Orbit Post Sitemap
We could have woken up to one of the biggest crypto disasters imaginable.
A researcher discovered a serious Zcash vulnerability that potentially could have been used to create unlimited $ZEC.
Around $2.3B worth of ZEC was held in the affected private pool, meaning the exploit could have had massive consequences.
He had the opportunity to take advantage of it, but chose to report the vulnerability instead and is now seeking a $750K bounty.
It’s reassuring to see people in crypto still choosing integrity over exploitation.
Honestly, for protecting billions in potential losses, I think a $10M+ reward would be far more appropriate.
#WeakConsumptionFedSplit
#OpenAIAnthropicRace
#SKHynixCapexSurge $BTC A significant change this time is that the market is no longer just discussing "who is buying," but has started discussing "how much BTC can still be bought."
Previously, $BTC, people cared most about how many ETFs flowed in today, whether whales increased their holdings, and how many corporate treasuries bought new shares. Of course, these are important, but they all lie on the demand side of research. What truly makes BTC special is that it's always on the other side—the supply almost never suddenly increases just because the price rises.
So what's really interesting is the stock market.
Although the total BTC supply is close to the 21 million cap, only a portion are actually willing to trade each day. A large amount of Bitcoin has been held long-term in cold wallets, ETFs, corporate treasuries, and long-term holders, with some remaining unmoved for years. In other words, what the market is truly fighting over is not 21 million BTC, but the ever-changing "tradable token pool."
If BTC rises to a certain level and old tokens that haven't moved for a long time start flooding exchanges, then even if ETF funds still flow in daily, the price may suddenly become extremely difficult to push. It's not that institutions are stopping buying, but the market has realized that higher prices have finally awakened sellers who have been dormant for years.
What really determines the price is how many are willing to sell at this price level today.
#MSTR再卖1638枚比特币, scale halved
#比特币与纳指相关性大幅下降: Independence or Illusion 8月3‑9日微策略再度抛售1690枚BTC，成交均价64262美金，套现1.086亿美金全部用来回购自家STRC优先股。
这笔交易依旧低于公司整体持仓成本，市场瞬间掀起关于巨头信仰动摇的大范围讨论。
短期卖币不是看空比特币，本质是在修补自身优先股流动性，信号不能简单片面解读。$BTC $ETH $SNDK $SNDK
Sandisk (SNDK) market analysis
1. News Situation
This is a positive outcome
1. On August 13, Investor Day released a long-term development plan, with management setting a mid-to-high double-digit revenue growth target for 2028-2030, a gross margin target of 80%, and all operating funds returned to shareholders after completing business investments. This statement directly changed the market's pricing logic. Funds no longer simply treat it as a cyclical storage stock, but instead value it as an AI growth asset, driving two consecutive days of sharp gains, with cumulative gains over the past five trading days reaching 35%. Recently, several investment banks have raised their ratings and target prices. JPMorgan Chase has raised it to $2,250, and Bernstein has set a forward target of $3,000, further stimulating bullish sentiment.
2. Expectations for the storage industry continue to heat up, with most forecasts on the industry side that there will be supply shortages next year for NAND flash and AI inference storage, with long-term order schedules tight for manufacturers; SanDisk has already signed long-term contracts with multiple customers to lock in most shipments for the next two years, hedged against flash memory price cycle volatility risks; At the same time, it is advancing new HBF high-bandwidth flash technology with SK Hynix, leaving strong room for market imagination in the AI inference storage sector.
3. The latest financial report shows solid fundamental data. The current actual gross margin is close to the long-term target of 80%, cash flow is sound, debt has been cleared, and the performance base supports the market's imagination for long-term targets.
Negative / hidden risks
1. After a short-term rapid surge, much of the positive news released by investors has already been realized by the market, entering a typical stage where profit-taking is concentrated and the market can be digested in a volatile phase. Previously, after the early August earnings report, the stock price fell short-term, which is a precedent of selling pressure released after expectations were fully inflated.
2. The core driving force behind this round of rally largely comes from a long-term growth story of 3-4 years. Whether long-term goals can be successfully achieved is highly uncertain. If there is any subsequent performance or guidance below expectations, the price correction will be very strong.
3. The stock price is generally at a historical high, with a large amount of previously trapped positions accumulating near the 52-week high of 2354. There is heavy selling pressure in the medium to long term, and the higher it goes, the stronger the resistance to the upward trend will be.
2. Technical aspects of the market
The current price is 1653, currently in a high-level range after consecutive ralls. The previous trading day's intraday range was 1565-1667, with very high turnover during the day. The daily turnover ranked first in the US stock market, indicating extremely high capital competition.
- Short-term first support: The 1560-1570 range, which is the previous trading day's intraday low. If this range can stabilize and hold, the strong short-term upward structure can still be maintained; Once volume increases and the price effectively breaks below 1520, which is the previous day's closing price, this round of short-term strong market will enter a deep oscillating adjustment phase.
- Short-term first resistance: The 1680-1690 range, which is near the recent intraday high. To further open up space, sustained volume support is necessary; If multiple attempts at this level fail, the market will likely start a sideways consolidation in the short term to absorb the large profit-taking positions accumulated over the past few days.
- Volume Status: For two consecutive trading days, trading volume continues to expand, with a large turnover of chips. In such a high-turnover market, either the bulls continue to push higher, and once the funds can't keep up, selling pressure is released quickly, making short-term market reversals very swift.
3. Comprehensive Market Analysis
1. Slightly Bullish Scenario: The stock price holds above 1570, and the relay sentiment continues, with opportunities to further test higher levels. However, as it gets closer to previous historical highs, selling pressure increases, making it harder to climb.
2. Volatility and digestion scenario: This is also a trend with a relatively higher probability at present. After a continuous sharp rally driven by news, the market will enter a high-level sideways consolidation in the next few trading days, digesting short-term profit-taking positions and waiting for new news to catalyze before choosing a direction.
3. Bearish scenario: If the price breaks below 1520 on high volume and fails to recover at the close of the day, the short-term market will enter a deep pullback to test support at lower levels.
Overall, the market is currently in a short-term window for selecting direction after positive news materializes. The changes in trading volume over the next few trading days and whether key support levels can be held are the core points to observe for judging the short-term market direction. #消费动能转弱, September policy is still constrained by inflation #OpenAI与Anthropic估值竞赛升温 Let me break down a key risk in the current futures market.
Bitcoin and Ethereum have yet to find a clear direction, but in the futures market, long positions are becoming increasingly crowded.
As of noon UTC on August 15, BTC perpetual open interest was close to 48.09 billion, and ETH reached 25.36 billion. Both funding rates are positive, with a long-short ratio greater than 1. To put it bluntly, there are many longs now, and the bulls keep spending money to pay funding rates, but the price keeps fluctuating in the original area and hasn't pushed the market upward for a long time.
This is a very awkward and fragile structure: leveraged positions are already full, but the market hasn't cashed out.
If the price rises slightly, many bulls want to take profits and exit, making it hard to sustain the rally; Once the support is broken downward, the crowded bulls will trigger a chain of forced liquidations, amplifying the downward momentum.
Here's a simple observation standard: don't just look long on funding rates—focus on the support level.
If the price stabilizes, it indicates spot funds are taking over; Once support can't hold on, these clustered bulls become the liquidity of the bears.
Chasing higher prices at this level is not cost-effective; hold on to leverage and wait for market direction selection. $BTC $ETH #消费动能转弱, September policy remains constrained by inflation Money isn’t leaving the market — it’s simply waiting.
Inflation has cooled enough to support risk-taking, but crypto still isn’t responding the way the macro setup suggests. $BTC is hovering near $63K, $ETH remains below $1.9K, and $SOL is around $75 — all three looking like they’re waiting for a catalyst.
ETF flows tell the same story. Bitcoin funds have posted three consecutive days of net outflows, while Ethereum spot ETFs saw zero net flow. This doesn’t look like a full exit from crypto. It looks more like capital staying sidelined, waiting for a clear signal before making its next move.
#WeakConsumptionFedSplit
#OpenAIAnthropicRace
#SKHynixCapexSurge THE MARKET DOESN’T LACK MONEY — IT LACKS CONFIRMATION
$BTC is around $63K after failing to hold above $64K, while ETF flows remain mixed.
The key isn’t predicting the next top or bottom. It’s watching whether real spot liquidity is returning to crypto.
I’m watching $BTC, $ETH, $SOL, and $LINK. If $BTC volume rises, $ETH outperforms, and altcoin liquidity expands together, that would be a stronger signal than any short-term pump.
The bull market isn’t confirmed yet.
#BTCETHETFInflowsReturn On 8/14, the seven giants showed mixed gains and losses, with only Tesla and Apple closing higher.
• Tesla +0.68% • Apple +0.22% • Nvidia -0.06% • Google -0.13% • Microsoft -0.30% • Meta -0.86% • Amazon -0.94%
What does this indicate? Funds are no longer blindly grouping together. Only with earnings, guidance, and narrative will people buy. Amazon and Meta were among the biggest losers, and Nvidia also entered a wait-and-see phase ahead of the earnings report (Q2 published on 8/26).
Mega-cap's beta trading is giving way to alpha stock picking.
#标普收盘再创新高, the 8,000-point level is expected to heat up BTC now has an easily overlooked issue: the more ETFs are bought, the more Bitcoin's liquidity structure may actually be more concerning.
Many people see $BTC being continuously drained by $ETH, corporate treasuries, and long-term funds, and their first reaction is positive news. The logic is correct: BTC supply is limited, and after a large amount of tokens enter long-term custody, fewer tokens are truly willing to sell on exchanges. As long as new funds continue to flow in, supply and demand naturally drive prices.
But "fewer circulating chips" actually has two sides.
In a normal market, it can amplify the rise; In extreme markets, it can also amplify the decline.
Suppose a previous exchange had a BTC spot order book thick enough, selling $50 million could only push the price down by 1%. As more BTC is transferred into ETF custody, cold wallets, and corporate treasuries, the chips that truly remain in the market for trading decrease. If order book depth does not grow in tandem, a $50 million market sell order could cause an even greater price shock.
That's why I think we shouldn't simply interpret 'exchange BTC balance decline' as a blind positive news in the future.
What really matters is where the liquidity goes.
If the coin leaves the exchange and ends up in the hands of long-term holders, and the market's market making depth, ETF liquidity, and derivatives market are mature enough, then supply contraction could indeed become a driving force for the market. But if spot chips get thinner while contract leverage increases, the market will actually become more fragile.
Because when BTC truly experiences major volatility, it's often not someone suddenly deciding to sell billions of dollars in spot, but rather the price dropping slightly, triggering the first wave of long liquidations; liquidations continue to sell, pushing the price down; the second batch of positions explodes again, forming a series of price pedals.
The thinner the market, the more likely this feedback is to be amplified.
This is also why different exchanges occasionally show obvious price differences or even insertion of needles. Binance, OKX, and Coinbase all have their own order books, and under normal circumstances, arbitrage funds pull prices very close. But during extreme market conditions, if a platform suddenly experiences massive liquidations and buy orders are not thick enough, local transaction prices may temporarily deviate from other markets.
So when trading BTC contracts, I now pay more attention to three things than before: spot depth, open interest, and concentrated liquidation areas.
If you only look at "institutions are still buying $BTC," it's easy to overlook the other half of the risk.
Institutions buying large amounts of BTC do reduce long-term market supply; But if the remaining chips truly involved in price discovery become fewer, short-term prices may become more sensitive.
Bitcoin's increasing institutionalization does not necessarily mean it is becoming less volatile.
There might even be a very interesting situation:
Normally, they become more steady, but when something really happens, they actually get faster and faster.
$BTC The riskiest market is never when everyone knows in advance that someone wants to sell.
Instead, the market seems calm, and after the first batch of leveraged positions is eliminated, you suddenly realize there aren't as many buy orders below as you might imagine.
#BTC #Bitcoin #合约 #ETF #清算 #流动性 #比特币 #Crypto #欧易星球Risk appetite in U.S. stocks is shifting to on-chain assets, and tokenized stocks are reshaping the true financial asset nature of $SOL. In July, Solana processed about $1.45 billion in tokenized stock transactions, accounting for 82% of the share, and on August 13, Bullish also listed on-chain BLSH shares. If U.S. stocks remain strong and BTC remains sideways, $SOL break above the $78–$80 resistance zone and SOL/BTC strengthen, confirming the narrative of cross-market capital inflows. If on-chain U.S. stock trading volume growth stalls or prices fall below the $75 support, this round of valuation gains will be driven back again.
#Tether首次完整审计: Transparency becomes the focus #霍尔木兹通航谈判未果, pressure from the US and Iran escalatesUS stocks are at the top, $BTC are at the bottom! Where the money flows from, you damn well think about it yourself
The S&P 500 Schiller PE hit 42, the highest since the internet bubble. The Buffett index is 238%, and the stock market is 2.4 times U.S. GDP. The S&P RSI surged to 74.5, clearly in overbought territory
U.S. stocks are flying, while BTC is playing dead. In the past 90 days, the S&P rose 5%, while BTC fell 20%. The correlation dropped to -0.36, a new high for U.S. stocks, and BTC is far below the 2025 high—an extremely rare divergence
But on the other hand, BTC oversold signals have piled up. The monthly RSI hit its second lowest point in 17 years, and 41 out of Glassnode's 45 on-chain indicators simultaneously hit cycle lows. The MVRV ratio has dropped to 0.88, triggering a bottom signal below 1. The seller's risk ratio has dropped to the 3rd percentile of the cycle—historically, every time it reaches this level, it has been a bottom zone
The most crucial point is—someone is quietly taking over. In the first week of August, ETFs saw a net inflow of $626 million, whales increased their holdings by 46,420 BTC in 60 days, and 90 wallets held at least 10,000 BTC, a six-month high
US stocks are overbought to the extreme, BTC is oversold to the extreme. Where the money flows—the answer is already written on the candlestick
Build positions in batches around 63,000, stop loss below 60,000. During the historical frenzy of US stocks, BTC was hovering at 63,000—I've seen this scene before, always with BTC holding out first#海力士扩产提速, whether capital expenditures can deliver returns
The storage sector is facing a new variable as SK Hynix accelerates its expansion pace and significantly increases capital expenditures. The market is also discussing whether such large-scale investments can truly translate into tangible returns in the future.
From an industry perspective, the explosion of AI computing power has driven up storage demand. SK Hynix's expansion is betting on long-term AI storage dividends, but the cost of building large factories is very high, creating considerable uncertainty. If future AI demand falls short of expectations, concentrated capacity release can easily cause oversupply, putting pressure on storage prices, and making it difficult to recoup upfront investments; If demand for AI enterprise-level storage continues to rise, capacity expansion can capture more market share and consolidate its leading position on Nasdaq.
On one hand, overall industry demand is rising, AI storage is booming, the market pie is expanding, and SanDisk can also benefit from industry dividends; On the other hand, SK Hynix is ramping up NAND capacity, which will intensify industry competition. Once supply increases, it will squeeze SanDisk's bargaining space and suppress valuation potential.
In summary: SK Hynix's expansion is betting on long-term AI storage demand, and returns are uncertain. For $SNDK, this means both positive and risky factors coexist; industry dividends come with fiercer competition. When trading, don't just follow news to hype expectations; distinguish between vision and reality. Control risks in high-level tracks and don't rush in impulsively.
$SNDK $SKHYNIX $BTC Falling, Gold Rises: Don't rush to shout "digital gold" tonight; the market is reselecting safe-haven assets
Recently, BTC and gold have shown a clear divergence: BTC has fallen back to around $63,000, while gold has received safe-haven support amid expectations of Fed rate cuts and escalating tensions in Iran.
This once again shows that BTC does not always trade as "digital gold."
A real conduction chain should look like this:
Rising geopolitical risks → rising gold/crude oil → changes in inflation expectations → changes in US Treasury yields and rate cut expectations → ultimately affecting BTC liquidity.
Therefore, if oil prices continue to rise, it may not necessarily be positive for BTC. If oil prices rise too quickly, it may refuel inflation concerns and put pressure on high-beta assets.
In trading, I am more focused on whether BTC can hold above 62,000 during gold's strong momentum. If gold continues to rise while BTC keeps breaking through, it indicates that current funds are clearly leaning more toward traditional safe-haven assets.
Don't trade with a single-line logic like "war = gold rises = BTC rises too." Cross-market trading is most important to observe actual capital choices, not asset marketing labels.
$ETH #消费动能转弱, September policy remains constrained by inflation. #加密估值转向收入, how is BTC priced? I believe the most dangerous thing right now isn't declining consumption, but that people feel "prices will keep rising." This expectation is more troubling for the Fed than the data itself, and September policy is likely to fall into a dead end of "not daring to raise or lower." Here's a detail: although retail sales in July fell 0.6% and people stopped shopping, the one-year inflation forecast in the Michigan survey actually rose from 4.2% to 4.3%. This is very unusual. Usually, when the economy is bad, people think prices should drop, but now people feel that money is worth even less in the coming year. My friends are the same. Although they complain about salaries not rising, they still don't dare wait for big items, fearing they will be more expensive later. Once this kind of "panic price hike expectation" forms, it is very difficult to suppress. So my judgment is: the Fed will be put on fire in September. Let's raise rates. With such poor retail data (the biggest drop since May 2025), they're afraid of crashing the economy; If rates aren't raised, inflation expectations will rise, and you'll fear losing credibility. This dilemma is the most tormenting for the market. Most of my coins and stocks have already been uneven, and then I gradually added a bit of gold and BTC. The logic is to bet on "stagflation": if the economy really stagnates because of high interest rates but inflation doesn't come down, the 200% price will actually rise due to risk aversion. Don't just focus on CPI; it's lagging behind. Focusing on consumers' "psychological expectations" is the anchor for asset pricing in the coming months. The current strategy is: no directional bets, only volatility hedging! #消费动能转弱, September policyAugust 15 | BTC Data Evening Report
BTC real-time quotes
As of press time, BTC is trading near $62,970, with an intraday high of about $63,165 and a low of about $62,538, up about 0.2% in 24 hours. It is still down about 3% over the past seven days.
ETF funds
On August 14, the US spot BTC ETF saw a total net outflow of $56.2 million, marking the third consecutive trading day of net outflow.
From August 12 to 14, there was a cumulative net outflow of about $248.4 million, marking the shift from continuous inflows last week to continuous withdrawals.
On-chain Tokens (Address Calibration)
Consecutive snapshots from August 14 to 15:
Below 10 BTC: net increase of about 84 BTC, latest total holdings about 3.4386 million BTC
10–100 BTC: Net decrease of 345 BTC, latest total holdings about 4.2219 million BTC
Above 100 BTC: net increase of 492 BTC, latest total holdings about 12.4073 million BTC
Inside 100 BTC or more:
100–1,000 BTC: Net increase of 5 BTC, latest about 5.1631 million BTC
1,000–10,000 BTC: Net decrease of 271 BTC, latest about 4.2473 million BTC
10,000–100,000 BTC: Net increase of 758 BTC, latest about 2.2813 million BTC
Above 100,000 BTC: net change of 0 BTC, latest about 715,500 BTC
The total amount above 100 BTC continues to increase, but the incremental volume mainly comes from the 10,000–100,000 BTC range. Other large-denomination tiers have not been strengthened in tandem, so for now, there is still no comprehensive chip concentration.
BTC exchange
The total BTC reserves across all exchanges are about 2.7196 million, with the latest complete window net inflow of about 724 BTC, representing a total reserves increase by about 0.15% compared to the previous period.
While ETFs have been continuously flowing out, exchange balances have not continued to decline, so there has been no favorable resonance on the spot supply side.
Stablecoin liquidity
The total stablecoin market size is about $300.87 billion, up 0.04% in 24 hours, but only about $197 million (+0.07%) over 7 days, and still down 0.4% over 30 days.
USDT was about $183.04 billion, basically flat for 7 days and down 0.56% for 30 days; USDC was about $72.02 billion, down 0.34% over 7 days and 1.63% after 30 days.
On-chain dollar liquidity still hasn't expanded, especially USDC continues to shrink. After ETF funding weakens, there's currently a clear new source of spot capital.
Contract data
BTC open interest is about $48.07 billion, with 24-hour contract turnover of about $37.68 billion, spot trading at about $2.01 billion, and contract turnover about 18.7 times that of spot contracts.
In 24 hours, BTC liquidations amounted to about $14.78 million, with funding rates of about +0.0078% per 8 hours. Recent liquidations have mainly been long positions, but OI has not seen a sharp contraction, indicating that leverage is being slowly reduced, not a thorough cleanup.
Important news today
The SEC's meeting originally planned to discuss crypto project financing exemptions, registration exemptions, and safe harbor rules has been canceled at the last minute, with no new date announced; Meanwhile, the CLARITY Act will only proceed after Congress has concluded.
This means that the regulatory catalyst the market had previously hoped for has shifted back again. Over the past week, BTC fell from above $65,000 to around $63,000, and ETFs have flowed out for three consecutive days. The cooling of regulatory expectations is overlapping with weakening liquidity.
Next, let's focus on the main focus
Currently, the most notable is a set of negative divergences: ETFs have seen outflows for three consecutive days, stablecoins have seen almost no growth for seven days, BTC exchanges have seen net inflows again, but addresses with over 100 BTC have slightly increased.
If ETF outflows stop, exchanges continue net BTC outflows again, and stablecoin weekly increases significantly, it indicates that this is currently a short-term capital retreat; If ETFs continue to flow out, stablecoins remain stagnant, and exchange balances keep increasing, then the individual growth of addresses above 100 BTC will not be enough to offset the pressure on spot funds, further confirming the weakness in liquidity.
$BTC #星球日报 The crypto world is tougher than US stocks in the short term, but this isn't a signal to start the market—it's a fluke to keep you from reaching out recklessly. Keep reading 🤔
$BTC 62,976 +0.47% $ETH 1,882 +0.71%
$QQQ -0.14% $SPY -0.20% $IBIT -0.70%
$DXY -0.31% $GLD +0.63%
US Treasuries and Fed expectations continue to weigh on valuations, while AI/semiconductors remain the emotional switch for US stocks. Trump and tariff lines can switch the pace at any time. On the trading volume chart, $SNDK +3.8% and $CAP -7.1% indicate that funds are not blindly buying stocks.
$BTC gains have narrowed, $ETH is actually more resilient than $BTC, and risk appetite has increased.
$QQQ Not crashing but not strong either; money is still pouring into AI/semiconductors.
$IBIT weaker than $BTC, ETFs are weak first, indicating spot markets aren't going to breathe much longer.
$DXY Relaxed, risk assets finally catch their breath.
$GLD is still rising, and the hedging funds haven't been fully gone.
So don't chase highs; whoever shows weakness first sets today's direction. Keep an eye on $IBIT and $DXY; if they weaken, the market will be controlled by someone else. Let's wait and see.
#特朗普因TruthSocial付费数据流遭起诉🔥老铁们，最近加密市场最火的下饭话题是什么？不是哪个币又插针了，而是BTC和ETH这对难兄难弟，在ETF这条赛道上的画风越来越不一样了。咱今天不捧一踩一，就喝茶聊天，把这背后的市场情绪给你们掰扯掰扯🤔 先把镜头拉到比特币这边。BTC还是那个妥妥的老大哥，机构进场的头号大门，这个地位谁也撼动不了。你看8月第一周，将近8.5亿美金的净流入，那场面，锣鼓喧天，看着就让人上头，说明大户们对BTC的爱还在。但咱得说句实在话，后面的流入数据开始变得忽上忽下，就像姑娘的心情，阴晴不定。这不像是要撤资跑路，更像是机构们开始犯嘀咕了，我在短线仓位里待着，是不是有点烫手？于是大家开始重新打量自己的仓位，生怕在山顶吹久了风，感冒了。 再看ETH这边，画风就沉稳多了。隔壁BTC的ETF流量在玩心跳，ETH这边的资金流入反而走得四平八稳，像个老实人一样闷声攒筹码。这可不能直接说ETH要掀翻BTC的桌子，但事儿确实是这么个事儿：以前机构觉得，嘿嘿，想配点加密资产，买点BTC就完了，省心。现在不一样了，越来越多的大户开始琢磨，把ETH单独拎出来当一盘菜，跟BTC分开下筷子。这种从“一篮子买卖”到“懂得品单品”的老黄下调担保规模，英伟达这套“算力投行”闭环开始装防爆阀了？
英伟达现在的玩法，早就不是单纯卖硬件芯片那么简单了，老黄在做的事情，本质上是在做一家深度的“算力投行”。
你看他过去一两年的打法：左手给下游的 AI 初创公司、算力云平台做股权直投、甚至直接给他们提供大额融资担保；右手让这些拿到钱的客户，转头把支票全额填在英伟达的 GPU 订单上。
这套资本闭环在行业爆发期堪称无敌的增长飞轮——借钱给你买我的卡，我的财报业绩炸裂推高股价，股价涨了再去融更便宜的钱继续扩张生态。
但这套逻辑里藏着一个极其致命的暗门：反身性风险。
说白了，很多拿钱买卡的 AI 初创企业根本没有自我造血能力，全靠资本市场的讲故事热钱在续命。一旦下游应用端迟迟跑不出正向现金流，算力资产就会迅速从抢手货变成闲置资产。到那时候，抵押在银行的算力卡大幅贬值，违约坏账就会顺着担保链条一路反噬到英伟达自己身上。
最近英伟达悄悄下调了部分客户的融资担保规模，这个动作非常耐人寻味。
这说明老黄自己心里比谁都清楚下游的泡沫有多大。趁着现在大家都还在疯狂抢卡，主动收紧信用敞口、把风险往外甩，这明摆着是在给这辆高速狂飙的战车加装防爆阀。
反映到我们二级市场的配置思路上，结论其实非常残酷：
AI 硬件的竞争已经从拼参数，演化到了拼资金安全和抗风险能力。如果要在这个产业链里下注，我只认具备强大自由现金流和全栈生态定价权的平台龙头；至于那些全靠巨头投行闭环和补贴苟活的小算力服务商，一旦行业流动性收紧，最先被清算出局的一定是它们。
对于英伟达这种“既当裁判又当下注人”的资本打法，你觉得是进一步锁死了竞争对手，还是在给下个周期埋雷？
---
以上内容仅代表个人观点，不构成任何投资建议。DYOR，NFA。
#英伟达深入AI资本链，协同与风险如何平衡 I just glanced at the ETF data, and there's an interesting phenomenon.
On Bitcoin's side, it saw a net outflow of nearly 390 million last week, the worst in six weeks. Sounds pretty scary, right? But don't jump to conclusions—ETH quietly flowed in 6.7 million, and the money didn't go far, just moved from Bitcoin to Ethereum.
It's like a family eating $BTC the dishes on that table get cold, and all the chopsticks end up on $ETH. Funds haven't left the crypto market, just changed seats internally.
Why has $ETH suddenly become popular? I think there are three reasons:
First, Fidelity plans to launch a staking feature, with quarterly dividends to be distributed. Institutions are most drawn to this—just holding the unused energy generates cash flow—who wouldn't like that?
Second, the overall environment has changed. Institutions are now paying more attention to the yield-generating ability of assets themselves, and the appeal of price increases alone is diminishing.
Third, BlackRock ETHA has been attracting funds, and large funds still have a willingness to allocate funds, just changing the target.
But on the other hand, the flow of funds is just the first signal—it tells you where money is moving, but it doesn't mean the market will follow immediately. In the end, it all depends on whether the market price accepts it. Whether the direction works depends on the market itself.
Just wait and see, don't rush in. Wait until the prices of Bitcoin and Ethereum truly provide answers, then it's not too late to act.
#高盛收购Neos, crypto ETFs are shifting to earnings competition #消费动能转弱, September policy remains constrained by inflation
The macro economy is now in a very conflicted situation: consumer data is weakening, the economy is showing signs of cooling, but inflation stickiness remains, directly tying down the September easing policy. Expectations for rate cuts have been repeatedly pushed back, and this uncertainty has directly transmitted to the crypto market.
$BTC The current situation is very awkward. Weakening consumption has brought some risk aversion, and people worry about future economic pressure. But persistently high inflation means high interest rates will persist longer, making it difficult to release liquidity quickly. It's hard for Bitcoin to see a straightforward one-sided surge; more of it is a game of existing funds playing back and forth. Good news comes out and there is a pulse rebound, but is quickly suppressed by realistic macro expectations. Range-bound fluctuations will become the norm. To see a major rally, we still need to wait for a clear signal of inflation to pull back.
$ETH They are more sensitive to liquidity expectations and are highly elastic risk assets. Many people think that worsening consumption will accelerate policy easing, but in reality, the opposite is true: if inflation hasn't come down, easing is hard to implement, and pullbacks from disappointed expectations are likely to occur. There may occasionally be small rebounds in the market, but the buying relay is not sustainable; just when a breakout is imminent, it quickly returns to volatility. In trading, you shouldn't bet that easing will arrive soon; after a surge, be alert to profit-takers fleeing in concentration.
Right now, it's a tug-of-war between bulls and bears. Don't focus solely on a single data point and subjectively fantasize about a big market.
This is only a personal trading daily sharing and does not constitute trading adviceOKB还在上涨，今天价格107U
X Layer最近发展势头很猛，X Layer深度绑定OKB，所有的发展需要OKB，利好OKB
OKX明显要做一件大事，以X Layer为基础设施，打造一个链上金融市场，未来在同一个链上账户里，BTC、ETH、稳定币、美股代币、永续合约、预测市场，甚至其他 RWA 资产都能直接交易（这里的RWA 资产你可以直接想象是每家交易所上线的美股化代币，目前不能共通，未来可期）
X Layer运行半年，DeFi TVL 增长近 10 倍，突破 1 亿美元，累计活跃地址突破 420 万，累计链上交易超 4 亿笔，官推说下周还有重要事件公布$OKB Ethereum treasury company Bitmine announced it has arranged 17 cash dividends for BMNP, a 9.5% Class A perpetual preferred share, covering September to December, with the first payout at $0.1583 per share.
High dividends can attract capital, but 9.5% also means financing costs are not low. The core issue for ETH treasury companies is not the number of coins held, but whether asset returns can outpace financing costs in the long term; If ETH continues to move sideways, the spread will become increasingly important.Shorting $SNDK carries extremely high risk. Crowded short positions, negative funding rates, and massive liquidations have already formed the basis for short squeezes; $93.9 billion long-term contracts and industry shortage expectations provide strong catalysts; Macro rate cuts and sector bundling have amplified the intensity of short squeezes.
Short crowding: the underlying fuel of the short squeeze
- Bears dominate: On OKX, the number of short accounts on the market was once 1.8 times that of the bulls, indicating a strong market sentiment skewed toward bearishness
- Funding Rate: SNDK's funding rate is significantly negative, forcing bears to continue paying fees to long positions, resulting in high holding costs
- Liquidation Scale: Within 24 hours, short positions were liquidated nearly $40 million, indicating a clear bearish stampede
Fundamental catalyst: Long-term contracts resonate with industry shortages
- $93.9 billion long-term agreement: Signed weighted long-term supply agreements with eight cloud vendors/AI data centers with a weighted average of over four years, guaranteeing $93.9 billion in revenue
- Performance Guarantee: Clients pay a $16.5 billion performance bond to lock in future income
- Capacity locked: Over 50% of NAND capacity is scheduled for fiscal year 2027, and about two-thirds of NAND capacity is scheduled for long-term contracts in 2028
- Performance and Returns: Targets non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 80% for fiscal years 2028–2030, with plans to return all excess free cash flow to shareholders
- Industry shortage expected: SK hynix warns of "the most severe storage shortage in history" in 2027
- Supply-demand gap: AI server storage demand is more than eight times that of traditional servers, and expansion cycles require 1.5–2 years, making short-term gaps difficult to fill
- Price transmission: Storage chip prices continue to rise and are transmitted downstream, with a clear upward trend
Macro and liquidity: Amplify short squeezing
- Rate cut expectations: U.S. inflation is cooling, valuations in growth sectors are recovering, risk appetite is warming, and selling pressure is easing
- Sector Grouping: Funds are concentrated and stored in the sector, with leading $SNDK continuously receiving incremental long funds, forming a positive cycle
Trading insights
- Avoid contrarian short selling: Under the catalytic pressure of crowded bears and strong fundamentals, short selling has a low win rate and high risk
- Pay attention to liquidator signals: Persistently negative funding rates and high open interest (OI) are leading indicators of short squeeze risk
- Focus on fundamental turning points: Long-term contracts and industry-level supply-demand reversals can fundamentally change pricing logic, with technical aspects giving way to fundamentals
- Beware of chain liquidations: Passive buying triggered by forced liquidations self-reinforcement, forming a cycle of "the higher the price, the flatter it gets; the more it falls, the higher it rises" ($SNDK). Weekly review: Market expectations for the Federal Reserve have finally started to truly loosen.
CPI and PPI have fallen consecutively, and the probability of a rate hike in September has dropped significantly. The macro pressure on risk assets is indeed less than in previous weeks.
But the reality is that long-term U.S. Treasury yields remain high, and the Middle East hasn't truly calmed down. Although AI funds continue to pour in, valuations are getting higher and higher.
Currently, the macro economy is loosening, geopolitical turmoil is stirring, and AI continues to attract money.
For the crypto world, the most noteworthy thing is not a single positive news but whether these positive factors can truly be converted into incremental liquidity.
If expectations for further rate hikes continue to decline and the dollar and Treasury yields start to fall together, then risk assets will truly be comfortable.
Otherwise, the old problem persists: lots of news, lots of stories, but no noticeable increase in money $BTC All the leveraged votes went to BTC, and ETH became the coin no one dared to leverage on
On the afternoon of August 15, BTC was quoted at $63,038, down 0.59% in 24 hours, while ETH was at $1,879, down 0.25%. The market appears calm, but the derivatives market is telling a completely different story: this month, BTC futures open interest (OI) surpassed $40 billion, setting a new high, while ETH's futures OI remains below $20 billion. Keep in mind, BTC's market cap is about five times that of ETH, but the OI gap is just over twofold—no, looking at it from the other side, it's even more alarming: ETH's OI/market value ratio is clearly low, and leveraged funds are seriously lacking in interest.
Futures OI is a very interesting indicator; it measures how much money is "borrowing money to bet on direction" in the market. A record high OI indicates institutions and whales are willing to take on leverage risk on $BTC. A low OI means big money has no interest even in gambling. To put it bluntly: institutions dare to offer 10x leverage on BTC, but only 3x on ETH. This is the "credit rating" the derivatives market assigns to these two coins.
Why has it diverged so much? The core is that BTC and $ETH are two completely different assets for institutions. BTC has spot ETFs, corporate treasury allocations, and a narrative of "digital gold." Spot buying is real and ongoing, and leveraged funds are betting on BTC, backed by spot demand as a bottom. Even when liquidated, some people buy it. What about ETH? Staking yields are falling, on-chain activity is mediocre, the ecosystem story has been told for two years without new tricks, and there is a lack of incremental buying at the spot level. Leveraged funds aren't stupid—leverage without spot demand as a bottom is pure gambling, and one explosion is a chain liquidation. They don't dare to heavily invest in ETH, essentially saying: we can't handle the volatility of this coin.
Behind this is an even colder fact: since August, spot BTC ETFs have seen about $192 million in continuous outflows, with a fear and greed index of only 30. While the market is defensive, BTC's OI is piling up. This is not optimism; this is "crowding." With positive funding rates and falling prices, long leverages are piled high. On August 15, nearly 90% of the market liquidation was by bulls—leveraged bulls are being harvested in waves. So BTC's high open interest is a double-edged sword: it shows BTC is still the only coin treated by institutions as a "legitimate asset," and it also means that once the $62,300 support level is broken by heavy volume, $40 billion leverage will become a powder for accelerated declines. The price range above $64,000 to $65,000 is the uneven pressure zone; bulls must first exhaust their chips to turn around.
ETH's low OI is a safety cushion in the short term and a death sentence reprieve in the long term. No leveraged participation means no short squeeze or short squeeze rally, only relying on spot trading to wear it down slowly. ETH at $1879 lacks not a fundamental story, but the derivatives market's "credit line."
The core contradiction in the market boils down to one sentence: BTC is a belief in leverage, while ETH is an asset no one wants to borrow. Leveraged voting is more honest than any research report—now, all institutional votes are pressing on the leader.How do you view SanDisk's recent surge? $SNDK
The 93.9 billion AI storage long-term contract is indeed a solid positive, locking in long-term orders with 8 major clients, with a large portion of revenue realized in advance. Coupled with new products and high gross margin targets, capital is directly speculating, weakening the NAND cycle, and the short squeeze rally has pushed the price up over 25% in just a few days.
But we need to distinguish between reality and imagination.
Long-term contracts can only smooth out performance fluctuations; they cannot directly eliminate the cyclical nature of storage. Contracts still have floating pricing components, and industry supply pressure remains. The 80% gross margin target is challenging and somewhat optimistic guidance.
The current stock price has already priced in most of the optimistic expectations, with a lot of short-term speculative capital involved.
The incremental growth in AI storage is real, but don't easily believe claims that the cycle is over.
Going forward, focus on order fulfillment, NBM capacity expansion, and gross margin realization. If expectations fall short, the pullback will be severe. People always ask: Is the US stock market at its peak now? This question itself is wrong. It's not about the summit or the mountainside, but about using linear thinking to view a world of probabilities. The historical expected returns of U.S. stock indices (S&P 500, Nasdaq 100) are 8%-13%. This means that, statistically, buying and holding long-term at any time outperforms holding bank deposits in terms of probability expectation. If you are empty for a day, you lose an average return of 0.02 to 3,000 probabilities. A 1 million yuan empty position per day is an opportunity cost of 200-300 yuan. Leaving it for a year, this cost will only increase. Strangely, no one has ever calculated from this perspective. What is the essence of labor income regular investment in US stock indices? Not gambling, not speculation, but turning human capital into financial capital. Your monthly salary is earned through your time. Putting this money in the bank, buying a house, buying gold, or buying US stock indices is essentially just about choosing how to hold your wealth. So why are people willing to hold bank deposits and real estate, yet get hung up on assets like the US stock index, which can generate productivity? The paper money itself is the asset with the worst returns. Holding cash long-term will gradually erode inflation. With extreme risks like war and social unrest, U.S. stocks could indeed crash, but the purchasing power of paper money would drop sharply. Referring to the Republic of China's gold yuan notes and Weimar German marks, paper money resets much faster than stocks in extreme conditions. Banknotes are meant to meet short-term payment needs, covering 1 to 3 years of living expenses. It is not a long-term increaseIf you feel BTC/ETH has recently been held down, the biggest pain point in options might be an explanation
By August 15, $BTC options total open interest at about $25.64 billion, with the biggest pain point on Deribit at $63,000; $ETH options open interest is about $4.31 billion, with a maximum pain point of $1,880. The current price is almost stuck to these two numbers, and this is no coincidence.
The logic is this: near closing, market makers hedge their positions and naturally pull prices closer to the biggest pain point. The position where buyers lose the most is exactly where sellers are most comfortable to collect money. They run casinos and don't take sides, but where the settlement price goes is up to them.
So don't expect any major rally before the end of the month; most likely you'll just keep grinding back and forth to wipe out the option premiums. Chasing breakouts now is mostly just getting slapped in the face by nail climbing back and forth.
When will the nail be pulled out? The moment the delivery hits. The real direction will only be clear after the options expire. Before that, the market is someone else's and the fees are yours.Gained 830% in 21 days, lost everything in 48 hours—this story repeats itself in the crypto world every day. Have you ever wondered why those screenshots of doubling always end with a liquidation? I know many friends who trade contracts. It's not that they're not unsmart; on the contrary, they are very accurate in market observation and have excellent rhythm for short-term trades. But almost everyone will suddenly lose control at some point and return all the hard-earned profits to the market in one go. Recently, I reviewed my trading records and discovered a particularly painful phenomenon: when trading BTC and ETH, my thinking was very clear—I knew exactly when to enter and when to wait, and I executed my stop-loss decisively and efficiently. But once you switch to an unfamiliar coin, your rhythm gets completely thrown off—you can't help but chase highs, take on your orders, and fantasize about the market coming back. Ultimately, this isn't a technical issue—it's about managing emotions. Back to the story itself, several details are particularly intriguing: - It took 5 days for the account to go from 1500u to 5200u, then shrank to 4960u in one day, with a 750u replenishment in between, and then 13000u in 15 days. The returns were indeed impressive, but the drawdown was just as steep. - The last trade with the heaviest losses was short ADA, and it involved consecutive openings, stop-losses, and margin increases to hold on, completely contradicting the trading rhythm I had previously verified. - He later concluded that short-term doubling with BTC and ETH turned into pure gambling at ADA, because he was completely unfamiliar with the market's volatility habits. These are the detailsDon't just focus on US inflation; the yen interest rate hike is the real main event in the macro market ahead.
Many friends have been watching the Fed's moves recently, but the yen is actually the real hidden bomb. According to Japan's latest inflation data, a rate hike in September is basically a done deal. What everyone is truly worried about is not just this one hike, but whether the Bank of Japan will start a continuous rate hike cycle afterward.
While US inflation is cooling down, prices in Japan are heating up. If the yen interest rate rises too quickly causing the US-Japan interest rate spread to narrow rapidly, Japanese funds overseas will rush back crazily, draining liquidity from the dollar market in reverse.
This is also why recently the US and Japan have unusually joined forces to intervene in the exchange rate. The US cannot let Japan collapse, nor dare to let Japanese interest rates run too wild.
Next, focus closely on the two key levels: 160 and 162. If the exchange rate surges above 162 again, Japan will most likely be forced into continuous rate hikes; if it can hold steady below 160, the pace can still catch a breather.
#消费动能转弱，9月政策仍受通胀制约 MSCI has launched a public consultation to redefine the index eligibility for "non-operating companies."
According to MSCI's simulations using financial data from May 2026, if the new rules are implemented, three companies could be removed from the MSCI Global Investable Markets Index system:
▪️ Strategy（MSTR）
▪️ Metaplanet
▪️Yellow Cake
Currently, this is only a public consultation, not an official removal announcement.
The schedule is as follows:
▪️ September 30: Market feedback deadline
▪️ Before October 16: MSCI announces consultation results
▪️ November Index Review: If the rules are passed, they are planned to be implemented at this stage
The direct impact of this incident is passive capital. If MSTR is ultimately removed from the relevant MSCI index, ETFs and passive funds tracking these indices will need to reduce holdings according to the rules.
The index removed its constituent stocks, and passive funds sold simultaneously.
Therefore, the index correction may simultaneously create concentrated technical selling pressure, so the bottom zone is not far off.
More importantly, MSTR's capital circulation depends on the stock price maintaining a certain premium relative to BTC.
If the index excludes the depressed stock price, even if BTC does not fall, MSTR's premium relative to its Bitcoin net asset value may narrow.
After the premium narrows, the efficiency of companies continuing to issue additional financing and purchase BTC will decrease.
So the conduction path is:
MSCI excludes → passive fund selling→ MSTR stock price under pressure→ narrowing the premium relative to BTC→ equity financing efficiency declines→ and BTC purchases slow
This is the most noteworthy impact of the index adjustment on MSTR's long-term pattern.CLARITY 表决待定，SEC 规则也没落地，加密市场现在最烦的不是坏消息，而是“等不到确定性”。
国会法案拖着，SEC 原本要讨论新监管框架的会议又取消。项目方、交易所、基金、做代币化股票的人，全都卡在半空。你说完全没人管，不对；你说规则清楚了，也不对。
这才是最贵的状态。
严格监管至少能算账：注册成本多少、哪些产品能做、哪些不能碰。不确定监管则会让每家公司都多花一层法律成本，还不敢把业务做大。资本最怕的不是红灯，而是红黄绿灯一起闪。
我觉得这也是 BTC 和加密股最近情绪弱的原因之一。市场前面押的是“美国监管终于要清晰”，现在发现国会休会、SEC 延期，叙事又被拖回原地。
加密行业不缺创新，缺的是一个不每天变脸的跑道。
#CLARITY表决待定，SEC规则未落地 The dismantling of the LAB myth: now the market is torn between 'surrender' and 'survival.' The average price ranges from 0.27 to 0.08. Is this decline not an investor's mistake, but a signal of a change in the market structure itself? The original text starts with the pain of $LAB long-term holders, warns of volatility in $CAP, $APR, and $BEAT, and mentions the relative strength of older coins and $OKB such as $ZEC, $BCH, $SHIB, $PEPE, and $TRUMP. The key point in this article is not simply loss reporting, but the fact that a new type of risk called 'infinite decline' has taken root in the market. The $LAB's 70% drop from the average price goes beyond individual stocks, showing how prices are 'detected' in markets without liquidity providers. Assets without real demand become bottomless as soon as passive buying stops. The $APR plummeted from 0.63 to 0.18 in just two days, and the $BEAT plummeted from 5.6 to 0.5 are both structural risks. these #消费动能转弱，9月政策仍受通胀制约
8月以来，美国消费动能明显转弱，学生贷款恢复偿还、超额储蓄耗尽持续压制居民购买力。通胀虽有回落，但服务通胀黏性尤在，7月核心CPI环比仍处高位，使美联储9月陷"稳增长"与"抗通胀"两难。尽管市场押注加息尾声，但官员偏鹰表态频出，若通胀反复，近期美股反弹或将承压。#NVIDIA持有SpaceX约210亿美元, AI collaboration is gaining attention
You know, Nvidia's stake in SpaceX runs much deeper than it appears on the surface. This isn't a financial investment, it's a strategic binding—using 21 billion in chips to weld together the AI destinies of two companies.
According to the SEC's 13F filing on August 14, Nvidia holds about 122.8 million Class A shares of SpaceX, with a quarter-end market value of about $21 billion. Based on the Q2 end price of $170.86, the stock has now shrunk to about $17.2 billion. This is the first time Nvidia has disclosed its SpaceX holdings, originating from a $2 billion investment in xAI in 2025—after xAI was absorbed by SpaceX, its equity would automatically be converted. Additionally, Nvidia also holds about $30 billion in Intel.
More importantly, it is business-level collaboration. On August 4, SpaceX announced a joint development with NVIDIA to develop the Starmind AI1 computing satellite, each equipped with an NVIDIA Vera CPU and Rubin GPU, directly deploying data center-level computing power to low Earth orbit. During the earnings call, Musk made a clear commitment: SpaceX's AI services will be built entirely on NVIDIA systems. Tesla and SpaceX just announced the construction of a $16.8 billion Terafab AI chip gigafactory in Texas.
NVIDIA is not only SpaceX's sixth-largest shareholder but also its exclusive chip supplier, space computing power partner, and AI infrastructure financier. Three layers of relationships stacked together form a "Nvidia-Musk AI Alliance" in the making. For SPCX, this is the endorsement of long-term computing power demand; For NVDA, it is the exclusive channel to sell GPUs into space.
13F discloses holdings at the end of Q2, when SPCX was still above 170, but now it has dropped to the 110-120 range. Nvidia's $21 billion book holdings have shrunk to around $17.2 billion. But what's truly valuable isn't the book numbers, but the chip orders from Starmind satellites and the Terafab factory that haven't been produced yet $NVDA #OpenAI与Anthropic估值竞赛升温
The market has already started pricing these two top-tier AIs before they even hit the market.
$OPENAI Annualized revenue has exceeded $40 billion, nearly doubling compared to the end of 2025; $ANTHROPIC Q2 preliminary revenue exceeded $11.5 billion, more than doubling the quarter alone.
The most outrageous thing is valuation.
Anthropic's last funding round was valued at $965 billion, and the market has even begun discussing IPO valuations exceeding $2 trillion. If OpenAI enters the capital market in the future, its valuation potential will also be significant.
This is interesting: even before the company goes public, the capital market has already priced in its growth expectations for the coming years.
But what I think is truly worth paying attention to is not whether they can reach a trillion dollars, but rather what will they offer in the future with such high valuations?
AI revenue growth is indeed strong, but behind it lies massive investments in GPUs, data centers, and computing power. As long as revenue growth can be sustained and profit margins improve, these valuations may be gradually absorbed by earnings; But if revenue growth slows while computing power investment continues to burn through cash, then the current high valuations could become a pressure on the entire AI industry chain.
So I prefer to see the listings of these two companies as a stress test.
If OpenAI and Anthropic ultimately support their $1 trillion or even $2 trillion valuations with earnings, the valuation logic for AI chips, servers, storage, and data centers could continue to rise. Conversely, if after the IPO the market finds that "the story is big but profits haven't caught up," the first wave of repricing may not just be AI companies, but the entire AI industry chain.
It's still hard to say where the biggest AI bubble lies. But before the two top AI companies have even hit the market, the market has already bet in advance.
The above is just my personal opinion and does not constitute any investment advice!日元汇率强劲反弹正在迫使跨境套利资金加速平仓。美日利差收窄预期抽离了美股科技股与 $BTC 的即时流动性，引发跨市场去杠杆共振。若美联储仅温和降息或日本央行放缓紧缩，平仓抛压将边际减弱并带动估值修复；若降息幅度扩大叠加美日利差骤缩，资产端将面临更深的流动性折价。一旦美元指数获得对冲支撑或风险偏好提前回暖，挤压逻辑将转向失效。后续重点观察美日外汇波动率与美债收益率的变动斜率。
#霍尔木兹通航谈判未果，美伊施压升级 #财报观察员：AI基建财报接力登场$ETH Beginning to Develop a Different Capital Structure from $BTC: Has the Counterfeit Rotation Really Arrived?
On August 13, BTC ETFs saw a net outflow of about $131 million, but spot ETH ETFs still recorded a net inflow of about $5.9 million that day; by August 14, ETH ETFs saw a rare zero net inflow/outflow.
This shows that capital is not simply "completely fleeing crypto," but is reselecting assets.
To determine whether ETH can become the next main theme, I won't just look at ETH/USDT, but rather at three conditions:
ETH/BTC continued to rise, ETH regained the $2,000 mark, and ETFs resumed continuous net inflows.
Only when all three conditions appear simultaneously does it look more like true capital rotation.
If ETH rises but ETH/BTC continues to weaken, it is mostly just beta triggered by BTC's rebound and cannot be called an independent market.
Risk Boundaries: A single day of ETF inflows or zero flow cannot define a trend. What is truly worth trading is continuity, not a snapshot of data from a single day.
#消费动能转弱, September policy remains constrained by inflation. #加密估值转向收入, how is BTC priced? #就业数据大幅走弱, there is repeated debate over rate cut expectations in September
I believe the probability of a Fed rate cut in September is rising, but don't start a frenzy right away, because the shadow of recession hasn't lifted yet. At this stage, it's not the time to blindly jump into alt risk coins.
Looking at the data, it's clear that nonfarm payrolls in July were negative, marking the worst employment performance so far this year.
Recently, I have been browsing overseas consumer information. Although many people's nominal income is still intact, discretionary consumption is clearly shrinking. Unnecessary expenses are cut whenever possible. This is a sign of weakening employment, and people are starting to lose confidence about future incomes.
With employment data continuing to weaken and the economy starting to cool, the Fed's confidence in maintaining high interest rates in September is weak.
But wage stickiness remains, inflation hasn't fully returned to the target range, and reckless continued easing will push prices up again, so policymakers won't take a gamble lightly.
So I'm currently operating conservatively: most high-volatility altcoins have gradually reduced their holdings, and small positions are gradually allocated to Bitcoin and Ethereum.
The logic is simple: if employment continues to deteriorate and US Treasuries and the dollar weakens, BTC and ETH have safe-haven and volatility-resistant properties; If inflation rebounds again and interest rates remain high, the mainstream coins held will be more resilient to declines than smaller ones.
In summary, the current market is under pressure above and supported below; do not bet on unilateral surges or drops.
For ordinary traders, keeping sufficient cash at this stage and prioritizing allocation to mainstream assets with good liquidity is far safer than blindly bottom-fishing various altcoins.
$BTC C $ETH
#消费动能转弱, September policy remains constrained by inflation
#加密估值转向收入, how is BTC priced?
#特朗普因TruthSocial付费数据流遭起诉 $SNDK #闪迪投资者日后股价大涨, long-term goals remain to be verified
SanDisk Investor Day painted a cake that made Wall Street drool
On August 13, SanDisk held its 2026 Investor Day, directly presenting a "explosive" long-term financial blueprint to the market. The stock price surged nearly 14% that day, becoming one of the best-performing stocks in the S&P 500. It rose over 3.8% before Friday's market closed, then continued to rally after hours.
Why is it so fierce this time? The core is three things:
First, financial targets far exceed expectations. SanDisk expects annual revenue growth in the medium to high double digits from fiscal years 2028 to 2030, with gross margin reaching 80%, operating margin 75%, and free cash flow 50%. For a traditional NAND storage manufacturer, these figures are truly staggering.
Second, it introduced a new business model (NBM) to smooth out the cycle. The memory chip industry has always experienced dramatic ups and downs—profits when prices rise, losses painfully when prices fall. SanDisk has now signed long-term agreements with eight clients, with a weighted average term of four years, fixed prices in the near term, and upper and lower limits for forward terms. Currently, the total contract value is about $94 billion, and by 2027, about 50% of shipments will be covered. This means it has locked in revenue and profits for the coming years in advance.
Third, spending money to buy back shares. The board added $14 billion in buyback capacity, bringing the total remaining buyback capacity to about $15.5 billion, and also promised to return 100% of excess free cash flow to shareholders. The measures were indeed strong.
There's also AI imagination—SanDisk's HBF (High Bandwidth Flash Memory) aims to serve as an "intermediate layer" during AI inference, with capacity up to 16 times that of HBM. That's quite a big pie.
Institutions responded positively: Goldman Sachs reiterated a buy with a target price of $2,200; JPMorgan Chase raised its target to overweight with a target price of $2,250; Susquehanna went even further, pushing the target price directly to $3,250. The average price target on Wall Street was about $2,209.
2. Technical Aspects: Short-term momentum remains, but be cautious when chasing highs
From the screenshot you posted, SanDisk's latest price is $1653.84, with a 24-hour high of 1687 and a low of 1567. MACD's DIFF is 1.18, DEA is -60.95, and the histogram is 124.25—DIFF just crossed above DEA, forming a golden cross, and short-term momentum has indeed turned positive.
However, there are a few points to note:
First, this rebound has been rising from a low of $1,212 on August 7. It rose more than 30% in just one week, which is indeed fast.
Second, in terms of technical indicators, the MA5 is above the MA10, with a golden cross not broken, indicating the short-term structure remains relatively strong. The MACD histogram remains positive, and DIF is above the DEA, supporting the current bullish momentum.
Third, but there is a risk—the cost-effectiveness of chasing after a sharp rise is declining. Some analysts have bluntly stated, "After such a sharp rise, chasing prices directly at resistance levels carries higher risks than waiting for confirmation or controlled pullbacks." Key support is at 1242 and 1200.
To put it bluntly, SanDisk's short-term technical outlook is indeed good, but this wave of gains has already absorbed much of the positive news from investors' days. Whether it can continue to rise depends on whether the market is willing to pay for the long-term story of "80% gross margin, 75% operating profit margin."
3. The entire storage sector is rising
SanDisk's rise has lifted the entire storage sector. On Friday, the storage sector collectively rose, with $MU up over 3%, $Western Digital ($WDC) up over 3%, $SK Hynix ($SKHY) and $Seagate Technology ($STX) also up over 2%.
$Micron Technology (MU) has risen about 9.3% in the past week. On August 12 and 13, it rose more than 4% for two consecutive days, and on the 14th, it surged intraday to $984, setting a recent high. UBS reiterated its buy with a target price of $1,625, with the core logic being tight supply and demand for HBM and DRAM exceeding expectations. However, the technical side is somewhat overheated — KDJ's J value of 96 has already entered overbought territory, so short-term attention should be paid to pullback pressure. Another risk point: Apple is testing memory chips from China's Changxin Memory. If Apple does purchase it, it could challenge HBM's pricing power.
$Western Digital (WDC) also rose, closing at $508.80 on August 14, up 4.41%. The intraday high surged to $516.
4. To be honest: long-term goals have not yet been verified
SanDisk's investor day is indeed beautiful, but there are a few pitfalls you need to think carefully:
First, whether long-term contracts can truly stabilize the cycle still needs time to prove. Goldman Sachs itself said this "still takes time before it can be fully reflected in valuation multiples." The NAND industry is too cyclical—can a single contract really change everything? The market is still watching and waiting.
Second, on August 5, SanDisk had a major incident—after the earnings report, its stock price plunged over 11%, all because next quarter's revenue guidance was $10.3–$10.8 billion, below the market expectation of $10.82 billion. This shows that the market's expectations for SanDisk have been set very high; if it falls slightly short of expectations, it's a heavy blow.
Third, the current stock price is $1,653, with Goldman Sachs' target price of $2,200, meaning there's still 33% room left—but only if the "$110 regular earnings per share" is realized. If AI storage demand falls short of expectations or NAND prices start to fall, the logic will have to be recalculated.
So the conclusion is simple: short-term sentiment and capital flow are on SanDisk's side, and technical indicators support continued bullishness, but don't assume the long-term guidance from Investor Day is already realized. This rally is supported by fundamentals, but more about trading for a "bright future." Whether this future can become reality depends on the performance of the next few quarters. The storage sector is currently generally hot, but before chasing highs, it's best to think carefully whether to buy the swing or truly believe in that long-term story.
The above content is compiled based on publicly available market information and does not constitute any investment advice.The bank started selling coins directly to the exchange and reverted to the backend
Israel's largest bank, Leumi, did something this week that left many people in the old crypto community a bit stunned. They partnered with crypto service provider Galaxy, allowing their 2.5 million customers to directly buy and sell Bitcoin, Ethereum, and SOL within the bank's own app. No need to open exchange accounts or go through complicated identity checks—just open the banking software used to check salaries and pay utility bills, and you can buy coins.
This scene was unimaginable five years ago. Back then, the industry's slogan was 'Be your own bank'—you wanted to bypass the bank, take your private key, and no one would manage your money. But now, the role everyone most wants to get rid of has come knocking on you to sell coins.
What's even more intriguing is that some media have arranged for banks to push crypto trading into their apps, while exchanges are relegating to the backend of the financial system. Thinking about it, this is indeed the logic. The first entry point for ordinary people to buy coins is gradually shifting from independent exchanges like Binance and OKX to the banking software installed on their phones. Exchanges haven't disappeared; they have just moved from the front to the back, handling liquidity clearing and underlying matchmaking, while banks firmly occupy the screen closest to users.
This is not an isolated case. Over the past year, from East Asia to Europe, traditional financial institutions have been increasingly active in crypto. Some banks use licenses as compliance channels, while others directly embed transaction interfaces into their own apps. The direction is surprisingly aligned, all aimed at blocking the first barrier for users to enter. Of course, it's convenient for users, but its impact on industry power structures is far deeper than a single market fluctuation.
What does this mean for us? First, the threshold has really collapsed. In the past, persuading family members to buy things was enough to discourage a group of people just by explaining wallet mnemonic phrases and withdrawal addresses. Now, with one-click banking access, crypto assets have been packaged into a routine operation comparable to buying funds and exchanging foreign currency. Institutional funds are coming in more smoothly, and compliance channels are right under your nose.
But the other side is also quite ironic. The earliest crypto people believed decentralization meant no intermediaries, but now the biggest selling point has become banks selling for me. When buying coins becomes as convenient as withdrawing money from an ATM, how much of the original intention about sovereignty and censorship remains is real, and how much remains is just marketing rhetoric, worth weighing for everyone.
Banks aren't here for charity. What matters to them is fees and reasons to retain customers. Once traditional finance blocks the entry point, it's still unclear where the crypto world's influence will shift. Are you willing to hand the buying of coins back to the banks?Ethereum has hit rock bottom—did you see it?
Ethereum NUPL data on the platform has recently fallen to its historical low, and some analysts say this may be a strengthening signal of a temporary bottom. The NUPL indicator simply shows whether all market holders are profiting or losing. The lower the value, the more people are trapped and the closer the sell-off is to clearing out. Panic is easing, and selling pressure is almost gone.
How low is this level now? It has returned to the range historically seen only near the bottom, meaning most on-chain ETH holders are already in floating losses. Note that it refers to a phased bottom, not an immediate reversal. The bottom can be worn down for a long time. Historically, the bottom range has been horizontal for several months. Don't rush in just because you see a low price; many people just jump in too early, and the cheaper it is, the more you have to hold back.
How should the market correspond? ETH has been fluctuating around 1900 these past two days, similar to BTC stepping on the 200-week moving average—just hit the long-term cost line but the volume hasn't caught up. Spot ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive days, with institutions not coming back to buy them. Relying solely on retail investors reluctant to sell cannot sustain the rally, and there is also on-chain buying pressure like Lido's LDO automatic buyback, but the annual cap is only $10 million, so the scale is too limited to support the overall trend.
This indicator is useful for you in position rhythm. When it hits a historical bottom, it usually means fewer panic positions pushing further down, but it also means market sentiment has frozen to the extreme. A rebound needs real money as a catalyst, not just a rise by the indicator itself. Don't treat it as a bottom-fishing signal in the short term. If you're optimistic about the ETH ecosystem in the long term, this extreme undervaluation zone is actually a window for slowly accumulating chips, provided you use idle cash, don't use leverage, and steadily move in batches.
Also, ETH's staking ratio is not low. When panic hits, unlocking and withdrawing will amplify selling pressure. Don't think that locking on-chain means safe; locked coins can still be released during panic. The bottom is never ground down by faith. Again, indicators are a rearview mirror, not a steering wheel. They tell you it's already cheap, but it doesn't tell you when prices will rise. Using a dollar-cost averaging approach to bet on directions is more reliable; don't treat historical bottoms as triggers for bottom-fishing. Here's the contradiction: indicators say it's cheap, while funds say they're still withdrawing—two signals clash. Do you trust the data or the wallet?
Are you currently fully invested or short on ETH? Do you dare to buy within this range?卖铲子的月入千万发币的却亏到麻
很多人盯着 meme 币涨跌，却没看明白真正赚钱的是谁。Pump.fun 和 GMGN 这类平台，自己不发币不接盘，就靠给炒 meme 的人提供工具，每个月能进账千万美元级别，比绝大多数发币项目都稳，旱涝保收，这钱赚得比发币轻松多了。
这逻辑像极了当年的淘金热。满山找金子的人九成亏，卖铲子卖牛仔裤的先富了。链上数据平台抽的是每一笔交易的手续费和跟单分润，不管你买的 SHIB PEPE BONK 是涨是跌，只要你在上面买卖、在群里跟单，它们就稳定抽成，流水天天进账，不关心你亏还是赚。
反差特别扎心。一个散户拿 1 万块冲 meme，追 KOL 喊的单，一周下来可能剩 4000，而卖铲子的服务器跑着，市场越疯它们越肥。GMGN 们赚的是情绪税，牛市熊市都有人赌，所以这类生意永远有饭吃，不会像某枚 meme 币那样一夜归零，平台本身几乎没归零风险，根本不在乎你亏不亏。
对咱们的意义很直接。如果你想在 meme 里活下来，先想清楚你是去挖金子还是去买铲子。前者靠运气和手速，后者靠的是别人持续的赌博欲。普通人既没信息优势也没速度优势，冲进去基本就是给手续费池充值，你赚的还没被抽走的多，长期算下来必输。
你以为你在跟庄家博弈，其实你连对手盘是谁都看不见，KOL 喊单的那一刻他早就埋好了，信息差大到你根本没得玩，认清楚这点比研究十张图表都重要。短线上 meme 板块还是情绪驱动，哪个叙事火就哪波先拉，但绝大部分撑不过一周就被新的叙事盖过去，你刚上车别人就撤了。长线看这类卖铲生意反而比单个 meme 币更稳，因为它吃的是整个赛道的流量而不是某一枚币的命。
你们在 meme 上是挖金子的还是买铲子的，今年回本了吗？The market that was said to be ready for a rate hike has quietly changed its mind.
The Fed's drama this week took a bit of a turn. The latest PPI came out flat month-over-month, and the previous day's CPI only rose slightly. Both inflation data points weakened together, directly softening the internal hawkish argument that inflation can't be controlled without a rate hike. The market still prices in over a 90% chance of a rate hike before the end of the year, but it's no longer as certain as it was at the beginning of the month; the tone has loosened.
Since Wash took office, there has been no forward guidance, and Trump at the White House is still publicly calling for large rate cuts, criticizing those who don't cooperate as hostile. On one hand, data forces caution; on the other, politics pushes for easing. The Fed is caught in the middle and feels the most pressure. Cleveland's member Hamarack even pushed back, saying action should be taken now to bring inflation back to 2%. There's no internal consensus, and this kind of division is exactly the uncertainty the market fears most.
What does this have to do with crypto? A lot. Interest rates are the master switch for liquidity. When the dollar strengthens, funds flow out of risk assets, and high beta assets like BTC and ETH take the hardest hit. Previously, the market feared rate hikes would suppress valuations. Now that data is weakening, the urgency for hikes has eased, which is a relief for risk assets. But note, it's a relief, not a reversal. The Fed hasn't mentioned any rate cuts, and Bank of America's report still advises avoiding bonds and the dollar. The broad asset framework remains unchanged.
Looking at the market, BTC is still grinding between 640,000 and 650,000 (units as per original), and ETF net outflows for three consecutive days indicate institutions are still withdrawing. Macro conditions have given a bit of breathing room, but until liquidity returns, this breath won't support a decent trend. Coinbase premiums have been negative for over eighty days straight; the lack of demand from Americans is a hard problem. Price support can't rely solely on rate cut expectations; gold and commodities are actually more favored by capital.
The US Treasury size is approaching 40 trillion, with debt servicing pressure looming. Long-term yields are the real big variable. The Fed is squeezed from both ends—raising rates risks economic collapse, not raising risks sticky inflation. This dilemma is a hotbed for crypto's repeated sideways moves. No matter how attractive rate cut expectations are, they require continuous data confirmation. Right now, it's just guessing, and markets based on guesses are most easily slapped down by a single data point. For the short term, what matters to you is not to mistake macro tailwinds as a charge signal. For the long term, the liquidity turning point depends on actual rate cuts landing and ETFs returning to net inflows. Do you think there will be another rate hike this year?$OKB
OKB is still rising, today priced at 107U
Just look at my pinned posts—I started regular investing in OKB in February this year, with prices between 60-90, so the current average price is 83U. But these past few days, the price has been rising, which has pushed my average price higher, which is really frustrating
I don't dare to pause regular investing now because X Layer has been developing rapidly recently. X Layer is deeply tied to OKB, and all development needs OKB, which is good for OKB
OKX is clearly aiming for something big: using X Layer as infrastructure to build an on-chain financial market. In the future, within the same on-chain account, BTC, ETH, stablecoins, US stock tokens, perpetual contracts, prediction markets, and even other RWA assets can be directly traded (here, RWA assets can be imagined as US-listed tokens listed on each exchange, currently not interchangeable, but promising in the future).
After half a year of operation, X Layer's DeFi TVL grew nearly tenfold, surpassing $100 million, with cumulative active addresses surpassing 4.2 million and over 400 million on-chain transactions. The official Twitter said there will be important events next week. I'm quite worried that positive news will drive prices up, because my regular investment is still far from enough Projects that claim decentralization end up getting licenses issued by the Federal Reserve
World Liberty did something quite embarrassing in the past couple of days. The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued its Trust Company a conditional banking license, allowing it to conduct trust business and related activities as a national trust bank. Note that this is the crypto project deeply tied to the Trump family—while promoting decentralization, they pocket federal licenses, not negligible.
This license isn't given out casually; the OCC says it will only be approved after meeting the pre-opening requirements. But getting preliminary conditional approval already shows that crypto companies are opening their way into the traditional financial system. With this license, World Liberty can legitimately compete with banks for core businesses like custody and stablecoins, and can open accounts and access real funds for large clients—essentially stepping into the backend of mainstream finance.
This is where the contrast lies. A few years ago, these people loved to criticize banks as middlemen for profiting from the spread; now they line up to get regulatory passes. The reason is simple: to grow big in the US, you have to enter that system; only with a license can you stand at the top of liquidity. First, stablecoin issuers like Circle desperately pushed for compliance; later, Wintermute went to the SEC to get broker licenses. The path was surprisingly consistent: crypto companies moved into traditional finance, tearing down both sides at once.
How should we interpret the market situation? The stablecoin card game is being rescheduled, with licensed players entering beyond USDT and USDC, meaning the battleground for compliant stablecoins will become even more crowded next year. For a large market like BTC and ETH, there is no direct short-term impact, but the friction between institutions entering and exiting is decreasing, and pricing power continues to concentrate on licensees—a definite slow trend. Whoever has a license can bid simultaneously across more markets, while those without can only be pushed to the margins.
For ordinary people, this is just an emotional story in the short term. Don't think a token is about to take off just because of the license. The seat on the regulatory card table has nothing to do with your holdings. If it really has an impact, it will have to wait six months for the water to flow in. In the long run, compliance is like connecting the faucet to the mainstream financial pipeline. The water level will rise, but today you can't move your candlestick or change Coinbase's monthly negative premium.
Which side do you believe in more—the ideal of decentralization, or the federal license in your hands? #加密估值转向收入, how is BTC priced? 行情解读｜SNDK多空剧烈博弈，短期逼空与中期增长分歧交锋
📌核心：SNDK已经进入预期差主导行情，短期被股东回报利好持续推升，但中长期资金开始质疑增长天花板，轧空风险是空头最大阻碍。
核心要点
1. 股价对消息极度敏感
Q4业绩亮眼，但指引不及预期盘后大跌超7%；投资者日宣布返还利润，盘中暴力反弹近18%。现阶段交易的是未来增速预期，消息极易引发剧烈换手。
2. 英伟达SpaceX持仓分歧仍在
该股权大概率来自xAI并购转换，并非近期增持。马斯克算力叙事火热，但市场同时担忧关联交易风险，暂未形成一致利多。
3. 空头逻辑
利润优先返还股东，侧面反映扩产再投入意愿下降，AI高增长或临近见顶；叠加市场对业绩指引敏感度极高，后续指引走弱容易触发恐慌抛盘。
4. 短期最大风险是轧空
当前看空盘堆积较多，多头情绪未退潮前，容易出现空头平仓踩踏推高价格。重点观察月底财报的需求指引，用来验证趋势拐点。
交易启示：预期行情短期看情绪，中期看指引，逆势做空热门成长股，务必警惕轧空风险。
风险提示：仅交易心得解读，不构成投资建议，成长股波动剧烈，请严控仓位止损。 都说非托管钱包最安全直到它宣布关门
今天Cosmostation官方挂出一份公告，说从9月1日开始，这个钱包只保留导出助记词和私钥这一个功能，其他全部关掉。iOS版、安卓版、Chrome插件，一起下线。这是Cosmos生态里体量第二大的钱包。
公告写得很克制，反复强调一句话：钱包是非托管的，你的资产在各条链上，不在我们服务器里。所以不用慌，只要在9月1日前把助记词或者私钥导出来，换个支持导入的钱包接着管就行。
听起来完全没问题。非托管这三个字，这几年一直是行业最骄傲的部分。我们碰不到你的钱，我们哪天不干了你也不会有事。逻辑上确实成立。
但真到执行那一步，事情就变得具体了。有多少人当年建钱包的时候，真的抄了那十二个词，抄在纸上收进抽屉？有多少人是随手截了张图丢进相册，或者干脆点了下一步就过去了。更麻烦的是，Cosmos这套体系里很多人的币不是躺在钱包里，是委托给验证节点在质押，要动这部分钱得先解绑，而解绑期是21天。
从今天数到9月1日，只剩半个多月。也就是说，如果现在才发起解绑，币解出来的时候这个钱包的界面可能已经打不开了。资产当然还在链上，理论上导入别的钱包一样能操作，前提是你手上有那串助记词。
还有个更现实的问题，这类公告的到达率其实很低。真正把币放着不动好几年的人，多半也不刷推特、不看官方频道。等他哪天想起来打开App，发现只剩一个导出按钮，运气好的还能救回来，运气不好的连这个按钮都点不明白。
这事让我想起前两周Coldcard那一波。固件里藏了个漏洞，一千多枚大饼被搬走，损失超过一亿美元，社区连夜大规模迁移，链上活跃地址数直接冲到一年多来的高点。那次是代码出了问题，这次是公司不想做了。看着是两回事，落到用户身上是同一件事：你手上那份备份到底还有没有效，只有你自己知道，而且往往是在最需要它的那一刻才知道。
钱包这门生意本来就难做。不收托管费，不碰用户资产，收入靠验证节点、靠交易路由、靠生态补贴。生态热的时候撑得住，生态一冷，维护多端客户端就变成纯支出。Cosmostation做了这么多年，退出的时候没闹也没有指责谁，把导出功能留到最后，已经算体面的收场。
所以想问你们一句，你上一次确认自己那份助记词还能正常导入，是什么时候的事？如果现在让你在半个月内把所有链上的委托解出来、换到一个新钱包，你有把握吗？🔴 Apparent demand has clearly improved but remains negative at -32,000 $BTC .
BTC started this new consolidation range in early June, when demand was estimated at -272,000 BTC.
This is a positive development, but not enough yet.
We saw this type of pattern in February and May 2026 before demand turned back down.
It could also be linked to the drop in average issuance, given that hashrate has declined, pointing to lower production.
#WeakConsumptionFedSplit #OpenAIAnthropicRace @OKX中文 $BTC After falling below 63,000, ETFs also begin to withdraw: What we really need to watch out for tonight is a "weekend fake breakout"
BTC has now fallen back below $63,000, while the US spot BTC ETF recorded a net outflow of about $131 million on August 13, showing a noticeable short-term cooling on the institutional side.
Tonight's biggest highlight was: Saturday.
US stocks, ETFs, and CME are all inactive with major institutional funds, and crypto alone is conducting price discovery, so the credibility of a weekend breakout is naturally reduced.
I would consider $62,000–$63,000 as the first observation zone. Bulls need to reclaim $63,000 and further challenge 64,000–64,500; Bears need to see 62,000 effectively broken below and the rebound failing to recover for further structural deterioration.
So the least cost-effective trade tonight was to use high leverage to guess directions in the middle of the range.
Adding a needle over the weekend does not necessarily mean trend confirmation. The signal truly worth adding is best when "price breakout + volume amplification + institutional funds return on Monday" resonate
#消费动能转弱, September policy remains constrained by inflation. #加密估值转向收入, how is BTC priced?