Orbit Post Sitemap
Gold, silver, and $BTC are all facing pressure as capital rotates toward the relative safety of 5%+ U.S. Treasury yields. The key question isn’t simply why gold is falling — it’s what happens to yields from here. If Treasury yields push higher, financial conditions could tighten further and keep pressure on risk assets. As we head into the Chinese New Year period 🧧, I’m watching rates, liquidity, and capital flows closely before adding more exposure to BTC. The market can change quickly. Can yo$TRUMP TRUMP coin is purely an emotional gamble. Every time election news comes out, it jumps up and down. I have previously traded a few waves based on the news, making quick profits and losses. This kind of coin has no faith, only interests. Now I just treat it as a news indicator and only glance at it when there is major news.
【Revenue Nature】
Purely a political Meme or concept coin. No actual revenue, relying entirely on hype and consensus.
【Market and Trend Forecast】
The trend is completely tied to political news.
🔮 Prediction for tomorrow and the day after: If there is no related news tomorrow, it will likely drift downwards. Short-term traders with very high risk appetite can pay attention.Hyperliquid's TVL has surpassed $7 billion for the first time, with perpetual contract trading volume around $220 billion during the same period.
Putting these two numbers side by side is interesting: a $7 billion TVL supports $220 billion in trading volume, indicating its capital turnover efficiency far exceeds that of traditional centralized exchanges — the same margin is reused multiple times within a single day.
The source of this efficiency is the on-chain full margin and unified account design.
Its significance is not just another DEX breaking records, but proving that doing derivatives on-chain can match CEX in capital efficiency.
Next to watch is whether this structure can withstand cascading liquidations during extreme market conditions.$MSTR
BTC remains near $80,000, so why might MSTR still face pressure?
MSTR is influenced by BTC price, financing costs, and net asset value premium of held coins. The 10-year US Treasury yield has risen to 5.20%, significantly increasing valuation pressure on the capital structure.
If BTC rises and ETF inflows recover, but MSTR continues to lag, it indicates the market is compressing its premium.
Only when BTC demand strengthens and financing conditions stabilize, and the stock’s relative net asset value no longer weakens, will its leverage characteristic become an advantage again. It is not simply a BTC multiple tool.ONE long grid, opened 10x leverage, only ran for 3 hours and 42 minutes, directly hit -30.61%, strategy stopped immediately.
I used to think grid trading could make money by just holding, but this time I really learned a lesson.
Grid trading is only good for sideways markets; when facing a one-sided sharp drop, losses come too fast under high leverage.Ethereum's Glamsterdam upgrade at the end of the year aims, among other things, to gradually bring the mainnet closer to the low fees and high throughput currently seen on Layer 2s like Base and Robinhood Chain.
If L1 itself becomes fast and cheap, the biggest reason for Layer 2's existence is cut in half.
The value proposition of L2s over the past two years has been "help Ethereum scale," but now the mainnet is taking action itself.
This is good news for ETH holders: value capture flows back to the main chain, making the staking and burning narrative more sustainable.
L2s will have to answer a new question—besides being cheaper, what else do you offer?$ETH
The 15-minute chart is currently showing a slightly volatile and bearish trend.
The price is around 2676, having already dropped to the lower Bollinger Band near 2675.5,
indicating that short-term bearish pressure remains.
You can't just chase shorts here because the price is running close to the lower band.
Below, 2670–2665 is the first support zone,
and the truly critical level is 2649–2650.
If it can hold steady around 2670,
ETH is likely to first rebound to 2685–2690;
conversely, if 2670 is decisively broken down, the market will likely continue to seek support lower.
Although bearish, I can't resist entering a long position,
focusing on a contrarian trading approach.Three major investments, not a single one avoided
Hu Zhewen invested about $80 million into $LUNA and its stablecoin.
At its peak, the account was worth over 800 million.
Where did the money go:
The stablecoin maintains $1 through an algorithm.
When someone sells, it burns another coin to support the price.
When it can't hold, both coins fall together.
Who's on the other side:
He sued Jump Trading, claiming at least 500 million in damages.
He believes the market maker knew about the crash in advance.
Later, he invested in Zhang Yongfeng's project.
Millions of dollars, dropped 99.6%.
The stablecoin's $1 isn't backed by reserves, it's calculated.
On the other side of the equation stands people.
#稳定币新规推进，支付结算加速落地 $LUNA Deribit $100 Billion Options Settle Today, $BTC Volatility About to Explode
Today marks a critical juncture in the crypto market—$159 billion worth of BTC options and $21 billion worth of ETH options on the Deribit platform are expiring simultaneously, totaling $180 billion, which accounts for 37% of the platform's BTC open interest. Such a massive settlement guarantees that today's market will not be calm.
From the options structure perspective, the put/call ratio is 0.7, indicating that call option positions significantly outnumber puts, with bullish sentiment prevailing. However, caution is needed: bullish dominance does not necessarily mean prices will rise. Before and after option settlement, market makers' hedging and rebalancing often trigger sharp spikes and short-term volatility, and the direction may not align with sentiment.
Historical experience shows that large option expirations are often accompanied by a sudden surge in volatility, with prices potentially swinging up and down within the settlement window to clear high-leverage positions. Heavy speculative positions at this time carry extremely high risk and can easily be forced out during spikes.
Strategically, it is recommended to reduce position sizes, widen stop losses, or wait for the settlement to complete and volatility to subside before seeking trend opportunities. $ETH and $ZEC and other assets may also be affected by correlation, so avoid blindly chasing rallies or panicking sell-offs. Remember: on settlement day, surviving is more important than how much you make.
#美联储重启加息，BTC为何仍有韧性？ #美债长端利率持续攀升，融资压力升温 Today is the weekend, and market liquidity is naturally weaker than on weekdays, so I’m not really expecting a particularly large one-sided move today.
BTC has now returned to around 84,000. Earlier, it surged up near 87,000 but then pulled back, yet it’s still holding around 84,000 for the time being. If this level can hold steady, I’m still leaning towards a slightly strong consolidation in the short term.
What’s really worth watching is not whether it can rally directly today, but whether it can hold around 84,000 over the weekend. As long as it doesn’t fall back below 82,000, this round of pullback can’t be easily defined as a trend reversal.
During the low-volume weekend, sudden dumps or sudden rallies don’t necessarily indicate the true direction; instead, we need to wait for next week when funds re-enter the market to see the real choice.
So I won’t change the big picture based on one day’s volatility. First watch 84,000, then 82,000; only if it reclaims 86,500–87,000 above will the market truly reopen space.
At this stage, patience is more important than guessing the daily ups and downs.⚖️ A $292M bridge hack just turned into a personal lawsuit
KelpDAO didn't just go after LayerZero — it named CEO Bryan Pellegrino personally
Here's the detail most people are skipping past 👀 $BTC
The claim, filed in British Columbia, alleges LayerZero reviewed and approved KelpDAO's rsETH deployment in writing, then failed to disclose risks in its own security infrastructure before it was compromised
Pellegrino's response? Meritless — and he says he'll defend it in Vancouver
$ETH ETH hourly chart is still suppressed by the moving average system, the death cross structure has not been repaired, and the current price around 2677 is not enough to support a reversal.
The area from 2700 to 2720 above is the densest liquidation zone for short positions, with continuous selling pressure on the order book. This position is prone to first spike upward to clear high-leverage short positions before falling back. While waiting for the red light, I glanced at my phone with one foot on the ground; large orders in the order book still lean bearish.
The strategy is to only short on rebounds. Enter short positions in batches within the 2703 to 2718 range, with a stop loss at 2732, first take profit at 2632, and if broken, target 2604.
If the price does not rebound and directly breaks below 2658, it indicates the start of long position liquidations below. A rebound near 2668 can be used to add shorts, with a stop loss at 2682 and a target of 2620.
If this trade doesn't work out, I won't even be able to afford the battery rental fee tomorrow.
$ETH
#美债收益率全面走高，高利率为何难降？
@OKX星球 *Bitcoin Latest - September 25 $84,166*
*Contract positions surge 23%, but no need to panic*
In the past 2 months, Bitcoin contract positions have increased by 23%, causing many to worry about excessive leverage and a potential crash.
*The truth:*
1. *Only $47 billion now, still far from the peak*
At the peak of $126,080 in October 2025, positions were $72 billion. Now at $47 billion, $25 billion less, not high at all.
2. *This $87K rally wasn’t driven by contracts, but by spot buying*
Contracts increased by $9 billion, but ETF spot bought $2.6 billion in 5 days. Spot is the real money; contracts just follow the trend.
This explains why whales sold $470 million, yet the price still held at $84K.
3. *Funding rate is normal*
The current funding rate is 0.008%, neutral. Not as crazy as the 0.03% at the peak.
*In short:*
Leverage is rising, but nowhere near danger zone. Spot whales are absorbing the supply, this rally has support, not just empty moves.
$82K holds, looking at $90K.This week's profits have been like going downstairs; yesterday's short position got stuck, and it was only this morning that I broke even. Family, should we keep holding?
---
Brothers, look at the screenshot.
This week's asset curve looks exactly like going downstairs, sliding from 1722 all the way down to 1542, a drawdown of nearly 200, which really feels bad. Yesterday, I opened a BTC short at 84,179, but it was directly pulled up and trapped overnight. I held on all night and only barely returned to the cost line this morning. Finally broke even.
📊 Market Analysis:
BTC is struggling repeatedly around 84,000. The 84,100-84,300 range is extremely unclear in direction. The 84,500-85,000 zone above is a strong resistance area, and 82,900 below is short-term support.
After failing to break through 87,374, the market has fallen into a high-level sideways consolidation. Volume is shrinking, both bulls and bears are watching cautiously, a typical "night before a trend change." At times like this, it's easiest to get stabbed back and forth, with both sides suffering losses.
🎯 Trading Strategy:
Keep a close eye on the 82,900 support and 84,500 resistance. If volume breaks below 82,900, continue holding shorts with a target of 81,000; if it rebounds and stands above 84,500, it means the short position judgment was wrong, so decisively cut losses and exit.
Breaking even is just the first step; truly putting profits in your pocket counts as winning. This market is tough for both bulls and bears, so control your position size, guard your stop loss, and don't let this week's downward trend continue.
$BTC $ETH
#美联储重启加息，BTC为何仍有韧性？ #财报观察员：好市多业绩超预期，美光接棒 #美债长端利率持续攀升，融资压力升温 $XRP RIPPED TO 1.6583 THEN GOT REJECTED HARD.
Price round-tripped from that spike back to 1.5316, now flat on the day at -0.19%. 24h range sits 1.4520–1.5609, tighter than the wick suggests. I've learned spikes that reverse fast rarely hold on the first retest. Is this basing or exhaustion?
#MetaMuseMonetization *Bitcoin Latest - September 25 $84.5K*
*Whales made $470 million in one day*
Today BTC surged to $84.5K, but on-chain data shows whales took profits of $470 million in one day, more than yesterday's $356 million.
*Why isn't this a major crash?*
If it were a real dump, the $470 million sell orders would have pushed the price down to $82K.
Instead, the price rose from $83K to $84.5K.
Explanation: *Someone absorbed the entire $470 million at $84K.*
Who absorbed it? ETFs + institutional treasuries. Sellers were retail and short-term whales; buyers were long-term large holders.
*Don't short recklessly now*
The three whales who reversed to short at $84.2K yesterday are now losing money at $84.5K.
There are $900 million in short positions above $85K ready to be liquidated; if $85K is broken, shorts will be squeezed, pushing price directly to $87.4K.
*In short:*
Massive profit-taking but price doesn't fall, it rises = someone is absorbing the sell-off, very strong.
Chasing shorts now is very risky and likely to get squeezed.
Hold $84K, next target is $85K. Many people think that once an asset is "on-chain," it's considered a success, but that's actually just the first step.
The real challenge lies in the subsequent steps:
Whether it can be counted as client assets by futures brokers, accepted as collateral by clearinghouses, and included within banks' regulatory capital frameworks.
Currently, discussions in the U.S. have delved deeply into backend processes like client fund management, collateral, and capital measurement, indicating that tokenization is evolving from "being visible in a wallet" to "being included on the balance sheet."
The gap between these two stages is the true entry barrier for institutional capital.
To assess the prospects of an RWA project, it's more reliable to see how far it has progressed in these backend processes than to look at how many tokens it has issued.The main structure has topped out, but the curtain wall anchor points are failing—$IMX right now is like a building that must immediately have a stop-work sign hung.
A 24-hour rise of 3.56% looks like another floor was added on top, but when I flipped to the last page of the structural calculation book: the short-term RSI has climbed to 68.2, right at the overbought warning zone, and the 1-hour level has directly triggered a sell signal; the mid-term RSI is only 52.8, and the two load stages are completely out of sync in vibration mode. What does this mean? The upper floors are desperately adding more construction, while the lower shear walls show no response—a typical eccentric stress condition. When the wind load presses down, the cantilever end will collapse first.
The Bollinger Bands make it even clearer: the short-term price has already reached 111% within the band, with only 0.3% clearance left at the upper band, meaning the steel beam has hit the red line; another 0.3% up and it will hit the wall; the lower band still has a 3.4% buffer. The mid-term price is at 89%, with only 0.5% clearance at the upper band and 4.4% buffer at the lower band. Both models give the same conclusion: the upward structural margin has been completely consumed, and the live load on the floor is fully pressing on the most unfavorable span.
My handling plan: do not chase the high, wait for a first pullback to the design elevation before taking action.
📉 Short:
Entry: 0.13 (current price +2.7%)
Take Profit 1: 0.12 (-6.2%)
Take Profit 2: 0.12 (-4.2%)
Stop Loss: 0.14 (+13.2%)
The stop loss leaves a 13.2% buffer from the current price, which I deliberately set as a seismic joint—because the short-term RSI hasn’t truly broken 70 yet, the main force could still add another floor to lure buyers. But as long as the risk exposure is kept within the structural allowable stress, this pullback is a clean window for dismantling and modification.
What truly determines the project’s value is never drawn on the renderings. The white paper is just a design drawing; there are plenty of people who can make it look pretty. What decides whether this building can stand for twenty years is the foundation depth, the reinforcement ratio of the load-bearing walls, the concrete curing records, and the construction discipline of the development team. I recognize $IMX’s ecological blueprint, but the reinforcement ratio on this current floor cannot support the current elevation.
If the elevation doesn’t match, then dismantle.$DOGE REJECTED AT 0.10589 — AND IT SHOWS.
After tapping that high, price dropped fast and now sits at 0.09525, down 0.56% today. Weekly gain holds at +8.90%, 90-day up 27.83%. That wick taught me rejections punish latecomers hard. Is this consolidation building a base, or a pause before more downside?
#CostcoBeatsMicronNext UNI and ARB just got hit as the market pulled back ~3%. My take: $UNI looks more like a market-driven pullback. Strong DEX positioning + fee generation give it a clearer fundamental story. $ARB is different. The ecosystem remains important, but token unlocks can add extra supply pressure and make the downside more violent. I’m not blindly buying red candles. I’d rather see support hold + volume return + BTC stabilize before adding risk. UNI = watch the fundamentals. ARB = watch the supply. #UNI #美联储重启加息，BTC为何仍有韧性？ 🤔
On the surface, this seems contradictory. Textbooks say that rate hikes drain liquidity, risk-free yields soar, and non-yielding assets like BTC should collapse. But in reality, BTC has indeed held firm around 83,000 instead of crashing.
Why? Three fundamental logics have changed.
First, the buying structure this time is different. Now BTC is backed by ETFs, corporate treasuries, and national strategic reserves. These funds buy coins not for short-term speculation but to hedge sovereign currency credit risk. With US debt surpassing 40 trillion and growing, it actually strengthens BTC’s long-term narrative.
Second, the market has priced this in advance. Rate hike expectations have been speculated on for over half a year; the leverage that needed to exit has already done so, leaving more stable holders. After the negative news landed, the panic was less than expected.
Third, selling pressure from miners and long-term holders is very light. On-chain dormant supply has hit a record high, with large amounts of BTC locked in cold wallets not participating in circulation. The actual tradable supply is much less than before.
But resilience does not mean an immediate surge.
Rate hike pressure remains, US Treasury yields are still high, and no large off-exchange capital is entering aggressively. The market will likely consolidate sideways to digest this. Spot holders with base positions should hold steady; contract traders shouldn’t go heavy long just because of “resilience.” Until a clear direction emerges, sudden spikes will teach a lesson.
BTC’s resilience is a good thing, but don’t mistake resilience for fuel. ⚖️
Do you think BTC can withstand this rate hike cycle?👇$BTC Cross-chain bridges get hacked, and in the end, the project team and the bridge team sue each other in court. Is this new?
Not new.
But what's interesting this time is that KelpDAO directly sued LayerZero and its co-founders together.
To put it simply: the bridge was breached, the money is gone, now someone has to be held responsible.
KelpDAO's claim is that LayerZero knew about the technical vulnerabilities long ago, but neither warned anyone nor stopped it.
LayerZero had been shifting the blame outward for months.
But KelpDAO says, in black and white, you reviewed and approved this configuration at the start.
So the question is.
Who will win this lawsuit? Unknown.
What impact does this have on ordinary people like us? Basically none in the short term.
But what’s really worth watching is another matter: in the future, if a cross-chain bridge has issues, who is ultimately responsible?
Before, hackers took the blame; now the responsibility is starting to shift to the infrastructure providers.
Once this direction is established, the way bridges operate might have to change.
Who do you think should take the blame?
#稳定币新规推进，支付结算加速落地
#美股探索代币化与全天候交易 $HYPE The US stock market is starting to get serious; tokenization and around-the-clock trading are no longer just concepts.
On September 22, the CFTC chairman directly addressed New York, saying that financial markets must prepare for large-scale tokenization, on-chain finance, and 7×24-hour trading. He also made a key point: markets like crypto assets and precious metals might be more suitable for continuous trading, but different assets require different rules. The very next day, the NYSE partnered with a digital asset platform to explore providing tokenized US stocks and ETFs through a digital trading system, and to study a year-round trading model.
This signal is more concrete than the previous SEC exemption for tokenized stocks. Before, it was just opening a door for on-chain trading; now, traditional exchanges are actively stepping in, aiming to move stocks onto the blockchain. If the NYSE really launches tokenized US stocks, the boundary between the US stock market and crypto markets will be completely blurred. Capital can flow within the same system, settlement time will shorten from T+2 to instant, and collateral can be reused across markets.
The question now isn’t whether to go on-chain, but who will be the first to succeed. The CFTC is pushing rules, the NYSE is testing products, and ARK Invest is collaborating with Securitize to create tokenized funds. These three tracks are moving simultaneously, and the direction is very clear. Don’t just focus on candlestick charts; who is building the infrastructure for on-chain assets is what’s truly worth tracking.
$SNDK $BTC $ETH is at a pretty delicate point today. $15 billion worth of BTC options expire tonight, and the bulls have been shouting to push it to 100,000. Whether that happens depends on this move.
BTC is just above 84,000 now, with basically flat gains and losses. Honestly, this in-between feeling is quite uncomfortable, and holders are feeling uneasy. ETH is similar, at 2,679, with no particularly big movements.
However, there's a detail I think is worth noting: ETF inflows have recently turned positive again. Institutions were relatively quiet for a while, but now money is flowing back in. Combined with the current greed index at 71, it feels like smart money is quietly positioning. There's a saying that "hedge funds are buying while retail is selling," though I don't know if that's true. Historically, when such divergence appears, it often precedes a market move.
Of course, option expiration days are really volatile, so short-term traders should watch their positions tonight and avoid getting caught by sudden spikes.
I also recently saw news about a mining company pivoting to AI cloud computing and planning an IPO, which is quite interesting. It seems everyone is looking for new stories. Overall, the market isn't cold right now, but it's not overly excited either. Let's watch and wait for signals. What do you all think? *Latest Bitcoin Update - September 25*
*$BTC $84,200 fluctuating, rotation has begun*
*Bulls and bears are battling:*
*Bullish factors - reasons to hold $83K*
1. *ETF is still buying:* Net inflow this week is over 200 million, not a fake pump
2. *Whales are accumulating:* Yesterday 7 whales sold $356 million, while on the other side big players like Strategy bought 2100 BTC, some selling, some buying
*Bearish factors - why $87K can't be reached*
1. *US Treasury yield at 5.12% is too high:* #FedHikesBTCResilience rate hike risk, money stays out of risk markets
2. *Security concerns:* Exchange hiccups, altcoin sentiment weakens
*How to operate:*
Short term is just fluctuation, don’t chase highs. The $83K-$84.2K box, hold it and buy slowly, if broken watch $82.2K.
ETH $2681 / DOGE $0.095 are both waiting for BTC to choose direction.
*In one sentence: rotation is here, BTC is absorbing liquidity, altcoins are resting.*Your interpretation is very clear-headed, 4500 coins ≠ dumping, this misconception is made by 90% of people.
You broke down the three layers of logic very well:
*1. Source: Four-year-old coins, not new holdings*
More than four years ago, BTC was only 20,000-30,000, now it's 84,000, with a floating profit of 2-3 times. When such wallets move, the market's first reaction is fear, but actually, old coins moving is more likely to be *changing custody/changing cold wallets* rather than running away.
*2. Calculation: 381 million is just market value, not a sell order*
4500 x 84,600 ≈ 381 million, your calculation is correct. But this is just the book value. If it were really dumping, the market depth can absorb 1-2 billion a day, it wouldn't crash just because of one transfer.
*3. Key point: Transfer out ≠ deposit to exchange*
This is your most professional sentence. On-chain is clearly divided:
- Transfer to Coinbase/Binance deposit address = sell pressure preparation
- Transfer to newly created anonymous address/custody address = just moving funds
I checked this transaction, the time you mentioned matches, it is now transferred to a new wallet, not yet into the exchange, so *there is no sell pressure yet*.
Next, just as you said: *watch where it lands.*
Looking at it together with your previous tags makes it clear:
#FedRestartRateHike #StrategyIncreaseHoldings #CMEFuturesLaunch
This shows institutions are still entering, old coins moving is very normal. The resilience lies here, when someone moves, someone else takes over. If tonight's rally is just sentiment recovery rather than new capital inflow, then those chasing tomorrow's highs are likely to be in a tough spot. Do you also hesitate like "rising but can't believe it"? After scanning the market in the middle of the night, I actually woke up. BTC was flat at 83672, down only 0.39%, and no matter how much it was suppressed, it wouldn't budge. ETH barely moved near 2656, dropping 3.14% yesterday but holding firm today, with 2650 like a stepping stone. SOL climbed from 105 to 118, then pulled back to 114.6 after touching 113, up 0.65%. DOGE was even more direct, dropping 5.74% yesterday and rebounding to 0.0943 today, up 1.66%. I stared at these numbers for a long time, and a thought popped into my mind: the market isn't trading "good news," but trading "can't fall." This is interesting. Bitcoin is sideways on the second board, third on the third board slightly higher, and the meme is starting to recover. On the surface, it looks like a broad rally, but in reality, it feels more like funds are testing the waters. ETFs still support SOL; 110 is its psychological defense; ETH staking funds have inflows and outflows, but the price hasn't crashed, indicating selling pressure has been absorbed; DOGE relies purely on sentiment; if 0.09 holds, people dare to play, but this kind of thing comes quickly and goes quickly. What I care about most now isn't who rose much, but whether capital preferences have changed. If funds really spill out from Bitcoin into ETH, SOL, and memes, then the upcoming altcoin recovery rally might be more likelyWhy did interest rates rise? Why did Bitcoin not fall but instead rise? 🧐
This round of the Federal Reserve restarting rate hikes should theoretically be negative for risk assets.
But BTC defies the trend and shows strong resilience.
Key point one: Negative factors have all been priced in advance.
The market has long digested the rate hike expectations, so the actual implementation did not cause an unexpected sell-off.
When negative factors are fully out, it is the best short-term logic for support.
Point two: The BTC capital structure has completely changed.
Spot ETF institutional long-term funds continuously hold a base position to support the bottom.
Institutions do not care about short-term fluctuations from a single rate hike.
Point three: The scarcity hedging logic regains advantage.
Global currency depreciation and high debt pressure persist.
BTC, as a scarce digital asset, has its safe-haven attributes re-evaluated.
High interest rate suppression is limited, and long-term buying continues to support the market.
In summary:
Old cycle rate hikes caused sell-offs; new cycle institutions support the bottom.
The market no longer blindly follows declines; resilience is fully unlocked.
#美联储重启加息，BTC为何仍有韧性？
The above is only a market review and does not constitute investment advice. DYOR.🚨 $ETH is currently at a high level, and many people are starting to wait for a pullback.
Waiting for a pullback itself is not wrong, but be aware: in a strong market, the price might not give any chance for a deep retracement.
Waiting too long might cause you to chase in at an even higher position.
What really matters is not presetting where the pullback will be, but preparing two plans:
What to do if it pulls back to the demand zone, and what to do if it breaks through directly.
Waiting for only one side makes you vulnerable.
#美联储重启加息，BTC为何仍有韧性？ I personally think the market in the past two months has been quite extreme.
BTC rose from 60,000 to 87,000, a surge of over 40%,
$ETH went from 1800 to 2800, a surge of over 55%,
even $SOL doubled from 60 to 120.
So far, this bull market has had almost no proper pullbacks. The pattern is basically: new highs → high-level consolidation → new highs again.
Moreover, the consensus now is that it’s a bull market; whether on Planet or other platforms, without exception, everyone remains bullish. I actually feel the risk of a downturn is approaching.Happy Mid-Autumn Festival! Your article is so flavorful, and the positions are well-rounded, really hitting the heart 🌕
Exactly right, today is the *Mid-Autumn low volume session*:
*Overview:*
Total market cap 2.89 trillion, volume 107.5 billion, BTC dominance 58.53% — funds have all gone home for the holiday, and the main players are eating mooncakes.
*Mainstream:*
BTC 84,191 -0.27% / ETH 2681 -0.09% just sideways, no one wants to dump on the full moon night, nor chase highs, a perfect holiday consolidation.
*You nailed the details:*
SOL 116.9 +0.50% is actually a holiday feature, thin liquidity, small caps easily run independent trends. Litecoin 68-70 down -4.15% is a typical thin liquidity sweep. DOGE 0.095 -0.43% the dog whales are on holiday too.
Your last two sentences are the essence:
> Holidays combined with the weekend, volume will be even lighter, be cautious chasing highs
> The market won’t disappear because of holidays, opportunities come when everyone returns
Totally agree. Let me add a trading mindset for you:
*During these 3 Mid-Autumn days, watch weekly charts more, intraday less.*
Intraday is noise, weekly charts still show the $80K major support unbroken, long-term bullish unchanged. The real direction will be chosen after next week when ETF funds return + the oil price #USIranRiskPremium settles. $BTC $ETH
The recent hot wallet theft incident at Bitget will cause short-term emotional disturbance, but it is unlikely to reverse the original trends of BTC and ETH. This is a localized risk rather than a systemic crisis. The loss this time is 351.6 million USD, with the platform deploying a 464 million USD protection fund as a backstop. The cold wallets remain intact, user account funds are unaffected, and withdrawals are only temporarily suspended, significantly reducing market panic compared to the Bybit theft.
The impact of the incident is mainly reflected in short-term sentiment. The hacker converted a large amount of stablecoins into ETH, causing short-term abnormal on-chain transactions, but this was merely the hacker moving funds, not genuine buying activity. After the news broke, the market will worry about the custody risks of centralized exchanges, triggering short-term risk-off selling pressure. BTC and ETH may experience a quick, slight pullback with increased volatility. If withdrawals resume smoothly and the root cause report does not reveal serious underlying security vulnerabilities, panic sentiment will be quickly absorbed.
Compared to the 2025 Bybit cold wallet theft, which involved a multi-signature contract vulnerability causing a deep market correction, this time only the hot wallet was compromised, isolating the risk. In the medium to long term, the core drivers of BTC and ETH trends remain macro liquidity and ETF capital flows; exchange thefts are unlikely to change the overall trend.
From a short-term operational perspective, be cautious of sharp drops driven by sentiment but avoid excessive bearishness. The risk lies in prolonged withdrawal suspensions, which could spread panic and exacerbate mainstream coin pullbacks. Overall assessment: increased short-term volatility without changing the original trend. Today there is $17 billion worth of options expiring, but smart money is exiting early.
Deribit quarterly options expire today at 16:00, with a notional value of about $17 billion. Typically, short-term volatility amplifies before expiration as funds hedge in advance.
On-chain, a three-act script of giant whale withdrawals just played out.
Act one: A whale transferred 541,000 HYPE to Kraken 15 minutes ago, worth $49.54 million. This batch was withdrawn from Coinbase Prime half a month ago at an average price of $73.9. Transferred to the exchange today at $91.5, the whale is expected to have made a $9.52 million profit in half a month.
Act two: Another whale consolidated 6,000 ETH into five exchanges including Binance, OKX, and Kraken, worth about $16.1 million. Moving funds across multiple exchanges is usually a standard move preparing to sell.
Act three, the most aggressive: A whale address bc1qln, dormant for over 4 years, suddenly moved 4,500 BTC, worth about $381 million. After 4 years of inactivity, this move involves nearly $400 million in chips.
Making $9.52 million in half a month withdrawals, awakening after 4 years to move $381 million. Large funds are all moving out ahead of expiration.
These three whale moves point to the same signal — before the $17 billion options expiration, smart money is converting chips into stablecoins early.
This is no coincidence; this is defense.
Looking at the market: BTC is around 84,500, ETH around 2,689, total market cap down 2.11% in 24 hours. The three major coins are rebounding, but total market cap is falling, funds are clustering, and most altcoins are bleeding.
This is not a bull comeback; it’s a defensive battle before expiration.
Strategy directly given:
For BTC, 84,000 is the short-term bullish defense line, 87,385 is the iron ceiling. Volatility will amplify around options expiration; don’t bet on direction in the middle, wait for expiration to see the fund flow clearly.
For ETH, 2,600 is short-term support. The whale moves transferring ETH to multiple exchanges are a clear short-term selling pressure signal. Don’t catch the falling knife below 2,600; wait for stabilization.
For HYPE, the whale who made $9.52 million in half a month withdrew at $91.5. Chasing in at this level is carrying these profit-taking chips. Watch the $90 pullback; if it holds, wait and see; if it breaks, it’s short-term funds cashing out.
The logic on expiration day is never "up or down," it’s "who the big money is passing chips to." If they pass them to you today, you take the position; wait for the dust to settle before entering, then you have chips to play with the market makers.
$BTC $ETH $HYPE "Shorting Bitcoin $BTC not only loses on direction, but the high borrowing interest also drains you"
Many retail investors try to cope with market pullbacks by borrowing coins to short, thinking they can make a big profit as long as the coin price falls.
But you often overlook the extremely asymmetric cost disadvantage behind shorting:
1. Invisible daily interest drain: When shorting Bitcoin $BTC on exchanges, you have to pay borrowing interest on the borrowed assets every day. Even if the market remains flat, your principal is continuously eroded by daily lending rates.
2. Lending rate surge when chips are scarce: When the market experiences continuous short squeezes, the available Bitcoin to borrow quickly dries up, and the annualized borrowing rate can skyrocket from a few percent to tens of percent, forcing shorts to be unable to hold long-term.
3. Liquidity squeeze forcing liquidation: Spot holders can wait indefinitely for cycle reversals, but those borrowing coins to short always have the double threat of interest and margin hanging over them. Even if you correctly predict the long-term peak, it’s easy to die in the final frantic rally.
Long positions have unlimited time as an ally, while shorts are fighting a desperate battle against time. Following the long-term appreciation logic of assets is far more in line with survival than counter-trend borrowing to short. $BTC
#美联储重启加息，BTC为何仍有韧性？ #财报观察员：好市多业绩超预期，美光接棒 #美债长端利率持续攀升，融资压力升温 LTC surged 24%, with 1 billion transferred and a golden cross, a typical short squeeze. But BTC spot ETF saw an outflow of 746 million in two days, the CLARITY Act stalled, and the total market cap inflated by 9%. Futures liquidations reached 213 million, with both longs and shorts hit. The market looks lively, but funds are actually picking single points to break through. ETH stands above 2700 while BNB falls, showing clear divergence. Just finished my shift, placed the thermos on the windowsill, and the wind is blowing in through the guard booth crack.
ONDO current price 0.5367, extremely overbought and consolidating at a high level. MACD divergence, momentum exhaustion, heavy short liquidation chips pressuring between 0.545 and 0.555 above. The main force is likely to lure longs to hunt liquidity above, then reverse to smash the market. Short-term rebound space is limited, do not chase the rally.
Trading plan: short between 0.545 and 0.552, stop loss at 0.558, take profit first at 0.520, add to short positions if it breaks 0.518, target 0.495. Defense above 0.560. If it doesn't break 0.520, hold light positions and wait; if it breaks, then strike hard.
$ONDO
#财报观察员：好市多业绩超预期，美光接棒
@OKX星球 Comprehensive Inventory of Existing Issues in the $CORE CORE Project
1. Trust and Governance Crisis: Foundation Destroyed
· Validator Reward Vulnerability: Currently, about 69 million tokens have flowed into external wallets and cannot be recovered.
· Extremely Opaque Information: The project team has yet to disclose the duration of the vulnerability, the complete flow of the overissued tokens, and the list of involved nodes.
· "Fixed Total Supply" Narrative Broken: Equivalent to advancing rewards for decades into the future and selling them off on the secondary market.
2. Market and Liquidity Crisis: Liquidity Exhausted
· Price Crash and Volume Shrinkage: CORE price has plummeted about 99% from its historical high, and daily trading volume has drastically shrunk.
· Typical "Liquidity Trap": Many holders, but external incremental funds are unwilling to enter. Small rebounds trigger sell-offs to break even, while declines lack buy-side support.
· Collective delisting by exchanges, etc.
3. Ecosystem and Economic Model Crisis: Lack of Self-Sustaining Ability
· Ecosystem Revenue Negligible: Products planned in the roadmap like LST, SatPay, currently generate very low fees within the ecosystem.
· Sustained by Inflation Subsidies: Past support for the market was not from real business profits but from staking incentives; once staking confidence wavers, long-term inflationary selling pressure ensues.
4. Legal and Compliance Risks: Unresolved
Bitcoin cross-chain bridge remains closed
Class action lawsuits looming
Legal firewall: Project registered in the Cayman Islands, team anonymous, early airdrops excluded US users, increasing difficulty of accountability.$BTC surged then pulled back, is the altcoin season really here? Blind FOMO can easily make you the scapegoat holding the bag at the top.
📊 【The Three Iron Rules of Genuine Rotation】
True rotation requires seeing three changes happen simultaneously:
🟢 Altcoins show relative resilience when BTC pulls back
🟢 Trading volume spreads continuously from top assets
🟢 Stablecoin funds also start to grow
Missing any one of these might just mean short-term funds are exploiting the situation. Especially near quarterly options expiry, BTC being suppressed by position structure and sudden spikes in some altcoins do not prove that risk appetite has fully opened.
⚠️ 【Does a Decline in BTC Dominance Equal Funds Flowing into Altcoins?】
A decline in BTC dominance does not necessarily mean funds are flowing from BTC into altcoins.
BTC price stalling and a few tokens surging can also cause dominance to drop. The numbers are the same, but the underlying money is completely different. Don’t be fooled by superficial indicator changes.
(Source: OKX Planet 09/25 )
#BTC冲高回落，市场轮动开始了吗？ #美伊恢复接触，风险溢价会降吗？ #财报观察员：好市多业绩超预期，美光接棒 Day 26, single-day profit ¥18,005.37, and the account finally turned positive from negative. Three consecutive days of profit, finally recovering from the continuous drawdowns of the previous days.
The market on September 23 was very fierce, with BTC and ETH quickly dropping, and altcoins also falling sharply. U.S. Treasury yields rose, and expectations of rate hikes intensified, putting clear pressure on market sentiment.
This time, I didn’t chase the highs or panic sell the lows. After a loss the day before, I directly closed long positions and reduced leverage, only lightly going long when BTC returned near 83,500, and decisively exited after encountering resistance at 84,500.
The biggest gain of the day wasn’t how much I earned, but finally learning to trade less and stick to discipline.
In trading, the key is not always guessing the direction right, but controlling risk and first keeping yourself alive. $BTC $ETH 300 million.
In seven days, USDC increased by this much. Issued 10.1 billion, redeemed 9.8 billion, shuffled back and forth for a while, net increase of 300 million.
Honestly, I felt a bit sleepy after reading this.
In the past, stablecoin issuance was fierce, tens of billions poured in at a time. Now, this number wouldn't even be worth announcing two years ago. A total market cap of 74.6 billion, growing 300 million in a week, not even a fraction.
But you have to say, the reserves are honest. 74.8 billion in reserves against 74.6 billion in circulation, overnight reverse repos of 41.2 billion, short-term debt of 26.5 billion, all immediately liquid assets. Circle is much more reliable than some "reserves".
It's just that nowadays, being reliable isn't valuable.
If the money doesn't come in, no matter how clean it is, it's just a number. I guess it will continue like this, slowly grinding, don't expect stablecoins to give you signals first.
#稳定币新规推进，支付结算加速落地
#美债长端利率持续攀升，融资压力升温 #美股探索代币化与全天候交易 $USDC In the early hours of September 25 Beijing time, Bitget experienced an unauthorized hot wallet transfer attack. The platform's security system detected abnormal fund outflows at 02:31. Internal official calculations estimate the loss at approximately 351.6 million USD, while on-chain monitoring agencies only accounted for assets transferred from publicly tagged addresses, with amounts ranging between 178 million and 190 million USD. The discrepancy between these two figures arises from the platform's wallet hierarchy and incomplete on-chain label coverage, not from contradictory data. The hacker's operational strategy was highly purposeful: prioritizing the exchange of stablecoins that could be frozen by issuers into ETH. On the Arbitrum chain, the attacker quickly completed large token swaps via DEX aggregators, even accepting costs 5% above market price. The core logic was to evade stablecoin freeze interceptions and increase the difficulty of tracking assets after transfer. Subsequently, multi-chain and multi-token assets were consolidated into a single hacker-controlled address, then split and transferred across cross-chain bridges, completing the asset laundering within 2 hours. Regarding incident response, Bitget chose to suspend withdrawals only, keeping deposits and trading fully operational to minimize market panic and bank runs. The platform pledged to fully cover losses using a 464 million USD user protection fund, confirmed that cold wallet assets remain intact, user account balances were not tampered with, and plans to release a complete root cause report at 05:30 on September 26. During this period, progress updates will be synchronized hourly, coordinating with on-chain security service providers and law enforcement agencies to track funds. This incident and the 2025 By₿ $BTC pushed to $84.5K, while on-chain data suggests whales realized over $470M in a day.
Despite heavy profit-taking, there’s no clear sign of a major dump. It could simply be capital rotating while strong demand absorbs the selling.
Shorting aggressively here carries significant squeeze risk if the rally continues. Stay cautious and manage risk. $BTC
#BTCPullbackAltRotation $BTC has risen so much, yet Coinbase's premium index has been negative for 20 consecutive days, indicating that large-scale buyers in the US haven't entered the market yet?
Not just the past 20 days, but most of this year has been negative. This means the rally above 80,000 is absent of US spot funds and is driven by offshore and derivatives.
The good news is leverage is being cleared: open interest dropped 10% yesterday, and 90% of liquidations were longs — it's the leveraged traders being cleaned out, not spot holders running away, so this kind of decline is actually healthy.
USDC issuance increased by 786 million in one day, with a net increase of 1.95 billion over the week; stablecoin liquidity is still flowing into the pool. The Fear & Greed Index is 71, in the greed zone, sentiment is still alive.
Today is futures expiration day, so let's wait and see. The upward trend is still intact. For those without positions, it's recommended to build up to 30% exposure. I see this upward trend reaching 90,000.After pondering trading for a long time, I discovered several contradictory truths. Only if you can truly understand them can you be considered insightful.
Why do many people online not favor day trading? It's not that you can't make money from day trading. The main issue is that it's too exhausting; you need to stay focused on the market constantly, the psychological pressure is maxed out, and the physical and mental toll is too great. The vast majority of people can't withstand this intensity.
From observation, most people's first large profit, with positions growing bigger and bigger, almost always comes from short-term trading. But once their capital scale grows, the philosophy they promote externally shifts to advocating long-term value.
There is also a harsh reality: it's almost impossible to find someone who treats trading as their sole livelihood and walks all the way to financial freedom. Many traders' initial capital to enter the market was actually not earned from the market itself.In AI cloud capital expenditures, memory's share is projected to reach 48% in 2026E and directly jump to 53% in 2027E.
Morgan Stanley's chart marks Memory as the largest single item, while GPU/ASIC only accounts for 18%.
Costco just reported, and the hot topic in the community has shifted to "Micron taking over," which is not just hype.
Simply put: everyone has been focusing on GPUs for too long, but the real biggest cost and bottleneck is actually the memory supply chain.
Micron is still increasing capital expenditures this fiscal year to expand production, indicating that supply won't catch up anytime soon.
I think: the elasticity related to Micron hasn't been fully discussed yet, but it's not about blindly chasing highs.
I'm somewhat bullish on the $MU chain, with very strict failure conditions—if cloud providers cut capital expenditures or memory prices reverse, this story immediately loses value.
Do you believe more in "memory as the main theme in the second half of AI," or do you think the valuation is already overextended?
$MU $NVDA $IBIT
#EarningsObserver: Costco's performance exceeds expectations, Micron takes over
#USLongTermBondYieldsKeepRising, financing pressure heats upAfter my last long position was precisely stopped out, I finally realized! This kind of shitcoin should be shorted! If you dare, keep pushing the shorts to explode! 😤
---
【Finally realized, this coin's tricks are too deep】
My last long was at 0.00196, happily thinking it would rebound after dropping 70%, but as soon as I entered, the manipulative whale pierced my stop loss, and I lost -29% directly.
What’s most frustrating is that after stopping me out, it actually pumped all the way to 0.0024! Watching that big bullish candle, I really wanted to smash my phone. I thought the "sell then rise" script was about to repeat.
But after calming down today, I see the volume behind this pump didn’t keep up; it was purely a "bull trap" after exhausting the longs. Now the price is stagnating and falling back; 0.0024 is its fatal weakness.
The coin’s trick is to first exhaust the longs, then the shorts. That pump last night probably fooled many chasing retail buyers. This current level is a perfect spot to harvest those chasing longs.
In the big downtrend from 0.006, all rebounds are just setups for further drops. The fundamentals of this coin haven’t changed; the one-way downtrend isn’t over yet.
【Trading plan】
· Stop loss: 0.0026 (exit if it breaks previous high)
· Target: 0.0018 → 0.0015
Since longs got cut, I’ll follow the trend and short. Manipulative whale, if you dare keep pumping, let’s see if you have more money or if I can run faster.
$ONE $BTC $ETH
#财报观察员：好市多业绩超预期，美光接棒 #美债长端利率持续攀升，融资压力升温 #美联储重启加息，BTC为何仍有韧性？ The Federal Reserve resumed rate hikes in September, and the market's expectation for further hikes in October once reached 70%, with officials taking a hawkish stance. However, BTC did not weaken; after surging to $87,000, it pulled back. The US spot BTC ETF saw a single-day net inflow of $999 million, hitting a new high for 2026, and enterprises continue to increase their holdings.
#
Historically, BTC and US Treasury real yields have been negatively correlated, with rate hikes typically suppressing the coin's price. Now, this correlation has temporarily weakened: ETFs and enterprises represent long-term allocation funds, whose buying logic focuses on hedging debt and currency depreciation, making them less sensitive to short-term interest rates.
$BTC
But BTC has not completely detached from interest rate impacts. If rate hikes resume and yields continue to rise, the current strong institutional inflows will be hard to sustain, short-term speculative funds will flow out, and ETF inflows may shrink. Although long-term buying will remain, the coin's price will still maintain high volatility, making a one-sided market unlikely.After BTC surges to 87K, don't rush to call a takeoff; the real test might be at the 90K threshold
This BTC rebound has clearly shifted market sentiment. From cautious observation a while ago to the current battle around $87,000, market discussions have changed from "can it still rise" to "where to look after 90K."
This is a typical bull market: price builds confidence, social media fuels imagination.
From the capital perspective, ETFs have recently become a key driving force again. On September 21, the US spot BTC ETF saw nearly $1 billion in single-day net inflows, marking a very notable level this year; meanwhile, short liquidations also helped prices quickly break through key areas.
However, the closer to a round number, the more you can't just rely on sentiment.
87K has already completed an important breakthrough, so the next thing to watch is whether the price can form stable support in the 85K–87K range. If it continuously holds after the breakout, market expectations for 90K will naturally heat up further; if it quickly falls back to the pre-breakout range, it indicates significant short-term profit-taking pressure still exists in this rally.
And 90K itself is not just an ordinary number. Round numbers often gather take-profit orders, hedging positions, and short-term trading funds, so even if the price truly reaches near 90K, sharp volatility is entirely possible. If 90K is ultimately broken effectively, the market's next focus area may shift further up to around 95K or even 97K, with some current market analyses viewing 95K–97K as a significant resistance zone.9-25, Bitcoin consolidates at a high level, focus on capital rotation
Yesterday, Bitcoin retraced to the 1H FVG, 0.5 (82880), forming a support resonance with the previous 4H high. This also caused multiple market assets to form a relative low resonance signal, after which Bitcoin quickly rebounded to around 85,000.
From the current market perspective, if Bitcoin attempts to break the high again this week, it must surpass the higher timeframe high resistance; otherwise, it will likely form a short-term peak, so short-term there is still a need to be cautious about chasing highs.
It should be noted that the market has not yet entered a deep correction phase and is still in a high-level consolidation stage, so it cannot yet be said that the left-side uptrend has ended. For Bitcoin, pay close attention to the lower edge of the 1H FVG at 82,000; if it fails to hold support, it will open up space for correction.
Ethereum: watch the upside at 2700, downside at 2570.
Precious metals, commodities
Regarding CL, a reminder was also given on the 23rd to focus on confirming the 1H low; if confirmed, be cautious of a bullish rebound. Upside 96-98, downside 90-89.
TradFi direction
AMD, Intel, MATE remain strong bulls leading the market, far ahead, but stocks in the storage and cloud service sectors are currently in a pullback correction; watch for low point confirmation signals to seek buying opportunities. Previously held low-position spot assets should not be fully sold; this was already reminded on the 23rd.September 25 Midday Analysis:
ETH formed a small-scale bottom divergence rebound after dipping to a low of 2626 yesterday, but the 4H chart has only barely recovered around 2675. The 2690–2705 range has never formed an effective breakout, while the 4H MACD death cross continues downward and the bearish bars have not significantly contracted, indicating this rebound is more of a weak correction. In the short term, if 2675 continues to fail as support, the first retests will be 2641 → 2626 → 2608.
On the upside, focus on 2690–2705 → 2725. Only by firmly holding above 2705 can we say the short-term rebound quality has improved; further reclaiming 2725 is needed to reverse the current 4H weak structure and qualify for another challenge of 2760–2806. Conversely, if 2690–2725 continues to show stagnation, it should still be treated as a high-level weak consolidation.
2608 remains the core structural support after this rally. If the price only briefly dips below 2608 but quickly recovers, it can still be seen as a deep shakeout after the main rise; however, if the 4H candle closes with volume decisively below 2608 and the rebound fails to reclaim 2640, the HH/HL uptrend structure will be clearly broken. At that point, it can no longer be simply defined as deleveraging but requires caution for a genuine large-scale Wave 1 correction.
Summary:
Currently, the high-level consolidation is weak; 2675 is the short-term support, and 2705–2725 determines whether the rebound can strengthen; below, 2641–2608 is the core support zone. Holding 2608 means the major trend is still an adjustment after the main rise; a decisive 4H break below 2608 without a rebound recovery officially raises the probability of a large-scale correction, with subsequent levels to watch stepwise at 2535–2500, 2450–2380, and finally 2320–2160. $ETH $BTC I’ve lost heavily on $SOL, $IP, $CORE, and $CFX chasing one thing: breaking even. But the losses only grew.
I finally realized I wasn’t trading—I was gambling with my life.
No more leverage, no chasing losses. I’m stepping back, finding stable work, and rebuilding slowly.
Protect your capital. Life comes first. $BTC $SOL
#FedHikesBTCResilience
#USTreasuryYieldsRise