Orbit Post Sitemap

Guys, lately, seeing so much in this market really makes it easy to have schizophrenia. #标普收盘再创新高, the 8,000-point level is expected to heat up On one side, the S&P keeps hitting new highs, with Wall Street shouting for 8,000 points; On the other, $BTC repeatedly rubs around $63,000, and spot trading volume has fallen back to 2019 levels. #CPI与PPI同步降温, the rate hike divide widened There is plenty of good news—both CPI and PPI have cooled, the Middle East situation has temporarily eased, and spot ETFs have seen continuous net inflows—but prices have remained completely unchanged. Why? Because what the market lacks isn't good news, but new capital willing to pay to take over. Looking back, this bull market has now split into two distinct paths: One is $BTC and $ETH, steadily advancing with institutional funds and compliance expectations; The other is that most altcoins rely on narrative and sentiment, rising quickly and falling faster. Let's review the points—the points I've repeatedly stated over the past two days are actually quite clear: First, Bitcoin is currently the main switch. If it holds 62,800, it can still be played; if it falls below 62,200, the next target is 62,200. Second, don't stumble on the truths even old retail investors understand—signals like chasing highs always get trapped, holding orders guarantees a break, and bottom-fishing signals. Third, geopolitical risks and macroeconomic uncertainties have yet to subside. The oil price transmission chain in the Strait of Hormuz and internal divisions among the Federal Reserve could deliver a blow to the market at any moment. #霍尔木兹通航谈判未果, pressure from the US and Iran escalates Ultimately, the core strategy now boils down to four words: conserve your bullets. Don't bet on direction during volatility, and don't act until key positions. The market will never close; wait until the trend is confirmed before entering—that's better than anything else. Only those who can endure loneliness deserve to enjoy a big feast.📌Tình hình Vĩ mô ra sao 🏛 1. Báo cáo Kinh tế Mỹ và Kỳ vọng Lãi suất FED - Chuỗi dữ liệu kinh tế Mỹ bao gồm chỉ số giá tiêu dùng CPI (3.4%), chỉ số giá sản xuất PPI (không đổi ở mức 0.0% MoM, hạ nhiệt về 4.7% YoY) kết hợp với báo cáo doanh số bán lẻ công bố hôm nay đang củng cố kịch bản hạ nhiệt lạm phát một cách bền vững. Chi tiết xem tại Retail Sales and Core Retail Sales Economic Data. - Tỷ lệ dự báo Cục Dự trữ Liên bang Mỹ (FED) giữ nguyên mức lãi suất trong kỳ họp tháng 9 tiếp tục neo ở $BTC Bleeding, $ETH rising against the trend, institutional funds have diverged Signals worth noting in the crypto market: BTC-ETFs continue to flow out, ETH-ETFs have seen net inflows against the trend. Under the same macro environment, institutions' attitudes toward the two major giants have already diverged. Yesterday, BTC ETFs saw a net outflow of $61.1 million, with funds withdrawing for three consecutive days; ETH-ETF saw a net inflow of $7.4 million, with all the increments coming from BlackRock ETHA, which was redeemed and subscribed at the same time. Since the beginning of the year, BTC ETFs have seen a cumulative net outflow of $4.55 billion, while ETH has seen a net outflow of $891.5 million, but ETH has recently stabilized significantly. Fidelity's ETH staking application is a key catalyst. Fidelity plans to add staking features to its ETH ETF (FETH, with a scale of $898 million), and institutional demand for ETH staking yields is rising rapidly. Traditional finance is also starting to take sides: leading Italian banks cut 99% of their long BTC ETF positions and tripled their staked ETH; Bit Digital pledged 105.6 million ETH to Galaxy. The direction is clear: institutions are selling BTC allocation and entering the market to position yield-bearing ETH. The market also confirmed: in 24 hours, ETH rose 0.57%, BTC fell 1.3%. ETH's short-term correlation with the S&P 500 turned negative; this round of strength is an independent trend rather than following the broader market rally. BTC fell 1.50%, ETH dropped 1.10%, SOL fell 0.20%; But in the morning, $EDEN surged 48.17%, and $AEON also rose 20.08%. For the bulls, this kind of market is the easiest to deceive: mainstream coins are cooling down, while a few smaller coins are stubbornly creating the feeling that the bull market is back. I don't see it as the knockoff season. $EDEN is 28 points behind the second place, indicating that capital hasn't spread out widely, but is just clustering in a few themes. The real knockoff market should be when the top picks up and mid-tier is also picked up; Right now, it's more like capital is moving to another place. What's even more troublesome is that $ACU, which rose 32.50% yesterday, has already fallen 8.17% this morning. Those chasing the hot topic yesterday may still be unprepared today before the next batch of hot topics has changed. My judgment is straightforward: tonight you can watch the heat, but don't mistake a local surge for a broader market strengthening. As long as BTC and ETH continue to weaken, floating gains on the gainers list could easily turn into cash-out prices. Brothers, do you think this is the beginning of the altcoin rotation, or the last round of bullish inducement before the mainstream coin declines? #现货ETF资金分化, BTC selling pressure still #美光暴跌后: Is it the bottom or halfway up? A major compliance reshuffle is coming! Binance restricts HTX and EXMO capital flows, accelerating exchange elimination rounds Planet Daily: Major industry news has arrived! Binance officially announced that starting August 23, it will restrict fund transactions with 11 platforms including HTX, EXMO, and ABCeX. Not only will direct transfers be intercepted, but on-chain traceability technology is continuously being upgraded. Relying on intermediary wallets to bypass transfer funds can also trigger compliance review. Once forced operations are carried out, the relevant accounts will enter risk screening stages, and in severe cases, account functions will be restricted. Many people still hold onto wishful thinking: multi-level address transfers can conceal the source of funds. In reality, it's important to recognize that on-chain tracking tools are already very mature, with capital flow trajectories preserved permanently—there is no simple way to "launder" them. The essence of this move is not platform competition, but rather a self-protection effort by leading exchanges to proactively cut risk entities and avoid huge compliance penalties amid tightening global regulations and international sanctions. HTX's inclusion in the EU and UK sanctions lists was the core trigger for this incident. The industry compliance elimination competition has officially begun. ⚠️ This is the most important practical reminder for all crypto enthusiasts If you currently have assets held on the relevant exchanges on the list, prioritize planning your fund withdrawal plan. Don't be tempted by high-interest wealth management on small exchanges or small profits from cross-exchange transfers. If the platform continues to face regulatory pressure, withdrawal channels may become uncertain at any time, making principal safety far more important than short-term returns. 📈 Industry long-term trend: capital is accelerating toward compliance leaders After a round of major cleanups, investors will reassess the core value of exchanges: license reserves, global compliance layout, and risk control systems, which have become the bottom line for survival. A horizontal comparison clearly shows the divergence: OKX is not listed among the risk-related parties. For many years, it has continuously developed compliance licenses in multiple regions worldwide, steadily advancing MiCA and Middle East qualification filings. Many once criticized the conservative pace of development, but in today's context, a steady and compliant approach is the biggest moat for navigating regulatory storms. Market logic is then transmitted to platform tokens: platform token valuation frameworks are being reshaped. In the future, relying solely on trading fee dividends will no longer be enough; exchange security and compliance tolerance will become key pricing factors. The compliance advantages continue to be realized, providing fundamental support for $OKB in the medium to long term. The entire industry is at a turning point. The era of wild growth has completely ended, regulatory frameworks continue to tighten, and exchanges lacking compliance qualifications and facing many risks have seen their survival space shrink. As the waves sift through the sand, the demand for capital avoidance is heating up, continuously flowing to leading platforms with standardized risk control and clear compliance paths. The market will continue to track two major signals: 1. Whether more leading exchanges will follow up and introduce capital isolation risk control policies; 2. Changes in user withdrawals and fund outflows from small and medium-sized gray exchanges, and observe the pace of fund migration. As the tide recedes, compliance is the long-term passport to survival. Choose a secure platform for trading, then discuss seeking profits. #OKB #交易所合规 #加密行业监管七月的通胀钻杆在美元这座百层大楼的承重墙上钻出两道内斜裂纹——CPI从3.5退到3.4，PPI从5.5塌缩到4.7，连核心结构都在向地基方向偏移。 作为常年驻场的建筑设计师，我看数据从不看大堂粉刷。CPI、PPI只是贴在外立面的大理石薄板，真正决定这栋楼还能否继续加盖的，是底下那根深埋岩层的地梁——美联储的利率调度。7月PPI月率低于概算，失业金申领人数升到209,000，这分明是工地传来的钢筋受力报告：支撑层出现了松弛，理论上不必再向混凝土里猛灌速凝剂（加息）。 但别急着拆脚手架。监理方总部分裂了。Hammack攥着力矩扳手说必须继续灌浆；Barkin端着水准仪说现有预应力已足够让承重墙闭嘴。这种设计分歧比数据本身更致命——一座超高层，总工与分包对承载力算法各执一词，你让塔吊怎么定位？钢构怎么焊接？九月的施工进度表自然成了暴风里的防水布，每三小时改一次定位线。 美元、美债收益率、黄金和BTC，本质是同一场结构试验里的四个测点。美元是旧核心筒，美债收益率是外框位移传感器，黄金是抗压试块，而BTC——那个总被老派工程师戏称为“装配式玩具”的新结构，反而在潮气渗进筏板时，显出模块化底座的自由度。通胀降温意味着旧楼的附加荷载在减轻，资金有了转身走向新工地的胆量；但美联储分裂意味着总监理办公室还在拉白布吵架，谁也不敢保证下一版蓝图是加密核心筒还是卸载桁架。 至于那些把白皮书当设计图、把社区叙事当穹顶的项目，我见得够多了。真正扛住风雨的不是效果图，是桩基入岩深度。$XMU的市场联动，就好像外立面玻璃幕墙反射着邻近工地的火光——好看，但要看火源是在几层楼板燃烧。 鹰派鸽派打起来时，我连安全网都懒得换。因为结构安全的从来不是最新快照，而是整套冗余度。九月定价每晃一次，都是砖缝在提醒你：混凝土还没到28天龄期，谁敢在这时候签验收记录？ 这栋楼的地基仍在嗡嗡作响，而我已收起图纸——没人能对同时标出两个标高控制点的文件验算通过。#CPIPPIEaseFedSplit Inflation data continues to cool, regulatory frameworks are undergoing key votes, and traditional finance is accelerating its embrace of crypto assets—these forces are converging at the same timeframe, shifting market sentiment from caution to tentative optimism. US July CPI fell from 3.5% to 3.4%, and core inflation also dropped from 2.6% to 2.5%. Although the increase is not dramatic, the direction is clear enough: the pressure for short-term Fed rate hikes is visibly easing. For risk assets, it's like a machine running under constant high pressure suddenly loosening a bolt, and BTC and ETH, which are most sensitive to liquidity, naturally feel the warmth first. The market's biggest fear is not that prices won't rise, but that they don't know when they will catch their breath. At least now, expectations have provided a breathing room. What truly deserves attention is the upcoming vote on the new crypto regulatory framework by the U.S. SEC. The "Regulation Crypto" discussed this time may cover areas such as establishing dedicated management systems for crypto projects, providing compliance channels for token issuance, promoting token securitization, and reducing regulatory uncertainty. If implemented, it would be one of the most significant crypto regulatory reforms in the U.S. in recent years. The emotional significance is especially significant—in recent years, the biggest fear in the crypto industry has not been price volatility, but "not knowing when any rule might suddenly crush us." Now that signals of institutionalization are beginning to emerge, institutional funds have the confidence to truly sit down and discuss long-term allocation. Meanwhile, the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) reaffirmed its support for issuing banking licenses to crypto companies#CPI与PPI同步降温, rate hike divergences widen, damn! Inflation is cooling down, oil prices are easing, and US stocks are hitting new highs, yet Bitcoin and Ethereum haven't made a single splash. This isn't just about unfulfilled good news; the crypto world can't accept any good news right now. In July, CPI fell to 3.4%, with core pressure at 2.5%; The PPI was flat month-on-month, and year-on-year was also weaker than expected. According to textbook logic, once the pressure on rate hikes eases, risk assets should at least jump a little. As a result, BTC surged to around 64,000 and was immediately pushed back, and ETH couldn't even hold above 1900. US stocks have hit record highs, gold is holding flat at high levels, oil prices have loosened but not showing strength, yet in the crypto world, only some people are taking the opportunity to sell off. Some views on X suggest: with soft PPI and soft CPI for two consecutive days, Bitcoin hasn't picked up even a bit, volatility has disappeared, data has done what needed to be done, but demand hasn't shown up at all. CryptoQuant also thinks: spot trading is lukewarm, Coinbase's premium has been negative for a long time, US investors aren't buying seriously, and ETF liquidity flows are rock soft. Leveraged long positions are piled up, spot positions are unsubscribed, and when good news arrives, it becomes a trigger for liquidation. This is a typical case of selling news—not because the data is poor, but because everyone has already digested the cooldown, and what's left is the selling pressure at the top as high as a mountain. The Fed is still fighting internally; some are calling for rate hikes, others say it's tight enough. The market simply couldn't be bothered to listen; interest rate contracts had already shifted toward rate cuts, and U.S. Treasury yields fell across the board. But Bitcoin's pricing is a bit muchAt the close of U.S. stocks on August 13, all three major indices closed higher. The S&P 500 rose 0.65% to close at 7,798.99, setting a new all-time closing high, marking its 27th closing record this year; the Nasdaq rose 0.81%, and the Dow Jones closed up 0.13%. This round of upward movement is mainly driven by three main lines: First, PPI data cooled, and expectations for rate hikes declined. The US July PPI was flat month-on-month, below market expectations, easing concerns over a rate hike in September. US Treasury yields fell, which benefited equity asset valuation recovery. Second, the AI and semiconductor sectors continued their strong performance. SanDisk surged about 13.7%, Micron rose 4.2%, leading tech stocks like Microsoft and Meta also strengthened, and AI infrastructure and memory chips remained the core drivers of US stock market gains. Third, earnings expectations remain strong. Currently, S&P 500 component stocks have generally performed well in earnings reports, with capital still holding high expectations for corporate earnings and AI capital expenditure. #标普收盘再创新高, the 8,000-point level is expected to heat up ⚠️ But the risks are equally important and cannot be ignored Currently, the market is driven by expectations of interest rate cuts combined with AI profit stories, continuously pushing the index to new highs, with market valuations already in a relatively high range. Additionally, oil prices strengthened again on August 14, and the Middle East situation and geopolitical conflicts in the Strait of Hormuz could potentially drive up inflation. If oil prices continue to rise, the core logic of "if inflation falls→ the Fed is dovish→ U.S. stocks will rise" will be shaken. Risk Warning: Only sharing ideas, not investment advice, no inappropriate guidance, comply with community conventions! $BTC $ETH $SNDK 本次美国30年期国债拍卖投标倍数回落至2.39倍，中标收益率来到5.216%，刷新2001年以来新高，对比7月5.06%的数据，长期融资成本出现明显上行。 不过要区分清楚，2.39倍并不等同于需求崩塌。前六次拍卖的平均投标倍数大约2.43倍，本次仅仅小幅低于均值；核心信号是市场只有在更高收益率的条件下，才愿意承接海量长债供给。 这件事为什么举足轻重？ 第一，财政压力抬升期限溢价。美国政府债务规模逼近40万亿美元，投资者索要更高收益，用来对冲长期通胀与财政层面的不确定性。 第二，长端美债走势正在跳出降息叙事。即便通胀近期有所降温，30年期收益率依旧居高不下，眼下市场定价的不单单是美联储降息节奏，还有财政赤字、巨量发债供给与通胀反弹隐患。 第三，收益率曲线陡峭化，利空风险资产。高位长端利率抬高权益资产估值折现率，高估值科技股承压最为明显，同时企业融资开销也会随之增加。 风险提示：仅分享思路，不构成投资建议，无不良引导，遵守社区公约！$BTC $ETH $SNDK #标普收盘再创新高，8000点预期升温 $SPCX Please, there is still a large batch of unlocks on 8.20. Will the funds risk pushing it up only to let retail investors and the unlocks dump together? I support spacex reaching 200, 300, 800 in the future, but it definitely won't skyrocket in just one week! This week it closes at 137-138, next week it will drift down near the IPO price or even return to around 120 from the last unlock. Waiting for the unlocks to finish before choosing a direction is the logic of big money.🔻 SHORT $ETH NOW eth's getting sold every hour, lower highs since 1,897 and now sitting right on 1,863 with barely any bounce left. sellers not backing off. Entry: CMP (1,865) TP1: 1,858 TP2: 1,850 TP3: 1,840 TP4: 1,828 SL: 1,890 Trade $ETH here 👇 watching with this: $BTC losing steam near highs, $SOL fading below its highs, $XRP just chopping, $LINK bleeding with majors, $SUI the only one holding strength. eth cracks 1,863 clean and the board follows, don't wanna be late.Solana’s DeFi Lead Is Holding — But Activity Is Cooling $SOL Solana remains one of the most important networks in the DeFi market, but the latest data shows a more complicated picture. Galaxy Research’s Q2 analysis found that Solana maintained the #1 position in global spot DEX volume for the seventh consecutive quarter. However, quarterly spot DEX volume fell 45%, while network fees declined 44% and TVL dropped 14%. That divergence matters. Solana is still attracting significant on-chain activity, but the decline in trading volume suggests that market participation has cooled from previous peaks. The key question is whether this is simply a cyclical slowdown or evidence of weaker speculative demand. There is another side to the story. Solana’s real-world asset (RWA) supply crossed 3 billion USD in June, showing that activity is gradually expanding beyond traditional DeFi trading. Institutional interest is also developing. Bitwise is exploring a way to tokenize its Solana staking ETF shares on-chain, potentially connecting traditional investment products with blockchain infrastructure. For SOL, the next signal is not simply price. DEX volume, TVL, stablecoin liquidity, RWA growth and institutional adoption will reveal whether Solana’s ecosystem is becoming more durable—or merely moving through another speculative cycle. #Solana #SOL #DeFi #Crypto #RWA #MarketAnalysis存储芯片行业再现周期转折信号。SanDisk在投资者日发布长期业绩指引，直接展望至2030年，预计期内可实现中高双位数营收增长，毛利率目标高达80%，并计划将经营现金流用于股票回购及股东分红。指引发布后，SanDisk股价单日上涨近20%，美光（Micron）、SK海力士（Hynix）等存储厂商股价同步走强。 这份指引的背后，是存储行业需求结构正在发生根本性变化。SanDisk管理层披露，目前已与8家客户签署长期供货合同，截至2028年的约三分之二产能已被提前锁定。与此前周期中存储厂商主动扩产、最终引发价格崩盘的格局不同，本轮产能预订主要由云服务提供商推动，买家担忧未来闪存供应趋紧，选择提前锁定货源，以防产能分配不足。 市场参与者认为，这一轮存储行情的上涨核心已非单一季度的盈利改善，而是市场对AI算力扩张将加速耗尽存储产能的预期。此前存储厂商集体扩产导致供需失衡的历史叙事正在被扭转，下游客户的提前锁单行为使得供给侧的可预见性显著增强。 存储周期定价逻辑正从厂商主导的产能竞赛，转向由AI需求牵引的长期合约锁定，这一结构性变化值得持续跟踪。 #存储芯片 #AI #Crypto美国加密监管两条路同时堵死了。 CLARITY法案在8月休会前没推进，全院表决已正式推迟到9月。参议院多数党领袖图恩确认，等9月14日议员复会后再走流程。Polymarket上该法案2026年通过的概率已从5月初的70%以上跌到14%左右。民主党要求加严格伦理条款，涉及特朗普家族约14亿美元加密业务。共和党53席，法案需要60票，至少7名民主党人倒戈，目前公开支持推进的只有2人。如果9月15日前还没实质进展，进入中期选举季基本就凉了。 SEC的路也断了。原定8月15日召开Reg Crypto规则提案会议，讨论加密资产发行豁免框架。但8月14日晚间，SEC以“不可预见的日程问题”为由，在最后一刻取消了会议，新日期未公布。这项规则被视为SEC在数字资产领域的首次重大规则制定尝试。加密行业的两条监管路径，行政规则制定与立法推进，当前均陷入停滞。#闪迪投资者日后股价大涨，长期目标待验证 AMAT Financial Report Analysis: Core Beneficiary of Semiconductor Equipment Applied Materials (AMAT) is a global leader in semiconductor process equipment, specializing in materials engineering technology. It mainly provides key machines such as thin film deposition, chemical mechanical grinding, etching, and advanced packaging, along with long-term after-sales service and display equipment. Its technology is deeply rooted in chip manufacturing and is an indispensable part of driving the development of AI, advanced wafers, and advanced computing 📊 Financial report data AMAT FY2026 Q3 revenue reached $9.115 billion, a year-on-year increase of 24.8%, setting a new historical high Among them: . Semiconductor system revenue was $7.04 billion, up 26.5% year-over-year ． Non-GAAP gross margin 50.4% ． Non-GAAP operating margin: 34.0% ． Non-GAAP EPS of $3.50, up 41.1% year-over-year .Free cash flow reached $2.33 billion Revenue and profitability are improving simultaneously. While revenue grows, gross margin surpasses 50%, and operating profit margin reaches 34%. This means AI, advanced processes, and advanced packaging bring not only more orders but potentially higher-value equipment combinations The more AI develops, the more important AMAT becomes As AI-driven architectures shift from 2D plane miniaturization to 3D three-dimensional stacking and atomic-level material control, wafer manufacturing's dependence on deposition, grinding, etching, and thin film engineering has increased exponentially. In plain language, the more advanced the chip, the more complex the materials engineering it needs to handle—this is precisely AMAT's strength and powerful moat Three growth points worth watching (mostly new technologies, skipping if not interested, basically meaning that as chips upgrade, device demand will also increase) 1️⃣ GAA: The 2nm generation brings more device demand GAA is a brand-new three-dimensional transistor structure. TSMC, Samsung, and Intel are gradually entering the GAA era, shifting from FinFET to GAA. This is not just about changing the transistor structure, but about adding extensive deposition, selective etching, epitaxial processes, and other processes, resulting in an advanced chip requiring more AMAT equipment 2️⃣ BSPDN: Further upgrades process complexity BSPDN introduces a new chip routing architecture to solve the internal issues of "line knotting" and "power loss." This also increases the demand for wafer thinning, CMP, etching, deposition, and metallization, meaning the equipment value created by a single wafer is higher 3️⃣ HBM+ Advanced Packaging: AI memory is creating new device demands AI GPUs not only require more advanced logic chips but also large amounts of HBM. HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) is a memory technology designed specifically for high-performance computing, serving as the key core supporting ChatGPT, large language models (LLMs), and AI chips HBM continues to upgrade, and packaging complexity keeps increasing, causing the semiconductor equipment market to extend from wafer manufacturing to advanced packaging ⚠️AMAT risk (1) The Chinese market China has been a very important market for AMAT in recent years, but export controls and the normalization of expanded production of mature Chinese processes may have cooled this demand. (2) Semiconductor capital expenditure cycle AMAT is still essentially a semiconductor equipment company. If memory manufacturers cut CapEx, equipment orders may still be affected, so the memory cycle will still be affected. If they can propose a business model like SanDisk that transcends the cycle, this concern might be dispelled (3) Slightly higher valuation The company's fundamentals are strong, but the market is already aware of this, so when the market offers a high P/E ratio, it means it must continue to deliver high growth in the future 💡 Investment logic AMAT has a long-term industry trend: chips are becoming increasingly complex→ process steps are increasing→ more equipment is needed per wafer, → equipment vendors are improving Content per Wafer The aforementioned new technologies GAA, BSPDN, HBM, and 3D packaging are all driving this forward. Therefore, if AI infrastructure is described as a long-term arms race, then AMAT is selling military equipment. In the short term, valuation and capital expenditure cycles are needed; in the long term, AI, advanced processes, and advanced packaging bring increased equipment content For me, AMAT is still a good company, still standing at the AI trend, waiting for the market to slash valuations and offer better points to get on board. On 9/8, there's their investor day, hoping they can surprise us with $AMAT $XAMAT just like SanDisk Newly opened large positions on-chain: swing traders are almost fully invested in SKHX This swing address rarely pushes a single position close to its own equity. On SKHX, he just opened a $1.24M long position, while his account equity was about $1.25M. 287 transactions gradually spread in, with an average price of 1,189.82. From the first to the last, the gap spanned 25 minutes, not an instantaneous sweep. Currently, this address does not have a position in the same direction; this is a new position. Address profile: High CopyScore candidate, both long and short, 217 historical records, win rate 67.9%, PnL +$642.31K. What matters to watch is not the direction, but whether the company will continue to increase its position after opening a position close to full, or reduce it at the slightest price fluctuation. If you like my sharing, please give me a followThe monthly opening has already broken below the threshold, $BTC short-term structure remains weak. Combining current contract, spot CVD, and position data, I still prefer to first sweep the lower liquidity at the price level. What's interesting now is: Contract CVD continues to fall, indicating active selling is still entering the market; Spot CVD is rising, but prices remain unruffled, indicating that although there is spot support below, selling pressure is stronger above, and spot buyers have not yet regained pricing power. At the same time, prices are falling and open interest is rising, and the ratio of long-short positions is noticeably higher. This means the market may have accumulated many new long positions, and last week's low below is a set of equal-low points, combined with the 0.5 retracement level and a concentration of liquidations, making it easy for the price to seek liquidity. So for now, I lean more to: First, scan last week's low and the liquidation zone below, then observe if it can recover quickly. If after clearing the lows there is a clear release of OI, prices return to last week's lows, contract CVD continues to hit new lows but no longer hits new lows, and spot CVD remains strong, then a high-quality rebound may occur here. But if, after falling below the current level, price, open interest, and contract CVD continue to fall in tandem, and even spot CVD starts to weaken, it won't just be a liquidity sweep—it will result in a failed hold, and the market may continue to decline. Having a target below doesn't mean you can buy long with your eyes closed. Rather than guessing the lowest point, I'd rather wait for the market to wash away the bulls first, then see if it can pull back.July's CPI year-on-year was 3.4%, and core CPI was 2.5%, all of which met expectations. PPI was even stronger, with a year-on-year increase of 4.7%, the lowest since March, and a month-on-month drop of 0.2%. Logically, it's a double benefit, right? The probability of a rate hike in September plummeted from 55% a week ago to 35%. But $BTC is still hovering around 63,300, down 1.45% for the week, showing no respect at all. #CPI与PPI同步降温, rate hike divergences widened, and the market entered a true "positive immunity" state. CPI met expectations, PPI cooled more than expected, and the probability of rate hikes plunged by 20 percentage points—this would have been a long time ago. But BTC couldn't even touch 64,000, failed to reach 64,000 twice, and pushed back to the resistance zone between 63,900 and 64,000 twice. Even more striking is that spot daily trading volume fell to the 64,000 resistance zone and was rebounded. Even more striking is that daily spot trading volume dropped to 1.19 billion, the lowest since 2019. The peak in February was $14.7 billion. What does this mean? No one is buying, and no one is in a hurry to sell—liquidity is drying up. But US stocks have risen. The S&P 500 rose 0.65%, hitting a record high, the Nasdaq gained 0.81%, and Tesla gained 3.5%. Risk appetite is improving, but BTC has not kept pace at all. This indicates that funds are moving toward traditional risk assets, and crypto is currently not on the allocation list. ETFs are also running—BTC ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive days, with a single-day outflow of 125.4M on August 13, and a cumulative net outflow this week$CAP Guys, just after the APR roller coaster was sent, I caught a familiar scent again on CAPUSDT. Let me share my bearish logic—not blindly picking the top: 1. Extremely unstable chip structure: On the daily chart, 0.07484 is a historical high (at least the highest since listing). After hitting this level today, it quickly fell back to 0.07388, with almost no trapped positions above—only profit-taking. Once the bulls start taking profits, the pedaling will be even fiercer than APR. 2. Funding rate signals: In recent days, funding rates have frequently turned positive (long pay), but the proportion of long-short accounts shows a higher proportion of short accounts (only about 0.39). What does this mean? Retail investors are desperately short selling, but prices are still rising—a typical signal of the end of a "short squeeze." Once the bulls are exhausted, there is huge room for a counterattack. 1. New currency + high control = casino. Don't fool yourself with "value investing"—this is pure chip gambling. 2. Don't be intimidated by the 361% increase on the 30th—the crazier the rally, the harder the fall, but always wait for confirmation from the right, don't die at the last big bullish candlestick before dawn. 3. Funding rates are a double-edged sword: If short selling encounters sustained positive rates, you can still collect some "toll fees" daily, but only if you don't get suddenly overwhelmed. Finally, I will use a small position to test shorts on this trade, strictly follow stop-losses, treat profits as extra meals, and losses won't hurt your bones. The market never lacks opportunities; what it lacks are people who live and wait for opportunities.The post-opening performance of U.S. stocks gave the market a clear answer: although inflation + retail this week weakened the September rate hike, it is still far from enough to reverse the situation The good news is that US stocks have not moved into defensive trading driven by recession or stagflation concerns. The bad news is that the probability of a rate hike in September remains stuck at 30%, which is still insufficient to support risk markets. After the US stock market opened, the probability of a rate hike in September in the CME returned to 30%, and both the dollar and bond markets stopped falling and rebounded. Clearly, market confidence in not raising rates in September is still lacking The core factor is that current energy prices remain relatively high. If energy prices rise further, inflation will trigger a rebound in August inflation data. Tonight's retail acceleration will weaken the economy, turning into stagflation, so energy prices are the core factor Second, the July PCE data for August 26, as well as the August employment and inflation data for September, have yet to be released. The market still lacks confidence in Walsh's hawkish policies. To reverse the situation, it will depend on whether subsequent data further consolidate the current combination of weakening inflation + preliminary employment risks + economic weakness. With the release of retail data and the conclusion of this week's macro theme, the market now needs to focus on the impact of the US-Iran situation and energy price trends on the market! Note: The current situation between the US and Iran is not optimistic, and US stocks are likely to experience temporary safe-haven behavior in the second half and near the close. #CPI与PPI同步降温, the rate hike divergence is widening #闪迪投资者日后股价大涨, long-term goals remain to be verified I'm Zhongxian Intelligence Bro. SanDisk (SNDK) investors surged 13+ on Thursday and surged another 4% before trading on Friday, with the market directly repricing "NAND cyclical stocks" into "AI infrastructure stocks." I'm focusing on three things: First, the target for mid-to-high double-digit revenue, 80% gross margin, and 75% operating profit for fiscal years 2028-2030, paired with 94 billion yuan long-term agreement (NBM) to lock volume and price, with half of the cyclical fluctuations being offset by contracts; Second, HBF high-bandwidth flash memory will be sampled in 2027 and monetized in 2028, using capacity and cost to ride on HBM's margins, making the AI inference KV cache narrative viable; Third, 14 billion yuan in new buybacks and 100% excess cash rebates, directly igniting capital sentiment. But don't get carried away in the medium term—80% of gross profit is calculated backward based on contract floor prices. If you really want to see execution: can NBM share climb from over half in 2027 to two-thirds in 2028, can NAND supply tighten until 2028, and are HBF customers really paying money? Short-term pulses are expected gaps; mid-term acceleration requires waiting for subsequent quarterly reports to confirm gross margin and new contracts. Hold trend positions steady, leave swing positions for pullbacks; don't convert all 2030 dreams into current valuations. $SNDK $BTC $ETH Miners stop mining BTC and instead power AI instead—just how profitable is the business behind this? A few months after the Bitcoin halving, a dramatic collective defection occurred within the North American crypto mining community. Those listed mining giants who once fought desperately to buy mining machines and compete on hash rates have recently begun subletting their factories and substations to AI giants like Anthropic and Microsoft, transforming into landlords of high-density AI computing centers. Many people initially don't understand and wonder if mining companies are forced to transform because they can no longer continue mining. But if you look deep into the extreme bottlenecks facing AI computing power in the physical world, you'll find that what mining companies hold is not scrap metal at all, but the most scarce hard currency in the entire AI industry. People often discuss how highly sought-after Nvidia's GPU chips are, but few realize that buying a graphics card is only the first step. In North America, thousands of top-tier graphics cards are connected to the grid, and the biggest enemy is the power grid queue. In today's developed countries in Europe and America, building a new large-scale data center requires a lengthy approval cycle of four to seven years—from land application, environmental assessment, to finally obtaining the approval rights for several hundred megawatts of high-voltage grid access from power companies. Bitcoin mining companies have already built ready-made substations, high-voltage transmission lines, and large-capacity transmission contracts in major energy states like Texas in recent years. For AI giants eager to seize the advantage of large models and can't afford to wait even a second, directly renting existing transformer capacity from mining companies is faster than queuing up for the grid to build data centers themselves. According to industry estimates, mining companies using the same power load to mine Bitcoin face risks of price fluctuations and intense competition, while directly subletting to AI giants for custody can secure ultra-high gross margin fixed contracts of up to ten to fifteen years, adjusted for stable inflation. This stable long-term cash flow has enabled mining companies' valuation models to upgrade from high-risk, cyclical miners to utility giants with scarce infrastructure. This is precisely the most magical reflection of the computing power revolution in the physical world: the intelligent limits humanity pursues in the bit world are ultimately firmly anchored to the power grid access rights in the watt world. --- 💬 Here's a thought-provoking question for those of you watching the tech sector: facing the wave of crypto mining companies transitioning to AI computing power hosting, do you think this will weaken Bitcoin's overall network computing security in the long term, or will it provide healthier cash flow support for miners? Share your thoughts in the comments section. The above content represents only personal perspective sharing and does not constitute any investment advice. DYOR, NFA. #Strategy再卖1690枚BTC, corporate financial pools are diverging 🚨 $SNDK ISN’T JUST ANOTHER AI TRADE ANYMORE — THE THESIS MAY BE CHANGING. SanDisk’s latest figures were already difficult to ignore: 📈 Revenue: $8.97B 📈 Sequential growth: 51% 📈 Gross margin: 84.6% 📈 Data-center business: roughly doubled Yet the stock initially struggled. That reaction reveals what investors were really worried about: Not whether SanDisk can make money — but whether it can keep making money when the storage cycle turns. That’s where Investor Day becomes important. SanDisk is attempting to make the business less dependent on short-term NAND pricing by locking in demand through long-term customer agreements. The company says agreements with 8 customers cover roughly 50% of expected FY2027 shipments and around two-thirds of FY2028 shipments. If those commitments hold, the traditional storage boom-and-bust model could become more predictable. Management is also targeting approximately 80% non-GAAP gross margin and 50% adjusted free-cash-flow margin for FY2028–2030, with plans to return remaining cash to shareholders after required investment. That creates a very different narrative. OLD THESIS: NAND prices rise → profits surge → cycle turns → earnings collapse. NEW THESIS: AI data centers drive structural storage demand → contracts improve visibility → earnings become more resilient. But there’s still a major test ahead. Can margins survive the next NAND downturn? Can those contracts actually stabilize earnings? Can HBF execution match the targets? Those answers will come from future results — not projections. Still, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: AI needs more than compute. It needs storage. Compute makes AI think. Storage gives AI somewhere to remember. 🧠💾 $SNDK #SandiskInvestorDayRally #AIInfraEarningsWatch SanDisk's current trading recommendations! Guys, SanDisk really went all out this time. The latest price is 1619.75, up 5.69%, with a daily low of 1388.86 and a high of 1666.48. From 1416 before Investor Day to today's 1666, the price has surged over 250 points in two days, with a cumulative increase of about 18%. If we count from the low of 1226 after the August 5th earnings report, it has rebounded by more than 440 points, with a cumulative increase of 36%. Let's start with the technical side, where subtle changes are beginning to appear in the market. On the 4-hour chart, the middle Bollinger Band is at 1624, the upper band at 1650, and the lower band at 1599. Price 1619 has broken below the upper Bollinger band at 1650, retreating into the inner Bollinger Band—returning from an extremely strong area to a normal strong zone. SAR reversal signal 1569 is far below — trend confirmation shifts from bearish to bullish. SuperTrend 1601 forms support below. The most noteworthy is the MACD. Fast line at 12.19, slow line at 15.34, energy bar at -6.29—a death cross has formed above the zero line, and bullish momentum is starting to weaken. Compared to yesterday's chart (fast line 35.24, slow line 24.76, energy bar 20.96), bullish momentum has clearly weakened, and a short-term top signal is worth watching for. A death cross above the zero line means the first wave of profit-taking has appeared in the uptrend, not a trend reversal, but short-term correction and repair are indeed needed. Key levels: First resistance above 1640-1650; a breakout at 1666-1680; first support below 1600-1610; a break at 1580-1590, and further down to 1550-1560. What is the market trading behind this candlestick? First, the positive news from Investor Day is being digested. On August 13, Investor Day announced an 80% gross margin target, 100% excess cash return to shareholders, and an HBF roadmap. The market responded positively—surging about 18% in two days. But any positive news has a period of digestion; today's sharp rise and pullback candlestick indicates that short-term profit-taking is exiting. Second, valuations are rapidly recovering. At 1226 after the earnings report, the forward P/E ratio was only 5-6 times. After reaching 1666, valuations have recovered to a relatively reasonable level. Going further requires new catalysts, not just sentiment to keep pushing the market. Third, the medium- to long-term logic remains, but short-term overbought is a fact. 93.9 billion yuan long-term contracts, HBF options, 100% cash rebate — none of these have changed. But the RSI has already entered the overbought zone, prices are far from the Bollinger middle band, and the probability of a short-term correction is rising. Lao Mo said a few words to brothers in both situations. For those with positions: If you have gained 15%-20% in two days, it is recommended to reduce your position by half near 1620-1640, keeping half of your position for further breakouts or setting protective stops. Why? Because the MACD has formed a death cross above the zero axis, and short-term bullish momentum has clearly weakened. This is not a signal of a trend reversal, but it is indeed a sign of short-term correction pressure accumulating. Move the stop-loss up below 1560 to protect profits. Brothers wanting to enter a short position: Chasing at 1620 now is not cost-effective. Wait for a pullback to 1580-1600 and stabilize before buying, stop loss below 1550, target 1640-1666, and if a breakout is at 1680-1700. If the price directly breaks through 1666 with increased volume and holds steady, consider chasing on the right, stop loss below 1620, targeting 1700-1720. Brothers wanting to short: Wait until 1600-1610 is confirmed below before acting, stop loss above 1640, target 1580-1590. Don't go short at 1620 — the trend is bullish, contrarian short positions carry high risk. Lao Mo finally said: SanDisk rose from 1226 to 1666, an increase of 36%. The positive news from investor day has almost been fully absorbed. Next, real performance is needed — whether the 8 long-term contracts can be realized, whether HBF can be implemented, and whether 100% cash rebate can be executed. In the short term, the direction remains bullish, but after a one-sided rally, chasing at this level is better than waiting for a pullback. Did you get a share of SanDisk this time? Let's talk in the comments. If you think Lao Mo is so clear, give a like and follow. When I get to a key position, I'll call you right away. $BTC $ETH $SNDK #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard SEC doves, Congress on summer vacation—U.S. regulatory halts on both fronts, CLARITY Act cools off BTC was trading sideways near $63,000-$64,000, with a full-day fluctuation of less than 2%. XRP was stuck at $1.009, neither moving up nor down. The market was deathly quiet. But beneath the silence, two ticking time bombs pressed the pause button simultaneously. You think regulation is advancing? No, regulation is on summer vacation. Let's start with the first line: the CLARITY Act, which Congress threw into the trash bin of the summer recess. On May 14, the bill passed the Senate Banking Committee by a bipartisan vote of 15 to 9, once making the entire industry believe that "clear regulation" was finally coming. And what was the result? The Senate adjourned for five weeks, postponing the full House vote to September. North Carolina Republican Senator Thom Tillis quoted: "The probability of the bill passing may have dropped by 50%. ” Why push it? The two parties are still arguing—the Democrats are demanding stricter clauses limiting officials' crypto asset interests, especially focusing on the Trump family's ties to certain crypto projects. A bill meant to give the industry "clarity" has become a complete mess first. Negotiations have lasted nearly 11 months, and the bill has been added by 300 pages. 300 pages of "clarity," still clear? The second line: The SEC put the entire industry in a pigeon at the last minute before the meeting. The "Regulation Crypto" public meeting originally scheduled for August 14 (today) was suddenly canceled by the SEC on August 13. The official reason was "unforeseen scheduling issues." What was this meeting supposed to discuss? Creating customized issuance systems for crypto asset investment contracts. Simply put, it opens a compliant "gateway" for crypto startups—they don't have to fully meet the high thresholds of traditional securities issuance and can still raise funds compliantly. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins has consistently made this a priority during his tenure and has promoted so-called "innovation waivers" and "safe harbor" mechanisms. And the result? The meeting was canceled the day before, with a new date yet to be set. Even more outrageous, the third rule: the tokenization innovation exemption was also halted. According to crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett, the SEC's tokenization innovation exemption has been "further delayed." What is the reason? Because Section 10505 of the CLARITY Act regarding tokenization is still being repeatedly tugged at by various parties. Do you understand? With congressional legislation halted, the SEC dared not touch its rulemaking — afraid that if it left first, it would ruin Congress's compromise. Two paths, waiting for each other. Neither goes first. To put it bluntly: U.S. crypto regulation is now a game of "whoever blinks first loses." The CLARITY Act is stuck in Congress—both parties are arguing over whether officials can buy coins. The SEC is stuck at its doorstep—the phrase "scheduling issue" has completely crushed the rulemaking the entire industry has waited a year. Congress says "wait for September," while the SEC says "wait for notification." Can you afford to wait for the projects in your hands that are waiting for regulation to be implemented before they can be compliantly launched? Can your startup teams, waiting for the shelter of a "safe harbor" to catch their breath, afford to wait? Can you afford to wait for the coins in your hand? The current situation is: Legislative advancement—stop. Rulemaking—stop. Tokenized innovation exemption—stop. All three legs were broken. Bitcoin is trading sideways at 63,000, not because the market has no direction—it's because everyone who can give direction is on vacation and procrastinate. Some say it's a "short-term wait." Wake up. This isn't waiting; it's that the difficulty of pushing forward has become so great that neither side dares to move. The CLARITY Act has been going through three months since it passed the committee in May until August, without a full vote. The SEC's Regulation Crypto has been leaking since the beginning of the year, yet it hasn't even completed a proposal vote. How short is "short-term"? Three months? Half a year? Or will it wait until after the 2026 midterm elections? To be honest in the end: U.S. regulation doesn't mean it doesn't do anything—it's that it can't get things done. Congress is split between two parties, and neither dares to compromise. The SEC wants to push its own rules, but fears running into legislative issues with Congress. The result is—the entire industry is left hanging in the middle, waiting for answers in the cold wind. And this answer might not even come in September. The Senate will reconvene on September 14, but reconvening does not mean passing. The split between the two parties remains unresolved, leaving only a 19% chance of passage. Are you still waiting for "clear regulation"? The word 'clarity' may never have existed in this industry.$STRC price repeatedly tested around $95, with redemption liquidity from collateral pools directly confronting the structural clearing during the pre-TGE phase. On the market, the pricing support logic shifted from one-way dividend adjustments to two-way capital flow management, with bids showing signs of convergence around the $95 level. The asset integration with the sUSDat collateral layer aims to reduce off-chain cash-out friction during large-scale redemptions. The liquidation capacity of collateral pools has temporarily surpassed the credit premium in US stocks, becoming the dominant force in capital pricing. Whether on-chain acceptance depth can effectively alleviate selling pressure depends on whether the collateral pool's capital accumulation speed can outpace the incremental supply of on-chain credit tokens. If sUSDat's capital accumulation continues to accelerate and $STRC holds above $95, liquidity premiums will drive assets to concentrate on on-chain products; A sharp drop in market depth expected from TGE signals that this path is failing. If the underlying assets of the U.S. stock market experience sharp volatility triggering on-chain liquidations, or if there is a capital misallocation during redemption peaks, the market may come under pressure again; The activation of the on-chain repo mechanism is a sign of resistance to the downside. Product architecture adjustments or delays in redemption channels during the pre-TGE stage will directly break the two-way anchoring logic, rendering existing acceptance simulations completely ineffective. The most noteworthy variables over the next 7 days are $STRC's turnover rate at the $95 level and the actual injection friction of the sUSDat collateral pool. #OpenAI与Anthropic估值竞赛升温 #马斯克称AI将占SpaceX价值99%A few days ago, I looked at SanDisk's financial report and was honestly a bit stunned. Quarterly revenue was $8.97 billion, up 51% quarter-on-quarter; Gross margin reached 84.6%, and the data center business doubled directly, yet even after the earnings came out, the stock price still took a hit. At that moment, my feeling was: if you're not satisfied with this, what else does the market want? Later, I realized that what everyone worried about wasn't whether SanDisk made money this quarter, but whether the money earned now could be kept. After all, the storage industry used to be too cyclical. When prices rose, everyone was considered a stock god, but once capacity came up, profits vanished without a trace. So what really matters today on Investor Day isn't how many times management says "AI," but that it starts answering a more practical question: How can SanDisk stop being just a cyclical stock? Currently, the company has signed new long-term agreements with eight clients, covering about 50% of the expected shipments in fiscal year 2027 and about two-thirds in fiscal year 2028. Simply put, it means locking in part of demand and prices in advance, avoiding the days of "eating meat this year, drinking wind next year." More directly, management's 2028-2030 fiscal year targets include about 80% non-GAAP gross margin and about 50% adjusted free cash flow, and stated plans to return all remaining cash to shareholders after completing necessary investments. $SNDK #美股全线走高, crypto stocks lead the rally. #存储股抛压缓和, is the AI memory bull market still stable? #海力士推进NAND扩产, expectations for storage supply are rising The polarization between US stocks and crypto has taken many by surprise. On one side, US stocks hit new highs; on the other, Bitcoin fell below 63,000 and continued to decline. Though both are financial risk assets, they have taken completely different directions. Many people think "crypto and US stocks are already highly correlated and should rise and fall together," but in reality, such divergences often occur. Let's first review last week's data: The July nonfarm payroll was significantly below expectations (actual decrease of 23,000 yuan, expected increase of 80,000-90,000), combined with previous CPI meeting expectations and being relatively moderate. Soft data has eased the pressure for the Fed to continue raising rates, providing support for U.S. stocks and continuing to rise. The crypto community's reaction was limited at the time, with no obvious surge, only maintaining volatility. Today, another divergence has emerged: US stocks continued to strengthen, while $BTC's four-hour chart clearly weakened, dropping to around $62,600. Meanwhile, tokenized U.S. stock-related assets like $SNDK have actually surged. This shows that capital is not "overall risk appetite rising," but rather selective flow The core reasons can be broken down into three points: 1. Liquidity and capital diversion Currently, market liquidity is not abundant. Limited funds prefer to flow into the hottest and most narrative-driven areas right now—US stocks in AI, semiconductors, and tech giants. With the overall buzz in the crypto world low, naturally less capital is allocated. 2. The "bloodsucking" effect of U.S. stocks on the crypto world After exchanges launched a large number of US tokenized US stock products, some funds that might have flowed into crypto-native assets were directly diverted to these targets that could "ride US stock gains and trade on crypto platforms." As a result, US stocks rose and related tokens rose, but mainstream coins like BTC and $ETH came under pressure. 3. Bitcoin ETF capital movements The latest data shows that on August 13, BTC spot ETFs saw a net outflow of about $131 million. Institutional funds are flowing out rather than flowing in, directly weakening Bitcoin's support. This stands in stark contrast to the continued capital inflows in US stocks. My personal trading advice: Currently, US stocks are indeed still in an upward channel. If you haven't kept up, you can keep watching, but there's no need to rush to chase highers. On the crypto side, the strategy with relatively better value for money is to patiently wait for Bitcoin to truly stabilize. Once BTC stops falling on the daily or four-hour charts and regains key support, gradually deploy to crypto assets. When the US stock market's rally slows and the hype cools down, funds are likely to naturally flow back into the crypto space. Instead of chasing surges and selling lows now, it's better to wait for Bitcoin to give a clear signal of stabilization. At this moment, it is crucial not to act impulsively; patiently wait for Bitcoin to stabilize and wait for a safer window to enter the position. #CLARITY表决待定，SEC规则未落地 现在美国加密两条合规路径，双双被堵死。 CLARITY法案8月休会前彻底搁浅，全院表决推迟至9月。参议院领袖图恩正式确认，等到9月14日议员复会后再推进流程。Polymarket上面该法案2026年落地概率，已经从5月初70%以上，跌到如今仅有14%左右。 僵局根源：民主党执意增加严格伦理条款，直接牵扯特朗普家族大约14亿美元加密资产。共和党手握53个参议院席位，法案过关需要凑够60票，最少要7名民主党议员倒戈，目前公开表态愿意支持的民主党人仅仅2位。如果9月15日前拿不出实质性进展，马上进入中期选举周期，法案今年基本凉透。 立法这条路走不通，行政监管这条路同样临时断掉。 原定8月15日召开的Reg‑Crypto规则提案会，本来准备推出加密资产发行豁免框架，也是SEC有史以来第一次大规模加密规则制定工作。结果8月14日晚间，SEC以无法预见的日程冲突为由，临时取消本次会议，没有公布新的开会时间。 立法、行政规则制定两条路，现阶段全部陷入停滞。 灰度研究主管说得非常透彻：就算CLARITY法案最终无法落地，也不会直接影响主流公链运转，更不会改变比特币作为价值存储资产的底层需求。比特币并不需要CLARITY，恰恰是美国市场需要监管确定性。 无论参议院博弈结果如何，比特币每隔十分钟，照样挖出新区块。 SEC主席阿特金斯此前表态，SEC已经准备好了监管规则，可以解决原本CLARITY法案想要搞定的全部问题。Bitwise首席投资官判断，如果由本届SEC出台细则，规则反而有可能比国会法案更加友好。 但是现在规则会议临时取消，短期两条路全部看不到明确时间表。 美国加密监管正式进入双重停滞。立法推不动，行政规则延后落地。短期对于盘面属于情绪逆风，但撼动不了BTC长期底层逻辑。 CLARITY法案市场预期从年初70%一路跌到14%，BTC依旧在64000一带震荡。华盛顿政客的博弈，只是短期噪音；算力与全网共识，才是比特币真正的底层底盘。千万别被国会扯皮晃下车。 $BTC $ETH $SNDK 交易员狗总$BTC ETFs see another $131 million outflow! The three giants pulled out simultaneously. Fidelity and ARK lead the sell-off! Continuous selling pressure once again suppressed the market. Long and short positions are set to go all out again at 63,000! On August 13, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a total net outflow of $131.1 million. BlackRock saw $5.7 million, Fidelity $55.1 million, ARK Invest $58.8 million, totaling $119.6 million in withdrawals. This marks the second consecutive trading day of net outflow, with a two-day total of about $192.2 million, indicating that short-term institutional buying is indeed cooling down. However, last week ETFs recorded a net inflow of about $853.5 million. As long as the $63,000 area continues to support and funds turn positive again, this wave resembles a turnover after a strong inflow. ETF selling can't break through $63,000, and bears are starting to question their lives! $ETH $SNDK Once funds turn positive again, this batch of outflows could become fuel for the next round of rebounds! #CPI与PPI同步降温, the divergence between rate hikes has widened $SNDK 最近美股走势强势，属于美股的牛市难道来了？ 我们解析一下这支$SNDK 为什么走势这么强势： 1.受美股行情波动影响： 近日美股整体走势偏强，且刚刚又创新高。主要催化之一是美国7月 PPI意外持平，市场对美联储继续加息的担忧有所下降，科技股表现尤其强。属于典型的“加密市场映射美股“ 2.AI需求： AI 模型越来越大，数据中心不仅需要 GPU，也需要大量高速、大容量存储。闪迪主要做 NAND 闪存、SSD 和数据存储产品。随着 AI 数据中心对高容量存储的需求增长，所以存储产业链成为市场比较关注的方向。公司最新财报中，Q4 营收达到 89.7亿美元，明显高于市场预期的84.8亿美元；数据中心收入也达到 29.8亿美元。 3. 最关键的催化剂：公司给出了非常激进的长期目标 8月13日的 Investor Day 是这次上涨的重要催化剂。 SanDisk 给出了 2028—2030财年营收每年中高个位数到十几个百分点增长的目标，并预计调整后毛利率约 80%、自由现金流利润率约 50%。消息出来后，股价单日一度上涨超过15%。而且公司已经签下多项多年期客户协议，金额合计约 939亿美元，这让市场开始把 SanDisk 从传统的“周期性存储股”，重新看成具有长期 AI 存储增长逻辑的公司。 $SNDK 这轮上涨，核心是AI带来的存储需求+NAND供给偏紧+公司长期盈利预期上修，而不是单纯的“庄家拉盘”。 但是市场预期也已经非常高。真正决定它还能不能继续走的，不只是“AI很火”，而是实际订单、利润率、现金流能不能持续超过市场预期。#闪迪投资者日后股价大涨，长期目标待验证 $ONDO I strongly disagree with the view that just because the Ondo project is operating well, the $ONDO token should naturally rise. Admittedly, the $ONDO price might increase. But what factors will truly drive it higher? This token itself almost has no application scenarios. Some might say Ondo has solid products and a real user base. I do not deny this. As of Q3 2026, Ondo's total locked assets have reached $3.4 billion. USDY is widely used, with locked assets around $740 million. But what do investors holding $ONDO get from this? Nothing at all. On the contrary, tens of millions of dollars worth of $ONDO tokens are continuously transferred to centralized exchanges, waiting to be sold at a price. The supply pressure is far from over; before 2028, more than 5 billion ONDO tokens are still waiting to be unlocked. The project’s products have been developing for three years, and all protocol-generated revenue belongs entirely to the project company. Meanwhile, the token price has dropped more than 80% from its historical high. If you want to see what a token with real utility looks like, you can refer to $HYPE. So next time, don’t ask: Why does the token keep falling even though the project is developing well? Instead, think about how much value actually flows back to the token itself. These past couple of days, I've been monitoring ETF fund flows and noticed a rather interesting change. BTC is starting to flow out, while ETH is still receiving funds. The logic used to be simple: when institutions buy BTC, the whole market rises together. But now, it doesn't seem that simple. If only the overall market is bearish, then BTC and ETH should be under pressure together. But now there is a clear divergence in funds: BTC is flowing out, while ETH is being picked up. This made me start to wonder if institutions were picking assets again rather than simply withdrawing from the crypto market. Of course, I still can't outright say "the ETH bull market is here." After all, ETH's price is still very weak, and whether capital inflows can continue is the key. But if the following emerges: BTC ETFs continue to flow out, ETH ETFs keep flowing in, and ETH/BTC starts to stabilize, then this signal is worth paying close attention to. Because this could mean that funds are not leaving crypto but are being replaced. So the question arises: Is Wall Street truly pessimistic about BTC, or is it starting to believe ETH has higher odds? I'm not in a hurry to draw conclusions now. But I will continue to monitor this funding direction. Do you think this is just a short-term divergence, or the beginning of a new round of capital rotation? $BTC $ETH #CPI与PPI同步降温, rate hike divergences widen #CLARITY表决待定, SEC rules remain unimplemented #财报观察员: AI infrastructure earnings report debuts one after another CPI and PPI both cooled, and while the macro outlook was clearly positive, $BTC remained flat at 62,600, $ETH at 1,867, $SOL 75, with the three major components collectively playing dead. The most painful signal is that good news doesn't rise. Money is all rushing into US stocks to buy AI storage—SanDisk's bullish candlestick hits 18 points, and LITE and COHR are taking off too. In the crypto world, the stock of funds is shrinking, and the altcoins rotate to a new hotspot every day, and those chasing in basically end up helping the big players carry the sedan chair. Today is Friday, a reminder: liquidity becomes thin as soon as the weekend arrives, the probability of inserting a needle rises sharply, so don't bet on direction when no one is taking over. Contract brothers, leverage should be lowered if possible; only by staying alive can next week be possible. My attitude remains unchanged: hold onto spot positions at the bottom area, don't go all-in, wait for incremental funds to enter the market. The market is built through endurance, not by chasing $BTC $ETH $SOLOndo's strategic investment in Saturn and the introduction of $STRC into the sUSDat collateral pool centers on whether the liquidity gains from on-chain US credit assets can hedge against the structural clearing risk of products during the pre-TGE stage. Market data shows that $STRC quotes have stabilized around $95. The underlying support logic has shifted from the previous one-way dividend adjustment to a two-way capital flow management involving issuance and repurchase operations. The order of capital flows driving pricing is: collateral pool liquidation support is higher than US credit premium, and institutional repo is higher than pre-TGE market order gambling. Saturn has integrated $STRC into the sUSDat collateral layer, focusing on reducing off-chain cash-out friction during large redemptions. Upside scenario: If the sUSDat pool's funds accumulate faster than the supply growth of on-chain credit tokens, and $STRC remains above $95 for two-way peg, liquidity premiums will drive assets to concentrate on-chain combination products. The signal that this scenario fails is a sharp drop in trading depth in the pre-TGE market. Downside scenario: If price fluctuations in the underlying U.S. stock cause on-chain asset liquidations, or if sUSDat experiences capital misallocation during redemption peaks, $STRC may again face price suppression. The signal for this scenario to fail is that Saturn and Ondo have jointly activated the on-chain repo mechanism to absorb the sell-off. The boundary of the overall simulation failure lies in product architecture changes or systemic delays in redemption channels during the pre-TGE phase. If the pool of funds fails to improve the actual redemption experience, pure strategic cooperation cannot support the price stabilizing above the $95 mark. In the next 7 days, focus on the $STRC turnover rate at the $95 level, as well as the actual injection scale and redemption friction data in the sUSDat collateral pool. #闪迪投资者日后股价大涨, long-term goals to be validated #CLARITY表决待定, SEC rules not yet implemented, #加密估值转向收入, how should BTC be priced?When Tether's first complete audit was laid out, what I looked at first wasn't the conclusion, but whose stamp it was stamped on. Most of the reserves are pinned on U.S. Treasuries, while the interest goes into the company's pocket. Transparency can control what is "visible," but it cannot control what is "shared." Gold owes no one an audit report. Gold bars lying in vaults rely on physical attributes, at the cost of no interest; USDT relies on auditors, XAU on the periodic table; both sell the same word: stability. I'm often a step behind, but it's still better than losing my shoe. I'll wait for the coverage to decide whether the signing is for the entire group or a single subsidiary. Don't rush to write the ending; the next round of stablecoin flows is the main story. This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile; please make independent judgments and be aware of the risks #$XAU 인플레이션 둔화는 확인됐지만 BTC와 ETH는 왜 제자리인가 시장이 기대를 선반영했다면, 이제 남은 것은 그 기대를 넘어설 증거인가? 미국 3월 CPI가 전년 대비 3.4%로 집계되며 둔화 흐름을 이어갔고, PPI 역시 냉각세를 보였다. 이에 따라 연준의 조기 금리 인하 기대가 다시 고개를 들었다. 그러나 비트코인은 63,552달러 부근에서 횡보 중이며, 64,000달러 저항을 돌파하지 못하고 있다. 이더리움 역시 1,886달러 선에서 1,900달러를 반복적으로 테스트하지만 확실한 돌파를 확보하지 못하고 있다. 이번 CPI와 PPI 수치는 인플레이션 둔화 경로를 재확인해준 것은 분명하다. 하지만 시장은 헤드라인 자체보다 그 헤드라인이 이미 가격에 반영됐는지를 먼저 계산한다. 실제로 발표 이전부터 금리 인하 기대가 선반영되며 매수 포지션이 선제적으로 구축됐을 가능성이 크고, 데이터 발표 이후에는 차익 실현 매물이 신규 진입 자금을 압도하는 구도가 연출되고 있다. 오늘 밤 약 1억 4천BTC is sitting in a rare spot right now, where two opposing macro forces are nearly cancelling each other out. **What should push price higher:** the cooling inflation trend is reducing the odds of a Fed rate hike in September — historically a bullish factor for risk assets. **What's keeping price down:** Middle East tensions (the Strait of Hormuz) continue to create uncertainty, which traditionally pushes investors to cut risk regardless of monetary policy outlook. **Why this matters:** When twJuly's CPI and PPI were both moderate, US stocks continued to strengthen, the S&P hit a new high, the Nasdaq rose about 0.8%, and AI hardware stocks like MU and SNDK also rose. $BTC is still stuck between $62,000 and $66,000, with trading volume and volatility continuing to decline. This shows that the problem is no longer just macro, but within the crypto community. ETF funds are indeed buying, but miners, corporate positions, and trapped positions are also selling. The result is that while some take over, the price never moves. Next, I'll look at just a few locations: $63,000 is a box defense; if it falls, we must prevent further declines. Only when it stabilizes between 64,500 and 65,000 USD will the short-term market be considered stronger. Only when volume surpasses $66,000 and ETF inflows resume can one qualify to talk about a trend reversal. I'm not in a hurry to guess the answer now. The $6,000 in 2018 and the $20,000 in 2022 both traded sideways for a long time, making people mistakenly believe the risk has passed. In the end, what hurts people is often not a big drop, but the sense of security created by sideways movement.#闪迪投资者日后股价大涨, long-term goals remain to be verified SanDisk's $SNDK surge mainly reassured the market by holding an investor conference: 1. Large quantities of goods were pre-ordered by Yundachuang Several internet cloud providers have signed long-term contracts, and more than half of the flash memory capacity for the next year or the year after has already been booked. Previously, storage stocks were mainly driven by chip price increases—big profits when prices rose, huge losses when they fell. Now, with long-term orders as a safety net, the market feels it won't have the same dramatic swings as before, and can offer higher valuations 2. He drew a very beautiful blueprint for long-term profits They publicly revealed their goals for the coming years, expecting to maintain high profit margins over the long term, and said that after investing in the project, all excess cash would be returned to shareholders, with large buybacks supporting the stock price 3. Too much drop in the previous period, then rebounded from oversold prices Previously, when the price nearly halved from its peak, many people were short and bearish. With this positive news, the shorts quickly closed their positions and fled, further pushing the stock price upward 4. Harmony with the broader environment US inflation data is not high, and overall sentiment in tech stocks is warming up. In contrast, while some companies rely solely on word talk, SanDisk is now making real money, has secured orders, and capital is willing to buy it ⚠️ But let's be clear: Flash memory prices are still rising, but the pace of price increases has slowed; Consumer businesses for mobile phones and computers remain struggling, and profits rely entirely on AI servers. This wave is a valuation recovery after a heavy decline, but it doesn't mean another wild rally. There will still be big swings going forward. Can long-term contract orders fully withstand the industry's downturn? #CPI与PPI同步降温, the rate hike divide widened Another major U.S. debt bomb has landed! Long-term financing costs in the U.S. have soared sharply. The yield on the 30-year government bond auction surged to 5.216%, the highest since 2001, and all types of global risk assets need to closely monitor future developments. The U.S. Treasury completed a $25 billion 30-year Treasury tender, with a winning yield of 5.216%, setting a 25-year record. Long-term funding demands higher yields, reflecting that market concerns about fiscal deficits, massive debt supply, and recurring inflation have not disappeared. Long-term yields remain elevated, which on one hand raises financing costs for governments and businesses, temporarily suppressing the valuation levels of US stocks and BTC; But the longer interest rates remain high, the greater the pressure on US debt interest-paying becomes, and subsequent shifts in monetary policy and demand for liquidity easing will gradually strengthen. Short-term high interest rates suppress the market; if a deep pullback occurs, it can actually clear out low-value chips with good cost-effectiveness. #美国30年期国债拍卖收益率创2001年新高 Once long-term bond yields peak and retreat, BTC is likely to be the first to unleash strong rebound momentum. #加密估值转向收入, how is BTC priced? Risk Warning: Only sharing ideas, not investment advice, no inappropriate guidance, comply with community conventions! $BTC $ETH $SNDK $500, $125 million, 40x leverage—this guy is just one needle away from zero 0xff84 this address, starting August 5, it started a fierce battle with $BTC, entering 1,600 short positions at a liquidation price of 64,889. On August 7, BTC jumped to 65,000, but after cutting 200 coins, it lost 146,000. You think it backed down? No, the losses kept increasing. On August 12, it added 1,010 coins, and on August 14, it reached 2,000 coins. The liquidation price rose from 64,889 to 63,532 Right now, BTC is hovering around 63,000, just $500 away from a liquidation Even more outrageous—he only had $2.7 million in equity on his books. With 2.7 million to leverage 125 million, the price jumped 0.8%, and the 125 million was instantly wiped out. This wasn't a deal, it was a life-or-death gamble The external environment is also unfriendly to him. CPI cools down, the probability of a rate hike drops to 44%, the S&P 500 hits a new high, US stocks are in wild celebration, and BTC is still hovering at 63,000. The Fear and Greed Index is 29, in the "fear" range. But what are institutions doing? In the first week of August, ETFs made 850 million, BlackRock alone took 694 million, and on August 11, another 50.2 million was absorbed. Whales added 46,420 BTC in 60 days. Retail investors panicked and cut losses, while institutions took over Then this guy bets 125 million that BTC will fall below 63,000 63,532, remember this number. As long as BTC returns above this, 125 million will be wiped out 63,000 BTC is just $500 away from triggering a short position. Every time you add a position, it helps the bulls make it easier to break through. 125 million in fuel—if you don't use it, it's a waste to use it$BTC Grayscale estimates that if these adjustments are implemented, by the end of 2031, ETH's annual supply inflation rate will drop to about 0.4%, close to BTC; SOL will be about 1.1%. In comparison, gold's annual supply growth rate is about 1.8%, and the U.S. CPI inflation rate is about 3.3%.$CAP 的分析以及是否像$LAB $BEAT 一样爆拉控盘再爆跌呢? CAP 是 Cap Protocol，那它和 LAB 有一些相似点，但也有明显区别。 CAP 当前情况 * 市值约 2500万~4000万美元区间，属于小市值项目。 * 流通量仅约 15.6%，仍有大量未释放代币。 * 上线后曾从约0.01美元拉升至0.04美元以上，最高涨幅超过300%。 * 背后是链上信用借贷协议，不是纯MEME。TVL曾达到2.7亿美元左右。 CAP具备爆拉条件 1. 市值较小 * 3000万美元级别市值。 * 资金进入5000万~1亿美元就能产生巨大涨幅。 2. 上所规格高 * Coinbase、Kraken、Bybit、OKX等主流交易所均有交易。 * 流动性远强于很多小币。 3. RWA+链上信贷赛道 * 目前市场正在轮动 AI → RWA → 金融基础设施。 * 如果RWA再次成为热点，CAP容易被资金关注。 4. 筹码相对集中 * 流通比例低。 * 小资金即可推动价格快速上涨。 为什么我认为它不如LAB疯狂 LAB更像情绪驱动项目。 而CAP属于： * 有业务 * 有TVL * 有机构背景 * 有收入逻辑 这种项目一般： * 暴跌幅度较小 * 暴涨速度也慢于纯MEME LAB那种： * 一周10倍 * 一个月20倍 CAP出现的概率明显低一些。 是否存在庄家控盘嫌疑？ 有一定嫌疑，但证据不足以认定。 原因： * 流通仅15%左右。 * FDV是流通市值的6倍以上。 * 成交量长期占市值30%~50%以上。 这种结构经常出现： 项目方 + 做市商 + 早期投资人共同影响价格。 但目前没有像你之前提到的 BEAT、RAVE 那样明显的单地址控盘证据。 我对未来6个月的预估 如果： * BTC重新进入主升浪 * ETH突破关键压力位 * RWA赛道获得资金关注 那么CAP： * 保守：+50%~100% * 乐观：+200%~400% * 极端FOMO行情：5~10倍 但如果市场转弱：* CAP也可能回撤50%以上。 综合来看： CAP属于“有基本面的小市值项目”，爆发力低于LAB，但长期存活概率高于LAB。$SNDK Damn? Keep going more! SanDisk's positive news this time is indeed very strong! The profit target continues to be raised Not only SNDK, but SK Hynix $SKHYNIX also has ample cash flow, and future shareholder return expectations are also worth watching; Coupled with the continued rise in AI storage demand, Micron $MU is also benefiting from this industry dividend. The logic behind the sector is no longer just a simple rebound, but rather fundamentals changing. As long as the trend isn't broken, pullbacks are opportunities. We'll keep watching the bullish momentum going forward! 🔥I just saw a brother directly take a long ETH position on the chain—it was pretty strong. The token is ETH, with 8x leverage, a long position, and a position price of 1,868.50. Holding a position size of 467,125 USD, with 250 units. This kind of order may sound intimidating, but don't get carried away just because your position is large. To put it bluntly, 8x leverage is never meant for people who get emotionally involved. If you look in the right direction, you get to the meat; if you misjudge, you use your capital to fill the market's hole. Don't treat a screenshot as an imperial decree, and don't automatically imagine large positions as a guaranteed win signal. If you don't understand, just move less. Holding positions is just foolish. If something feels off, stop your losses when necessary. Don't wait for the market to teach you how to deal with people.The 30-day moving average of Bitcoin's average coin dormant period has risen to 19 days, and for the first time since the beginning of the year, it has surpassed the 365-day moving average. BTC that was accumulated earlier is becoming active again. But after the Coldcard hack, this increase may not have come from sell-offs, but rather from large amounts of BTC being transferred to new wallets. Therefore, the current rise in the dormant period should not be automatically interpreted as long-term holders distributing their shares #Must-read for beginners: Here's everything you need $BTC #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard 今日SNDK大涨复盘：憋了许久的多头情绪彻底爆发，存储周期逻辑迎来质变 今天的$SNDK，终于把市场积压已久的多头预期彻底释放出来，一扫前段时间的压抑阴霾。 说实话，前几天看完闪迪最新财报，我一度非常费解甚至困惑。 单季营收89.7亿美元，环比大涨51%；核心毛利率直接冲到恐怖的84.6%，在全美股科技板块都属于顶流水平；最亮眼的业务端，数据中心存储业务直接翻倍增长，完美踩中AI算力、AI存储的主流赛道。 按理说，这份业绩放在任何周期、任何行情里，都是绝对的炸裂财报。 但市场完全不买账，财报落地后股价持续承压、逆势挨打。 当时我相信所有人都有同一个疑问：业绩已经拉满，市场到底还在不满什么、还在害怕什么？ 后来复盘通透了：市场真正担心的，从来不是闪迪当下赚不赚钱，而是现在的利润能不能留住、能不能持续。 存储行业是A股、美股公认的极致强周期赛道，过往几十年剧本从未变过： 涨价周期，全行业躺赢，随便做都能暴利，人人都是股神； 一旦全球产能释放、供需反转，价格快速回落，行业利润瞬间蒸发，高毛利、高营收全部归零。 但今天的投资者日，彻底改写了这套旧逻辑。 这次发布会最核心、最值钱的内容，根本不是管理层反复画饼的AI概念、行业愿景，而是实打实解决了存储行业最大的痛点：利润不稳定、业绩不可控、周期波动极大。 一、全新NBM长期锁量协议，彻底弱化周期波动 闪迪正式落地全新商业模式，已与8家行业核心大客户签订长期锁定协议，合同总价值接近940亿美金，平均合约期限超4年。 合约覆盖力度堪称恐怖： - 2027财年：锁定全球50%存储出货量 ​ - 2028财年：锁定全球2/3存储出货量 这意味着什么？ 意味着未来两年，公司一半以上的产能、营收、订单全部提前锁定。 不再依赖短期市场涨价炒作，不再被现货价格暴涨暴跌绑架。 从过去“靠天吃饭”的周期博弈，变成了有保底、有确定性、有稳定现金流的成长模式。 更关键的是：这套合约采用固定+浮动双向定价机制，自带价格上下限保护。 哪怕未来NAND闪存价格回落、行业进入下行周期，仅靠合约底价，公司依旧能稳住80%级别超高毛利率。 真正实现：下行周期保利润，上行周期吃增量，彻底告别“今年吃肉、明年喝风”的极端周期宿命。 二、2028-2030超级业绩目标，重新定义行业天花板 本次投资者日直接给出未来三年确定性极强的长期指引，数据极其炸裂，远超华尔街机构预期： 1. 营收维持中高双位数增长，完全匹配AI存储算力的行业增量； ​ 2. 非GAAP毛利率稳定80%、营业利润率75%； ​ 3. 调整后自由现金流率高达50%； ​ 4. 资本开支仅维持营收中个位数，轻资产、高现金流、高利润。 做个直观对比：当下顶级AI龙头英伟达毛利率仅70%出头，而转型后的闪迪，长期稳态毛利率直接碾压AI算力龙头。 最重磅的股东回馈政策： 公司明确表态，在完成必要的技术迭代、产能投资后，100%剩余现金全部返还股东。 不再盲目扩产内卷、不再低效烧钱，把真金白银利润全部回馈二级市场，彻底重构估值体系。 三、市场认知彻底反转：从周期炒作到AI核心资产 此前资金对SNDK的认知只有一句话：NAND涨价就涨，NAND跌价就跌。 完全是纯粹的周期博弈、情绪炒作。 今天之后，市场终于看懂了它的核心价值： AI的底层逻辑分两块——算力+存储。 算力负责让AI思考、运算、迭代； 存储负责让AI记忆、留存、沉淀数据。 过去资金扎堆炒作算力、GPU，完全忽视存储的长期价值； 如今资金开始纠错回流，AI内存、AI存储的迟到牛市，正式开启修复行情。 四、客观理性复盘：利好落地不是终点，是验证起点 当然，我不会无脑喊星辰大海、无脑吹翻倍行情。 所有长期目标、商业模式升级，目前依旧处于落地初期，后续依旧有三大核心变量需要一季一季财报验证： 1. 长期NBM合约能否顺利履约，稳定锁死未来两年出货与利润； ​ 2. 后续NAND现货价格回落时，80%超高毛利率能否真正守住； ​ 3. HBF全新技术、AI存储解决方案能否持续落地，兑现行业增量。 周期属性不会瞬间完全消失，但周期波动率、业绩不确定性已经大幅下降。 最后总结 今天SNDK的大涨，不是单纯的情绪反弹、消息套利，而是估值逻辑的根本性切换。 从前：资金炒周期、炒涨价、炒短期情绪，涨得快、跌得更凶； 现在：资金炒成长、炒确定性、炒AI永续增量、炒稳定现金流。 存储板块的抛压彻底缓解，所谓的“周期见顶、产能过剩”利空已经被市场充分消化。 算力行情早已走疯，而被低估、错杀的AI存储牛市，才刚刚启动。 静待后续财报验证，这一次，存储的行情，不再是短期反弹，而是周期弱化后的全新成长行情。 $SNDK #美股全线走高，加密股领涨 #存储股抛压缓和，AI内存牛市还稳吗？ #海力士推进NAND扩产，存储供给预期上升My judgment After breaking 63,000, the short-term trend is bearish. But the 62,200-62,500 range is a tightly stocked area for early trading, so resistance will be there. The biggest fear now is a bearish drop—no explosive rally, no crash, just a few hundred points a day, like boiling a frog in warm water. In this situation, positions can't be heavy; stop-loss must be strict. $BTC $ETH $SNDK #财报观察员: AI infrastructure earnings report takes the stage
Orbit Topic Sitemap