down 0.034%, position amount change +0.24%.
DOGE, SNDK: the side dominating in account numbers is opposite to the side dominating in positions, indicating divergence between account structure and position distribution.
DOGE, SUI, SNDK: the whole market account structure is more long, which also differs from the top position bias.The Saudi East-West oil pipeline may be out of operation for several weeks. This time, it is no longer a brief emotional shock but a physical supply shortage.
After the Strait of Hormuz was blocked, this pipeline took on a large amount of rerouted exports. Now multiple locations require repairs, and regional officials expect most of the transport capacity could be interrupted for several weeks, potentially affecting millions of barrels per day. A pipeline is not software that can be restored by switching servers; if any part of the pump stations, pipelines, power supply, or safety inspections is incomplete, it cannot be repressurized and operated.
The most dangerous phase for oil prices may come after inventory buffers are gradually depleted. A few days ago, the market could still trust Saudi Arabia to use inventories and adjust port shipments to maintain deliveries. Once the downtime extends, European refineries will receive more and more delay or cancellation notices, and the risk will move from futures screens into the real supply chain.
What is even more unsettling is that the repair teams are fixing old damage but cannot guarantee there won’t be another attack. The market’s final pricing will not be just for a few weeks of production but whether this strategic channel can still be considered a reliable backup.
#沙特关键输油管道受损，或停运数周 I've noticed that after trading crypto for a long time, people gradually lose one ability:
they can't calculate money anymore.
A friend says their monthly salary is 10,000:
Not bad.
Exchange popup: funding fee deducted 100U:
Oh.
Friend lost 20,000 buying a car:
Damn, that hurts.
I lost 2,000U in a single night:
Hold on, there's support at this level 😂
The most amazing thing is that the moment you exit the exchange, your brain suddenly returns to normal:
Video streaming membership fee increased by 5 yuan?
No way, I absolutely can't let them make that money.Chip stocks collectively fell, not because AI orders suddenly disappeared, but because the market began to recalculate: if AI development really needs to slow down, how much are those previously infinitely projected demands still worth?
After leaders of AI companies like Anthropic called for more time for safety mechanisms, the semiconductor sector saw a significant sell-off. Recent revenues of companies like Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom remain strong, but the problem lies in valuations based not on today's revenue, but on the sustained expansion of computing power demand over many years.
As long as training scales continue to grow, chips, power, memory, and network equipment can all share the capital expenditure dividends. Once model releases slow down, regulatory approvals increase, or experiments require more safety testing, revenues won't immediately drop to zero but may be realized a quarter or two later. For high-valuation stocks, a "delay" is enough to cause a significant change in discounted cash flow models.
I don't think this means the AI rally is over, but it reveals an awkward fact: the market hopes AI is powerful enough to reshape the world, yet also safe enough to never have to hit the brakes.
In the past, chip stocks sold speed; now, for the first time, the market is seriously pricing in the "slowdown risk."
#AI发展焦虑升温，监管讨论升级 The most important thing tonight may not be the 25 basis point rate hike, but whether the Federal Reserve is willing to admit: oil prices are causing it to lose control over the inflation trajectory.
The market has already fully priced in the rate hike. If the outcome meets expectations, the real determinants of BTC, U.S. stocks, and gold direction will be three sets of numbers in the economic forecast: year-end interest rates, core inflation, and unemployment rate.
If the Fed raises its inflation forecast while maintaining economic growth expectations, it means it believes the U.S. economy can still withstand higher rates, and the door to further rate hikes will not be closed. Conversely, if the unemployment forecast rises significantly but tightening is still insisted upon, the market will start trading on a "policy mistake."
I will especially watch the dispersion of the committee's forecasts. The median in the dot plot is striking, but the size of the divergence better reflects internal confidence. If some support continued rate hikes while others already worry about a recession, this meeting will release not direction, but uncertainty.
The 25 basis points is just tonight's price; the economic forecast is the manual for the coming months. What the market fears most has never been the rate hike itself, but that the Federal Reserve does not know when it can stop.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Wait, don't directly interpret "about 300 million long positions liquidated in about twenty minutes" as "spot market is also collectively fleeing."
After the procedural CLARITY vote in the Senate on September 15 Eastern Time failed, BTC briefly dropped below about $75,000. Summary: about $300 million in crypto long positions were forcibly liquidated within about twenty minutes; in the past 24 hours, the entire market liquidations totaled about $770 million, of which about $570 million were long positions. This looks more like a leveraged chain liquidation amplifying the short-term drop, not meaning "everyone is selling spot."
A common misunderstanding is to take liquidation numbers as evidence of institutional spot market exit. Forced liquidation only indicates excessive leverage, not that spot buyers are all abandoning positions. Next, more attention should be paid to whether spot ETFs have continuous outflows, and whether volatility will amplify again after today's FOMC announcement Eastern Time. Don't take sensational liquidation charts as signals of spot market settlement.
You can check BTC USDT perpetual contracts on OKX to do your own research, DYOR, this does not constitute investment advice. The CLARITY bill results fell short of market expectations, and the previously hyped regulatory optimism quickly dissipated, leading to a wave of emotional release for Bitcoin.
The first wave of news impact has already landed, but market sentiment has not been fully digested yet. The market is likely to enter a tug-of-war with back-and-forth friction, maintaining high volatility.
From the Hengce perspective on the current market:
▪ Under major news disturbances, the reference value of various technical indicators is weakened; do not rely solely on candlestick signals for judgment.
▪ Avoid impulsive bottom-fishing or chasing trends; prioritize observing the market's capital absorption strength and beware of stop-loss sweeps.
▪ In volatile markets, position management always comes first—seek to protect yourself before aiming for profits.
The narrative around the bill has not completely ended; it has only been postponed overall. Going forward, on one hand, monitor the capital absorption performance within the market, and on the other, pay attention to external disturbances brought by macro data. After big rises and falls, emotional openings are most likely to occur, and rushing to recover losses often leads to passive positions.
Viewing the market through Hengce, always maintain a sense of respect and patiently wait for the situation to become clearer. $BTC $ETH 🔴 Altcoins collectively suffer a bloodbath! Liquidity dries up with no resistance in the market
$XRP $SOL $ZEC
This recent market move is definitely an unprovoked bloodbath for altcoins 📉.
$XRP plunged 7% in a single day, with the price crashing directly to 1.28, after holding steady at 1.45 the previous day — a shocking short-term retracement;
$SOL broke below the psychological 100 mark to 97, where the market had widely regarded 100 as a key defensive floor, now that support has been lost.
The most alarming aspect of this market: this round of decline was almost without any sudden negative catalysts.
It’s purely a market liquidity contraction; once buying dries up, the coins have no support, and even slight selling pressure causes rapid drops.
Sharing my real trading experience with $ZEC short positions:
The price fell from 1224 to 1111. Although my short position entered at 822 captured some profit, it’s still 300U away from breaking even overall.
The market dropped over a hundred points, so this profit is just a drop in the bucket. I missed the chance to exit at 1040, and now after the fall, I’ve become numb, mentally worn down by the market.
Looking back to reanalyze the market logic:
We used to chase news, narratives, and ETF hotspots. But at this stage, the only "main theme" is a capital stampede.
Whales exit first, retail investors are forced to cut losses, and those holding positions inside can only fight for slim opportunities amid the ruins after the drop.
In the short term, under this liquidity tightening market, watching more and trading less is the best strategy; the more frequently you trade, the easier it is to get cut back and forth. Are many people like me, feeling uneasy watching BTC drop to 75622?
Want to buy the dip but fear it will fall further; want to wait and see but fear missing a sudden rebound. I totally understand this dilemma. I used to be like this, watching the market every day, emotions following the price, ending up with no profit and a broken mindset.
Later I realized: the dilemma comes from having no plan. With a plan, knowing exactly what to do at each price point, there's no more hesitation.
Here’s my plan to share with you: if 74896 doesn’t break, lightly go long with a stop loss at 74500; if it rebounds to 77000-77500, lightly go short with a stop loss above 78000; do nothing in between. Each trade is 5000U, always with a stop loss, no holding losing positions.
Currently recovering from a 200,000U loss. Instead of hesitating, better to set a plan and then execute. $BTC #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 $HYPE you're acting a bit arrogant. BTC and ETH both dropped over a point, yet you're still sideways. Are you trying to overtake on a curve, aiming to take down the top two? Total market cap is over seventy billion $, circulating supply is just over twenty percent, circulating market cap is over seventeen billion. The unlock schedule at the back is unclear—whether it's undisclosed or quietly offloading. Do you really think you're worth a trillion market cap?While mining companies are sweeping up Bitcoin
Ethereum bulls are repeatedly being stopped out
So is it the main force accumulating
Or is leverage sending people to their deaths? Lookonchain shows MARA Holdings bought 1,292 $BTC through FalconX
About $98.64 million
This is a balance sheet-level spot demand
Mining companies are pulling coins off the market
What OKEx order book shows is depth being drained
Not contracts washing each other; Ethereum's other side is even more dangerous
Huang Licheng is highly leveraged long
Account stopped out continuously from about 12.3 million to about 1 million
Another giant whale has been 8x long 45,000 ETH since August 31
Floating loss about 4.295 million
Margin insufficient
Stop loss will become fuel for the other side
Funding fees and liquidation walls speak before narratives, so who is more dangerous?
Bitcoin's danger lies in price position
Ethereum's danger lies in position structure
Mining companies sweeping coins cannot automatically mean spot will rally
High leverage liquidations also cannot automatically mean trend is over
On OKEx, two things to watch
Whether large spot orders can appear continuously
Whether ETH long leverage has come down
Accumulating and sending people to their deaths can happen on the same day
Those who survive are the ones who didn't max out their margin
XRP current price about $1.28
24-hour drop about 10.1%
Volume about 5.77 billion
Bitcoin dropped only about 3% in the same period
Altcoins dropped more than three times the blue chips
Is this risk being realized early
Or is $XRP's own liquidity problematic? Even more misaligned is that fundamentals are still talking about sponsorship History doesn't repeat itself, but it always rhymes. What does BTC's current trend look like?
Current price 75622, resistance 78054, support 74896, bearish bias. This kind of "weak rebound, lower center of gravity" pattern has appeared several times before, and it always ends with testing support first, then deciding the direction.
The last similar trend: the price hovered above support for a few days, then suddenly a big bearish candle smashed the support, followed by a quick rebound, leading to a recovery rally. There was also a time it broke down directly and declined steadily.
So at this position, the key is whether 74896 can hold. If it holds, the probability of a rebound is high; if it doesn't, look down to 73500.
My operation: if 74896 doesn't break, lightly go long with 5000U, stop loss at 74500; if it breaks, go short following the trend, target 73500. Every trade must have a stop loss, no holding losing positions.
Currently recovering from a 200,000U loss, history offers probabilities, not guarantees. Follow the plan and leave the rest to the market. $BTC #BTC's relative resilience is a defensive signal, not a show of strength. It is down 2.72% over 24 hours, while ETH and SOL are down more than 4% each. That gap makes me skeptical of a broad rebound: strength needs to extend beyond the asset falling least.
Just my read, not advice.⚠️ Market review only, not investment advice
US East 9-15 ETF Capital Brief, unit: million USD
‑$BTC Spot ETF: +147.42
After several days of continuous outflows, a single-day inflow occurred.
However, the seven-day cumulative is still ‑336.16M, indicating the single-day inflow is a phase bottom-fishing, and the funds that fled in the previous week have not been largely replenished.
Top IBIT contributed the main buying, some veteran funds still had slight redemptions, showing internal fund differentiation.
$ETH Spot ETF: +95.44
Continues to maintain net inflows.
Seven-day cumulative +221.91M, weekly funds keep entering, institutional preference is clearly stronger than BTC, fund rotation pattern continues.
Market interpretation
1. BTC turning positive in a single day is a positive signal, but a single-day inflow cannot directly determine a trend reversal; confirmation requires continuous large net inflows for 2-3 days.
2. Institutions have not completely exited the crypto sector; it is more of asset rebalancing, with ETH continuously benefiting.
3. The current biggest variables are the Federal Reserve interest rate decision and the CLARITY bill vote. Institutions are temporarily testing with small positions and will not make large bets, waiting for news to unfold.
Watchlist alert unchanged: BTC-ETF continuous large net outflows for two days + BTC daily close below key support, pause active long positions.
Focus going forward: After the interest rate decision, whether BTC can maintain continuous multi-day net inflows; whether ETH's inflow momentum will weaken
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 ⚠️ Market review only, not investment advice
US East 9-15 ETF Capital Brief, unit: million USD
- BTC Spot ETF: +147.42
After several days of continuous outflows before the end, a single-day inflow occurred.
However, the seven-day cumulative is still -336.16M, indicating the single-day inflow is a phase bottom-fishing, and the funds that fled in the previous week have not been largely replenished.
Top IBIT contributed the main buying, some veteran funds still had slight redemptions, showing internal fund differentiation.
- ETH Spot ETF: +95.44
Continues to maintain net inflows.
Seven-day cumulative +221.91M, weekly funds continue to enter, institutional preference is clearly stronger than BTC, fund rotation pattern continues.
Market interpretation
1. BTC turning positive in a single day is a positive signal, but a single-day inflow cannot directly determine a trend reversal; confirmation requires continuous large net inflows for 2-3 days.
2. Institutions have not completely exited the crypto sector; it is more of asset rebalancing, with ETH continuously benefiting.
3. The current biggest variables are the Federal Reserve interest rate decision and the CLARITY Act vote. Institutions are temporarily testing with small positions and will not make large bets, waiting for news to materialize.
Watchlist alert unchanged: BTC-ETF continuous large net outflows for two days + BTC daily close below key support, pause active long positions.
Focus going forward: After the interest rate decision, whether BTC can maintain continuous multi-day net inflows; whether ETH's inflow momentum will weaken. Crash Analysis
$MMT crashed today, down 15.19% in 24 hours, with a volatility amplitude reaching 15.78 percentage points, directly slamming the market.
Current price is $0.130100, with a trading volume of $974,653, volume at least doubled compared to the same period, indicating significant capital involvement.
The 24-hour high was $0.154100, the low was $0.129900, creating a 15.8-point range for trading operations.
Belonging to another sector, this round of crash is not an isolated coin event; at least 3 coins in the same track moved synchronously, showing clear sector linkage effects.
First layer: selling pressure—profit-taking concentrated on cashing out; second layer: smart money reduced positions by at least 22 percentage points in advance; third layer: retail panic causing a cascade of selling.
Observation point: check if large funds are absorbing during the decline; if trading volume shrinks to less than 30% of today's volume, then it’s a real drop, not a shakeout.
My view: do not chase the abnormal movement, wait for absorption to finish and observe the structure; if the structure breaks, don’t stubbornly hold on.
Public market data, not investment advice, judge for yourself.
This is all I see in the market; the rest is for you to realize yourself. BTC has fallen below 75K, hitting a low of 75K, with the lowest at 74,910, a new low for September. Don't just blame FOMC; this is a triple kill: policy vacuum + rate hike expectations + CLARITY failure.
24h losers list: XRP -10%, ETH -8.3%, SOL -5%, BTC -5.3%. Altcoins are even worse, with the previously biggest gainers now dropping the hardest.
115,000 people liquidated, longs bore most of it. Before the bill failed, many bottom-fished betting on "approval benefits," but the good news turned bad, and leveraged longs got wiped out.
Interestingly, ETFs weren't heavily dumped; institutions didn't panic along with retail this time. Selling pressure mainly came from derivatives and altcoins, while spot remained stable.
Now 75K is the psychological floor; if it breaks, the next floor is 70K. Are you bottom-fishing or waiting for the FOMC decision?
#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ The Clarity Act is a U.S. law specifically designed to regulate cryptocurrencies. It clearly defines the jurisdiction of the SEC and CFTC, how digital assets are classified, issued, traded, and sets rules for intermediaries and disclosure obligations.
In this vote, it was mentioned that "holders of cryptocurrencies need to sell their shares or transfer management rights" to ensure that high-ranking public officials (president, vice president, members of Congress, and their spouses) avoid conflicts of interest and maintain regulatory neutrality. This is not targeted at general crypto company managers or all holders. However, the Democratic Party believes the clause still has loopholes (existing income sources, insufficient coverage of children, enforcement mechanisms, etc.) and demands stricter measures, ultimately voting entirely against it.
The market had already anticipated that this bill might not pass, so the decline was not entirely unexpected, but it still triggered high-leverage liquidations, intensifying the downward pressure.
$BTC $ETH ⚠️ Stop calling UNI dead money! The underlying logic has quietly undergone a huge change.
Many still treat UNI as an outdated coin, but simply looking at whether it rises in the short term is meaningless; the real turning point is that the underlying value logic is being reconstructed.
In the past, even if the Uniswap protocol earned a lot in fees, UNI holders could hardly directly share the profits, causing a break in the value capture link.
But now, protocol fees have started to flow back into the token system, a buyback mechanism has been implemented, and UNI has finally closed the loop on earnings.
This actually sends an important signal to the entire DeFi sector.
Once funds flow back into the on-chain market, I will prioritize targets with real business cash flow rather than coins that rely solely on short-term narrative hype to rise.
A simple summary of three different logical main lines:
✅ ETH: The foundational settlement and liquidity cornerstone of public chains
✅ UNI: The representative target of cash flow in the DeFi sector
✅ $ZEC: The most resilient variety in this round of privacy narratives
The directions of these three sectors are completely different, but the underlying stock selection logic is the same:
Don’t just focus on who rises the most crazily in the short term; the key is to see who long-term capital is willing to price.
So when the market still labels UNI as “dead money,” I actually feel the opportunity is brewing.
Often when the market collectively ignores or dislikes something, it’s easier to find opportunities from expectation gaps. In the past 24 hours, the crypto market quickly shifted from previous rebounds to safe-haven mode. The failure to advance the CLARITY Act, US Treasury yields surpassing 5%, and weakening ETF funds combined triple pressures, causing BTC to fall to around $76,000, while ETH, SOL, and high-Beta altcoins further extended their losses. Meanwhile, over $600 million was liquidated within 24 hours, about 83% of which came from long positions. Currently, the market's core has shifted from "seeking upside opportunities" to "reducing risk and waiting for FOMC repricing." 📉 Market: Comprehensive pullback, high-beta assets see even greater declines As of 09:24 HKT: BTC $75,851, -2.74% ETH $2,402.16, -4.55% SOL $97.15, -5.21% Total crypto market cap about $2.599 trillion, 24h -5.50%, clearly weaker than BTC; BTC's market share has actually risen to 58.53%. Mainstream coins have almost all fallen. BNB fell only 0.95%, making it the most resilient among the declines; XRP fell 9.36%, XLM fell 8.73%, ADA dropped 6.48%, LINK fell 5.97%. This indicates that BTC is not weakening alone, but rather funds are prioritizing the withdrawal of more volatile altcoin assets, with market risk appetite clearly declining. Total market trading volume rose to about $104.9 billion, 24H +15.31%. The decline and amplified trading volume indicate that this correction is not simpleThe big coin also failed to hold. In the previous hour, it could still be said that it was repairing within a small range, but after closing this candle, both BTC and ETH broke through the upper and lower boundaries of that range, yet closed below it.
From 09:00 to 10:00 on September 16, OKX spot BTC closed at 75500.1 USDT, ETH at 2390.78, with hourly declines around 0.35%. The numbers are close, but ETH closed weaker: only 0.15 USDT above the lowest price of this hour.
This time it did not continue the quietness of the previous hour. BTC trading volume increased by about 44%, ETH by about 74%. I consider this "increased trading but suppressed close" more significant than a simple small bearish candle. However, increased volume only indicates more activity; it does not tell us who is selling, so there is no need to fabricate stories about institutions dumping.
Also, do not directly escalate the hourly chart changes to a full four-hour breakdown. Both coins are still within the four-hour range from 04:00 to 08:00 recently closed; first, clarify which level is weakening.
Data as of 10:05 Beijing time: BTC has returned to the old range of 08:00–09:00, ETH is still below that range. There is a rebound, but the two coins are not recovering synchronously; only if ETH can also close back above later will there be reason to reassess this drop.
The 10:00–11:00 hourly and 08:00–12:00 four-hour candles have not closed yet.
For informational purposes only, not investment advice. $20 million seed round, Coinbase Ventures is on the list again.
My first reaction wasn’t envy, but a bit annoyed.
Fin.com is working on the "last mile" of stablecoin conversion to local bank accounts. Sounds like a real necessity, but count how many in the past two years have raised round after round doing payment channels, deposits and withdrawals, or white-label services, and how many have actually lowered retail fees?
Money is flowing into infrastructure, but the valuation is undisclosed.
Undisclosed valuations usually mean one of two things: either it’s too high and they’re afraid to scare off the next round, or it’s too low and they’re embarrassed to say. I lean toward the former, after all, even Uber’s co-founder is leading the investment.
But as an old investor, to be honest—this money most likely won’t turn into the few bucks in fees you and I save; it will just become another layer of middlemen.
The last mile of stablecoins has been under construction for three years, and I’m still taking the most expensive route.
#标普领投Kaiko，布局链上数据标准 $ZEC Reviewing the recent market, my biggest lesson: bottom-fishing against the trend is deadly.
BTC has dropped from above 78,000 to the current 75,622. In between, I impulsively tried to catch the bottom twice, once at 77,000 and once at 76,000, both times taking small losses and stopping out. Although the losses weren't big, being wrong on direction is still being wrong.
Why was I wrong? Because when the trend is bearish, rebounds are opportunities to escape, not reasons to enter. I kept thinking "it’s dropped so much, it should rebound," but the market taught me: when it should rebound, it doesn’t.
Now I’ve learned: in a bearish trend, focus on shorting the rebounds, and only consider going long when support holds steady. My plan: short on the rebound between 77,000-77,500, target 74,896; if 74,896 holds, then try going long. 5,000U, always use stop loss, no holding losing positions.
Trading isn’t about guessing the bottom, it’s about waiting for signals. When the direction is right, everything flows. $BTC #Regarding storage this round, I lean more towards A: the market may not be over yet for $BTC $SOXL $SNDK
After the drop in storage prices a couple of days ago, many started shouting that the cycle was over, but I think it's still too early.
The demand for **HBM, DRAM** from AI servers is still there. Micron recently launched large-capacity DDR5 aimed at AI servers; meanwhile, market institutions still say they haven't seen clear signs of weakening in customer orders, long-term contracts, or chip prices. ([MarketWatch][1])
So what I'm more focused on now isn't how much $SNDK or MU have risen, but:
When will capacity truly ease? When will prices start to fall?
As long as these two signals haven't appeared, the logic of the storage cycle still holds.
Micron Taiwan even currently faces potential labor risks, and supply is already tight. If any further disruptions occur, prices could remain sensitive.
So for now, I stand with A: storage can still continue to rise.
But the question is:
In this round, which will see the sharpest final rise—DRAM, NAND, or will the entire $SOXL be lifted together?
Share in the comments which you favor more.Many people think that a slight pullback in BTC means the overall market is completely safe, ignoring the weak divergence in ETH.
Current market situation:
BTC current price 75441, pulling back but holding the lower point at 74896, the major structure has not completely deteriorated;
ETH current price 2389, continuing downward, MACD bearish trend persists, performance clearly weaker than BTC.
Core contradiction: funds are withdrawing from ETH, BTC shows stronger resilience, the same correction has completely different intensities for the two coins.
🔴 Invalid defense level (1-hour volume break below, pattern further deteriorates)
BTC: 74896
ETH: 2356
🟢 Reversal confirmation level (above this, short-term decline pauses, repair begins)
BTC: 77000
ETH: 2440
Trading strategy:
$BTC BTC is in a range-bound pullback, do not chase shorts, and avoid heavy bottom-fishing positions;
$ETH ETH shows a clear bearish trend, do not rush to bottom-fish on the left side to bet on a rebound.
Do you think it will test the low first, or directly rebound and repair?Saying easing verbally, but cutting orders with actions.
European clients received notice today: some crude oil orders for late September are canceled. Reason? Pipeline restoration will take "weeks," and inventory only lasts a few days. The gap can't be filled, so customers have to be cut.
The nature has changed — it's no longer "worried about supply cuts," it's already cutting off.
Europe won't sit still; it will inevitably rush to the spot market. When spot premiums rise, other buyers follow, and the chain turns; oil prices become not a matter of "how much it rises," but "who can't get it first."
Interestingly, today there was news about Oman and the US talking about easing. In the past, such news would have knocked prices down by at least two dollars. What happened? Brent still rose to 104.93, and WTI returned above 100. No one believes in easing anymore; the market now only trusts pipelines and ships, not words.
Even the US Treasury Secretary came out to smooth things over, saying the US debt shock is a "global issue." The Treasury Secretary personally passing the buck means what? Even they are uncertain.
I've been watching this line since the pipeline was bombed. At that time, I said "avoiding the wolf's den only to fall into the tiger's lair," and now the tiger's lair is really biting.
BTC dropped to 75829, oil prices were still being fueled on the eve of the FOMC, and the hammer on Thursday early morning will only be heavier.
I'm now watching two signals: pipeline repair progress and Brent oil at the 105 barrier.
Orders have been cut; guess what's next — repair or a bigger gap? $BTC The CLARITY bill was rejected. $BTC immediately dropped to 75,860, down 3.2%. 120,000 people were liquidated.
The whole network started shouting again, "The bull market is over," "Regulation is going to crack down again."
Let me ask you a question: Has BTC's essence changed because the bill was rejected? No. Are ETFs still being bought? Yes. Are institutions still entering? Yes. Has the long-term logic changed? Not at all.
What has changed? It's the sentiment. It's retail panic. It's a leverage cascade.
You need to understand one thing: The CLARITY bill was never a necessary condition for the bull market. BTC rising from 30,000 to 70,000 in 2024 was because the ETF was approved, not because of any bill. The bill passing would have been a bonus; failing it doesn't really matter. The big regulatory direction is acceptance, not suppression, and this trend won't change because of one vote.
Also, think about it, this failure was due to a procedural vote, not a formal vote. The road ahead is still long.
The 75,000 to 76,000 range is a pit dug by sentiment, not by fundamentals. A pit dug by sentiment will eventually be filled. If you panic sell today, in a couple of weeks you'll regret it.
If you don't believe me, save this message. Check the price at the end of the month.
#BTC #CLARITYBill #Crash #Regulation #TimeTravelerThe procedural vote on the "CLARITY Act" just ended: 49 in favor, 50 against. The threshold was 60 votes, missing by 11.
Then the market exploded.
Bitcoin briefly fell below $75,000, hitting a low of 74,989. Ethereum dropped to 2,358, SOL fell below 100 to 97, and XRP plunged over 10% to 1.32.
But did you notice one thing—the Senate vote happened in the early morning, but BTC only dropped later in the morning.
What does this mean? The vote result was just the fuse; the real bomb is in another direction.
Let's talk about the bill itself first.
The core of this bill is to clearly define the jurisdiction boundaries between the SEC and CFTC; the industry wants "regulatory clarity." Before the vote, Republicans even proposed a "last, best, and final" revision, adding state attorney general enforcement mechanisms, authority to respond to stablecoin deposit outflows, and developer protection clauses. Trump also agreed to transfer crypto assets into a blind trust to try to resolve ethical controversies.
And the result? Warren still wasn't convinced, and Democratic senators collectively voted against it.
What does a 50:50 vote mean? It means the problem isn't the bill itself; it's political games hijacking crypto legislation.
With 53 Republican seats, they must cross party lines to get votes. Neither party wants to bear the political cost of deciding "who regulates what between the SEC and CFTC." Kennedy put it bluntly: it might have to wait until the lame-duck session. Cruz self-mockingly quoted a movie line: "There's a big difference between 'dead' and 'mostly dead.'"
In plain language: the bill isn't dead, but it's been thrown into the political meat grinder of the midterm elections.
What does this mean for traders? Don't expect regulatory benefits in the short term. The boot hasn't dropped yet, and that's the biggest bearish factor.
Now let's talk about the really important thing—the biggest bomb this week.
The Federal Reserve's interest rate meeting.
The market's probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in September has soared to 92.4%. Goldman Sachs changed its forecast, JPMorgan changed its forecast, HSBC changed theirs too—all shifting from "no change" to "rate hike in September."
The 10-year US Treasury yield has risen to 5.045%, the highest since 2007. The 30-year yield briefly touched 5.402%.
Have you thought about what this means?
A 10-year Treasury yield above 5% means the return on "risk-free assets" is higher than your expected returns from crypto trading. Why would institutional funds take risks? That's why Bitcoin ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive trading days, totaling $449.4 million, with net assets dropping from 101.3 billion to 97.49 billion.
Liquidity is tightening, and it's a more fundamental tightening than the CLARITY Act.
The bill's boot has dropped, but the Fed's boot hasn't. The real test is at the interest rate meeting, not in the Senate.
How to watch key levels?
Downside: 74,900-75,000 is today's low and today's lifeline. The 4/8 Murray level is near 75,000. The 75,500 support that Jiang Zhuoer mentioned has already been broken. If the daily close falls below 74,900, the next stop is 72,000-73,000, and further down is the daily Fibonacci 78.6% at 72,620.
Upside: 78,000-80,000 is the first wall. A new catalyst is needed to break through effectively—either weak nonfarm payrolls or a recovery in ETF inflows, one of the two.
Solana is worse off, dropping from above 100 last week to 97 now, with staking yields falling from 5.8% to 2.2%. Altcoins are getting hit doubly hard in this environment.
Trading discipline—three things:
First, don't chase longs on the first rebound candle after bad news hits.
This is the dumbest thing retail investors do. The bill failed, the first green candle appears, they feel "the bad news is over," and rush in. Then they get hammered by the second wave and get cut clean.
Second, wait 24-48 hours to see if BTC can stabilize above 74,000.
If it can hold and close above 74,000, a short-term rebound is possible, with a target of 78,000. If it can't hold 74,000, don't hold on; reduce long positions and reassess at a lower level.
Third, position size. Now is not the time for heavy positions.
Before the macro boot drops, any heavy position is a gamble. You're not betting on direction, but on the Fed's wording.
Three variables ranked by importance: Fed > US Treasury yields > CLARITY Act.
The bill is noise; the Fed is the signal.
Stop obsessing over the Senate vote results. What really determines your account's profit or loss this week are the few words coming from Powell's mouth early tomorrow morning.
$BTC $ETH $SOL 🚨 Cathie Wood reduces holdings early!
On the eve of the critical vote on the CLARITY Act in the U.S. Senate, ARK Invest reduced about $65 million in crypto-related assets.
These include:
🔸 About $40 million in ARKB Bitcoin ETF
🔸 Coinbase
🔸 Circle
🔸 BitMine
🔸 Bullish
Coincidentally, the CLARITY Act vote subsequently failed to advance.
📉 Market signals worth noting:
Institutions are not necessarily "bearish on Bitcoin," but proactively reducing risk exposure before major policy events indicates that funds are guarding against event-driven volatility.
My view:
With CLARITY blocked + the Fed's rate decision approaching, short-term BTC volatility may further increase.
Key points to watch next:
👉 BTC support near $76,000
👉 Short liquidity near $79,500
👉 Whether the CLARITY Act will be renegotiated
⚠️ The key is not to follow who is selling, but to observe large capital position changes before and after major events. Early this morning, the procedural vote on the US Senate's CLARITY Act stalled at 49:50.
The passing threshold is 60 votes. It fell short by a full 10 votes.
Bitcoin instantly dropped below $75,000, Coinbase plummeted 10%, Circle fell over 11%, and Strategy dropped 5.3%.
The entire crypto sector evaporated hundreds of billions of dollars overnight.
But interestingly—no one dared to say it was "completely dead."
Republican Senator Ted Cruz quoted a movie line:
"In The Princess Bride, there's a line: there's a big difference between 'dead' and 'mostly dead.' I hope it can come back to life."
In plain terms: it’s not flatlined yet, but the ICU lights are already on.
So where exactly is it stuck?
On the surface, it’s the vote count—not enough votes. Republicans have 53 seats and need at least 7 Democrats to defect, but didn’t get a single one.
But the real reason is more painful than the vote count.
Ethics provisions.
Simply put: can the Trump family simultaneously set crypto policy and profit from crypto?
Democratic Senator Warren fired shots before the vote—she said this bill would "tear a huge loophole" in nearly a century of securities law, allowing the Trump family to continue profiting through World Liberty Financial, and the newly added ethics provisions are just a "small fig leaf."
On the Republican side? They have accepted about 95% of the Democrats' amendment requests, and Trump himself agreed to transfer crypto assets into a blind trust.
But it still wasn’t enough.
Some Democrats privately admitted "it was almost done," but the Republican leadership shut down the negotiation window at the last moment before the vote.
Think about it—it’s not that they couldn’t reach an agreement, they just didn’t want to before the election.
Because November is the midterm election.
Political calculations trumped everything. Warren wants to use Trump’s crypto business as a target to win votes, and Republicans don’t want to give Democrats political ammunition before the election.
The crypto industry has become the "corpse" lying on the ground while the two parties fight.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse posted on X after the vote:
"That cut really hurts."
He also said something harsher: "The anti-crypto army in the Democratic Party has put politics above good policy."
Believe it or not, if someone else said this—it means the crypto industry itself is also being politicized.
Is there still hope?
Senator John Kennedy said—the bill isn’t dead yet; it can be pushed again during the "lame duck session."
What’s a lame duck session? It’s the transition period after the election but before the new Congress takes office. Outgoing members still hold their seats and their words still count. Pushing a bill then avoids fear of election retaliation.
This is the last window.
But the problem is—after the election, the congressional landscape could change drastically.
If Democrats take the Senate, the CLARITY Act goes straight into the coffin—not "mostly dead," but "truly dead."
Even if Republicans keep the majority, the lame duck session still has budget bills to pass, personnel appointments to approve, and the defense authorization act to review—no one can say where the CLARITY Act will rank.
Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone poured cold water: "Don’t expect the lame duck session to quickly fix this; the chances aren’t high."
White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt was even harsher:
"The cost of today’s vote may only be truly understood years from now. But one thing is certain—the future standards of global financial markets may no longer be set in Washington and New York, but in Brussels and Beijing."
So what’s the current status?
The bill isn’t dead. It’s just paralyzed, lying in the Senate hallway waiting for a stretcher.
The lame duck session is the last lifeboat. But whether there’s a seat on that lifeboat depends on the November election results.
And whether the lifeboat can depart on time depends on whether Congress is willing to spend less time talking and more time doing.
In Washington, the scarcest resource has never been votes—it’s willingness.
$BTC $ETH $SOL $XAU The position of gold is still quite unpleasant, consolidating below the neckline, indicating that the main market funds' intentions are not very clear right now, but the probability of a downward spike is still quite high. Especially around 4330, which corresponds exactly to the low point of the early August pullback, forming a large accumulation of chips. Once it breaks below, the path downward will be very smooth.120,000 liquidations, $670 million evaporated.
This wave early this morning was indeed tough.
The Senate voted 49 in favor and 50 against, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to advance the CLARITY Act.
$BTC BTC briefly fell below $75,000, and crypto-related stocks like Coinbase and Circle also dropped significantly.
So the first reaction in the group chat was basically the same:
"It's over, regulation is getting stricter again."
But I found an interesting perspective from Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse:
If the technology is better, faster, and stronger, it will eventually be adopted by the market.
Translated into plain language, this means:
One bill failing to pass does not mean the entire crypto industry is finished.
Of course, the short-term pain is real.
Your positions shrinking is real.
Coinbase dropping 10% is real.
Market sentiment being crushed is real.
So telling you "don’t panic" at this moment doesn’t really mean much.
But looking at the bigger picture:
The failure of CLARITY affects the speed of regulatory framework progress, not the sudden invalidation of blockchain technology.
And crypto regulation in the U.S. is not completely stalled now.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong previously stated that regardless of whether CLARITY passes, the SEC and CFTC may continue to advance regulatory clarity through rulemaking.
So I’m more willing to interpret today as:
The regulatory path has encountered political resistance, not that the crypto industry has been sentenced to death.
What’s truly worth watching is what happens next.
If CLARITY is renegotiated and the SEC/CFTC continue to push rules, institutionalization of the crypto industry may still proceed.
But if Congress cannot reach consensus for a long time, regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. will persist longer.
These two outcomes have completely different impacts on the market.
So I won’t simply interpret today’s big bearish candle as:
"Crypto is finished."
Nor will I comfort myself with:
"The bad news is over, it will rise soon."
The market has already told us with price:
In the short term, funds are indeed repricing.
As for whether the long-term story is over?
I think it’s too early to conclude now.
Bills can fail, regulatory paths can change, but where technology and capital ultimately go depends on real users, funds, and applications.
This is why I think this CLARITY vote is truly worth watching.
Do you think this is just a temporary stall in the regulatory process, or has the U.S. crypto narrative really started to shift? #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Chatting a bit with the bros. BTC is currently at 75622, leaning bearish. I know many people are itching to buy the dip.
I totally get that feeling. Every time it drops, I think "this is about it," but it’s always just a bit short. Losing 200,000 U is exactly how it happens—always trying to catch the absolute bottom but ending up buying halfway down the slope.
Now I’ve realized: bottoms aren’t caught by buying in; they’re waited out. When the price hits the 74896 support level and stabilizes, then it’s not too late to act. If it hasn’t reached that point, just watch and resist the urge.
My trading plan: If 74896 holds, lightly go long with 5000 U, stop loss at 74500, target 76500; if it rebounds to 77000-77500, lightly go short, target 74896. Every trade must have a stop loss; no holding losing positions.
Bros, control your hands and wait for the signal. The money to be made won’t be missed by a cent. $BTC #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ $BTC Short Liquidation Delta
SLD at ~4b to the downside suggesting shorts are heavy in the low 76k range.
If Support at 76k holds, bears might be in for a rude awakening.Spot ETFs have seen repeated capital inflows and outflows recently, with inflows on Monday, but overall buying did not keep up with the price surge. There is selling pressure from long-term holders on-chain in the 77,000–80,000 range, which is the main reason for the recent inability to break higher. In the short term, it looks more like a high-level consolidation and digestion; don't expect a sudden surge to 82,000. Be patient and wait for macro factors to materialize; it's more reliable than guessing the direction now. $BTC Finally dropped down, this short position was worth the wait.
Checked this morning, $BTC directly smashed through 75000, bottomed near 74900, now back to 75600 fluctuating.
Why did this drop hit so hard?
Last night the CLARITY Act procedural vote failed 49-50, didn’t get 60 votes, crypto regulatory legislation is stuck again. The market originally expected this bill to provide clear rules, but hopes were dashed, sentiment immediately turned sour.
On top of that, the Fed meets today, the market is almost certain of a 25 basis point rate hike. The 10-year US Treasury yield surged to 5.04%, the first time since November 2023. Money is flowing into Treasuries, crypto as a non-yield asset is being dumped directly. After breaking the 77000 support, about 98 million long positions were liquidated, triggering a chain sell-off.
Short on the rebound, resistance at 76200-76500, support at 74900-75100. Unofficial vote count 47:47, unless there’s a large-scale last-minute vote change, this hurdle is hard to pass.
I’m holding my short positions, no rush to close. Before the outcome is certain, I won’t say it’s a sure win, nor will I chase more shorts.
Next focus is one level: can BTC hold 75000? If it breaks, bearish sentiment continues to ferment; if it recovers, watch out for short covering.
The market always votes before the news.
Brothers, did this short position bring you profits?Short positions worth $5 billion are pressing down, yet the shorts have already lost $212 million.
Currently, the total position size is $9.468 billion, with long positions at $4.426 billion and short positions at $5.043 billion, clearly showing a heavier short position.
But what really deserves attention is the profit and loss:
Long positions have an unrealized profit of $192 million,
Short positions have an unrealized loss of $212 million.
In other words, although the short capital size is larger, it is currently the shorts who are losing money. Looking at the funding fees, longs pay $43.75 million, shorts receive $70.21 million. The current market situation is quite interesting: heavy short positions, funding fees still being earned, but the overall account is in a loss state.
If the market continues downward, shorts will maintain the initiative;
But if there is a sudden rebound, the $5 billion level short positions could become fuel for the rise. At this position, which side do you think is more likely to experience a stampede next? $BTC $ETH #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Brothers, before the market opens today, I actually feel it won't go straight one-sided; more likely it will be weak oscillation plus repeated scanning before the news.
From the K-line structure, after continuous drops earlier, there has been some support, but the rebound strength is still insufficient, indicating that the bulls are only defending the market temporarily and haven't truly reversed the trend. For $BTC, if it continues to be suppressed in the early session, the key is whether it can hold around 75,000; for $ETH, watch the 2350–2400 range.
On the news front, the biggest variable today is the FOMC. The market's expectation for a 25bp rate hike is already very high, even reaching about 90%, so the rate hike itself has been priced in quite a bit in advance. Meanwhile, the US Treasury yield breaking above 5%, high oil prices, and pressure on US stocks will make pre-market funds more cautious.
Therefore, I personally lean towards: weak oscillation in the early session, possibly with slight recovery, but upward moves are likely to encounter selling pressure; only if BTC retakes above 77,000 and ETH stabilizes between 2400–2450 does it indicate buying is returning. Conversely, if it breaks lower again with increased volume, don't treat it as a normal shakeout; it means the market is still pricing in hawkish expectations ahead of time.
In short, the most important thing before the market opens today is not to guess the rise or fall, but to see if the K-line can stop falling. Funds will definitely be cautious before the FOMC, and the real big direction will most likely be left to tonight's news release.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #CLARITY投票前分歧未解 #10年期美债收益率突破5% BTC fell below $76,000, ETH fell even further, altcoins collectively pulled back, and many people's first reaction was: "Is the bull market over?" But today, my thinking is exactly the opposite: real major rallies always wash people in panic. First, why did it drop today? Last night, the US Senate failed to push forward a crypto regulatory bill, disappointing market expectations, and all funds were waiting for tonight's Fed rate meeting, putting risk assets under collective pressure, so Bitcoin, Ethereum, SOL, and SUI almost all fell in unison. This isn't about any single coin having problems, but rather the overall cooling of market sentiment. However, I think everyone should pay more attention to three signals. First, BTC did not experience a panic stomping. During the decline, many bulls were forced to liquidate, but BTC remained near key support zones and did not crash with heavy volume like in a bear market. This shows that some are selling, others are buying. Second, ETH falling more than BTC isn't necessarily a bad thing. In the middle and later stages of each bull market, ETH's volatility usually amplifies. When it drops, it's harder than BTC; when it rises, it's often even fiercer. If funds flow back into risky assets later, ETH may once again become the focus of capital. Third, and what I care about most: SUI and SOL. I've always held SUI and kept an eye on SOL. These two ecosystems have had real users and on-chain activity this year, not just storytelling. During major drops, these are often the main focus of capital observation. Today, I didn't chase the rally or panic sell. Instead, I rewrote my own bull market chronicles