Orbit Post Sitemap
#BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖
This trading volume is making me doze off!
BTC trading volume has shrunk as if no one is playing, and the price range is the narrowest in months. Bulls are playing dead, bears aren't exerting force, and the whole market is just waiting for that ETF money to come to the rescue.
But can ETFs really save it? In July, BTC ETF net inflows only accounted for 0.34% of the fund size, while ETH did 3.19%.
There is money, but it's all flowing to Ethereum. And don't forget, BTC ETF inflows now come from three types of people: hedge funds, registered advisors, and long-term institutions. Hedge funds are quick in and out, coming in today and leaving tomorrow, not really here to support the bottom. The real long-term institutions that can support the bottom? They're still watching.
What's even more painful is that the once most stable buyer strategy has been selling coins for four consecutive weeks. Even the most stubborn believers are offloading, so how can retail investors dare to rush in?
Honestly, ETF buying coming back is just a matter of time, but expecting it to immediately rocket BTC? That's wishful thinking. With trading volume shrinking this much, either it stays sideways forever or a big bullish or bearish candle will directly change the trend.
I haven't moved my position, holding spot, neither adding nor cutting losses. I'll wait for volume to pick up before making moves; chasing rises and falls in a low-volume market is the easiest way to get slapped by both sides.
What do you think? Is this volume contraction a buildup for a big move or is the market really cooling off? Let's debate in the comments!The latest data from Miner Weekly on August 17 is out.
The actual operating hash rate of listed Bitcoin mining companies is 368.3 EH/s in Q4 2025, dropping to 319 EH/s by Q2 2026, a decrease of 13.4%.
During the same period, the total Bitcoin network hash rate only dropped by 10.6%, so the decline rate of listed mining companies is much faster than the entire network.
If we exclude Bitdeer, which is still expanding, the decline among the remaining mining companies is even more dramatic — from 324.6 EH/s down to 255.9 EH/s, a 21.2% drop in half a year.
What are these companies doing if they are no longer mining? Core Scientific’s data center hosting revenue in Q2 this year was $136.7 million, while Bitcoin mining revenue was only $27.5 million. Hosting revenue is five times mining revenue. TeraWulf is similar, with AI high-performance computing rental income of $31.9 million and mining income of $12.8 million.
Riot Platforms and Bitdeer are still relying mainly on mining, but they are the minority. Most listed mining companies’ main business is no longer Bitcoin mining; it’s renting power and facilities to AI companies.
Miner holdings are also decreasing simultaneously. On August 15, the Bitcoin balance in miners’ wallets dropped to 1,191,900 coins, the lowest point since May 31. That’s 885 fewer than a week ago. The Puell Multiple is 0.75, not yet in the extremely undervalued range. Miners are still selling, but not at a fast pace, so it’s not a panic sell-off.
The miners’ shift to AI is not a short-term phenomenon. Hash rate may continue to decline. For BTC price, the short-term impact is sustained selling pressure; in the long term, if hash rate continues to decline, network security and market confidence will be affected. But miners have found a more profitable business than mining, so they won’t be coming back anytime soon.
$BTC Swiss banking giant UBS increased its call option exposure on the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF IBIT from 80,000 underlying shares at the end of March to 1,950,000 shares as of June 30.
This is an increase of more than 24 times.
Direct holdings of IBIT shares also rose by 12% to 407,890 shares, valued at approximately $13.6 million. Meanwhile, the put option exposure decreased by about 53%.
A Swiss bank with a 160-year history is heavily betting on BTC's rise through the options market. Instead of buying the spot ETF to capture gains, it is using options leverage to amplify exposure.
At the same time, Tudor Investment, under Paul Tudor Jones, also filed a 13F with the SEC showing holdings of 688,529 IBIT shares as of June 30, an 18.9% increase from the previous quarter.
One bank increased its position 24-fold using options, while a hedge fund increased its spot holdings by 18%. Two sources of capital, two different tools, but the same direction. The 63,000 level has been consolidating for a long time; sellers are being exhausted, and buyers are waiting. But the positioning cycle for institutions like UBS is measured in quarters, not days. Their positions have already been adjusted.
$BTC Bitcoin's 7-day implied volatility has dropped below the 30% threshold, down to 25%.
This is similar to the low volatility period in the summer of 2023.
After that low volatility in summer 2023, BTC experienced a doubling rally in the following months.
Low implied volatility means options are cheap. BIT analysts proposed a spot alternative strategy — sell part of the Bitcoin spot holdings and replace them with bull call spreads or directly buy call options. The maximum loss is limited to the option premium, and the freed-up funds can earn interest elsewhere.
The logic of this strategy is: if the price continues to move sideways or decline, the loss is only the option premium, not the principal. If the price breaks upward, the leveraged gains from call options are much higher than holding spot. The strategy has been selling coins for four consecutive weeks, while UBS and Tudor are buying call options. One side is reducing positions, the other is leveraging with options. Both are doing different things at the same price.
The turning point is imminent. Two signals appear simultaneously — implied volatility has dropped to historical lows, and top institutions are significantly increasing bullish positions with options. These two events happened simultaneously once in the summer of 2023, when BTC was still above 20,000. $BTC Star Island Financial News sent out a brief this morning: Bitcoin has just reclaimed $63,000, up 0.19% intraday.
The price has bounced back from around 62,500 on August 14.
But if you only look at the price, you'll miss what's really happening — in the past 24 hours, the entire market has liquidated only $7.44 million in leveraged positions, with shorts liquidated at twice the amount of longs. Bitcoin's own liquidation amount is $3.08 million, of which shorts account for $2.46 million, or 80%. Shorts are bleeding, longs are not chasing, both sides are pulling back, but the direction is indeed leaning toward the longs. The price has risen, volume hasn't followed, but shorts are definitely retreating.
The Fear and Greed Index has fallen back to 31, still in the "Fear" zone. Market sentiment is not optimistic, but the price hasn't dropped. It's been sideways for almost a month; buyers aren't strong, sellers haven't dumped. Both sides are waiting for direction, waiting for the catalyst that will break the deadlock.
$BTC 10x Research released an analysis today, stating that Bitcoin trading volume has significantly shrunk to well below historical peak levels, and the price has entered the narrowest volatility range in months.
They made a judgment — historically, this pattern usually signals an imminent directional breakout.
Implied volatility in the options market has dropped to a rare low, ETF inflows remain sluggish, and stablecoins are continuously experiencing net outflows. These signals all point to one thing: the market is compressing, capital is on the sidelines, and the direction will be chosen soon.
The most worth pondering is the change in MicroStrategy's stance. Data from 10x Research shows that the company has turned to net selling for four consecutive weeks. More specific data from Zhizhong Finance indicates that in the past two weeks, MicroStrategy sold about 3,327 bitcoins.
CEO Phong Le predicted on X that the crypto market will rebound in the fall, yet the company is quietly offloading. Talking bullish but selling with their hands. This inconsistency is more worth analyzing than any candlestick. Wall Street folks call this "say-do gap," which in plain terms means — even they might not be confident themselves.
$BTC The CLARITY Act in Washington has been postponed until after September, and the Senate has entered recess without advancing the legislation.
The SEC's scheduled crypto regulatory rules meeting on August 14 was suddenly canceled.
The commissioners were supposed to discuss the Reg Crypto proposal, including how companies can raise funds through tokens and how to exit SEC regulation after issuing digital assets. However, the meeting was canceled, and no rescheduled date was provided. The SEC attributed the cancellation to a "scheduling conflict," but since the timing coincides with the CLARITY Act recess, the market can't help but think negatively. Both paths are blocked simultaneously.
Bitcoin has dropped from 65,000 at the beginning of August to 62,500 and is now stabilizing around 63,000. The stability at 63,000 is largely because the market is still waiting for a clear regulatory direction. BlackRock, Fidelity, and Franklin Templeton have been buying over the past few months—not at current prices, but based on expectations after regulatory implementation. If the CLARITY Act and SEC rulemaking continue to be stalled, the 63,000 level may continue to consolidate or even decline further. $BTC The continuous inflow of $ETH ETF funds is currently the strongest support logic.
However, the price has yet to show strong momentum, indicating that on-exchange trading and leveraged funds are not convinced or are waiting for a clearer breakout signal.
Expansion and privacy advancements are "slow variables."
They determine ETH's competitiveness three years from now but hardly explain why it rises or falls tomorrow.
So the current ETH is more like:
• Has mid-to-long-term allocation logic (ETF + technical roadmap)
• Lacks explosive independent momentum in the short term
Before the market has a clear direction, ETH will most likely continue to follow BTC's fluctuations, with little chance of an independent main rally.
In short
Institutions are buying, retail investors are waiting, and the price is consolidating.
The real opportunity often appears when the consolidation wears down most people's patience. This morning, I reviewed the charts of the three major storage giants and finally understood the complete pattern of this collective rally.
Initially, SanDisk's Investor Day release of earnings and buyback plans was just a positive catalyst for a single stock, but it ultimately sparked a buying wave across the entire storage sector. SanDisk, SK Hynix, and Micron consecutively broke out of their sideways ranges and started to rally.
$SNDK is currently leading the pack at 1726.80, reaching an intraday high of 1775.75, breaking out with volume above the long-standing 1640 consolidation level. The MACD bullish crossover is wide open, clearly marking it as the leading stock targeted by capital. As long as the 1690 breakout support holds, the uptrend is unlikely to end easily; $SKHYNIX is steadily following the rhythm around the 1200 level, pulling back slightly after hitting 1205, with volume gradually increasing without overheating, showing a more composed trend; $MU at 992.67 is lagging but catching up, just breaking out of its consolidation range, with the MACD golden cross just forming and bullish momentum not yet fully unleashed.
Although the three companies' price movements have diverged, their pace is consistent: the leader expands the height first, followed by the other two catching up in sequence. This is the most typical characteristic of a sector rally. Looking back, some were hesitant to position in SanDisk near 980, and now the recent rally has created a significant price gap, inevitably causing some regret for missing out.
Currently, all three stocks are in a profit-taking phase after their breakouts. Instead of chasing intraday highs to accelerate the rally, it's better to monitor their respective support levels separately: watch 1690 for SanDisk, hold 1180 support for SK Hynix, and use 980 as the bull-bear dividing line for Micron. Since the sector trend has already emerged, as long as prices don't fall back into the previous long-term consolidation box, the AI-driven storage theme still has room to continue. Patiently holding and observing the strength of the breakout continuation is much safer than chasing highs to enter.The latest Miner Weekly report from BlockBridge Consulting shows that the actual operational hash rate of publicly listed Bitcoin mining companies dropped from 368.3 EH/s in Q4 2025 to 319 EH/s in Q2 2026, a 13.4% decrease over six months. During the same period, the average hash rate of the entire Bitcoin network only fell by 10.6%. The decline rate of listed mining companies is much faster than that of the whole network.
If we exclude Bitdeer, which is still expanding, the decline among the remaining mining companies is even more dramatic — from 324.6 EH/s down to 255.9 EH/s, a 21.2% drop in six months.
What are these companies doing if they are no longer mining? In Q2 this year, Core Scientific’s data center hosting revenue was $136.7 million, while its core Bitcoin mining revenue was only $27.5 million. Hosting revenue is five times the mining revenue. TeraWulf is similar, with AI high-performance computing rental income of $31.9 million and mining income of $12.8 million. Riot Platforms and Bitdeer still rely mainly on mining, but they are now the minority.
Miner holdings are also declining simultaneously. On August 15, the Bitcoin balance in miners’ wallets dropped to 1.1919 million BTC, the lowest point since May 31. CoinShares expects that by the end of 2026, AI and high-performance computing businesses may contribute 70% of the revenue for listed mining companies.
Most publicly listed mining companies’ main business is no longer Bitcoin mining; it is renting power and facilities to AI companies. Mining is transforming from a Bitcoin mining industry into an industry renting computing power to AI companies. The direct impact on BTC is sustained selling pressure. In the long term, if hash rate continues to decline, network security and market confidence will be affected. However, miners have found a more profitable business than mining and are unlikely to return in the short term. $BTC Ethereum ETFs are outperforming Bitcoin ETFs, and the gap is quite significant.
DWF Labs posted some data on X. In June, Ethereum ETFs had a net outflow of 4.65% of fund size, while Bitcoin ETFs had 8.09%. In July, Ethereum ETFs saw a net inflow of 3.19% of fund size, compared to only 0.34% for Bitcoin ETFs. The former is 9.4 times the latter. In May, institutions generally lacked interest in Ethereum, but this trend reversed in recent weeks.
Another set of data also confirms this trend. As of the week ending August 17, Bitcoin spot ETFs had a net outflow of $385.2 million, which is 128 times the outflow of Ethereum ETFs. Fidelity's FBTC redeemed $153 million in one week, Grayscale's GBTC saw an outflow of $88.3 million, and BlackRock's IBIT had an outflow of $78.96 million. Interestingly, Grayscale's low-fee Bitcoin Mini Trust attracted an inflow of $75.98 million — it's not that institutions are fully withdrawing, but rather moving from expensive shares to cheaper ones.
Bitcoin spot ETFs closed the weekend at $63,044, with a 24-hour trading range of $62,670 to $63,310. Grayscale's GBTC is seeing outflows, but its Mini Trust is seeing inflows; BlackRock's IBIT is seeing outflows, but its ETHA is still seeing inflows. The same issuer, two products, two directions.
Funds are moving from expensive products to cheaper ones, from BTC ETFs to ETH ETFs. Market news on August 17 shows that Ethereum ETFs have had inflows outperforming Bitcoin ETFs for two consecutive months. Bitcoin ETF outflows may continue for some time until the regulatory framework becomes clear. $BTC The CEO of the World Gold Council said Bitcoin will go to zero, and CZ's response is very interesting.
David Tait said at the Consensus conference in Miami: "Personally, I believe Bitcoin's value will go to zero." But he immediately followed with a statement that made both sides awkward: "People who have gold in their portfolio should also hold Bitcoin, and those who hold Bitcoin must allocate gold. Because these two assets can balance each other during crises."
CZ's response is even more thought-provoking. He said many people have made wrong judgments about cryptocurrency in the past, understanding this field takes time, but he cannot be 100% sure he is right, after all, everyone makes mistakes. One of the most influential people in the industry admitting he can be wrong is closer to the real market situation than any price analysis.
Bitcoin is hovering around 63,000, and the World Gold Council's collapse prediction is being tested by the market. When Tait said this in May, BTC was around 77,500, and since then it has dropped about 19%. On the same day, the Korean market recorded a -0.28% inverse kimchi premium. Korean retail investors are selling at a discount.
Gold has risen, BTC neither fell nor rose. At the 63,000 level, the Gold Council's CEO calls for zero, CZ says he can be wrong, and both stand by their positions telling the truth. The market is temporarily paused at this price, waiting for the next wave direction. $BTC I believe that the main capital flow in the crypto market is very likely to rotate from BTC to assets like ETH, rather than just waiting passively during BTC's low volatility. The most direct basis for this judgment is where the money is flowing. Look at the data from July: the net inflow ratio of ETH spot ETFs is actually 9.4 times that of BTC. This indicates that institutions' appetite has changed; they are no longer only focused on Bitcoin, the "old bread." Although BTC looks lifeless with trading volume shrinking sharply, my trader friends have been talking about ETH's catch-up rally logic recently, and the sentiment is clearly more active. However, I haven't completely cleared my BTC position, since UBS was still increasing its bullish IBIT options in Q2. This kind of "openly repairing the plank road while secretly crossing the Wei River" operation by big institutions shows they are still laying traps. So my current strategy is: allocate 60% of my short-term positions to ETH to seek excess returns. The remaining 40% BTC base position remains untouched as defense, waiting for the next breakout signal. For ordinary players, now is definitely not the time to lose patience during the sideways consolidation of BTC and ETH. Watching the capital flow to make switches might be much smarter than stubbornly holding onto one asset without moving. #BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖 On-chain asset recovery is evolving from single-chain blockade to a multi-chain cat-and-mouse game. In the KelpDAO attack, after about $71 million worth of ETH-related funds on Arbitrum were frozen, the attacker did not sit idly by but quickly changed tactics: using THORChain to transfer part of the stolen funds from Ethereum to Bitcoin. It has been confirmed that about $1.5 million has been moved via $BTC, and another $78,000 has been transferred via the privacy tool Umbra. This trend is worth careful consideration. In the past, after hackers succeeded, common tactics involved mixing coins, cross-chaining, and changing addresses, but mostly within the EVM ecosystem. This time, the difference lies in the attacker actively transferring funds to a network with almost no freezing capability. Although DeFi in the ETH ecosystem is booming, stablecoin issuers, cross-chain bridges, and project teams all hold certain freezing rights. The blacklist mechanism severely reduces the liquidity of illicit funds—the $71 million freeze is a prime example. BTC lacks these switches; once funds enter the Bitcoin network, on-chain governance basically cannot reach out. Therefore, BTC can be seen as the "final stop" in the hacker money laundering chain: first quickly monetizing and dispersing within the $ETH ecosystem, then using decentralized cross-chain protocols like THORChain to achieve interchain jumps, interspersing privacy tools like Umbra to distract attention, and finally depositing value into Bitcoin, a pool no one can freeze. Every step is stepped on$SNDK 在刚刚突然向上大涨，插爆了很多的空头。 但是，我并不认为这种趋势是可以长期维持的。 也就是说，我是认为它会面临一个回调的。 我认为会回调，有两方面的因素吧。 一方面是现在日元加息，对美股的流动性是造成了很大的影响，另一方面是我对合约数据的分析，在加密中，这种插针往往意味着即将或者已经到了高点。 —————————————————— 我们先讲日元加息。 日元加息其实是美股的一个灰犀牛，这个因素大家都知道，但是一直没有多少人在重视。 长期以来，由于日元和美元之间的利率差，海量的日元被换成美元去美国赚利差。 这就为美国提供了巨额的流动性，也是美股能够维持长牛的重要原因之一。 但是，现在随着日本央行的加息，美元套利规模正在慢慢减小。 这也就意味着，美国的流动性是在缓慢下降的。 这种缓慢下降一般有两个临界点，第一个临界点是刚开始，第二个临界点是利率差缩小到接近无利可图的地步。 目前来看，只要日元再加息一次，目前主流的套利方式将会无利可图。 这个点将是临界点，一旦套利无利可图的时候，市场就不会冒着风险继续去做这种事。 到时候，美国的流动性可能会大幅度收紧，美股可能会迎来一轮新的暴跌。 SEC meeting canceled, the signal is not that the rule is implemented, but that the process is temporarily suspended!
Conclusion first: The SEC public meeting originally scheduled for August 14 to discuss "Regulation Crypto Assets" was canceled. The agenda was only to consider whether to release a rule proposal, not the rule taking effect, and certainly not issuing a new compliance pass to project parties.
Therefore, this news is more like a delay in the regulatory expectation timeline for $BTC, $ETH, $BNB, rather than a reversal of policy direction. CoinDesk reported that the planned Reg Crypto rules and innovation exemption have not advanced. The claim about the impact of the CLARITY Act comes from insiders; the SEC cancellation notice did not explain the reason.
In practice, regulatory news follows this chain: meeting agenda → proposed rules → public comments → final rules → effective implementation. This time it only reached "meeting canceled." The focus going forward is to watch for new meeting dates, formal proposals, comment periods, and final texts on SEC.gov. For project issuance, fundraising, and trading arrangements, do not treat rumored exemptions or bill negotiations as current safe harbors.Bitcoin Magazine's parent company Nakamoto has a Bitcoin-backed loan of 60 million USDT maturing on December 4th. As of June 30th, it holds 4,467 BTC (approximately $261 million), of which 3,805 BTC have been staked with Kraken, leaving only 662 BTC, about $38.7 million, unencumbered; combined with $19.1 million in cash, the total cash plus free BTC amounts to about $57.8 million, slightly less than the principal due. However, the company disclosed that the staked BTC can be sold directly to repay the debt upon maturity, so this is not a simple liquidity gap. Nakamoto also self-assesses that its current liquidity is sufficient to cover cash needs for the next year.
The real highlight is that the on-book BTC holdings and freely deployable reserves are not the same. Those 3,805 BTC are bound by the loan contract and cannot be redeployed at will like the unencumbered BTC—this is exactly why "total holdings" and "unencumbered BTC" need to be distinguished.
In June, the company raised about $48 million by selling approximately 600 BTC and disposing of some derivative positions, of which $45 million was used to repay Kraken, reducing the loan from $210 million to $165 million and extending $105 million to next June. This move effectively eased the near-term maturity pressure—the amount due this December dropped from $105 million to $60 million. The era of vertical expansion on $SNDK is officially behind us. Heavy with a 99%+ decline off top valuations, continuous token unlocks continue to overwhelm secondary market bids before momentum can build.
In stark contrast to $BICO,$BEAT, $ALLO,$KAITO, and $APR—which all absorbed fresh liquidity to execute solid turnaround runs,$SNDK fails to construct a support floor or draw in organic buyers. Without clear accumulation footprints, betting on a turnaround is pure speculation.
$SNDK
#CryptoRevenueVsBTC According to recent data from Woofun‑AI, the Bitcoin market currently hides a leveraged minefield worth as much as $480.1 million. Once key support levels fail to hold, a large number of liquidations will be triggered consecutively. At present, BTC price has been fluctuating around $62,941, appearing calm on the surface, but behind the scenes, bulls and bears are already fiercely battling. Whether the market surges upward or crashes downward, the chain reaction of forced liquidations will amplify market volatility. The entire derivatives market is now at a sensitive tipping point.
From the position structure perspective, there is a clear divergence between bulls and bears on the spot market, with offshore markets and CME's capital flows moving in completely opposite directions.
Offshore, perpetual contracts currently have a positive funding rate. If the price drops, long holders will be under pressure and forced to liquidate, which in turn creates selling pressure that drives the price down.
In contrast, on the CME side, leveraged funds hold a large amount of short positions. This is actually a potential bullish signal: once the price starts to rise, these shorts will rush to buy back to stop losses and close positions, and this short covering will push the price even higher, creating upward momentum.
Another detail is that the decline in open interest and the fluctuating funding rates indicate that the market has been actively deleveraging recently. However, CME's weekly position data is delayed by 4 days and includes complex trades like hedging and basis arbitrage, making it difficult to precisely judge the true intent of each position. Overall, offshore funding rates show many longs are slowly reducing positions to hedge risk; meanwhile, CME data shows shorts quietly accumulating. The two camps currently hold completely opposite risk stances.
Looking at spot ETF capital flows reveals the bigger fundamental picture behind this battle. From August 3 to August 14, ETFs saw a cumulative net inflow of $480.1 million. Although buying momentum has slowed recently, the overall monthly inflow trend has not reversed. Institutional large funds continue to accumulate on dips, providing a solid mid-to-long-term buying foundation, which is crucial for future upward momentum.
The next market move essentially depends on which side—bulls or bears—breaks first under liquidation pressure.
If spot buying lags, ETF buying cools down, and offshore longs keep reducing positions, the price risks moving downward;
Conversely, if spot and ETF buying regain strength and prices rise slightly, the large short positions accumulated on CME will face a stop-loss rush. The buying power from collective short covering could very well trigger a rally. Therefore, the market direction is the result of the combined resonance of price trends, spot market activity, and contract position changes. No single indicator alone can predict the outcome.
In summary, the market is currently in a delicate balance. The $480 million leveraged positions mean that once a break occurs, large-scale liquidations will be triggered. But for now, short-term price fluctuations of 1-2% are not enough to hit the crash threshold. What can truly ignite a big move is a price breakout of key levels followed by spot capital choosing to follow the trend.
Given the current setup, the accumulation of short positions lays the groundwork for a short squeeze rally, combined with the steady mid-to-long-term inflows from ETFs, making an upward breakout more cost-effective. Both bulls and bears face the risk of being liquidated first, and the market is waiting for this balance to be broken.
#BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖 【Product Observation｜BTC Can Be Paid Directly, Recipient Receives USDC】
Breez SDK now supports sending USDC/USDT directly from the user's BTC balance, covering 30+ blockchain networks.
Users do not need to hold stablecoins in advance; the SDK can handle conversion and cross-chain payment paths based on the target address and network.
What’s worth noting here is not just "supporting more than 30 chains."
Rather, the payment process is shifting from being "asset and chain-driven" to "intent-driven."
In the past:
What coins do I have?
Which chain is the other party on?
How do I cross-chain?
In the future, it might become:
I want to pay this address 100 USD.
As for how BTC converts to USDC and on which chain the settlement happens, the wallet completes it in the background.
Breez’s design documentation also clearly emphasizes a unified sending interface, letting users focus on the recipient and amount, not the payment standards.
If this experience becomes mainstream, wallet competition might shift from:
"How many chains are supported"
to:
"How many chains does the user still need to understand?"
This is the change I find more worth paying attention to. 这两天中文圈被一部叫《牛来》的动画刷屏了。 海报是水墨风的文艺感，正片却是穿模卡顿的“4399画质”；主创就两个人——导演和他的妈妈，前身还是装修公司；上映前十天票房只有几千块，结果因为“太抽象了”突然全网爆火。影院加场，票房冲到几百万，同名梗币也跟着在BSC上热闹了一番。 这事儿其实挺有意思。它不是靠“好”火起来的，而是靠“足够离谱、足够能参与"。 海报和正片的巨大反差，让人忍不住截图吐槽；剧情抽象到谁都能玩梗；再加上“牛来”谐音“牛市来”，直接戳中了一部分人的情绪。社交媒体最爱的就是这种高情绪、高互动的内容——吐槽本身变成了传播燃料，大家从观众变成了二创参与者。热度一旦起来，线下打卡和线上讨论又互相喂养，形成了一个完整的闭环。 链上同样快速响应。注意力溢出后，同名代币很快出现，交易活跃，换手很高。但说到底，这是典型的情绪驱动型叙事，波动大、周期短，没有实际用例，风险也很高。去年那些靠名人或政治叙事冲起来的热门梗，最后大多也经历了大幅回撤。热度来得快，退得往往也快。 Wall Street is waiting for the bell to ring: Anthropic valued at 2 trillion, the largest IPO in history, listing in October, breaking SpaceX's 1.77 trillion record that lasted only 3 months. It took 5 years to cover what Apple did in 40 years, is it related to crypto?
Data is explosive: Q2 revenue of $11.5 billion, a 14-fold year-over-year increase, first recorded positive operating profit of $559 million. Annualized revenue went from $1 billion in 18 months to $47 billion. The valuation is even wilder—priced based on a forecasted 2028 revenue of 190-200 billion, valuing it on financials that haven't happened yet.
The growth engine is Claude Code, with an annualized revenue of $14 billion. Enterprise-level LLM spending accounts for 40% (OpenAI 27%), programming segment accounts for 54%. This is not a concept stock; it's real money settled by tokens.
But the 2 trillion valuation relies on an 800% annual growth assumption. SpaceX plunged 38% two months after listing, peaking at IPO.
Double impact on crypto: risk capital will be pulled out around October, tightening liquidity; but if the 2 trillion valuation succeeds, it will reset the anchor for risk assets, benefiting $BTC.
Anthropic is the biggest black swan to watch this year; on the day of its listing, global risk asset pricing logic will shake. Watch liquidity around October. $SPCX #Anthropic #USStocksThe Next Shock Could Hit ETH Differently ⚠️
The early-August carry trade unwind pressured both $BTC and $ETH—but their leverage structures are not the same.
$BTC is heavily driven by futures and institutional positioning, so deleveraging can often happen quickly and relatively orderly.
$ETH has another layer of risk: DeFi leverage, liquidations, and on-chain borrowing.
That means a sharp ETH decline could create a feedback loop:
📉 Price falls
→ ⚠️ Collateral gets stressed
→ 🔥 Liquidations increase
→ 📉 More selling pressure
That’s why I’m not watching the $ETH chart alone.
Keep an eye on TVL, funding rates, open interest, and on-chain activity.
The next major move won’t just be about price.
It will be about where the leverage is hiding. 👀
#BTCVolumeDriesUp #AIInfraEarningsWatch #SPCXOwnershipRevealed #BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖
1. Real-time data
$BTC current price 62900, 24h spot trading volume only 26.6 billion USD, sharply shrunk compared to the 90-day average; US stock BTC spot ETF has had net outflows for several consecutive days, with a single-day total outflow of 885 BTC, Strategy continues to reduce hedging with a small amount of institutional buying, insufficient capital support. The 30-year US Treasury yield fluctuates at a high level, reducing the appeal of non-yielding crypto assets.
2. Core logic
Shrinking trading volume indicates a wait-and-see attitude between bulls and bears, retail and speculative funds exit; whether ETF funds can recover depends mainly on two points: CPI inflation cooling down and US Treasury yields falling. Currently, inflation is sticky, rate cut expectations are delayed, institutions continue to reduce allocation to high-risk assets; combined with continuous corporate treasury sales of $BTC, it is difficult to see sustained large-scale buying in the short term.
3. Personal view
Under low trading activity, the market fluctuates in a narrow range, no heavy positions before ETF funds show signs of stabilization. Patiently wait for weakening inflation data and ETF flows to turn from outflows to inflows before increasing positions; currently, light positions and observation are preferred.
This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment adviceThe core of $SNDK's current trading is not "whether storage prices will rise," but rather a "paradigm shift in the business model." The market is pricing in a revaluation from a "highly volatile cyclical stock" to a "high-certainty growth stock," with the key logic being whether long-term agreements (LTA) can convert short-term abnormal high profits (such as the Q4 peak) into sustainable earnings for fiscal year 2027 and beyond.
Core logic behind the current market pricing
After a significant daily surge by investors, the stock price has partially factored in the following three major expectations:
- From "making money on price increases" to "making money on long-term contracts": The market believes the new LTA can break the curse of "profit when prices rise and losses when prices fall." SanDisk has signed long-term contracts totaling approximately $94 billion with 8 leading customers, covering about 50% of shipments in 2027 and about two-thirds in 2028.
- Sustainability of high profit margins: The market is beginning to believe that the 80% gross margin target is not a flash in the pan. Under extreme stress tests (spot price crashes), if contract coverage reaches 60%-80%, gross margins can still be maintained above 80%.
- Revaluation of the valuation system: No longer undervalued as a cyclical stock, but moving closer to a high-barrier growth stock. Some institutions have raised their FY27/FY28 EPS estimates to $243/$272 (or even higher).
"Verification checklist" for the next earnings report
To determine if there is room for further upward revision, the earnings report needs to focus on verifying the "fulfillment of long-term contracts" and "stability of profit margins":
- Verify the "substance" of the long-term contracts (key)
- Check prepayments and guarantees: Monitor whether "customer prepayments" and "financial guarantees" continue to increase. Currently, there are $2.5 billion in prepayments and over $16 billion in guarantees in place, which are solid evidence locking in future revenue.
- Check fulfillment ratio: Confirm whether the shipment volume covered by long-term contracts reaches the guidance of about 50%, proving the company is indeed switching its business model as planned.
- Verify the "resilience" of profitability
- Observe gross margin trends: If gross margins remain high (e.g., 70%+) and continue to improve quarter-over-quarter, it indicates effective cost control and product mix optimization rather than merely relying on spot price increases.
- Monitor free cash flow: Focus on whether adjusted free cash flow margin is moving toward the 50% target, which is the ultimate proof of high profit authenticity.
- Verify the "incremental" AI demand
- Track HBF progress: Pay attention to sample deliveries and orders for high-bandwidth flash (HBF). Successfully entering the AI inference market would open a new growth curve.
Risk warning: The "Damocles sword" of cyclical reversal
Although long-term contracts provide protection, the stock price is already high, and the following risks could cause severe volatility:
- Capacity shocks: If giants like Samsung and SK Hynix significantly increase production, spot prices may plummet rapidly, eroding profits outside the long-term contracts.
- Risk of long-term contract "failure": Although there are financial guarantees, in an extreme bear market, it remains to be seen whether customers will choose to default (paying penalties) to access lower spot market prices.
The logic behind $SNDK's rise has evolved from "speculating on price increases" to "speculating on certainty." As long as subsequent earnings reports continue to prove that long-term contracts bring real cash flow and profits, and gross margins do not decline, the market revaluation will continue; otherwise, if contract fulfillment falls short of expectations or industry capacity is excessive, the current high valuation will face significant downward pressure. ETF INFLOWS: $500M+
BTC PRICE: $63K 📉
WHO'S SELLING?
I'll tell you who.
Institutions are buying spot BTC with one hand...
And shorting futures with the other.
It's called a "Basis Trade".
They get 8% yield. We get chop.
Money is entering crypto.
But it's not buying price up.
It's buying volatility.
*The Setup:*
📍 $61K = If this breaks, all the hedges get covered. Cascade down.
📍 $65K = If this breaks, all the hedges get blown up. Squeeze up.
$SOL $OKB
#BTC #ETH #Crypto #DailyOrbit$ACU Market Quick Report｜August 17, 2026, 11:00
---
Brothers, the current status of ACU is:
The price is hovering around $0.078–0.082, up about 2%–4% in the last 24 hours. It ranks around #686 in market cap, with a total market size just over 17 million USD—it's one of those small-cap altcoins that nobody really cares about but still manages to move on its own.
Let's review its recent moves:
On August 13, it was still hovering at 0.09, then surged to 0.1425 before dropping back to 0.12. On August 16, it made another move, breaking out with volume from 0.1092 to 0.1267—achieving in two days what others do in a month, and causing many to liquidate positions in a week.
And today, it’s quiet.
It’s like that guy who danced all night at the bar and now is leaning against the wall, drinking water and catching his breath—temporarily calm, but you never know if he’ll rush back to the dance floor the next second.
Current situation:
· Failed twice to break the previous high of 0.14; trapped positions are lining up to get out
· Around 0.12, bulls and bears are stabbing each other
· Nearly 100,000 USD traded in the last 24 hours
Friendly reminder:
This coin’s daily volatility often exceeds 30%, making it a prime candidate in the realm of wild coins. Contract traders are advised to steer clear—spot trading risks losing your principal at most, but contract liquidation can make you experience what it means to "wake up and find your house gone."
---
The above content is for entertainment only and does not constitute any investment advice. Markets are risky, enter cautiously, chasing highs feels good momentarily, but the peak winds are strong. 🌬️The four real reasons behind SanDisk's surge this time
1. Investors have raised long-term targets beyond expectations, reshaping valuation logic
The company provided long-term guidance for 2028-2030: mid-to-high double-digit revenue growth, non-GAAP gross margin maintained around 80%, and an operating profit margin target of 75%. In the past, storage was a typical cyclical stock—good market conditions meant big profits, bad conditions meant losses. Now, management has signed large long-term fixed-price contracts with 8 cloud providers, locking in half of shipments by 2027 and two-thirds by 2028. Even if flash memory prices decline, they can maintain baseline profits. The market is directly re-pricing it from a cyclical stock to an AI growth stock. At the same time, the company promises that after completing business investments, 100% of remaining cash will be returned to shareholders, with a large-scale buyback plan, creating strong expectations for dividends and buybacks.
2. The story of AI inference storage demand has been clearly explained
The current market consensus: the AI training boom is gradually fading, but the inference side is just beginning to explode.
3. Institutions collectively raise target prices, short covering boosts the rally
Multiple investment banks have raised target prices, with some institutions directly setting targets in the 2300-2500 range. Many short positions were accumulated earlier; once the stock price starts to rise, shorts are forced to cover, further amplifying the upward momentum, creating a dual push of "target price increases + short covering."
4. Supportive external macro environment
The US stock market's S&P remains in a high-level consolidation, risk appetite is warming, inflation data has not worsened beyond expectations, interest rate hike expectations have cooled, and growth tech stocks overall have gained positive sentiment, providing a supportive environment for the storage sector.⚡The long-short pattern is quietly shifting! Is ETH gearing up to overtake BTC? But the major market turning point has yet to arrive
#ETF buying reverses, BTC leverage positions rebound
#Consumer momentum weakens, September policies still constrained by inflation
#Spot ETF funds diverge, can ETH relatively outperform BTC⚠️
Based on comprehensive market capital data and the latest assessments from major institutions, Ethereum is entering a phase of relative advantage. But we must soberly recognize the reality: whether BTC or ETH, neither has broken out of the consolidation trap in the short term. Trying to quickly capture short-term profits is basically unrealistic; the current stage is suitable for patient accumulation, far from the time to harvest profits.
📊Three core logics support ETH’s relatively strong stance
• Capital flow shows clear divergence: Reviewing July data, the US Ethereum spot ETF absorbed $347 million, while Bitcoin ETF net inflow was only $172 million. Entering August, ETH ETF funds continued steady inflows, while BTC spot ETF saw a cumulative net outflow of $330 million. The strength contrast is clear, contributing to ETH’s stronger resilience. Many institutions point out that Ethereum does not bear the burden of continuous miner sell pressure, giving its capital structure an inherent advantage.
• ETH/BTC exchange rate continues to recover: In July, ETH/BTC rate rose 10.51%, with a maximum rebound from the bottom of 25%; Bitcoin’s rise was only 8.5% in the same period. Although part of the increase stems from prior deep oversold recovery, it sufficiently proves market capital is gradually shifting toward Ethereum.
• Leading institutions maintain optimistic outlook: Standard Chartered, despite lowering target prices for the coins, remains firmly bullish on Ethereum’s 2026 prospects, predicting it will outperform Bitcoin; Fundstrat also suggests Ethereum’s overall returns will likely surpass BTC by year-end.
⚠️Stay calm! Medium- to long-term downside risks remain
The two major mainstream coins are still trapped in a box consolidation range; do not mistake structural strength for a trend reversal.
• Reviewing historical market patterns, August has traditionally been a weak month for Bitcoin, with median historical returns as low as -7.87%.
• BTC has long been oscillating between 60000–66000, with technical patterns vaguely forming a head and shoulders risk signal; ETH continues to fluctuate between 1850–1950, repeatedly testing upper resistance but failing to break through effectively.
• Multiple investment banks have lowered forward valuations: Citi cut BTC’s 12-month target from 112,000 to 82,000, ETH’s target from 3175 to 2240. Standard Chartered issued risk warnings that BTC may test the 50,000 level, and ETH should be wary of the 1400 point test.
💡Here are several practical trading ideas for everyone
1. Let go of the fantasy of overnight riches and adopt a long-term mindset. Many institutions warn of further correction space; focus on BTC in the 60000–65000 range, ETH closely watching 1800–2000, as corrections may offer better entry opportunities.
2. Conservative players: focus on ETH
Rely on continuous ETF inflows and institutional confidence in relative returns. But there is a hard condition: price must decisively hold above $2000 to confirm the start of a bullish trend.
3. Aggressive players: small positions to play rebounds based on support
Observe spot support strength in BTC 62500–63000 and ETH 1850–1900 ranges; strict stop-loss must be set. If BTC breaks below 60000 effectively, be prepared for deeper adjustments.
4. Conservative traders: patiently hold and wait
Wait for BTC to decisively hold 65000–67000 with volume expanding simultaneously, then confirm the start of a new bullish phase.
#BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖 #消费动能转弱，9月政策仍受通胀制约 $BTC $ETH $OKB #BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖
To put it simply, the biggest problem right now in the crypto space is just one thing: the money hasn't come back, and the ability to make profits is weak.
$BTC's recent trading volume is shrinking, the price isn't moving much, ETF inflows are weak, and stablecoin funds are still flowing out. This means that off-exchange funds aren't in a hurry to buy BTC right now; everyone is waiting.
Looking at ETH, it has clearly attracted more capital attention than BTC recently. In July, ETH spot ETF inflows even outperformed BTC by a large margin. This shows institutions haven't stopped buying crypto; they're just shifting where they invest.
Personally, I pay more attention to this point. A lot of the current money is still in US stocks and Korean stocks, especially in sectors like AI, chips, storage $SNDK, and gold $XAU. These sectors have surged recently, so capital naturally goes where the profit potential is higher.
So BTC now is like a person waiting for customers to come in; the door is open, but the customers have temporarily gone elsewhere to eat.
If BTC ETFs start seeing sustained inflows again, stablecoin funds begin to return, and trading volume expands, then the low volatility of BTC in recent months could very well be a buildup to a big move.
But if funds continue to flow into AI and semiconductors in US and Korean stocks, don't expect the crypto space to take off comprehensively in the short term. Most likely, BTC will move sideways, with ETH and some hot sectors rotating.
In short, the profit potential in crypto right now is not as good as these tech stocks, and smart money will definitely flow to places with higher profit potential.
The above is just my personal opinion and does not constitute any investment advice! $XIAOMI Xiaomi is currently in a "performance wait-and-see" state
Technically, a short-term rebound but the mid-term bearish trend remains unbroken
Mixed news sentiment, tomorrow's interim report is the core catalyst
Tomorrow's interim report: whether the profit decline exceeds expectations, and the guidance for the second half of the year (turning point in phone gross margin, electric vehicle delivery targets)
Xiaomi will announce its Q2 results on August 18 (tomorrow). Current market expectations are clearly divided:
Cautious expectations: CICC forecasts Q2 revenue down 7.6% YoY to ¥107.1 billion, adjusted net profit down 43.55% YoY to ¥6.114 billion; Huatai expects Non-GAAP net profit down 43.2% YoY to ¥6.16 billion, gross margin down 2.1 percentage points QoQ to 19.9%. The main reasons are storage price increases eroding phone profits and continued losses in the automotive business.
Optimistic signals: Morgan Stanley points out Q2 smartphone shipments reached 31.2 million units, 15% above expectations, with average selling price hitting a record high; Shenwan Hongyuan emphasizes the company's full-stack AI advantage is underestimated, with Mimo-V2.5 weekly calls topping the world.
Recent positive developments:
· Buyback support: On August 14, repurchased 1.94 million shares at HKD 25.64-25.72, involving HKD 49.81 million; from June 2 to now, a total of 104 million shares repurchased, accounting for 0.4% of share capital
· New product catalysts: The first wide foldable phone is expected to run Surging OS 4; launching a new mid-to-large model "Pengcheng" in the second half, entering the family segment
· Institutional ratings: Guotai Haitong maintains "Overweight" with a target price of HKD 40.2 (USD 5), indicating a fundamental turning point in the second half; Shenwan Hongyuan maintains "Buy"; Morgan Stanley maintains "Overweight" and target price of HKD 32 (around USD 4)
Before the results are released, the market is likely to remain range-bound. If the interim profit decline meets expectations and optimistic guidance is given, it may trigger a rebound after the negative news is fully priced in; if below expectations, it may test 3.2 or even lower. A prudent recommendation is to reduce holdings or exit
#财报观察员：AI基建财报接力登场 Opening the market software, Bitcoin is still at $63,000
Five weeks ago it was 63,000, and five weeks later, it was 63,000
62,000 is stubborn and unbreakable, 65,500 is absolutely impassable. Volatility has dropped to multi-year lows, and trading volume has shrunk to a fraction of what it was during Trump's inauguration peak and last October's flash crash.
Retail investors are about to go crazy
"Macro data is decent, BTC hasn't dropped sharply, so why can't it rise?"
On August 16, Cumberland released a set of data—
The total market capitalization of stablecoins fell from about $321 billion on May 20 to about $305 billion on August 16
A 5% decline, the third largest drawdown in history
DefiLlama's real-time data is even lower: about $300.76 billion
Meanwhile, Binance has recorded nearly $7 billion in net stablecoin outflows so far in 2026. In July alone, 2.2 billion yuan flowed out, and August is still ongoing
The latest report from 10x Research points out that Bitcoin's trading volume has shrunk significantly, with the price entering its narrowest volatility range in months. Implied volatility has dropped to a rare low for the summer off-season
Without incremental funding, no matter how good the narrative is, it's just castles in the air
The 300 billion outflow of stablecoins is not the end of the world, but because money is seeking yields
What if the money never comes back?
If interest-bearing stablecoins have an annualized rate of 4%, and BTC doesn't rise or fall for a year, why would that money come back?
$BTC $ETH #BTC成交萎缩, can ETF buying rebound? $WLFI A bank license is worth a 15% increase, the Trump concept is really playing this time
WLFI surged more than 13% against the trend this week, currently priced around $0.059, with 24-hour trading volume soaring 435% to $100 million.
1. The core driver is the license. On August 15, the US OCC conditionally approved World Liberty to establish a national trust bank. The issuance and custody of the USD1 stablecoin, valued at $4 billion, will be taken back from BitGo and brought under federal regulation. This is not just empty good news; it is a qualitative change in compliance status.
2. There are more catalysts ahead. Trump is expected to attend a closed-door crypto meeting at the White House on Wednesday. CEOs from Coinbase, Ripple, and others are on the list, maximizing political resources.
3. But be clear: WLFI has been trading sideways between 0.05-0.10 for 11 weeks, with heavy selling pressure concentrated at 0.057-0.058, and there are large leveraged positions on-chain close to liquidation levels.
The license is a long-term logic, not a short-term speculation theme. Only a volume breakout above 0.058 can justify looking at 0.062; otherwise, it remains a range-bound market. Don’t mistake news spikes for trend reversals
#OKX星球话题来啦 100 million in without a rise, 330 million out without a drop — the pricing power has changed hands
The net inflow of US spot BTC and ETH ETFs totals about $1.1 billion, with Bitcoin ETFs accounting for $865 million. According to previous market logic, this should have pushed BTC up by more than 5%. The result? The price remains unmoved, repeatedly fluctuating between $62,000 and $65,000.
Even more bizarre is the reverse test. Bitcoin ETF net outflow is about $329 million. "Common sense" tells us it should crash. Yet BTC's UTC closing price during the same period only dropped about 0.8%.
ETF data has "failed." Why?
First half: ETFs are buying, but the sell pressure from cost-intensive zones on-chain (around $66,000) exactly offsets the buying. The $1.1 billion inflow was entirely absorbed by early holders selling. The price didn't move, but the chips changed hands.
Second half: ETFs are selling, but derivatives are supporting the price. Bitcoin futures open interest surged by $1.2 billion within eight hours, with nominal value rising to about $49.2 billion. The funding rate remains positive — leveraged longs are continuously adding positions.
The current Bitcoin pricing power has shifted from "ETF capital flows" to "derivatives leverage games." Previously: ETF inflow → BTC rises, ETF outflow → BTC falls. Now: ETF inflows are absorbed by unlocking positions, ETF outflows are supported by leverage.
But this "leverage-welded price" is never stable. If ETFs continue to flow out, the accumulated long positions could turn into liquidation fuel at any time. BTC has been acting a bit strange lately. Prices haven't dropped much, but the market has clearly cooled down. K33 data shows that BTC spot trading volume has dropped to relatively low levels in recent years, with the average 30-day trading volume for perpetual contracts only about $10.8 billion. Simply put: those who want to sell aren't selling franziously, and those who want to buy aren't in a rush. Everyone is waiting. But there is one data point I think is even more worth watching than trading volume — ETFs. From August 3 to August 7, US spot BTC ETFs saw a weekly net inflow of about $850 million, with BlackRock's IBIT alone attracting nearly $700 million. This indicates that institutions have not completely abandoned BTC. The problem is, the good news didn't last long. After August 10, ETF funds reappeared and flowed out. So now the most awkward part is here: do institutions want to buy? I thought. Are you just buying continuously? Not yet. This is also why I hesitate to go long right now. Because what BTC really needs is not a fancy story, but real incremental capital. If the following occurs: consecutive ETF inflows + increased spot trading volume + BTC breaks upward, then I will significantly improve my judgment of the market. But if the other way around: ETFs continue to flow out + trading volume is getting smaller + contract open interest remains high, then caution is needed. Because the most troublesome part of this market is: on the surface, things seem calm, but in reality, there's plenty of leverage inside. So next, I'll only look at two things: ETF arrival$BTC $ETH $DOGE 价格在63000附近磨了快两周 成交量肉眼可见在缩 5分钟级别都能出现连续没成交的K线 市场跟被按了暂停键一样 问题不在外部 在内部 美股那边涨得火热 标普都破7800了 币圈资金反而被抽走 存量博弈已经玩不动了 ETF这边确实在买 这周净流入2.4亿 连续两周正流入 但问题是买盘来了价格不涨 说明另一边有人在卖 矿工在卖 MSTR在卖 套牢盘在解套离场 买盘和卖盘互相抵消 价格就被卡死在箱体里 现在的核心矛盾是 外部流动性预期在改善 内部抛压也在消化 但两股力量还没形成合力 需要时间让买盘压倒卖盘 或者出现一个明确的外部催化剂 让资金重新回流 短期还是看63000到64000这个区间能不能放量突破 站上64000 说明买盘占了上风 跌破62500 卖盘还在主导 等量回来 等方向出来 别在缩量里赌方向#BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖 #SPCX持股结构曝光，哈佛13F重仓 #财报观察员：AI基建财报接力登场 # Midday Review 2026.08.17 (Monday)
BTC around $62,950 (-0.4%), ETH around $1,878 (-0.5%), SOL around $75.1, OKB around $104.7. Weekend continued low volume consolidation, weekly drop of 3.5%, Fear & Greed Index at 34.
**Three Key Signals:**
1. BTC ETF net outflow of about $390 million last week (outflow four out of five days), after an inflow of $850 million the previous week, indicating a sharp shift in institutional sentiment.
2. BTC profitable addresses ratio dropped to 51.4%, a three-year low—large amounts of coins stuck in the $65K–$70K range, causing selling pressure on rebounds.
3. Brent crude at $88.5 (+1.7%), geopolitical premium remains; CME shows a 66.9% probability of no rate hike in September.
**My Judgment:** BTC is consolidating narrowly between $62,500–$63,300, with $62,000 as the key support at the lower channel edge; breaking below could see $60,000–$61,000. On the upside, $64,500 is a resistance level that cannot be surpassed without volume. ETF trading resumes today; fund flows will be the catalyst for directional choice—continued outflows suggest bearish bias, net inflows are needed for rebound hopes.
The above is a personal review and does not constitute investment advice, DYOR.
#BTC #ETH #SOL #OKBAMD recently completed the largest US dollar bond issuance in the company's history, raising $4.75 billion in one go.
This issuance is divided into four bonds maturing in 2029, 2031, 2033, and 2036, with interest rates ranging from 4.6% to 5.5%. AMD's official statement only mentioned that the funds will be used for "general corporate purposes," and some may be used to repay existing debt, but no more specific plans have been disclosed.
However, the timing is quite noteworthy.
AMD is not actually short on cash, currently holding about $13.1 billion in cash, while capital expenditures have significantly increased this year, with AI chips, data centers, and supply chains all demanding more funding. Choosing to borrow $4.75 billion at once now seems more like preparing funds ahead as AI investments continue to expand.
Moreover, it's not just AMD raising money recently; the entire AI industry is aggressively seeking capital.
The AI competition has increasingly become a capital war. Anyone wanting to keep up with NVIDIA must not only be able to produce chips but also have deep pockets.
$NVDA $AMD $SNDK
#AMD完成历史最大美元债发行：融资47.5亿美元 $SNDK Seeing this long-short ratio reminds me of the fear of being dominated a month ago... At that time, Micron's long-short ratio was over 90, and in the end, the bulls were completely crushed until their confidence was gone and the long-short ratio returned to around 1. Now everyone is bearish, the long-short ratio once dropped to just over 20, are you still shorting? The financial market only allows a few to make money, that's for sure. The bulls have been consolidating and holding chips for two consecutive weeks, so a few upward spikes are normal. Of course, it's not very suitable to enter a squat position now; it’s probably the final sprint phase. Unless it pulls back below 1700, you can try a small long position. If you want to short, it’s expected after 1850-1900, when the airdrop is basically pulled up, and the long-short ratio is close to 1, then short in batches.$SOL is capturing ETH's RWA growth: $378 million in tokenized US Treasuries added in the past 30 days
Today, SOL has data worth studying separately: in the past 30 days, the scale of tokenized US Treasuries on the Solana chain increased by about $378 million, while Ethereum added about $272 million in the same period. SOL's incremental growth has already surpassed $ETH during this phase.
Combined with Solana's approximately $1.45 billion tokenized stock trading volume in July, SOL's capital logic is no longer just MEME.
The next phase of public chain competition will likely focus more on four metrics:
stablecoin balances, RWA scale, real trading volume, and on-chain fees.
Not just TPS.
In trading, I pay more attention to SOL/$BTC. If BTC continues to consolidate, and SOL/BTC can keep rising while RWA data continues to grow, it indicates that the fundamental narrative is turning into capital preference.
Industry trends can be studied in advance, but prices are best confirmed by the market itself.
#BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖 #标普盈利超预期，华尔街为何仍谨慎？ #Peter Todd Wants to Change the 21M Cap, While Vitalik Is Integrating BTC into ETH
Both chains are simultaneously touching one of their most untouchable parts this week. Peter Todd reintroduced a tail emission proposal on Bitcoin++, aiming to permanently extend block rewards, which would pry open BTC’s 21,000,000 hard cap; meanwhile, Vitalik is suggesting Ethereum scaling can learn from Bitcoin’s UTREEXO, bringing BTC’s light node solution into ETH. These two things seem unrelated but actually answer the same question: should these two most robust networks learn from each other?
Todd’s move is a thought experiment, not an on-chain risk
First, set a baseline for fear. Todd himself made it clear on X: he hasn’t made any substantive contributions to Bitcoin Core in ten years; the label of thought leader fits him better than Core dev. He hasn’t written a single line of core code that would be merged, only reintroduced his July 23 Toronto talk "Tail Emissions and Demurrage" on August 14 on Bitcoin++.
His core argument is actually simple. Permanent BTC issuance does not equal inflation because lost coins would be redistributed to miners through a constant tail reward, resembling gold’s long-term attrition rate; without stable miner income beyond fees, block incentives would collapse, exposing the security budget. Implementing this would require a consensus-level hard fork, rewriting the 21M figure—one of the most untouchable parameters in BTC’s history.
Adam Back outright rejected it on August 16, comparing it to BIP-110, a dangerously inadvisable proposal, criticizing Todd for using simple but incorrect rhetoric to sway people. Dan Held also rebutted: any supply parameter tweak introduces a permanent political attack surface; there’s no way to calculate the most reasonable inflation rate; keeping the 21 million cap is to ensure this topic never surfaces. Todd himself doesn’t bet on it happening; news.bitcoin quotes him saying no tail emission hard fork will happen within five years. This is not a coin risk but a repeatedly stirred narrative.
Vitalik’s side: not changing ETH issuance, but borrowing BTC’s structure
ETH isn’t changing its supply curve but its scaling structure. Vitalik publicly said Ethereum can learn from Bitcoin’s UTREEXO, a scheme that compresses the UTXO set into a Merkle structure, allowing light nodes to avoid verifying the entire history. It doesn’t change ETH’s issuance model but brings BTC’s UTXO-friendly light node structure into ETH, lowering the node entry barrier.
Looking at both side by side makes it clear. Todd wants BTC to learn ETH’s permanent issuance plus miner incentives; Vitalik is making ETH learn BTC’s minimalist state and light nodes. The Bitcoin vs Ethereum debate is shifting from who will replace whom to who learns first.
The market isn’t giving you conclusions, but rhythm
BTC perpetual on 8/17 at 11:50 reported $63,421.3, +0.54% in 24h; funding rate +0.0100% near zero; OKX single-block SWAP oiUsd about $2.12 billion. ETH perpetual at $1,903.91, +1.13% in 24h; funding rate +0.0070% also near zero; oiUsd about $1.34 billion. ETH’s 24h rebound is more than double BTC’s.
Professor Suo noted in the 8/17 morning report: BTC hard fork topic is heating up, some are bottom-fishing, others eyeing 30–50k; ETH lacks buying reasons, everyone talks about shorting ETH together. Narrative and price rhythm are opposite; BTC’s base is dragged into debate by the tail emission narrative, while ETH’s market moves ahead of debate heat.
Whales are betting on both sides. ETH whale 0x8447 withdrew 5,300 ETH worth $9.98 million from Kraken, with multiple withdrawals and staking in the past month (Lookonchain). On BTC’s side, a 7-month dormant address moved 16,400 BTC worth $1.04 billion, and another 100% win-rate bull opened a $107 million BTC long.
Should these two things be considered together?
UTREEXO borrowed is positive for ETH: smaller nodes, lower staking and self-operation thresholds, meaning ETH is adopting BTC’s minimalist node philosophy at a deeper level.
Tail emission is politically almost impossible to pass. It rewrites the 21M cap, the most untouchable number in BTC’s faith. The value of Todd’s proposal is not in implementation but in repeatedly bringing this boundary topic up every two or three years, forcing the community to reaffirm why 21M must not be changed.
The ETH/BTC ratio is watched by many as a reversal node; moonbag and eliz883 have recently called for a reversal. If Vitalik’s borrowing is formalized into an EIP and put on Hegotá’s agenda, ETH’s long-term valuation narrative won’t rely on soaring stories but on BTC-verified structure, making it even harder to collapse.
Let’s discuss three questions in the comments.
Is BTC’s 21M cap an unchangeable faith or just a security lock no one dares to touch?
Is Vitalik borrowing BTC’s UTREEXO philosophy for ETH, or is BTC’s minimalist idea quietly consuming all chains?
$BTC $ETH #UTREEXO 最近的比特币市场出现了一个值得关注的矛盾： 价格没有出现明显崩跌，但成交活跃度正在下降；与此同时，机构资金通过现货ETF曾经出现明显回流，但随后又重新转弱。 这意味着，当前BTC真正需要观察的，可能已经不是“有没有人看多”，而是： 增量资金到底还在不在？ 一、BTC现在最大的问题：市场越来越安静 截至8月17日，BTC在6.3万美元附近震荡。 市场并没有出现典型的恐慌式抛售，反而更像是进入了一个“低成交、低波动、低参与度”的阶段。 K33近期数据显示，BTC永续合约交易活跃度已经明显下降，Binance和Bybit的BTC/USDT永续合约30日平均成交量约为108亿美元，处于近年较低水平。 现货市场同样偏冷。 从市场结构来看，这一点非常重要： 成交量下降，不一定意味着资金疯狂逃跑。 如果是恐慌性抛售，通常会看到成交量快速放大；而现在更明显的特征是： 多空双方都在等待。 也就是说，市场不是没有分歧，而是暂时没有足够强的理由让大资金在当前位置大规模下注。 二、但ETF曾经给过市场一个积极信号 真正值得关注的是美国现货BTC ETF。 8月3日至8月7日，美国现货BTC ETF合计净流入约Regulatory discussion heating up does not mean the policy has been implemented. The homepage shows topics like CLARITY vote pending and SEC rules not yet finalized. The BTC page shows an increase of about 0.46%, ETH remains near 1.88K, with some price recovery, but it’s still unclear if funds are willing to buy long-term on vague expectations. I only recognize three types of confirmation: a clear voting time and official text, BTC holding above 63K, and ETH breaking through 1900 with spot trading volume increasing simultaneously. If there are only rumors and short-term rallies without rule details and sustained buying, I treat it as sentiment trading. Would you wait for the policy text first, or watch for price breakthroughs? $ETH $BTC After $BTC fell below 63,000, what’s really worth watching isn’t the RSI, but whether the chips at 63,000 will turn into selling pressure
BTC is currently around $62,990, down about 2.7% for the week. More importantly, market data shows that around $63,000 is close to BTC’s median realized price, and recent spot buying depth has dropped about 30% compared to early July.
This means 63,000 is not just technical support but also near a large holding cost.
If BTC climbs back above 63,000 and stabilizes, it means these holders are still willing to hold; if it stays below 63,000 for a long time, the original support may gradually turn into selling pressure on rebounds.
In trading, I won’t try to guess the bottom here but will wait for two signals: reclaiming 63,000 + a clear recovery in spot trading volume.
What really needs caution is a price rebound accompanied by continued shrinking volume. That kind of rise is more likely from short covering rather than new money actively entering.
#BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖 #消费动能转弱，9月政策仍受通胀制约 Today $SNDK surged directly because of Investor Day, and those holding positions are probably quite happy. But watching the unrealized gains in my account, I actually started to feel a bit uneasy.
It's not that I am bearish, but for this kind of price increase driven by news, I need to think clearly about what exactly is driving the rise.
In the group chat, everyone is talking about 80% gross margin, 2030 targets, long-term agreements—these sound impressive. But to me, these slogans are meant for those who haven't gotten in yet.
If you already hold a position, what you really need to understand is: at this price, how much good news has already been priced in? At the 1641 level, it's no longer a bet on whether storage chips will continue to be in short supply and increase in price, but a bet on whether it can sustain the abnormally high profits seen in FY2026 Q4 into FY2027 and beyond.
To put it plainly, the market isn't afraid of you making a lot in one quarter; it's afraid that after this wave of profits, there will be nothing left. If the next earnings report shows the gross margin can hold up and the long-term agreement's price-locking power is truly strong, then this valuation still has a story to tell.
But if it's just a short-term bonus from the shortage, once capacity comes online and prices ease, everyone who chased in now will be left holding the bag.
I personally don't plan to add to my position at this level. I'll hold my base position, but I will focus on two things in the next earnings report: one is the sustainability of the gross margin, to see if it's propped up by a one-time price hike; the other is management's guidance for FY2027, whether they dare to give a profit midpoint higher than now. If these two points can't be delivered, then this big rally is an opportunity for me to reduce holdings, not to add.
If you also hold $SNDK, don't just be happy about the stock price rising; think more about how much expectation is already priced in. Making money you understand is more reliable than making money from hype.
$SNDK
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到
#财报观察员：AI基建财报接力登场 The recent days' stock price correction is more due to market sentiment and short-term capital speculation causing fluctuations, rather than a fundamental deterioration.
This week, Falcon 9 completed back-to-back launches from different bases with only a 38-minute interval, setting a new record for its launch efficiency, demonstrating stable execution of mature business; Nvidia disclosed its position entry, representing recognition from leading tech institutions of its long-term path combining terrestrial communication and AI computing power. Starlink's cash flow foundation is solid, Starship is still in the iterative test flight phase, and setbacks in single test flights are normal in the R&D process.
The aerospace sector itself has a very long cycle, and short-term stock price fluctuations are just part of the journey. The main storyline of Starlink's continuous expansion, Starship unlocking large transport capacity, and the establishment of a space computing ecosystem remains unchanged. After experiencing losses and fluctuations, I still have a long-term optimistic view of SpaceX and am willing to patiently wait for the gradual realization of its technological and commercial value. $BTC $SNDK $SPCX 📊 当前市场呈现明显的结构分化。美股存储板块如SanDisk等存储类个股，在整体市场震荡背景下走出独立的强势行情，多头情绪炽热，但这一热度并非盲目炒作，而是有清晰的产业逻辑支撑。与此同时，加密市场却显得相对沉寂，现货ETF出现小幅净流出，资金观望情绪浓厚，缺乏内生上涨动力。两类资产在同一宏观环境下表现迥异，值得深入拆解背后的原因。 🔍 存储板块的独立行情首先来自产业基本面的实质性改变。随着AI推理需求爆发，大模型对海量数据的实时调用和缓存需求急剧上升，直接拉动了对NAND闪存和内存芯片的需求。原厂合约价连续上调，而长期订单锁定了未来产能，使得存储行业的周期性明显弱化，从过去的强周期股逐步转向成长属性更重的赛道。更关键的是，相关公司开始向股东支付现金股息，这会吸引追求稳定回报的机构资金集中流入，形成正向循环。可以说，这一轮上涨是盈利预期和资金偏好共振的结果，而不仅仅是短线情绪驱动。 ⚠️ 但风险同样不容忽视。短期涨幅过大意味着估值快速抬升，一旦市场对AI需求增速的预期出现任何松动，随时可能引发集中获利了结。更宏观的压力来自美债收益率长期维持高位。高利率环境下，成长股估值普遍承压，存储Brothers, I am Long Paopao.
Last time we talked about Robinhood Chain, today I must single out Pons — currently the most powerful launchpad on this chain and one of the targets with the most intense KOL hype recently.
1. What is Pons?
Pons is a token launch platform (Launchpad) built on Robinhood Chain, similar in function to Pump.fun on Solana.
After the Robinhood Chain mainnet went live on July 1, Noxa (the previous leading launchpad) unexpectedly shut down, turning the Robinhood launchpad scene into a "battle of many factions." Pons quickly rose to the top within a week, becoming the current leader.
2. Who is hyping it? How?
This "Pons fever" is not a solo fight:
1. Bonk gang openly entering
Bonk ecosystem core figure bonkguy openly bought $PONS and even added more later. This sparked a "conspiracy theory" narrative — that Bonk gang might be manipulating Pons behind the scenes.
2. WLFI advisors continuously hyping
Advisors from the Trump family project WLFI, like @cryptogle, have been publicly hyping $PONS, further strengthening the market’s imagination of a "big force" behind Pons.
3. Robinhood CEO personally involved
On July 21, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev followed Pons founder @MEADGod on X. Vlad then tweeted clear support for RWA and Meme coins. The founder being directly followed by Robinhood’s top leader — this kind of signal is priceless in the attention economy.
4. KOLs collectively bullish
On July 27, according to BlockFlow KOL opinion aggregation platform, $PONS received unanimous bullish views within 24 hours.
3. What is the logic behind the hype?
Summarizing the core arguments from KOLs:
1. Traffic monopoly
Pons controls about 80% of Robinhood launchpad traffic. Its daily trading volume market share once reached 52.1%. Cumulative trading volume exceeds $1 billion, with over 290,000 tokens issued.
2. Strong buyback and burn mechanism
Pons uses 80% of protocol revenue to buy back PONS. Within one month of launch, it has burned over $9 million worth of PONS, nearly 30% of total token supply. Some KOLs estimate an average daily burn of about 2.88 million tokens over 7 days.
3. Explosive revenue data
The platform’s daily revenue is about $186,000, which annualizes to $48.5 million at this rate. Token creators have cumulatively received over $15.3 million in fees. A KOL pointed out that Pons’ market cap/revenue ratio is only 0.76x, far below the DeFi industry median of 31.9x, and even lower than Pump.fun’s 2.92x — meaning its relative valuation is still very cheap.
4. Deflation + V2 upgrade
Within one month of launch, cumulative trading volume has approached $2.5 billion. The V2 version starts charging fees from the first trade, covering the entire token lifecycle. The team is also planning new directions like NFT+RWA pairing.
4. What does Paopao think?
Pons’ fundamentals are indeed strong — revenue, burn, and market share are all improving. But the more intense the hype, the more you need to stay clear-headed:
How much good news is already priced in?
Pons’ market cap once exceeded $39 million in July, then fell back to around $27 million. On August 8, it surged 65% in 24 hours. These waves of price pumps are largely driven by KOL hype and attention.
Uncertainty in the launchpad sector
Although Pons is the current leader, competitors like Arrow are eyeing the spot. The launchpad sector is winner-takes-all, but who will ultimately win is still uncertain.
Token-specific risks
Pons is the platform’s own token, not a third-party Meme coin running on the platform. The value of a platform token depends on the platform’s ability to continuously generate revenue — if users flow to competitors, all valuation logic must be recalculated.
Summary
Pons is currently the strongest data, most hyped, and most aggressively narrated target in the Robinhood Chain ecosystem. The triple endorsement from Bonk gang + WLFI advisors + Robinhood CEO’s attention has made it the center of attention in this launchpad battle.
But remember: the fiercer the hype, the stronger the FOMO, the greater the volatility.
I am Long Paopao, thanks brothers for the support. DYOR, control your position size, and let’s chat in the comments.Brothers, I am Long Paopao.
Continuing from last time, today I want to talk specifically about Robinhood Chain. This might be the most underestimated "on-chain variable" in the current market. Don't treat it as just another ordinary new L2; this is an experiment where 27.6 million traditional retail investors are being onboarded to the chain in bulk for the first time.
1. What is Robinhood Chain?
It has been live for just over a month, and the data is quite explosive:
· TVL rose from $269 million to $377 million (+40.3%)
· Stablecoin market cap increased from $433 million to $539 million (+24.4%)
· Active RWA market cap grew from $54.5 million to $89.1 million (+63.5%)
· Daily active addresses surged from 280,000 to 5.2 million at one point
· Over $200 million ETH cross-chain transfers in, with about 130 million total transactions
More notably—spot DEX trading volume dropped nearly 20%, but TVL, stablecoins, RWA, and Perp trading volumes are all growing. This indicates that capital is shifting from short-term speculation to products with long-term lifecycles such as lending, yield, perpetual contracts, and tokenized assets.
2. What opportunities in the ecosystem are worth watching?
1. Robinhood Earn—Earn 7% APY passively
Robinhood Earn is directly integrated into the main app. Compliant users only need to hold USDG stablecoins in a self-custody wallet, and through Morpho-powered vaults, they can earn about 7% annualized yield with no lock-up period.
Key point: Millions of Robinhood users can now access on-chain yields directly through a familiar interface without cross-chain transfers, searching for protocols, or learning DeFi operations. Morpho's TVL on Robinhood Chain has reached $274 million, accounting for over 70% of the chain's total DeFi TVL.
Morpho itself manages over $11 billion in assets and recently completed a $175 million funding round led by Paradigm and a16z Crypto—this sector has strong institutional backing.
2. Arcus—Built jointly by dYdX Labs and Robinhood
A DEX constructed by dYdX Labs and Robinhood Crypto, focusing on spot and perpetual contract trading of stock tokens and cryptocurrencies. Currently supports 95 stock tokens trading 24/7, with a TVL of about $18.6 million and a 7-day spot trading volume week-over-week growth exceeding 100%.
Highlight: In the future, Arcus tokens will be preferentially allocated to dYdX community members—users who trade, stake, or validate on dYdX may receive airdrops.
3. Lighter—$11 million incentives being distributed
A ZK-powered decentralized perpetual and spot exchange. Lighter has committed $11 million worth of LIT token incentives to the Robinhood community. Trading through the Robinhood wallet earns double points, which can be directly exchanged for LIT.
More importantly—Lighter's perpetual contracts are directly integrated into the Robinhood wallet, allowing users to trade without transferring assets. Perp trading volume increased 62.7% week-over-week in the past week.
4. Rialto—Entry point for stock token trading
An on-chain spot exchange supporting crypto assets, stocks, ETFs, etc., initially launching with over 90 Robinhood stock tokens. It uses a propAMM model—this is the most direct trading venue for Robinhood stock tokens.
5. Tokenized stocks—ERC-20 standard, composable
Robinhood's stock tokens follow the ERC-20 standard. This means they can:
· Be self-custodied by users
· Be transferred between wallets
· Be integrated into AMMs, lending markets, and derivatives
Currently, Robinhood Chain has about 328,000 tokenized asset holders, making it one of the chains with the largest holder base in the tokenized stock market.
6. HOOD stock itself—Institutions collectively bullish
Don't forget Robinhood's stock (HOOD). Barclays target price $122 (up 49%), Bernstein target price $160, Goldman Sachs maintains "Buy". Bernstein explicitly points out blockchain expansion as the core reason for the upgrade.
3. Participation strategies
1. If you have a Robinhood account: directly experience Robinhood Earn in the app; 7% no-lock yield is currently the most straightforward on-chain entry.
2. If you are a dYdX veteran user: keep an eye on Arcus token allocation rules, airdrops may be available.
3. If you want to earn incentives: trade perpetual contracts on Lighter via the Robinhood wallet to earn double points redeemable for LIT.
4. If you are optimistic about the long-term track: pay attention to the overall growth of RWA and tokenized stocks—active RWA market cap rose from $12-13 million to nearly $89.1 million within weeks, a growth rate worth considering.
4. Risk warnings
· Robinhood Chain has been live for just over a month; the ecosystem is still in its early stages
· Early activity is mainly driven by speculative trading of Meme coin Cash Cat
Summary: Robinhood Chain is not just another "technically superior" L2; it is a traffic engine with 27.6 million real users. There are many short-term speculative opportunities (incentives, airdrops), but the real value lies in what happens when these tens of millions of traditional users start to get used to on-chain finance.
I am Long Paopao, thanks brothers for the support. DYOR, manage your positions, let's discuss in the comments.$1.1 billion inflow, but prices don’t rise—ETFs are "blunting" the market
Last week, Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs saw a combined net inflow of $1.1 billion, ending the net outflow trend that lasted most of 2026. BlackRock's IBIT alone accounted for about 80% of the total Bitcoin ETF inflow.
But what about the price? Bitcoin briefly touched $65,000 before retreating to the $62,500–$63,000 range. "There is capital, but no trend" has become the most accurate summary.
There are three reasons. First, although ETF purchases provide incremental demand, miners, early holders, and corporate holders are also reducing their positions during the rebound—buy and sell orders expand simultaneously, effectively locking the price. Second, ETF funds are highly concentrated in Bitcoin, with very weak spillover effects on altcoins. Third, ETF inflows show significant daily fluctuations—only a stable net inflow sustained over several weeks, rather than concentrated buying over a few days, can form a true trend demand.
More worrisome is that ETF trading volume has dropped to the second-lowest level since October 2024. Funds have come in, but no one is willing to trade at this price level. Bitcoin’s market dominance has risen to 56.5%, stablecoins account for 13.4%—funds would rather sit in stablecoins earning interest than spread out. ETFs are no longer "rocket fuel" but a "shock absorber"—they can support the bottom but cannot drive the trend.