Orbit Post Sitemap
82,000 Tug of War! A Whale Bets $187 Million on the Line, Are You In?
Yesterday BTC once plunged below 79,694, triggering a total liquidation of 929 million across the network, with longs wiped out everywhere. Now at 82,348, looks stable? Don’t rush.
$BTC: The resistance at 88,000 is the cost line for holders over 6-12 months, heavy selling pressure; the support at 78,000 is the "real market average" bottom line. Coinglass data: below 78,166, cumulative long liquidation intensity is 1.695 billion, above 85,909, short liquidation intensity is 1.126 billion. Strategy: light long at 81,800, stop loss at 81,400, target 82,900; short near 83,200, stop loss at 83,650.
$ETH: Current price 2,453, Binance single platform liquidation 157 million, total ETH liquidation 292 million, rebound interrupted. But a whale opened a $187 million long with max leverage—BTC opened at 82,409, liquidated at 80,634; ETH opened at 2,455, liquidated at 2,406. Also, a whale sold 1,601 BTC and bought 53,095 ETH over 5 days. Strategy: light long at 2,420, stop loss at 2,400, target 2,475-2,500; short at 2,480, stop loss at 2,510.
Derivatives open interest dropped from 20 billion to 15 billion, leverage is clearing out. Repair rebound, quick in and out. The whale’s stop loss line is your risk control line. XPL is still up about 9%, but the nominal value of contract positions has dropped about 14% from the 4 AM high.
As of 10:53 AM Beijing time, OKEx spot is around $0.08486, with 24-hour trading volume about $7.03 million, and an intraday high of $0.08844. OKEx perpetual contract nominal position value was about $8.66 million at 4 AM, about $7.89 million at 10 AM, and about $7.45 million at 10:53 AM. The current price has fallen about 4% from the intraday high.
My judgment is that after the rise, some positions are withdrawing. The decline in positions does not clearly indicate which side, long or short, exited first, so using this alone to infer a guaranteed drop later is untenable. At least it shows that the 24-hour price increase and current contract participation are moving in different directions.
I am more focused on whether the price can break above $0.08844 again, while the positions stop falling and start to rise. If both happen together, the current cautious judgment should be revised; if positions continue to decline during the rebound, the increase in price alone is still insufficient to prove new positions are entering.
$XPL 20:33, a moment that collectively broke the defense of holders. PPI data was just released, and market sentiment instantly shifted, yet a trader cleared out their strongest cards at this very point: $UNI pulled back from 6.85 to 7.45, $ARB rebounded from 0.172 to 0.18488, $NEAR with a cost basis of 4.58 was almost break-even but had 10% profit cut, and $WLD with a cost of 0.468, risk-free, was also sold in the same minute, then immediately surged to 0.5. This is not an isolated case but the most typical retail investor dilemma in this round of macro data-driven market moves. What’s truly worth analyzing is not the "missed sell" itself, but why it happened precisely at the 20:30 PPI node. Recently, the market’s sensitivity to inflation data has clearly increased; within minutes after data release, capital often first chooses direction, then decides whether to continue. $UNI, as a top gainer, indicates capital actively going long on strong coins after the data; $ARB, though not on the leaderboard, simultaneously recovered, suggesting linked buying in the Layer2 sector; the movements of $NEAR and $WLD are even more critical—they were not driven by emotional pulses but were repriced near their cost zones. In other words, the sell-off at 20:33 precisely hit the inflection point where capital shifted from "waiting" to "attacking." From the market structure perspective, this round of recovery has an easily overlooked feature: strong coins move first, lagging coins follow, and holders, due to consecutive losses in recent days, have mentally switched to a "capital preservation first" mode. $NEAR cost #ETF and Whale Funds Diverge, Can BTC Hold $80,000?
Just reviewed some data; both bulls and bears are betting on the $80,000 level.
On one side, ETFs are withdrawing. The latest single-day net outflow is 3,209 BTC, about $258 million. On the other side, large holders are accumulating. Bitfinex data shows that since late August, large holders have increased their holdings by about 60,000 BTC, mainly buying in the $80,000 to $86,000 range. Money is flowing out, whales are moving in, the directions are completely opposite.
What’s more troublesome is the macro environment. CPI and PPI have consecutively exceeded expectations; September PPI rose 6.3% year-over-year and 1.3% month-over-month, with production costs and service prices heating up together. Rate hike expectations are rising again, with US Treasury yields and the dollar both pushing higher. Risk assets are generally under pressure, and BTC is no exception.
Currently, BTC is hovering around $82,000, with a market dominance of about 60%. Below this level, $80,000 to $81,000 is short-term key support, and below that is $78,000. Above, $83,500 to $84,500 is a resistance zone, which is hard to break without volume.
My judgment is simple. Whether the $80,000 level can hold depends not on the candlesticks but on the funds. If ETF outflows slow and whales keep buying, $80,000 will likely hold, and the market will oscillate between $80,000 and $84,000. If ETFs continue large outflows and whales stop buying, once $80,000 breaks, stop-loss orders and leveraged liquidations will pile up, pushing prices down to $78,000 or even $75,000.
$BTC Sister Bao's short position layout: ambush on the left side, completely different from Boss Shi's style
When Sister Bao's operation record from mid-October came out, Boss Shi's "long-short game" scenario gained another comparison sample. Her style is neither chasing shorts at high levels nor stubbornly holding on, but rather an earlier ambush with unified direction and lighter positions.
All three trades are sell-to-open shorts. The ETH short opened at 2530.2 with 10x leverage, about 50,000 U, marking the starting point of this round of shorts; the BTC short opened at 83976.3 with 3x leverage, also about 50,000 U, representing a light position trial; the NEAR short opened at 5.229 with 1x leverage, about 20,000 U, a low-leverage altcoin probe. The three trades total about 120,000 U, with a clear rhythm: prioritize mainstream, layered leverage, altcoins only for probing.
The contrast with Boss Shi is even more obvious. On November 18, Boss Shi went long then short, with BTC and XRP shorts floating profits of about 780,000 U, 10x full position, quick reversal and heavy-handed. Sister Bao laid out shorts early in mid-October; if positions continued into late November, they would cover Boss Shi's short profit zone, but with much lighter positions, leaning more towards "correct direction, steady profit-taking."
Boss Shi is like a right-side heavy strike, adding positions after direction confirmation; Sister Bao is like a left-side probe, laying out early but controlling risk. The same market move, two capital rhythms, each with reference value.Negative news has landed, so why do I first look for a sentiment turning point?
CPI exceeded expectations, and the market's initial reaction was a sell-off. But looking closely, after BTC's drop, it did not accelerate to break the bottom; instead, it found support at a low level. This indicates a key issue: the negative news itself may not be the main point; the focus is on how the market digests it.
When inflation data clearly leans negative, retail investors panic, and leveraged longs get liquidated, short-term selling pressure tends to exhaust easily. At this time, I pay more attention to three dimensions:
First, whether the funding rate turns from positive to negative. Negative funding rates often mean shorts are becoming crowded, and if the price consolidates without falling, short covering can trigger passive buying.
Second, stablecoin premium and on-chain transfers. If the USDT premium rises and large on-chain transfers into exchanges decrease, it indicates selling willingness is cooling down rather than panic intensifying.
Third, the $ETH/$BTC ratio. If BTC stabilizes while ETH continues to weaken, it shows funds are still seeking safety, and the quality of the rebound is questionable; conversely, it signals risk appetite is warming up.
What truly deserves caution is not the negative news itself, but if prices continue to fall after the negative news while open interest rapidly climbs—that indicates new leverage is accumulating against the trend, and the next round of liquidations will be more severe.
At present, I tend to believe this round of decline has already cleaned out some overheated chips. If BTC can hold the previous low and funding rates return to neutral, a rebound could start at any time. But a rebound does not equal a reversal; the key is whether spot volume supports it.
Negative news is not scary; what is scary is that the market remains fragile after the negative news. And opportunities often hide in the silence of a price that refuses to fall. #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ CPI and PPI data missed expectations two nights in a row, $BTC fell below the 80,000 mark, and $ETH's top player Bitmine is also stopping additional purchases. Can the dual kings make a comeback?
$BTC: Last night, the core PPI rose 1.3% month-over-month, hitting a new high since March 2022, causing BTC to break below 80,000 directly.
Why the rebound? The turning point came from the International Energy Agency releasing 100 million barrels of oil reserves, and the 10-year US Treasury yield quickly falling from 5.3% to 5.04%, briefly improving risk sentiment. BTC rebounded and surged to 82,600.
Long positions liquidated $72 million; during the rebound, short positions chasing the rally were liquidated for $19 million. Both bulls and bears took hits in this volatile market.
Technical analysis: Bears dominate, the 80,000 support wall has been broken, and the market has entered a phase of disorderly oscillation. 84,000 is the dividing line between bulls and bears. Even if the rebound reaches 82,600, the overall structure still favors the bears.
$ETH: ETF funds continue to bleed, with BTC+ETH spot ETFs seeing a combined net outflow of $390 million in a single day. Bitmine will complete its 5% holding target in 6 more weeks and then stop increasing its position.
The 2,450-2,500 resistance zone continues to weigh down; RSI has slightly risen from 37 but remains in a neutral to weak range, suggesting reducing positions on rebounds.
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ After the panic, the market experienced a clear risk release yesterday. CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations consecutively, but an interesting phenomenon is:
Gold did not continue to plunge; instead, it rose again.
PPI year-on-year reached 6.3%, but US Treasury yields fell, the dollar weakened, and combined with the sharp adjustment in the AI sector driving safe-haven demand, gold returned to around $4160.
So my logic for this gold long position mainly remains:
Capital allocation + safe-haven demand.
In contrast, although the storage sector rebounded today, Hynix still saw large foreign capital selling yesterday. Institutions and retail investors are absorbing it, but the market's subsequent reaction remains to be seen.
BTC has reclaimed above $80,000 with some absorption, but the capital strength is still temporarily weaker than gold.
My view:
The market is moving from panic selling into an observation period.
Some assets are beginning to see capital absorption, but that does not mean the trend has reversed.
What is more important now is to see:
Whether capital has truly returned, not how much the price has fallen.
In the short term, do not chase shorts, nor blindly bottom-fish just because of continuous declines.
Opportunities can wait; risks do not need to be rushed.
$XAUT $BTC $ETH 比特币素来以高波动率著称，这让它看上去和传统投资品种相去甚远。但将它的价格波动与美国大盘股对比，会得出一个出人意料的视角。过去一年，比特币的已实现波动率落在标普 500 成分股的波动区间之内，有相当数量的大盘股波动比比特币还要剧烈（图表1）。比特币过去一年波动率降至 43%，对比其过去十年均值 64%、五年前 81% 的水平已明显回落。目前它的波动率低于 19% 的标普 500 成分股。 事实上，不只是过去一年，过去整整十年间，比特币波动率都出现显著下行。随着该资产逐步走向成熟，流动性更加充裕、机构参与度提升、合规交易渠道增多，其价格波动相比早期的极端状态已经大幅收窄。虽然当前波动率仍高于样本中的多数股票，但我们认为，它已经不再属于完全独立的另一类风险资产。 这就把投资问题从要不要配置高波动资产，转变为该配置多大仓位。投资者管理高波动持仓的通用做法，是按照自身风险承受能力控制仓位规模，同时评估该资产和投资组合其余部分的联动表现。这套方法同样适用于比特币。 单一年度的数据，不足以完整反映比特币在全市场周期下的风险特征，但该对比给投资者提供了一个切实的参照。对于能够接受波动型股票的投资者而2 million long on Korean ETF: "Blood-stained chips" after an 18.8% plunge, I've decided to increase my position
The Korean KOSPI once fell nearly 8% intraday on October 15, with Samsung Electronics down 9.48% and SK Hynix down 11.06%, triggering the Sidecar mechanism on the exchange again. But at today's open, KOSPI jumped 1.8% to 5653.99 points, with intraday gains expanding to 3% at one point. I've decided to go long on the Korean ETF with 2 million at this level.
Why now?
Valuations have dropped to historically extreme levels. KB Securities data shows KOSPI's P/E ratio has fallen to about 8 times, close to the lows during the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic. Foreign ownership of Samsung Electronics has dropped to its lowest since 2008, and SK Hynix's foreign ownership rate has also fallen below the ten-year average. Foreign investors have net sold about 203 trillion KRW of KOSPI this year, with Samsung and SK Hynix accounting for 86% of that.
But fundamentals and stock prices are severely diverging. TSMC's recently released Q3 results show no signs of slowing AI semiconductor demand, and ASML also confirmed that customers' medium- to long-term demand expectations continue to rise. TrendForce predicts Q4 DRAM prices will record double-digit gains. The market has overinterpreted China's CXMT's technological catch-up—analysts point out that mass production depends on yield rates, and a 50% yield means a large number of chips cannot be shipped at all, so the supply-demand structure of the memory market cannot change in the short term. #韩股修复反弹，外资卖压能否缓解？
$KORU Is Netflix's growth slowing down, with advertising business becoming a new focus?
In my view, short-term (next 1-2 quarters) growth slowdown is a priced-in reality. The Q3 earnings report (October 20) will focus on whether advertising revenue is approaching the full-year target of 3 billion, whether membership/engagement shows marginal improvement, and whether the full-year guidance is maintained. If advertising continues to accelerate and profit margins remain robust, there is room for stock price recovery; if advertising again falls short of expectations and guidance is lowered, it will reinforce the "growth deceleration" narrative.
From a long-term perspective, the advertising business is the most valuable incremental and variable factor to track. If it can sustain double-digit growth and gradually increase its share, it could help Netflix stabilize overall growth in the mid-double-digit range, supporting its content moat and pricing power. But if engagement remains weak, the advertising monetization ceiling will arrive early, and the company will resemble more of a "high-profit but low-growth" cash cow, with a corresponding adjustment in valuation.
Overall, the user growth story is basically told, and the advertising monetization story is just entering a critical validation period. This is a typical path for mature streaming giants—neither pessimistic nor blindly optimistic. The key lies in execution pace and continuous delivery of advertising data.
#奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 Market Review on October 16｜Rebound Amid High Inflation: Genuine Recovery or Short Covering? Last night, the US PPI surged 1.3% month-over-month and rose to 6.3% year-over-year, with core PPI also remaining elevated. Previously, CPI also exceeded expectations, indicating that inflationary pressure has not cooled down quickly. However, the crypto market did not continue a one-sided sell-off today: BTC rebounded from below 80,000 to around 82,000, ETH returned to about 2,440, and SOL held the $100 mark and bounced back to near 105. I tend to define today as a "technical recovery after bad news was priced in," not yet a trend reversal. Key points to watch next: whether BTC can firmly hold 82,500–83,000; whether ETH can maintain 2,400; whether SOL can reclaim 106–108 and confirm the $100 support is effective; XAUT remains strong, indicating that the market's demand for safe-haven assets has not disappeared. It is currently unwise to turn aggressively bullish based on a single rebound candlestick. Macro high inflation remains the main theme, and position management is more important than directional predictions. For market research record only, not investment advice. This rebound looks quite lively, but to be honest—don’t get carried away.
I mentioned last night that the short-term is in a repair phase, but it’s still far from a reversal. Whether this morning’s rebound can continue depends on how Walsh will speak later.
🔸 $BTC｜82,000, holding this level means repair, failing to hold is a trap
After dropping from 79,775 and then being pulled back, there is indeed buying around 80,000. But don’t celebrate too early—the resistance zone from 82,600 to 83,000 is no joke. It’s easy to push up, but hard to hold.
After yesterday’s PPI data release, Bitcoin was once hit down to 79,694, then quickly rebounded to 82,520. It looks strong, but do you know what happened behind the scenes? $929 million worth of leveraged positions were liquidated within 24 hours, with longs liquidated for $777 million. This wasn’t buying pressure pushing it up; it was clearly shorts covering and pulling the price up. Spot buying didn’t keep up at all. So whether 82,000 is a solid bottom or just paper-thin will be revealed today.
If it holds, repair has a chance to continue. If it falls back below 81,000, don’t hesitate to guard against testing 80,000 again.
🔸 $ETH｜2,400 is the lifeline for this repair
Climbing from 2,317, everything now depends on whether it can hold near 2,400. This level is not arbitrary—2,397 is exactly the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement level, almost overlapping the 2,400 round number. Both bulls and bears are watching closely here.
Holding 2,400 opens the way to 2,450; breaking through that allows further repair. If it doesn’t hold, first watch 2,380, and if weaker, beware of retesting previous lows. On-chain data shows whale addresses have reduced about 170,000 $ETH in the past 24 hours, and funding rates have turned negative. Big players are quietly selling off; this signal can’t be ignored.
🔸 11:30, Walsh is today’s biggest wildcard
CPI rose 0.6% month-over-month, PPI surged 1.3% month-over-month—the largest increase since March 2022—and core PPI hit 5% year-over-year. With this data out, the market most wants to hear Walsh’s take on inflation.
For context—Walsh already made strong remarks at Jackson Hole in August, saying inflation hasn’t substantially eased and the Fed "still has work to do." He never plays the forward guidance game, preferring the market to price based on data. So at 11:30 in Bangkok, he likely won’t explicitly say whether there will be a rate hike in October, but if his tone remains hawkish, this rebound could be crushed immediately.
The probability of a rate hike in October has surged from under 20% to over 55%, though it has since eased somewhat. The market nerves are very tight. Conversely, if he doesn’t reinforce tightening signals, short-term pressure might ease. But remember—not hawkish enough doesn’t mean dovish.
🔸 My stance hasn’t changed
Don’t chase shorts after a sharp drop, and don’t chase longs after a few green candles. First listen to Walsh, then see if the 82,000 and 2,400 levels hold.
Having barely avoided the previous drop, don’t rush to pay the price for volatility again.
(The above is purely personal review and does not constitute investment advice; manage your own positions.)
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 #特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 #ETF and Whale Funds Diverge, Can BTC Hold $80,000?
BTC has reached the $80,000 mark again, with bulls and bears battling it out here.
Let me tell you something: ETFs are selling off while whales are buying, completely opposite moves. The US Bitcoin spot ETF sold 3,209 coins in one day, roughly $258 million. But Bitfinex data shows that large holders have cumulatively bought 60,000 coins from late August until now, with purchase prices between $80,000 and $86,000. One side is selling, the other is buying; in the short term, it's hard to say who's right or wrong.
Adding to that, CPI and PPI have consecutively exceeded expectations, raising interest rate hike expectations again, putting pressure on risk assets overall. Whether this level can hold is the key focus going forward.
I have two points. First, short-term sentiment is definitely bearish; ETF funds are withdrawing, macro factors are pressuring, so $80,000 likely won't hold. Second, whales continue to accumulate at this level, indicating long-term investors see value around $80,000 and are supporting the dip. So now it's a period of consolidation and bottoming out; don't bet on a one-sided move.
Overall, going with the trend is fine; be patient and wait for opportunities. $78,000 is our counterattack position $BTC $ETH ZEC, the privacy coin, is showing a deep V again, burying over 17.9 million longs. Is this a shakeout or a market top?
ZEC's recent price action has been a rollercoaster. OKX current price is 1220, flat intraday, but within 24 hours it dropped to a low of 1074 and peaked at 1254, with a nearly 17% amplitude and a long lower shadow candle; about 17.9 million USD worth of longs were liquidated in the last 24 hours, basically coinciding with the market's 3.7% pullback, burying high leverage positions first before bouncing back in a V shape.
First, a disclaimer: some are speculating about "development company ECC exiting," but that's old news from January this year. After the team split, ZODL took over maintenance, the network continues to produce blocks as usual, and in July it switched to the new Zebra nodes. Don't treat old news as today's negative factor.
The fundamentals remain the same: Grayscale's ZCSH holds about 3% of circulating supply locked, the NU7 upgrade on November 5 reduced block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, and the founder has recently been calling for a 2000 starting price, but these are long-term logics, not reasons to chase price today.
From the chart perspective, the current price is pressed below MA5 (1224), MA30 (1231), and below the Bollinger middle band. MACD just formed a death cross but still stands above the super trend at 1208 and MA120, indicating a strong trend with high volatility shakeout; the direction is not yet decided. Watch if the price can break above 1231/1254 with volume, and avoid effective breakdowns below 1181 and 1208; tonight's PPI and BTC's 80,000 level are more critical than anything else. High beta, two-way spikes, don't get carried away with leverage. DYOR, not investment advice.
#ZEC #Zcash #privacycoin Retail investors and whales are going head-to-head, I'm watching the 80,000 mark closely
Today I checked the long-short ratio on OKX and saw a pretty interesting picture.
On the retail side, the $BTC long-short ratio is 1.64, with a bunch of people adding longs on the rebound, showing strong bottom-fishing sentiment; on the whale side, it's only 0.67, with sentiment extremely bearish. One is 1.64, the other 0.67, two groups completely opposing each other at the same level.
I usually pay extra attention to this kind of divergence. In futures contracts, long and short positions are always balanced; when retail investors cluster heavily on one side, it's often small orders padding the numbers, while large orders are accumulating on the opposite side. Retail investors desperately add longs, whales quietly lean short—it's not hard to guess who is supporting whom in the end.
Looking at the chart, the 80,000 level has already been breached once; BTC dropped as low as 79,800, breaking below for the first time in early October, then rallied 3% back to 82,000, with $ETH following back to 2,450. It looks like the level held, but the defense line was kicked once, which is very different from never being touched.
There’s still something hanging below. If 78,166 breaks, mainstream exchange long liquidations will pile up to 1.7 billion USD, triggering a chain reaction.
This time, I side with the whales. Whether 80,000 can hold is the answer; if it holds, I was wrong, if it breaks, the pile of buy orders below will continue to support.
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？
#ETF与巨鲸资金分化，BTC能否守住8万美元？ ETFs are withdrawing, whales are buying, but the support below 80,000 is weakening
The US spot $BTC ETF saw a net outflow of $262 million in a single day, wiping out the inflow from the previous day. The $ETH ETF lost $130 million on the same day, and $SOL has been down for 8 consecutive days.
CryptoQuant shows the opposite: BTC whale total holdings have risen to 3.03 million coins, the highest since November 2025, with the 30-day accumulation rate the highest since February this year.
But Glassnode analyzed Binance's order book and found that the large buy orders around 80,000 have been absorbed, with new buy orders concentrated near 78,000.
Although the price has returned above 82,000, the support below 80,000 is thinner than before; breaking below would create a vacuum.
Whales are buying, ETFs are withdrawing, and support below 80,000 is thinning.
The real focus is whether the buy orders at 78,000 can hold if 80,000 is broken.
#ETF与巨鲸资金分化，BTC能否守住8万美元？ 其实“A股都不分红”是个错觉：A股总体分红并不少（2024 年全市场现金分红约 2.4 万亿元，创历史新高），但问题是分红高度集中 + 很多公司长期不分红，所以散户体感是“买了半天没拿到钱”。 核心原因可以拆成几层： 1. 很多公司“没能力分” - 长期亏损、利润为负数 - 账面有收入但未分配利润是负的（以前亏太多，还没填平） - 负债高、现金流紧，留着钱保命 这类公司不是不想分，是分不出来。 2. 成长期公司“不愿分” A 股里大量是制造业、科技、新能源、医药等成长期企业： - 要扩产 - 要搞研发 - 要还债/补流 - 行业波动大，留现金防寒冬 对它们来说，把利润再投入，比分红更符合股东长期利益。 所以银行、煤炭、电信、电力、白酒这些成熟行业爱分红；小票、概念票、科创票普遍不分红。 3. 历史上是“重融资、轻回报” 早期 A 股定位偏融资功能： - 上市壳值钱 - 大股东靠减持、质押、定增赚钱 - 分红不是考核项 - 监管以前主要是“鼓励分红”，不是“强制分红” 所以很多实控人逻辑是： 把公司做上市 → 估值炒高 → 减持套现，而不是“每年给股东发红利”。 4. 治理问题：有钱也不#奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点
Netflix's story is shifting from "how many members remain" to "how much can be earned from each user."
Q2 revenue was $12.56 billion, up 13.4% year-over-year, with decent profits, but the market clearly isn't buying it—because growth is slowing down, with Q3 guidance only at 11.7%. The golden era of subscription growth is basically over.
But don't just focus on the "slowdown."
The advertising business is the new storyline: ad revenue is expected to exceed $1.5 billion in 2025, with a target of about $3 billion in 2026, doubling directly; the monthly active audience for ads has already surpassed 250 million, with live sports, pause ads, programmatic placements, and proprietary ad tech stacks all being rolled out.
In short:
Netflix is no longer just a "membership-selling company," but is becoming a composite of "memberships + ads + live entertainment."
The old engine is slowing down, and the new engine isn't fully connected yet, so the stock price hurts first;
but advertising is already the thing that most resembles the second curve.🚨 $BTC In the long-term trend, there is a pattern worth paying attention to.
Over the past decade, Bitcoin has repeatedly operated along a long-term logarithmic growth channel, experiencing bottom accumulation, trend expansion, new highs, and then deep corrections.
📈 Several important historical highs:
• 2013: $1,242
• 2017: $19,700
• 2021: $69,000
• 2025: $126,000
At the same time, the largest historical drawdown has shown a trend of gradual narrowing.
This may indicate that the market is maturing: the magnitude of crashes is gradually decreasing, but the gains in each bull market cycle may also decline accordingly.
If the long-term growth channel continues to hold, the next cycle target projected in the original analysis is around $350,000 near 2029.
Of course, historical patterns do not guarantee the future, and the channel may fail.
What is truly worth studying is whether Bitcoin's long-term cycle is undergoing a change.📊 #特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 There is no possibility of exceeding expectations; only low-awareness funds would think this is risk-free arbitrage.#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins
SUBSCRIPTION - Maturing but not done
Paid subs now >325M globally. Growth slowed from +41M in 2024, but Netflix still sees low penetration vs addressable market. Growth driver now is higher ARPU through price hikes and paid sharing, not just adding users.The data completely exceeded expectations, and the market did not follow the script, which was indeed quite surprising. According to traditional logic, this should have pushed up rate hike expectations and suppressed risk assets.
This time, the opposite happened: US Treasury yields plunged more than 13 basis points, gold rebounded 1.5%, and Bitcoin fluctuated repeatedly around the eighty-thousand mark. Many think this is a reversal, but I see it more as an oversold buying opportunity!
Inflation panic has turned into growth panic, with funds flowing into Treasuries for safety. Some might think that funds flowing into Treasuries are bullish for crypto, but this is especially easy to confuse! There are two different capital flows for Treasuries! Institutional buying of Treasuries ≠ buying stablecoins, and stablecoins buying Treasuries ≠ crypto buying. These two channels flow in opposite directions and have completely different effects.
Institutions sell stocks and risk assets → buy Treasuries → funds enter Treasury or counterparty accounts → this money has nothing to do with crypto; it is purely a safe-haven move. Funds are withdrawn from risk assets into risk-free assets, and this process drains liquidity from crypto rather than injecting it!
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ $BTC $ETH Reader question: Are there any simple and practical tips for phased top-selling?
Yearly reply: No need for complicated indicators, just remember these few points:
1. Good news keeps coming, but the price no longer hits new highs, start reducing positions in batches;
2. Price hits new highs, but trading volume keeps shrinking, indicating that the chasing funds are exhausted;
3. Set profit-taking levels in advance, don’t gamble on selling at the absolute peak;
4. When macro warnings sound and individual stocks in the market weaken in advance, reduce your position.
The essence of top-selling is not to catch the peak, but to hold onto the profits already made. $BTC $ETH $OKB Inflation hasn't cooled down; instead, it's gotten hotter.
The US September PPI year-on-year surged to 6.3%, the highest since December 2022, far exceeding the market expectation of 5.3%, and last month's data was revised up to 5.6%. Wholesale prices are moving upward again.
PPI is an upstream price indicator, and sooner or later it will transmit to the consumer side. So this is not just "past data," but more like an early warning for the next CPI report. The market will find it hard to treat this as isolated noise.
This is completely different from what many expect—"inflation cooling down and the Fed easing accordingly." Washington was already pushing to reduce forward guidance and downplay the dot plot, and now with an unexpectedly high PPI, it's basically telling the market: don't rush to calculate the Fed's rate cut timing.
Interestingly, last night US stocks first fell then rallied, and BTC still held around 82,000. It seems risk assets are not buying this number, or perhaps they've become somewhat numb. Once rate cut expectations are delayed, the first to react should be US Treasury yields.
My view is that one PPI report won't reverse the trend, but it will gradually erode the expectation that "rate cuts are coming soon." The longer the expectation is delayed, the more painful it is for highly valued assets. This is not a reason for an immediate crash, but it will slowly remove the optimism supporting risk assets.
So I want to ask you: do you think this PPI is just noise, or a prelude to a second wave of inflation? If rate cuts are really delayed until next year, how would you adjust your portfolio? Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $261 million in a single day,
and over the past two weeks, $BTC Bitcoin and $ETH Ethereum ETFs have collectively dumped $1.56 billion.
The most notable aspect of this outflow is the portfolio adjustments by institutional seats. Fidelity's FBTC was redeemed by $153 million in just one day, and even BlackRock's IBIT, which has always acted as a liquidity black hole, experienced net outflows. Conversely, Bitwise's BITB managed to absorb a small inflow of $2.21 million against this freezing market trend. This pattern of top-tier emitters being collectively drained, with mid-sized tools patched sporadically by buyers, indicates that traditional arbitrage funds and macro hedge funds are undergoing a very specific position liquidation.
Many watching the market attribute the cause to inflation data exceeding expectations and repeated interest rate hike expectations, but if you break down the asset allocation logic of these traditional asset managers, macro indicators are merely surface triggers for risk control.
A large portion of the underlying buyers of Ethereum and Bitcoin spot ETFs treat this channel as a high Beta liquidity bridge tool. #特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 #台积电Q3净利润超预期，盈利创历史新高 TSMC's Q3 net profit surged 68.7% to a new quarterly high, but the impressive earnings report requires a nuanced perspective.
Positive factors: AI chip demand continues to explode, advanced process revenue share reached 79%, 2nm mass production contributed to revenue, and high-margin advanced processes drove profit growth significantly outpacing revenue.
Risks: Performance is highly tied to major AI clients, with demand concentration being relatively high; ongoing capital expenditure increases due to the Arizona plant construction in the U.S., and geopolitical factors bring long-term uncertainty. Meanwhile, TSM stock in the U.S. market has a trading logic of profit realization after positive news, so the stock price may not necessarily rise in sync with earnings in the short term. In the long run, the ramp-up of advanced process capacity and sustained customer demand are the core determinants of future valuation.Inflation hits, leverage bloodbath, tech stocks party—did you hold on to today's market?
Yesterday's market can't be summed up with just "volatility."
CPI just exceeded expectations, and PPI followed with an even bigger shock—year-on-year soaring to 6.3%, the highest since December 2022. The month-on-month increase of 1.3% is more than double the expected 0.6%, and core PPI didn't slack off either, jumping from 4.7% to 5.0% year-on-year. Gasoline rose 20.3% in a month, diesel up 21%, energy prices are like pressure in the veins, pushing from the oil fields all the way to the checkout counter.
Honestly, I was a bit stunned when the data came out. The market was even more stunned—the probability of a rate hike before year-end shot up to around 90%, and the implied probability of a rate hike in October jumped from less than 18% a week ago to about 34%. The pricing on CME FedWatch flipped overnight.
The "fake rebound" of BTC
$BTC dropped to $79,694 last night, just shy of 80,000, then was forcibly pulled back above 82,000. Looks fierce, right? But I advise you to stay calm.
In the past 24 hours, the whole network liquidated $929 million, with longs accounting for $777 million. This is not a "healthy wash," it's a small meat grinder. Glassnode also issued a warning: although the price has recovered, liquidity support below 80,000 is clearly thinning, with buy orders mostly hanging around 78,000, which is passive defense, not active offense.
In plain terms: this rebound relies on short covering and low-level catching, not genuine bullish buying.
On the chart, BTC is tugging between 81,000 and 82,400, $ETH is weaker, moving in a 2,360–2,440 range like a frog in warm water, and $SOL is stuck around 103, neither up nor down. The total market cap dropped about 3%, but volume increased by 35%—what does this mean? Bulls and bears are fiercely fighting, and no one is giving in.
The Fear & Greed Index retreated from greed a few days ago to neutral, just over 50. From a sentiment perspective, this position is healthier than the "greedy" days, but no one should fool themselves into thinking this is a bottom signal.
A noteworthy signal: funds are quietly moving
There’s an interesting on-chain data point today—a certain whale/institution address sold a total of 1,601 $BTC over 5 days, exchanged for 132 million USDC, then bought 53,095 $ETH at an average price of $2,497.
Honestly, this move tempts me. Although $ETH is being suppressed hard now, big money continuously moving into $ETH at this level shows someone has their own judgment on $ETH’s odds. But don’t rush to follow; ETF data still shows net outflows for $ETH, and institutions overall lean more toward $BTC.
$BTC ETFs have net inflows of $2.09 billion in the past 30 days, while $ETH has net outflows of $319 million, and $SOL net outflows of $33.2 million. Funds are selective, not fully retreating.
Tech stocks are a completely different world
TSMC’s Q3 net profit hit 763 billion New Taiwan Dollars, a year-on-year surge of 68.7%, setting a record high and surpassing market expectations. Demand for AI and semiconductors is as solid as iron.
Netflix is a bit more complicated. Q3 revenue guidance is up 12%, and ad revenue is expected to double this year to about $3 billion. The ad package’s monthly active viewers have exceeded 250 million. But after Q2 earnings, the stock dropped 8%, showing the market is sensitive to "growth slowing."
See, on one side macro inflation is crushing risk assets, on the other tech leaders are raking in huge profits. This is the market’s split feeling in 2026—money isn’t lacking, but its courage is shrinking.
What about today?
My feeling is summed up in one word: grind.
Not a crash, but not a reversal either. Leverage has been cleaned out, sentiment cooled, and the market is waiting for the FOMC decision on October 28. Before that, $BTC will likely grind back and forth between 80,000 and 83,000, and $ETH and $SOL need to see ETF funds stop bleeding before they can run independently.
If you’re itching to trade, go ahead, but don’t get carried away. The real winners aren’t those who trade frequently in volatility, but those who hold back when others are anxious.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ #台积电Q3净利润超预期，盈利创历史新高 #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 1. Macro: Stagflation pattern confirmed, sharp increase in rate hike pressure. September CPI year-on-year at 3.7%, core CPI at 2.6%, both exceeding expectations. Subsequently, PPI rose 1.3% month-on-month and 6.3% year-on-year, marking the largest increases since March and December 2022 respectively; core PPI rose 0.7% month-on-month and 5% year-on-year. Energy inflation has fully penetrated from upstream producers to consumers. CME FedWatch shows about a 34% chance of a rate hike in October, with nearly 90% expectation of at least one hike before year-end. Among 13 major brokerages, 12 bet on a 25bp hike in December; Bank of America even predicts one hike each in October and December. The FOMC meeting on October 27-28 is the next key milestone. 2. BTC: Deep V-shaped rebound, but structure remains fragile. BTC currently around 82,348, up 0.75% in 24h, with an intraday low of 79,694 before a V-shaped rebound to 82,520. In the past 24h, total liquidations across the network reached 929 million, with longs accounting for 777 million; BTC longs liquidated amounted to 172 million. ETF funds continue to bleed. On October 15, BTC spot ETF net outflow was 262 million; cumulative net outflow this week is 151 million, following a net outflow of 681 million the previous week. Institutions are withdrawing; the rebound relies on short covering and liquidity release after leverage clearing, not active spot buying. Regarding whales, a trader opened a long position of 187 million USD at maximum leverage, holding 1,822 BTC longs, entry price 82,409, liquidation price 80,634, close to the current price.#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins #Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus 🚨 In 2026, do we really need to be wary of market risks?
Looking back at the US midterm election years over the past few decades, the market has indeed experienced significant pullbacks multiple times.
According to the historical data listed in the original text, there were declines exceeding 16% in 2002, 2018, and 2022.
But past trends do not guarantee a repeat in the future, nor can we assert that 98% of people will lose all their assets in 2026 based on this.
For $BTC investors, what truly matters is:
📉 Will the US stock market experience a sustained decline?
💵 Is liquidity tightening?
🐋 Are large funds accumulating positions or continuously withdrawing?
Don't treat historical statistics as inevitable prophecy.
Bull markets require offensive strategies, while bear markets demand risk contingency plans. Ethereum ETF stops falling, but that doesn't mean institutions are buying up
$ETH spot ETF has fallen for ten consecutive days, finally turning positive on October 13.
Net inflow of $24.84 million, which is not a large amount.
Where did this money come from:
Grayscale Mini contributed $16.73 million, Fidelity contributed $8.1 million.
Together, these two accounted for almost the entire volume that day.
How is this number calculated:
Bitmine holds 6.02 million $ETH, accounting for 4.9% of the entire network.
Just 77,000 $ETH short of 5%, a little more buying will reach the limit.
After reaching the limit, it can no longer buy at the current pace.
That $24.84 million is filled in by others, not new money entering the market.
When buying pressure reaches the top, the price depends on the remaining people to take over.
#渣打开放BTC与ETH交易，银行加密业务扩展
#$ETH US September PPI rose 1.3% month-over-month, far above the roughly 0.5% expected, with wholesale gasoline prices up 20.3% in a single month. Despite such hot inflation, the probability of a rate hike in October dropped from 33% to 27%.
Why? Retail sales increased by +0.8%, mostly supported by gas stations; excluding gasoline and other items, the "control group" only rose +0.1%, indicating consumption is not that strong; plus, the market worries that AI-driven borrowing will drag down the economy, so funds fled into US Treasuries, causing the 10-year yield to drop about 10 basis points.
Inflation hasn't eased, but the market is starting to fear the economy more. The yield decline is not a signal to increase leverage.
#台积电Q3净利润超预期，盈利创历史新高 The day after the spring reversal: The "false breakdown → spring reversal" on October 15th becomes even more striking after 15M data correction — the downtrend segment Delta was -1.67 billion (panic), the reversal segment 10-hour Delta +2.90 billion (the strongest buying since the peak on September 21), net +1.52 billion for the whole day, with a turnover of 25.5 billion. This morning's early session saw volume contraction and consolidation (2.3 billion, +0.1 billion), with the price steady at 82,100 — a textbook Wave ② retracement confirmation in progress, Wave ③ gearing up, targeting the fifth test of the Iron Curtain. 1. Dow Theory The low point sequence completes the "false breakdown + higher low" bottom confirmation prototype: From the Dow perspective, 79,700 on 10-15 is a classic footnote of a false breakdown — intraday new low (79,700 < 80,316), but the closing price that day at 82,392 not only reclaimed the double bottom zone (80,300-80,960) but also stood above the box midpoint 82,300 and the lower edge of the VA. In Dow Theory, a "new low recovered intraday + closing at a high level" constitutes a key reversal day, and its low point sequence begins to show textbook bottom characteristics: 80,316 → 80,960 → 79,700 (range -644 → -260, sharply converging) and all fully reclaimed by buyers. Current structure: The highs at 84,262/84,350 (four previous rejections) have not yet been challenged, but the Dow "higher low" chain (81,843 this morning's low > 79,700) has preliminarily formed. Dow confirmation line:#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins
Netflix can sustain revenue growth, but the primary driver is shifting from raw subscriber volume to monetization—specifically periodic price increases, expanded Average Revenue per Member and international market growth as paid-sharing tailwinds normalize.
The ad-supported tier represents a major long-term growth engine, driven by the rollout of Netflix's proprietary ad-tech stack, expanded programmatic capabilities, and increasing ad-tier membership.$BTC experienced a pullback near $80,000, and the market's patience for the next rally has clearly diminished.
The previously repeatedly anticipated scenario was Bitcoin breaking upwards, with altcoins generally following the rise. However, the market did not deliver this smooth trend; the ongoing volatility has instead amplified unease.
Whether this round of fluctuation is a brief correction or the beginning of a larger-scale oscillation, there is currently insufficient evidence to conclude. Until the market confirms, do not mistake expectations for facts.$UNI, always claiming to be the "King of DeFi" and the "Pioneer of Decentralized Exchanges." Let's see it back at $5 this year!
The Uniswap protocol itself is indeed strong, consistently topping the charts in trading volume and fees, but what about this token? It feels more like a vase propped up by the protocol's halo—shouting "value capture" for over five years, yet most of the time it's just a voting tool. Token holders watch helplessly as the protocol rakes in profits while their own pockets remain empty.
Let's talk about your "governance token" trick first. In 2020, you airdropped a bunch, claiming the community was in charge. But in reality, large holders, the team, and early investors hold concentrated stakes, with voting power highly centralized. Ordinary people’s voices are negligible. Proposal approval rates look good, but participation is abysmal. You boast decentralization, but it’s more like a show performed by a few big holders and the foundation, with token holders just as background props.
Now, about value capture. The protocol generates billions daily in fees, yet you’ve long treated the "Fee Switch" like a suspense novel. It wasn’t finally turned on until the end of 2025, with a one-time burn of 100 million tokens and a bit of ongoing burning. Sounds exciting, right? But the actual effect? The burn rate is as slow as squeezing toothpaste, with an annual impact possibly only a fraction of a percent, nowhere near enough to support the post-rally fantasies. The price crashed from nearly $45 in 2021 to just over $7 now, a drop of more than 80%. Token holders watch the protocol thrive while enduring the embarrassment of the token lagging behind fundamentals.
$UNI #HOODQ3TradingGrowth robinhood chain, robinhood's blockchain where users trade stock tokens, saw dex volume fall 30% to $6.35b in october 6-12. but defi tvl rose to $1.058b from september 30 to october 12, and morpho, a lending protocol, held $486.8m of open loans there. so lending is now a large use, not only trading. that week, borrowers paid about $417k in interest and liquidation bonuses on morpho, but morpho recorded zero protocol revenue.CoreWeave dropped 15.5% on Wednesday, CDS soared past 1000 basis points, and the market is pricing in a 63% five-year default probability, with the timeline all shouting that the AI infrastructure leverage has collapsed.
But contract revenue backlog is 129 billion, with Meta and OpenAI accounting for the majority. Bank of America has a buy target price of 140, while the bond market thinks it's close to death and analysts believe it can double, all looking at the same financial report...
Its model is to borrow money to stockpile GPUs, package them into computing power services, sign long-term contracts, and lease them out. The higher the leverage, the greater the certainty it can provide, but also the more fragile it becomes. Now that capital costs are soaring, it's essentially a stress test for this model. There's a detail many haven't noticed: Nvidia has a backstop agreement to take over any computing power it can't sell before 2032, which might be the most critical safety net in the whole story.
The panic narrative is too crude. If the contract backlog can be realized on schedule, interest coverage is just a matter of timing. The keyword is "if"—let's watch first.
Data is based on publicly disclosed information from various parties and does not constitute investment advice. #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 The financial report has already shown growth, so this bet doesn't seem very meaningful #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins
Earnings season is about expectations, not results.
Netflix (NFLX) reports Oct 21 AMC. A 72% Yes on beat tells me the market already expects good news. So the question is: what's left to surprise on?
My checklist:
- Ad tier user share
- Ad inventory fill rate
- Margin guidance
If guidance is just in line, I expect a muted or negative reaction even with a beat. If the ad numbers surprise, that's where the upside is. #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点
On October 20th, Netflix's earnings report revealed that the real focus isn't the $12.86 billion revenue, but rather the advertising, subscriptions, and layoffs behind it—whether it's still worth holding onto.
This earnings report shows the market expects revenue around $12.86 billion, a year-over-year increase of about 12%; operating margin is forecasted at 33.2%, higher than last year's 28.2%. The numbers aren't bad, but the stock price has dropped about 40% this year, indicating the market's concern isn't about "making money," but whether growth can continue at the same pace.
Three key points to watch:
1. Can the advertising business support a second growth curve?
Netflix expects advertising revenue to approach $3 billion by 2026, nearly doubling. However, the ARPU for ad-supported plans remains lower than pure subscription users. The scale of advertising, advertiser demand, and progress in interactive ads will all impact valuation recovery.
2. Does subscription growth still have momentum?
Password sharing crackdowns and price hike benefits are weakening, with user watch time increasing only 2% in the first half of the year. The Q4 guidance is more important than Q3 data: if the full-year guidance of $51 billion to $51.4 billion can be steadily achieved, it will stabilize the situation.
3. Layoffs of 1,000 employees: cost-cutting and efficiency improvement or growth anxiety?
Layoffs are concentrated in product, technology, legal, and HR, about 6% of the workforce. This is a short-term boost to profit margins but also indicates management acknowledges "growth isn't as fast as imagined." To some extent, Papertrade's mechanism of directly converting traders' PnL into protocol capital does have certain merits.
Nearly a week after launch, Papertrade Traders' cumulative PnL has reached -$55 million, with more than half of the losses concentrated on the first day. The most recent full trading day recorded a PnL of -$7.43 million.
The daily proportion of profitable addresses is only about 20-25%, meaning only 1 out of every 4-5 traders is profitable.
The average loss is far greater than the median; most daily average losses exceed $1k, while the daily median loss is just tens of dollars. The loss distribution shows a clear long tail, with a small number of addresses bearing larger losses.
Papertrade now triggers tens of thousands of liquidations daily, but these losses do not simply vanish—they flow into the protocol LP to pay winners, replenish the repayment queue, and mint PAPER for the losers. When the LP exceeds its cap, the surplus is distributed to PAPER stakers Ethereum rebounds to $2438, but bulls are still "paying" to hold positions
ETH pulled back from a low of $2323 to $2438, rising nearly 4% intraday.
What changed? On the surface, it's a rebound, but underneath it's a different story: In the past 24 hours, the entire network saw $292 million in ETH liquidations, with Binance alone accounting for over $157 million, and bulls making up more than 80%. More importantly, the funding rate remains negative—averaging about -0.0010%, with Binance dropping to -0.0013%.
Why is this worth noting? The price is rising, but leveraged bulls are being "charged" the cost of holding their positions. The ETF side is also not optimistic: Ethereum spot ETFs saw a net outflow of about $130 million in a single day, expanding to $190 million for the week.
Which observation is more supported currently? This looks more like a "passive deleveraging after crowded longs" rather than a healthy trend reversal. Account structure still leans bullish, but active buying accounts for only about 42.9%, with Binance active buyers as low as 30%.
Key focus going forward: Whether the liquidation-heavy zone around $2300 will be tested again. If broken, the liquidity vacuum below will be quickly exposed.
A lingering question: When ETFs and leveraged bulls retreat simultaneously, where exactly is the "fuel" for this rebound coming from? $ETH #Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus Bitcoin returns to 82,000, but the support below is disappearing
BTC rebounded from $79,694 to above $82,099 early this morning, rising 1.59% intraday.
What changed? The price seems to have regained ground, but Glassnode on-chain data shows that new buy orders below $80,000 are mainly concentrated around $78,000, creating a liquidity vacuum between $80,000 and $78,000. Meanwhile, the funding rate has dropped to -0.0046%, indicating a bearish zone.
Why is this worth noting? The price is rising below, but the underlying buying support for this rebound is actually thinning. The rebound is mainly driven by short covering and triggered passive buy orders, rather than active chasing funds.
Which observation is more supported currently? This looks more like a technical correction after a macro shock, rather than a trend reversal. Spot ETFs saw a net outflow of about $262 million yesterday, and institutions have not fully returned.
The key focus next: whether the $78,000 defense line can hold — once the support breaks, it will quickly become a vacuum.
A cliffhanger: When retail search interest drops to a multi-year low, where exactly is the "fuel" for this rebound coming from? $BTC SAND Uptrend Analysis
SAND is the token of the metaverse blockchain game The Sandbox, classified as a sector rotation type coin. This round of price increase is driven by the resonance of sector narrative, capital, and contracts.
1. Narrative Catalyst: Metaverse/WEB3 Gaming Sector Rotation
After the market stabilizes, capital flows out from mainstream coins and returns to the long-term oversold metaverse and blockchain gaming sectors.
- The Sandbox is backed by Animoca Brands' parent company, has numerous well-known brand IP collaborations, and operates virtual land (LAND) business. It is a leading target in the metaverse sector, benefiting first from the sector's warming popularity.
- There is no major independent positive news; the movement is more of an oversold rebound logic. Historically, it has fallen significantly from its highs, with chips positioned very low, high elasticity, and capital prefers to bottom-fish oversold old altcoins.
2. Spot Capital Aspect
1. Whales accumulate at low levels, coins flow out from exchanges, and are hoarded off-exchange; the circulating supply is not large, so it does not require massive capital to drive the market.
2. Sector Effect: Metaverse coins like MANA strengthen simultaneously, attracting retail investors to follow the profit-making trend, concentrating spot buy orders.
3. Contract Side (Accelerator of the Uptrend)
1. A large number of short positions accumulated at low levels previously. When the price breaks through key resistance levels upward, it triggers a short squeeze, forcing shorts to stop loss and buy to close, further pushing up the price.
2. After the rise, the funding rate turns positive, attracting many chasing long positions, and incremental contract capital boosts the price increase;
#闪迪财报前夕，HBF与存储紧缺引发热议