Orbit Post Sitemap
Silicon Valley giants are investing tens of billions in AI while worrying: will AI eventually slip out of human control?🔥
The discussion is no longer just about alignment and model evaluation jargon within the circle, but real-world issues:
Will jobs disappear massively? Will power concentrate in the hands of a few giants? If AI goes out of control, who is responsible?
I focus on AI × Crypto.
AI doesn’t want AI concept coins, but computing power, data, agents, payments, and asset settlement.
Division of the track:
BTC｜Value foundation
ETH｜Hosts agents, DeFi, stablecoins, on-chain finance
SOL｜Focuses on AI agents, on-chain payments, high-frequency applications
The opportunity is not in slapping on the AI label.
It’s about who can undertake this economic activity when AI autonomously earns money, pays, and calls computing power.
Centralized AI grabs intelligence; Crypto competes for the computing power, data, payments, and value distribution behind intelligence.
This is the core direction worth paying attention to in AI+Crypto.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
$BTC $ETH $ZEC The CLARITY Act faces a crucial vote tonight — despite absorbing 126 amendments, it still struggles to secure unanimous Democratic support?
At 14:15 Eastern Time on September 15 (02:15 Beijing Time on September 16), the U.S. Senate will hold a cloture vote to end debate and proceed to consideration of the CLARITY Act.
Republican draft concessions: claims to have incorporated 126 substantive amendments proposed by Democrats, including about 80% of the ethics provisions from the Tillis-Gallego plan accepted by Trump.
Ethics provisions: require relevant officials to divest significant crypto holdings or place them in blind trusts, and grant state attorneys general certain enforcement powers.
Democratic opposition: some senators believe the ethics rules for officials, stablecoin incentives, state-level enforcement, and developer liability provisions remain insufficient and are coordinating to propose a counterproposal.
The vote requires 60 votes to proceed, merely deciding whether the bill can enter formal consideration. Republicans hold 53 seats, so at least 7 Democrats or independents must support it.
This procedural vote determines if the bill can move to formal consideration. With a 60-vote threshold, bipartisan compromise is key, but the "compromise version" may not meet the industry's expectations for "clear regulation" — the unified U.S. digital asset regulatory framework remains at a crossroads between delay and implementation.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC $CAP in 24 hours +35.68% versus BTC +0.19% — difference +35.49 p.p.
With a position at 72% within the daily range, the question is simple: is this real relative strength or is the movement already fading? $BTC BTC Latest: South Korea’s crypto tax petition has crossed 50K signatures and reached parliamentary review.
Don’t mistake it for a major bullish catalyst. It’s only a public petition, not passed legislation, and seeks a 2-year delay—not cancellation.
The bounce looks more like a short-term pulse than a trend shift. Fed/FOMC macro still matters more.
Watch BTC, $ETH ETH and $ZEC ZEC resistance zones. If the rebound stalls, the top could offer a short setup. Trade in batches with tight sts.Chess players never resign only when they are down in material; they should see the losing position by the seventh move.
$ENA is currently in such a position: it has only slipped 1.37% in 24 hours, seemingly calm, but in fact, it is pressed at the very bottom of the short-term Bollinger Bands — the price position is only 3%, with just 0.1% breathing room from the lower band. This is not sideways movement; this is the pawn chain suffocating, pinned right before the baseline.
Looking at the RSI: the 1-hour level has already dropped to 30.1, breaking below the 38 warning line, a classic oversold zone. The long-term RSI remains steady at 51.6 mid-level, indicating this is not a crash but a sacrifice. The opponent is baiting me out, while my pawn structure remains intact — the long-term levels are unbroken, specifically my d-line and e-line.
The mid-term Bollinger Band position is at 14%, 1.4% from the lower band, and 8.3% from the upper band. This odds ratio is like exchanging a pawn for the opponent’s elephant: the downside space is locked, while the upside has an 8.3% open line. We don’t need a miracle, just arithmetic — risk of 13.1%, reward of 8.3% to 5.1% dual targets. This is a typical midgame exchange, trading a controllable loss for a path to the endgame rook and knight.
My habit is not to rush on the first move but to press when the opponent reveals structural weaknesses. The current price is 0.08, and my entry anchor is set at 0.08 — placing a pawn 2.8% below the current price, waiting for the opponent to push their pawn and take the bait, so I can complete the encirclement at a low position.
📈 Long:
Entry: 0.08 (current price -2.8%)
Take Profit 1: 0.09 (+5.1%)
Take Profit 2: 0.09 (+8.3%)
Stop Loss: 0.07 (-13.1%)
This is not an all-in; it’s like moving a knight to c5, controlling the entire board’s tempo. The short-term oversold is a crack in the opponent’s formation, and the long-term stability is my undefeated baseline. While the market is still tangled in that 1.37% noise, I have already locked my target at the 8.3% black square — that is the checkmate position.The biggest risk right now may not be the rate decision itself. It’s what the Fed says after the decision. 👀 Markets are already positioning aggressively around the FOMC, with traders watching inflation, employment, and Powell’s guidance for the next policy path. If the Fed delivers a 25 bps hike, the initial reaction could be violent across risk assets. But here’s the key: A rate hike doesn’t automatically mean “BTC down.” Markets trade expectations. If the decision is already priced in, BTC cAt the 77666 level, the order book is thin, with a dense trading zone from 78400 to 78800 above, where many trapped positions exist. On-chain stablecoins haven't seen much net inflow these days, indicating that off-exchange funds are watching and not rushing to enter the market to catch the dip. Contract open interest hasn't decreased; both longs and shorts are adding positions, with the funding rate slightly positive, showing retail long sentiment is still present. Under this structure, an upward surge is easily pushed back, while a downward drop is smoother.
I just opened the guardhouse window for some fresh air; downstairs, a few people are gathered noisily in front of the parcel locker to pick up packages.
In terms of trading, lightly short between 77600 and 77900, with stop loss set above 78600—don't hold onto losing positions. The first target is 76200; reduce half the position there, and the rest targets 75500. If volume breaks below 75500, directly chase shorts aiming for 74200. Avoid long positions for now; wait to see if there's support near 75500 after a wick. The defense point is 78600; if broken, admit the mistake and exit—don't fight the market. At this level, the risk-reward ratio isn't good, so control your position size and don't get emotional.
$BTC
#Robinhood股票代币拟支持实物赎回及投票
@OKX星球 $BTC is currently fluctuating around $77K, $ETH is back close to $2.5K, and $XRP's short-term activity is clearly higher than the two major mainstream assets. The real test is approaching. The Federal Reserve's interest rate decision is about to be announced, and the U.S. Senate is also advancing important cryptocurrency legislative discussions. Meanwhile, volatility in the AI sector, along with oil prices and supply chain risks, may further influence market risk appetite. So I won't rush to judge whether the market will rise or fall right now. I'm more focused on several signals 👇 🟢 after the data release: Is capital flowing back into risk assets? 🟢 Can BTC regain its key resistance? 🟢 Is ETH truly following the trend? 🟢 When altcoins rise, is there volume and capital coordination? 🟢 After a pullback, are buyers willing to re-enter? News is just a catalyst; the market's actual reaction is the signal. If BTC holds the $76K–$77K range and regains volume, market sentiment may continue to improve; If support is breached, caution is needed for further volatility. The best strategy now is not to chase rises and sell lows, but to wait for the market to give its own answer. Observe first, then act. Confirm > guess #FOMCRateCallThisWeek #AIAnxietyHitsChipStocks #SaudiOilPipelineDamaged #DailyOrbitThe price is hugging the upper Bollinger Band with only 0.1% clearance left. This is not a breakout; this is structural stress reaching the reinforcement limit—I won’t sign off at this position.
I have been doing structural design for twenty years. What I fear most is never slow floor construction, but load-bearing walls cracking while the contractor is still hanging renderings. $DOT is now a typical case of "intact facade, poorly backfilled foundation."
It rose 1.74% in 24 hours. Don’t be fooled by this number; 1.74% in structural terms isn’t even a normal thermal expansion or contraction. It’s just a slight sway of the load under wind vibration. What’s truly critical is the position: within the short-term Bollinger Band, the price has already reached 94% of the band height, with only 0.1% clearance to the upper band, and the lower band is 2.1% away. Translated into construction terms—upward construction space is sealed off, below is a 2.1% cavity, and one hammer strike will cause settlement of the backfill layer.
The mid-term Bollinger Band is even clearer: price position at 101%, upper band margin -0.0%. Negative margin. On the blueprint, this is called over-limit design; on site, it’s pouring concrete after the formwork is already at its limit.
Looking at the uneven settlement indicators: short-term RSI is 65.6, approaching the overbought acceptance red line; long-term RSI is only 46.8, still below the midline. The conflicting data from these two elevation sets indicate the building’s load-bearing system is not aligned at all—the upper floors are rushing to top out, while the lower floors lack reinforcement. I can’t sign off on such a structure.
So the plan is clear: do not short at the current position; wait for an invalid rebound. When it rebounds to 0.87, that is the previous structural beam’s stress point, the secondary loading point, the most fragile node.
📉 Short:
Entry: 0.87 (current price +4.7%)
Take Profit 1: 0.77 (6.5% below entry)
Take Profit 2: 0.80 (3.3% below entry)
Stop Loss: 0.97 (17.1% above entry)
The stop loss is set 17.1% above entry, not out of conservatism, but to leave redundancy for the structure. If the bulls really push the price above 0.97, it means I misjudged the entire foundation, then I’ll admit it and redraw the blueprint. But considering the 0.1% clearance at the upper band and the 46.8 long-term RSI load capacity, this probability is low.
The ecological construction is similar. The white paper is just a blueprint anyone can draw. What really determines whether $DOT can build a skyscraper is the construction speed of parachains, the load redundancy of cross-chain bridges, and the margin developers have to keep adding layers without collapse. No matter how beautiful the blueprint, if the concrete grade is insufficient, it will be a dangerous building in three years.
I won’t act today. Wait for that rebound scaffold to reach 0.87, then lay the first pile. #coinmovealertWhy do meme coins leave a lasting impression?
1. The brain imprint of a get-rich-quick memory
Characteristics of meme coin markets: tens to hundreds of times gains in a short period, achieving in days what others take years to earn.
Once someone has caught a golden opportunity with a meme coin, this profit forms a strong positive memory in the brain. The brain selectively remembers that one big win and automatically ignores numerous zeroed-out or losing trades.
Even if they suffer repeated losses afterward, the mind keeps replaying that hundredfold gain, always believing the next token will replicate it—this is the source of obsession.
Conversely, those who have never caught such a break, when seeing screenshots of hundredfold profits shared in communities, experience intense FOMO, feeling the opportunity lies in the next new coin and unwilling to miss out.
2. Extremely low entry barriers, everyone harbors fantasies of getting rich quick
Meme coins have very low issuance costs; small amounts of capital can participate, with just a few hundred USDT enough to jump in.
Compared to BTC or tech stocks in the US market, which require huge capital for significant returns, meme coins allow small investments to dream of hundredfold turnarounds. This low-cost leverage on high returns easily creates the illusion of "ordinary people making a comeback."
What people are obsessed with is not the coin itself, but the possibility of changing their account fate with a small amount of capital.
3. Emotional frenzy created by narratives and communities
Meme coins don’t rely on products or revenue to support value; they rely on memes, stories, and community bonding.
In TG and X communities, everyone discusses, calls trades, and shares holdings together, forming collective emotions. When the market rises, community sentiment peaks, and everyone reinforces the expectation of getting rich quick.
This sense of collective participation is an experience mainstream assets don’t offer. The market is not just about price movements Once interest rates are raised, are they shouting about $40,000 again?
When prices rise, they shout 300,000; when they fall, they shout 30,000.
When the market changes, opinions shift accordingly—in short, the wind is on the other side.
If it really drops to 30,000 yuan, do you think they'll rush in to buy the dip?
Most likely not.
Because the harshest part of the market is: when it's cheap, no one dares to buy; When everyone thinks it's safe, the price is already expensive.
So at this position, I'm actually more willing to focus on opportunities rather than constantly guessing the top and bottom.
$BTC Still around 79,000 yuan, a few days ago it hit a low of around 76,500 yuan;
$ETH repeatedly fluctuated between 2550 and 2600, rising over 5% intraday.
$OKB's performance is also worth watching, rebounding from around 111 to around 114 a few days ago, and is currently testing the 115-118 supply zone.
More importantly, X Layer DeFi's locked value has approached $232 million, and with a fixed total of 21 million tokens, market attention is heating up.
On the market side, you look at price; on the capital side, you look at direction.
Now, let's look at the biggest variable these past two days—the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision.
Logically, with hawkish interest rates and risk assets under pressure, the crypto market should have taken the brunt first.
But this time is a little different.
Negative news fermented early, and the market had already anticipated trading in advance. When it actually materialized, short-term reactions of "negative news being realized" might actually occur.
#DailyOrbit These folks in Silicon Valley are spending tens of billions building AI while starting to worry: will this thing eventually get out of their control?
The discussion now is no longer about alignment, eval, and other insider jargon, but more practical questions:
Will jobs disappear?
Will power concentrate in a few giants?
If AI goes out of control, who is responsible?
I’m actually more focused on AI × Crypto.
What AI really needs isn’t an "AI concept coin," but computing power, data, agents, payments, and asset settlement.
So the direction I’m watching now is very clear:
BTC, as the value foundation.
ETH, to support agents, DeFi, stablecoins, and on-chain finance.
SOL, focusing on AI agents, on-chain payments, and high-frequency applications.
The real opportunity isn’t slapping an AI label on a coin.
It’s about who can take on this economic activity when AI starts making money, paying, and calling computing power on its own.
Centralized AI competes for "intelligence."
What Crypto can truly compete for is the computing power, data, payments, and value distribution behind that intelligence.
This is where AI × Crypto is really worth betting on.
If AI truly has its own economic activity in the future, which do you think will benefit first: $BTC, $ETH, or $SOL? #AI发展焦虑升温，芯片股集体走弱 U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Proposed to be Written into Federal Law, Holdings Locked for at Least 20 Years
The U.S. House Financial Services Committee will review H.R.8957 and its alternative amendments at 10:00 AM Eastern Time on September 16. Key points of the new bill:
Written into law: The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) will be codified into federal law, with the Treasury Department centrally managing eligible government BTC.
Long-term lock: Holdings are to be held for at least 20 years in principle.
Enhanced oversight: Establish annual reserve certification and third-party audits.
Neutral accumulation: Only requires studying budget-neutral ways to increase holdings; does not authorize borrowing, new taxes, or deficit-funded purchases.
Will this review push the bill to the full House, and can a reserve system without explicit new purchase authorization create sustained market demand?
The bill upgrades the executive order to federal law, locking in a "no sell" policy but does not commit to "buying." For the market, this is a step forward in institutional protection but not a direct supply-demand positive. Short-term sentiment may be boosted, but long-term growth still requires real incremental buying.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC BTC just refused to break down—and that changes the whole game. 👀
I had just posted a short $CORE trade report next door when I turned back to check BTC.
$BTC held stubbornly around 76,500, then printed a strong bullish candle and started reversing. That’s not the kind of price action you want to ignore when you’re holding an altcoin short.
My $CORE short is still in profit, but BTC’s reaction has me watching much more carefully now.
#DailyOrbit Is losing money as soon as you open a position also a kind of talent?STANDARD's market value surged to 40 million within two hours of opening, but now it has fallen back to 28.91 million, with trading volume breaking 40 million.
From a market-making perspective, this turnover rate is not low. With 98.32 million tokens in circulation, Genesis only put 100 million into the pool, meaning almost all tradable tokens are in the Uniswap v4 ETH pool.
That's the problem. The basic issuance is 700,000 tokens per day, with a maximum multiplier of 1.25x. Only after net ETH inflows does issuance expand, and net outflows are bought back and burned. It sounds like an automatic central bank, but when prices fall, inflows turn into outflows. Where does the buyback money come from?
No matter how beautifully written the white paper is, on the first day, the real decision is still on Chi Zi Shen and who is taking charge.
Do you think how much of this 40 million yuan in trading volume was actually swapped by the market makers themselves?
#OKX预言家: Come play prediction on Planet $ETH Still greedy
Still holding to break even, not running
Regret when it falls
$BTC, can you be tough just once?
Can I profit and then leave?
This 1.133 $BTC long position
Cost at 79460
Currently floating loss is almost 2000U
Previously reluctant to run when breaking even
Now regret again after falling to 77700
But 73915 is the liquidation line
Not yet the time to admit defeat
—
The hardest thing for $BTC now is not holding above 78000
Tomorrow it will face the Federal Reserve again
The market has priced in about 93% chance of a 25 basis point rate hike
Oil price surged to 107 dollars
The 10-year US Treasury yield has also risen back above 5%
Short-term indeed suppressing risk assets
But the negative factors have already been priced in so much in advance
If it really lands, watch out for a short squeeze
I’m first watching 78500
Then the 79460 cost line
If it breaks below 76000
Can’t fool myself that it’s just a shakeout anymore
—
$ZEC is a different story
Now back near 1165
Longs were liquidated a round a few days ago
1100 hasn’t been completely lost
1200 to 1220 above is still strong resistance
If it can really close above 1200 with volume
There’s still a chance to test the previous high at 1297
But if 1100 breaks
I’ll first watch 1050 or even 1000
This coin has been too volatile recently
Chasing up or down is easy to get slapped twice
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
#沙特关键输油管道受损，或停运数周 ETF FLOWS MAY BE SIGNALING A SHIFT IN ALLOCATION
As of Sept. 14:
$BTC :+$25.69M daily → $55.18B cumulative
$ETH :+$26.13M daily → $13.42B cumulative
The key isn’t just the total inflow — it’s the narrowing daily flow gap.
ETH is attracting nearly as much ETF capital as BTC while showing stronger relative price structure.
👀 Capital may be gradually broadening beyond BTC.
Watch BTC vs ETH ETF flows and relative strength. Sometimes, capital rotation appears in flows.#FOMCRateCallThisWeek $BTC BTC has experienced its third single-block reorganization within four weeks. Many people panic when they see the word "reorganization." Actually, what deserves more attention is another matter.
On August 16, block 962,722.
On August 24, block 963,853.
On September 11, block 966,500.
The latest time, SpiderPool and AntPool almost simultaneously mined valid blocks, with the AntPool branch ultimately winning and the SpiderPool block being discarded. Galaxy Research states this is the third single-block reorganization within four weeks.
I believe this is not yet a BTC security crisis. It’s more like simultaneous block mining by pools plus network propagation delay.
Currently, there is no evidence of a 51% attack, consensus failure, or systemic double-spending.
But it reminds everyone of a very real fact: 1 confirmation does not equal final settlement.
There are only three signals to truly be wary of:
Reorganizations extending from 1 block to 2 or more blocks.
Abnormalities starting to occur continuously.
Reorganizations being concentrated long-term in the same mining pool.
Right now, I will not short BTC because of this.
1 block is just noise.
Continuous deep reorganizations are the real risk. I will continue to monitor and provide timely updates!$BTC is still fluctuating around $77K, while $ETH is hovering around $2.5K. In contrast, $XRP has been noticeably more active in the short term recently. But what truly deserves attention next may not be the candlestick itself. ⏰ With the Federal Reserve's rate decision approaching, progress in crypto regulatory legislation in the U.S. Senate may become a new catalyst for volatility. Combined with oil prices, geopolitical risks, and rising AI concerns among tech stocks, market sentiment can easily shift quickly. So I won't rush to judge whether the next candlestick will rise or fall right now. What I want to watch more is what happens after the news lands: 🟢 Will funds flow back into risk assets? 🟢 Can BTC regain key resistance? 🟢 Will ETH show true relative strength? 🟢 Can XRP and other altcoins continue to follow by capital? 🟢 Or will liquidity pullback occur after the positive news is realized? The real direction is often not the moment the headline appears, but after the market has digested the news. The most important strategy now is: wait for confirmation, not chase gains and sell losses #FOMCRateCallThisWeek #AIAnxietyHitsChipStocks #SaudiOilPipelineDamaged #DailyOrbitHolding a short position for twenty-six days, $ETH was forcibly liquidated at 2627; switched to setting a stop loss, $PEPE short position had a 10% floating profit but didn't exit, the rebound triggered the stop loss, then it fell back again.
The results were the same twice, but the mechanisms were different. The former was a forced liquidation by the system due to margin exhaustion, the latter was the stop loss order itself becoming a resting order.
Market makers can see the cluster of stop losses; the cost to trigger them is often lower than the cost of letting the market continue. This is not targeting anyone, liquidity is attacked wherever it is.
Account has 125U, 100U running grid trading, the grid has no fixed stop loss points, so it can't be triggered. To judge if being targeted, focus on one thing: whether the price immediately reverses after the stop loss is triggered. If this happens frequently, the problem lies in stop loss levels being chosen too neatly, not in the discipline itself.
#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元
#ZEC机构资金入场，高位杠杆开始出清 $ETH $PEPE $CNPY Earning this money gave me no sense of achievement at all, purely luck.
Just finished lunch and checked the market, the CNPY long position was still consolidating, buying pressure strengthened, it pulled back and held steady, with support below. Around 0.1855 I gave a tip: if support isn’t broken, buy the dip, don’t wait until it rallies to regret.
Then it took off directly, 0.3045 gave the answer, +1279.78% in hand. Those on board must have woken up laughing, nailed it perfectly.
If the trend isn’t broken, hold on; if it breaks, run—don’t fall in love with the market.
I took profit on 75% first, kept 25% at cost price for protection, and moved the stop loss closer to cost. There’s still opportunity, better to lock in profits first.
For friends who haven’t gotten on board yet, listen to me: chasing highs easily leaves you stuck at the peak, wait for a more comfortable position in the next round. Move only when the next signal comes. Even if you only make one point, as long as you can take it away, it’s yours; any floating profit beyond that belongs to the market.
$ZEC $XRP 📊 Options Strategy | Implied Volatility Percentile Timing Method
The core of options is "buy cheap, sell expensive," and the implied volatility percentile is the measure:
① Define ranges: Take the target cryptocurrency's historical volatility percentile over the past 6-12 months and divide it into three tiers — below 30 is low, 30-70 is neutral, above 70 is high.
② Strategy comparison: When low, buyers have the advantage (cheap); when high, sellers have the advantage (expensive); in the neutral range, use neutral strategies (straddles, butterflies).
③ Find anchor points: When the ratio of volatility percentile to historical volatility > 1.3, it's overpriced; < 0.8, it's underpriced.
④ Practical discipline: Single strategy position should not exceed 3% of total holdings; expiration dates segmented (30/45/60 days); avoid event windows (earnings, Fed meetings, protocol upgrades) 3 days prior.
⑤ Review: At the end of each month, check if the volatility percentile has returned to the median; if not, reduce positions by half.
💡 Essence: Options are a volatility business; direction is just a trigger, timing is the source of profit. Collect rent when volatility is expensive, pick up chips when cheap.
🔗 Data sources: Deribit, Binance Options, OKX Options historical volatility panels, Greek letter dashboards.
Word count within 1000 characters: about 380 characters "ETH Lifeline: The Bull-Bear Battle at $2500, Institutions Are 'Sneaking Ahead'" $ETH
ETH is stuck at the $2500 mark, appearing calm on the surface but turbulent beneath.
Bulls hold strong cards: The total staked ETH on the network has surpassed 43 million, accounting for over 35% of the supply, a historic high, with the exit queue at zero and another 1.78 million queued to enter — holders' willingness to lock up is unprecedented. On the ETF side, net inflows hit $1.75 billion in August, a one-year high, with $216 million added on September 11 alone; BlackRock's ETHA accounted for $149 million. BitMine has staked about 5.07 million ETH, representing 11.8% of the entire network's validation.
But bears have seized the lifeline: Around $2550 coinciding with the 50-week moving average, ETH has failed to break through three times; this level has suppressed every rebound since August. More troubling, stubborn August CPI data has pushed the market's pricing for a September 16 Fed rate hike to 87%, raising financing costs for risk assets across the board. The 60.62% gain in Q3 has also built up significant profit-taking pressure.
Conclusion: If this week's FOMC signals balance, ETH could retest $2600; if hawks dominate, the liquidation zone below $2400, involving over $1.2 billion in longs, will be triggered. This is not a question of direction, but of timing. #ETH触及2500美元后震荡 Negative news has already piled up at the doorstep, yet BTC and ETH just won't fall.
This is the signal I care about most right now.
In the early hours of tomorrow, the market will face two major tests:
🗳️ Procedural voting on the CLARITY Act
This is a cloture vote to end the debate, not the final pass. You need 60 votes to proceed, and the Republican Party currently has only 53 seats, meaning at least seven more Democratic members or other voters need to be secured.
🏦 Federal Reserve interest rate decision
Currently, market expectations for rate hikes are already very high, with the latest survey showing that about 85% of economists expect a 25 basis point hike this week.
Logically, with these two dangers facing each other at the same time, Crypto should be trembling.
But reality is somewhat abnormal.
$BTC If it drops, someone buys; if $ETH pulls back, someone buys.
Each sell-off is quickly pulled back, and the rebound doesn't show obvious selling pressure.
This made me start to think:
If the market truly believes that "rate hikes + CLARITY fail," why not dump prices early now?
Could it be that what the market is trading isn't even the obvious negative news we see?
Right now, I'm more focused on two possibilities:
(1) CLARITY has made better-than-expected progress this time, even successfully securing key votes;
(2) Although the market strongly bets on rate hikes, the Fed ultimately chose to hold steady or sent more dovish signals than expected.
#DailyOrbit Canaan Technology mined 44 $BTC in August, completely liquidated all 3,952 ETH, and sold 54 BTC at average prices of approximately $2,400 and $79,000 respectively, cashing out about $13.9 million in total, of which $5.4 million was used to repurchase about 13.6 million ADS.
They precisely seized the monthly Bitcoin peak to cash out. In August, Bitcoin experienced a rare surge, breaking through four major integer thresholds consecutively from around $64,000 at the beginning of the month, reaching a high of $81,255, with a monthly increase of 25%. Canaan chose to sell BTC at an average price of $79,000 during this window, demonstrating an accurate judgment of the price range. After the sale, they still held 1,868 BTC, with the liquidation focused on ETH, clearly indicating an asset allocation adjustment.
Canaan Technology's August actions of liquidating ETH, partially reducing BTC holdings, and repurchasing ADS essentially represent a combined operation of "cashing out at a high level + liquidity management + market value maintenance." Behind this is the reality of continued sluggish mining machine sales and the forced shift to self-operated mining taking the lead. Low electricity costs and the remaining 1,868 BTC holdings provide some buffer, but with nearly $100 million in losses in a single quarter, the repurchase can only boost confidence in the short term. To truly turn the situation around, a recovery in hardware orders or further release of mining scale benefits is still needed. The $UNI tokens burned actually come out of the pockets of liquidity providers, which means us retail investors. Suddenly, the Sha County snacks in our mouths don't taste so good anymore!
The root cause of UNI's recent repricing is a mechanism issue that most people haven't looked into carefully; the burned tokens are not earned by the protocol itself but are taken from the real money of liquidity providers.
Under the old rules, all trading fees went to LPs. After the UNIfication passed last December, the protocol started charging fees, taking a portion into the TokenJar, and the community then uses Firepit to burn $UNI with these fees.
So the burn volume suddenly increased, annualizing to about $90 million, close to 4% of the circulating supply, at the cost of reducing LPs' share.
Whether LPs will withdraw liquidity because of this is the key variable to watch in this round. The current fix is to include Unichain's sequencer fees into the burn, using the native chain to cover the gap.
Meanwhile, $UNI doubled in 30 days to 6.65, standing 11% above the MA20 (6.0) and 40% above the MA50 (4.74), maintaining a complete bullish structure; but the 20-day high of 7.48 was left on September 6, and the current price is still 11% below it, indicating this wave is oscillating below the previous high.
I feel that whether the bullish logic holds depends on whether trading volume can continue to expand enough to cover LP losses. Burning your own liquidity to create scarcity—that's the most expensive kind of scarcity!September 15 Midday Market Analysis:
Today's 4302 Long-Short Watershed
Holding above 4300, short-term rebound continues, resistance: 4309‑4315→4326→4347→4360
Breaking below 4288, the market weakens due to rate hike expectations, support: 4277, 4249; key support 4233‑4224, may see an oversold rebound followed by another decline.
This week's ultimate bullish support is 4193
Reminder: Sideways movement near 4300 is prone to false breakouts and shakeouts; avoid blind bottom-fishing, only trade key levels
Macro Core | September Rate Decision Sets Stage Direction
Six Major Drivers: Federal Reserve policy, US stocks, US bonds, oil prices, geopolitics, Japan rate hike (potential black swan)
Short-term, the dollar and US bonds are unlikely to collapse; the strong dollar cycle is not over.
The Fed prioritizes stabilizing US bonds and curbing inflation, with a higher probability of a rate hike.
This time leans toward a preventive single rate hike, not restarting a continuous rate hike cycle.
The rate hike implementation may force multiple countries to tighten policies, delaying the global rate cut cycle and pressuring liquidity.
The market is driven by expectations; the rate decision will determine the subsequent trend of gold. #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ $XAU LIQUIDITY: BTC IS THE ASSET, ETH IS THE INFRASTRUCTURE
$BTC and $ETH use different liquidity models.
$BTC concentrates liquidity around a scarce, standardized asset — supporting store-of-value demand, trading, and institutional capital.
$ETH takes another path: infrastructure where stablecoins, tokenized assets, DeFi, and financial applications interact.
BTC concentrates liquidity around an asset
ETH expands liquidity across an ecosystem
Different models — same goal: shaping crypto capital flowsBTC hits a wall, BNB plays dead, LSK's short squeeze leaves a mess — none of these three brothers are easy to deal with.
$BTC current price 78,161, down 0.52%. It touched 79,600 in the early morning, just a breath away from 80,000, then got pushed back down. CryptoQuant says breaking through the 365-day moving average at 81,700 is needed to confirm a bull market; for now, it's still range-bound. Today's low is 76,394, with 539,000 BTC held by long-term holders selling between 77,100-80,200 weighing down the price. I haven't moved my position; if 80,000 can't hold, I'll wait.
$BNB current price about 721, slightly down 0.31%. BNB Chain has led the entire network this year in the RWA sector, adding $3.62 billion, with DeFi TVL surging to $5.66 billion. Fundamentals are positive, but the price is stuck around 720. The core resistance is between 750-770; it touched 770 in early September but was pushed back. I placed a small order at 720, waiting for the interest rate decision.
$LSK current price 0.39184. On Sunday, it surged from around 0.1 to 2.37, then halved. In 24 hours, liquidations reached 41.13 million, with shorts accounting for 33.68 million, a short squeeze spiral. The official plan is to burn 100 million tokens, reducing total supply from 400 million to 300 million. But the chain will shut down on October 31, with migration ending October 21 — less than 40 days left. The chain is disappearing; no matter how much is burned, it's just dressing up the narrative. I'm staying away.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
( ・ω・)o-Is Bitcoin really afraid of interest rate hikes, or is it afraid of the 10-year US Treasury yield reaching 5%????
Many people are now only focused on whether the Federal Reserve will raise rates by 25 basis points, but today I am more focused on the 10-year Treasury.
The Fed kept the policy rate at 3.5% to 3.75% in July, and the US Treasury announced that the 10-year yield on September 14 has already reached 4.97%. A short-term rate hike can be priced in advance by the market. If the long-term yield lingers around 5%, the cost of capital in the coming years will also become more expensive.
This difference is very important for BTC.
As bond yields rise, you can get nearly 5% return without doing anything, so risk capital will naturally demand Bitcoin to offer greater upside potential. If BTC stays sideways for a long time, some funds will first move into bonds to wait.
Therefore, after the FOMC announcement, I will watch whether the 10-year Treasury and BTC can move in the same direction.
If after the rate hike the 10-year yield falls back below 4.9% and BTC climbs back above 79600, the most comfortable macro window for bears will basically be over.
If the 10-year yield stays above 5% and BTC simultaneously falls below 77378, I will view this round of volatility as downward.
It’s normal that the direction is still uncertain now. The first spike could be a fakeout on both sides; I will wait for bonds and Bitcoin to give the answer together.
$BTC $ETH
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Focusing on yourself is harder than focusing on the market.
There is always a next opportunity in the market, but your principal may not have a next round. Every time you add positions out of impulse, it's a betrayal of the system; every time you take a chance and don't cut losses, it's a provocation to risk.
$BTC is not for guessing, it's for setting direction.
Its sideways movement doesn't mean you should act; its movement doesn't mean you should chase. Its true value is to tell you whether to be aggressive or to be conservative now. When BTC is stable, the market has structure; when BTC is chaotic, all rhythms turn into noise. Position size should follow its state, not the news.
$ETH is not for rushing in, it's for ballast.
It won't explode for you every day, but it is one of the few assets in this market with cash flow. Stories can be told, but on-chain data won't cooperate with acting. The significance of ETH is not to let you overtake on curves, but to make you understand: some assets are meant to traverse cycles, not to bet on tomorrow.
$SOL is not for hoarding, it's for trading.
Its volatility determines it is suitable for swing trading, not for bottom holding. It rises fast and falls fast. Focus on two indicators only: whether active addresses truly grow, and whether ecosystem revenue truly increases. Sentiment can pump the price, but on-chain data can't lie.
The market is a sieve; what it filters out is never luck, but your cognition. If your logic is right, volatility is opportunity; if your logic is wrong, rises and falls are torment $BTC $ETH $ZEC
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #Anthropic拟赴纳斯达克IPO On the morning of 9.15, the FOMC's mindset was clear: don't chase longs before the decision, prioritize shorting the rebound to high levels.
BTC is now hovering around 77800-78200. On Monday, it was pulled from 76400 to 79600, only to be pushed back again. Don't just focus on the candlesticks; the key is that the rate hike has basically been digested by the market, yet longs are still betting on "dovish signals after the hike," and funding rates remain positive. The biggest fear in this structure isn't the rate hike itself, but that the dot plot might be more hawkish than expected. ETH is around 2515, moving in sync with BTC, failing to hold above 2600 and retreating.
The focus tonight isn't wild guessing but tomorrow's FOMC and the dot plot; today there's also the CLARITY procedural vote. If a 25 basis point hike is confirmed and the dot plot continues to be revised upward, BTC retesting 76000 wouldn't be surprising, and a harsher drop to 74500-73000 is possible. In terms of operations, short BTC in batches at 78800-79800, targeting 76000-74500; short ETH at 2560-2620, targeting 2480-2420. If BTC breaks and holds above 80000 with volume, the shorts are invalidated—don't fight the trend.
What do you think will happen after the decision: a drop to 76000 first, or a breakout above 80000? This is my personal view and not investment advice.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
#AI发展焦虑升温，芯片股集体走弱 The original text simply attributes the market rise to the main force inducing longs and sweeping shorts, which is too simplistic. The market trades on expectation gaps, not just news headlines. The probability of a rate hike has surged to 86%, meaning this hike is largely priced in already, so the negative news has been pre-absorbed and is not a sudden new negative factor. The slight market rise is partly due to short squeeze caused by crowded shorts, and partly because the market is pricing in that this hike will be only 25bp and not the start of multiple hikes.
It cannot be simply labeled as "the main force pumps then dumps." Both possibilities coexist: one is the original text's view of a pump and then a pullback; the other is the market confirming only one hike, and after the decision, risk appetite recovers and the market continues upward. If you only predict a pump trap, you may miss the real breakout or get stopped out.
1. $BTC: 79,800-82,000 is a strong resistance zone; once volume supports a stable break above, it’s not a pump trap; breaking below 76,000 opens the way down to 73,500.
2. $ETH: Resistance at 2,600-2,660, key support at 2,430; holding this keeps the consolidation structure intact.
3. $ZEC: Most volatile, resistance at 1,170-1,218, support at 1,090-1,121; altcoin funds move quickly.
4. $OKB: Resistance at 118-122, short-term support at 112.
Range-bound stop-loss sweeps before the decision are normal; a spike up is not necessarily a pump trap. The key is whether resistance can be broken with volume; do not prematurely fixate on bearish views.
Community rewritten version:
The Fed rate hike probability has soared to 86%, a major macro negative, yet BTC, ETH, ZEC, and OKB have slightly risen, confusing many.
Core logic: The market trades expectations; much of this hike is already priced in, so the negative is not a fresh variable. The upward move partly reflects forced short covering due to crowded shorts, and cannot be simply defined as a pump and dump by manipulators. Before the decision, both bulls and bears have room to maneuver; both scenarios are possible.
Key levels:
✅BTC: Resistance 79,800-82,000; support 76,000, break below targets 73,500
✅ETH: Resistance 2,600-2,660; support 2,430, break below targets 2,350
✅ZEC: Resistance 1,170-1,218, extreme 1,300; support 1,090-1,121
✅OKB: Resistance 118-122; short-term support 112, strong support 102
Volatility and stop-loss sweeps before the decision are normal. A spike up is not necessarily a pump trap; focus on whether resistance can be effectively broken, and avoid blindly predicting direction. According to on-chain monitoring, an Ethereum whale holding for over 4 years deposited 14,700 $ETH (worth over $37 million) to OKX early this morning, at an average price of $2,517. This address had accumulated over 20,000 coins during the bull market, endured the entire bear market, but now the cost basis is far above the current price, likely forcing a cut-loss exit.
In my opinion, the most psychologically challenging thing in crypto is never being trapped underwater, but enduring four harsh years of winter only to cut losses and cut tails at the $2,500 mark just before dawn. Diamond hands ultimately can't withstand the prolonged downtrend; this really marks the collective surrender of old coins, right? 😂😇
$BTC $ETHPeter Brandt's hard truth, most bloggers won't fully relay.
Why do the vast majority of retail investors end up not making money?
It's not because you can't read candlestick charts,
Nor is it necessarily because your information is slow.
It's that what you started studying from the beginning might have been wrong.
You keep watching every day
What the Federal Reserve said, how the CPI is doing, whether the candlestick chart is about to break through, which indicator has a golden cross.
But the real money is not here at all.
The real market game happens at a higher level.
Brandt says the real market is more like a private poker room upstairs,
For small players like you and me, many times we don't even count as chips on the table.
This sounds harsh, but it's very realistic.
The market has never been a game where everyone gets rich together.
Essentially, it's money slowly transferring from one group of people to another.
The more public and easier to learn something is, the more likely it is to get crushed.
Indicators, strategies, news, so-called insider info... once everyone knows, it loses value.
What really determines whether you survive is whether you can understand:
Who is buying, who is selling, who has patience, who is forced out.
Figuring out where you sit at the poker table is far more critical than chasing guaranteed profits everywhere.
As the old saying goes, veterans look at chips and profit-loss ratios, beginners look at stories and fantasies.#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ This FOMC is interesting; the market is no longer betting on inflation data but on whether the Federal Reserve can withstand political pressure from the White House.
Goldman Sachs and Reuters both lean toward a 25 basis point rate hike, with CME pricing nearly 90% in favor. The federal funds rate is very likely to be raised, but Trump and White House advisor Hassett have openly challenged this, saying the rate hike shouldn't happen. This clash of titans has pushed the market into an extreme wait-and-see deadlock.
BTC is currently holding firm around 78,000. Although institutional base positions are still holding strong, political uncertainty makes bulls hesitant to push hard. If the Fed caves under pressure, damaging the dollar's credit, BTC could have mid-term potential; if the Fed hikes firmly, the short term will only suffer.
ETH is clearly weaker this round. With U.S. Treasury yields above 5%, holding ETH is a losing proposition. When funds tighten even slightly, institutions will definitely prioritize selling ETH; its tendency to fall but not rise won't change in the short term.
XAUT, however, is supported by global central banks. As long as the underlying logic of a dollar credit crisis remains intact, gold won't fall much and its resilience is maximized.
The core conflict has long since shifted; stop fixating on inflation data. The market is truly trading the Fed's independence and policy credibility. Once this political drama concludes, the direction will naturally emerge. Don't bet heavily on direction before clarity. #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ @OKX星球 Brothers, something big has happened again in the Middle East. The 1,200-kilometer-long east-west oil pipeline running across Saudi Arabia was bombed by drones last week. The Saudi Ministry of Energy confirmed that the Riyadh and Medina sections were attacked multiple times on the morning of the 10th, resulting in injuries. The pipeline was forced to be closed preemptively, with repairs expected to take 3 to 5 weeks. This pipeline is the main alternative route for Saudi Arabia to bypass the strait after the Strait of Hormuz was sealed, diverting about 4 million barrels of crude oil daily to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, accounting for about 4% of global supply. The Saudi Foreign Ministry directly named the drones from inside Iraq and were launched by Iran-backed militias. The Iraqi Prime Minister's Office condemned the attack but has not yet clarified who was responsible. The Arab League condemned it with "strongest language," with the Gulf Cooperation Council, Jordan, and Qatar responding simultaneously. The most critical issue is the stockpiles. The current inventory at Yanbu Port can only sustain exports for 5 to 7 days. Storage capacity is about 35 million barrels, but inventories are not full. If pipelines cannot restart within a few days, Saudi exports will plummet, leaving a global oil supply gap of about 4%. Oil prices have already moved first. Brent crude once surged over 5%, approaching $110 per barrel, and WTI surpassed $103. Capital macroeconomists warn that if pipelines are severely damaged, oil prices could soar to $120. Bernstein is more direct—$150. For Bitcoin, the logic is clear: pipeline shutdowns → global supply gap→ oil prices surge→ inflation expectations are rising→ and pressure for FOMC rate hikes in September is increasing. BTC currently🔥 OP vs FIL: The Real Bullish Factors Worth Watching Recently
Lately, many people only focus on the price, but I pay more attention to the fundamental changes behind the two.
🟠 OP: Focus on "Value Capture"
Superchain continues to expand, and the biggest change is that revenue is now being fed back to OP through a buyback mechanism. The biggest pain point in the past was "chain growth ≠ token price increase," which is now gradually changing.
🟢 FIL: Focus on the "Supply-Demand Turning Point"
October 15 is a key date, as the vesting schedule ends and the pressure of new FIL supply is expected to drop significantly. At the same time, Filecoin is upgrading from pure "decentralized storage" to Onchain Cloud, data, and cloud infrastructure.
So my understanding is simple:
OP = Ethereum L2 ecosystem + buybacks
FIL = supply contraction + storage/cloud infrastructure
If the altcoin market recovers in September–October, OP might benefit from the L2 narrative, while FIL’s key focus should be whether supply-side changes can coincide with real demand growth.
One looks at ecosystem expansion, the other at supply-demand reversal.
I will continue to closely watch these two targets.📊9/15
BTC Technical Analysis Information
This round of rise was driven by expectations of ETF capital inflows and the decline in U.S. Treasury yields. After the price surged, the positive factors were realized, and funds took profits and exited. The current market has started to play the Fed speeches, repeated inflation data, cooling rate cut expectations, and no new major positive news, making it difficult for BTC to quickly surge again.
In the short term, it is in a high-level pullback and consolidation phase.
Long position opportunity: On a pullback near 76820, if the 1-hour K-line shows a long lower shadow / doji stabilization signal, and ETF funds no longer continue to flow out, consider buying the dip;
Short position opportunity: If a rebound near 78600 shows signs of stagnation, a short-term short can be tried; the current price is in the middle of the range, with room both up and down, so prioritize observation and wait for a combined signal from the market and news before taking action. #BTC现货ETF大额流入后转负 Term Structure Radar
$BTC annualized basis decreases with maturity: the near, mid, and far-term annualized basis are +5.40%/+4.82%/+4.76% respectively; the near-term contract's raw spread relative to the index is +$117.3. The near-term annualized basis is higher than the far-term, with higher annualized pricing concentrated near term.
$ETH annualized pricing at three maturities is not unidirectional: the near, mid, and far-term annualized basis are +2.41%/+4.36%/+3.97% respectively; the near-term contract's raw spread relative to the index is +$1.68.
$SOL annualized pricing at three maturities is not unidirectional: the near, mid, and far-term annualized basis are +4.58%/+1.51%/+1.85% respectively; the near-term contract's raw spread relative to the index is +$0.13.
BTC, ETH, SOL: all three maturities are in contango.
ETH, SOL: the mid-term maturity breaks the monotonic arrangement; the difference between near and far terms is insufficient to describe the entire curve. $CORE Why is it still not suitable to enter the market now?
1. Security and trust have been compromised
Previous validator vulnerabilities and emergency hard forks have proven that the protocol itself has security flaws. Security incidents will continue to reduce trust from institutions and large holders.
2. Large holders keep selling, and selling pressure has not clearly bottomed out
Unlock releases and early participants exiting, with frequent fixed-size sell orders in the market. Any rebound easily triggers selling pressure, forming a cycle of "rebound - sell - new low."
3. Ecosystem implementation falls short of expectations, competitors are very strong
Core products like SatPay have been in testing for a long time without large-scale commercial use; BTCFi projects like STX have already captured a lot of traffic, and CORE has not formed an irreplaceable advantage.
4. Exchange liquidity continues to shrink
Many platforms have successively delisted contracts and some spot trading pairs, causing liquidity to thin out. The worse the liquidity, the greater the slippage on price changes. Once the market reverses, selling may have no takers.
5. Large total token supply with a high circulating ratio
Maximum supply is 2.1 billion tokens, and the current circulation is already very high, with long-term inflationary selling pressure. Products like SatPay are still far from launch.
Pessimistic scenario (high probability): narrative continues to be disproven, product delays, exchanges continue to reduce trading pairs, large holders keep exiting, and price keeps hitting new lows.
If you want to do long-term value investing: it is currently not suitable, as fundamentals lack sufficient certainty.
If you only want to do short-term rebound speculation: position size must be kept extremely low, set exit criteria in advance, and do not hold on stubbornly for a long time. The higher the probability of a rate hike, the less I want to short Bitcoin here????
I reanalyzed the August CPI and PPI.
PPI year-on-year is 5.4%, CPI year-on-year is 3.4%. Just looking at these two numbers, the Fed raising rates by 25 basis points makes complete sense. But gasoline in the CPI rose 3.9% month-on-month, contributing more than one-third of the overall monthly increase, and the core CPI year-on-year actually dropped from 2.5% to 2.4%.
This indicates that inflation is indeed high, but a large part of the pressure this time comes from energy.
At the July meeting, three voting members already advocated for a rate hike. If the Fed really raises rates by 25 basis points in September, the market won’t be too surprised. What’s unclear now is whether they will continue to raise in October and whether the Fed will describe this action as the start of a new round of hikes.
As of my data check on September 15, BTC traded between 77378 and 79600 in 24 hours, ETH between 2488 and 2615. Both are fluctuating back and forth; the rate hike expectations are being priced in early, but the direction hasn’t been decided yet.
If the decision causes an initial drop but BTC can recover 77378 afterward, I will continue to expect an upward trend after consolidation. If it falls below and can’t recover, and the 10-year Treasury yield stays near 5%, then we need to be cautious about this round continuing downward.
For now, I’m not shorting.
$BTC $ETH
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Brothers!
Sunk costs should not be involved in major decisions.
I've advised others countless times on this, but when it comes to myself, I still fall into the trap.
First, a straightforward definition: money and time already lost and unrecoverable should not dictate your upcoming trades.
Yet most people fall right into this trap.
Holding onto losing positions without stop-loss, adding more as the price drops—on the surface, it looks like "averaging down," but deeper down, it's all the sunk cost fallacy. The problem lies in our decision-making focus: our eyes are fixed on "how to recover the lost money," rather than calmly calculating "whether this current position is still worth holding."
Does the market care about your cost basis? No.
Your purchase price only serves to remind you daily how much you've lost; it’s useless otherwise. Losses have already happened; they are a fact.
Continuing to hold or add positions is basically using new capital to fill an old hole that can’t be recovered.
So when it’s time to make a tough decision, just ask one question: looking forward, does this trade still have a favorable risk-reward ratio? Erase the losses already incurred from your mind.
If you need to cut losses, then cut losses. Admitting a loss and preserving your capital is much wiser than stubbornly holding on waiting to break even. Many people end up not breaking even but getting trapped even deeper.
Risk warning: This is only a personal insight and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency trading carries extremely high risk.
$BTC #AI发展焦虑升温，芯片股集体走弱 Bro, this chart puts the biggest current contradiction in the AI track right on the table.
On one side, the CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI are leading calls to slow down cutting-edge AI development to allow time for safety assessments and governance. On the other side, chip stocks immediately respond with sharp declines—NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel all falling across the board.
The market panic is straightforward: the fear is that if large model iteration slows, GPU demand and AI infrastructure investment will cool down accordingly. But look at what the industry side is doing—NVIDIA is still pushing CUDA-Q Logical, and data center and computing power investments remain at very high levels. They say they’re hitting the brakes, but their foot is still on the gas.
Essentially, this is a clash between “safety anxiety” and “capital return anxiety.” What the market fears most is not AI developing too fast, but that the giants suddenly realize the input-output return is unbalanced and start actively cutting capital expenditures. If that happens, the valuation logic for computing power, storage, and optical modules will have to be rewritten.
For us in the crypto circle, this is also part of the transmission chain. Bitcoin is currently mainly focused on the FOMC and rate cut expectations, but AI infrastructure itself is also an important force supporting tech stocks and risk appetite. If the AI sector enters a defensive mode, global capital pricing for high-tech and growth assets will become more cautious.
In the short term, watch for the Fed’s decision this week—don’t be scared by the chip stocks’ sharp drop. What really matters is the capital expenditure guidance from the leading big companies next, as that will be the core factor deciding whether the AI track can keep booming That spike last night was really glaring. From 76323 to 79569, over three thousand dollars, many short positions were instantly wiped out.
My first reaction was also to look for news: Did Trump say something? I checked thoroughly, no. He only expressed dissatisfaction with Google building a factory in Finland.
The real reason isn’t on Twitter, but in the bond market. The Treasury expanded long-term bond repurchases, Besant wanted to suppress yields, but the market interpreted it the opposite way, and long-end yields actually surged. The dollar weakened, shorts were forced to cover, and buying turned into a stampede.
Also, the bet on the CLARITY Act’s passage rate climbed from 14% to 28%, adding another reason.
So it wasn’t Trump driving the rally, but the Treasury and the shorts themselves.
I’m holding short positions myself, and saying this hurts my back. But JPMorgan’s statement last night must be acknowledged: blind shorting is extremely dangerous; if tensions in the Middle East ease or earnings exceed expectations, shorts will be squeezed and punished.
Tomorrow night is the CLARITY vote, the day after is the FOMC; until these two bombs are defused, I view all rebounds as short squeezes.
Jiang Zhuoer also said: if the vote fails, this rebound might just be the start of a pullback.
What do you think, is this a reversal or just a last flash of light for the bears?
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 BTC is repeatedly testing around 77K, and the KOLs in your group are shouting "buy the dip."
But you haven't thought through three questions clearly.
If you don't figure out these three questions, your operations this week will most likely be giving money to the market.
Question 1: Should you hold positions before the interest rate hike is finalized?
First, look at the numbers: CME shows the probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in September has soared to 92.4%.
Don't just focus on this number. You can't make money at 92%—the market has already priced in the "rate hike."
The real risk lies ahead.
HSBC expects the median rate forecast for the end of 2026 in the latest FOMC dot plot to reach 4.125%. TD Securities expects that after the Fed starts hiking in September, there will be three more hikes—one each in October and January next year. Deutsche Bank even expects a cumulative 75 basis points hike.
Pay attention to Waller. At his first FOMC meeting, the market priced in a 100% probability of a rate hike this year. Among 18 officials, 9 believe hikes will continue for the rest of the year.
In plain language: if the dot plot signals "more hikes to come," risk assets will face secondary pressure.
The rate hike itself is not the bomb. The dot plot is.
The advice is simple: don't heavily bet on any direction before the rate hike. De-leverage. Save your bullets.
Don't ask "will they hike or not?" Ask "will they continue hiking after the next hike?" That is the variable you need to trade.
Question 2: Is BTC 77K support or a trap?
BTC has retraced from the 81K high down to around 77K. Your first reaction is "buy the dip."
But first clarify—77K is a short-term battleground; 75K is the real line between life and death.
QCP Capital analysts point out that Bitcoin needs to hold support between $76,300 and $76,500. Intraday support is at $76,000–$76,500, with main resistance at $79,000–$82,000.
On-chain data is clearer: there is a large buy wall at $75,000. Once 75K breaks, the next liquidity dense zone is between $55,000 and $60,000.
Jiang Zhuoer said: $76,500 is key support (rising channel lower boundary + Fibonacci retracement). If it breaks effectively, the decline will accelerate.
In plain terms: if 75K holds, it's a correction; if 75K breaks, that's a crash.
Adding another layer: BTC is still below the 50-week moving average, and the rebound is limited within a narrow range between lower support and unbroken upper resistance.
This is a market without a clear direction. 77K is a bull trap zone, not a bottom-buying zone.
Question 3: Will the oil crisis transmit to crypto?
Yes. But the transmission may not be what you think.
Saudi Arabia's key oil pipeline has not recovered since the attack on September 10. Yanbu port inventories can only sustain exports for 5 to 7 days. The affected transport scale is up to about 4% of global oil supply.
Brent crude has already risen above $106. Bernstein analysts warn that with the combined crises in the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, Brent oil prices could surge to $120–$150.
Oil price → inflation → Fed → liquidity tightening. This path is already underway.
But here is a counterintuitive point.
Data from the Bank of America Research Institute shows that consumer card spending and retail growth are clearly cooling. This means—even if PPI and CPI rise passively due to oil costs—the root cause of inflation looks more like a supply shock rather than overheated demand.
What the Fed really fears is not the oil price itself. It fears oil prices turning from a one-time shock into a second-round transmission through service prices, wages, and inflation expectations.
So the impact of oil prices on crypto is not immediate; it is chronic and lagging.
Transmission path: oil price → inflation → Fed → liquidity. Currently in the "Fed pricing in" stage.
What about the funding side?
Last week, BTC ETFs saw net outflows for three consecutive weeks, ending the previous three-week inflow streak. BTC ETF total assets fell below $100 billion.
Funds are withdrawing. Until ETFs see net inflows for more than two consecutive days, any rebound without funding support is just nonsense.
Three questions answered. Conclusion?
Before the above signals appear, BTC is more likely to maintain a 75K–82K range oscillation, suitable for high sell and low buy, not chasing highs or cutting losses.
$BTC $BZ $CL #沙特关键输油管道受损，或停运数周 Late-night capital flows reveal a signal: large positions are treating $BNB as a temporary safe haven. Around $727, it has risen 27% in a month, with the smallest pullback among major coins. Behind this is Binance's regular token burn and ongoing on-chain ecosystem support. If volume increases near the previous high around $733, the upside space will truly open. Its role is not explosive but stable.
$HYPE at $79.66 has fallen from $89.65, and the story is not over yet. The mechanism of using 97% of protocol revenue for buybacks is real, but revenue has declined for four consecutive quarters. $77.5 is a key support line. Today's nearly 1% rise against the trend indicates funds are willing to buy here. $UNI at $6.05, with a market cap of 3.7 billion, is a long-standing DeFi leader in a prolonged sideways trend. Its narrative is being diverted by L2 and meme tokens, neither falling nor rising, waiting like a blue chip for the right moment.
The logic of the three is different: $BNB seeks stability, $HYPE bets on buybacks and oversold recovery, $UNI waits for rotation. Late-night position management requires first clarifying which type you hold. Risk reminder: The above is market observation and does not constitute investment advice. Crypto assets are highly volatile; please make independent judgments.BTC has already pulled back from around $60,000, but the market doesn't seem to truly believe it yet.
In the past two weeks, BTC has rebounded from the low near $60,000 at the end of August to above $70,000.
But interestingly, market sentiment hasn't strengthened in sync.
On one side:
ETF funds are flowing back in, and the options market is starting to bet on above $80,000 by the end of the year.
On the other side:
Oil prices are surging again, U.S. Treasury yields have risen to around 5%, and the market has priced in about 90% of the Federal Reserve's rate hikes.
This makes BTC's current position quite interesting.
If the macro environment is this bad and it can still hold up, that suggests there might really be funds accumulating below.
But if it can't even hold above $70,000, then this recent rebound might just be an emotional correction.
So right now, I'm less concerned about whether it's a bull or bear market.
What I want to see more is:
In such a poor macro environment, can BTC continue not to fall?
Sometimes, true strength isn't a sharp rise.
It's when it refuses to fall when it should.$CP I don't feel any sense of achievement from making this money; it's pure luck. I didn't even watch the market, and when I checked back, hmm? When did this happen? 😅
During the bottom consolidation, I noticed strong selling pressure, insufficient support, low trading volume, and every rebound was weak. That kind of movement, with no one catching the rise, my judgment was to short.
From 0.03914 down to 0.01291, the short position yield was +1340.31%. Feels good, brothers. This profit was satisfying, not wasted waiting; those on board should be waking up smiling. 🔥
Take the big chunk into your pocket first, close 80% of the position, keep 20% to protect the cost price, let the profits run if it continues to drop, and don't give back profits if it rebounds.
Have a strategy before the market opens, discipline during trading, and reflection afterward. Even if you only make one point, as long as you take it away, it's yours; floating profits, no matter how much, belong to the market.
For friends who haven't entered yet, listen to me: now is not the time to chase shorts. Wait for a more comfortable position in the next round and patiently await good news. The market is not short of opportunities, it lacks patience.
$BTC $SOL