Orbit Post Sitemap
#美光加码AI存储，十年研发投入100亿美元
The more AI intensifies, the more valuable storage becomes.
Micron is starting to bet early on the next wave of demand.
Recently, there has been a change in the AI industry that I think is worth noting: money is beginning to flow from GPUs to storage.
Micron plans to invest about $10 billion in Japan over the next ten years for R&D and production, focusing on advanced storage technologies needed for AI servers.
The reason is quite easy to understand.
AI models are getting larger, and servers need to process more data. GPUs alone are no longer enough; high-speed storage like HBM and DRAM are also becoming bottlenecks.
So in this round of AI market trends, you shouldn’t just focus on NVIDIA.
GPUs handle computation, storage feeds the data. As AI computing power continues to expand, storage is very likely the next area to continuously receive capital expenditure. $SNDK $MU $SKHYNIX #美启动对伊经济孤立，油价为何回落？ #Strategy增发扩充现金，BTC配置节奏受关注 Bitcoin has returned to $80,000 after more than three months, reaching a high of 80,908. It rose 23% in the past week, marking the largest weekly gain in nearly three years.
Several factors are behind this surge: U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced increased long-term bond repurchases to suppress long-end yields, weakening the dollar, while both Bitcoin and gold have been rising. Last week, 13 U.S. spot BTC ETFs saw a net inflow of $1.92 billion, the strongest weekly inflow in nearly 10 months. Additionally, Trump is pushing for crypto legislation, which also supports market sentiment.
But here’s the problem—short sellers were liquidated for $7.2 billion. This rally is largely driven by a short squeeze rather than genuine buying interest.
On-chain signals are also worth noting. $BTC short-term holders (cost basis around 68,700) have unlocked profits and transferred over 43,000 BTC to exchanges, marking the largest profit-taking scale this year. New whales realized over $1.2 billion in profits within three days, with a single-day record of $614 million. In other words, those who held for over half a year have finally broken even and are eager to exit.
Whether the price can hold depends on two points: whether the short-term holders’ cost line at 70,000 can hold, and whether this week’s PCE data and Jackson Hole speeches provide a dovish signal. If both align and ETFs continue to see inflows, the rebound could turn into a trend.
83,000 is the first hurdle; only after surpassing it can we look toward 85,000–90,000. Until then, a rally driven by a short squeeze won’t be gentle with the surge of selling at high levels. #BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 $SPCX SPCX 136.27, SpaceXAI adopts NVIDIA Vera CPU to accelerate Agentic AI — this news might be a major catalyst for a surge in other assets, but for SPCX, the price barely moved because the unlocking expectations suppress the price more than the technical benefits. 😅
SAR=133.57 is just below, recently broken through; EMA21=135.73 is also underfoot; EMA55=136.61 is overhead, and the price is trying to break through EMA55 — if it can close steadily above 136.6, the short-term trend may turn stronger; if it falls back, it might retest the 133-135 range. RSI6=60.46, RSI12=53.00, RSI24=49.18 — short-term strengthening, mid-term neutral. The KDJ three lines are diverging upwards, just formed a golden cross, momentum is still strengthening but not by much.
If the news about NVIDIA Vera CPU had come six months ago, SPCX might have already surged to 150. But now the market seems a bit "tired" of SpaceX's good news — it's not that the good news is unimportant, but the unlocking expectations have suppressed the price too much. The technical breakthrough is real, but the contract structure is another matter. SpaceX's fundamentals are fine, but SPCX's contract structure has unlocking issues. When fundamentals and contract structure conflict, the market usually resolves the contract structure issue first before considering fundamentals.
Comment below, do you think SPCX can break through 140? Or is 138 the peak for this wave? My account is still empty, but I'm curious about your views. 🫡
The adoption of NVIDIA Vera CPU is a solid technical upgrade for SpaceX. But if even news of this level can't support the price, what will be SPCX's next positive catalyst? If you disagree, come argue and show your trades. 😅#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口
Damn! Is the raging bull market just around the corner?
Bitcoin just surged wildly from the bottom to above 80,000, ETH followed up to 2,500, and the entire crypto market cap soared to around 2.7 trillion.
Meanwhile, the US stock market is a mess: the Nasdaq just softened into a puddle, dropping nearly one percent. AI hardware has completely collapsed, with Nvidia falling for seven consecutive days, setting the longest losing streak in recent years.
Storage chips and optical communication guys are even worse off. Micron dropped nearly 6%, SanDisk and Seagate each fell over 6%, the whole sector got tossed around like a rag, and money is flowing into defensive stocks.
Funds are clearly fleeing from overvalued chips to defensive plays, but crypto is doing its own thing, completely decoupled from traditional markets.
I don’t think this feels like a bull market returning. This is a drop from the 126,000 high, and the current trend is still shaky and drifting downward. Every rebound is weak, with each high lower than the last.
Just a few thousand dollars up, or a few days of consecutive gains, and people get impatient and start making up bullish stories?
The only real level to watch is 84,000. That’s not just a random line; it’s the bull-bear dividing line for this cycle. Only if it breaks through and holds does it count.
In the past week, spot ETFs have sucked in over 2 billion dollars, with institutions quietly buying in.
The US Treasury has doubled its bond repurchase efforts, 30-year Treasury yields are falling, and the dollar is weakening. Shorts are being force-liquidated wave after wave, exploding like it’s New Year. Leveraged longs are crowded tightly between 75,000 and 79,000.
Short liquidation pressure above 80,000 is piled high; pushing higher could trigger a chain of forced liquidations. But right now, short-term profit-taking is as thick as a city wall. If it can’t hold 81,000 and falls back to the 78,000–79,000 range, that’s completely expected.
Look at how traders on X are analyzing it. Some are shouting, “No more resistance, might sweep to 82,000 or even clear liquidity above 80,000.”
Some big influencers think 84,000 is the biggest resistance, possibly grinding there first then pulling back to 78,000. Long-term bulls shouldn’t expect a true bull market to start immediately; institutions are eager to push to target prices to facilitate selling.
This Friday, Powell will speak at Jackson Hole, and everyone is hoping he can present clear standards that truly connect economic data with policy.
80,000 has already been stepped on, and many people are FOMO chasing the rally. But the real bull-bear dividing line is still around 84,000!
In a bull market, blindly chasing highs and selling lows will only accelerate your losses! Bitcoin has finally stomped $80,000 underfoot. From over $60,000 all the way up to $80,000, this move is indeed quite fast. In just over a week, it has risen more than 25%, and even the previously low-lying knockoff coins have started to move, with SOL jumping 8% today. But I actually think the biggest concern now is not not getting in the stock, but getting carried away. Clear signs of overheating have already appeared in the market. After BTC surged above $80,000, the short-term rally was too rapid, and technical indicators have entered the overbought zone. Even more interestingly, some people in the market have already started directly betting $82,000, with single bets reaching $2.9 million. Everyone should understand this feeling — the higher the price rises, the more excited those chasing the rally become, and the easier it is to rebuild leverage. After so many years of doing BTC, I have one feeling that hasn't changed: the real danger is often not that no one is bullish, but that everyone suddenly thinks, "This time it will definitely rise." Of course, the current rally is not purely driven by sentiment. After the U.S. Treasury expanded long-term Treasury repurchases, the dollar weakened, and "currency depreciation trading" was revived by the market, with assets like BTC and gold benefiting from the funds. There is another easily overlooked point: support for cryptocurrencies in U.S. politics is still increasing. Stand With Crypto has already endorsed 32 current House members, all of whom have supported the Clarity Act. The crypto industry is no longer just about trading cryptocurrencies; it is now participating in the U.S. midterm elections and regulatory games with real money. So I won't spend 80,000 on it nowThe US initiates "economic isolation" of Iran, yet oil prices fall—why?
On the surface, it seems counterintuitive:
US intensifies sanctions on Iran → geopolitical risk rises → crude oil should increase.
But the market is not trading on the word "sanctions" itself, but rather:
Will this action actually reduce global oil supply?
The current market answer is: not for now.
On August 24, the US Treasury announced expanded secondary sanctions on Iran aimed at further cutting off Iran's trade, financial, and energy revenues, but no immediate large-scale military action or full closure of the Strait of Hormuz has occurred yet.
Therefore, oil prices have actually fallen, with WTI dropping to about $85 and Brent to around $91.
First, the market views this as "economic pressure," not "military escalation."
This is the key distinction.
If the US announced:
Sanctions escalation + expanded military action + imminent closure of the Strait of Hormuz
Oil prices would likely quickly price in supply disruption risks.
But the signals from the US now are closer to:
Economic containment first, continued pressure, aiming to force Iran to concede.
Some analyses even suggest the market interprets this extreme pressure as creating conditions for negotiation or de-escalation, so risk premiums actually decline.
In other words:
Sanctions escalation ≠ immediate drop in crude oil supply.
Second, the market has already priced in a large portion of geopolitical risk in advance.
This is especially important.
Oil prices had already surged significantly due to US-Iran conflicts and Strait of Hormuz risks.
Now the market is shifting from:
"Will supply disruption happen?"
to:
"What is the actual probability of supply disruption?"
As long as this probability does not rise further, the previously accumulated war premium will start to be withdrawn.
So your earlier statement is very accurate:
Oil prices trade not today's barrels, but tomorrow's war probability.
Third, the market currently believes Iranian crude can still flow.
Iran's largest crude buyer remains China. Although US sanctions have clearly reduced Iran's crude flow to China, the market has not seen supply suddenly drop to zero.
Moreover, the most critical question remains:
Has the Strait of Hormuz been fully blocked?
As long as the strait remains partially open, the global market will not price oil as if all Iranian crude has exited.
---
But there is a reverse risk here.
Falling oil prices do not mean geopolitical risks have disappeared.
In fact, the market now shows a clear "asymmetry":
Negotiations/de-escalation → oil prices continue to fall.
Conflict escalation/substantial Strait of Hormuz disruption → oil prices may rebound quickly.
Especially since the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve is currently at very low levels, with buffer capacity significantly reduced compared to the early crisis stage.
So oil prices now look like:
Withdrawing some war premium but not fully removing geopolitical risk premium.
Real impact on the market
This is actually worth noting for gold, BTC, and US stocks.
If oil prices continue to fall:
Energy inflation pressure ↓
→ Market worries about further Fed tightening ↓
→ US Treasury yield pressure may ease
→ Risk assets gain some recovery room.
But if the Strait of Hormuz faces renewed substantial risk:
Oil prices ↑ → Inflation expectations ↑ → Rate cut expectations ↓ → US Treasury yields ↑ → BTC and US stocks under pressure.
So when watching crude oil now, the real focus should not be how many companies the US sanctioned today.
But rather:
Has the Strait of Hormuz experienced substantial supply disruption?
In short: The US "economic isolation" of Iran looks like an escalation of conflict, but the market currently interprets it as "economic pressure without simultaneous military risk escalation," so the previously accumulated war premium is being withdrawn. The real danger point for oil prices is not the sanctions themselves, but whether sanctions ultimately force Iran to take more aggressive countermeasures like blocking the Strait of Hormuz. $BTC #美启动对伊经济孤立，油价为何回落？ #ETH震荡 after reaching $2500
This time, I actually feel that $ETH sideways movement is not necessarily "accumulating strength for a rise," but more like cooling down after the previous sharp surge, even somewhat resembling distribution at a high level.
After the price surged from above 1800 to over 2500, there was no sustained volume increase pushing it higher; instead, it quickly entered a consolidation phase. This indicates that selling pressure at the top is not weak. Although ETF funds are still flowing in, the inflow pace has clearly slowed, and the price's reaction to the funds has started to dull. The bottom support remains but is far less solid than BTC.
What truly deserves attention is the coordination of volume and price. If ETH keeps lowering its highs during consolidation, with trading volume continuously shrinking and the inflow of funds unable to keep up, then this sideways movement is more likely distribution rather than bottom building.
Therefore, I won’t rush to be bullish just because there hasn’t been a big drop for a few days. Short-term opinions may differ, but as long as momentum weakens, the trend is prone to ending prematurely. On the contrary, chasing gains at the top is more likely to be driven by emotions, ultimately getting stuck halfway up the mountain. BTC hit the brakes above 77K, but I still didn't dare let go of the string in my heart. Have you noticed that the market lately doesn't seem to be a stagnant pool anymore? Last night, while watching the market, I stared at the high of 79.5K and then watched it slowly retreat. The first thought that popped into my mind wasn't "It's over," but rather "This time it really seems a bit different." BTC didn't crash after touching the highs like in previous rounds; instead, it held firmly above 77K, like a cat testing the water temperature before retracting its paw—alert but not fleeing. ETH also stayed quietly above 2.4K, not holding it back. What really lifted my spirits was that funds started testing the higher Beta direction. Elastic names like ZEC and HYPE actually started attracting funds to touch them. This shows the market no longer just huddles in the arms of industry leaders; risk appetite is quietly rising, and people are willing to look for opportunities farther away. The strength between sectors is shifting from "only big pies can be bought" to "even knockoffs want to show their skills." Behind this is a stronger support: US spot BTC and ETH ETFs attracted about $2.6 billion last week, marking the strongest weekly inflow since October. This money isn't pocket money for retail investors; it's institutions using real money to make a statement. When funds vote with their feet, it's often much more honest than slogans. But I don't want to say too much. The trend seems more solid, but the confirmation signals haven't fully emerged yet. ETF data is a lagging indicator, reflecting the upward trendIn February 2026, Waymo completed $16 billion in financing. Besides Alphabet, participants include Dragoneer, Sequoia Capital, Mubadala, and Temasek. The presence of sovereign capital, tech giants, and venture capital on the shareholder list indicates that driverless taxis have moved from technological experimentation to a phase of heavy asset expansion. According to data disclosed by Waymo, the company will complete 15 million rides by 2025; By early 2026, it will have completed over 20 million rides, with more than 400,000 weekly orders, covering six major U.S. metropolitan areas. The next step is to lay operational groundwork in more than twenty cities including Tokyo and London. Waymo's financing and operational data Meanwhile, Chinese companies are accelerating their overseas expansion. Baidu Apollo Go has launched fully driverless commercial operations in Dubai and entered markets such as London, Switzerland, and Hong Kong for testing; Pony.ai announced overseas plans and potential orders for over 4,000 vehicles, with plans to deploy over 2,000 vehicles in the European market through Uber. Baidu's Q2 2026 performance and Pony.ai overseas fleet plans A new product is emerging in urban transportation: robot drivers that can be replicated, dispatched, and earn revenue per kilometer. Twenty years of technology finally meet cities that can expand. The driverless driving boom can be traced back to the 2004 DARPA Challenge in the United States. At that time, not a single car completed desert tracks. A few years later, LiDAR, cameras, high-precision maps, and machine learning gradually matured, and Go$SOL This rally is beautiful!
But I want to be honest with you. On 8/25, SOL surged to around 101 (weekly gain of 25%+), with RSI at 90 indicating extreme overbought conditions. Technically, it's signaling "the easy money from this wave has already been made."
The backstory: Expected new SEC regulatory framework + a short squeeze clearing 4.6 billion in three days + ecosystem capital inflow (stablecoin supply on Solana reached 65.8 billion, TVL 5.55 billion).
But there's a detail you need to notice: liquid staking TVL rose 25% in a week, yet spot DEX volume dropped 21%. Money is shifting from trading to staking for yield, retail chasing memes, smart money withdrawing. Also, the Drift 295 million hack and Term Finance attack make security a hidden risk.
Technically, SOL has risen above the 50-day moving average (77.7) and 200-day moving average (81.3), with a short-term target of 98–100.
My advice: For those holding, take profits in batches above 100; for those wanting to enter, don’t chase the price between 95–100, wait for a pullback to 88–90 support, and reconsider the structure if it falls below 85.
Folks, SOL is very volatile but also prone to sharp corrections, so keep your position size within what you can sleep comfortably with. I am the mid-term intelligence guy.
#Strategy increased issuance to expand cash, BTC allocation pace under attention
First, about Strategy, this guy issued 18.26 million shares via ATM last week, raising 2 billion USD, but didn't buy a single $BTC, piling up cash to 6.69 billion, and conveniently repurchased discounted STRC preferred shares.
Seller is not chasing highs now; once the coin price returns above cost line, they stockpile ammo, waiting to buy discounted BTC or preferred shares again. The buying pace for coins is clearly braking.
#US initiates economic isolation on Iran, why did oil prices fall?
Looking at Iran, the US is implementing "economic isolation actions" with secondary sanctions. Logically supply should be tight, but Brent and WTI $CL actually dropped over 2%.
Why?
Earlier "buying on expectations" has already risen enough. This round is economic sanctions, not bombing the strait, not directly cutting Gulf exports. The Hormuz night shift still passes 16 million barrels, the positive factors are exhausted, and funds are exiting to take profits.
For a real reversal, we have to wait for Iran to block the strait; otherwise, oil prices will continue to give up premiums in the short term. $HYPE 80.13, +1.55%, just 4% away from the ATH of 83.34. This token bounced back directly from the 77 support level last week, and a breakout is right ahead.
The logic behind Hyperliquid keeps getting smoother: the top on-chain perpetual DEX, with 320 million in 24-hour trading volume, and buybacks funded by real cash. BTC rose 20% in a week, on-chain trading volume surged, and Hyperliquid, as the largest on-chain perpetual platform, directly benefits—trading volume up → revenue up → buybacks up → price up. This flywheel spins fast in a bull market.
Unlike UNI, HYPE has real revenue buybacks. Unlike OKB, it’s decentralized. This paradigm is unmatched in the entire market.
But the ATH of 83.34 is right above; the first time it touched 83, volume shrank and it pulled back. This time, it’s been sideways at 80-81 for two days, with volume increasing, like it’s gathering strength. If BTC holds above 80k and triggers an on-chain sentiment explosion, HYPE could very well hit a new high this week.
HYPE’s volatility is three times that of BTC, so position sizing should be about one-third of BTC’s. Should you chase the breakout above 83 or wait for a pullback? I choose to wait for the pullback 【Strategy raised $2B but didn't buy a single BTC】
Last week, Strategy sold about 18.26 million shares of $MSTR, raising approximately $2B, but its $BTC holdings remained at 840,447 coins, about 4% of the total supply.
Of the funds, $300M was used to replenish the USD Reserve, increasing it to $5.10B; another $136.4M was used to repurchase STRC, and the remaining approximately $1.59B went into a more flexible cash pool.
Peter Schiff also pinpointed the most sensitive issue: Strategy's YTD BTC Yield has dropped from 13.3% in May to -3.3%.
The cash pool can still be used to buy BTC in the future, so it’s not yet definitive that Strategy has abandoned increasing its holdings. But for MSTR shareholders, last week they endured dilution without an increase in BTC holdings, and some funds were used to support $STRC.
When capital allocation starts prioritizing cash reserves and preferred stock, has the original investment logic of MSTR—"issuing more shares to increase BTC per share"—changed?
If you had to choose, would you hold MSTR now or directly hold BTC? Hello everyone, I am the Big Prince with a great mindset 🐮
BTC's current rebound is strong, driven mainly by two core factors:
1. The U.S. Treasury has increased the scale of U.S. debt repurchases, causing Bitcoin and gold to rise in tandem, benefiting simultaneously as inflation-hedge assets. Nvidia's earnings report on Wednesday is a key macro turning point; if the report performs well, it could further boost the crypto sector and storage stocks.
2. BTC ETFs saw nearly $2 billion in net inflows last week, Coinbase's premium shifted from positive to negative, and retail sentiment changed from panic selling to actively buying the dip. This rally is driven by short squeezes combined with new spot market capital inflows.
Looking at the technical chart:
On the weekly level, last week closed with a strong bullish candlestick, engulfing several previous bearish candles, forming a bullish "door" pattern. Comparing with historical trends, the market may first test the previous high near 82,500 with a false breakout, then pull back to the gap with a long lower shadow, before officially starting a bull market.
BTC faces very strong resistance in the 82,000-83,000 range, where a large amount of previous trapped positions are concentrated. A one-time breakout is very difficult and will likely become a phase of pressure and reversal, with a significant risk of pullback on the daily chart. The previous rally was too fast, so a rapid correction of similar magnitude is also possible.
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 #美启动对伊经济孤立，油价为何回落？ $ETH is a bit risky this round ⚠️
In 15 minutes, it dropped directly from around 2500 to 2480, MACD turned bearish, and Coinglass long-short ratio fell from about 1.3 to 1.16, clearly showing bulls are starting to retreat.
More importantly: the daily RSI has surged to around 95, indicating severe short-term overheating; but the 15-minute RSI has already dropped to 20, meaning shorting here is also prone to a rebound.
My judgment: short-term bias is bearish, watch the 2480→2460 support; only if it breaks below is there a chance to continue weakening; if it stabilizes around 2480, be wary of a quick rebound.
No chasing longs at highs, no chasing shorts on sharp drops, wait for confirmation before entering. 📉How did ETH rise so much this week?
It went straight from 1900 to 2547, nearly +30% in a single week.
It wasn’t a slow climb; it was almost a vertical surge.
The core reasons are three things stacked together:
1. The US Treasury suddenly doubled the scale of long-term bond repurchases, releasing liquidity.
2. ETH spot ETFs had a net inflow of nearly $700 million in a week, with institutions buying real money.
3. A large-scale short squeeze, leveraged short positions liquidated, and passive buying directly pushed the price up.
A typical "macro easing + institutional inflow + short squeeze" triple play.
Now it has pulled back to around 2480 and is consolidating, which is normal digestion.
In the short term, whether 2500 can hold is key, and 2420 is a critical support level.
The rise was too rapid, so chasing the high carries significant risk.
But if the structure can hold after the pullback, this wave might not be over yet.
What do you think? Is this pulse over, or the start of a mid-term recovery?$SNDK is the "injured protagonist" in the storage sector today, but the mid-term view remains unchanged: wait for a full drop before buying.
On 8/24, SNDK closed at 1,493.12, down 6.45% (previous close 1,596); pre-market on 8/25 at 1,492, still down 6.5%; early Korean stocks on 8/25 were even worse, KOSPI -3%, Samsung -8.7%, Hynix -3.41%. YTD still +521%, 52-week high 2,354, this drop is profit-taking, not a breakdown in logic.
Citi remains bullish: NAND supply is tight, AI eSSD demand is exploding, August Investor Day provided a technology roadmap + capital return. SNDK is a core stock in the "storage supercycle."
But short-term pressures are threefold: Samsung shareholder returns below expectations, waiting for NVDA's 8/26 earnings guidance, PE 21.64 is not cheap. Good news is already priced in, don't catch a falling knife before earnings.NVIDIA and Marvell are like two AI report cards this week
The market is not unaware of the strong AI demand; the real question is: with such expensive capital expenditures, has the return actually started to materialize? NVIDIA focuses on upstream pricing power, Marvell focuses on custom chips and customer concentration. Together, these two answers form a more complete health check report.
If the earnings continue to exceed expectations, the AI chain can catch a breath; if only revenue looks good but profit and order quality don't keep up, the market will immediately start to nitpick.
Honestly, AI trading has passed the stage of "rising just because there's a story." Now every company has to do its homework: whoever can turn compute hunger into cash flow will stay; those who only talk about the future will have their valuations harshly corrected.
#财报观察员：英伟达领衔，AI回报进入验证期 The Jackson Hole annual meeting officially kicked off this week, with global markets focusing on a key figure—the new Federal Reserve Chair Wash. This is his first time standing in the spotlight at this annual policy forum since taking office, and every word he makes could become a pivot for pricing risk assets. After the July Federal Open Market Committee meeting, Wash still did not provide clear directional guidance. Market doubts about the transparency of Fed communications are accumulating, and this uncertainty is already reflected in prices. This time, he must answer at least one question: What data is the Fed focusing on to determine its next move? If the details remain vague, the fog over interest rate expectations will only deepen, and asset price volatility will become more volatile. The upcoming PCE price index, GDP revisions, and durable goods orders data to be released this week will directly test whether inflation remains stubborn. These figures are not just numbers on paper; they work together with Walsh's speeches to shape the market's short-term direction. In other words, relying solely on one piece of data or a single statement is not enough; the real pricing logic is the interaction between data and policy signals. Bitcoin has been continuously stalled and pulled back in the $79,500 to $80,000 range, currently fluctuating around $77,500. The price has already shown hesitation about the $80,000 mark through action, lacking willingness to continue pushing upward. The market is digesting the expected gap through consolidation, waiting for a new catalyst to break the balance. If Walsh's wording leans hawkish, emphasizing that inflation risks have not resolved, then $80,000 is very likely to be the current move#Strategy increases cash through additional issuance, BTC allocation pace under scrutiny
Is it turning bearish, or preparing a big move?
This time, it's not about how much $MSTR was sold, but that after receiving the money, Strategy chooses not to buy $BTC immediately.
Last week, the company sold about 18.26 million shares of MSTR, net raising about $2 billion, maintaining BTC holdings at 840,000 coins. They also added $1.59 billion USD Cash, bringing total USD reserves to $5.1 billion, with total USD liquidity close to $6.7 billion.
This looks more like building a safety cushion for themselves. In the past, Strategy's play was issuing stock, issuing bonds, and buying BTC.
Now they are putting cash, preferred stock, and BTC into a more complex capital structure. Especially with the $13.64 billion buyback of STRC, essentially reducing financing pressure rather than simply being bearish on BTC.
Strategy's biggest advantage now may no longer be the courage to buy BTC, but having enough cash on hand to wait for a big BTC drop.
If BTC continues to rise, this $1.59 billion is future buying ammunition.
If BTC suddenly pulls back, they won’t be forced to sell coins to replenish liquidity like in previous weeks.
I think in the short term, MSTR and BTC might show some divergence.
If BTC remains strong, Strategy is likely to restart buying coins.
If BTC pulls back, MSTR’s dilution pressure and capital structure will again become market focus.
Next, watch for when they actually start deploying this $1.5 billion into the market—that will be an important signal for the next round of BTC allocation rhythm.$BTC Short-term violent breakthrough of $80,000, with a intraday high of $81,100, a 24-hour increase of over 4%, a 7-day cumulative increase close to 26%, the Panic and Greed Index reaching the 74 greed range, daily RSI reaching 84, entering a severe overbought zone, with short-term volatility likely to amplify sharply. Spot BTC-ETF has seen large inflows for several consecutive days, combined with short stamping squeezes, with funds first flowing into Bitcoin itself, then spilling over to some altcoins with real business. $BICO Following the sector, funds have rallied for a rally. BICO belongs to the account abstraction and BTC security infrastructure track, with verifiable business transaction data on-chain, circulating supply reaching 98.29%, with almost no large team token unlock selling pressure. This is its core difference from CORE. In contrast, $CORE is also in the BTC-Fi sector, with the market dividend of Bitcoin's explosive breakthrough of 80,000 but very limited transmission. The current price still fluctuates around $0.025, with $0.026-0.028 being a heavy trapped resistance zone, and $0.024 serving as a life-or-death support level. Community sentiment instantly collapsed. Some people, seeing BTC break 80,000 and BICO surging, began to fantasize again that CORE might also explode; others, after repeated historical proofs, remained clear-headed: market dividends do not equal project dividends, narratives cannot be directly exchanged for token prices, CORE project social media accounts continue to paint big promises, continuing to hype BTCFi's grand future while avoiding on-chain revenue and token selling pressure BTEven the big shots can't escape chasing highs and selling lows?
Yesterday at $1210, I just took profits, making $1.95 million. This morning, I even pretended to place a bunch of low buy orders between $1030-$1060, but when I saw the rebound, I immediately canceled those orders and chased the rally, buying back at an average price of $1168, and even increased my position by 34%! Now the triple long position is floating with a 9.9% profit. It looks pretty good, but I feel something's off.
Notice one detail — the $1.95 million profit from yesterday wasn’t withdrawn at all; it was all added back into the same position. This guy used to be known for precise bottom-fishing and top-selling, so how did he turn into someone stubbornly holding onto a single asset? The liquidation price is $636, leaving nearly a $500 safety buffer, which is indeed stable, but the problem is, he’s put all his bullets on $SKHYNIX, not even diversifying his profits. Is this genuine confidence or just gambling?
Even more extreme, on the afternoon rebound of July 29, he chased in $31.38 million within half an hour, using the exact same tactic. Both times, he only acted after the rebound was confirmed, never bottom-fishing on the left side. To be clear, those low buy orders might just be for show; missing out is more painful for him than being stuck. Now he’s placed two more add-on orders between $1162-$1170 and wants to buy over $2 million more...
Combining these two identical strategies, this guy’s style is very clear: direction matters more than price. Once the rebound is confirmed, he jumps in first and talks later. The low-priced orders are just insurance.$ONDO's market is breaking through and pulling back at a critical level. The locked value of on-chain tokenized stocks and ETFs has just surpassed the $1 billion mark.
The on-chain catalog of spot assets has expanded to 440 securities, with 292,000 positions spread across more than 150,000 independent holders.
The derivatives market and secondary market are battling near support levels, with liquidity testing the absorption capacity of these on-chain real assets.
The accumulation of real assets at the protocol level provides a foundation for token liquidity, but cross-regional compliance restrictions still define the physical boundaries for incremental off-chain inflows.
If the pullback defense level continues to be supported by spot capital, the growth in on-chain stock liquidity will drive the market to further test previous highs.
If the defense level fails and incremental buying falls short of expectations, compliance frictions may accelerate the contraction of liquidity premiums.
When the scale of on-chain assets stops growing or even sees position outflows, the current liquidity expectations based on asset expansion will be directly disproven.
The most important variable to watch in the coming days is whether turnover at key support levels can continuously absorb the incremental resistance caused by compliance restrictions.
#美启动对伊经济孤立，油价为何回落？ #ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #英伟达加码Perplexity，AI资本闭环再受审视The US has launched a full blockade against Iran, so has the oil price been controlled? The real issue is the global refining capacity plummeting sharply!
Previously, the expectation of war pushed oil prices up by 7%, but now that the event has happened, bulls are cashing out and running. The market simply doesn't believe the US can completely seal off Iran; Iran has always sold oil through gray channels, and buyers will definitely take this opportunity to demand a big discount and secretly take delivery.
The real crisis is actually on the refining side. Nearly 20% of Middle East capacity has been halted due to the conflict, and Russia has banned exports. Now diesel prices in Europe have surged 70%, and the US can only rely on draining inventories to hold the line.
With winter approaching and demand surging, high energy costs will definitely push inflation to explode again.
It is expected that crude oil will fluctuate around $90 in the short term, but if Iran truly blocks the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices could surge back up at any time.
#美启动对伊经济孤立，油价为何回落？ #BTC breaks through $80,000, can it hold the new level?
BTC really hit eighty thousand
Last time at seventy-two thousand
I still thought it was a rebound, not a reversal
But in less than a week, it directly surged to eighty thousand
ETF net inflow last week was $1.9 billion
Setting the largest weekly inflow record in nearly ten months
Short covering plus spot buying, both pushing together
But don’t get carried away
The profit ratio of short-term holders has already soared
Platform inflows are also rising
Profit-taking pressure is building up
This surge is different from the last time it hit seventy-two thousand
Back then, it was only short covering, no ETF relay
Now there is continuous ETF net inflow, institutions are buying with real money
Strategy went from a loss of $9.5 billion to a profit of $4.7 billion within a week
BlackRock ETF is also continuously accumulating
$BTC Fundamental Research Report $FIL / Filecoin (DePIN) $3.20
Summary: Filecoin ($FIL) overall score 46/100, rating Early Stage Project, insufficient validation. Breaking down the three layers: company team has cash reserves, protocol network shows paid usage traces, token value capture has been realized.
Filecoin (token $FIL), DePIN sector. Leading decentralized storage. Competitors include AR, STORJ. Traditional compute rental giants like AWS, CoreWeave charge by GPU hour, with A100 monthly rent at $12,000-$25,000, expensive and high barrier. On-chain solutions fragment compute power for bidding, suppliers require no centralized approval, idle GPUs become available supply. Customer price $50-$500/month, settlement in USDC or fiat. Narrative-driven sector, usage drops 60-80% in bear markets. Positioned as an end-to-end vertical platform. Product deployment: protocol layer officially running, on-chain dashboard shows protocol fees accumulating, paid usage traces exist. Latest version not found, 60 valid commits in last 90 days.
User side: address MAU undisclosed, DAU undisclosed, 24h trading volume $80.00M, TVL not found. Wallet addresses do not equal natural person monthly active users; large addresses concentrated holdings overestimate real user count. Revenue side: user fees undisclosed, supplier income about 80-90% of user fees (to LPs and nodes), protocol treasury income $2.00M, token holder buyback and burn annualized no burn mechanism. 24h trading volume is business flow, not revenue. Company profit does not equal protocol profit, protocol profit does not equal token holder profit. Code side: 60 valid commits in 90 days, 25 active contributors, latest version not found. GitHub is grade A evidence for direct verification. Investment background: company equity financing checked via PitchBook/Crunchbase (grade A), token private/public sales via whitepaper, release schedule, and on-chain unlock contracts (grade A), market makers and ecosystem funding grade B—not representing long-term tech VC holdings, tech integration via API/SDK access evidence (grade B), strategic partnerships and logo walls grade D. NVIDIA GPU usage does not equal NVIDIA investment, exchange listing does not equal exchange strategic investment.
Token side: total supply 1,300,000,000, circulating 950,000,000 (73.1%), FDV $4.20B, next unlock 2026-Q4 (3.50% of circulating +), no clear annualized buyback burn. Must buy tokens to use product? Partially, medium value capture (staking/discount/governance). Compared with peers (uniform criteria, no cross-sector comparison): Circulating market cap: Filecoin $3.00B, AR undisclosed, STORJ undisclosed. FDV: Filecoin $4.20B, AR undisclosed, STORJ undisclosed. Annual revenue: Filecoin $2.00M, AR undisclosed, STORJ undisclosed. Monthly active addresses/users: Filecoin undisclosed, AR undisclosed, STORJ undisclosed. Figures based on public data snapshots; some missing data supplemented by official or industry sources. Valuation: circulating market cap $3.00B, FDV $4.20B, P/S 1500.0x, FDV to revenue 2100.0x. Pessimistic view $3.00B discounted 50-70%, neutral range oscillation, optimistic view revenue doubles, burn implemented, enterprise clients onboard, FDV P/S aligns with top players. Final judgment: insufficient evidence, narrative-driven (score 46/100). Token value capture realized (buyback/burn/Gas). Circulating market cap relatively expensive compared to fundamentals, expectations overdrawn, FDV moderate. Risk warnings: short-term large unlock dump, protocol income long-term zero, token demand relies only on incentives (if incentives stop, usage collapses). Continuous monitoring: protocol fees weekly, burn amount, active address retention, TVL/loan balance, GitHub version releases. Public data inference, not investment advice. Core indicator changes over 30% invalidate conclusions.
Fundamentals analyzed, market direction is another matter.
#FundamentalResearchReport #Crypto #Research #OKXOrbitAfter several years of AI surge, the industry has finally hit an extremely deadly hard wall—the "Memory Wall." At the recently held Hot Chips 2026, Micron released a set of data that sent chills down the spine of the entire AI industry: AI accelerator computing power triples every two years, while HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) bandwidth increases less than twice over the same period. The gap between computing power and storage is visibly widening at a rapid pace. Even more frightening, this wall not only blocks the upper limit of computing power output but is also directly collapsing the training ground for large models. Meta Steps into a Pitfall: 17% of Unexpected Interruptions Are Actually Because of It Previously, people thought large model training interruptions were mainly due to software bugs or GPU overheating, but Micron cited Meta's Llama 3 training test data to reveal the truth: among all unexpected training interruptions, about 17% are caused by HBM failures. As HBM stacks increase, any minor process defect or thermal stress damage can instantly paralyze training tasks costing tens of millions of dollars. Physical Limit Pressure: Three Major Crises of Area Consumption and Wafers The "Area Monster" of Shift: In the latest flagship packaging (2 GPUs integrated into 8 12-layer HBM4 stacks), HBM swallows nearly 90% of the system's semiconductor area, which is 8% of the GPU itself Gold is rising, US Treasury yields are climbing, so what exactly is BTC trading this time?
Brothers, according to the old textbooks, today should be the toughest environment for BTC:
Gold has surged to around $4,700, the 30-year Treasury yield remains above 5.2%, and funding costs have not significantly decreased, yet BTC has rallied from around 64,000 to 81,000. Is the market crazy, or are we misreading it?
I think this round of BTC trading is not about "rate cuts" but another matter—the repricing of the US dollar and US Treasury credit.
The US Treasury has expanded the scale of long-term bond repurchases, which the market interprets as: long-term yields cannot continue to rise indefinitely, and future debt may be diluted through liquidity and inflation. As a result, both gold and BTC are being bought simultaneously. The logic is no longer just risk appetite but scarce assets hedging fiat credit.
But there is also a warning signal here: if Treasury yields continue to break through 5.3%, it represents inflation heating up again rather than debt concerns, then BTC may revert to a high-volatility risk asset.
On the chart, BTC first needs to hold 80,000; above that, 81,280 is the short-term high. ETH stands above 2,500, indicating funds have not fully exited high Beta.
Holding 80,000 means BTC is trading credit risk; falling below 80,000, the story may turn into profit-taking at highs.
$BTC $ETH #BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 #BTC80KHoldOrFold Bitcoin has broken above $80,000 again, extending a rapid recovery supported by short covering and renewed institutional demand. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted approximately $1.92 billion last week, their strongest weekly inflow in nearly ten months. Unlike a purely liquidation-driven spike, the consecutive daily ETF inflows suggest that fresh capital is participating in the move. However, more short-term holders are now profitable, while increasing exchange deposits may indicate that some investors are preparing to sell. The next test is whether Bitcoin can hold $80,000 without depending on another wave of forced short covering. July PCE inflation, revisions to employment data and Kevin Warsh’s Jackson Hole speech could affect yields, the dollar and risk appetite. Continued ETF inflows and healthy spot volume would strengthen the argument that this is becoming a broader bull-market recovery. If flows slow while leverage rises, $80,000 could turn into a profit-taking zone. The level matters, but the quality of demand behind it matters more.Bitcoin moved first, and now the next variable in the market is whether altcoins will rotate. While BTC is hovering around $77,000, ETH's retest of the $2,400~2,500 range is already reflected in the price as part of a 'large-cap asset stabilization' phase. There are two variables the market has yet to reflect in the price. First, whether funds withdrawing from BTC and ETH are actually moving into small and mid-cap altcoins; second, whether those moves are temporary day trading or medium-term positioning. Currently, the buying pressure on stocks being discussed such as BEAT, BICO, KAITO, LAB, and SNDK is insufficient to confirm a turnover. Even based on trading volume and execution strength rather than price increases, the signals are still mixed. This is not a simple narrative of 'risk appetite recovery → alt rally,' but rather a stagnant state where the market acknowledges the range of large assets but has yet to find the next direction. Looking at the cross-market delivery structure, as long as BTC supports $77,000, the downside for altcoins is limited.SK Hynix repurchases 650,000 shares daily, and this repurchase will continue for about 2 months. After that, an even larger next wave of repurchases will begin. Currently, the daily trading volume is just over 3 million shares, meaning the daily repurchase accounts for 21.7% of the trading volume. The lower limit is gradually accumulated this way. $SKHY $SKHYNIX 📌BTC breaking through 80,000 is not surprising; holding steady still requires consolidation confirmation
BTC reaching the 80,000 mark was actually expected, but most likely it will consolidate and rest for two days before choosing the next direction.
This round of rally is driven by multiple positive factors resonating together: US Treasury repos pushing down long-term rates, a weaker dollar driving depreciation trades, spot ETF net inflows of $1.9 billion in a single week, combined with tens of billions of dollars in short squeeze liquidations, supported by macro, capital, and short squeeze forces — this is not an illogical random surge.
From a mid-term perspective, to truly hold above 80,000, the daily candle needs to close firmly above it. The 80,000-85,000 range gathers a large amount of previous trapped positions, with profit-taking and stop-loss selling pressure concentrated.
In terms of operation, firmly do not chase highs; the current position is a mid-term watershed, not a point for reckless entry.
For personal reference only, not investment advice, strictly control position size in contracts.
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口
#ETH触及2500美元后震荡
$BTC Let's talk about Pinduoduo and Amazon~ I still favor Amazon more.
Pinduoduo's Q2 revenue was 112.4 billion, only up 8% year-over-year, falling short of market expectations, and net profit dropped 12%. In the same week, Amazon's stock price surged 15% in a single day after its earnings report, with AWS growth at 37%. Two e-commerce giants: one seems to be in reverse gear, the other stepping on the accelerator.
Pinduoduo's problem lies overseas. Chen Lei himself said Temu is entangled with regulatory and compliance demands from various countries, facing new challenges in globalization, so they shifted their main focus back to domestic grocery shopping, aiming for 400 billion in revenue this year. Amazon, on the other hand, is fully capitalizing on AI infrastructure, raising its full-year capital expenditure to $220 billion. Even the Echo speaker prices were pushed up due to rising storage chip costs, passing on cost pressures.
One is fully benefiting from the AI dividend, the other is painfully hitting regulatory walls. If Pinduoduo's growth doesn't recover, the market's valuation logic will have to be reconsidered. #亚马逊市值破3万亿，500亿押注先赢一局 8.25 Is this the start of a new bull market or the last jump of the old bull market?
1. Previous bear market bottoms have appeared around the end of the year, but this time it's in the third quarter, much earlier than before.
2. Previous bear market bottoms were accompanied by stock index declines forming a bottom, but this time the stock index is at a new high.
3. Historically, only the last bull market saw BTC drop from 64,000 to 30,000 before reaching a new high again—also a halving, also bottoming in July, and the stock index was also near a new high.
Not necessarily rigidly sticking to old methods, but be cautious of this possibility Charge forward!
This wave of $BTC has indeed been thoroughly shaken out. After several months of sideways trading that wore down most holders, it surged from 64,000 directly to break through 80,000 with strong volume, showing clear short squeeze characteristics—about $4.5 billion in short leverage across the market was liquidated in the past three days, and this forced buying further pushed prices up.
More importantly, $ETH funds are genuinely flowing back in real money. Last week, 13 spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US saw a net inflow of $1.92 billion, hitting a 10-month high, with BlackRock's IBIT alone attracting $1.3 billion in a single week. Coupled with the US Treasury expanding long-term bond repurchases and improved regulatory expectations, the money is returning.
As for $OKB, I bought in at 152 and have held since. Watching it drop from a high of 258 has been tough, but with a current market cap just over $2.1 billion and a fully circulating supply, in the context of this round of institutional capital inflow, the cost-performance ratio isn't bad. The key is whether BTC can hold steady, as it determines the ceiling for the entire market. $BTC $ETH $OKB
$BTC 80,000, finally it happened, Bitcoin touched it.
But now I'm actually not as excited as I was a few days ago.
The reason is simple: $BTC went straight from over 60,000 to 80,000, and what really changed is not just the price, but everyone's attitude.
When it was over 60,000, the market was full of "bear market is coming," "it will be halved again," "50,000 is the bottom."
Now that it hit 80,000, some are shouting 100,000, 120,000, even feeling "if you don't get on board now, it'll be too late."
This is exactly what I'm most cautious about.
This round is indeed very strong; last week BTC's weekly increase exceeded 22%, marking one of the largest weekly USD gains in history; during today's push to 80,000 USD, a large number of shorts were directly liquidated, with 24-hour short liquidations exceeding 220 million USD.
But don't forget:
The fastest rise is often when FOMO is the worst.
Personally, I won't blindly turn bullish just because it broke 80,000.
Next, I want to watch two things: first, whether BTC can truly hold above 80,000, not just spike and fall back; second, whether funds will start to spread from BTC to ETH and altcoins.
If 80,000 holds, and ETH and altcoins follow, then the market will really feel comfortable.
If #BTC charges alone and altcoins continue to lie dormant, I will be more cautious.
So my personal view is simple:
No one dared to buy at 60,000, and at 80,000, don't forget the risks just because you're afraid of missing out.
The cruelest part of this market is never that it can't go up.
But rather—once it goes up, you suddenly want to go all in; the biggest taboo in crypto is chasing highs and selling lows!
$ETH $OKB #BTC breaking through 80,000 USD, can it hold the new level $CORE Harsh Reality: BTC Soars Wildly, It Drops 99.78%
Remember February 8, 2023, the day CORE launched? BTC was only at 190,000, and CORE surged to 6.9U that day.
Riding on the halo of the Bitcoin ecosystem and the overwhelming BTCFi stories, countless people were fooled into entering the market with full faith, all thinking they could ride the big bull market wave and get a share.
The dramatic reality is right before our eyes.
$BTC skyrocketed, reaching over 800,000 at its peak, and still holds steady around 540,000, lifting the entire Bitcoin sector.
In contrast, $CORE is now only around 0.025, having dropped 99.78% from its highest point.
Clinging tightly to the Bitcoin narrative as a talisman, constantly mentioning BTC ecosystem dividends.
While the big bull market rages on, it gets none of the benefits; when the market rises, it falls alone; when the market fluctuates, it dives.
If this BTC derivative logic really held true, under Bitcoin’s epic rally, how could it end up nearly zero?
The slogans are loud, but the market gives the coldest answer with real money.
The market opportunity has been given, external dividends are right in front of us.
Without users, without business, without a real on-chain ecosystem, no matter how glamorous the Bitcoin story is, it can’t stop the token’s continuous collapse.
Don’t use a distant future to self-hypnotize over the current brutal market.
⚠️ The above is only a personal market review and reflection, not any investment advice. The crypto market is extremely risky; please view the market rationally. The financial market on August 25 is appearing a rather interesting paradox: geopolitical tensions have not disappeared, but oil prices have fallen sharply, while Bitcoin and some crypto assets continue to rise. Brent fell by more than 2% in the previous session and continued to fall by about 1% in the August 25 session, to around $91.27 per barrel; WTI also fell by about 0.9% to $84.25 per barrel. The market seems to assess that the new sanctions have not yet created an immediate oil supply shock. This is an important point when Bitcoin has already reached 80,000, while OKB is still stuck below 120, and many people are asking why.
To put it simply, these two are fundamentally different.
BTC is currently driven by the "national strategic reserve" narrative, with institutional funds, ETFs, and national buying—none of which are related to OKX.
OKB is a platform token, so it depends on: how well the exchange business is doing, whether new users are coming in, and how hot the new token launch events are.
The reality is that OKX has been suppressed by Binance this year, with no increase in market share. Concepts like Web3 wallets and on-chain trading have already been hyped and the market is now immune.
Technically, OKB has been oscillating between 100-120 for a long time, with a lot of trapped positions above. Without a new story, funds are unwilling to push it up. 90% of coins are rising, yet top market makers hold $160 million in short positions; this is not bearish betting, but passive order absorption.
TradingBeats monitoring shows that among the 76 main perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid with over $1 million trading volume in the past 24 hours, 66 rose, accounting for about 86.8%, with a median increase of 4.6%. BTC rose 1.8%, ETH rose 2.7%, and some altcoins rose over 10%.
Strangely, three market maker addresses labeled Wintermute, Cumberland, and Auros collectively hold about $230 million in short positions, with long positions only about $9.93 million, resulting in a net short exposure of about $220 million and an unrealized loss of about $6.92 million. Wintermute alone holds 61 short positions worth about $163 million, with ETH, BTC, SOL, and HYPE accounting for nearly $100 million.
But they are not betting on direction.
The order book structure makes it clear: Wintermute currently has 1,718 orders, with 854 sell orders and 864 buy orders, covering 77 contracts, 74 of which have two-way quotes; Auros has the same market-making structure. They are quoting normally as market makers, not making one-sided directional bets.
The real reason is the one-sided market rally. As aggressive buyers continuously consume sell orders, market makers, as counterparties, are forced to sell more contracts, naturally causing perpetual inventory to tilt toward shorts. The $160 million short position essentially reflects the rising market pushing risk inventory onto liquidity providers.
So don’t interpret this as "smart money shorting." Market makers earn from spreads, not direction — but when the market is too one-sided, they have to bear this inventory. As of this writing, Wintermute has already started covering short positions and reducing net short exposure.On-chain data shows that some whales continue to transfer BTC into exchanges, indicating an increased willingness to cash out. The inflow of funds into spot ETFs is also starting to weaken, with chips gradually shifting to retail investors.
From a macro perspective, inflation remains sticky, and expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts are continuously being postponed, with the possibility of maintaining high interest rates for a longer period. BTC is highly correlated with the Nasdaq; if U.S. tech stocks experience a pullback, the crypto market will likely fall even harder.
In the coming months, a one-sided rally is unlikely, with a high probability of a weak consolidation and significant correction risk. It is not advisable to heavily chase gains at this stage; try to avoid leverage and keep more cash on hand to cope with volatility. LAB is down nearly 48% since Aug. 1, while $BEAT fell from $6 highs under real token-unlock pressure—including a $67.8M release on Aug. 1.
But here’s the part worth watching: not every deep drawdown ends the same way.
The ZEC comparison doesn’t fully hold up either. Its breakout was backed by a real ETF catalyst, not simply “hard consolidation.”#BTC80KHoldOrFold #IranSanctionsOilFalls #StrategyBuildsCash With the rapid rebound of $BTC and $ETH, the altcoin market, which had been quiet for a while, is becoming active again, and the DeFi sector has performed impressively in this round of rebound. So which ones truly benefit token holders? If you only look at protocols for making money, you'll definitely fall into traps. Today, I'll use data to see which tokens are worth our attention and which ones should be avoided. 1. DeFi is shifting from "hyping narratives" back to "buying cash flow" Currently, the total value locked in DeFi across the network TVL has rebounded to $88.772 billion: Here, three scenarios need to be distinguished: 1. Rising TVL + simultaneous rise in stablecoin market cap = incremental funds entering the market, which benefits the DeFi sector; 2. TVL rises, but stablecoins don't; it's just the floating profit from BTC/ETH price hikes, which is a "paper boom"; 3. If TVL drops rapidly, it often signals liquidation on-chain and declining market risk appetite. Stablecoin market cap hasn't increased significantly, but there are subtle signs of a turning point. Combining the three scenarios I mentioned above, it's clear that this DeFi data rebound is driven by price increases for Bitcoin and Ethereum. However, related DeFi protocol revenues have recently surged, and I think the turnaround of incremental funds may be seen in the next 30-60 days. Therefore, we must do our homework and plan ahead. Next, let's look at the most direct data: the DeFi sector now has a number of protocols capable of steadily generating millions of dollars in monthly revenue120,000 → 58,000 → 80,000: Has the bottom really passed, or is this just a brief breather halfway up the mountain 🤔🤔?
To be honest, I feel really conflicted right now.
Looking back at history, there have been four major bear markets. Even the mildest one saw a retracement of 77%. Starting from 120,000, the theoretical low should have at least touched 27,000, and in extreme cases even 18,000. Now the lowest point only dropped to 58,000 and rebounded to 80,000. No matter how you look at it, it seems like just a pause during a downtrend.
Looking at the time cycle, previous bear markets bottomed out over at least a full year. Looking back at this round, how long has it really been? If 58,000 is the final bottom, then this bear market is too mild, so mild that I feel uneasy and can’t easily believe it.
But then I ask myself: Can the old historical patterns really still apply to the current market?
ETF funds keep flowing in continuously; Wall Street pension funds and hedge funds are putting real money into the market; the supply contraction from the halving hasn’t fully played out yet. Also, the drop to 58,000 came with huge turnover volume, and many long-term institutional holders repositioned and built new positions at that level.
It can’t be that all these smart players with massive resources are wrong in their judgment.
This is where the contradiction lies. If 58,000 is truly the bottom, then why is the rebound to 80,000 repeatedly suppressed, making it hard to push further up?
If 80,000 is the start of a new rally, why is the volume weakening and market enthusiasm cooling down? Even the most optimistic analysts only cautiously talk about a steady rise; no one dares to boldly call for new all-time highs.
You’ll find that the bullish arguments make sense, and the bearish logic also holds.
This is the most tormenting phase of the market, presenting bearish evidence on one side and bullish signals on the other, leaving people stuck in the middle, swaying back and forth. Bears believe history always repeats itself; bulls insist "this time is different." Both sides don’t understand each other and think the other is ridiculous.
I’m slowly feeling that reality might lie somewhere in between.
It’s neither the ultimate bottom that causes despair and widespread panic, nor the grand start of a bull market. It’s more like a chaotic zone where bulls and bears are strangling each other.
From here, it can pull up to 90,000 or 100,000, tempting you to chase higher; or it can drop back to 60,000 or even 50,000, forcing you to cut losses painfully and exit.
What we really need to be wary of isn’t the number 80,000 itself. It’s that everyone is trapped in a binary choice: Will it break below 58,000? Can it hold above 80,000?
Once the market decides on one direction, the opposite leveraged positions will be liquidated en masse, and the ensuing volatility will be so intense it will exceed most people’s psychological tolerance.
So I no longer dare to make definitive conclusions like before, saying "it’s not the bottom yet." This market beast is best at punishing overconfident people.
It could very well stop falling at 58,000 and slowly oscillate upward; or it could first rally to 85,000 to create a bull trap, then crash hard back to 40,000.
I’m no longer guessing the outcome.
Right now, 80,000 is neither a ticket to bull market paradise nor a notice of falling into the abyss. It’s just a crossroads repeatedly tugging at human nature.
Keep a clear head and hold some ammunition.
Don’t go all in, don’t completely exit and watch, don’t stubbornly take one side. Wait for the market to reveal its cards, then follow its lead.
Accepting that the market itself is full of unknowns, forcing yourself to pick a side is meaningless. This is probably the best mindset to face such a torn market.
$BTC #BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 Bitcoin has just shown the market that demand is back, with spot ETF inflows recording one of their strongest weeks of 2026, but here is the part I think many traders are overlooking: strong inflows after a major rally do not automatically mean the trend is safe. The real test is whether this demand can continue when the excitement cools down. If institutions keep buying while BTC consolidates, that would tell us something very different from a rally driven mainly by short covering and momentBessent's real scheme: forcing a short squeeze on U.S. Treasuries CTA, pushing the 10-year yield down to 4.3%?
Bessent is accused of artificially driving up bond prices through Treasury repo operations and debt structure adjustments, triggering large-scale passive covering by CTA trend funds (whose current short positions are near historical extremes), forcibly suppressing the 10-year yield to 4.3%, thereby gaining political leverage for the Trump administration. Goldman Sachs estimates that if bond prices rise by 2 standard deviations, the covering scale will set a historical record.Since its launch in October last year, Trade.xyz's perpetual contracts for oil, indices, and pre-IPO assets on HL have reached a cumulative trading volume of about $500B. This number is huge, but it still comes down to the same old question: how does trading volume translate into token value capture? Without clarity on how much fees the platform collects, who the revenue belongs to, whether users are trading repeatedly, how high the market-making costs are, and whether regulations will change the product structure, no matter how high the trading volume is, it only reflects the platform's prosperity and has nothing to do with the users.The market is clearly stratifying with three main assets taking on distinct roles. BTC remains a solid pillar as ETF inflows continue, pushing the price from 60,000 USD to around 79,800 USD, suitable for a long-term core position. ETH is breaking out thanks to the wave of institutionalization as the spot ETF recorded a net inflow of about 699 million USD during the week, the highest level of the year, driving the price from 1."Korean retail investors just redeemed 1 billion from SK Hynix, and exchanges immediately offered a 20x leverage meat grinder"
Korean funds were just forced by regulators to withdraw nearly $1 billion from SK Hynix and Samsung leveraged ETFs, and crypto exchanges turned around and loaded this liquidity into 20x leveraged derivative meat grinders.
Binance pushed all 2x SK Hynix long/short and semiconductor ETFs onto the order book at once. Buying leveraged ETFs through traditional brokers requires completing 5 days of simulated trading. Nearly $1 billion was forced out this month, with trading volume plummeting 90%. But on crypto exchanges, there is no review process and no price limit restrictions.
This is not about providing a channel to US stocks; it is a cross-market liquidity dimensionality reduction strike.
Traditional 2x leveraged ETFs inherently suffer daily rebalancing mathematical volatility decay. Now exchanges have added a 20x leverage layer, directly amplifying the underlying volatility by 40 times. US stocks trade only 6.5 hours daily. If a chip black swan event breaks out overnight, market makers can use 20x leverage to preemptively dump positions in the crypto space.
While traditional finance is still struggling with how to set controls to cool down, crypto exchanges have already transformed US stock targets into 24/7 cash machines using 20x leverage. $BTC The bull market is here, can $BTC hold steady at 80,000 and continue to break through?
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口
At the time of writing, Bitcoin is around $80,659, having reached a high of $81,104 and dipped to a low of $76,891. It swung more than four thousand dollars within a day, so this bullish candle does look very satisfying. But to say that $80,000 is already stable, I think it's still a bit early.
This rise isn't purely driven by sentiment. Last week, the US spot Bitcoin ETF saw net inflows for five consecutive trading days, totaling about $1.92 billion. These buy orders have supported the market, but Bitcoin has already risen more than 20% in a week. Those who made profits earlier want to cash out, and the newly leveraged buyers are easily shaken out, so the intraday spikes and dips are normal.
I'm not looking at many fancy indicators right now; mainly waiting to see how the $79,500 to $80,000 range behaves. If the price can hold after a pullback, then $80,000 will slowly turn from previous resistance into support. After surpassing today's high of $81,104 again, the market will have reason to look toward around $84,000.
But if it breaks through and then falls back below $79,000, and ETF inflows start to slow, I won't insist this is just a shakeout. It might need to retest around $77,000 again.