Orbit Post Sitemap
After a long period of stagnation, institutional funds have bought up the market over the past few days for a total of $1.9B! These buybacks occurred right before this explosive rally began They gave the market a little "push" in the right direction, so to speak It’s also worth noting that historically, whenever funds go quiet for a while and then suddenly start aggressively buying-driving prices up significantly-a sharp pullback usually follows shortly after as they begin locking in profit on t#BTC fluctuated after a surge, ETF funds continue to flow in
🔥BTC hit 79,500 and then dropped, but ETF money is still pouring in 💨
On Friday intraday, it once reached $79,500, up 23% for the week. Then it softened over the weekend—trading at $76,536 on Sunday, down 0.8% from 24 hours earlier. It just touched 79,000 in the morning and fell back to 76,000 by evening, a typical surge and shakeout.
But structurally, one thing hasn't changed—the money is still coming in.
Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $1.9 billion this week, the highest single-week record since October 2025. Weekly trading volume soared from $6.9 billion to $22.1 billion, a 219% surge. BlackRock's IBIT absorbed $503 million in a single day, totaling $1.33 billion this week alone.
💰 This rally is supported by three factors: the US Treasury doubling the scale of long-term bond buybacks, easing liquidity expectations; the White House crypto summit with Trump personally endorsing, improving regulatory outlook; and ETF funds net inflowing for five consecutive days, showing institutions are genuinely buying.
However, selling pressure above 75,000 is obvious, and 79,000 has become a key resistance level. The 4-hour RSI hit its highest level in over seven years before turning down, indicating short-term bullish momentum is fading.
📌 Friday's surge crushed the shorts, while this weekend's pullback shook the bulls. The direction hasn't changed, only the pace.
👇 Let's discuss in the comments: do you think this pullback is a buying opportunity or a signal of a local top?
$BTC $ETH #特朗普披露千笔证券交易，透明度受关注
"Trump Executes Over a Thousand Securities Trades in a Single Month, What Is the White House Operator Betting On?"
The U.S. Office of Government Ethics recently disclosed that Trump completed over 1,000 securities trades in June alone, with a transaction volume reaching $263 million, averaging nearly 50 high-frequency trades per day. This is not merely retail trading but an automated index rebalancing managed by an independent quantitative model.
Underlying holdings reveal that the White House quantitative account is aggressively selling technology ETFs while consolidating positions in high cash flow traditional financial defensive assets like Berkshire Hathaway and Visa. Retail investors focus on insider gossip, but seasoned investors see technology valuations peaking and taking profits. The technology growth allocation is accordingly reduced to below 30%, firmly setting the portfolio's stop-loss line below the S&P 5400 level. $BTC At present, there is still one more crash to come. Without a crash, the bull market simply cannot hold.
Jiang Zhuoer said 90% of the bear market is over, expecting a rebound between 67,000 and 72,000. I, Hu Wan'er, who has been active since 2017, don't see it that way.
This wave from 64,000 to 78,000 is superficially driven by the Ministry of Finance's repurchase easing + nearly 1 billion swept by ETFs in three days, but 82% is concentrated in IBIT alone + shorts squeezed out 2.7 billion causing a short squeeze. This kind of rally, propped up by a single-point ETF pulse and short covering, is not an endogenous bull market. The 4-hour RSI hit 93, daily 83; historically, after this signal, the median retracement over 12 weeks is 14.5%. Yesterday $XRP flash crashed 21% in minutes, with over 1.49 billion long orders dominating in 24 hours, liquidity thin, shorts squeezed then longs crushed, a manipulator’s sharp move twice.
At the 78,000 level, without a crash, the chips cannot be cleaned out, and the bull market cannot stand.
Someone asked, Wan'er, aren’t you afraid of being wrong with such certainty?
If this prediction is wrong, I will admit it.
My position is very stable: half in $OKB held firmly as a bottom, a bit in $BTC, and the rest all in cash. If the bull Jiang mentioned really comes, I will just earn less; if there is still one last crash as I said, I will put all that half cash in during the crash or around October.
More or less profit, that's all. People can never earn money beyond their own understanding. I just want to follow my heart and only trust myself.
There are no forever right gurus in crypto, the market only has profits and losses.
(PS: The above is all personal prediction, not investment advice, profits and losses at your own risk.)$BTC $ETH $DOGE
Current market status of btc: After a rebound, it is consolidating at a high level, surging close to $80,000 and then retreating under pressure. Now it is oscillating between the $76,000-$78,000 range, which is a shakeout phase after the positive news has been realized. The previous surge was mainly due to: Trump's crypto-friendly expectations + US Treasury repo expectations + shorts being forced to cover positions.
However, the positive factors remain but with uncertainties
• ETF has seen continuous capital inflow recently; institutions are indeed buying;
• The market is betting on the Senate passing crypto legislation in September, but the bill may not pass, and if it falls short of expectations, a sharp drop is likely;
• The US Treasury repo will officially launch on September 9, currently it is just speculative hype.
At the same time, there are very real risk points
• The fear and greed index has entered the greed zone, short-term sentiment is overheated, profit-taking could happen anytime;
• Both long and short leveraged positions are heavy, $80,000 is strong resistance on the upside, $73,000-$74,000 is key support on the downside, breaking either side will trigger a liquidation wave;
Be cautious of position risks
#BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入
#英伟达AI服务器或涨价超15%
#ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #BTC延续强势, can the flow of funds be sustained?
I'm Brother Dao. BTC broke through 77,500, up nearly 20% over three days. The ETF had a net inflow of $826 million in the previous trading day. Funds are spreading from early short closing to ETF and spot buying. This is a structural change, not just a simple short squeeze.
Market sentiment is also shifting rapidly. Cramer shifted from selling BTC at quantum computing risk to recommending buying directly; Schiff called the breakout above 72,000 a false breakout and advocated switching to gold. Two perpetually bearish investors gave completely opposite reactions, indicating that the buying sentiment has begun to spread.
CNBC host Cramer previously publicly sold BTC due to concerns about quantum computing risks, but recently he has advised investors to buy BTC directly, calling it a top-tier trading tool. Peter Schiff, who has long been bearish on Bitcoin, called the breakout above $72,000 a false breakout and advocated a shift toward gold. Two long-term bearish BTC investors gave completely opposite reactions. Market sentiment is shifting from caution to chasing gains, with divergences accelerating and converging—this is often a psychological trait of the mid to late stages of a trend.
Next, let's see if ETF funds can sustain profit-taking selling. If inflows continue, the short squeeze will shift to a trend correction. If inflows slow, profit-taking at high levels and re-leveraging will amplify volatility. The direction hasn't changed, but the rhythm is shifting. Brother Dao has finished talking, so take a closer look $BTC $ETH $DOGE Herding into bullish positions is itself the greatest risk.
Just as the last round of shakeout calmed down, FOMO sentiment surged back, and leveraged funds rushed in as if missing the move by a moment meant being left out. But the biggest hidden danger in the market now isn’t some negative news—it’s that long positions are too crowded. When everyone stands on the same side, the liquidation zone below acts like a magnet pulling the price down; shorts don’t even need to act, the leverage stampede can cause a sharp price drop on its own.
A few days ago shorts were being squeezed out, now longs are piling up—the script has quietly changed.
BTC is densely packed with retail limit long orders in the 75,000 to 76,000 range, which is the easiest spot for precise harvesting. Once there’s a quick dip, the late-entry longs get knocked out immediately. Whether the whales are absorbing the sell-off or just watching remains to be seen.
ETH remains the same—weak follow-through, unable to rally or crash deeply. But one detail is worth noting—last week ETH ETF net inflows hit $690 million, a 10-month high. Institutions are clearly adding positions against the trend, yet the price remains under pressure. This only indicates a leverage-level shakeout; fundamentals are fine, and the direction ultimately depends on BTC.
SOL appears resistant to decline on the surface but is actually bloated. The price is holding, but capital has dried up—ETF inflows have been zero for 5 consecutive days, and staked tokens aren’t truly locked. If BTC falters, SOL’s catch-up drop could be the harshest.
Now it’s not about who’s right, but who can manage their positions. Sharp price spikes can come anytime, so keep positions light, be patient for rotation, and don’t go all in.
$BTC $ETH
#BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入
#ETH触及2500美元后震荡 Recently, I bought some $HOME at a cost of around $0.00658.
I reviewed this project again, and what really interests me is its buyback mechanism. The current design of the DeFi app is to use 80% of the protocol's net fee income to buy back HOME, and the repurchased tokens go into the DAO Treasury. In other words, if the platform's trading volume and revenue continue to grow, HOME itself will continuously receive real buying pressure.
Additionally, HOME just launched on Korea's Upbit in early August, and the liquidity brought by the KRW trading pair is a relatively practical catalyst recently.
The price is still around $0.006 now, having dropped quite deeply before, so I'm actually willing to hold some here and wait for market rotation.
Of course, there is still ongoing unlocking ahead, which is a risk I will keep an eye on.
But at this position, the odds are acceptable to me, and I'll first see if it can return to $0.01.
$HOME After mocking Trump, a calm reflection shows that fiscal crises are often the source of wars
When a country's fiscal constraints become increasingly difficult to manage through normal economic and political means
It means the government is more likely to shift problem-solving methods from internal to external
Take the current United States, for example, the China-US competition, the competition for oil control, financial and economic sanctions, and also the multiple wars the US has launched in modern times
Therefore, Trump's so-called use of the US military to solve the US debt problem seems laughable but is actually sinister in intent! #特朗普披露千笔证券交易，透明度受关注 $LRCX is at a device re-evaluation node in the process window of switching to molybdenum material for 3D NAND above 300 layers, but the core divergence in current pricing lies between the progress of storage manufacturers' capital expenditures and the tightening of macro risk appetite.
Currently, mass production positioning in the storage industry is in the 2xx layer range, with Kioxia and SanDisk at 218 layers, Micron at 276 layers, Samsung reaching 286 layers, and only SK Hynix advancing to 321 layers. These layer positions indicate that the vast majority of manufacturers still have a gap before the mandatory adoption of molybdenum processes above 300 layers, and equipment procurement demand remains in a transition period.
In the transmission logic of driving factors, the physical push from technical rigid bottlenecks ranks first; the high resistance and leakage of traditional tungsten word lines limit deep stacking. The pressure to clear semiconductor equipment overvaluation from trading desk positions comes next, and the actual capital expenditure rhythm of storage manufacturers has the least impact.
The upside scenario is based on the assumption that SK Hynix's 321-layer mass production proceeds smoothly and that Micron and others accelerate follow-up. If orders for production lines above 300 layers are fulfilled ahead of schedule in the next two quarters, market expectations for demand elasticity for etching and deposition equipment will be raised, triggering a valuation recovery for $LRCX.
The downside scenario is triggered by storage giants cutting capital expenditures or delays in new material adoption. When macro inflation expectations rise and suppress overall risk appetite, high-valuation semiconductor equipment stocks lacking immediate order support are more prone to concentrated long position liquidations.
A failure signal to watch for is whether major manufacturers like Kioxia and Samsung experience large-scale delays in their expansion plans evolving from 2xx layers to 300 layers. If expansion nodes are postponed by more than one fiscal year, the incremental equipment procurement brought by material conversion will not offset the decline in traditional equipment orders.
Key observations in the next 7 days include the latest guidance changes from storage giants regarding capital expenditures on production lines above 300 layers, as well as the transmission path of macro risk appetite fluctuations on the position distribution in the semiconductor equipment sector.
#黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战 #特朗普披露千笔证券交易，透明度受关注$BTC $ETH $DOGE
Current market status of btc: After a rebound wave, it is oscillating at a high level, surging close to $80,000 and then retreating under pressure. Now it is grinding back and forth in the $76,000‑$78,000 range, which belongs to the consolidation phase after the positive news has been realized. The previous big surge was mainly due to: Trump's crypto-friendly expectations + US Treasury repo expectations + shorts being forced to cover positions.
However, the positive factors remain but with uncertainties
• ETF has seen continuous capital inflow recently, institutions are indeed buying;
• The market is betting on the Senate passing crypto legislation in September, but the bill may not pass, and if it falls short of expectations, a sharp drop is likely;
• The US Treasury repo will officially launch on September 9, currently it is just speculative hype.
At the same time, there are very real risk points
• The fear and greed index has entered the greed zone, short-term sentiment is overheated, profit-taking could happen anytime;
• Both long and short leveraged positions are heavy, $80,000 is strong resistance on the upside, $73,000‑$74,000 is key support on the downside, breaking either side will trigger a liquidation wave;
• Inflation data and Middle East conflicts could disrupt the rhythm at any time.
In summary
It is currently a news-driven high-level oscillation, not a one-sided bull run. The positive news has not been fully realized, but it has already risen a lot. Rapid surges and drops switch quickly, so a big rise tomorrow is not guaranteed.
#BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入 #ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #英伟达AI服务器或涨价超15% BTC will face several important macro pricing events continuously over the next month.
On August 26, the July core PCE and the second estimate of Q2 GDP will be released. If inflation is higher than expected, it will increase U.S. Treasury yields and put upward pressure on the dollar, which is unfavorable for BTC. The ideal scenario is inflation falling while the economy does not experience a significant slowdown.
From August 27 to 29, the Jackson Hole annual meeting will be held, with the theme "Financial Innovation: Impacts on Payments and Policy." The most noteworthy event is Warsh's speech on August 28, where the market will closely look for signals regarding inflation, employment, and the September policy adjustments.
After that, there are three key data releases:
September 4: August Nonfarm Payrolls
September 10: August PPI
September 11: August CPI
Nonfarm Payrolls determine how the market interprets employment and economic resilience, while PPI and CPI directly affect market judgments on inflation. Since these data are closer to the September FOMC, their impact on rate cut expectations may be greater than the GDP revisions.
Finally, the FOMC meeting on September 15-16 will announce the interest rate decision, economic forecasts, and the dot plot.
Therefore, the upcoming macro mainline is very clear:
PCE/GDP → Jackson Hole → Nonfarm Payrolls → PPI/CPI → FOMC
After each release, the focus will be on:
Rate cut expectations → U.S. Treasury yields/dollar → ETF funds → BTC price If I had to choose between $BTC or $ETH for the August 2026 recovery wave, in my view, BTC is suitable as a core asset, while ETH is better for those bros looking for higher growth potential.
In the 7 day time frame from around 16/08 to 23/08/2026, BTC rises about 21 to 22%, from the 62,800 to 64,500 dollar range up to around 76,500 to 77,000 dollars. ETH rises more strongly, about 26 to 28%, from the 1,870 to 1,910 dollar range up to around 2,380 to 2,420 dollars. During this period, ETH once surpassed the 2,500 dollar mark, while BTC touched close to 79,400 dollars at one point.
Looking at the performance, ETH clearly has a higher beta than BTC. When money flows back into the market, ETH often benefits more strongly due to its ecosystem narrative, DeFi, Stablecoin, RWA, and various Layer 2s.
However, we shouldn't rush to conclude that ETH has surpassed BTC just by looking at the 7-day gains.
BTC currently has a market cap of about 1.53 to 1.55 trillion dollars, dominance still around 56 to 59%, and a fixed supply of 21 million coins. Spot ETF inflows, companies buying BTC as a reserve asset, and massive liquidity make BTC the relatively safest haven in the Crypto market.
ETH is different. ETH's value is more closely tied to onchain activity. Ethereum is the major platform for DeFi, Stablecoin, real-world asset tokenization, and many Web3 applications. ETH holders can also earn additional staking yields of about 3 to 4% per year. But that comes with risks of competition from Solana, other Layer 1s, and the possibility of money rotating to hotter narratives.
The current ETH/BTC ratio is only about 0.0315, meaning 1 BTC can be exchanged for nearly 31.8 ETH. BTC dominance has also dropped from a peak of about 63% to 56 to 59%. This is a signal that money is starting to seek opportunities in ETH and altcoins, but not yet enough to claim that Altseason has begun.
This recovery wave has only lasted about a week so far, bros don't rush into FOMO. Ethereum is stronger in performance, but Bitcoin remains the asset that dictates the direction of the entire marketTHE SQUEEZE WAS THE BAIT. 👀
Bitcoin didn’t rally because everyone suddenly turned bullish.
Billions in short positions were forced out, pushing price higher while Open Interest dropped.
That tells a different story: this move was largely mechanical short covering — not fresh, broad-based demand.
Now comes the real test:
Can actual buyers step in and keep $BTC above $77K?
If the next leg comes with rising spot demand and Open Interest, that’s when the move gets interesting.
#DailyOrbit At the current stage, BTC has clearly broken through the ma200, a historically validated bull-bear dividing line. Typically, each cycle will retest the ma200 once, but the timing varies from 2 months to half a year. As long-term trend traders, we should focus on the next bull market cycle as a key trading opportunity not to be missed. Therefore, against this backdrop, I personally prefer to enter with half a position in spot and use a 90-day dollar-cost averaging strategy to dilute the risk of pullbacks. However, before a possible pullback, there are two different scenarios to handle: one is a pullback after the daily candle closes above 83000, and the other is a pullback without the daily candle closing above 83000.
Scenario One: Pullback to ma200 daily moving average after breaking above 83000
This is a double confirmation of a bull market, confirming both the ma200 breakout and the breaking of the bear market structure characterized by lower lows and lower highs. Based on this, 57700 is very likely the lowest point of this bear market cycle. In the event of a black swan, the probability of the price closing below 57700 is very low. Therefore, one can enter coin-margined contracts near the ma200, with a liquidation set below 57700.
Scenario Two: Pullback to ma200 daily moving average without breaking above 83000
This is a single confirmation of a bull market, meaning only the ma200 breakout is confirmed, but the structure has not truly shifted. The probability of a sustained bull run is lower than in the first scenario. Therefore, one can continue to enter spot positions at the ma200, significantly reducing the weight of coin-margined contracts. If entering coin-margined contracts, the liquidation should be controlled below 35000 to avoid any possible adverse situations. 🗞 Bagel On-Chain Weekly Report (91): The Largest Short Squeeze in History
After nearly 2 months of narrow fluctuations combined with the massive accumulation shown by URPD, the market finally saw an expected breakout this week. BTC surged over 16,000 points in just four days, triggering the largest short squeeze event in crypto history.
As usual, this week's report starts from the perspective of URPD to share the latest chip distribution status with everyone 👇:
As shown in the attached chart, the key highlights are:
🔺 Around 2.2 million BTC are currently accumulated in the 61~65K range, down 272,000 BTC from last week
🔺 Compared to the scale of the massive accumulation zone, the current profit-taking is not significant
🔺 The single large accumulation bar at 63K still holds over 1 million BTC
🔺 From the overall URPD chip distribution structure, 61~65K still provides a solid bottom foundation
This sudden surge this week finally released the "pent-up frustration" BTC had been holding back for a long time. At the same time, this fast, fierce, and precise rally also caused the largest short squeeze event in crypto history.
Going forward, as long as there is no obvious sell-off behavior from the chips accumulated in the 61~65K massive accumulation zone, we basically do not need to worry about a crash caused by a collapse in chip structure.
In the future, if BTC can gradually shift the center of gravity of the accumulation in the 61~65K massive accumulation zone upward during the rise, we might welcome a healthy bull market, just like in previous cycles.
Finally, a heads-up:
Tomorrow I will release a post sharing the upcoming BTC cycle trading plan, expected to be presented in a "long-form" style, explaining every detail as much as possible. Please look forward to it, and I hope everyone can provide plenty of feedback.
That's all for today. Wishing everyone a pleasant weekend 🧼 BTC is surging so aggressively, but the derivatives market is quietly telling another story. Have you noticed that everyone has been calling for the bull market to return, but there are actually fewer people making money than last month? I've been browsing on-chain data these past two days and saw some rather subtle signals. Spot ETFs are indeed attracting funds. On August 20, BTC ETFs saw a net inflow of about $600 million, and ETH added another $220 million. Institutional entry is quite sincere. BTC jumped 23% in a week, approaching the 80,000 mark, which on the surface seems like a renewed enthusiasm. But digging deeper, the funding rate and option skew derivatives haven't excited along with the price. - Although the funding rate for perpetual contracts has turned positive, it is still far from the overheated zone, indicating that leveraged funds are still in a "test" rather than a "sprint" state - the 25% delta skew in the options market still leans toward bearish protection, meaning professional funds buy insurance during the rise rather than chasing the trend nakedly - futures open interest has moderately increased without extreme accumulation; the market feels more like repricing rather than emotional loss of control. This makes me feel that the core driving force behind this rally is not retail FOMO, but spot buying holding the bottom at the bottom. Continuous ETF inflows have pushed prices up, but the derivatives market has not fully caught up yet, which is actually quite interesting. It means two things. First, if BTC can stabilize within the 77K to 80K range, the derivatives structure will gradually revise#BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入 Capital adjusted investment integration in June Sold some stocks Bought Fis (Fidelity National Information Services) HD (Home Depot) BRK.B CIATS visa MA Capital positioned in advance, misleading late information! 비트코인은 여전히 시장의 유동성 앵커다. 그러나 가격 상승 자체보다 중요한 것은 이 움직임이 어디서 오는지다. 이미 가격에 반영된 부분과 아직 반영되지 않은 변수를 먼저 나누면, 현재 $77K 이상의 강세는 매수세 회귀라는 사실 자체보다는 그 구성에 더 주목할 필요가 있다. 숏 스퀴즈성 랠리라면 펀딩과 선물 미결제약정이 급등하며 빠른 소진 패턴을 보이지만, 현물 거래량과 ETF 유입이 동반 개선되는 흐름이라면 이는 포지션 청산이 아닌 신규 자금 유입일 가능성이 크다. 이 차이는 후속 랠리의 지속성을 가르는 핵심 변수다. 시장 구조를 보면, BTC가 강세를 유지하는 동안 자금은 위험선호 회복 경로를 따라 ETH와 고베타 알트코인으로 순차적으로 이동한다. 반대로 BTC가 횡보로 전환하면 시장은 두 갈래로 나뉜다. 하나는 차익실현 후 재진입을 기다리는 관망이고, 다른 하나는 상대적으로 저평가된 알트코인으로의 회전이다. 즉 BTC의 방향성은 단순히 한 자산의 등락이 아니라 전체 크립토 자산Just saw some XRP data, and I really didn't expect it.
XRP can obviously be traded 24 hours a day.
But now about 23% of on-chain trading volume
is concentrated in the three hours when London afternoon and New York morning overlap.
It was only about 14% a year ago.
The coin never stops trading 24/7.
Yet the traders are acting more and more like they're working a 9-to-5 😂
At least from this data, XRP's trading rhythm is definitely starting to feel more like "traditional financial hours" now.
$XRP#英伟达AI服务器或涨价超15% $NVDA Nvidia will release its quarterly earnings report ending July next week. Based on the pace of past quarters, the market is no longer unfamiliar with "earnings beating expectations and upward guidance." What truly determines stock price elasticity are three longer-term issues: whether Rubin can smoothly take over Blackwell, whether AI demand still significantly exceeds supply, and how much financing and balance sheet responsibility Nvidia must bear to lock in future demand. From brokerage expectations, fundamentals remain strong. According to Chasing Wind Trading Desk, Jefferies released a forward-looking report this week, expecting Nvidia's July quarterly revenue to reach $95 billion, higher than the market consensus of about $91.9 billion; Revenue guidance for the October quarter is expected to reach $108 billion, also higher than the market expectation of about $103.7 billion. Morgan Stanley's report is relatively conservative, expecting July quarterly revenue of about $91.2 billion and October quarter revenue of about $102.3 billion, but it also believes the recent trend will continue, with quarterly revenue likely to continue increasing quarterly by about $10 billion. In other words, the core of the current market debate is whether, after delivering good results, the growth curve for 2027 and 2028 can continue to be revised upward. Blackwell remains strong, Rubin is the next round of valuation narrative. In the short term, demand for Blackwell remains strong. Microsoft and Amazon Web Services showed more significant improvements during the quarter, while companies like OpenAI and SpaceX have long-term focus on computing powerBe the coolest guy, drink the strongest liquor, chase the wildest girls, buy the most aggressive coins
The market has been really fierce these days
Who ran the wildest in this round?
The answer must be ZEC
In June, it was treated by the market as a "zero coin" around $250, now it has directly surged above $800, reaching a high of $855
It once rose more than 20% in the past 24 hours, and increased over 30% in the past week, hitting a new high since 2018
Why is it specifically this one?
I think there are three reasons combined:
First, the overall market is rising, and ZEC was the first to capture the market's risk appetite
Second, the privacy narrative has been reignited
Grayscale is advancing the Zcash ETF, and the latest amended filing has further clarified product names, fees, and other details. There is even a plan discussed by a DCG subsidiary to buy up to 200,000 ZEC
Third, and the most powerful layer:
Leverage is starting to take over the market
ZEC futures trading volume reached about $9.5 billion in the past 24 hours, while spot volume was only about $1.06 billion, with open interest close to $1.8 billion
So now ZEC is not just being bought
It's spot narrative + ETF expectations + leveraged funds + breaking historical resistance all pushing it upward
This is also why it can run much faster than BTC and ETH
But the question arises: Is $800 really a new starting point, or the last frenzy?
$ZEC BlockBeats News, August 23. Analyst qinbafrank published an article interpreting the latest agreement between NVIDIA and Poolside: NVIDIA paid $6 billion to obtain a non-exclusive license for Poolside's "Model Factory" technology, which is the core software system of Poolside's open-source coded Laguna series. Meanwhile, NVIDIA has invited over 100 Poolside engineers to join its project focused on the Nemotron open-source weight model project. Since its launch in 2023, the project has been developing larger and more advanced versions, rumored to have a parameter scale of several trillion dollars, with about $1 billion invested in equity. This analyst believes this marks a milestone move for Nvidia to shift from selling shovels to gold mining. Huang took this opportunity to delve deep into the model layer and build a full-stack "AI factory" deeply integrated into the NVIDIA ecosystem. Analysts summarized four key points: First, NVIDIA aims to rebuild one of the world's strongest open-source weighting models, benchmarking against Chinese open-source models, while directly challenging leading US closed-source companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Open-source weighting models have lower operating costs and offer greater customization. Second, from selling GPU hardware to software and model layers, NVIDIA is strengthening its control over both upstream and downstream processes. Third, while strengthening the moat,Stablecoin hiện chiếm khoảng $302B, tương đương hơn 13% tổng vốn hóa crypto theo CoinGecko. Đây là con số mà tôi cho rằng nhiều trader đang đánh giá quá thấp. Stablecoin không chỉ là: “Bán BTC xong giữ USDT.” Nó đang dần trở thành: USD chạy trên blockchain 24/7. Thanh toán xuyên biên giới. Settlement. Remittance. DeFi collateral. Treasury-backed digital cash. Institutional settlement. Reuters dẫn nghiên cứu của Citi và Brookfield cho rằng lượng stablecoin lưu hành có thể tăng mạnh đến cuối thập #BTC surges then fluctuates, ETF funds continue to flow in
BTC surged to 78800 then fell back to 77000, who is actually buying at this level?
Last night BTC briefly pushed above $78800, but failed to hold and slid back to around $77000, fluctuating back and forth. Many watching the market feel conflicted—chasing highs risks being stuck, pullbacks risk catching a falling knife; this kind of volatility is actually more exhausting than a clear up or down trend.
But this round feels different from previous rebounds, mainly due to the capital flow. Last week, the combined net inflow into US spot BTC and ETH ETFs was nearly $2.6 billion, the strongest single-week figure since October last year. Of that, spot BTC ETFs took in about $1.9 billion, and ETH ETFs added nearly $700 million. This scale is not small; at least it shows this rally isn’t purely driven by short covering, there is real money buying on the spot side.
The question is what happens next. Whether ETF funds can withstand profit-taking pressure at these highs is the watershed for whether the market can shift from volatile highs to a stable trend. Once inflows slow down, the fast gains earlier will be quickly given back, and leveraged positions will likely amplify volatility. Friends using leverage these days should be cautious.
I personally don’t take ETF inflows as a guarantee; they are indeed a solid support for this rebound, but if sentiment weakens, inflows can reverse quickly. Compared to the high of 78800, whether 77000 can hold might be the more important level to watch in the coming days.
$BTC $ETH 📊 Crypto Market on August 23: Is This a Rebound or a Reversal?
Macro Perspective: Recently, the U.S. Treasury has expanded long-term Treasury repurchases, causing the dollar to weaken and inflation expectations to be repriced. Scarce assets like BTC and gold have clearly benefited; however, long-term Treasury yields remain relatively high. The market will continue to watch for policy signals from Jackson Hole, so the macro environment is marginally improving, but risks have not been fully eliminated.
Capital Perspective: This is currently the most noteworthy aspect. The U.S. spot BTC ETF has recently seen continuous capital inflows, totaling about $1.92 billion over the past five trading days, indicating that this rally is not solely driven by contract funds; institutional spot funds are indeed re-entering the market. Meanwhile, from August 19 to 21, approximately $1.44 billion in short positions were liquidated, showing a clear short squeeze effect accompanying the rise. (KuCoin)
Market Structure: BTC rapidly surged from previous lows this week, once approaching $80,000, but after the spike, it experienced significant volatility, indicating that the $80,000 area has become a battleground between bulls and bears. (CryptoSlate)
Sentiment Perspective: The market has quickly shifted from panic to optimism, with shorts being continuously squeezed. However, after such a rapid sentiment recovery, the risk of chasing longs is also increasing.
#BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入
Candlesticks and Bull-Bear Dynamics: My current view remains bullish but without chasing the rally; I also avoid topping out to short when the trend is strong. A more comfortable approach is to wait for BTC to retest the previous breakout zone, see if it can stabilize on lower volume, and then consider following the trend to go long.
As for whether this is a rebound or a reversal—I prefer to define it as: a strong rebound is attempting to transition into a trend reversal, but confirmation is still needed.
If BTC later retests without breaking key support, ETF net inflows continue, and it breaks above previous highs with increased volume again, the credibility of a reversal will grow; conversely, if ETF outflows resume and BTC falls back into the breakout zone with high volume, then this rally looks more like a large-scale rebound driven by capital inflows plus short squeezes.
So at this stage: bulls have the advantage, but the real opportunity may not be chasing the breakout, but waiting for a second confirmation after the pullback. Did anyone notice a strikingly contrasting detail this week?
The yield on the US 30-year Treasury surged to 5.27%, hitting a new high since 2007. Although the US Treasury urgently doubled the scale of bond buybacks to stabilize the market, the market simply didn’t buy it, and the interest rate stubbornly remained at a high level.
Logically, such a high risk-free yield should exert huge sucking pressure on risk assets like Bitcoin $BTC. But amazingly, Bitcoin actually surged more than 20% against the trend this week!
This is the core highlight: to rise so sharply under such huge macro pressure, if interest rates really come down in the future, wouldn’t it just take off from here?
Of course, high interest rates still hang like the sword of Damocles overhead. Going forward, besides closely watching Bitcoin $BTC’s K-line, the movements of the US bond market must also be closely monitored. #BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入 #美财政部扩大长债回购，30年美债高位回落 On the evening of August 23, the weekly close was made. The real change this week was not a single big bullish candle, but the return of both price and volume together.
Around 19:32, OKX reported BTC at $77,238, ETH at $2,430, and SOL at $94.51; compared to around midnight on August 16, these three rose approximately 22.4%, 28.9%, and 25.1% this week. CoinGecko's 7-day gains for the same period were 22.0%, 28.5%, and 24.4%, showing consistent direction. ETH led, but the gap was not large, more like a broad risk appetite recovery rather than a solo rally of a single coin.
The volume was not hollow either. According to DeFiLlama's full-day data from August 16 to 22, total chain-wide DEX volume was about $62.7 billion, compared to about $37.5 billion in the previous seven days, an increase of about 67%; OKX and Binance's top three crypto spot weekly volumes also clearly expanded. However, BTC touched $79,516 and ETH reached $2,547 this week before both retreated, indicating supply at high levels has appeared.
If next week BTC fails to hold $75,500, ETH falls below $2,350, and volume shrinks rapidly, expectations for this recovery should be lowered. Do you think this is a trend restart or a high-level rotation after a sharp rise? Next week, will you first watch for price support or whether volume can remain strong? #BTC #ETH #MarketWeeklyReportPullback After Surge: Profit Taking and Geopolitical Risks
This week's surge in Bitcoin was mainly driven by three converging forces: the U.S. Treasury expanding Treasury repo operations to release liquidity, Trump's meeting with crypto industry executives signaling regulatory optimism, and the largest short squeeze in history — with total market liquidations reaching $4.5 billion over the past three days, including nearly $2.5 billion in Bitcoin short liquidations.
However, the weekend decline was just as rapid:
· Concentrated profit-taking: Bitcoin soared from $62,900 to $79,500, a 26% increase in 5 days, with severe short-term overbought conditions and strong willingness to realize gains.
· Renewed geopolitical risks: The Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council issued a new warning, stating that countries participating in economic restrictions will be considered enemies, fueling risk-off sentiment and causing a collective plunge in the crypto market. $BTC $ETH $DOGE #BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入 In 1977, NASA launched the Voyager 1 probe. Its onboard computer had only 72KB of memory, with computing power less than that of an electronic door lock you might have today. But 48 years later, in 2025, it is still operating normally in interstellar space 24 billion kilometers from Earth — the farthest human-made object ever flown, relying not on "speed" but on being "slow enough, stable enough, and precise enough." Every time I see Ethereum mocked for "slow block times," "expensive Gas," or "slow upgrades," I think of Voyager 1. In an era when all public chains compete on speed, Ethereum deliberately chooses to be slow. And this choice might just be its most dangerous quality. All chains compete on speed, only Ethereum competes on "not crashing." The public chain competition in 2025 has become suffocating. Solana claims sub-second confirmations, Monad and MegaETH put "millions of TPS" right on their PPT front pages. And Ethereum? It produces a block every 12 seconds, with final confirmation taking over ten minutes. Sounds like a joke. But Solana has crashed at least eight times in the past three years, with the longest downtime nearly 20 hours. Some of those new chains claiming millions of TPS have seen their ecosystems shrink within less than a year of launch. EOS raised $4 billion, touted as the "Ethereum killer," but now its ecosystem has shrunk to near oblivion. Terra once surged into the top three by market cap with a 20% annualized algorithmic stablecoin, then went to zero within 72 hours, evaporating $40 billion. FTT built a financial empire on high-frequency trading narratives, only to vanish in three days. Ethereum一、整体市场核心结论（重中之重） 1、当前属于BTC冲高带动的局部题材牛市，而非全面山寨季。 2、全网合约未平仓持续高位，杠杆堆积严重，多空双向爆仓风险并存。 3、行情极端分化：ZEC、HYPE走强妖币趋势，TRUMP、PUMP纯情绪收割，ENA稳健避险。 4、所有山寨的生死线：BTC 73534 不破，题材继续轮动；跌破全部集体退潮。 二、五大赛道币种单独数据+强弱定性 1、$TRUMP（政治MEME） - 当前价格：2.47$，24H跌幅 -8.39% - 盘面特征：高位大幅回撤、波动率爆表，24小时高低点波动超 90% - 资金结构：纯消息面驱动，无任何基本面，合约短线资金快进快出 - 强弱定性：短期偏空、高位兑现明显 - 风险点：利好落地即砸盘，属于典型“买预期卖事实”，只能极致超短线，不适合持仓过夜。 2、$PUMP（MEME赛道核心） - 当前价格：0.00517$ - 盘面特征：24小时成交额持续爆炸，换手率极高 - 资金结构：纯游资接力、零机构持仓、全散户博弈 - 强弱定性：中性偏震荡，无趋势，纯情绪脉冲 - 风险点：热度退潮后流动性瞬间枯竭，一Let me say something that might backfire: I personally think this bear market is basically over, and this time ETH is very likely to outperform BTC.
First, let me talk about my own foolish mistake. When ETH was in the 1700 to 1900 range, I accidentally sold it, but it kept surging without looking back. This week it shot up directly to 2400, with a weekly gain of 27%,
which is even stronger than BTC's 21%.
I really couldn't stand the pain of missing out, so I quickly bought back at 2100 to stop my losses. This is a typical case of "selling at the bottom and chasing halfway up," and I lost all face.
Now ETH is over 2400, I sold half of my spot holdings, betting it can touch the 2500 peak. My stop loss is set at 2550; if it breaks through, I'll figure out a way to recover.
As for BTC, I also have a plan: BTC just rose from 63,000 to 76,000. If it pulls back to the 67,000 to 72,000 range, I'll put all my bullets in.
If it just doesn't look back, then I'll accept it.
Regarding SOL, I have one principle now: don't guess blindly if you can't be sure.
This is my subjective judgment, not something set in stone. Looking at last week, BTC and ETH ETFs just absorbed $2.6 billion, shorts were liquidated for tens of billions last week, and this week longs chasing the rally were swept for over $800 million. The market really punishes all kinds of disobedience!
#BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入 This wave is not a "confirmed reversal," but a triple play of macro triggers + short squeeze aftershocks + localized accumulation. Whether it turns into a reversal depends on whether the pullback shows respect.
BTC surged from 64,000 with a single bullish candle to 79,500 (8/21 high), ETH pulled back over 2400. On the surface, it looks like a bull rebound, but breaking it down: the 30-year US Treasury yield dropped from 5.34% to 5.19%, easing the denominator; the White House crypto summit + FOMC minutes anchored sentiment; 24h short positions exploded by over 3 billion, and Hyperliquid saw a single order evaporate 48.8 million — at least half of the rise is short covering and forced liquidations, not continuous real money accumulation in spot.
ETF net inflow of 1.1 billion over two days is a baton pass, not ignition.
Can you enter the market? Yes, but only at two positions:
• On a pullback, BTC 74,000–76,000 / ETH 2300–2350 with volume contraction and stabilization, enter light long positions with stop loss set 2% below;
• Or on a solid volume close breaking BTC 80,000 / ETH 2500, with volume ≥ 1.5 times the average of the previous 5 days, follow the tail and right side.
Currently, the daily RSI is 82, overbought; a giant whale transferred and sold 7,700 BTC over 3 days; DOGE-like altcoins saw whales offload 0.0835 — chasing this bullish candle means handing a reverse exit ticket to those who cut losses at 64,000.
The real reversal script is: rally → pullback without breaking previous high support → volume contraction and sideways → then rise with volume.Why has ETH outperformed BTC? ETF capital flows have already provided the answer.
Jiang Zhuoer, founder of the Litecoin mining pool, recently stated that the current round of ETH's price increase surpassing BTC is not accidental, but rather a result of changing capital flows.
Data shows that last week, BTC spot ETFs had a net inflow of about $1.92 billion, while ETH spot ETFs had a net inflow of about $700 million.
On the surface, ETH's capital attraction scale is less than BTC's, but when combined with market capitalization, the gap is narrowing:
Currently, ETH's total market cap is about 18.8% of BTC's, but ETF capital inflows have reached 36.4% of BTC's inflow scale.
In other words, calculated by market cap ratio, the new capital pressure ETH receives is about twice that of BTC.
This is one of the key reasons why ETH's recent maximum increase reached 35.9%, exceeding BTC's approximately 26.6%.
But the greater potential may come from the future on-chain financial assets.
As the regulatory environment in the United States gradually aligns with blockchain, if related policies like the CLARITY Act advance, traditional financial assets such as the US dollar, US stocks, and US bonds may further move towards tokenization and on-chain representation, with transactions and management completed through smart contracts.
This means that RWA (Real World Assets) could become an important bridge connecting traditional finance and the blockchain world.
And when large financial institutions truly begin to study on-chain assets, their focus may not be on a single token, but on the underlying public chains that support the operation of the entire financial infrastructure.The current surge method, look carefully before taking action: BTC surged sharply from 64,000 to 77,000–79,000 (touched 79,500 on 8/21), ETH rose nearly 30% weekly to over 2400, but on 8/23 it retreated from the high, with 24h long liquidations accounting for over 80% (880 million USD across the network).
The main drivers of this wave are the Treasury's balance sheet expansion + White House summit expectations + short covering ($3 billion short positions forcibly closed), while ETF net inflows of about 1.1 billion over two days are just taking over, not igniting the rally.
It's not that you can't enter the market, but you absolutely must not chase the bullish candles. Confirmation of a reversal requires three conditions: ① a pullback to 74,000–76,000/BTC or 2300–2350/ETH with volume contraction and stabilization; ② when rising again, spot volume ≥ 1.5 times the average volume of the previous 5 days; ③ ETF net inflows continuously for 3 consecutive days without interruption. Missing any one means a forced short squeeze tail wave.
Currently, the daily RSI is 82, indicating overbought; a giant whale sold 7,700 BTC in 3 days; chasing highs means taking over trapped positions. Wait for a pullback to catch, or a volume breakout above 80,000 to follow the right side; anything in between is just itchy hands tax.Since the official approval of the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the underlying logic of the crypto market has undergone an irreversible shift: Bitcoin is accelerating its evolution from a "risk asset for retail and geeks" to a "standard on the balance sheets of global institutions." A recent set of market data fully reflects this structural change—listed companies and U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have cumulatively purchased 1.55 million BTC, while the total new supply across the network during the same period was only about 455,000. This means that the purchase volume in the compliance channel has reached 3.6 times the new supply during the same period. Why is this "3.6 times" crucial? Rigid supply faces exponential demand: Bitcoin's output mechanism is strictly locked by code, and each halving compresses the supply of new coins. As Wall Street ETFs and whale-listed companies consume chips at rates several times faster than miners' output, liquidity on the market is being rapidly drained. Self-reinforcement of the capital matrix: Besides traditional asset management giants, more and more US-listed companies are incorporating BTC as core corporate reserves. This flywheel effect of "directly exchanging US capital market credit for Bitcoin" has completely broken institutional purchasing power beyond the limitations of traditional retail capital. The previous surges and crashes driven solely by retail investor sentiment and high leverage are gradually being hedged by the "lock-up effect" of institutional long-term allocation. When a steady stream of external dollars flows into a pool with a steady total volume and increasingly dwindling liquidity, market expectations for the big cycle will be completely reshaped本周AI板块的行情其实很好总结：存储类股几乎没怎么跌，光模块遭遇重挫，而$NVDA在财报发布前持续降温。📉 $NVDA本周下跌4.2%，资金明显在财报前提前撤退。8月26日公司将公布业绩，这份报告将直接决定下周整个AI板块的市场情绪走向，可以说是全市场瞩目的焦点。 存储板块表现相对抗跌：$SNDK本周下跌2.7%，周一冲高后逐步回落；$MU微跌0.4%，几乎持平；$SKHY下跌0.3%，周中一度跌幅较大，但在传出回购并注销4万亿韩元的消息后成功收复部分失地。 反观光模块则疲软得多。$LITE本周大跌6.2%，$AAOI更是重挫17.5%。此前涨幅过快，本周资金明显在获利了结。更糟的是，AAOI在周五盘后宣布拟增发至多6亿美元的ATM（按市价增发）计划，进一步打击了市场情绪。 所以本周最值得关注的不是谁跌得多，而是一个关键信号：存储板块的抗跌能力明显强于光模块。这说明资金在AI内部正在分化，对估值更高的光模块开始谨慎，而更青睐基本面支撑更强的存储领域。 下周的核心变量就是NVDA财报。如果数据足够强劲，AI行情大概率将继续演绎；若不及预期，高位的相关个股恐怕还要再经历一轮洗盘。市场正在2026年8月19日，宇树科技登陆上海科创板，上市首日股价一度上涨超过600%。 这场资本狂欢背后，市场真正押注的东西并非机器人会跳舞、打拳或后空翻。投资者期待的是一种全新的劳动力商品：能够走进人类已经建好的工厂，使用人类的工具，在不重新改造整条生产线的情况下，承担搬运、装配、质检与危险作业。 宇树2025年交付超过5500台人形机器人，收入从2023年的约1.59亿元增加到2025年的约17亿元。公司此次募资约61亿元，将资金投入机器人模型、本体研发、新产品和制造基地。宇树上市与经营资料 机器人行业终于获得了一个可以被资本市场直接定价的样本。 为什么工厂需要“长得像人”的机器人 工业机器人已经存在几十年。 从汽车焊接到晶圆搬运，机械臂早已是现代制造业的一部分。但传统机械臂通常被固定在围栏内，每一台负责少数重复动作。生产线改变后，企业往往需要重新编程、安装夹具甚至改造厂房。 人形机器人的商业逻辑来自另一个方向：全世界的工厂、仓库和工具，原本就是按照人的身高、手臂长度和行动方式设计。 如果机器人拥有双手、视觉系统和接近人类的活动范围，它就有机会直接进入现有环境。企业购买的不再是一台只$TRUMP experiences short-term pulse-like surges, and most positive news releases are basically opportunities to sell. It’s different from ZEC, which at least has a more complete narrative; TRUMP basically just waits for events to hype it up.
Short-term market characteristics: usually consolidates sideways, but once there’s news, it quickly spikes; when the news is officially released, big holders immediately dump and run, a typical case of buying the expectation and selling the reality.
Another key point: the tokens are highly concentrated, with related parties holding most of the tokens, who can sell large amounts and crash the price at any time. Once liquidity worsens, the decline will be fast and deep.
Two scenarios:
1. Rumors of positive events or crypto-friendly policies cause a quick short-term rebound;
2. Rumors of SEC investigations, political accountability, or exchange risk control restrictions cause an immediate sharp drop.
This kind of coin is only suitable for quick in-and-out trading to speculate on news; holding it passively can easily lead to being trapped.LIQUIDITY: $BTC Bitcoin jumped nearly 25% as long-term yields fell.
Treasury doubled long-bond buybacks to $4B per operation, while the 30-year yield dropped from 5.34% to 5.19%.
Lower yields helped fuel the crypto rally.First, a key premise: this ZEC rally is not just driven by BTC alone; it has independent catalysts.
What you said about BTC's violent upward move and greater elasticity in small-cap coins is the core booster, but from 500 to 860 in three to four days, plus a direct positive factor: Grayscale officially submitted an application to the SEC on 8/21 to convert the ZEC trust into a spot ETF. This is the main storyline behind this round of privacy coin independent speculation, not just a random broad altcoin rally.
This is also the core reason why it has surged more fiercely and with greater uncertainty than most copycat alts.
1. At the current 800 level, can you short directly? It is highly not recommended to open a heavy position short now.
Your intuition is correct: a 70%+ rise in 3 days, severe overbought conditions, and no incremental positive news make a big pullback very likely. Waiting for bulls to slowly unload and turnover to exhaust before shorting is actually the right approach.
But opening shorts immediately now carries very high risk, with several big pitfalls:
1. The narrative is not yet fully realized (ETF is still in submission stage, funds are still playing the approval expectation game). Before the altcoin hype cools down, thin liquidity can easily trigger another spike and wick, specifically to trap high-level shorts;
2. Contract open interest and volume have surged recently, funding rates are very likely paid by longs, so shorts pay daily funding fees, making the time cost very high;
3. Small market cap and high volatility mean if it really rallies to 900+, low tolerance for error, it can easily liquidate shorts first before dropping, exactly matching your concern of "fearing Monday won't drop but continue to surge";
4. If BTC continues to stay strong, with strong beta alt rotation, shorting alts against the trend is the easiest way to lose big money in futures.
2. If you must short, follow your own advice to "wait a bit longer, wait for weakening signals," and act only after these confirmations:
Wait for the bull unloading phase, not blind peak shorting:
✅ Volume surge to 860 new high fails, second attempt to rally is weak, highs gradually lower
✅ BTC no longer strong sideways or turns to correction, losing large-cap beta cover
✅ High funding rates fall, open interest stops increasing and starts declining, spot volume expands but price stagnates
✅ Break below first support 740-750, confirming short-term funds fleeing, then enter shorts in batches
• Trial short positions: prioritize light positions on rebounds under pressure in the 820-850 range, do not gamble mid-800s now
• Hard stop loss above previous highs 870/880, absolutely no no-stop-loss holding
• Position size: very small, very low leverage, never heavy positions; shorting alts is the highest risk direction
• What you want—"let bulls slowly unload before a big drop"—essentially means waiting for a second failed rally plus volume breakdown; this phase has a comfortable risk/reward ratio;
• Conversely, if it holds above 860 and makes new highs, abandon short ideas immediately, indicating ETF narrative funds will continue to play.
3. Two possible market outcomes:
1. Best short scenario: high-level sideways consolidation with bulls unloading in batches → failed rally and breakdown, then a rapid 20%-30% pullback, which is the move you expect;
2. Worst short scenario: Monday sees BTC liquidity return triggering a short squeeze rally to new highs, wiping out all short sellers, then a pullback later; this is the most common pattern for small-cap narrative coins.
4. Returning to your last sentence, I strongly agree:
In a bull market, prioritize following BTC's main trend and going long mainstream/strong beta correlated coins (like ETH/SOL), which have much better certainty and profits than counter-trend high-level shorting of surging alts.
Short-term pulses in alts can be traded long with momentum, but shorting at highs is a typical low-win-rate, high-risk trade, only suitable for small position speculation, not as a main strategy.
Summary
• The rise = BTC market driving + Grayscale ETF new narrative dual drivers, not just a pure no-news follow-up rally;
• Shorting directly at 800 now has poor risk/reward, easily trapped by a spike; your judgment to "wait and consider adding shorts after weakness" is correct;
• If shorting: wait for a high-level stagnation or break below 740 support, use small positions, and set stop loss above previous highs; cut losses if new highs form;
• Priority: currently go long mainstream BTC-correlated assets >> high-level speculative alt shorting.
Trader GouZongETH has surged more aggressively than BTC in this round, and today it has also dropped more sharply. Why?
The market collectively plunged over the weekend, with 179,200 people liquidated, and long positions accounting for 80%. BTC fell from 79,000 to 76,600, a drop of about 2%; ETH dropped from 2450 to 2390, a decline of over 4%—a sharper drop than BTC, but ETH’s gains in this round were stronger: rising 29% from 1900 to 2450, while BTC rose 24% from 64,100 to 79,500.
ETH’s outperformance relies on independent catalysts.
The Glamsterdam upgrade testnet was activated on August 20, marking the largest fundamental restructuring of Ethereum since The Merge: introducing ePBS proposer-builder separation, gas repricing, and parallel execution to enhance L1 processing capacity. Although the mainnet launch has been postponed to Q4, expectations have already started to be priced in.
Risks are also evident: the upgrade may cause some wallets and gas tools to malfunction; the mainnet date is undecided; and the short-term sharp rise has created significant profit-taking pressure. The fact that ETH is dropping more sharply than BTC today signals loosening of high-level positions.
The ETH/BTC exchange rate has clearly strengthened in this round, with funds rotating from BTC to ETH. Whether this rotation can continue depends on the upgrade rollout pace and whether ETF funds follow suit.
Do you think ETH is running an independent rally, or just catching up with BTC? Share your thoughts in the comments. Tomorrow we will track ETF flows to stay informed.
$ETH $BTC
#BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入
The above is market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice.Bitcoin is close to 80,000, what about altcoins?
Looking through the data, 40% of altcoins are near their historical lows. Bitcoin's market dominance is 58%, hitting a new high in recent years.
This data used to only appear during deep bear markets.
It's not a coincidence; it's a structural change.
In the past, capital flow had a fixed path: after $BTC rises, funds flow to $ETH, then after ETH rises, they flow to smaller coins, pushing them up in rotation. This logic relies on two premises: capital can only flow within crypto, and retail investors have enough purchasing power.
Now, both premises have loosened.
After ETFs came in, institutions buying BTC no longer need to go through altcoins. Traditional funds enter directly through the ETF channel, buy BTC, and stop there without flowing out.
On the US stock side, the seven giants like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft have absorbed a large amount of risk capital. Retail investors only have so much money; if they give it to tech stocks, they can't give it to altcoins.
The water is still the same, but the pipeline has changed.
The result is: Bitcoin is running an independent rally, while altcoins are in an independent bear market.
Understanding this point makes it clear—
You can no longer hold "waiting for altcoin season" as a belief.
The pipeline has changed, so the water won't flow the old way anymore. $ZEC Maybe the dog dealer is riding the ETF trend and dumping its holdings on you. Why is it rising? First, Grayscale is indeed causing trouble. Grayscale has submitted its fifth amendment to the Zcash Trust-to-ETF proposal, and its parent company plans to inject $110 million into it. The market is betting on the ETF launch, with funds entering early to boost the market. Second, institutions are accumulating shares. There are reports that some institutions have set up mining machine clusters, controlling nearly one-fifth of the network's computing power, locking the mined coins onto their balance sheets. Plus, Zcash just upgraded its mainnet and fixed the vulnerabilities, so the infrastructure looks pretty good. Third, a rise is the biggest positive factor. When prices surge, market sentiment surges, and the cryptocurrency sector rises across the board. Fueled by the bears' stampede, funds form a positive feedback loop. Can you chase this wave? I advise you not to get carried away just yet. The plan is quite big, but the ETF hasn't taken shape yet. The $110 million investment injection is supposedly a "non-binding" negotiation, and it could change at any time. What's worse is that you can't figure out the intentions of the dog farm—using this vague positive news to boost sales is the classic scenario in the crypto world. If you really want to touch it, don't bet your life on the number 855. Either wait for it to pull back to around 760 and hold up, or wait for it to really break through 870—don't let hesitation and FOMO get you bought back. #BTC冲高后震荡, ETF funds continued to flow into #ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #英伟达AI服务器或涨价超15% $BTC $ETH Why is the Nasdaq in Ireland cheaper than QQQ?
I calculated with $100,000
With the same $100,000, buying
QQQ
, if the person passes away
there is about a 10.8% inheritance tax, the US will take $10,800
If it's CNDX, this tax is 0
Then I calculated the difference in management fees for the next year
QQQ is about $180
CNDX is about $300
Only a $120 difference per year, but the inheritance tax is over ten thousand at once
If you plan to hold this $100,000 for a long time
Buy $100,000. On the day the person passes, you pay tax based on the value
If it rises to $500,000, QQQ pays about $140,000
If it reaches $1,000,000, about $330,000
What about CNDX? Still 0
So Ireland is cheaper not because of the annual fee
CNDX is 0.30% per year, QQQ is only 0.18%
Looking at the annual fee alone, Ireland is actually more expensive
If mainland tax residents fill out the tax reduction form correctly
QQQ dividends will be withheld 10%
CNDX within the fund will withhold 15%
The real savings is one thing: inheritance tax, which is also the biggest burden
If the amount is small, for personal use, and might be sold: QQQ is more convenient
If you want to hold this $100,000 for a long time and want to leave it to your family
I think CNDX is more cost-effective 🚨 BITCOIN DIDN’T JUST PUMP — LIQUIDITY SHIFTED.
$BTC jumped nearly 25% as long-term Treasury yields cooled off. The 30Y yield fell from 5.34% → 5.19%, while the Treasury doubled long-bond buybacks to $4B per operation.
Lower yields = easier financial conditions = more fuel for crypto. 🚀
Now the big question: Is this the start of a bigger BTC breakout?
#BTC #BTCETFInflowsSurge #ETHTests2500 #NvidiaServerPriceHike
#DailyOrbit $ZEC experiences short-term volatile fluctuations, with frequent sharp rises and falls.
ZEC has a characteristic: when the overall market is stable, it often follows its own news to create independent trends; but once BTC experiences a major drop, ZEC generally suffers a deep sell-off.
The market has already priced in halving, shielded pool growth, and ETF expectations, and many profit-taking holders are waiting to exit.
Short-term risk focus: small market cap, large contract funds, easily controlled by capital, very low tolerance for chasing highs, often followed by rapid pullbacks the next day after a big surge. #BTC冲高后震荡，ETF资金持续流入
This rally is a "short squeeze + macro expectations" double hit, and the short squeeze momentum is fading. After surging to $79,500 on August 22, it quickly fell back to $77,000, triggering $547 million in leveraged long liquidations. This is not a trend reversal, but a natural cooldown after a violent rebound.
Intraday on August 22, it once approached the $80,000 mark, then sharply dropped 1.42% within 15 minutes, falling from $78,592 to $76,500. As of August 23, BTC traded at $76,536, down 0.8% in 24 hours.
The driving logic is clear—the Treasury raised the long-term bond repurchase limit from $2 billion to $4 billion, and the 30-year yield fell from 5.34% to 5.19%. But repurchases are not quantitative easing, just structural operations; after the pulse, the bond market is repricing. RSI(14) once hit a severe overbought zone at 83.82, so technically it needs to digest.
On the ETF side, this week Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $1.9 billion, the highest since October 2025. BlackRock's IBIT contributed $239.3 million alone. But the $307.5 million inflow on August 22 was already lower than Wednesday's $606 million, indicating a slowing inflow slope. This giant whale's moves are worth keeping an eye on
Starting from the end of June, it averaged $1,777 to bottom-fish 79,000 ETH, while simultaneously buying 1,400 WBTC.
After buying, it didn't just sit idle; it immediately staked to earn yield.
ETH was put into Lido and Spark for yield, while BTC was held onto.
When the market rallied, it sold in batches.
ETH was sold at an average of $2,281 for 15,700 coins, WBTC sold at an average of $78,235 for 110 coins, pocketing about $9.5 million in three days.
This is not chasing highs and selling lows.
It's a very typical pattern:
Buying chips at a low price → DeFi yield farming → Taking profits in batches as prices rise
What’s more worth watching now is how much it still holds.
Currently, it still has about 42,500 wstETH + 1,000 WBTC, with a book value exceeding $200 million.
So, I’m actually less concerned about how much it has already earned.
I’m more interested in the next move:
If this giant whale continues transferring coins to exchanges, it could signal short-term selling pressure.
Conversely, if it stops transferring in, or even continues buying back, the market might need to reinterpret the situation.
True big money never tells you "I'm selling."
Watching where its money flows is more useful than guessing what it’s thinking.
$BTC $ETH ETH $2,400 Defense: Was the price support structure created by long position dominance the short squeeze the real driving force behind this rebound? The original poster shared that ETH rose from the $1,900 range to $2,500, and despite corrections, maintained a long position at $2,400 while realizing profits. The poster pointed out two key facts. First, ETH surged by more than 30% in a short period, and second, the $2,400 support level was repeatedly confirmed even during correction phases. This is the poster's personal experience, but when you look at the price structure and derivative positioning together, it provides clues to the overall market capital behavior. The hallmark of this ETH rally is that forced liquidations of positions in the derivatives market accelerated the rise rather than spot buying. The $1,900 to $2,500 range was a concentrated zone where short positions accumulated during past declines. As the price quickly passed through this range, a chain of short liquidations occurred, which then turned into buying pressure and accelerated the rise