Orbit Post Sitemap
200 million in 12 hours, 7.3 billion out in 30 days
The capital flow of $BTC shows opposite trends in the short term and long term.
Where does this money come from:
A net inflow of $209 million in 12 hours indicates short-term buyers are stepping in.
But a net outflow of 7.37 billion over 30 days means large funds are still moving out.
How is this calculated:
The two figures are not contradictory; they represent two different groups.
Short-term money comes in and goes out quickly, unable to sustain a trend.
Long-term holders should really watch for the 30-day line to turn positive.
Until that day comes, any rebound is just a rebound.
The bottom of $BTC is something to be waited for.
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出
#美CFTC推进加密市场规则，SEC拟调整托管框架 #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 $BTC $NEAR currently lacks directional views; what is missing are verifiable conditions.
Scenario one: breaking through 4.98 and holding indicates the continuation of a bullish structure. Scenario two: falling below 4.495 invalidates the short-term logic.
Current price is 4.912, about 8.49% above the 1-hour support at 4.495, and about 1.38% below the resistance at 4.98. The 1-hour and 4-hour trends are bullish, with RSI values of 60 and 38 respectively. Volume is 0.60 times; for now, it only provides clues and does not conclude price direction.
With these two scenarios laid out, do you think the upper confirmation or the lower invalidation will trigger first?
The above is a market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is from Crypto Bull.Ethereum liquidations hit $356 million, this round's worst is not Bitcoin
In the past day, Ethereum liquidations reached $356 million, surpassing Bitcoin's $298 million. The total market liquidations are nearly $1.19 billion, with long positions accounting for over $1 billion, leverage long positions killing each other.
Leverage is piled too high; once the price drops, it triggers forced liquidations, and the forced selling further pushes the price down, causing a chain reaction of liquidations that won't stop. The harshest single liquidation was nearly $20 million worth of Ethereum positions liquidated at once.
Combined with macro and geopolitical pressures, Ethereum once dropped to around 2410. Being right on direction doesn't necessarily mean profit; with high leverage, you might not even get to see a rebound. $ETH $BTC#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息
The minutes are overall still hawkish: most officials believe another rate hike within the year is still possible, but there is no consensus on the exact timing. The market's bet on an immediate rate hike in October has clearly cooled down.
BTC is currently around 82.5K.
In the short term, I first look at 82K:
If it holds, the rebound target is 84K—85K;
If it breaks, the next level to watch is 80K—81K.
Macro pressure remains now; if I want to go long, I will wait for BTC to reclaim 84K first. When evaluating public chain projects, you can't just look at what the whitepaper says.
Take ACO as an example. The whitepaper's planned direction includes not only the underlying public chain but also modules like DEX, DApp, social content, cross-chain, and community governance.
For these modules to form a complete ecosystem, it involves not only technical development but also product experience, user adoption, and synergy among applications.
Therefore, when researching such projects, you can separate a few questions:
1. How is the development progress of the underlying infrastructure?
2. Are the planned applications actually implemented?
3. Are there real users and genuine usage demands?
4. Is the subsequent roadmap advancing according to the public plan?
The whitepaper can help us understand the project's design concept, but ultimately it needs to be verified by actual progress.
The above content is for project research communication only and does not constitute investment advice. 🔥 With just one sentence from Musk, the market value of the three major carriers took a "plunge"
📉 AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile collectively dropped more than 7%.
The market panic is not because there is another competitor, but because the rules of the game might be rewritten.
🤔 Why the fear?
The core assets of traditional carriers are towers, base stations, fiber optics, and spectrum. They build walls with heavy assets and collect rent based on coverage. But if Starlink turns satellites into "base stations in the sky," phones can connect directly to the stars, enabling calls and internet access in remote areas, at sea, and in deserts. The carriers' walls might be bypassed.
🚀 Musk's plan
No need to lay fiber or build towers; use satellites to form a global mobile network. Users don't have to change phones or search for signals. For carriers, this is a risk of being downgraded from "pipeline providers" to "optional services."
🌍 But it's not that simple
Where does the spectrum come from? Is the capacity sufficient? How to handle high density in cities? Will regulators approve? Terminal power consumption, latency, and pricing are all hurdles. Satellites cannot replace ground networks overnight.
💥 The real impact
The capital market dropped first because the valuation logic changed: carriers are no longer just stable cash flow providers but could be disrupted by technological routes. Musk hasn't officially made a move yet, but panic has already arrived.📡#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 $BTC should hold the 80,000 level; I feel the worst time is almost over.
1. The day before yesterday, the US transferred 17,000 $BTC into exchanges, and everyone suspected it was going to dump, as this represents selling pressure worth $1.5 billion. So that day, over 600 million in funds were scared off within an hour.
But now the panic has been digested. Whether it was selling or portfolio adjustment, it no longer greatly affects retail sentiment, especially since BTC's daily trading volume is 25 billion.
2. Previously, concerns about the US targeting Iran before the midterm elections were also dispelled by Trump's statements. Yesterday I also said: there is no benefit in targeting Iran before the midterms.
Because for this midterm election, Trump's goal is to rally votes for his faction. If he targets Iran, oil prices would rise further in the short term, which is unfavorable for votes.
But the midterm election ends soon, and the long-term effects on the US dollar's hegemony won't manifest in time, so Trump has no incentive to act.
3. Looking at ETF and on-chain dynamics these past two days, we can see many profit-taking positions. The exit of these less committed profit-takers is actually beneficial for the next market phase.
Two negative factors have passed, and the exit of profit-taking positions has also made the chip structure healthier. I remain quite optimistic about the market outlook.TSMC's revenue hits a new high, but the market's real concern is whether the growth can be sustained.
AI demand is driving expansion in advanced processes and advanced packaging, but revenue growth does not necessarily mean profit margins improve simultaneously.
The October 15 earnings report will focus on three key indicators: demand for advanced processes, gross margin guidance, and future capital expenditures.
If AI orders are strong, and both profit margins and guidance exceed expectations, it indicates that the industry chain growth still has fundamental support.
Conversely, if revenue hits a new high but capital expenditures increase significantly and profit margins are under pressure, the market should be cautious about prematurely overestimating growth expectations.
#台积电Q3营收创新高，10月15日财报还有哪些看点？ #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 $BTC $ETH $ZEC Fast, sometimes not fast enough
$BTC Don't judge it by comparing the speed of public blockchains.
The supply cap is 21 million coins, this rule is clear, but the rule itself doesn't create new buyers every day.
I think the real competition it faces is why capital would choose it over deposits, bonds, or other assets.
The more attractive the interest yield, the more reasons are needed to hold a non-interest-bearing asset. Scarcity provides the foundation, demand determines how much the market is willing to pay, and these two things should not be mixed.
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出
$ETH Scaling solves congestion but also brings a new challenge.
Rollups bundle transactions and submit them to Ethereum, allowing more operations to be done on layer two.
But users benefiting from lower costs and the base layer earning more do not happen simultaneously.
My view is that scaling first expands the market, then strives to earn revenue from the larger market. Judging failure only by fee reduction is too early, and judging ETH's benefit only by layer two prosperity omits a key step.
$SOL Low fees can attract users, but cheapness is also easily imitated by competitors.
Its base fee is 5000 lamports per signature, plus a priority fee.
So I care more about the cost for users to leave: assets, transaction depth, commonly used applications—whether they make people too lazy to switch places.
If another chain is just a bit cheaper, users will all move away, making growth fragile. Retaining people makes it easier to turn temporary hype into a long-term business.💥 1-Hour Liquidation Storm: Approximately $489 million to $600 million liquidated across the entire market, marking the highest single-hour total in nearly a month. Leveraged long positions were the hardest hit, accounting for about 95%. $BTC liquidations during the same period were approximately $43.5 million to $76.74 million.
📉 Triggers for the Sell-Off:
· Key Level Breach: BTC fell below $81,000, triggering cascades of forced liquidations and stop-loss orders.
· Macro Pressure: The September FOMC minutes were hawkish, with potential rate hikes still possible this year; U.S. Treasury yields remain elevated, putting pressure on risk assets.
· On-Chain Disturbance: Approximately $1.01 billion in BTC was moved from wallets linked to the U.S. government, intensifying concerns over selling pressure.
🧨 Crowded longs combined with negative factors caused a liquidation cascade. Short-term focus is on whether $81,000 can be reclaimed and if macro sentiment can ease.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 I observe that BTC is undergoing high-level oscillation and correction on the 4-hour chart. After previously surging to 87374, it has pulled back, with the current price at 82531 below the Bollinger middle band (82929), indicating a weak trend. Although the MACD fast and slow lines are below the zero axis, the red energy bar (120.4) shows weakening bearish momentum, suggesting a potential golden cross forming. There is buying support near 81000 (Bollinger lower band). My strategy is to closely watch if the price can retake the middle band; if it breaks out with volume, I will go long accordingly; if it falls below the 80,000 mark, I will strictly stop loss. Currently, volume has clearly shrunk, so I am maintaining a light position and waiting for a clear direction.Look at the chart, 15-minute timeframe.
The "central oscillation" we simulated last night is unfolding. The price fell back from 83,014, hitting a low of 82,277.2, then rebounded to 82,592. From the current structure:
1. Small timeframe: The 15-minute MACD green bars have drastically shortened, and the fast and slow lines are about to form a golden cross below the zero line. Short-term bearish momentum is fading, showing signs of a bottom fractal. The price is building a new minor central zone.
2. Large timeframe: The downward stroke on the 3-hour chart paused after reaching the major central zone (80,227-80,552). The large timeframe support remains valid, but whether the upward stroke is confirmed still needs observation.
3. Key levels: Resistance above at 83,014, support below at 82,277.
The current structure is in a phase of "large timeframe support, small timeframe oscillation." The direction is unclear; wait for the structure to develop on its own.
Do you understand this double bottom structure? 📉$LAYER $SOL Damn it! This SOL market is really dog-eat-dog, quiet outside, but inside the market is crashing faster than anyone else 😂 The 109.37 level has been sideways for a long time, the manipulators are clearly shaking out the market, and each candlestick looks weaker than the last.
Don't fomo, this wave is purely a hard cash dump, the scythe is already at the neck. The resistance at 110.5 is tight, and if 108.2 breaks, it will accelerate. A rebound to the 109.8-110.2 range is a shorting opportunity, stop loss at 111.5, target first at 106.5.
This wave won't lose, playing with manipulators is all about patience. Those wanting to get in should check the token market card below, don't chase highs, wait for a rebound before acting. What do you think? 🤔
The above is just personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Cryptocurrency is highly volatile, please make decisions cautiously, profits and losses are your own responsibility.
👇👇👇Got a bit timid, brothers, I guessed this $LIT would drop, but didn't expect it to fall this much
I shorted at 3684, it dropped to just above 3520, another big loss this round
Why do I always choose to hold on stubbornly when I guess the wrong direction, but when I'm right, I can't hold and want to run?
But to be fair, you should still avoid these altcoins, just make what you can, the volatility is too high, with sudden sharp drops
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出
$BTC $ETH ETH rose 71% in Q3, but the proportion of profitable supply hasn't entered the "warning zone" yet — this is the most counterintuitive aspect of this wave.
It's not just a simple pump-and-dump: ETF inflows, treasury companies buying up, and staking locking up circulating supply have tightened the float, pushing prices up, yet the on-chain "floating profit positions" haven't piled up to historical peak levels.
The meaning is simple:
• It's not that no one is profiting; it's that the "majority of people who have made huge profits and are ready to sell" stage hasn't arrived yet;
• It's not that there's no risk; the overheating signals lag price movements;
• Chasing highs risks being shaken out, waiting for a pullback risks missing out — this is the most frustrating part right now.
My personal view: this combination looks like the "mid-term market hasn't finished yet," but it's not a signal to blindly rush in. The truly dangerous moment is usually when "any buy makes a profit and profitable supply soars to extremes," and that moment hasn't come yet.
Next, I'll focus on two things:
1) Whether the proportion of profitable supply has surged into the historical warning zone;
2) Whether ETF/on-chain outflows have started to reverse.
Not entering the warning zone ≠ it will keep rising, ≠ you can go all in.
It just means: this round of ETH hasn't gone crazy yet. btc just barely stood above 82500 after closing at 8 AM this morning.
There are a few conclusions to discuss, also preparing us for how to view the market next.
First, standing above 82500, the overall structure is barely holding, and the daily level bullish outlook remains unchanged.
Second, btc being able to stand above 82500 indicates a good consensus sentiment for chasing rebounds in the market. Everyone is willing to pay 10% more to buy, rather than worry about missing the entire bull market by paying 10% more.
Third, I don't really believe btc will undergo a further large-scale correction in the near future.
My personal practical idea is that if it drops to 79000, that would be the limit for this round. Also, I am a short-term trader, and my judgment criteria are only one: whether the 4-hour level shows a new bullish direction, and whether the 1-hour level shows obvious bullish signs.
Currently, btc on both 4-hour and 1-hour levels does not meet my long position requirements, so I continue to hold my short positions.
When btc meets the requirements, I will change my approach.📌 10/10 币圈晨帖：今天不看“剧本叙事”，看三件正在发生的事 1）中国侧：虚拟货币风险提醒从“金融口”扩到“安全口” 国家安全部发文把虚拟货币和间谍经费、勒索病毒、涉密风险绑在一起讲，深圳华强北/水贝商户收到风险提示书、违规自媒体被处置。 → 境内叙事不再是“能不能炒”，而是“碰了算风险自担”。 2）海外侧：合规产品化继续往前推 - 泰国 SEC：10/16 起加密 ETF 框架生效，先只放 BTC、ETH，不让保证金杠杆。 - 欧盟 ESMA：未过 MiCA 的稳定币/ART/EMT 服务要收口。 - 渣打新加坡：准备做加密资产 + 稳定币 + RWA 托管。→ 大方向不是“去中心化狂欢”，是“托管行 + 交易所 + 监管文件”三层包装。 3）市场微观：Q3 涨完，Q4 进入“成分股分化” Q3 里 UNI +220%、NEAR +200%、LINK +100%、AAVE +87.5%、ETH +70.9%、SOL +60.5%；但这是“基准成分跑赢大盘”，不是垃圾币普涨。 现在节奏变成： - BTC：宏观利率 + 政府链上转移（美国 Bitfinex 案 1.2 万枚 BT$BTC 15-minute chart encountered resistance at 83499 and pulled back, currently at 82532, fluctuating within the range. Upper resistance is between 83400-83500, support near 81500. Market bulls and bears are clearly divided, with 46% bullish and 27% bearish. Rising US Treasury yields continue to suppress the market, and capital inflow is slowing down.
$ETH is following the broader market, with 2576 as the short-term high, resistance at 2520, and support at 2460. Unichain's migration to OP Enterprise is a layer-two positive, but there is no strong short-term rebound in the market; the positive news has not immediately translated into buying pressure.
On the other hand, US stock storage company SanDisk $SNDK had bloated high-level chips previously, with smart money concentrated on clearing positions and exiting, directly closing long positions in Nvidia, SanDisk, and Hynix, giving back 94% of floating profits. The candlestick chart broke downwards, resistance at 1640, support at 1577. The AI hardware sector is under pressure due to concerns over US Treasury yields and financing costs.🔥 Hawkish winds rise again, and the crypto market trembles first. The September FOMC minutes leaned hawkish, with most officials not ruling out further rate hikes within the year, forcing the market to reprice liquidity. U.S. Treasury yields surged, the dollar strengthened, and high-risk crypto assets were the first to be sold off. 📉
Liquidity also loosened: ETFs shifted from net inflows to temporary outflows, shaking institutional long confidence; crowded long contracts triggered cascading liquidations on any drop, with leverage-induced sell-offs amplifying the decline. 🧨
The divergence is very real:
$BTC follows macro trends, falling relatively restrained;
$ETH is still dragged down by DeFi and on-chain fund withdrawals, often falling deeper than BTC but with stronger rebound elasticity;
$ZEC has the greatest sentiment elasticity, with large prior gains and heavy profit-taking pressure, so when risk appetite drops, it is prioritized for realization, leading to sharp drops and volatile rebounds. ⚡
Today's outlook: The overall environment remains weak and volatile, with the cloud of rate hikes unlikely to dissipate soon, making a direct reversal difficult. Most likely, the market will bottom out first, then face pressure after a small rebound; only if the Fed turns dovish or data clearly weakens will sustained recovery be possible. BTC follows the broader market, ETH has high elasticity, and ZEC carries the highest volatility and risk. ⚠️#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 $ZEC Can this pullback revive a second spring?
To conclude, Xiaoyu still sticks to the previous bearish view,
Don’t be fooled by this pullback into selling! The 1248 short position defense line is as solid as Mount Tai, the rebound is just a bull trap!
Yesterday’s sharp pullback to around 100 points scared many brothers into cold sweats, thinking the bears were about to be squeezed?
Don’t panic! Just take a look at the smart money data to know the truth: the main short players’ average cost is firmly stuck at 1248.57! No matter how strong the rebound was just now, it didn’t even touch their cost line. The current short position is 149 million (149.86M), although there are many players (588), they still hold an unrealized profit of 2.78 million, pure profit status unchanged.
But you have to see the essence: the bulls actually hold heavier positions (193 million), with a low cost of 920, making a huge profit of 48.17 million! This move looks more like the bulls using momentum to shake out weak hands, while 1248 suppresses nearly 150 million short position chips. Would the big short players do charity and watch retail investors push the price up to blow their shorts? Absolutely not! 1248 is the short-term iron top, the rebound is purely a bull trap.
In short, the closer the price gets to 1248, the more favorable the risk-reward ratio for shorting. Brothers, keep a close eye, find a position to short near 1248, don’t wait until the main players dump the market and then regret it! (Note: the bulls’ base positions are too thick, beware of another rally after a pullback, risk control first)
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 Is there anyone like me who is clearly bullish on BTC but always gets shaken out before it starts?
$BTC current price 82539, resistance 83000, support 82000. Yesterday it dipped to 81569 then pulled back; this kind of dip without breaking support is often the main force shaking out weak hands.
I used to get killed in these shakeouts: I sold on every drop, and after selling I missed the rebound. I lost 200,000U before realizing that contracts don’t make money by running fast, but by holding on. Now I only buy near support, set stop loss below support, keep position under 5000U, and don’t hold through big swings.
Holding long positions above 81000, 83000 is the first target; no action before breakout, act after breakout.
Controlling your impulses is better than anything. $ #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 307.8 Precise Top Escape, 50x Short Position Dimensionality Reduction Strike
$TAO precisely touched the upper boundary of the descending channel and the dense chip area at 307.8, resonating with pressure. The 1-hour EMA144/169 diverged downward with volume-price divergence. I decisively opened a 50x short position and exited at 302.7, realizing a floating profit of 82.84%! Trading is about position, not emotion.
Combining the current 1-hour chart, after the price bottomed at 254.2 and rebounded for repair, MA5/10/20 converged around 274, MACD showed a weak golden cross below zero (DIFF:0.4, DEA:0.1), bearish momentum exhausted, entering a consolidation phase.
📊 Latest Key Levels:
🔴 Resistance: 277.4 (24h high) → 288-296 (intermediate platform) → 304-309.6 (strong initial drop pressure).
🟢 Support: 269-274 (moving average dense area) → 264 (lower consolidation boundary) → 254.2 (absolute low of this round).
302 has already broken down, focus on 277 resistance. If the rebound cannot hold above 280, bears still dominate!
This roller coaster from 307.8 to 254, did you escape the top to take profit or bottom fish and get buried? At the current 275 level, do you think it will break above 280 to test 300, or is it a "dead cat bounce" continuing down to 254? Leave your divine prediction in the comments!👇$DOGE $OKB #全球长期国债收益率升至多年高位 A breather before the CPI, not a reversal
The FOMC minutes leaned hawkish, and the Strait of Hormuz added fuel to oil prices, which jumped 4% in a single day, bringing imported inflation pressures back into view. However, the market's bet on a rate hike in October has dropped from 70% to 20%, so there is a short-term relief; the real test will be the CPI on October 14.
Looking at the market, BTC dipped to 80400 then pulled back to 82600, the 4-hour MACD green bars are converging, bearish momentum is weakening, and the oversold rebound window is opening. Resistance lies at 83500-84000 from moving averages; only a break above this can talk about recovery. As long as 80400 holds, there is still short-term trading value. ETH is weaker, bottoming at 2406 then rebounding to 2501, with clear resistance at 2579 and 2400 as the last line of defense.
Last night felt more like an emotional sell-off plus leverage liquidation; currently entering a phase of bearish news dulling. Can you buy the dip? You can lightly try to catch a rebound but avoid heavy bets on the bottom. Watch BTC at 80400 and ETH at 2400; if broken, exit. Save your ammunition before the CPI and wait for confirmation before adding. This is not a reversal, just a breather.
Not investment advice.There are no eternal enemies, only eternal interests. Trump announced a diesel supply arrangement with Putin, under which Russia will supply 300,000 tons, 500,000 tons, and 1 million tons of diesel in October, November, and December respectively. The US simultaneously eased related sanctions, allowing Russian diesel imports until April next year, and Russia will also lift diesel export restrictions ahead of schedule.
The consensus reached by both sides is driven by practical needs. The US hopes to increase supply to lower transportation and agricultural costs, easing inflation and election pressures; Russia needs to expand energy exports, increase revenue, and seek room for sanction relief. The US exchanges market access for supply, while Russia trades energy for income and bargaining chips. When the cost of confrontation begins to affect each side's core interests, cooperation finds its foundation.
For the market, if the additional supply can drive energy prices to continue falling, it will help ease inflationary pressures and provide more room for monetary policy, which is a positive signal for the US stock and crypto markets.The September FOMC minutes were hawkish, with most officials feeling another rate hike is needed before year-end. Whether there will be a hike in October is uncertain, but the threat of "higher rates for longer" is already hanging over us. The dollar and U.S. Treasuries surged, and institutional risk aversion sentiment shot up.
$BTC: For a rebound, it depends on whether spot buying can hold; otherwise, a high spike followed by a drop is likely.
$ETH: Its high volatility is a liability during tightening. With funds seeking safety, ETH/BTC continues to weaken. Even if Bitcoin stabilizes, Ethereum will likely continue to underperform.
Until macro pressures ease, don’t rush to catch a falling knife, nor assume the market is over. Focus closely on inflation data, Treasury yields, and whether Bitcoin can lead Ethereum in a synchronized rebound.
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 A 1 billion liquidation storm has just swept through the market, with 91% of long positions blown to pieces.
Retail investors are still rushing in, while smart money is quietly withdrawing.
Is this ETH rebound a real reversal or the last bull trap?
Let's look at the current situation.
US Treasury yields have surged to a 24-year high, with the 10-year breaking 5.35% and the 30-year standing above 5.70%.
Money is getting more expensive, and risk assets will only get harder.
$BTC broke below 81,000 last night, with 1.16 billion liquidated in 24 hours, including 1 billion in long positions.
$ETH didn’t hold up either, dropping below 2,500, with $324 million in positions liquidated, the worst in the entire market.
Looking at the retail long-short ratio, it’s 2.12:1, with everyone still frantically bottom-fishing, thinking the drop is an opportunity.
Think about how many times this scene has appeared?
The more excited retail investors get, the harder the fall afterward.
Whales have already started shorting, while retail is still going long.
My short position at 2,671 with 100x leverage has a floating profit of 701%.
Not running at all! Why?
Because retail longs are too crowded.
The dense resistance zone is between 2,530 and 2,550; a rebound to this area is a shorting point.
Operationally, lightly short near the current price of 2,484, stop loss above 2,530, target first at 2,426, and add positions if broken, aiming for 2,355.
In this market, short positions are the trend.
$SOL
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 $BTC is now at 82539, resistance at 83000, support at 82000, 24-hour high and low points from 83499 to 81569, with a fluctuation close to two thousand points. The direction is slightly bullish but no breakout yet.
Many people ask me if they can chase now; my answer is no. Until 83000 is firmly held, chasing in is just giving the market makers easy profits. My strategy is simple: place long orders near the support on pullbacks, set stop loss below 82000, target 83000, and add more if it breaks.
After losing 200,000 U, I learned one thing: with data in front of you, don't trade based on emotions. Use a small 5000 U position to test, always set stop loss, and only trade what you can afford to lose to survive longer.
Don't hold losing positions, don't go all in, act when the position is right, and wait when it's not. $ #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 The simple altcoin mode only lasted a few days, going long just made profits, opening positions just made profits, but now it's hard to play. Just hold $BTC spot and wait. When it was at 63,000 before, I didn't add positions, fine, but I also had a dual-currency win order hanging for over 200 days, lost badly.$SNDK 75x short! Floating profit 245%!! Sold from 1643 to 1589, enjoyed the downward volatility!
75x, those who understand know, a single altcoin needle pierces through. Now 2.4x big profit, immediately lock in a large portion of gains, set stop loss at 1620 to protect the base position, then watch 1550. $BTC $ETH
No retracement means a win, steady close! No stubbornness at 75x, take the profit and leave the remaining position to fate, a solid morning! #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 ✅ Closed $OP long 20x
Entry: 0.1167 → Exit: 0.1265
Result: +165% ROE
I post every entry and exit, whether profit or loss. Do you currently hold $OP?
Not investment advice. #OKXTraderVoices Is $BTC ETF outflow the end of the bull market? Don't scare yourself.
Checked the market this morning, BTC is still hovering around 82,000.
A bunch of people in the community got scared by the large ETF outflows and are shouting that the bear market is coming.
I really don't get it, it's not that exaggerated.
At the end of the day, institutions are just reducing risk.
The FOMC minutes were hawkish, interest rates remain high, and money earns interest just by sitting still, which is safer.
Plus, BTC failed to break through 87,000 earlier, bulls are exhausted, so they’re taking profits first.
Especially altcoin ETF redemptions are much harsher than BTC’s, the fees are too severe.
Now it’s a battle over existing supply, rebounds are just oversold corrections, don’t mistake it for a reversal.
My judgment is simple.
Keep a close eye on 82,000 support; if it holds, it’s a consolidation and bottoming process, if it breaks, that’s real trouble.
My PUMP longs are still getting hit, I’m neither adding nor cutting, just holding tight.
Not betting on direction, waiting for the market to decide.
Brothers, the week is almost over again. Did you recover this week or are you like me, playing dead? 👇
$BTC $ETH
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 今晨一句话：BTC 报 82,657 美元，24h 微涨约 0.5%，从周四 80,427 美元的低点反弹了约 2,230 美元；ETH 报 2,489 美元，24h 涨约 0.5%。8 万守住了，反弹正在进行中。 爆仓数据有个很有意思的反转。全网 24h 滚动爆仓 10.9 亿美元（CoinGlass），18.1 万人爆仓，其中多单 9.31 亿、占 85%，空单只有 1.62 亿——看 24h 口径，这还是周四那波多头屠杀的余波。但把时间切到过去 12 小时，画风完全反了：空单爆了 4,629 万美元，多单只爆了 1,108 万。跌的时候爆多头，涨的时候爆空头，杠杆两头都在挨打。 资金面在分化。现货 BTC ETF 周三净流出 4.849 亿美元（6 月以来最大单日流出），周四再流出 2.44 亿，两天走了 7.289 亿美元，长线机构的钱还在撤。但期货市场反着来：未平仓合约涨了 4%，达到 44.7 万枚 BTC——价格跌了 5%，杠杆反而在加码。走的是长钱，进的是快钱。 ETH 是这轮最弱的那个。10 月 1 日收 2,706 美元，周四收 2,565 美元，一周跌 5.2%，Future Digital Currency Value Rankings Must Include Post-Quantum Security Dimension: Reasons + Importance of Technical Upgrade Strategies
I. Why Future Currency Value Rankings Must Emphasize Security and Post-Quantum Resistance
1. Quantum Computing Threats Undermine the Fundamental Basis of Asset Ownership
The vast majority of mainstream public chains (BTC, ETH, SOL) rely on elliptic curve ECC cryptography for account signatures. Once fault-tolerant quantum computers arrive, Shor's algorithm can derive private keys from public keys, enabling asset theft.
Hackers can also employ "collect public keys now, decrypt later when quantum machines mature" preemptive hoarding attacks. Public keys recorded permanently on-chain expose today's public keys to theft risk years later, representing a long-term black swan risk hanging over the industry.
Note: Hash functions (block hashes) themselves are quantum-resistant; the risk concentrates on account signature algorithms, not the blocks themselves.
2. AI Accelerates and Amplifies Quantum Cryptography Risks, Creating a Double Threat
AI can assist cryptographic mathematical analysis, speeding up the discovery of elliptic curve weaknesses and shortening the quantum attack development cycle. The combination of AI and quantum computing compresses the window of cryptographic crisis.
However, boundaries must be clear: post-quantum cryptography can only protect against signature algorithm cracking; it cannot defend against AI scanning smart contract vulnerabilities or AI phishing attacks. Contract vulnerabilities, malicious project teams, and cross-chain bridge flaws are currently the most common causes of coin theft and belong to a different security system than quantum cryptography.
3. Network Upgrade and Migration Difficulty Directly Determines Long-Term Survival Ability of a Currency
This is a key factor in ranking evaluation. BTC and ETH have elliptic curve protocols hardcoded at the base layer; switching to post-quantum signatures likely requires a hard fork, all users changing addresses, and asset migration. The community coordination cost is extremely high, easily causing splits and asset loss.
Networks like STRK with native account abstraction architectures have accounts as smart contracts, requiring no hard fork or address changes, enabling smooth upgrades to post-quantum signatures with vastly lower migration costs.
Evaluation criteria no longer focus solely on market cap, ecosystem, and fees but also on whether the network supports agile cryptographic upgrades.
4. Institutional Long-Term Capital Allocation Will Incorporate Post-Quantum Security into Risk Controls
Institutions making 5-10 year asset allocations must assess long-term cryptographic security risks. As RWA and tokenized assets scale on-chain, custodians will prioritize infrastructure that has completed post-quantum upgrades or has mature, smooth upgrade paths. Post-quantum resistance will become a hard security threshold for institutional selection of base layer public chains and L2s.
5. Security Is the Value Baseline, Not an Additional Narrative
Past rankings in crypto only considered market cap, trading volume, and ecosystem popularity. But if the underlying signature algorithm loses security in the future, no matter how large the ecosystem or trading volume, the foundation of asset trust will be shaken. Security is the premise of value; without long-term cryptographic security, long-term valuation is not guaranteed.
II. Importance of Technical Upgrade Strategies
1. Plan Ahead to Avoid Rushed Hard Forks During Crisis
Post-quantum migration is not a temporary project; it requires algorithm selection, contract modification, wallet adaptation, node upgrades, and community governance voting, spanning several years. Waiting until Q-Day approaches leaves insufficient time.
Industry mainstream approach: adopt NIST standard post-quantum signatures (Falcon, ML-DSA, SPHINCS+ hash signatures), use hybrid cryptographic systems, run old and new signature algorithms in parallel, gradually migrate existing accounts to avoid one-time network-wide major changes.
2. Different Chains’ Upgrade Paths Determine Competitive Edge
- Native Post-Quantum Chains (QRL): Use post-quantum signatures from genesis, advantage is base-layer security; drawback is smaller ecosystem and liquidity.
- Account Abstraction Architecture (STRK): Proof layer is naturally post-quantum resistant; accounts can individually switch to post-quantum signatures, enabling smooth, seamless upgrades—ideal for large ecosystems.
- BTC/ETH: Require lengthy community negotiations, soft/hard forks to add post-quantum addresses; assets with exposed public keys remain at risk; migration is very difficult.
3. Upgrades Must Not Only Change Cryptography; Supporting Security Systems Must Be Improved Simultaneously
Post-quantum cryptography addresses long-term private key cracking risks; simultaneously, continuous contract audits, multisig governance, bug bounty programs, and key rotation are needed to defend against AI-exploited contract vulnerabilities and hacker attacks. Post-quantum resistance is one part of the security system and cannot alone guarantee absolute security.
III. Constructing New Future Currency Value Evaluation Weights (New Ranking Approach)
1. Fundamentals (Ecosystem, Cash Flow, Decentralization, Liquidity): Primary Weight
2. Network Security Reserves (Contract Audits, Multisig, Governance Transparency): Secondary Weight
3. Cryptographic Security and Post-Quantum Upgrade Capability (Post-Quantum Resistance, Cryptographic Agility, Migration Plans): Tertiary Weight (weight to increase over time)
4. Sector, Valuation, Market Cycle: Quaternary Weight
Summary in One Sentence:
Short-term rankings focus on trading volume, ecosystem, and capital heat; mid-to-long-term value rankings must include post-quantum security and network upgrade capability. The long-term cryptographic security of the system determines whether a project can survive the quantum + AI technology transformation cycle and is the fundamental moat of long-term value. However, post-quantum capability is a value-added security indicator and cannot be the sole stock-picking criterion detached from fundamentals. 🔥 On October 10, $ETH: After losing 2500, it is gasping around 2470
OKX currently reports $2,480–2,490, opened at 2476 → now 2489, slightly up +0.5%~+2%. But don’t be fooled by this bullish candle
Why so weak? Three reasons
ETF continuous net outflow (about 118 million this week, BlackRock ETHA withdrew 116 million in one day), institutions are moving from ETH back to BTC for hedging
September FOMC minutes were hawkish, 10-year US Treasury yield at 5.33%, ETH staking yield only 2.63%—a yield gap of 2.7 points, why would big money hold on?
Long contracts are being liquidated: a certain whale’s 250 million long position liquidation price is about 2445, breaking below triggers a chain reaction
Technical aspect: RSI has dropped to 24.8, deeply oversold; price broke below the 20-day EMA (2,650), currently clinging to the 50-day EMA (2,492) for support.
In short: RSI at 24.8 gives a reason for a technical rebound, but without ETF inflows, all rebounds are just pullbacks. ETH is currently the weakest among the majors—if you want to bet on a rebound, only very small positions with stop loss below 2,445; only holding above 2,511 counts as a bottom, the real direction awaits the October 14 CPI.
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #跟着OKX打卡2049 $BTC $ZEC During Bitcoin's drop from $87,000, long-term holders have hardly deposited coins to exchanges
On-chain data shows that during the correction from the $87,000 peak, the amount of coins deposited by long-term holders to exchanges was extremely low.
Coins must first be transferred to exchanges to trigger selling. Old coins are almost never moved to platforms, indicating that this round of decline is not due to large-scale selling by long-term whales; selling pressure mainly comes from short-term traders.
My view: This is a very important positive on-chain signal. The biggest fear in a bull market phase is when long-term holders collectively transfer coins to dump, which often signals a trend top. This time, long-term holders chose to lock their coins in place during the pullback, indicating that large funds do not see the current decline as an exit opportunity, and the market's underlying coin structure remains intact.
But it should be viewed rationally: long-term holders not selling ≠ immediate bottoming or rebound. Short-term bearish factors still exist, with ETF outflows and rising US Treasury yields continuing to suppress the market. Currently, it is a short-term capital game, with old coins lying flat and watching.
Trading approach: Do not heavily go long based solely on this one on-chain data point. Strictly control leverage in contracts and focus on key support levels. As long as long-term holders continue to maintain low deposit levels, the probability of a deep drop decreases; once a large amount of old coins are transferred to exchanges later, immediate caution is required.Celsius founder banned for life from the crypto space and must pay an additional $35 million
Brothers, Alex Mashinsky, the founder of Celsius, is completely done for.
The New York Attorney General announced a settlement yesterday: Mashinsky is banned for life from securities, futures, and the crypto space, and must pay up to $35 million — $25 million depends on whether he pays the $10 million federal fines and forfeitures, and the remaining $10 million depends on whether he serves a full 12-year prison sentence honestly.
He is currently serving 12 years in federal prison, having pleaded guilty to securities fraud. Back then, he packaged Celsius as "safer than banks," tricking hundreds of thousands of people into depositing funds, but he used customers' money to gamble on high-risk strategies and hid the losses. In June 2022, Celsius froze withdrawals and declared bankruptcy a month later, causing many people's money to vanish — fortunately, bankruptcy liquidation has returned $3.4 billion so far.
Interestingly, this is already his third "lifetime ban" this year: FTC in April, CFTC in June, and now New York State. Three strikes, you're out, it's definite.
When Celsius collapsed back then, was your money in it? Let's discuss in the comments.
Risk warning: The market is highly volatile, please control your position size. For reference only, not investment advice.
#Bitcoin #Ethereum #Celsius ✏️ $BTC
After reaching the key support at $81,000, we now got a local bounce with price returning around $82,500
For now I'd best wait for today's daily candle close, see how it turns out and after that I'll put together a new market setup, since locally they could manipulate in both directions right now to collect certain liquidity clusters, so it's best to wait a bit now and not rush into new positions220 million long positions vanished into thin air, who did BTC's late-night "fake rebound" harvest?
In the past 12 hours, the BTC market has been a bloodbath. Long positions across the network liquidated $220 million, while short positions only $27.486 million, a huge disparity. Bears barely got hurt, but bulls were collectively liquidated.
Last night's market was irrational. A sharp dump pushed the low to 80351. The downtrend paused this morning, rebounding to 81769.6, seemingly stabilizing. But after I bought in at 82000, BTC briefly surged to 82600, and at that moment I really thought I bottomed out successfully. What happened next? The market reversed and continued to drop, breaking below 80400 with new lows. A large number of long positions were swept, many directly liquidated.
This round of bull liquidation was much harsher than a normal correction. Why is BTC falling while ETFs are still seeing inflows? Because spot inflows are slow money, while futures leverage is fast money. The FOMC minutes show most officials favor another rate hike; under macro pressure, risky assets first kill high leverage. Few short liquidations indicate bears control the pace, bulls became prey.
The crypto market shakeout is this brutal: it looks like a rebound, then suddenly continues to crash. What you think is the bottom might just be the starting point for the next round of liquidations.
Don't mistake a rebound for a reversal, don't bet your position on narratives. Surviving is more important than bottom fishing.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 Don't let old impressions dictate today's orders
$JUP showed strength yesterday but dropped about 8.7% today. However, looking at a longer timeframe, it still rose 5.3% over the week and nearly 39% over the month. So, I'm not in a rush to overturn the "relative strength" judgment, but I also won't use yesterday's strength as a reason to buy today. The only thing to watch next is whether the pullback can be stopped. If the rebound is short-lived and the decline expands, expectations should be lowered. Judgments can change; there's no need to stick to being right and watch the price fall all the way down.
$WLD dropped nearly 19% over the week. At this point, it's better to let go of its previous rapid rise. "It rose fast before" doesn't answer what will drive the next rally. I'll watch more and act less, waiting for buying pressure to stabilize the price before discussing recovery potential. Past speed is not a guarantee of future returns.
$ZEC fell nearly 10% in 24 hours and about 6.4% over the month. Looking longer term, it hasn't escaped this round of weakness either. The most misleading thing right now is repeatedly using old highs as a benchmark. Being far from the high only shows it has fallen, not that it should rise back. I prefer to observe whether the lows can gradually rise, letting the price give its own answer.
In the market, memory is often more stubborn than candlesticks. But trading is not about saving face; it's about following changes. Yesterday's strength only explains yesterday; today's weakness doesn't mean permanent weakness. Let go of old impressions and accept new signals to make the next clear decision.
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息
#Winklevoss旗下机构申请ZEC现货ETF $ETH Today's market: pulled back from a low of 2432 to above 2500, up 2.6% intraday. But in the past 24 hours, the market just went through a meat grinder typhoon: $1.193 billion liquidated across the network, 190,000 people liquidated. Long positions liquidated $1.055 billion, shorts only $138 million — the rain fell entirely on the bulls' field. The biggest strike was on ETH: $19.98 million.
A certain whale had 28,716 ETH long positions wiped out, losing $69.69 million. He didn't retreat, instead doubled down to 78,955 ETH, worth $196 million, with liquidation prices at 2299/2286, less than $200 away from the current price. No umbrella left, still standing in the storm.
ETF net outflows for 8 consecutive days, BlackRock withdrew $71.12 million yesterday, totaling over $640 million. Institutions are closing umbrellas, whales are getting drenched, retail investors are becoming floodwater. STRK
Current price 0.07423, slightly pulled back and consolidated after a surge.
Resistance level: 0.07732, support below at 0.07359
Strong support at 0.06143
News: Starknet plans to complete L1 transformation by 2027
to achieve quantum resistance.
The recent rally has been very strong
Currently in a pullback phase after the rise
Only by holding above 0.07732 is there a chance to continue surging
Be cautious of deeper correction if it breaks below 0.07359
$ZEC $ETH $SOL
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出
#跟着OKX打卡2049 $BTC dropped all the way from around 87,000 to just above 80,000. This round of correction has thoroughly taught those who chased the highs a lesson.
Looking at the market now, I'm actually not in a hurry to bottom-fish. The order at 80,200 was just a bit short of being filled, and later the lowest hit 80,351. It's a bit of a pity, but if you missed it, you missed it—there's no need to chase just because of this small regret.
Looking at the current market, BTC is tugging back and forth around 82,500, and the rebound hasn't yet reversed the previous downtrend. $ETH is moving sideways for now, SOL is weak, $ZEC is also retreating, but $MAGIC suddenly surged over 35%, indicating that not all coins are falling together; some localized funds are still looking for opportunities.
The most common mistake in this kind of market is seeing BTC rebound a few hundred points and thinking the bottom has been reached; or seeing a certain altcoin suddenly surge and being unable to resist chasing it.
My approach is simple: first see if BTC can hold steady around 80,000, then see if the rebound can retake key levels. If it holds, there's a chance for further recovery; if the rebound is weak and the lows are broken again, don't rush to declare the market bottomed.
After trading for a while, I realized that making a little less profit is really nothing; the worst is giving up control because you can't bear to miss out.
Brothers, do you think this BTC move is a normal correction after a sharp drop, or a mid-term rebound within a downtrend? The rebound came right after the dip: PIXEL leads with +4.7%, is this a last gasp or a second wave?
The previous message just mentioned the mini market closing, and twenty minutes later the rebound arrived, led again by the familiar face PIXEL, currently priced at 0.00743, up 4.66%, already touching the Bollinger upper band at 0.00758 and near the 24-hour high of 0.00762. Don’t rush to call it a second wave yet; there are a few details I’m skeptical about.
First, this round only PIXEL is charging ahead alone, while the previous leader MAGIC has dropped off the list. In a catch-up rally, usually the second leader bounces first while the leader lags behind, which often means funds that haven’t fully exited are trying to save themselves; second, the second tier generally only shows around 2% gains, and BTC is still stuck at 82,500, so breadth hasn’t expanded at all; third, its 24-hour trading volume has increased from 200,000 last night to 880,000 USD, volume has indeed returned several times over, but 880,000 is still thin liquidity for a coin with a market cap over 5 million, which doesn’t change its vulnerability to quick pumps and dumps.
Focus on one level: the 24-hour high of 0.00762 coincides exactly with the Bollinger upper band. Only a volume-backed hold above this level counts as a second wave; a low-volume failure to break through is just a descending consolidation rebound, with support below at 0.0070. My stance is clear: the first rebound after the dip should primarily be treated as a window to reduce positions, not a reason to chase higher. Wait for MAGIC to lead again or for BTC to move out of the 81,600 to 83,500 range before turning bullish. Not investment advice, DYOR
#PIXEL #GameFiSaw another coin with a short-term violent pump $MAGIC, surging 87% in 24 hours, climbing all the way from 0.06 in just a few days, doubling in gains.
Honestly, this coin belongs to the gaming sector, which I usually don't research or consider for spot positions. Purely from the market perspective, this rally is entirely a sentiment-driven move fueled by concentrated capital inflows. The short-term surge is too fast, with an overextended increase and no solid trend support.
Looking at the contract long-short data, currently short accounts make up as much as 71.11%, with the vast majority of the market shorting in line with the trend, betting on a pullback after the spike. This pattern is a classic extreme capital game: a large number of shorts are concentrated in ambush, so if the main force continues to push up, it can easily trigger a short squeeze; but conversely, after continuous violent gains, a huge amount of profit-taking positions have accumulated, and capital can cash out and flee at any time, making the correction risk very high.
Based on this logic: I tried to enter a short position, but unexpectedly got trapped right away 😂
Fortunately, the position size is small this time, so I can average down by adding on dips and slowly wait to break even.
Is there anyone more familiar with this coin? Not sure if after this volatility, I can smoothly make some money for a cup of milk tea and exit!
⚠️ The above is just my personal trading experience and does not constitute investment advice. Profit and loss are your own responsibility.加密货币的估值：没有现金流，怎么定价？ 一句话：股票可以算利润，房子可以算租金，比特币没有利润也没有租金，但市场每天都在给它定价。怎么做到的？ 你打开行情软件，看到BTC有价格、ETH有市值、某个DeFi代币有FDV。但如果你用传统金融的方法去套，会发现根本套不上。股票有每股收益，债券有票面利率，房产有租金回报。加密货币呢？比特币不产生现金流，以太坊没有分红，大部分代币连董事会都没有。 第一层：先把资产分类，别用一种尺子量所有币。 不同加密资产的估值逻辑完全不同。比特币更像商品，靠稀缺性定价。以太坊更像平台，靠网络使用定价。DeFi协议代币开始有真实现金流，可以像公司一样估值。稳定币则根本不需要估值，它就是锚定。 第二层：比特币——没有现金流，但有稀缺性。 比特币没有任何未来现金流，所以DCF用不了。但黄金也没有现金流，照样有人给它定价。比特币的估值框架从商品逻辑出发：供给端看减半周期、矿工成本、S2F比率（当前超过100，远超黄金的55到65）。需求端看地址增长、ETF流入、机构配置比例。 S2F比率衡量的是稀缺程度。黄金的S2F在55到65之间，意味着按当前开采速度，需要55到65【Ethereum liquidations hit $356 million, this wave of bulls really paid the tuition】
$ETH has dropped much harder than BTC this time. In the past 24 hours, Ethereum contract liquidations totaled about $356 million, surpassing BTC's $298 million; total network liquidations reached approximately $1.19 billion, with over $1 billion from long positions. This is not an ordinary pullback; leveraged funds betting on a rebound were wiped out in a concentrated move.
What's worse is that when ETH fell to around $2490, the US spot ETH ETF experienced continuous net outflows for several days, totaling about $640 million from September 29 to October 8. Contract longs couldn't hold on, and spot funds didn't clearly step in, so the price lacks the momentum to rebound immediately.
Another detail: after Trump signaled a pause on military action against Iran, BTC rebounded to about $82,400, and shorts started getting squeezed. But liquidation doesn't mean $356 million of bottom-fishing funds entered; it only indicates leveraged positions were forcibly closed.
I'm not in a hurry to bottom-fish ETH for now. The previous drop was sharp, and the rebound could be strong, but the continuous ETF outflows haven't been reversed yet. If ETH can hold above $2500 and spot buying picks up, it would look more like a bottom; if the rebound lacks volume and ETF outflows continue, this liquidation might just be a clearing on the way down.#SepFOMCMinutesHikeWatch and #BTCETFBiggestOutflow are trending side by side on OKX Orbit. Most will read them as two stories.
I read one. If traders still price a possible Fed hike, ETF money has less reason to stay. The outflow may say more about rates than about $BTC . That makes the ETF number a rates signal first and a Bitcoin signal second.
Which moves first: the minutes or the flows? Did the market already price the minutes in?
@OKX Orbit #OKXOrbitTopics $ETH held a 100x short position until morning! Floating profit 157%! From 2528 down to 2488, surviving the volatility shows true resilience!
Retraced from 176% to 156%, still holding a 1.57x big gain. Those who understand 100x know—one sharp move pierces everything. Lock in profits without hesitation, set stop loss at 2500 to protect the base position, then watch 2450.
No giving back means winning, steady finish! 100x doesn’t cling to fights, take profits and leave the rest to fate, a solid morning! $BTC $ZEC
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 🔥 If you could only go long on one among $BTC, $ETH, $SOL, and $ZEC, who would you bet on? Don’t rush to call it—first, take a look at the capital flows.
💰 BTC: $209 million net inflow in 12 hours, showing short-term support; but $989 million net outflow in 24 hours and $7.37 billion net outflow over 30 days indicate that large funds are still cautious. A rebound is possible, but the trend is not stable.
📉 ETH: $1.125 billion net outflow in 24 hours, also weak in the short term. To break out of continuous rebounds, capital flow needs to turn positive first.
⚡ SOL: $55.19 million net inflow in 12 hours, showing short-term sparks; however, $2.48 billion net outflow over 30 days means mid-term pressure remains unresolved. Don’t just look at half-day data.
🟢 ZEC: $100 million net inflow in 12 hours, $1.3172 million net inflow over 30 days, the most unique capital structure among the four. But inflows are just clues, not guarantees of a rise; liquidity risks must also be guarded against.
🛡️ My strategy: Don’t chase sharp rallies or guess absolute bottoms. Wait for price stabilization and capital inflow to appear simultaneously before considering entry. For stability, choose BTC; for flexibility, consider ZEC, but always keep some position reserved.
Comment below: Who would you bet on? #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 #OKX以250亿美元估值完成战略融资 $ETH
Real trading technical blogger, sharing daily! Although the position size is not large, the number of positions is quite many, aiming for qualitative change!
Hello everyone, today is Saturday in the weekend, US stock market is closed, and the excellent Nasdaq traders must be resting too!
In yesterday's post, we mentioned the resistance at 2514 and 2501 above, and yesterday the highest point also reached 2520 (pulled 6-19 dollars more, which is reasonable)
But the downside has not yet tested 2453 and 2433, so let's see on Sunday night or Monday. Will there be an opportunity? If there is no major news support, the worst result would be a fluctuation between 2433-2514, waiting for CPI