Orbit Post Sitemap
Official addresses of $TRUMP coin continue to reduce holdings. Is this the final wrap-up of a pump-and-dump scheme? Have they already sold off all their holdings?
Information:
1. TRUMP token has a clear unlocking schedule
About 80% of the tokens were initially allocated to entities related to Trump and are gradually unlocked over several years. Recently, a large number of tokens continue to be released, with hundreds of millions more to be unlocked in the future.
2. Unlocking = natural selling pressure
Currently, over 70% of the supply has been unlocked, but about 28% remains to be released. The next unlocking round will release close to 3% of the total supply.
3. The price has dropped significantly from its historical high
TRUMP's historical high exceeded $70, now it is only around $2. Usually, the real "final wave of a pump-and-dump" happens near historical highs or during frenzied rallies, not after most of the gains have already been lost.
Currently, it is necessary to observe and understand:
If the following three events happen simultaneously: official wallets continuously transfer coins - transferring into exchanges like Binance, OKX, Bybit - and the price is instead pushed up,
then be cautious: using political events or market sentiment to pump the price, then selling off during liquidity, this is close to the common "final stage of a pump-and-dump" in the crypto world.
#TRUMP关联地址减持，抛压会否延续？ #US expands sanctions on Iran, Strait navigation talks advance
If the Strait of Hormuz really reopens, BTC might actually face an interesting situation.
The market looks very chaotic right now:
The US continues to expand sanctions on Iran, but on the other hand, US-Iran talks are progressing, and there is even discussion about a temporary joint navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.
So the real variable is not "whether to fight or not," but whether oil supply will actually be cut off.
If talks advance and shipping through the strait resumes, the war premium on crude oil might continue to retreat.
Once oil prices fall, the market's first thought won't be war, but whether inflationary pressure will ease.
If energy prices drop and inflation pressure eases, the Federal Reserve's policy space might actually expand.
Then it will transmit through: oil prices → inflation expectations → US Treasury yields → rate cut expectations → liquidity improvement → BTC benefits
So this matter is actually quite interesting for BTC.
What BTC is truly sensitive to is often not "whether the world is chaotic."
But rather where global liquidity is flowing.
Going forward, two things can be watched: crude oil prices + US Treasury yields.
War news is just the first layer.
Liquidity is the second layer.
And the second layer is often what truly determines the price of $BTC $CL Strategy's $5B Question Strategy isn't simply about buying $BTC anymore. Its latest moves have pushed its USD reserve to roughly $5.1B, creating a much larger liquidity buffer. That changes the conversation. More cash means less forced-selling risk and more flexibility around $BTC purchases, debt and preferred securities. The big question now: Does that cash eventually become fresh $BTC demand? If it does, Strategy could remain one of the market's biggest structural buyers. $BTC $MSTR#BTC80KHoldBTC surging and then retreating—is it really "unable to rise"? Or are we just too easily fooled by prices? Many people see BTC being rejected above 80,000 and pushing back to around 78.8K, while ETH shrinks to 2.45K. Their first reaction is "It's over, it's going to turn bearish." But if you only look at the candlesticks, you really miss out on something more important. Let's set aside fear first and take a look at the real state of the capital market. In the past five trading days, BTC spot ETFs have seen a net inflow of nearly $2 billion, and ETH ETFs have not turned negative. This is not a signal of "retreat"; it's more like someone is taking profits at a high level while bigger money is quietly buying on the other. Prices are falling, but the support is stronger than expected. This misalignment often means: the market is repricing, not fleeing. I've been monitoring the market these past two days, focusing not on bulls and falls, but on three linkage signals: - Whether BTC ETF inflows and spot volume can expand simultaneously, which determines whether a pullback leads to a shakeout or distribution. - Whether the ETH/BTC exchange rate has stabilized, and whether ETH ETF inflows can continue—this is crucial for the momentum of the altcoin season. - Whether SOL's trading volume and momentum keep pace are a thermometer of risk appetite this round, not just a simple "third largest coin." If the support level holds, I think sectors like AI and RWA still have room for further activity. Because essentially, they're trading the expectation of "risk appetite rebound," not trading BTC's absolute priceAnthropic talks about the market size in astronomical numbers, but what investors should really be wary of is not the size of the numbers—it’s that it makes them forget to ask a simple question: how exactly does this company make money? AI companies are now best at saying "how many jobs can be replaced, how many industries covered, how much software budget can be eaten up," each sounding like a gold mine. But revenue potential is not profit, and user growth is not cash flow.
The IPO narrative creates a kind of anxiety: if you don’t buy now, you’ll miss the next generation platform. But once it actually goes public, the market will immediately change its face and start asking about gross margin, computing costs, customer retention, and competitive price cuts.
Even good companies fear being too expensive. Especially in AI, an industry where the burn rate is faster than the spread of the story.
#Anthropic估算30万亿美元市场，IPO叙事能否兑现？ After carefully reviewing FIP-101, it basically means: rewarding those who run the index, and allowing $FB holders to stake to nodes and share some rewards.
Although Bitcoin has transaction records on-chain, the wallet balances, holding addresses, and market data don't generate themselves; behind the scenes, indexers have to organize every single record.
Previously, each party maintained their own index, which cost money and sometimes resulted in different outcomes for the same data.
FIP-101 makes this a standalone service. Some run nodes to organize data and submit proofs, $FB stakers support the nodes, and rewards are shared together.
I think this idea is good; at least $FB gains a practical use beyond just transfers and price speculation.
However, currently it's still just UniSat running a single index node test, staking has limits, and multiple nodes haven't officially launched, so calling it "decentralized index mining" is a bit premature.
It depends on whether third parties are willing to run nodes, if data from multiple nodes can be reconciled, and whether wallets and exchanges actually use it.
If in the end only UniSat runs it, then it's just a staking layer on top of their own indexing service.
If multiple nodes can really run, verify each other's data, and continuously share rewards, then this could be interesting.
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 Oil prices have fallen, which actually looks more like the market betting that the "channel can be reopened".
The US expanding sanctions on Iran should theoretically be bullish for oil prices, but after the Strait navigation talks advanced, traders sold oil first. The reason is very practical: sanctions are a slow variable, while shipping channels are a fast variable. As long as the market sees progress in temporary corridors, mine clearance, and escort arrangements, short-term supply panic will cool down first.
But I am reluctant to interpret this as a risk being lifted. The most annoying thing about the energy market is that it often pushes risk prices down first, then waits for some detail to fail in negotiations and pulls them back up again.
This is not a peaceful transaction, it’s more like a "traffic jam moving slightly." Whether the traffic flow can really resume depends on execution, not statements.
#美扩大对伊制裁，海峡复航谈判推进 #Anthropic估算30万亿美元市场，IPO叙事能否兑现？
Anthropic's IPO narrative is one of the grandest capital stories in business history—$30 trillion TAM, $2 trillion valuation, $100 billion fundraising, with each figure setting new records. Supporting this narrative is the real "rocket-like" revenue growth and the milestone of first profitability.
However, TAM is ultimately a theoretical upper limit, not actual achievable revenue. The $30 trillion figure is more a storytelling tool than a financial forecast. The real test lies in whether Anthropic can maintain growth amid sustained high investment and, under real constraints such as open-source model competition and compute expansion bottlenecks, convert this grand narrative into sustainable profitability.
After the official prospectus disclosure in September, market pricing will provide the first round of answers. #BTC breaks through $80,000, bullish sentiment returns, can it hold the new ground?
I am Brother Ci, BTC has broken through the key resistance at $80,000, and this rebound has officially entered a new phase.
On-chain data shows that in the past week, whale addresses have increased their holdings by over 50,000 BTC, and the number of addresses with balances exceeding 1,000 BTC has reached a nearly two-month high. Meanwhile, stablecoin supply continues to expand, with USDT and USDC total market cap growing by about $1.8 billion in a single week, signaling clear inflows of off-exchange funds. However, at the same time, the cost basis line for short-term holders (within 155 days) has risen to around 76,000, and the current price range chips have substantial floating profits, with profit-taking and chasing forces fiercely competing.
On the macro front this week, the PCE inflation data combined with the Jackson Hole Symposium means there is still uncertainty in the market’s pricing of September rate cut expectations. If the core PCE month-over-month is below 0.2%, it may strengthen the soft landing narrative, further suppress real dollar interest rates, and support risk assets. Conversely, if inflation stickiness exceeds expectations, short-term selling pressure may intensify.
After the price stands above 80,000, the real test is not a one-time breakthrough but whether spot buying strength can support turnover. On-chain exchange inflows surged 12% yesterday, indicating short-term selling pressure is accumulating; however, Coinbase premium has turned positive, showing that US capital buying is still entering. The direction remains a bullish trend, and the rhythm requires attention to whether the 78,000-80,000 range can form a new chip concentration zone as a support base. #Anthropic估算30万亿美元市场，IPO叙事能否兑现？
Anthropic is sprinting toward one of the heaviest IPOs in history, pitching investors a $30 trillion TAM total addressable market, already surpassing SpaceX's $28.5 trillion narrative. But it’s important to distinguish that this is a theoretical upper limit, not a short-term revenue target. Whether the story can materialize is highly debated in the market.
What exactly is the $30 trillion narrative?
This figure is based on the total economic value of all cognitive labor that AI can replace, not the company’s actual future revenue.
The company’s internal pragmatic goal: revenue of only $190-200 billion by 2028, which is orders of magnitude smaller than $30 trillion.
The IPO target valuation is $2 trillion, aiming to raise up to $100 billion to invest in computing power and data center infrastructure, with formal filings expected in September-October.
Bullish logic: the narrative has a real foundation
1. Revenue growth is indeed explosive, with enterprise demand for the Claude series surging, significantly boosting annualized revenue in the short term, and already achieving adjusted profitability.
2. The global enterprise digital transformation space is huge; products like Agents and code assistants open new growth, and the long-term logic of large models replacing cognitive labor holds.
3. If the IPO subscription is hot, it will raise global tech risk appetite, boosting sentiment for AI compute chains and risk assets, indirectly benefiting BTC.$BTC & $ETH :IS HISTORY ECHOING AGAIN?
In 2022, $BTC fell sharply in June, rallied through summer, then made a final move toward $16K before the cycle bottomed. $ETH followed a similar path.
In 2026, $BTC has surged back above $80K, while $ETH has recovered toward $2.5K. The key difference is institutional demand: spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded nearly $2B in weekly inflows, while ETF activity has also strengthened around.#BTC80KHoldOrFold #Anthropic30TTAM #IranSanctionsAndTalks 📰 What happened?
On August 25, Bitcoin briefly surpassed $81,000, reaching a nearly three-month high. Reuters pointed out that this rally was driven by factors such as a weakening US dollar, increased long-term US Treasury buybacks by the US Treasury Department, and investors returning to crypto assets. 📌 Why is this important?
This is not just a simple crypto market rebound. Last week, the US spot BTC ETF saw a net inflow of about $1.9 billion, while the ETH ETF had a net inflow of about $697 million, both marking the best weekly performance since 2026. 🧠 My view:
The market is trading a bigger narrative: improved liquidity + concerns over dollar depreciation + institutional capital returning. More than the short-term gains, it’s worth watching whether these funds can sustain. 👀 What to watch next?
Whether the $80,000–$82,000 range can turn from resistance into support, and whether ETF funds continue to maintain net inflows. 💬 Do you think this BTC rally is more of a "liquidity-driven market," or the start of a new trend? #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto $BTC $ETH $SOL #BTC80KHoldOrFold #IranSanctionsAndTalks #StrategyBuildsCash $BTC has broken through 80000 again. This round of rally is accompanied by short covering and spot buying inflows. Last week, ETF net inflows reached $1.92 billion, the largest single-week inflow in nearly 10 months. After the price entered a high level, the proportion of short-term holders in profit increased, and profit-taking pressure also rose. This week, PCE inflation, Jackson Hole speech, and employment benchmark revisions are key points. Breaking through 80000 is only. #BTC80KHoldOrFold Will Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to follow the "four-year cycle"? This time, it might really be different.
Bitcoin's four-year halving cycle used to be like a market script: halving → rally → new high → crash → bottom → repeat.
But now, a key change is happening: BTC's cycle is gradually decoupling from the overall crypto market cycle.
In the past two bull runs, the 2017 ICO boom and the 2021 DeFi and NFT waves coincided with BTC's halving cycle. But this round is clearly different—BTC has already surpassed its previous high, while ETH is still some distance from its all-time high of about $4,800.
The reason might be simple: this time, there hasn't been a truly game-changing innovation for the entire industry.
BTC's core logic remains scarcity, and halving is still important, but its marginal impact is weakening; what ETH really needs is the next DeFi-level application explosion.
The 2026 "Glamsterdam" upgrade can provide a technical catalyst, but what will truly determine whether ETH can reignite the market might not be the upgrade itself, but:
When will the next DeFi or NFT-level innovation emerge?
So, the future might look like this:
BTC follows the halving rhythm, ETH follows ecosystem breakthroughs.
$BTC $ETH
#DailyOrbit $CL is currently neither in a "trend-following long" position nor a "mindless short" position—it's a game at the lower boundary of the range after premium retracement.
The bullish logic only applies if: 80–81 holds steady + geopolitical news reignites, targeting 84–86 for reducing positions.
The bearish logic only applies if: a rebound stalls at 85–87 with continued inventory accumulation, or a valid break below 80 to short towards 78/75.
The biggest risk: geopolitical news causing a gap down overnight, making technical stop losses easy to breach; leveraged CL products in overseas markets must control position sizes.
In short: the most likely scenario for CL in the near term is to wash out part of the geopolitical premium between 80–87 USD before choosing a direction; fundamentals are bearish, geopolitics bullish, 80 is the bulls' defense line, 87 is the bears' defense line, whoever breaks first determines the short-term trend."The Treasury plans to use 950 billion TGA to repurchase long-term bonds: real cash injection or robbing Peter to pay Paul?"
Wall Street is still focused on newly issued short-term debt, while the U.S. Treasury directly signals plans to use the massive $950 billion cash sitting in the TGA account. Starting from September 9, the single repurchase floor for inactive long-term U.S. Treasuries from 10 to 30 years will be doubled from $2 billion to over $4 billion.
After this sedimented fund held at the Federal Reserve enters the market to buy, it will instantly convert into high-powered reserves for commercial banks. This is equivalent to the Treasury bypassing the Fed's rate cut rhythm to directly inject liquidity into the market, forcibly unblocking the balance sheets of primary dealers choked by old bonds.
However, the nearly $2 trillion annual U.S. fiscal deficit remains unchanged. Using future cash buffers today to buy the bond market some breathing room means that by the debt ceiling deadline next spring, large-scale new debt issuance will still be necessary to withdraw liquidity again. $BTC $CORE CORE rebounds to $0.0256, driven by revenue narrative
CORE is currently at $0.0256, up 4% intraday, continuing a low-level rebound.
Driving logic: The roadmap enters the "revenue era" — the entire ecosystem's fees are uniformly used to buy back CORE, ending inflation subsidies. The public beta of SatPay in July is a key observation window.
Institutional foundation is ready: Custodians like BitGo have been integrated, and compliant BTC staking channels are open.
Key points to watch: actual SatPay data + on-chain BTC staking volume will determine if the rebound can sustain. July will be the test; avoid chasing highs in the short term. Suddenly thought of a question—if $BTC really hits 100,000 dollars in these two months, how far can altcoins follow?
I’ve been speculating a bit myself:
$CFX is just over 0.04 dollars now, far from its 1.7 ATH. But after all, it’s an L1, and the domestic chain still holds a strong card. If BTC can really hold at 100,000 and funds start rotating into the L1 sector, I think 0.12 to 0.18 is reachable, and pushing up to 0.25 with some sentiment-driven momentum isn’t out of the question.
$CORE is one of my favorite picks. If BTC breaks 100,000 and the market starts hyping the BTC ecosystem and staking line, doubling from the current position to 2–3 dollars seems possible. But this coin has poor liquidity, so the candlestick will definitely have a long upper shadow then, and if it really reaches that price, you probably won’t hold it steadily.
Previous view: BTC rallies first → ETH follows → L1 takes over → small infrastructure catches up. This is the usual script for every market cycle. But the biggest trap for newbies is mistaking beta for certainty. If the break of 100,000 is a low-volume false breakout, these three might not even achieve half the gains. So I plan to hold and wait for a pullback before making a move; I won’t chase highs.
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口
#美扩大对伊制裁，海峡复航谈判推进
#Anthropic估算30万亿美元市场，IPO叙事能否兑现？ Bitcoin hovers around $79,610, just one step away from the $80,000 mark, with the overall market capitalization at $2.71 trillion. Ethereum has strengthened in tandem, rebounding above $2,500. The most subtle aspect of this position is that a large amount of short liquidation pressure has accumulated near $80,000 above; if it breaks through, it could trigger a series of short coverings, creating upward momentum; while the lower range between 75,000 and 79,000 is a dense zone of long leverage; if key support is breached, high-leverage positions may face the risk of rapid liquidation. The tug-of-war between bulls and bears is concentrated in this narrow channel. It is worth noting that the US stock market is not cooperating. The Nasdaq index fell 0.76%, with the AI hardware sector especially under pressure. Nvidia fell for the seventh consecutive trading day, falling nearly 3%, marking the longest losing streak since 2022. The storage and optical communications industry chain was generally weak, with Micron down nearly 6%, and SanDisk and Seagate both down more than 6%. Funds clearly shifted from overvalued AI hardware to defensive sectors, and market risk appetite is shrinking. However, cryptocurrencies have emerged independently, further weakening their correlation with US stocks. This divergence itself indicates that digital assets are being seen as a separate allocation direction by some capital. On the macro level, the market is awaiting statements at the Jackson Hole meeting. The August 28 remarks were highly anticipated, with investors hoping to find a path that connects economic data and policyThe long position taken at 1207 has now gained 156 points in floating profit, with 50x leverage. SKHYNIX is holding steady around 1245.
The logic behind this trade is simple: buying in the 1162-1138 range, with targets to take profits in batches between 1173-1295. There's not much to say about the fundamentals—HBM3E is the exclusive supplier to NVIDIA. In the first quarter report, NVIDIA contributed $5.188 billion in revenue, a year-over-year increase of 62.6%. Now there's also a mysterious major client accounting for 12.4% of revenue.
The only issue is today's news: the union rejected the temporary wage agreement, with the vote difference between approval and rejection only 25 votes. The core disagreement is that the performance bonus was changed to 60% stock + 40% cash, which the employees are not accepting. There will be short-term emotional disturbances, but SK Hynix has a precedent—after rejection and renegotiation, the price still rose.
Technically, there was a rebound just last Friday, and the market temperature is fine. Hold for now and watch how the sentiment digests the news.
"Hotspot Watch"$BTC surged then pulled back, so why did crypto stocks rise by 5% instead? On August 25, the US Cryptocurrency and Crypto-Related Stocks Index rose 5.04%, closing at 72.20 points. Interestingly, on the same day, BTC peaked near $81,200, then retreated to around $79,000. While the coin price started to fluctuate, the stock side kept pushing higher. Over the past 5 trading days, Strategy has gained about 33%, and Coinbase about 23%. This indicates that Wall Street is now trading not just "how much BTC rises today," but is also pricing in the entire crypto industry's profits and valuation recovery in advance. There are three main reasons: BTC's explosive rally last week re-attracted ETF funds; US long-term Treasury repos pushed yields and the dollar lower; regulatory expectations like the CLARITY Act reopened valuation space for Coinbase, trading platforms, and crypto infrastructure companies. But there is also a risk here. Crypto stocks are essentially a high-beta version of Crypto. They may surge more than BTC when rising, but once BTC falls below key levels again, the stock side usually amplifies the drawdown. So the current 5% rise in crypto stocks can be understood as Wall Street's risk appetite returning to Crypto, but it cannot yet be directly equated with "a new bull market being confirmed." What is more worth watching next is whether crypto stocks can continue to strengthen independently while BTC fluctuates around $80,000. If they can, it means this round of funds is starting to spread from "buying coins" to the entire crypto industry #US expands sanctions on Iran, Strait navigation talks advance On one hand, sanctions are intensified; on the other, Strait navigation talks have begun. The situation is tense but leaves room for easing, with no move toward a full blockade for now. Brent crude is currently priced at $88.58. After the news, risk premiums have fallen, causing a slight dip in oil prices. Briefly on the impact on my "three melons and two jujubes" holdings: Talks advancing = risk-off sentiment cooling down, short-$SOL brothers, SOL has fallen back from 100 and is now around 97, down 0.55% in 24h.
Yesterday when it broke through 100, I said: 69% of liquidations came from shorts, it was a short squeeze pushing it up, largely a leverage feast. Today it was confirmed, 85% of the $16.9 million liquidations in 24 hours were longs, those chasing the rally got washed out.
There is also bad news: none of the three Solana governance proposals reached the 33% participation threshold to pass. The two positives, accelerating inflation deflation and transaction fee burn, did not pass, so the deflation narrative is temporarily off. This is also one reason for the pullback from 100.
But the fundamentals are not bad: ETFs are still inflowing ($33.49 million on August 24), the network's weekly transaction volume hit a record 1.31 billion, the RWA ecosystem exceeds $4 billion, and DeFi TVL is $5.69 billion. Block time has dropped to 350ms, and the Alpenglow consensus upgrade will launch in October.
Technically: 95-97 is immediate support, holding it maintains the short-term structure. Breaking below 92.50 weakens momentum, 89-90 is the main support at the 200-day moving average. Resistance above is still 100-103, breaking through requires volume plus continued ETF inflows.
Trading strategy: Light buying in the 95-97 range, stop loss at 92. Add more after breaking and holding above 100, don’t chase at resistance. SOL’s wick is an old tradition.$80K is easy to break. The real question is: can BTC hold it? 👀
Bitcoin’s push above $80K is getting the headlines, but the real battle starts here.
With $1.92B in ETF inflows, this rebound clearly has real demand behind it. But there’s another side to the story: more holders are now sitting on profits, while exchange inflows are picking up — meaning profit-taking pressure is rising.
So BTC is caught between fresh capital and sellers looking to cash out.
#BTC80KHoldOrFold $BTC Bitcoin ETF net inflow on Monday was $337.6 million, marking six consecutive days of inflows totaling $2.26 billion
📊 Key Data
The US spot Bitcoin ETF recorded a net inflow of $337.6 million on Monday, achieving six consecutive trading days of net inflows, with a six-day cumulative inflow of $2.26 billion. Last week alone saw an inflow of $1.92 billion, the strongest single-week inflow since October 2025.
With continued capital returning, the year-to-date ETF cumulative net outflow has narrowed to about $2.57 billion, and the ETF's total net assets have reached $98.56 billion, with a cumulative total net inflow of $54 billion since launch.
On the same day, the Ethereum spot ETF also recorded its sixth consecutive day of inflows, with a single-day inflow of $115.6 million and a six-day total inflow of approximately $812.8 million, showing a dual resonance of institutional capital returning.
Two Objective Interpretations
✅ Positive Signals
1. Continuous multi-day net inflows indicate this is not a single-day pulse of funds but represent a phase of warming institutional allocation willingness; it is no longer just short squeeze-driven contract rallies, but real spot buying entering the market.
2. The capital return combined with US Treasury repo and improved regulatory expectations jointly act as important support for BTC's current push toward the 80,000 level.
⚠️ Need for Rational Perspective
1. Continuous inflows are a strong bullish signal but should not be directly equated with a one-way, never-ending trend; ETFs could turn to outflows at any time, so blindly chasing highs based on a single data point is unwise.
2. ETF funds are a lagging indicator: capital often accelerates inflows after the market has risen for some time; the higher the price, the more cautiously inflow data should be interpreted.
3. To truly confirm the trend going forward, two points must be observed: whether inflows can continue and whether the total stablecoin supply rises in sync, creating incremental capital resonance.
Market Insights
Currently, BTC is near a key round number level; ETFs provide strong support at the bottom, but selling pressure and profit-taking above 80,000 remain significant.
Strategically, do not blindly go long just because of continuous inflows, nor ignore the signal of institutional capital returning. Use 76,000 as an important strong/weak dividing line, maintain a range-bound mindset within this zone, and wait for the broader market to choose a direction.
#BTC breaks through $80,000, can it hold the new level BTC holding near $79,000 while ETH slips below $2,500 points to selective risk appetite, not a broad crypto bid. SOL's relative strength reinforces that view. I would treat this as rotation rather than confirmation of a durable market-wide breakout.
The macro backdrop still matters more than the headline resilience suggests. Falling oil and renewed attention on Treasury buybacks may ease some liquidity anxiety, but BTC needs to hold the $80,000 area before the tape looks convincingly stronger.
Just my read, not advice.This is the current strategy for the two coins ETH and BCH, with backtesting results over the past 3 years. No future functions were used, and weekly data was applied, so it should be relatively accurate and not affected by spike interference. Overall drawdown still needs improvement. However, this is a single-coin independent backtest. In live trading, I open both coins simultaneously, which can to some extent alleviate the drawdown magnitude, with the two coins adjusting each other.BlackRock has lowered the physical subscription threshold for IBIT from $25 million to $1 million. On the surface, this appears to be a product adjustment, but in reality, it is paving a lower-friction entry path for traditional capital. Data shows that IBIT has completed over $5 billion in physical conversions, and Bitwise has also simultaneously lowered its threshold. This means Wall Street is no longer satisfied with buying ETFs with cash but is beginning to offer large BTC holders a smoother migration method.
What I am more concerned about is not the $5 billion figure itself, but the holding structure behind the conversion. For miners, early investors, and institutions, ETF shares are more conducive to compliant custody, auditing, collateralization, and inclusion in asset allocation. They do not need to sell BTC first and then bear the costs of taxes, slippage, and re-establishing positions. This will enhance Bitcoin's usability as financial collateral and may also lead to further tightening of spot circulating supply.
However, this is by no means a simple bullish signal. Physical subscriptions essentially mean Bitcoin is migrating from exchanges or self-custody wallets to the ETF custody system. On-chain visible liquidity decreases, but the tradable shares within the financial system increase. In a bull market, this can amplify institutional allocation efficiency; in a volatile market, ETF shares may also become a more convenient outlet for reducing positions.
Therefore, what is more worth monitoring than price next is whether ETF net inflows, exchange balances, and options positions can improve synchronously. It reminds me of the growth logic of gold ETFs: once assets are standardized, the narrative will eventually shift from speculation to allocation. This is the key point.
(This is only a personal market analysis and does not constitute investment advice)📉Wednesday 8/26｜BTC failed to break 81,000 and pulled back, high-level rotation today awaiting PCE
Last night BTC briefly broke 80,000, reaching a high of $81,200+, but couldn't hold, this morning it retraced to $78,000 then bounced back near $78,500 (24h -0.5%~-1.4%).
ETH simultaneously pulled back from $2,500+ to around $2,440 (-1.6%), SOL dropped below 100 to $96~97 (-5%), altcoins diverged, with PEOPLE/STORJ among those sharply retreating.
🔑 Today's rhythm
• BTC support: $77,000–78,000 (last night's retracement zone + psychological level) → break below targets $75,300
• BTC resistance: $78,800–79,000 → surpass targets $80,000–81,000 (last night's trapped zone)
• ETH support $2,400–2,450 | resistance $2,500–2,550
• Structure: first confirmation of retracement after breaking 80,000, volume contraction pullback, fear and greed index slightly down from 74 to 65, not a reversal but rotation
💡 Characterization
The rally relied on "US Treasury repo + six consecutive ETF inflows (8/24 single day +338 million) + short squeeze," encountering real profit-taking above 80,000.
Tonight 20:30 US July Core PCE (expected YoY 3.3%) is the first test, tomorrow morning Nvidia earnings is the second — stock-crypto linkage period, data leaning dovish/tech stocks stable🔥 BTC surpasses $80,000, but the real main theme might not be "the bull market is back," rather the "devaluation trade" is restarting.
On August 25, BTC stood above $80,000 again after 102 days, ETH returned above $2,500, and SOL briefly broke through $100.
More notably: gold and BTC strengthened simultaneously, while Nvidia fell for seven consecutive days, and the Nasdaq remained under pressure.
This indicates a clear divergence of capital👇
1️⃣ U.S. Treasury buybacks ignite the devaluation trade
The U.S. Treasury expanded the scale of long-term Treasury buybacks, and the market is still betting on the possible use of TGA funds later.
The logic is simple:
Long-term bond yield pressure → Treasury intervention → expectations of a weaker dollar → gold/BTC benefit.
So this BTC rally might not just be a "crypto market recovery" but a pre-pricing of the dollar's declining purchasing power.
However, note: the exact scale of TGA usage remains uncertain, and the market may have already priced in too much expectation.
2️⃣ ETF inflows + short squeeze driving the rally
Last week, BTC spot ETFs saw net inflows of about $1.92 billion, and ETH ETFs about $697 million.
At the same time, a large number of leveraged shorts were liquidated, causing continuous short squeezes after BTC broke $70,000 and $75,000.
So this rally includes both real capital and passive buying.
The question is: after most shorts are cleared, can the market continue to rise relying on new capital inflows?
3️⃣ AI is undergoing valuation verification
The most interesting is Nvidia.
It fell for seven consecutive days before earnings, and the AI hardware sector is under pressure.
The market previously believed:
AI demand explosion → Nvidia earnings beat expectations → AI assets continue to rise.
Now it’s shifting to:
Can AI demand translate into sustained profits?
Once the market moves from "storytelling" to "calculating returns," capital will naturally seek new certainty assets.
Gold and BTC are becoming candidates.
4️⃣ $80,000 is not the end, but a touchstone
What BTC really needs to watch next is not just "can it reach $80,000," but:
Can it hold above $80,000 and break through the $81,000–$83,000 resistance zone?
If it holds, the market may open up further.
If it fails to break through, $75,000–$77,000 may become an important support area.
⚠️ Several key variables this week:
📌 U.S. PCE data
📌 Nvidia earnings
📌 Jackson Hole Symposium
📌 Fed Chair Waller’s first appearance
📌 Employment data benchmark revisions
📌 Next round of U.S. Treasury long-term buybacks on September 9
What truly determines BTC’s next phase might not be a single news item, but:
Treasury buybacks + dollar weakness + ETF inflows + AI capital divergence — can they resonate?
If resonance continues, $80,000 might just be the starting point.
If PCE exceeds expectations, Waller leans hawkish, and Treasury yields surge again, this "devaluation trade" could quickly cool down.
The most important now is not FOMO.
But to focus on two numbers:
BTC: Can $80,000 hold?
Previous high: Can $82,800 be broken?
These two levels may decide whether the next phase is a continued surge or a deeper consolidation. #BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 #美扩大对伊制裁，海峡复航谈判推进 After SOL surged to 100 in this round, I've been waiting for a piece of data. Will the ETF money stop? Another $142 million inflow. It has been a net inflow for 7 consecutive trading days I find this more interesting than a sudden $250 million inflow on a single day. One day could be just sentiment Seven consecutive days at least shows this wave isn't just shorts being forced to liquidate. The day it first turns into a net outflow, I will be especially eager to see. #BTC80KHoldOrFold #IranSanctiYesterday the market was still discussing BTC breaking through $80,000 and SOL standing above $100; today the real question has become: Is $80,000 for BTC and $100 for SOL a new support level, or just a short-term breakout? As of 11:29 HKT, the answer temporarily leans toward the latter—BTC has fallen back below $80,000, SOL has lost the $100 mark, and the pullback in high Beta assets is clearly greater than BTC's. However, the funding situation has not deteriorated in sync, so I currently tend to define this as the first high-level turnover after the breakout, rather than a trend reversal. 1️⃣ 📉 BTC loses $80,000, SOL falls back below $100 Current: BTC: $79,094｜24h -1.93%
ETH: $2,464.08｜-1.69%
SOL: $97.20｜-4.30% Total crypto market cap: $2.668 trillion｜-4.46% BTC dominance: 59.28% Fear and Greed Index: 65｜Greed Yesterday BTC once again stood above $80,000, SOL broke through $100; today both have fallen back below these key levels. But there is a structure worth noting: Total market cap -4.46%, BTC only -1.93%. Meanwhile, BTC dominance remains above 59%. This indicates today looks more like: High Beta assets de-risking → capital flowing back to BTC → overall market cooling down rather than BTC leading a trend collapse first. Why is the US artificially creating a crypto bull market at this time?
The reason is simple, just two words: debt resolution.
The rise in US Treasury yields indicates no one is buying US debt. Trump's think tank proposed a solution—short term, the government buys; long term, the crypto community buys. How does the crypto community buy? With US dollar stablecoins, because the reserve assets of stablecoins must be US Treasuries.
This is a top-level open conspiracy:
US stocks are the first in the world to be tokenized on-chain. As a global premium asset, the 24/7 trading of US stocks will inevitably bring global trading volume growth on-chain, which will drive on-chain prosperity. This on-chain prosperity will continuously benefit crypto's second largest coin $ETH. The interaction between on-chain assets and stocks will form a spiral upward, gradually increasing the total issuance of stablecoins and continuously strengthening the purchasing power for US Treasuries.
This is a national-level contest, ensuring you are on the train to continue watching the historical drama.
#ETH触及2500美元后震荡 Grayscale founder Barry Silbert talked about quite a few things at an event in Bhutan—ZEC, meme coins, and 7×24-hour trading of US stocks.
But there’s one detail almost everyone overlooked.
He said two sentences:
First: "Once US stocks achieve 7×24-hour trading, the appeal of tokenized stocks in the US market will decline."
Second: "But there is still room for development in other regions."
Did you get it?
He’s talking about one thing: the real battleground for tokenized stocks has never been the US.
Most people misunderstand the logic behind tokenized stocks.
You think the value of tokenized stocks is to "enable 24-hour trading of US stocks"?
Wrong.
If US stocks themselves can trade 24/7, why would Americans still buy tokenized versions? They’d just buy the actual stocks directly.
What Silbert is really saying is—the value of tokenized stocks lies in "geographical arbitrage."
They allow people without US stock trading access to get exposure to US stock assets.
Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa, Turkey—investors in these places want to buy Nvidia, Tesla, Apple?
Traditional brokers? The account opening thresholds are ridiculously high. Cross-border remittances? Extremely troublesome. Language barriers? Don’t even mention it.
But with tokenized stocks—you only need a wallet to buy.
Data doesn’t lie.
Currently, the global cumulative trading volume of tokenized stocks has exceeded $20 billion, with global holdings over $1 billion.
80% of tokenized stock trading volume comes from emerging markets.
73% of new users come from emerging markets, and 40% of transaction amounts are under $100.
Binance predicts that the platform’s tokenized stock AUM could reach $10 billion by year-end.
What do these numbers mean?
They show this isn’t speculation—this is real demand.
Young people in Southeast Asia, retail investors in Latin America, entrepreneurs in Africa—they want US stock exposure, but the traditional financial system has locked them out.
Tokenized stocks are the key.
Look at the infrastructure side.
Hyperliquid has launched tokenized stocks, initially supporting 5 assets including NVDAx, SPYx, QQQx.
Robinhood launched its own blockchain, listing 190 tokenized US stocks, covering 120 countries.
OKX has launched over 20 stock perpetuals, covering the Mag 7, targeting Asia, CIS, Latin America, Turkey, and other jurisdictions.
Silbert even said bluntly: the competitive pressure brought by Hyperliquid may accelerate US stocks moving to all-weather trading.
See it?
Crypto trading platforms are evolving from fringe challengers to driving forces behind traditional market infrastructure.
This is the real signal in Silbert’s words—
Tokenized stocks in the US market may just be an appetizer.
The real main course is the billions worldwide without US stock trading access.
600 million in Southeast Asia. 600 million in Latin America. 1.4 billion in Africa. 500 million in the Middle East.
These markets combined are much larger than the US domestic market.
When Robinhood covers 120 countries, when OKX serves Asia and Latin America, when Binance’s users span from Mexico to Brazil to Africa—
this isn’t doing business for Americans. It’s issuing a global ticket to US stocks.
Smart money is already positioning around the logic of "geographical arbitrage."
Those watching US regulatory progress are still reading the news.
Those watching emerging market adoption speed are already counting money.
In the tokenized asset space, don’t just watch what the SEC says; watch what people in Indonesia, Brazil, Nigeria are buying.
Silbert has laid the answer on the table.
Do you see it?
$BTC $ZEC $HYPE #ZEC现货ETF首日成交额1480万美元 🔥A landmark signal: BTC pricing power has shifted!🤔
BTC surged from 60,000 to 80,000, and MSTR, which once never sold coins, has quietly started to reduce holdings.
In the past, this would have been a major bearish signal. But this time the market simply ignored it—spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $1.92 billion in a single week, easily absorbing all the selling pressure.
Previously, everyone treated MSTR as a leveraged BTC tool. Now that logic no longer applies; MSTR is transforming into a Bitcoin bank.
Saylor no longer blindly hoards coins but instead pursues BTC yield per share, struggling to balance between cash, preferred stock, and holdings. STRC bounced from $70 back to $97, temporarily easing the crisis, but the $1.76 billion annual interest dividend looms large, and if the coin price weakens, the pressure will instantly amplify.
Most intriguingly, holding $6.7 billion in cash, he has yet to step in and add positions.
Is he thinking 80,000 is too expensive, or is he guarding against a macro black swan?
Whales no longer unilaterally decide the market; ETF diversified funds are taking over pricing power.
What do you think Saylor is waiting for?👇
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 #Strategy增发扩充现金，BTC配置节奏受关注 #ETH触及2500美元后震荡 $BTC $ETH $OKB From 2021 to 2026: A Full Review of Barry Silbert's "Privacy Asset Conspiracy"
While everyone else was FOMOing AI and memes, one person quietly spent five years stacking an asset abandoned by the market.
Today, this asset surged 70% in one week, hitting an eight-year high.
This is not luck. This is a carefully orchestrated "privacy conspiracy."
🧵 Thread Start
1/ First, let's see what happened today.
On August 26, Grayscale founder Barry Silbert publicly declared in Bhutan: ZEC's long-term market cap could reach one-tenth of BTC — $8,000.
At the same time, he predicted: the US stock market will achieve 7×24-hour trading within five years, and competition from crypto platforms like Hyperliquid will accelerate this process.
This is not an isolated event. It's a hidden thread buried for five years that has finally surfaced.
2/ Let's rewind to 2021.
What was the market doing that year? The afterglow of DeFi summer, the NFT jpeg craze, and various public chains' "Ethereum killer" stories played out one after another.
No one cared about privacy.
But on January 10, 2021, Barry Silbert tweeted: "Looks like 2021 will be a year for privacy protection, decentralization, and resistance to censorship." Then he listed two coins — ZEC and ZEN.
At that time, Grayscale had just resumed trust subscriptions for ZEC and ZEN. Silbert even publicly said, "We like both, and we hold a significant amount of ZEC."
How much was ZEC then? At most around $300. No one took it seriously.
3/ Then what? Then came a long "death cycle."
In 2022, 2023, and 2024, the privacy sector was heavily suppressed by regulators. ZEC fell from its peak to $16 in 2024. Binance even listed it as a candidate for delisting.
Everyone in the market mocked: "Privacy coins are dead," "Compliance is the future," "ZEC will eventually go to zero."
Silbert? He said nothing and kept holding.
4/ The turning point came in the second half of 2025.
In Q3 2025, Arthur Hayes' Maelstrom fund began accumulating large positions in ZEC. In an interview, he said: "I realized the privacy narrative is reviving. Now, underlying crypto players are all complaining that Bitcoin has been hijacked by institutions; we need to truly solve privacy issues, something that belongs to ordinary people."
By the end of 2025, ZEC started soaring from about $50, breaking through $700 in just two months — a more than 12x increase. The privacy narrative officially returned.
Those who mocked at first began to panic.
5/ In 2026, this narrative exploded completely.
In January, Hayes publicly announced his 2026 strategy: "Privacy will become the dominant narrative."
In May, Grayscale officially submitted the Zcash spot ETF application — the first privacy coin ETF in the US.
In June, ZEC flash crashed due to an Orchard vulnerability, and Hayes liquidated his position. The market panicked, thinking "It's over, the narrative is broken."
But Silbert didn't leave. Grayscale not only stayed but submitted the fifth revision of the ETF application on August 21.
On August 25, Grayscale's Zcash ETF (ZCSH) officially listed on NYSE Arca — the world's first Zcash spot ETP.
On the same day, ZEC hit $888, a new high since 2018, with a weekly increase of over 70%.
On August 26, Silbert shouted $8,000.
6/ Connecting this timeline, what do you find?
2021: Silbert publicly supports ZEC — no one believes.
2025: Hayes pushes ZEC into an independent rally — people start paying attention.
August 2026: ZEC ETF launches, price hits an eight-year high, Silbert sets an $8,000 target — everyone is asking "Is it still possible to get in?"
This is not a pump call. This is a five-year-long battle for "privacy asset pricing power."
7/ More intriguingly, Silbert's attitude toward tokenized stocks has shifted.
He admits: once US stocks achieve 7×24-hour trading, the appeal of tokenized stocks in the US market will decline.
What does this mean? He repositions the value of tokenized stocks from "trading time arbitrage" to "geographical arbitrage" — liquidity havens outside the US will be the real battleground.
And the judgment that "Hyperliquid competition accelerates 24/7 US stock trading" is even more severe — crypto trading platforms are evolving from fringe challengers to drivers of traditional market infrastructure.
Traditional finance is not being "disrupted" but being "forced to transform."
8/ Back to ZEC itself.
Silbert's logic is actually simple:
First, ZEC is based on the BTC codebase, with a 21 million supply cap and PoW consensus — technically capable of handling BTC-level capital.
Second, ZEC adds a layer of privacy beyond BTC — shielded transactions can hide sender, receiver, and amount. In an era where AI-driven financial surveillance is constantly upgrading, privacy is not an "option" but a "must-have."
Third, Grayscale's report points out: the market's current valuation of ZEC reflects the assumption that "privacy will remain marginalized." If investors ultimately believe privacy deserves a moderate premium, the current valuation may be seriously undervalued.
In short: the market has not yet priced in the "privacy" attribute.
9/ Here's the hard truth.
While everyone chases the hundredfold riches of memecoins and the grand imagination of AI narratives, what are the true "old OGs" positioning?
Silbert puts it bluntly: Memecoin is essentially gambling. Then he added — "If you must engage in such risky trades, the best choice is to buy ZEC."
What does this mean?
It's not telling you to gamble. It's telling you: even gambling has better targets than memes.
$ZEC $ZEN $BTC #ZEC现货ETF首日成交额1480万美元 $ETH 2500 gained and lost again! Whales are still accumulating, but don't rush for short-term trades
ETH is currently at 2457, down 1.55% in 24h. It touched 2532 yesterday and fell back below 2500 today.
Glassnode data shows that whale addresses holding 1000-10000 ETH have risen from the June low of 4750 to nearly 4850, with a positive net change for 30 consecutive days. Insider whale 819 has maintained a long position of 48.85 million without reduction. Whales are bullish with real money; the signal remains unchanged.
ETH spot ETF reversed eight weeks of outflows, with three consecutive weeks of net inflows since July. However, the daily average is only tens of millions, far below last year's peak of 600-1000 million. Institutions are back but not all in.
2500 is a psychological barrier; once stabilized, look at the 2560-2600 supply zone, with support at 2400 on pullbacks. Today's drop back below 2500 indicates ongoing tug-of-war between bulls and bears. Confirm pullback before entering again for more stability. #ETH fluctuates after hitting $2500 $ETH Don't just see this as "someone wants to buy Copper."
- The key point is not that the acquisition has been finalized, but that the buyer is currently offering about $200 million, which is far from the previously sought valuation of about $500 million.
- This indicates the buyer is pushing for a lower price, showing they are more cautious about the profitability and growth expectations of crypto custody businesses.
- For the market, the signal is very direct: valuations of similar custody and infrastructure companies may be reassessed.
- But don't rush to conclusions; whether Copper will definitely be sold, whether the deal will close, and at what price, none of that is decided yet.
- So the core of this news flash is not "the acquisition has been finalized," but "Copper's valuation has been significantly discounted," making industry consolidation expectations more realistic.Strategy's $5B Question
Strategy isn't simply about buying $BTC anymore.
Its latest moves have pushed its USD reserve to roughly $5.1B, creating a much larger liquidity buffer.
That changes the conversation.
More cash means less forced-selling risk and more flexibility around $BTC purchases, debt and preferred securities.
The big question now:
Does that cash eventually become fresh $BTC demand?
If it does, Strategy could remain one of the market's biggest structural buyers.
$BTC $MSTR$BTC has broken through 80000 again. This round of rally is accompanied by short covering and spot buying inflows. Last week, ETF net inflows reached $1.92 billion, the largest single-week inflow in nearly 10 months. After the price entered a high level, the proportion of short-term holders in profit increased, and profit-taking pressure also rose. This week, PCE inflation, Jackson Hole speech, and employment benchmark revisions are key points. Breaking through 80000 is only. #BTC80KHoldOrFold A small voice carries little weight. Yesterday, when I said SanDisk was going to drop, many brothers argued with me, saying it could rise.
And now? It has dropped, and I guess many brothers are stuck with losses again.
You think my position is small and my words untrustworthy, but look at the $SNDK daily chart—does this trend show any reversal?
Can a single rebound change the direction?
Overall, it’s still a downtrend. This rebound is just giving the bulls a breather; in reality, the entire trend hasn’t changed at all.
Today, SanDisk fell from 1535 to 1461, then bounced back to 1484. Those who shouted "reversal" yesterday are probably quiet now.
Looking at the candlesticks, MA5 is at 1536, MA10 at 1590, MA20 at 1496, MA60 at 1553, and MA120 at 1604.
The price is at 1484, with all moving averages pressing down from above. MA5 and MA10 are accelerating downward, and the bearish alignment is becoming more standard.
Volume is also there—910,000 SNDK traded for 1.35 billion USDT, with selling pressure still dominant.
Those brothers who chased the rise yesterday are probably regretting it now.
I’ve seen this kind of rebound too many times: it drops 200 points, bounces 100 points, then continues to fall.
Every time it bounces, people rush in; every time they rush in, they get stuck.
Samsung’s negative news is still fermenting, the storage sector as a whole is heading down, so how could SanDisk stand alone?
Currently, I still hold short positions, opened at an average price of 1525, current price 1484, floating profit still there, liquidation price at 2004, very far away, no rush to act.
I’ll keep holding the short, waiting for it to break below 1400.
It’s not bias; the candlesticks just move like this.
$BTC
$ETH
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 $ETH is once again hovering around the $2,500 mark today—currently trading near $2,455, down about 1.6%–2.1% in 24 hours, retreating slightly from last night's $2,500+ level to fluctuate between $2,440 and $2,470.
But don't rush to sigh; zoom out for a broader view: over the past 7 days, ETH has gained about 28%, and about 26% over 30 days, marking a "the camel is still bigger than the horse even when skinny" rebound from around $1,800.
💡 The driving forces behind this rally: the U.S. Treasury doubling long-term bond repurchase operations → weakening dollar → improved risk appetite; combined with over $1 billion in short positions liquidated in 24 hours, and spot ETH ETFs seeing net inflows for 5 consecutive days (with a single-day record of $221 million on August 20, the highest in ten months).
In short: shorts have been beaten, bulls are starting to count their money, but the $2,500 gate... it still didn't break through today 😅
⚠️ Short-term support at $2,410–$2,440, resistance at $2,500–$2,550; crypto assets are highly volatile, manage your positions carefully. $ETH I am Cige. BTC has broken through 80000 again. This round of rally is accompanied by short covering and spot buying inflows. Last week, ETF net inflows reached $1.92 billion, the largest single-week inflow in nearly 10 months. After the price entered a high level, the proportion of short-term holders in profit increased, and profit-taking pressure also rose. This week, PCE inflation, Jackson Hole speech, and employment benchmark revisions are key points. Breaking through 80000 is only the firstGrayscale founder Barry Silbert talked about quite a few things at an event in Bhutan—ZEC, meme coins, and 24/7 trading of US stocks.
But there’s one detail almost everyone overlooked.
He said two sentences:
First: "Once US stocks achieve 24/7 trading, the appeal of tokenized stocks in the US market will decline."
Second: "But there is still room for development in other regions."
Did you get it?
He’s talking about one thing: the real battleground for tokenized stocks has never been the US.
Most people misunderstand the logic behind tokenized stocks.
You think the value of tokenized stocks is to "enable 24/7 trading of US stocks"?
Wrong.
If US stocks themselves can trade 24/7, why would Americans still buy tokenized versions? They’d just buy the actual stocks directly.
What Silbert is really saying is—the value of tokenized stocks lies in "geographical arbitrage."
They allow people without access to US stock trading to get exposure to US stock assets.
Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa, Turkey—investors in these places want to buy Nvidia, Tesla, Apple?
Traditional brokers? The account opening thresholds are ridiculously high. Cross-border remittances? Extremely troublesome. Language barriers? Don’t even mention it.
But with tokenized stocks—you only need a wallet to buy.
The data doesn’t lie.
Currently, the global cumulative trading volume of tokenized stocks has exceeded $20 billion, with global holdings over $1 billion.
80% of tokenized stock trading volume comes from emerging markets.
73% of new users come from emerging markets, and 40% of transaction amounts are under $100.
Binance predicts that tokenized stock AUM on its platform could reach $10 billion by year-end.
What do these numbers mean?
They show this isn’t speculation—this is real demand.
Young people in Southeast Asia, retail investors in Latin America, entrepreneurs in Africa—they want US stock exposure, but the traditional financial system has locked them out.
Tokenized stocks are the key.
Look at the infrastructure side.
Hyperliquid has launched tokenized stocks, initially supporting 5 assets including NVDAx, SPYx, QQQx.
Robinhood launched its own blockchain, listing 190 tokenized US stocks, covering 120 countries.
OKX has launched over 20 stock perpetuals, covering the Mag 7, targeting Asia, CIS, Latin America, Turkey, and other jurisdictions.
Silbert even said: the competitive pressure brought by Hyperliquid may accelerate the US stock market’s shift to all-weather trading.
See it?
Crypto trading platforms are evolving from fringe challengers to driving forces behind traditional market infrastructure.
That’s the real signal in Silbert’s words—
Tokenized stocks in the US market might just be an appetizer.
The real main course is the billions worldwide without access to US stock trading.
600 million in Southeast Asia. 600 million in Latin America. 1.4 billion in Africa. 500 million in the Middle East.
These markets combined are much larger than the US domestic market.
When Robinhood covers 120 countries, when OKX serves Asia and Latin America, when Binance’s users span from Mexico to Brazil to Africa—
this isn’t doing business for Americans. It’s issuing a global ticket to US stocks.
Smart money is already positioning around the logic of "geographical arbitrage."
Those watching US regulatory progress are still reading the news.
Those watching emerging market adoption speed are already counting money.
Don’t just watch what the SEC says about tokenized assets; watch what people in Indonesia, Brazil, Nigeria are buying.
Silbert has laid the answer on the table.
Do you see it?
$BTC $HYPE $AAPL $SNDK When I used to watch OKX Simple Earning, I often had the misconception: if the page says 5%, I think the platform gives me 5%. After reading OKX's latest announcement today, I realized that's not the case at all. The money you earn from simple coins in demand is essentially used to lend to borrowers on the platform, leveraged traders, and so on. They pay interest, and we take a portion. So this annualized rate is not a bank fixed deposit rate, but more like: how many people are willing to pay to borrow your coins in the market right now? Starting August 27, OKX is going to change a rather important rule. Previously, users could set their own "minimum lending APR." For example, I say: If it's below 5%, I won't lend my USDT. If the market had only 3% at that time, my money might just be sitting there without a single cent of interest. This setting will be removed from now on. All eligible funds will be pooled into the shared pool. This means two outcomes. First, money that didn't earn interest before is now easier to start earning. Second, you can no longer credit the minimum interest rate yourself; the actual APR may be high or low. So today, my biggest shift in understanding is: Simple Earn Coin Demand is not about "saving money to earn interest," but about "lending funds to the market and sharing in the returns generated by lending demand." According to OKX's current calculations, the loan income will be deducted from a 15% service fee, and the remaining 85% will be distributed to users. Earnings are calculated and distributed hourly. So how do ordinary people play? My thoughts actually became simpler. If USDT is already in your account and nearby,Solana's transaction count hits 4.2 billion, but the next challenge isn't speed
In July, Solana's transaction count reached 4.2 billion, setting a new record; subsequently, SOL rose about 40% in roughly 8 days. The tokenized real-world asset (RWA) volume on-chain also approaches $4 billion.
However, these two figures cannot be equated directly. Transaction count reflects the scale of on-chain activity but does not alone prove real user growth; the RWA volume nearing $4 billion also does not mean these assets have formed widespread trading or lending demand.
What is more worth observing for the Solana ecosystem is: which applications are driving these activities, whether RWAs generate sustained transfer, settlement, or collateral demand, and whether growth depends on short-term incentives.
In the next phase, Solana needs to prove not how many more transactions it can handle, but whether these high-frequency activities can solidify into sustainable financial use cases.
#Solana #SOL #RWAWall Street has surrendered: Crypto, after more than a decade, has forced the halt of a clock that has run for 200 years
Grayscale founder Barry Silbert dropped a bombshell in Bhutan last week——
The U.S. stock market will achieve 7×24-hour trading within 5 years.
You heard that right. The clock that only rings for 6.5 hours a day and closes promptly on weekends might be stopped forever.
And Silbert added a sharp point: if crypto platforms like Hyperliquid keep up the pressure, this process will accelerate even more.
In plain language: crypto is forcing Wall Street to change the rules.
Let's look at the facts—this is not a prediction, it's happening now.
Nasdaq has confirmed that starting December 6, 2026, it will trade 23 hours a day, 5 days a week, with only 1 hour of daily downtime.
The NYSE has also been approved to extend trading hours to 22 hours daily.
The SEC will hold a roundtable on September 17 to formally discuss the implementation of full 24-hour trading.
Did you notice? From Silbert saying "within 5 years" to Nasdaq going to 23 hours as early as December—the pace is faster than anyone expected.
Why?
Because crypto has cornered them.
Compare and you'll see how absurd it is—
Traditional U.S. stocks: weekdays 9:30 to 16:00, 6.5 hours a day. Weekends? Closed. Something big happens overnight? Wait until Monday's open.
Crypto market: 7×24×365, anytime, anywhere, buy when you want, sell when you want.
A system that has run for 200 years is being forced to change by something that has existed for just over a decade.
Nasdaq itself admits: "Investor behavior has changed dramatically. The market needs to be as accessible as the apps investors use daily."
Translation: users are used to trading anytime; if you don't change, they'll go elsewhere.
And Hyperliquid is that "elsewhere."
A decentralized exchange, open year-round, offering perpetual contracts on the S&P 500, Bitcoin, crude oil, even SpaceX.
Wall Street hedge fund traders get a phone alert on the weekend—Trump announces an airstrike on Iran. Traditional markets are closed, but they open a position directly on Hyperliquid.
By Monday's U.S. market open, their positions have already gained several points.
Do you think Wall Street is panicking?
User loss, liquidity loss, pricing power loss.
Crypto isn't just stealing business—it's stealing the power to define the rules.
So what does this mean for the crypto world?
Short term: it is indeed a negative.
The biggest selling point of tokenized U.S. stocks is "I can trade when others are closed." Once the underlying stocks trade 7×24, this advantage disappears.
Silbert himself admits: once U.S. stocks achieve around-the-clock trading, the appeal of tokenized stocks in the U.S. market will decline.
But long term: this is a victory for crypto.
This is not crypto being replaced—it's crypto forcing traditional finance to evolve.
Convergence of systems means capital flows will also converge. Crypto is no longer a "fringe wild path" but a driving force behind traditional infrastructure.
Think about it—a decentralized exchange forcing Nasdaq and NYSE to change their rules. This alone is the greatest recognition for the crypto industry.
Who is the ultimate winner?
The users.
In the future, if you want to trade U.S. stocks, you won't have to wait for the open, worry about time zones, or be bound by a 200-year-old clock.
Buy when you want, sell when you want—free like crypto.
And crypto has transformed from a "challenger" to a "driver."
We're not replacing traditional finance—we're forcing it to get better.
$BTC $HYPE $SNDK $BTC has reached its current position, and many people are starting to think it will only go up!
Last week, BTC rose 22% in a single week, with $1.9 billion net inflow into US spot ETFs, the trend is indeed strong!
But now it is extremely greedy; recently, $1.2 billion in profits were realized in the short term, and BTC inflows to exchanges are at a high since June. It shows that profit-taking has already started.
The US core PCE is the first key point.
If it remains around 3.3%, it will be hard to stimulate the market; if it exceeds expectations, the rate cut expectations will cool down, and BTC will definitely come under pressure.
Also, the Jackson Hole Symposium on Friday, with Powell's speech, is the biggest variable.
With a hawkish bias and inflation risks, BTC will have a decent pullback.
I think the next move will be:
78000–80000 will first consolidate, then pull back to around 75000, with a stronger scenario between 73500–75500.
So I won’t chase now; I’ll wait to see stabilization around 75000 or wait for a volume breakout above 82000 to follow on the right side.
If you want to short, see if there is resistance around 80000, then see if it can break above 82000 with volume.
#BTC突破80000美元，能否站稳新关口 If I had to name this round of the market, I would call it the "brakes on the gas" phase. Have you noticed that every time the market rises to an inviting level, it suddenly quiets down, as if waiting for an answer? BTC broke through 80,000, ETH reclaimed 2,500, but after the rally, both sides started to cool down. Don't rush to call for a reversal; first see what this pullback is actually digesting. Last week's data actually says a lot: Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of about 1.92 billion, and Ethereum ETFs also saw 697 million inflows. This is not a small amount; it is real institutions buying chips at low levels. So my understanding is that this rally is not driven by retail investor sentiment but by real money supporting the market. So now the question is: profit-taking selling pressure vs. new demand—which is fiercer? Looking at the structure, as long as BTC holds the 79,000 to 80,000 range, there's no need to scare itself. ETH, on the other hand, needs to grind 2500 from resistance to support, a process that takes time and volume to match. If ETF inflows keep slowing down, this cooldown feels more like building up energy rather than ending. But I also remind myself of one thing: funds never keep moving in one direction. If ETF inflows clearly slow down in the coming days, or BTC falls below 79,000 without a quick recovery, then it's time to re-examine this "strong consolidation" scenario. The biggest taboo during volatility is to use results to reverse the process. Feel when prices risebitcoin isn’t replacing gold — it’s capturing gold’s “growth” side $XAUT remains around $4,644,quietly fulfilling its role as a safe haven.But $BTC at $78.9K tells a different story: over the past 7 and 30 days,Bitcoin has risen noticeably faster It’s not that gold is weakening.It’s simply that when liquidity risk-on sentiment return,BTC reacts more strongly. Gold is like a safe.Bitcoin is like a growth engine built on the same“scarce asset” narrative Greater upside — but also greater volatility