Orbit Post Sitemap
COIN jumped while crypto breadth stayed thin. $HYPE still sits on the perp book. $OKB is the other venue token. Listed equity, on-chain derivatives, CEX float. That is how TradFi trades this vote.#Saudi Arabia's key oil pipeline damaged, may be out of operation for weeks
On September 10, drone attacks targeted the Riyadh and Medina sections, and Saudi Arabia preemptively shut down the entire East-West pipeline on the 11th. This 1,200-kilometer pipeline transports 7 million barrels per day and is Saudi Arabia's only alternative route bypassing the Strait of Hormuz to export from the Yanbu port on the Red Sea. Two regional officials revealed that repairs to the pipeline and pumping stations are expected to take 3 to 5 weeks.
This means Yanbu port's inventory can only support exports for 5 to 7 days; if the pipeline is not repaired, Saudi Arabia's Red Sea exports will soon be depleted.
Brent crude rose to $106 on Tuesday, gaining as much as 5% intraday; WTI reached $103. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield broke above 5.012% intraday, the first time since October 2023. CME data shows the probability of a rate hike in September has surged to between 86% and 94%.
BTC fell to $76,718, with a weekly decline of 4.4%, and Ethereum dropped to $2,478. The surge in oil prices did not trigger BTC's safe-haven attribute; instead, it reinforced rate hike expectations, constituting an indirect bearish factor.There has been quite a lot of news this week: the Federal Reserve is going to raise interest rates, Japan is going to raise interest rates, the European Central Bank is going to raise interest rates, and the Clear Act is being finalized.
I've been waiting to short after the pump; I shorted at 2580, and several take-profit points at 2530, 2500, and 2460 have all been reached. For BTC, some short positions at 793, breaking 780 reached 770-765, which have also been hit.
Relatively speaking, with high expectations of rate hikes, looking for highs to short is also feasible. After all, the 90% expectation is set, which has some influence on the market, with a bit more risk-averse sentiment among funds.
Back to the market, the current price moves up and down repeatedly but hasn't changed the structure; it's just a range-bound oscillation. To put it plainly, has BTC broken below 760? Has Ethereum broken below 2350? Obviously not, so why say the structure has changed?
Assuming that after all these negative factors land this week, the price still fails to break through or no panic selling occurs, that would be the best opportunity. This round of highs will be refreshed once again.
Before any trend change, my personal approach remains short-term shorts and long-term longs. Everyone has different ideas, so just follow your own thinking.
$BTC $ETH $SOL #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ 😮💨 Is this market deliberately trying to wear people down?
$BTC is currently fluctuating repeatedly between $76,900 and $78,200, sweeping back and forth within a few hundred points. Chasing the rise is easy to get hit, and chasing the dip is also easy to be pulled back.
$ETH and $ZEC occasionally pop up, $OKB and $NDKB have also started to show rebound actions. The market feels like it’s about to "break through" everywhere, but the real direction hasn’t emerged yet.
More importantly, the Federal Reserve’s September 16 meeting + related progress on the US CLARITY Act are all concentrated in these few days. The market is clearly waiting for the news to land, and BTC’s short-term volatility may further increase.
My current approach remains cautious:
🔹 $ETH: Watch for short opportunities near 2580, target 2460
🔹 $ZEC: Continue to observe pressure above 1180, target around 1080
What I fear most now is not the lack of market movement, but the continuous false breakouts in this volatility, cutting back and forth.
⚠️ This is only a personal market view and does not constitute investment advice. Risks are higher during volatile periods, so please manage your risk carefully. SOXL rebounds strongly! But I missed the best buying point because I was busy, and I really regret chasing this rally!
The market finally saw a strong breakout after defending the $100 level! SOXL is currently priced at 104.38, with a daily gain of +1.03%.
I had previously posted a reminder to wait for the right side, but I had to step away from the screen unexpectedly. When I came back, I saw a big bullish candle breaking through the 103.34 resistance with volume. I was kicking myself for perfectly missing the most comfortable base position buy zone between 100-102, and had to hurriedly chase a 10x long position around 103.34. Currently, the unrealized profit is +10.37%. Although I made some gains, I’m full of regret for not executing my plan well.
Looking at the 15-minute chart, the moving averages are in a bullish alignment, MACD is above zero with a golden cross and expanding red bars (0.74), SAR support has moved up to 101.20, and short-term bullish sentiment is strong.
But because I entered at a relatively high price, the margin for error is greatly reduced. The next strategy: raise the stop-loss line to protect profits first, with resistance expected at 106.
A painful lesson: trading really requires full attention. Missing the precise right-side buying point and chasing higher compromises both mindset and position cost. Everyone, please don’t follow my example—better to miss out than to chase recklessly. Control your hands!The mainnet triples the transaction space, but the market only rewards 0.13%: SOL first holds 99.22 before discussing a rebound
An hour ago, Solana mainnet raised the single transaction limit to 4,096 bytes, more than triple, yet $SOL only moved 0.13%. The direction is clear: no short-term chasing of longs; if the rebound can't surpass 101.76, the bias is bearish.
V1 transaction format is implemented together: metadata is written directly into the transaction, saving extra account costs, and the failure rate of complex transactions is also reduced. But infrastructure benefits depend on ecosystem execution; it's not a one-candle event.
The market just doesn't believe this. Multi-timeframe signals are bearish, 1h SAR flips above 101.76 to suppress price, daily MACD has been in a zero-level death cross for 10 days; the mainstream long-to-short ratio is 2.45, crossing the 2.2 crowding line; $BTC is also closing lower, the market gives no tailwind.
Resistance above: 101.76 (1h SAR) → 104.82 (24h high)
Support below: 99.22 (4h SAR) → 97.82 (daily MA30)
Watershed level: 101.76. Only with volume pushing back above will the event logic take over.
For those still holding longs, reduce positions if the rebound fails to break 101.76; clear positions if it breaks below 99.22; for those looking to enter, place orders below 99.22, stop loss if it breaks 97.82. Likes are my energy for monitoring the market, follow to stay on track.
$SOL $BTCAt 10 PM, outsiders saw the hearing as the international financial system, while insiders focused on one thing: how the Ministry of Finance planned to issue bonds.
The theme is broad, but what truly influences the market is the issuance rhythm and whether there are new statements about the buyback plan.
If the tone leans toward suppressing the deficit, the upward pressure on U.S. Treasury yields may ease; If expansion continues, yields will have to push higher.
I tend to believe this time is more like paving the way for subsequent bond issuance, rather than actually turning to tightening.
After all, fiscal funds are not spent out of thin air; it's just another way to put it.
For the crypto world, U.S. Treasury yields are an invisible rope—tight or loose is not up to us.
So tonight, are you focusing on yields, or Becent's wording?
#10年期美债收益率突破5%
#本周FOMC揭晓, can the rate hike materialize? #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4 $500 million $BTC Being out of position is the most comfortable stance before the FOMC.
Brothers, I am now completely out of position.
The SOL long position suffered a floating loss of -157%, it was too exhausting to hold, and I finally closed it all near 99. The 50x short position on ZEC was also taken profit and exited, making a small gain as a hedge. Overall, this week was still a loss, but at least I don’t have to stare at the screen and lose sleep anymore.
After being out of position, my mindset when watching the market is completely different.
When I held positions before, every 15-minute candlestick felt like cutting flesh. When it rose, I feared a pullback; when it fell, I feared liquidation. Now being out of position, when BTC dropped from 79,500 to 77,200, I can calmly watch the show.
Why choose to be out of position?
The day after tomorrow at 2:00 AM on September 17 is the FOMC. The market prices in nearly a 90% chance of a rate hike, so whether it happens or not is basically no suspense. But what the dot plot will say and what Powell will say at the press conference is completely unpredictable.
Holding positions at such times is gambling. If you guess right, you make a profit; if wrong, you lose everything. I already lost a lot last week on the SOL long position and don’t want to fall into the same trap again.
What am I waiting for after being out of position?
First scenario: The dot plot is hawkish, indicating more rate hikes this year.
BTC will likely test 76,000 or even 75,500, and SOL might drop below 95. At that time, don’t rush to bottom fish; wait for the market panic to subside and for volume-supported stabilization signals before considering.
Second scenario: The dot plot is dovish, suggesting the rate hike cycle is nearing its end.
BTC might quickly rebound above 80,000, and SOL will follow up to 105-107. Even then, don’t rush to chase; wait for a pullback confirmation before entering.
Third scenario: After the data release, the market fluctuates and grinds back and forth.
The rate hike happens but the dot plot is unclear; the market rises, falls, then rises again, washing out positions repeatedly. This is the most frustrating, but the advantage of being out of position is that you can wait—wait until the washout finishes and the direction becomes clear before acting.
Plan for the next two days:
Before the FOMC, continue to stay out of position. Watch the market, review, and wait for signals.
If you really can’t resist, use a very small position (like 5-10U) to test a direction with a very tight stop loss. But this is purely for entertainment, not serious trading.
Being out of position is not doing nothing; it’s waiting for the best opportunity to act. Brothers, for this FOMC, are you out of position or holding through? Let’s discuss in the comments👇#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $BTC I’m watching $RE /USDT near 0.003691 after a sharp drop. Price remains below MA60 at 0.003715. I’d like to see 0.003707 reclaimed first, with 0.003715 and 0.003731 as visible targets. Losing 0.003671 would invalidate this bounce setup for me.$DASH Was anxious last night, but woke up this morning realizing the anxiety was unnecessary, just wasted worry.
Last glance before bed last night, DASH lacked support, volume didn’t keep up, clear resistance above. I signaled bearish, kept the short position open, moved the stop loss closer to the cost price to keep myself comfortable.
Opened the market this morning, from 67.88 down to 53.44, +1065.85% already gave the answer, big profit. The earlier hesitation was real, but the outcome is truly rewarding.
Don’t lose patience in the consolidation, then try to regain dignity in a one-sided move.
First close 80%, protect the remaining 20% at cost price. If it continues to drop, let the profits run; if it rebounds, don’t give back the profits, don’t be greedy for the last bit.
Have a strategy before the market opens, discipline during trading, and reflection after.
For friends who haven’t entered yet, listen to me: now is not the time to rush, wait for the next opportunity, I will notify immediately. There are still chances, don’t be anxious.
$SOL $ADA Trump accepts the revised crypto ethics compromise clause, the CLARITY Act is approaching the procedural Senate vote on September 15, requiring 60 votes to break through the lengthy debate. BTC holds steady above 80,000 with fluctuations, ETH maintains 2,500, while high-beta altcoins like SOL lag behind the broader market.
On the surface, it looks like a broad rally, but the real issue lies in the structure. The money driving this rally is short-term event-driven capital, not a comprehensive risk appetite recovery. The evidence is in the altcoins—if the market were truly warming up, high-beta assets should be leading the charge, but they are falling behind. All funds are crowded into the most liquid BTC, which is a defensive posture, not an offensive one.
This is not the start of a bull market; it is a defensive rebound driven by events. Capital is betting on the bill's benefits, but the way they bet is by holding tightly to BTC, not spreading out. Structure explains the situation better than price.
The same pattern appeared during the 2023 ETF expectations period. BTC moved first, ETH followed, altcoins remained still. The market shouted "bull market is here," but the price surged then fell back. A true broad rally happens when capital dares to rush into high-beta assets. Altcoins not falling behind is the real sign of risk appetite warming.
The bill is a catalyst, but a catalyst is not a trend. $BTC's 80,000 and $ETH's 2,500 are key levels; holding them is a game, breaking through is the signal. Altcoin weakness indicates this round is still event-driven, not a full bull market.
Pay attention to two things: the voting result and whether altcoins can keep up. If BTC holds 80,000 and ETH holds 2,500, you can participate lightly; if altcoins continue to lag, don't mistake the rebound for a trend. Don't chase highs, don't go heavy, wait for structural confirmation.
#CLARITY投票前分歧未解 The current capital flow in the crypto market reveals a rotation logic different from before. Bitcoin repeatedly struggles below $77,000, with the dual pressure of the FOMC meeting and regulatory drafts causing high-leverage positions to be cleared first. But if you only focus on BTC's sideways movement, you might miss a more important signal: ETF capital flow shows continuous net outflow from BTC, while ETH is attracting funds against the trend. Institutions are not exiting but adjusting their portfolio structure.
The market language can be broken down as follows:
$BTC has transformed from a "weather vane" to a "stress tester."
It no longer leads the charge but verifies the market's resilience. Holding steady below $77,000 without breaking is itself a sign of strength. Its role has shifted from an anchor to a test of endurance; defending key levels is a phase victory.
$ETH is being repriced by the triple narratives of compliance, staking, and deflation.
It is more resilient than BTC during downturns and more elastic when sentiment warms. The willingness of capital to position against the trend in ETH indicates institutions are betting on a shift in the leading narrative cycle.
There is no need to rush to call a "bull return" right now. A more accurate description is: BTC defends the bottom line, ETH grabs the narrative, and HYPE bets on the heartbeat. Smart money has not retreated; it is just rotating positions and switching horses.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #AI发展焦虑升温，芯片股集体走弱 #沙特关键输油管道受损，或停运数周 PONS and PUMP are both tokens of permissionless token launch platforms, but their ecological foundations and narratives differ.
PUMP is the native token of Solana's veteran launch platform shturl.c. Since 2024, it has led the on-chain Meme wave, enduring multiple bull and bear cycles with a deeply rooted community. The platform continuously uses its revenue to buy back and burn PUMP, relying on Solana's vast Meme ecosystem, with the token price fluctuating alongside the on-chain token issuance activity.
$PONS is the new platform token of Robinhood Chain, focusing on a US stock-mapped Meme narrative and supporting token issuance paired with stock assets. 80% of protocol fees are used for buyback and burn. Although it has been launched for a short time, it has quickly surged in protocol fees due to its unique real asset narrative.
Both rely on platform fees to support their tokens, but the veteran has a mature ecological foundation while the newcomer holds a differentiated narrative. Their market performance is highly tied to on-chain activity.#汇丰上调SpaceX目标价，长期估值分歧加剧
HSBC raised SpaceX's target price from 115 to 150, closing at 148.15 that day.
▪️ Raised by 30%, implied upside only 1.2%, still a hold
▪️ When first set at 115 in July, the stock price was 118, consistently trading below
▪️ Vy Capital holds 40 billion, predicts 5–7 years to break 10 trillion
▪️ Morgan Stanley sets 300, expects cash flow positive by 2035
The disagreement isn't about the value. Those calling for 10 trillion have 40 billion out of a 50 billion position on this bet; those saying it's expensive hold none. Last year's revenue was 18.7 billion, with a price-to-sales ratio of 107.
BTC: No cash flow, still below the ETF cost line of 86,000. The disagreement isn't about fundamentals, but about who will pay.
Do you price it at 150 or 300? Goldman Sachs remains optimistic about $XAU, and I personally am also bullish; although $XAU does not yield interest, the market won't end so quickly, with oil being the key factor.
There is a net upside risk bias for $XAU, with increased two-way volatility in its path. This judgment is based on the assumption of central banks purchasing about 50 tons of gold per month, dropping to about 40 tons per month by 2027, combined with a recovery in private ETF demand, assuming the Federal Reserve holds steady without rate hikes in 2026. In the medium term, geopolitical tensions drive diversification, pushing the upside risk skew of $XAU upward. If the Fed turns to raising rates, $XAU will face correction pressure but may still remain above current levels. The downside is supported by central bank buying, making the bottom more solid than in previous cycles, with central banks providing substantial price support.
Risk Warning
Attention is needed on: Fed rate hikes triggering hedge unwinding and ETF sell-offs, causing $XAU corrections; slowing central bank gold purchase pace weakening support; easing geopolitical tensions reducing diversification demand; unexpected rises in the dollar and real interest rates suppressing non-yielding assets; option position reversals amplifying volatility. Any significant movement in these variables will alter $XAU's medium-term trajectory. The bullish thesis depends on uninterrupted central bank buying and ETF inflows; if interrupted, the optimistic outlook must be reassessed.
$XAU
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Still don't get it?
The super week is approaching, and the market has given a little sweetener first.
Altcoins are turning green against the trend, but it's not spring—it's bait. Volume hasn't expanded, funds haven't flowed back, and you expect to change your whole perspective just from one bullish candle? $USELESS bounced from 0.192 to 0.212, but most of those shouting reversal have forgotten how it fell before.
The moving averages are still in a bearish alignment, with MA5, MA10, and MA20 pressing down. This kind of rebound is just a bump on the way down, not a turnaround. Whoever treats this as a starting point for a rise is likely standing on the peak, exposed to the wind.
Retail investors are adding longs, fees are turning positive, and open interest is piling up. The more crowded it gets, the harsher the stampede. The main players want to exit, but someone has to take over first. The super week is not a week of broad gains; it's a week of volatility cleansing. Before the news lands, all strength might be an illusion; after the news, the weak will be exposed.
Don't mistake an escape wave for a reversal, don't take the bait from the whales as a trend. A rebound in a downtrend only serves to get people on board, not to get them safely ashore.
The best move now is to watch it play out and wait for it to tire. Once the sentiment dissipates, the waterfall will naturally come.
$ETH $BTC
#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 Last night, gold dipped to a low of 4254, just 14cm away from the 4240 I mentioned.
Then it followed the rebound of US tech AI stocks to 4317. After facing pressure and falling back in the morning, it attempted to break 4317 again but was blocked. Even with the long-term US Treasury yields soaring, gold no longer rose along but instead faced pressure.
This is completely opposite to the gold safe-haven sentiment triggered by the US Treasury credit crisis, indicating that the US Treasury market has completed its repricing, and gold can no longer rely solely on the "US dollar credit issue" narrative.
If the US dollar index continues to rise, gold will still have some downside room.
New resistance at the hourly level is 4320, with new support at 4220 At this point, with a 92.5% probability of a rate hike by the CME, there shouldn't be anyone still holding onto the fantasy that there won't be a rate hike, right? To put it simply, if at 2 a.m. on the 17th there really is no rate hike, that's when you should immediately liquidate and run. Rate hikes aren't scary; it's the sudden decision not to hike that's terrifying.
In fact, since last week when oil prices started dominating the market, we've had to shift to betting on whether rate hikes will be consecutive.
And this issue will completely explode once the rate hike is implemented but oil prices don't fall back.
So if there are still highs in the next few days, it might be another escape window. Don't entertain any illusions about new highs. Structurally, it's really not supported; at the very least, oil prices need to substantially retreat before a new round of market activity can begin. The timing still points to October. $CL #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #ETH #BTC #ETF
🟠 Spot Bitcoin ETFs returned to inflows on Monday, attracting $160 million after four consecutive days of outflows totaling $463 million. Ethereum ETFs attracted $121 million on the same day.
According to Bitfinex Alpha, the increased demand for Ethereum ETFs is partly explained by traders using positions in them as collateral for CME futures trades to generate income.At the 19:00 close, ETH squeezed in first, while BTC was still at the door. But I want to break down the phrase "volume doubled."
From 18:00 to 19:00 Beijing time on September 15, OKX spot ETH closed at 2483.85, surpassing the previous hour's high of 2480.53; the volume was 2.43 times that of the previous hour.
However, the previous hour was quite quiet. Compared to 16:00–17:00, this time ETH's volume only increased by about 6%. Returning from "whispering" to normal volume cannot be directly labeled as "massive launch."
BTC touched 77172 during the session but closed back at 77050.1, not staying above the previous hour's high of 77060.2; OKX volume basically remained unchanged. By 19:04, BTC returned to 77104.9, but the new hour had not yet closed.
I acknowledge ETH's relative strength in this hour, but that doesn't mean it will continue to lead. If the subsequent close falls back below 2480.53, the significance of this breakthrough will be discounted; only if it holds after a pullback is it worth further discussion.
The latest complete 12:00–16:00 four-hour candle still shows both coins' highs and lows lower than the previous candle; 16:00–20:00 has not yet closed. Hourly improvements cannot be prematurely interpreted as a major cycle turnaround.
Data as of 19:04 Beijing time, all based on OKX USDT spot data.
For informational purposes only, not investment advice. $BCH This profit makes me feel both honored and fearful, afraid that tomorrow I'll realize it and get blocked.😅
Just after lunch when I checked the market, BCH had another symbolic rebound on BCH, but the follow-through was insufficient, and the volume ratio was even smaller than in the morning. I've seen this kind of rebound too many times; frankly, it's just giving shorts a position. Seeing the bearish signal, I directly took action to short.
Being out of position isn't a sin; opening positions recklessly is the mistake.
The result gave the answer. From 231.7 to 221.9, the short position gained +211.48%. Hitting the rhythm perfectly really feels great.
You need a strategy before the market, discipline during, and reflection after.
First, take 80% profit off the table, then move the stop loss for the remaining 20% to the break-even point. If it continues to drop, let the profit run; don't give it back.
For friends who haven't entered yet, listen to me: the opportunity is still there, don't rush. The cost-effectiveness of chasing shorts now is very low. Wait patiently for a good signal, then act on the next wave.
$ETH $BTC Even if CLARITY passes the vote, will BTC suddenly gain an additional commodity certificate???
I reviewed the documents released by the SEC and CFTC this year and found that many people have exaggerated the impact of this bill.
On March 17 this year, the SEC and CFTC issued a joint interpretation, already listing BTC and ETH as examples of digital commodities.
In other words, when the market discusses CLARITY today, the commodity attributes of BTC and ETH are not starting from zero. U.S. regulators have already given a fairly clear stance.
So what use does this bill have?
Regulatory explanations will adjust with changes in chairpersons and government. If legislation is completed, it can codify the division of responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC into law, while also stipulating project disclosures, compliance responsibilities of centralized intermediaries, and the scope of protections for developers and peer-to-peer activities.
Institutions fear rules changing every four years the most.
For BTC, the commodity attribute has long been accepted by the market; the new changes brought by the bill may not be as intense as imagined. ETH and application-layer projects involve staking, token issuance, and on-chain services; whether the rules can remain stable long-term will have a more direct impact.
Therefore, after the bill news comes out, I will specifically watch whether ETH can outperform BTC.
If CLARITY progresses smoothly and ETH continues to weaken relative to BTC, it indicates that funds only see it as a political development. Only if ETH starts to gain volume and outperform BTC will the bill's impact possibly enter asset pricing.
#特朗普接受新版伦理条款，CLARITY投票临近 The market is playing out a counterintuitive scenario: the probability of a rate hike is nearly hitting 90%, yet cryptocurrency prices seem to ignore this and continue to rise. $BTC, $ETH, and $ZEC are collectively moving against the trend, not because the market is crazy, but because expectations have been overanalyzed, and the bears have become the fuel for the rally.
The CME FedWatch tool has priced in over an 87% chance of a 25 basis point rate hike in September, which is almost an official announcement. When something is priced in to this extent, it ceases to be a "surprise" and becomes "background noise." The real danger lies with short-term funds that have heavily shorted, betting on negative outcomes—they think they are hedging risk, but in reality, they are supplying ammunition to the main players.
Derivatives trading volume surged before the FOMC, with long and short positions crowded together. Volume never indicates direction; it only reflects crowd density. Once the price moves in the wrong direction, the crowded side will be forced to liquidate, triggering a chain squeeze. A price rally is precisely the easiest way to clear out short positions.
Key levels to watch before the decision:
· $BTC: Resistance zone at 81,000-82,152, support at 75,000; if lost, look to 73,900
· $ETH: Resistance at 2,600-2,660, support must hold at 2,502 to be stable; if broken, look to 2,480
· $ZEC: Resistance zone at 1,092-1,198, support zone at 1,089-1,102
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #CLARITY投票前分歧未解 Coverage: Gold · Crude Oil · AI Storage Chips · AI Industry · Crypto Market | Data as of US Eastern Close on September 14 (Monday), Beijing Time September 15 13:30 Draft 1. Key Points 1. AI slowdown theory slams global chip stocks: Anthropic CEO Amodei called for slowing AI model iteration, OpenAI and xAI leaders echoed the call, and Altman explicitly stated no IPO in 2026. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 5.86% (the largest single-day drop since July), and Nvidia lost about $176.6 billion in market value overnight. Meaning: The three AI giants themselves said "running too fast, need to brake," and the market immediately doubted future chip order growth, preemptively selling off. 2. The US 10-year Treasury yield broke through 5% intraday for the first time since October 2023; CME data shows a 92.4% probability of a 25 basis point Fed rate hike this week. Simply put: A risk-free rate hitting 5% means holding government bonds yields 5% return doing nothing, reducing the attractiveness of stocks, gold, and crypto. 3. Oil prices continue above $100: Houthi forces disabled Saudi Arabia's east-west oil pipeline (7 million barrels per day) last Friday, and on Monday launched missile attacks on a Saudi airbase. WTI closed at $101.39, Brent at $105.68, with Brent intraday spiking to $109.8; after Trump said "Iran wants to negotiate," gains narrowed. Meaning: The only land route bypassing the Strait of Hormuz was bombed and stopped, affecting about 4 million barrels globallyDogecoin is the most honest barometer in this wave of pessimism; it is sensitive to sentiment and often leads the market in turning trends. Currently, the clear bill vote and the Federal Reserve interest rate have become two heavy stones pressing down on the market, with traders' attitudes converging: the bill won't reach 60 votes, and the Fed only has rate hikes left. Dogecoin's silence is a reflection of this consensus pricing.
But once the bad news is priced in, the script changes. Positions, options, and funding rates are all arranged for the worst-case scenario. The bill's rejection only confirms the fact; securing key votes would be incremental; the rate hike is a realization, and standing still becomes a surprise. Bears need new negative news to survive, but the fuel for the downside has already burned out.
$DOGE is not valued by cash flow but by consensus and hype; it cools first in pessimism and heats up first when expectations reverse. Regardless of the voting outcome, the market now faces only two scenarios: as expected or better than expected.
The smart move is to wait for the shoe to drop, not to guess what's inside the shoe. The days when pessimists were right are over; from now on, stand with the odds, and Dogecoin is often the first to move when the odds pay off. ETH Evening Core Logic · Key Levels: 2487 / 2459, volume is king, don't trust breakouts without volume, don't hold losses. · Long: Break above 2487 with volume on the right side to chase longs, hourly close above 2487 targets 2515-2537. · Short: Break below 2459 with volume on the right side to chase shorts, 4-hour break below 2459 targets 2405-2357. · Structure: The ascending trendline and pullback support have both been lost, now holding hard at 2454. If 2454 breaks, the equal distance target is 2410; 2410 is the bottom of the hourly consolidation box, breaking it means a full collapse, directly targeting 2281. · Best Scenario: Sideways oscillation above 2454. Once 2410 breaks, it's a waterfall drop, don't catch falling knives. · News: Early morning crypto clarity bill vote; if passed, it may rally, if not, continue to fall, don't gamble, watch the chart. BTC Evening Core Logic · The pullback is not over. The hammer at 76661 was bought, but support doesn't mean stability; bottom fishing on the left side is likely mid-mountain, most likely will retest 76003. · Confirming support validity: At this level, if two or three more candles don't break 76661, or if broken quickly recovers; or if volume breaks through the 77504-76661 box with a big bullish candle/morning star, then a rebound is confirmed. · No rush to be bullish: The first rebound had two big bullish candles, the second had a small bullish candle with a lower high, the rhythm is off unless the second wave makes a higher high. · To stop falling, price needs to return above 77002; for a rebound, break above 77493, targeting 78001-78521. If it can't get above 77493, it will move sideways without falling.The market tried to break higher, but sellers quickly stepped back in. ₿ BTC pushed toward $79.2K before slipping back into the $77K–$78K region. ⟠ ETH reclaimed $2.60K, but momentum faded and price returned toward $2.50K. ◎ SOL remains the weaker major, struggling around the $100–$103 area. This looks less like a clean breakout and more like a liquidity sweep ahead of the Fed decision. Short-term traders are getting shaken out on both sides while larger players wait for the macro trigger. RecenThe CLARITY bill will be procedurally voted to the Senate tonight, with a threshold of 60 votes. The Republicans have 53 seats and must snatch votes from the Democratic side. Trump has accepted most of the new code of ethics, but some Democrats feel it's still not enough. Banking lobbying groups are still opposing it.
Most people see this vote as the grand finale, but in reality, it's just the beginning. The 60-vote threshold is in the hands of the Democrats, and the Republicans themselves are not united in stone. Even if it passes tonight, there will still be full house debates, amendment negotiations, and House version adjustments, and legislative time is running out. The market's understanding of "passing" is far from Washington's actual progress.
Tonight is likely to be evenly split, leaning toward optimism, but far less stable than the market expects. If it passes, it's sentiment boosting; if it falls, it's sentiment crashing—both sides could experience sharp fluctuations.
During the 2023 ETF anticipation period, every few weeks there was a "major development," each time hailed as the starting point of a bull market, only to repeatedly spike and then retreat. The real start came after approval, not during the expected phase.
The core contradiction is the mismatch between short-term political maneuvering and long-term legislative reality. Don't mistake optimism for certainty.
Watch the voting results, and also watch whether the knockoffs follow. If it passes, $BTC might hit over 80,000, but don't chase highs; If it loses, pull back to 72,000 to 76,000 to see if there's any support. Whatever the outcome, don't bet heavily in advance.
#CLARITY投票前分歧未解 $ETH US Treasury yields break 5.03%, hitting a new high since 2007! Japanese 30-year bonds at highest level, Bank of England slams the brakes, Bitcoin battles to hold 77,000
Brothers, the global bond market is completely out of control.
USA: The 10-year Treasury yield broke through 5% intraday, reaching a high of 5.033%, the highest since mid-2007. The 30-year yield also surged to 5.39%, rising across the board. The market prices in an 87% chance of a rate hike in September. At 22:00 tonight, the testimony of Basset is a new signal closely watched by the US bond market.
Japan: The 10-year government bond yield is approaching 3%, a 30-year high since 1996. The expectation of a rate hike in September exceeds 90%. Once implemented, it will trigger a global unwind of yen carry trades.
UK: Even more extreme—the Bank of England is preparing to directly stop selling 20- and 30-year government bonds accumulated during the financial crisis. Due to soaring borrowing costs, selling long bonds since 2022 has already cost taxpayers £22 billion, prompting an emergency brake.
My judgment: This is not a problem of a single country; it is a global sovereign credit repricing. Middle East oil prices push inflation higher, central bank rate hike expectations heat up, fiscal deficits expand, and long bond buyers exit—the three reasons erupt simultaneously. Bitcoin is fighting hard around 77,000; if yen carry trade unwinds combined with soaring US bonds cause a liquidity shock, once 76,000 breaks, 72,000 will be the next level to watch.
Strategy: Don’t bet on direction before the FOMC decision. Wait for Wash’s statement; if it hints at continued rate hikes, reduce positions immediately.
#10年期美债收益率突破5% $BTC remains the core barometer of the short-term market, with prices fluctuating around $77.9K; $ETH remains above $2.5K, while $SOL is still vying for direction near $100. What truly deserves attention this time is not just price, but whether price + volume + Open Interest (open interest) are synchronized. If BTC holds steady and ETH/SOL shows stronger volume and momentum following, it indicates increased capital participation; If BTC remains relatively stable but ETH/SOL continues to weaken BTC, it may be a localized rebound, with funds still leaning defensively. 📌 Current key zones: BTC → $77K support, $80K as important resistance; ETH → $2.45K–$2.50K as a key pivot; SOL → $98–$100 is a key short-term defense zone 🔥. BTC holds steady + ETH/SOL synchronized strengthening→ may see broader expansion ⚠️. BTC stabilizes + ETH/SOL continues to diverge. → is more likely to be narrow strength. Additionally, today the market faces a key procedural vote on the US CLARITY Act in the Senate, and tomorrow the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision. Macroeconomic and regulatory catalysts may amplify short-term volatility. BTC determines market structure ETHEveryone is watching the Strait of Hormuz, but Pharaoh says there’s another energy risk the market cannot ignore. ⚠️ Saudi Arabia’s East-West oil pipeline—a critical route connecting the kingdom’s eastern oil fields with the Red Sea port of Yanbu—has been shut after drone attacks damaged key infrastructure. This isn’t just another pipeline. The 1,200-km route has recently carried roughly 4–5 million barrels per day, representing around 4–5% of global oil supply and providing Saudi Arabia with anTokenized markets can trade around the clock; credible valuation has to keep up.
S&P Global leading the investment that brings Kaiko's Series B to $110M puts the data layer in focus. My read: institutional backing could help close that gap, but scale will depend on whether pricing standards remain open to competition. Shared infrastructure and concentrated pricing power can grow together.
#SPGlobalLeadsKaikoRound Lin Chong, nicknamed Leopard Head, is highly skilled and originally seeks peace. When oppressed, he initially retreats step by step, clinging to luck, always hoping the situation will resolve itself without taking initiative to break the deadlock. Only when all escape routes are destroyed and trapped in a desperate situation does he rise to resist, but at a heavy cost. This temperament is common in the crypto world.
Traders like Lin Chong understand the technicals and can identify key levels, but their biggest weakness is their ability to endure losing positions, making it hard to decisively cut losses. When a position is just trapped and the market slightly breaks support, they don’t exit immediately but keep consoling themselves: it’s just a pullback, the market will come back. Like Lin Chong facing relentless pressure, they always fantasize the opponent will stop and life will return to normal.
As floating losses slightly expand, their psychological defense line keeps retreating. Even though the structure is already broken and signals have turned bad, they still can’t bear to admit losses and exit. They don’t actively cut losses but passively wait for the market to grant a rebound. They always pin their hopes on the market "having a conscience" rather than following their own trading rules. Biden's speech, it's not about what he says
Tonight at 10 PM, US Treasury Secretary Biden will speak to the House of Representatives.
The topic is the international financial system.
The key points are:
The upward pressure on US Treasury yields comes from too much debt issuance.
When the Treasury issues bonds, buyers demand higher interest rates to accept them.
Higher interest rates tighten market liquidity.
The next step is:
If he says he will control the deficit, bond issuance will decrease.
The yield increase can ease.
If he says he will expand fiscal spending, there will be more debt.
Yields will most likely continue to rise.
The speech itself does not change any numbers; it changes the market's expectations of the amount of debt issuance.
#10年期美债收益率突破5% $ETH 🚨 $BTC | LIQUID HACK
The real question isn't “bounty or ransom?”
It’s whether paying 400 BTC to recover 200 BTC makes sense.
With the remaining BTC heavily tracked, time may actually favor Blockstream.
No rushed decision. No unnecessary precedent.
Sometimes, waiting is the stronger move. ⏱️
#BTC #Bitcoin #Liquid VVV vs. ZEC: Two Types of Privacy Narratives, Completely Different Tracks $ZEC is an established privacy public chain token, positioned for financial transaction privacy. It relies on zk-SNARK zero-knowledge proof technology to hide the sender, receiver, and amount in transfers, supporting both transparent and shielded transaction modes. It has a total supply of 21 million tokens, mined through mining, with the project having matured over many years. Recently, it has benefited from the capital expectations of the Grayscale ETF, becoming the leading token in the privacy coin sector. Its value comes from the privacy needs of on-chain payments and asset transfers, with its market driven by the privacy coin sector and institutional ETF news.
$VVV is the native token of Venice AI on the Base chain, focusing on data privacy at the AI inference layer and does not provide transfer anonymity. The platform offers no-log AI text, image, and code generation services, protecting users' conversations and prompts from being stolen or recorded by model service providers. The token mechanism involves staking to obtain API computing power quotas, with platform business revenue proportionally used to repurchase and burn tokens. It relies on AI business growth to drive token demand and belongs to the AI+privacy application narrative.
Both share the privacy spotlight, but their underlying tracks are completely separate. ZEC is a cryptocurrency solving privacy in fund transfers; VVV is an AI application token addressing data privacy in AI interactions.
ZEC is more influenced by institutional and privacy coin sector sentiment; VVV is highly tied to the AI sector's popularity and depends on real platform business growth.
ZEC has been market-tested for a long time but is still suppressed by regulatory policies; VVV is a newly launched token with thin liquidity. With the FOMC approaching, market volatility will amplify the price fluctuations of both.OPEN: The new Alpha on Robinhood Chain?
Recently discovered a very early-stage project called OPEN.
What attracts me most is not the AI concept, but its attempt to use Uniswap V4 Hooks to establish an AI Token liquidity pool, forming:
Trade → Fee → Buy OPEN → Burn
In other words, if the ecosystem's trading volume grows, theoretically it can directly convert into buying pressure and deflation for OPEN.
Currently, the market cap is about $1.7M, still very early, but the trading volume is still very small. #AI development anxiety heats up, chip stocks collectively weaken
Dario calls for a slowdown, chip stocks evaporate 500 billion in one day. On the same day, cybersecurity stocks rose 16%.
▪️ Philadelphia Semiconductor Index -5.86% · All 30 component stocks fell
▪️ CrowdStrike +13.85% hits an all-time high
▪️ Jensen Huang opposes on the spot · Trump: It's all a scam
▪️ Capital expenditure of the five major manufacturers 660 billion · Nearly twice that of last year
The disagreement is not whether AI will slow down, but who benefits from the slowdown. The two companies calling for it have combined annual revenue of about 29 billion, accounting for only about 4% of this year's computing power expenditure—the payers have not responded.
What the US stock market is killing today is duration; the 10-year US Treasury yield broke 5% on the same day. BTC and AI growth stocks share the same denominator, with pricing power at the 9/17 FOMC.
Are you betting this is a security awakening, or a roadblock set for the followers?Besent will go to the House of Representatives at 10 PM tonight to discuss the international financial system. The market is not focused on the theme, but on the tone regarding treasury issuance and repurchase.
At the same hearing, if the wording leans toward tightening the deficit, the upward pressure on yields will ease; if it leans toward expansion, the long end will have to absorb it on its own. On this chain, the pace of bond issuance is the source, yield is the intermediate variable, and risk assets are just the end passengers.
Currently, only the time, occasion, and topic are confirmed; specific numbers must wait for the speech manuscript. For the crypto market, this is not an independent market move but the passive acceptance of interest rate expectations on that end.
Watch the ten-year yield reaction after the hearing. If yields do not move, it means the market considers this just a routine statement, and my judgment will be invalidated. The most awkward part of writing this kind of thing is that I can only watch secondhand reports of the hearing live.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
#10年期美债收益率突破5% #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 $ZEC This Nvidia trade didn’t hit 230 as expected; it first dropped to 212.67. I opened a long at 225, and the page shows this contract’s floating return rate at -274%. I originally just wanted to capture a small upward move, but ended up taking a bigger loss than I intended 🥲
I’m not that pessimistic about its business. On September 10, d-Matrix, which makes AI inference chips, announced that its next-generation product plans to connect to Nvidia’s NVLink Fusion platform. I find this news quite interesting: others making their own chips are still willing to use Nvidia’s interconnect and supporting equipment. In my view, Nvidia doesn’t necessarily have to sell every single GPU to have a chance to profit from AI development. Of course, how much revenue this cooperation will actually bring is still unknown.
Looking at the August financial report, data center revenue grew 117% year-over-year. So I’m willing to view it from a bullish perspective because the demand has already turned into business, not just a temporary “AI outlook is good” excuse after a price drop.
But entering this position at 225 was indeed not well timed. I was aiming for 230, but now I first need to see if I can recover 220. I’ll watch this round number to observe any rebound; if it reaches near there but can’t move up, I’ll consider reducing a bit, no need to wait until 225 breaks even to act.
The take-profit at 230 is still set, but there’s no need to stubbornly stick to that number now. When I opened the position, I planned to take profits after some gain, not to only allow myself to exit with a profit after a drop. #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Bitcoin has already dropped back to 77,000, so why are there more and more people going long????
I just pulled the contract data from OKX and took a look.
In the last nine hours or so, the BTC long-short ratio has risen steadily from 1.20 to 1.58.
This data counts the number of long and short accounts, so it can’t be directly taken as the amount of capital. But it at least shows one thing: the lower the price goes, the more people rush in to bottom-fish.
#DailyOrbit #FOMCRateCallThisWeek If there is 1 million USD, I won't split it evenly, but will arrange my strategy based on strength. Then guess who I put first? I've had a very intuitive feeling these past two days: BTC acts like a ballast stone, ETH acts like a main attacker, ZEC and SOL act more like elastic positions. If a seven-figure capital really enters, I won't spread pepper powder; instead, I first distinguish who will hold on, who will rush, and who will only do swing trading. Let's look at BTC first. In the 320,000 USD scenario, buy in batches from 76,000 to 77,000 USD, hold above 80,000 and add more, and only after a strong breakout above 82,500 will open up space above; If it falls below 75,500, then withdraw, not hold firmly. The focus of this logic is not the price itself, but that it determines the portfolio's risk bottom line. If BTC is stable, ETH and altcoins will have a window to perform; If BTC falls, no matter how good other positions are, they'll be dragged down. ETH takes 200,000 USD, waits for the 2,450 to 2,500 range, holds above 2,600 to add positions, targeting 2,800 to 3,000. It's more like an amplifier of risk appetite. When BTC is sideways, funds tend to move toward ETH first, then decide whether to continue sinking to more elastic targets. So ETH's strength is the first door to see if the altcoin season has truly started. ZEC with 250,000 USD, observe near 1,100, break above 1,200 and add more, break below 1,050 minus, and hold above 1,250 to count as trend confirmation. It relies on large-scale narratives and independent market movements, but these stocks usually move at a faster pace, and before a confirmation signal is issued, it's easy to hold too much positionSomething rare happened in the AI circle yesterday: the loudest to shout "Wolf is coming" was the one who made the wolf.
Anthropic's CEO published a long article warning that AI's "recursive self-improvement" could get out of control, and also said OpenAI's agents attacked HuggingFace. Even more rare, Altman and Musk publicly liked and supported it; the three giants unusually stood on the same side, all calling to "slow down."
The market voted with its feet directly: chip stocks collectively plunged, while cybersecurity stocks surged across the board.
CrowdStrike +13.8% hit a record high, the software sector outperformed semiconductors by 10.67 percentage points in a single day, the largest gap in history.
Do you see this rotation clearly?
Money hasn't left AI; it just shifted from "making computing power" to "managing computing power."
The most ironic is still Anthropic itself: on one hand shouting "slow down AI," on the other sprinting toward a 2 trillion valuation IPO.
Yesterday it was "pressing brake and accelerator simultaneously," today it's clear—they are braking to raise funds and accelerating to go public.
I care about this especially because I said last week that storage would crack first.
SanDisk fell back from above 1800 to 1575; the crack hasn't been fixed, just expanded in a different way: before it couldn't rise, now the whole sector is dragged down by security anxiety.
This AI feast might really need to change seats next.
Chip makers step aside, security managers take the table.
#AI发展焦虑升温，芯片股集体走弱 $SNDK $NVDA $FIL #AI development anxiety heats up, chip stocks collectively weaken
In this wave of sell-off, SanDisk, Micron, and Hynix, the three memory chip companies, were hit the hardest. The market logic is straightforward: when AI slows down, HBM and high-bandwidth memory are the first to be cut; if training scale doesn't expand, demand for memory chips naturally declines.
But I think this line of thinking is flawed.
First, AI is not just about training. While large model training may indeed slow down now, inference is just beginning to explode. Enterprises deploying AI into actual business require computing power and storage support for every call, and inference demand for HBM may not be less than training. SanDisk, Micron, and Hynix produce not only chips for training but also the underlying storage for the entire AI infrastructure.
Second, the cyclical recovery of memory chips is already underway. Demand from automotive electronics, phone replacements, and server expansions is rising; AI is not the only buyer. Tying the fate of memory chips solely to the "speed of cutting-edge large model R&D" is a narrow view.
Therefore, I judge this more as a high-level emotional venting rather than a fundamental turning point. AI commercialization is just beginning, the long-term trend of computing power demand remains unchanged, and storage as infrastructure will only become more important, not disappear because of a few articles.
What really needs attention is the capital expenditure guidance from cloud providers. Even if Amazon, Microsoft, and Google cut budgets and run later, before that happens, core assets like SanDisk, Micron, and Hynix, which have been mistakenly sold off, may present opportunities from panic-driven dips. $SNDK, $MU, $SKHYNIX 🔷 While ETFs were flowing out, treasuries were buying
• Strive: 469 $BTC for $36.6M, totaling 25,000 BTC through the SATA program
• Average $77,954 above EMA $77,430: buying what ETFs are selling
🧠 $463M from ETFs — part moved into balances. Sentiment and skeleton diverged: the skeleton with a long position sets the price.
⚠️ SATA — fixed dividend, not a margin call; but it pressures the balance at any BTC price.
❓ Who is right: ETFs or treasuries?👇 $XRP shorts have tied themselves to this afternoon's vote
The entire market is retreating today, but it alone is charging forward, and quite fiercely.
The reason is written on the calendar.
This afternoon there is a Senate procedural vote on whether to legally classify XRP as a commodity. This threshold requires bipartisan votes, and the opposing side does not have nearly enough seats.
What’s really interesting is the position of the shorts. According to the liquidation map, if the price rises just five percentage points, nearly ten million dollars worth of short positions will be forcibly liquidated, with the pain point around 1.46. Futures open interest has already risen to the highest level in half a year, and the one-week implied volatility priced into options is nearly twice the usual — everyone is paying a premium for a binary outcome.
Institutions have actually been buying all along; its spot ETF cumulative net inflows have nearly reached 1.7 billion dollars, but over 80% of the money in this channel is still retail, not a whale-level buying force capable of supporting the price.
The reward for betting right is very direct, and the cost of betting wrong is just as direct. This is not a night for conclusions based on analysis, but a night for position management.OpenAI's IPO delay may cause the most discomfort not on Wall Street, but among employees and early investors who have held shares for years and are waiting to cash out.
Private companies can avoid quarterly performance pressure but cannot permanently avoid liquidity issues. Employee compensation includes a large amount of equity, and funds have expiration periods. If the public listing continues to be postponed, the company will need to arrange more share buybacks or secondary market transactions; otherwise, no matter how high the book wealth is, it will be difficult to truly convert it into usable cash.
The secondary market can temporarily relieve pressure but will create another pricing system. Different batches of investors may buy and sell at different discounts, and ordinary employees usually have less information, bargaining power, and trading opportunities than large institutions. The longer the IPO is delayed, the harder it is to avoid fairness issues in internal liquidity.
Sam Altman says that going public now is not conducive to AI safety, and this reason deserves serious consideration. But choosing not to go public also means the company needs to provide a more complete alternative plan so that employees and early shareholders do not have to endlessly subsidize the company's long-term goals with patience.
Safety can require capital to wait, but it cannot require all shareholders to live forever just watching valuation numbers.
#OpenAICEO称2026年不会IPO The coin that doubled and a half in seven days gave back most of it in just one day. $LSK is now at 0.2631 USDT, down 26.4% in 24h.
The highest was 0.3689, the lowest 0.2415, with a volatility of 35.6%, fluctuating by one-third within a day. The trading volume is 5.08 million USDT, ranking 29th in the entire market for USDT pairs, which is not very large.
At the same time, $BTC is at 77,096.2 USDT, down 1.1% in 24h, $ZEC at 1,145.48 USDT, up 0.7% in 24h. The overall market is almost flat; this drop is caused by LSK itself.
Legzi pulled out the 7-day moving average and saw it still showing +157.7%. This drop just gave back part of last week's gains. If you bought near 0.3574, don't treat short-term positions as long-term holds. Recently, discussions about SUI have become increasingly heated, and I've noticed the market is starting to show two extremes. One side says SUI is just starting and there's still plenty of room in this bull market; Another side says after such a big rise, entering now means taking over. I thought about it seriously for a long time and finally concluded: it's true to be optimistic about SUI, but in a bull market, managing positions is more important, not sentiment. Many people like to idolize a coin after entering the crypto market. As long as you hold it, it will definitely rise; If others question it, you feel they're missing out. In fact, the market never changes direction just because of our holdings. I am optimistic about SUI for several reasons. First, it's not a project that only relies on MEME hype, but is constantly improving its ecosystem. From wallets, DeFi, stablecoins, to more and more developers entering the market, these factors determine whether it can continuously attract capital. Second, attention to SUI is still increasing. In a real big market, price increases are just the result; capital inflows are the real cause. If an ecosystem has people continuously using it, developing, and trading, its vitality is usually stronger than pure concept projects. However, none of these reasons can be summed up in one sentence: it will keep rising. The biggest misconception in a bull market is confusing "long-term optimism" with "short-term won't fall." Many people double their accounts but don't want to sell one because they think selling will cause the price to disappear. But after a big bearish candlestick hits, profits shrink by half, and they start comforting themselves with "long-term value investing." Honestly, I have done this before$LIT should be the next $HYPE
First, let's talk about the basic data: Hyperliquid's daily revenue is about 2 million, FDV 80 billion; Lighter's daily revenue is about 150,000, FDV 4.5 billion. Comparing within the same sector, LIT offers better value: zero fees, superior user/FDV ratio, and strong stickiness after use.
The expectations for HYPE mainly lie in US localization and HIP-3/4, but most retail investors and institutions in the circle have basically already invested, so further growth requires larger external capital inflows. LIT's expectations are compliance, Robinhood, options expansion, etc., and currently, relatively few crypto institutions and retail investors hold it, so the position is not as heavy.
Therefore, from the current cost-performance perspective, I personally feel that chasing HYPE's further rise is not very rational. I am more inclined towards LIT, and looking at the PerpDEX sector ahead, LIT is very likely to outperform HYPE in the upcoming market. Let's wait and see.
#OKX星球话题来啦
#波动雷达：币种异动观察