Orbit Post Sitemap
$BTC around $77K and $ETH near $2.4K — the macro backdrop is finally starting to cooperate.
Treasury buybacks, a softer dollar, stronger ETF inflows and expectations of easier Fed policy are all adding fuel to risk assets.
But I’m not treating this rally as confirmed yet.
The real test is whether institutional demand can keep absorbing supply. Around $1.6B in weekly spot BTC ETF inflows is encouraging, but sustained flows matter more than one strong week.
$BTC $ETH
#BTC77KFlowTest HIP-4 adds a permissionless event prediction market to Hyperliquid, allowing traders to trade prediction contracts within the same account. This is expected to bring new fee revenue, lock up a large amount of HYPE tokens to reduce circulation, and push the platform from a simple contract DEX to a comprehensive trading infrastructure. However, there are also issues such as high market creation barriers that may lead to monopolization by large holders, potential disputes in event settlement, and increased regulatory pressure due to its gambling attributes. This represents a fundamental upgrade benefit, but the value ultimately depends on whether the prediction market can generate real and sustainable trading volume.
This is only a project logic explanation and does not constitute investment advice. Account Position Divergence Radar
Is the directional consensus real or fake? Just compare the account proportions with the top holdings.
$BEAT: Neither all accounts, top accounts, nor top holdings are aligned in the same direction; currently, it looks more like a divergence market. Price rises while positions decrease, indicating the driving force likely comes from old positions exiting. When the metrics are not aligned on one side, first observe which side the top holdings converge to, then see if the price responds accordingly.
$DOGE: More accounts are bullish, but the top position weights are bearish, so the apparent consensus has not yet translated into position scale. The rise is not accompanied by position withdrawals; new positions have already participated, but continuation depends on subsequent price response. The top holdings need to recover towards 1 for the position weights to start matching account sentiment.
$SUI: Account direction is bullish, but top holdings are bearish; the side with more participants is temporarily not the side with heavier top positions. Price is rising while open interest is falling, which most certainly indicates position reduction driving the move, but the specific exiting party cannot be confirmed by this data alone. The account side is already bullish; next, it depends on whether the top positions are willing to shift their weight to the same side.The advantage of $OKB is its scarce supply, but the risk lies in the relatively concentrated ecosystem.
Its price is highly tied to OKX, X Layer, and related policy changes, so it cannot be fully valued in the same way as BTC.
I would define OKB as a small-position ecological investment rather than a core holding; contracts are more suitable for short-term trading and not for long-term holding. $BTC surged then pulled back with collective weakness—is this a top or a bullish continuation shakeout?
Yesterday's surge to 79,500 was wild, and today's pullback is equally panic-inducing. The entire network saw $547 million liquidated in a single day, with over 80% being forced liquidations of long positions. Many just called for a bull market restart, then immediately started calling a top.
I actually think there's no need to overreact. This drop is essentially a leverage liquidation, not a trend reversal.
In the first three days, the price climbed from 64,000 to nearly 80,000. In this short squeeze, long leverage was piled up too high, funding rates kept rising, and the position structure was inherently fragile.
At the 80,000 round number, previous trapped positions and short-term profit-taking concentrated their sell-offs. High-leverage long positions triggered a chain of forced liquidations, and the long-liquidation cascade further amplified the decline—basically, the logic of the previous short squeeze played out in reverse.
On the macro level, it's just emotional disturbance without any substantial new negative factors.
The escalation of US-Iran tensions pushed oil prices up, and the market worries about inflation persisting and delaying rate cuts, but these are old topics repeatedly fermenting. The core logic supporting this rebound—regulatory easing and US Treasury declines—remains intact.
Moreover, BTC spot ETFs have seen net inflows for five consecutive days; institutional long-term funds haven't fled. The sell-offs are all short-term speculative leveraged positions.
I reduced most of my long positions at lower levels earlier, keeping the rest with proper stop-loss to protect capital. If the strong support zone between 74,000-75,000 holds, I will consider scaling back in. Leveraged washouts are normal in a bull market; if you don't clear out floating positions, the rally won't go far.
Did you take profits or get trapped this round? Where do you see the support level?
$ETH What truly deserves attention in Samsung's recent move is not the size of the "$80 billion" figure, but a signal: the money earned from AI chips is starting to flow from capital expenditures and the supply chain to shareholders. On August 21, Samsung Electronics announced that it expects to return 90 trillion to 110 trillion Korean won to shareholders by 2026, equivalent to about $65 billion to $80 billion, setting a record high in South Korean corporate history and more than five times Samsung's 2020 shareholder return record. The company plans to distribute about 30 trillion won in cash dividends in the third quarter, with the remaining funds to be decided based on full-year performance in early 2027, in forms including cash dividends, stock buybacks, and cancellations. This is not a sudden "generosity." What has truly changed behind the scenes is Samsung's cash flow. One of the biggest conflicts in the semiconductor industry over the past few years has been whether the money earned by companies should be used for expansion or returned to shareholders. But the AI era has shifted this balance. Previously, the market worried about the downward price cycle of memory chips; if companies expanded production too aggressively, they could easily fall into a cycle of "higher profits, greater capital expenditures, and ultimately cash flow pressure." Now the situation is different. AI data centers are voraciously consuming high-bandwidth memory, especially HBM. AI computing giants like Nvidia are continuously expanding data center investments, directly pushing memory chips from traditional cyclical products to an essential part of AI infrastructure. Samsung has naturally benefited from this cycle. More importantly, Samsung is now not just "earning more," but is beginning to have the capability on a large scaleThe cryptocurrency market suddenly crashed.
$BTC, $ETH, $XRP, $SOL, and $HYPE all experienced intense volatility within minutes.
$XRP was hit especially hard, dropping from $1.70 to $1.38 before quickly rebounding.
#BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？ #ETH强势拉升，空头清算超11亿美元 #美财政部扩大长债回购，30年美债高位回落
Besent's market rescue lasted only one day, with all three major stock indexes falling, Walmart selling off, and AI storage and optical communications breaking out against the trend
The 30-year US Treasury yield has rebounded to 5.28%, approaching the critical 5.3% level. With a $40 trillion US debt scale plus a 6% deficit rate, the Treasury issuing new bonds to buy back old ones is just a small spoon scooping water from a bucket
The chain reaction this brings to the market
▶️ US Stocks
Valuation reshaping and policy failure
▶️ Tech stocks bleeding
High yields directly raise discount rates, and the financing costs for giants investing heavily in AI cannot be lowered
▶️ Confidence collapse
The market is not afraid of high interest rates, but of policy failure. Even the Treasury's intervention cannot suppress rates, accelerating risk aversion
▶️ Crypto market
Short-term drainage, mid-to-long-term nourishment
▶️ Short-term pressure
Still has risk asset attributes, fiat liquidity tightening suppresses short-term performance
▶️ Long-term hedge
US Treasuries are just moving from left hand to right hand, which ironically gives the loudest advertisement to assets like Bitcoin with a fixed total supply
Endgame trend forecast: Deficit will not decrease, yields breaking 5.3% and even surging to 5.5% is only a matter of time. As long as long-term rates forcibly push US stocks and the real economy into crisis, it will trigger the endgame, forcing the Fed to cut rates and flood liquidity, at which point US stocks and the crypto market will see a strong rebound
DYOR Yesterday, I didn't anticipate $BTC rising to $73,000, and today I didn't expect Bitcoin to reach $79,000. However, among my close friends, there are indeed two very extreme approaches to this surge. Some of the more traditional friends have almost completely sold off all the Bitcoin or $IBIT they recently bought, as they are not very optimistic about this rebound, believing that the rally has peaked and a deeper correction will follow.
Even selling at a loss is done to free up funds to buy more during the correction, which I can understand. On the other hand, a group of quantitative and trading-native crypto investors believe this is the start of a bull market, firmly convinced that Bitcoin's rise is a long-suppressed breakout, with expectations that Bitcoin could at least return to around $90,000.
As for me, I am a relatively conservative investor. I've always said that my ideal price, the price at which I am willing to spend real money to buy Bitcoin, is below $65,000. So I have been trading back and forth with dual coins, and at most, I can accept BTC near $70,000. But if it goes higher, I might not be in a hurry to buy. Also, my biggest hope for 2026 is not now, but after the midterm elections.
Personally, I think the best time to enter is around October, and to exit in December or January next year. This is my current personal view. Also, looking at the current US stock market situation, I don't believe BTC can significantly surge independently of the US stock market. Although it might be because it fell too much before, a catch-up rally is unlikely to be like this. So recently, I've been considering hedging around $77,000. Many retail investors haven't exited yet and are still holding altcoins, waiting for the $BTC market to pull back and funds to rotate into altcoins. I believe this time there might not be a large-scale fund rotation because the recent surge in $BTC and $ETH was mostly driven by ETF inflows. The probability of ETF funds withdrawing and flowing into altcoins is very low.Bitcoin breaks $70,000, the structural trace left in the market by the 10,000-point capitulation of short positions. How should the price increase caused by the short squeeze be distinguished from real demand inflow? The original trader entered a 5x leverage short at BTC 69,646 and maintained additional margin while enduring about a $10,000 adverse move over 8 weeks. Although this is a single case, it shows that the leverage shorts accumulated in the derivatives market were forcibly liquidated during the price rise, amplifying the upward momentum. The problem is what new demand will drive further increases after this short squeeze is exhausted. - From a market structural perspective, a significant part of this rise is liquidation-induced. Short positions were forcibly closed, bringing buying volume into the market, which pulled prices up again and created a feedback loop causing further liquidations. - The difference from actual spot demand can be confirmed by the speed of increase in spot trading volume on exchanges and open interest in derivatives. Liquidation-driven rises are characterized by a sharp decrease in open interest. Solana Slot Time Compressed to 350 Milliseconds: The Ultimate Trade-off Between Extreme Performance and Node Threshold
The Solana mainnet target slot time has been successfully compressed to 350 milliseconds, with a full sprint towards the ultimate goal of 200 milliseconds.
Sub-second ultra-fast confirmations make on-chain DEX order book matching and high-frequency interactions almost as smooth as centralized exchanges, significantly reducing slippage losses and front-running wait times. However, any engineering breakthrough at this extreme level comes with a cost: high-concurrency data synchronization imposes extremely stringent requirements on the hardware computing power and network bandwidth of validator nodes, making it impossible for ordinary devices to participate.
This has sparked intense debate within the community. While the speedup improves user experience, is it causing validation power to become overly concentrated in the hands of a few professional data centers, thereby eroding the decentralization foundation of the public chain?
Supporters emphasize the genuine demand for extreme performance from hundreds of millions of users and institutional high-frequency capital in the real commercial world, while opponents worry about the dilution of censorship resistance. In fact, the public chain sector is accelerating towards specialization: some public chains adhere to the foundational value settlement ledger, while Solana clearly anchors itself in the niche of on-chain high-concurrency financial halls.
When choosing a public chain to support long-term, do you value extreme performance and ecosystem experience more, or decentralization and censorship resistance?
---
The above content represents personal views only and does not constitute any investment advice. DYOR, NFA.
#Solana主网提速，节点门槛会否上升？ Does small capital need position management?
Many people think that’s something only big capital needs to consider. Small capital is just a little, what’s the point of dividing it up?
When I was asked this question, the other party actually already had an answer in mind, hoping I would agree — small capital doesn’t need management, just go all in.
If small capital wants to grow its scale, chip allocation is an unavoidable step. Going all in is gambling on the success of one at the cost of many failures, with only a 1% chance it might be you.
The less seriously you treat the money in your hands, the less seriously that money will treat you.
This principle is actually not hard to understand.
The first level is about how to differentiate between different trading opportunities.
You have to learn to assign different weights to different opportunities.
Some opportunities are inherently more worth betting on than others. This is not based on feeling; objectively, they have more supporting factors.
For example, they resonate with key positions in the larger time frame, or their momentum is clearly stronger than usual opportunities, or they happen to be at the node where the market starts.
These factors are there, but if you ignore them and give every trade the same standard, it may seem disciplined but actually shows insufficient sensitivity to the strength of opportunities. Usually, the big profits come from just a few times, and the all-in mentioned earlier is also about placing heavy bets at key positions.
A simple method is to fix the loss to determine position size.
First, fix the loss amount for each trade, regardless of stop-loss range, and adjust the position size to make it a fixed amount.
After laying this foundation, do one more thing: reduce the size of regular orders. For example, if I originally allow myself to lose 1000 per trade, I only allocate 500 for regular trades. The saved amount is moved to opportunities I’m more confident about, giving them 1500.
Total risk remains unchanged, but the money goes where it should.
The second level is about how to prevent losing control, which is actually more important than the first point because it determines your ability to control drawdown.
I suggest physically isolating the money in your account.
Only keep the maximum amount you might use that day, and withdraw profits daily.
You can backtest your trading system to calculate the maximum number of consecutive losses in a day historically, how much was lost each time, and get an upper limit. Keep that amount in the account plus a small margin buffer.
Why must you do this?
Because losing control in trading rarely happens instantly. It’s usually a slow process you don’t notice.
The extra money in the account is normally never used for trading. When can it be used? Only in two cases: you start heavy positions, or you start holding losing trades.
The moment that money is used, losing control has already happened.
What I want to do is prevent that moment from occurring.
The third level is about how to truly realize compounding.
Many people pursue compounding, but compounding has a premise: continuity cannot be broken.
If you make money for 28 days straight but lose it all on the 29th day, compounding breaks and you have to start over.
So I prefer to do phased compounding. For example, grow from 10,000 to 20,000, withdraw the 10,000 profit, and leave only the principal in the account to continue compounding. Even if this account is wiped out, you still have the profit in hand, so you don’t go to zero.
To summarize, there are three things:
First, differentiate opportunity weights: give more to good ones, less to ordinary ones, total risk unchanged.
Second, withdraw profits daily, keep only the money needed for the day in the account, physically cutting off the possibility of losing control.
Third, phased compounding: pocket the profits first, use profits to gamble, not the principal.
This is my practical understanding of growing small capital. It may not apply to everyone, for reference only.
$BTC $ETH $SOL Some personal thoughts:
1. ETH has already strongly broken through the historical high of the April 2026 rebound. From the perspective of market linkage logic, after ETH breaks out first, the probability of BTC following up with a breakout has reached 90%, so at this stage, there is no need to overly worry about whether BTC can immediately break new highs.
2. The collective surge of altcoins in this round is a concentrated release of pent-up emotions after multiple rounds of halving, representing a retaliatory rebound after long-term suppression. But it is important to distinguish the essential difference: BTC and ETH have Wall Street institutional funds and ETF products as their backing, while the vast majority of altcoins lack institutional fundamental support, and their market movements rely more on market sentiment.
3. Combining the above two points for practical strategy: if your altcoin holdings have significantly outperformed BTC and ETH, during this wave of euphoric rise, switching part of the altcoin profits back into mainstream coins is a good way to guard against large drawdowns. Of course, nothing is absolute; if you hold a strong, speculative coin, rebalancing may also risk missing out on further gains.
$BTC $ETH
⚠️For personal market thoughts only, not investment advice
#BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？
#黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战
#三星股东回报落地，最高约800亿美元 #白宫峰会：特朗普称曾讨论购入BTC
$BTC Let's talk about the market's expected pricing.
The market has already priced in quite a few positives: continuous ETF inflows, favorable regulatory policies, institutional endorsements, and rate cut speculations.
That means the current price above 70,000 has already prepaid some of the future good news. If subsequent news only meets expectations, it will be difficult to trigger a new round of sharp rallies; only major positive surprises beyond expectations can push the price to the next level. If the positives fall short of expectations, a "buy the rumor, sell the fact" decline is likely.
The contradiction in time cycles
Long-term institutions allocate quarterly or annually and don't care about fluctuations of a few thousand points.
Secondary market traders mostly look at hourly and daily charts, hoping for daily gains.
Their demands are completely misaligned. Institutions accumulate slowly and cannot satisfy short-term players' expectations of "daily green candles," which is the root cause of frequent high-level oscillations.
Observing altcoins as a barometer
BTC remains strong, but altcoins generally show weakness, which is a signal worth noting.
A truly broad and hot bull market will see funds spill over to altcoins after BTC stabilizes, driving widespread altcoin gains.
Currently, funds are highly concentrated in BTC, and new external capital is not flooding the entire crypto market.
Once BTC starts to pull back, altcoins without capital support will fall much more than Bitcoin. Those holding altcoins should be especially cautious of the cascading liquidation risk caused by BTC's pullback.
Another perspective on the futures market
Besides the risk of long liquidations, short positions also deserve attention.
Price oscillations at high levels lead traders to frequently short at the top. When short positions accumulate to a certain scale, short squeezes can trigger rapid rebounds in the short term.
This causes a double-edged high-level market where chasing longs gets trapped and shorting at the top is easily stopped out by spikes. In the current range, both longs and shorts are difficult to play.
$ETH $XRP er📊 $CORE Contract Liquidation Update (August 22)
Direction changed three times, volume extremely small, only $150,000 liquidated in 24 hours, typical low liquidity invalid market...
Time Total Liquidation Long Liquidation Short Liquidation
1 hour $2,400.23 $0 $2,400.23
4 hours $3,437.93 $1,037.70 $2,400.23
12 hours $147,600 $104,900 $42,700
24 hours $150,100 $106,500 $43,700
1-hour short position monopoly (longs zero), volume $24,000; 4-hour shorts continued control at 2.3 times, volume rose to $24,000; 12-hour longs reversed at 2.46 times, volume surged to $104,900; 24-hour longs closed at 2.44 times, liquidation $106,500 vs shorts $43,700, total liquidation $150,100. 12-hour liquidation accounts for 98.3% of 24-hour total, concentration extremely high but absolute volume very small, direction switches frequently but volume insufficient, no reference value. Leverage recommended to compress within 3x, liquidity very poor, not suitable for trading.
🔥 Market Indicator | August 22
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: capital is simultaneously reshaping global asset pricing logic from three directions—Bitcoin approaching $80,000, gold breaking $4600, Samsung launching a record $80 billion shareholder return.
₿ BTC Approaching $80,000: ETF attracts funds for five consecutive days, short squeeze turns to institutional relay
Bitcoin rose about 23% this week, the largest weekly gain since March 2023. Price once approached $79,500, just a step away from $80,000.
This rally switched from a "short squeeze" to "institutional relay." Thirteen US spot Bitcoin ETFs have attracted over $1 billion inflows this week, potentially the largest weekly net inflow since January. BlackRock IBIT saw $239.3 million inflow in a single day, net inflows for five consecutive days. CryptoQuant data shows significant institutional capital returning. As shorts retreat and ETFs take over, Bitcoin is shifting from a short squeeze to a fundamentals-driven rise.
🥇 Gold Breaks $4600: US Treasury bond safe-haven halo fades, gold reclaims throne
Spot gold rose above $4600/oz, a three-month high. The US dollar index fell below 99, and the US Treasury expanded bond repurchase scale, triggering deep market concerns about fiscal conditions.
Bridgewater Fund's Dalio publicly warned: US debt crisis will arrive in about 3 years, possibly as soon as 1 year, recommending selling US bonds and allocating 10%-15% of portfolios to gold. As 30-year US bond yields rise above 5.3% and gold breaks $4600, the market signals that bonds are no longer the sole safe haven.
🏦 Samsung's Up to $80 Billion Shareholder Return: The "Money-Splashing Moment" of AI Dividends
Samsung Electronics officially approved the 2026 shareholder return plan, expected to return 90 trillion to 110 trillion KRW (about $65 billion to $80 billion), a record in Korean corporate history. Q3 will distribute about 30 trillion KRW (about $21.2 billion) in cash dividends. Two days earlier, SK Hynix announced a 40 trillion KRW buyback and cancellation plan. Within one week, the two storage giants committed to returning over 150 trillion KRW. Money earned from AI is being returned to shareholders at an unprecedented speed.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the same picture: Bitcoin shifts from short squeeze to ETF-driven, approaching $80,000; gold breaks $4600, challenging bonds' safe-haven status; Samsung announces $80 billion shareholder return, signaling large-scale realization of AI dividends. CORE contracts liquidated only $150,000 all day, a low liquidity invalid market, sharply contrasting with the huge funds in the three main themes. When crypto, precious metals, and tech giants simultaneously exert force—capital is seeking new pricing anchors across three tracks. #BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？
#黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战
#三星股东回报落地，最高约800亿美元 This round for ETH is not a follow-up rally, it's a finishing blow—but the blow has already hit its own people. $ETH
The reason is not complicated, three layers stacked together:
The Treasury Department doubled long-term bond repurchases from 2 billion to over 4 billion per session, a "quasi-QE" move, pushing long-term yields down, and high-beta assets like ETH get hit first;
The spot ETH ETF absorbed about $500 million in 4 days, with BlackRock's ETHA alone taking in over $150 million in a single day—this is "real institutional money," not retail hype;
Shorts were previously squeezed too hard; once 2000 and 2300 broke, there were chain liquidations, with $1.69 billion in shorts cleared over 3 days, forcing a short squeeze that pushed the price firmly above 2500.
But you need to understand the spike this afternoon:
ETH just lost 2400 but then pulled back to 2500, with $523 million liquidated across the network in 1 hour, of which $448 million were long positions liquidated.
In the morning, shorts got hit; in the afternoon, new long entrants got hit. It's not that the price can't go above 2500, but every bullish candle is helping the market makers wash out a batch of new leverage. $ETH $NTES The focus of this Q2 report is not the decline in profit figures themselves, but that core gaming revenue and gross profit are still growing, but losses from stock investments, impairment provisions, and changes in tax rates have dragged down quarterly profit attributable to shareholders. Looking at it separately, the main business performance and financial statement profits are not in the same direction. Let's look at the core data first: NetEase's Q2 net revenue was 30.107 billion yuan, up 7.9% year-on-year; Gross profit was 21.217 billion yuan, up 17.5% year-on-year; operating profit was 12.089 billion yuan, up 33.4% year-on-year. Revenue growth was not particularly high, but operating costs fell 9.7% year-on-year, and operating expenses increased by only 1.5%, indicating that profit improvement mainly came from the cost and revenue-sharing structure of the gaming business. However, the profit attributable to shareholders was 6.981 billion yuan, down 18.8% year-on-year and 34.6% quarter-on-quarter; Non-GAAP net profit was 7.7 billion yuan, down 18.9% year-on-year. This is also where the market needs to focus on differentiation: core operating profit is growing, but profit attributable to shareholders is dragged down by non-operating items. Gaming business remains the core business. Revenue from games and related value-added services reached 25.023 billion yuan, up 9.7% year-on-year, accounting for about 83% of the company's total revenue; segment gross profit was 19.049 billion yuan, up 19.0% year-on-year. Among them, online gaming revenue accounted for 97.7% of the segment's revenue, continuing to rise from 97.1% in the same period last year. The company disclosed that the "Fantasy Westward Journey" series and "Yan Yun Sixteen Sounds" drove year-on-year revenue growth, while "Identity V" and "Egg"The feeling of holding through a position, those who haven't experienced it really don't understand.
Dogecoin is just 20 points away from breaking even. Honestly, several times before I saw my account in the red and felt anxious, my finger was hovering over the sell button, but I didn't press it. Now finally, it's about to turn around. I hope Doge can make a breakthrough tomorrow and hit first place on the gainers list.
Looking back now, this market rally is completely different from before. Previously, when prices rose, some people would run away, but this time it's not like that—institutions are pouring real money in. On August 21, the US BTC and ETH spot ETFs had a net inflow of $826 million in one day, and the numbers speak for themselves.
Bitcoin surged straight to $79,600, rising nearly 20% in three days. The stagnant market of the past few months was suddenly stirred up. The funniest thing is CNBC's Jim Cramer, who recently scared people with quantum computing and urged selling, now has turned around and is calling to buy. Even he is starting to panic, which shows the market sentiment has completely reversed.
My own judgment is simple: watch the ETH inflow data. As long as this number keeps rising, any pullback is a chance to buy cheap, not a signal to run. Of course, stay alert—if inflows slow down later, those who made money at the top might dump their holdings.
So my plan is to hold my base position firmly, don't get off easily, but also don't add leverage to chase highs at this level. I've held on for so long, gotta keep going!
$BTC $ETH $DOGE
#BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？ In July 2026, Visa launched a new system called the Visa Stablecoin Platform. Banks, fintech companies, and payment service providers can use the same platform to mint, redeem, custody, and transfer stablecoins, while connecting bank accounts, wallets, and internal approval processes. The most interesting aspect of this development is the change in Visa's role. In the past, it was responsible for connecting banks, consumers, and merchants; today, it is beginning to integrate blockchain directly into its settlement system. As of March 2026, Visa's stablecoin settlement business has an annualized scale of about $7 billion, with a 50% growth in a single quarter. The pilot currently supports nine blockchains, allowing participants to continue settlements on weekends and holidays without waiting for traditional banks to reopen. Visa's stablecoin settlement announcement and the Visa Stablecoin Platform show that stablecoins are gradually evolving from trading media within the crypto community to backend currency for the global payment system. From "on-chain dollars" to payment infrastructure Stablecoins initially grew rapidly mainly due to crypto trading demand. The crypto market operates 24/7, and traders need a relatively stable-priced dollar substitute that can move across different platforms at any time. USDT and USDC thus became settlement tools among exchanges, on-chain protocols, and market makers. This infrastructure was later discovered by cross-border trade, freelancers, overseas enterprises, and emerging market users. Traditional cross-border payments often require going through exchangeIn a weakening market environment, Tesla achieved a single-day counter-trend surge of over 5% driven by expectations from the Roadster technology demonstration. The core contradiction lies in the high valuation premium driven by short-term events versus the incompatible pace of commercialization.
The main theme in the US stock market shows risk contraction, with the S&P 500 down 1.43% for the week and the Nasdaq down 2.05% for the week, as funds generally reduce tech weightings. Tesla gained localized liquidity clustering under speculation fueled by SpaceX’s cold air propulsion technology demonstration and its positioning as a limited-edition track toy, leading the single-day rise of over 5%, indicating that the trading theme is temporarily dominated by geek concepts and risk appetite pulses.
This rally is driven by event-driven incremental funds rather than macro inflation or overall macro liquidity improvement. Non-road compliance and high pricing determine that this model is unlikely to convert into predictable financial performance in the short term. The increased concentration of chips in high positions raises volatility risks when subsequent facts materialize.
The bullish scenario requires the on-site demonstration at the Texas test site to exceed expectations, accompanied by specific reservation data and a clear delivery schedule. If the demonstration succeeds, the preference squeeze effect will extend to other sectors. $TSLA breaking short-term highs will shift the valuation anchor to the SpaceX synergy premium, forcing bearish traders to cover their positions.
The failure signal for this bullish scenario is the lack of technical details during the demonstration or official clarification that commercialization is limited to a few VIP track hosting modes, causing funds to shift focus to short-term profit contributions.
The bearish scenario triggers if the US stock market continues to lose ground before the demonstration or if the demonstration fails to show the practical value of the hovering function, triggering event-driven sell-offs. When long positions exceed the absorption limit, a wave of long position liquidations will push prices rapidly back to the market valuation midpoint.
If the market stops falling and rebounds and the test site demonstration shows strong technical barriers, selling pressure will be absorbed by new structurally biased funds, invalidating the bearish scenario.
In the next 7 days, close monitoring is needed for the specific timetable announcement of the Texas McGregor test site demonstration, the secondary suppression of tech stock valuations by market interest rate changes, and signals of market index bottoming and recovery.
#黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战 #BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？ #闪迪高位波动，存储股估值分歧加剧$BTC has too many FOMO-driven trades, destined to end with stop-loss retracements.
It rose from 62,000 to 79,600, an increase of over 17,000 dollars.
There was almost no effective pullback.
But I see that the higher it goes, the more retail investors jump in.
Leverage is even increasing.
Now it's bad, $640 million worth of long positions have been liquidated just like that.
I ask those who got liquidated, does it hurt?
When the epidemic is waning, and suddenly there's a brief revival, do you really think it has come back to life?
Without significant positive news and clear capital inflows,
the bull market can't be considered a return.
Just like the last bull market was driven by companies opening positions and holding coins, and massive ETF inflows.
But those positions have already paid a heavy price.
So, that trend has passed.
Now, only a few ETFs can influence the market inflows and outflows, or you could say one dominates.
The current scale is still not small.
The last bull market saw inflows from zero to hundreds of billions.
Now with hundreds of billions, can it still absorb hundreds of billions more inflows?
Unlikely!
Also, MicroStrategy has changed its strategy.
In the last bull market, it bought tens of billions of dollars worth of Bitcoin.
Can it buy tens of billions more in the future?
No way, even if it doesn't sell coins, it's already contributing to the crypto space.
Next, the possibility of MSCI kicking it out of the index is increasing.
This means tens of billions of dollars in stocks will be forcibly sold.
Stock prices will fall, financing ability will decline.
Its strategy will no longer work.
Saving the company or saving Bitcoin, I think it will choose to save the company.
Therefore, the likelihood of selling Bitcoin to buy back stocks is very high.
Besides, it started doing this last month, and if prices keep rising, it is very likely to continue selling.
So, without new capital support, at least capital support of MicroStrategy's scale, the coin price will struggle to rise.
Don't expect ETFs to save Bitcoin, because current ETFs are short-term risk capital.
Money flows in this morning, and may flow out in the afternoon.
Far less stable than companies, institutions, and some strategy firms. $BTC around $77K and $ETH near $2.4K — the macro backdrop is finally starting to cooperate.
Treasury buybacks, a softer dollar, stronger ETF inflows and expectations of easier Fed policy are all adding fuel to risk assets.
But I’m not treating this rally as confirmed yet.
The real test is whether institutional demand can keep absorbing supply. Around $1.6B in weekly spot BTC ETF inflows is encouraging, but sustained flows matter more than one strong week.
$BTC $ETH #BTC77KFlowTest ⚔️Geopolitical conflicts continue to escalate: Iran's Foreign Minister states that the US's destructive economic actions will ultimately fail; the military declares control over the sea area east of the Strait of Hormuz, threatening to deliver a historic blow to opponents, and lawmakers have submitted a proposal to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel has once again airstruck southern Lebanon, with geopolitical black swan events potentially impacting global risk assets at any time.
3. Multi-cycle technical analysis of the crypto market
BTC is currently trading in the range of $76,886‑$77,143, with a 24-hour increase of 6.8%. The cumulative gain for this week has reached 24%, marking the strongest single-week performance since March 2023, with an intraday high of $79,400.
After a round of violent short squeezes, most of the bullish narratives have already been priced in, making it no longer suitable to blindly chase the upside. The market has officially shifted from a trending unilateral phase to a timing-based game. Going forward, focus on tracking the progress of US Treasury liquidity implementation, while remaining alert to sharp spikes caused by geopolitical news. High-level volatility is expected to continue expanding. #黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战
Gold price breaks 4600, a historic high
Those who bought are already thinking about selling, those who haven't bought are panicking
US bonds are rising, but their cost-effectiveness is decreasing
The logic behind gold's rise is very conventional—Trump's tariffs plus the Iran situation create dual safe havens
But the 4600 level can no longer be explained by "buying gold for safety"
It seems more like people are starting to doubt whether bonds can still be considered safe assets
So my judgment is that gold prices can still surge in the short term, 4600-4700 needs consolidation
But the real big problem is the shaken faith in bonds
This is actually a long-term positive for BTC—In a "worst of the worst" era, no one is trash
$BTC $XAU Gold has also broken through, standing above $4600, hitting a three-month high.
The US dollar has fallen to its lowest level in nearly three months, coupled with concerns over the US fiscal deficit, market worries about the dollar's creditworthiness are heating up. The latest data confirms this — the main contract for New York gold futures closed up nearly 2%, finishing above $4660.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, has spoken out again, this time giving specific allocation advice: underweight bonds, allocate 10% to 15% of personal assets to gold, and add some Bitcoin. His logic is simple — the US has $5.5 trillion in fiscal revenue this year, $7.5 trillion in spending, a $2 trillion gap, with interest payments alone close to $1 trillion, and $10 trillion in debt to be refinanced. He predicts the debt crisis could erupt as soon as within three years.
Interestingly, the Treasury's intervention in long-term bond yields lasted less than a day, with long-end rates still held at high levels. Nomura characterizes the combination of rising gold, falling dollar, and strengthening Bitcoin as a "pressure release valve" — Washington wants to stabilize interest rates, but market anxiety has shifted elsewhere.
On the Bitcoin side, the recent 90-day correlation with gold has risen to the highest since the pandemic, with both assets following the logic of "hedging against currency depreciation." Both gold and Bitcoin are surging, raising increasing questions about whether traditional bonds can still serve as safe-haven assets.
#黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战 In October 2014, when Lisa Su took over as AMD's CEO, the company had little room for error. The PC market was entering a downturn, Intel firmly controlled the high-end processors, and Nvidia was continuously expanding in the graphics card sector. AMD's product performance lagged behind, gross margins declined, and the market even began to speculate whether it would be acquired or broken up. That year, AMD's revenue was about $5.51 billion, with a net loss of $403 million, year-end cash and marketable securities of about $1.04 billion, but debt as high as $2.21 billion. By 2015, revenue further shrank to $3.99 billion, and losses in the computing and graphics business expanded to $502 million. At that time, AMD was like a marathon runner carrying debt, with two competitors ahead who had more cash and greater technological leads. Breathing room gained through game consoles AMD was able to survive the most dangerous phase, thanks first to Sony and Microsoft. During the PC processor slowdown, AMD secured semi-custom chip orders for the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One. Although the gross margin on game console chips was not impressive, it provided stable large-scale shipments and cash flow, allowing the company to continue funding R&D. This was a typical survival deal: first secure cash flow, then bet limited resources on products that determine the future. After Lisa Su took office, AMD did not chase all markets simultaneously. AMD narrowed its focus, concentrating R&D on high-performance computing, server processors, and the new generation Zen architecture. Hormuz is open! $BTC Bitcoin just touched 80,000 then plunged, is the script about to change?
The Iraqi president personally confirmed that some oil tankers have been allowed to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has also given the nod.
A couple of days ago, the number of ships passing through Hormuz was halved, and $CL oil prices soared to $94. Bitcoin took advantage and surged, reaching a high of $79,555, nearly hitting the 80,000 mark. But once the news came out, it plunged 1.42% in 15 minutes, dropping directly from 78,592 to 76,500.
Tang Seng's personal view: This wave of rise is largely driven by geopolitical risk-hedging funds. Now that the risk premium has retreated, profit-taking naturally runs away. Don’t be fooled by the 80,000 round number; money from geopolitical speculation comes fast and goes fast.
For the crypto market, Hormuz opening = risk aversion cooling = short-term pressure. But squeezing the bubble now will make the subsequent move more stable.
What should players do? Don’t chase highs, wait for a pullback and stabilization before acting. Want to know the most stable position to buy? Follow Tang Seng for daily real-time analysis! #BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？ $BTC $ETH #三星股东回报落地，最高约800亿美元 At 1 PM today, the crypto market experienced a rapid pulse surge, with BTC quickly spiking to around $79,400 and ETH simultaneously strengthening to $2,530. This afternoon's rapid rally was not triggered by any sudden major news but was the result of multiple forces converging. On the macro level, expectations for improved liquidity from the US expanding long-term bond repurchases continued to ferment, US Treasury yields remained low, the dollar weakened, global risk appetite stayed high, and gold and US tech stocks strengthened in tandem, providing a supportive environment for crypto assets. Coupled with rising expectations for US crypto-friendly regulation, the market anticipates the implementation of digital asset compliance legislation, with continuous net inflows into spot ETFs and institutional buying steadily supporting the market. The core driver of the 1 PM rapid surge was a short squeeze effect in the derivatives market. After prices broke key resistance levels, a large number of stop-loss orders were triggered, forcing shorts to close positions passively. The buy orders from these liquidations further pushed prices upward, creating a short-term acceleration that amplified the afternoon's gains. A large volume of short positions was liquidated within 24 hours, further igniting bullish sentiment. Key reference points: BTC strong resistance at the $80,000 round number, short-term support at $76,500, strong support at $74,500; ETH resistance at $2,600, short-term support at $2,420, strong support at $2,300. After several consecutive days of gains, the market has accumulated substantial short-term profits $BTC Climbed back above $77,500, briefly approaching $79,500, with a weekly gain close to 23%; $ETH has also regained above $2,300, with market risk appetite clearly rebounding. The driving forces behind this rally are changing: US spot BTC ETFs recorded a cumulative net inflow of about $1.6 billion from Monday to Thursday, with Thursday reaching about $606 million, marking one of the strongest single-day inflows in months. Meanwhile, the U.S. Treasury plans to increase the amount of long-term Treasury repurchases from about $2 billion each to at least $4 billion, prompting the market to reprice liquidity and expectations of a weaker dollar. Additionally, large-scale short liquidations have further amplified the pace of the rise, with short liquidations in the crypto market exceeding $4.3 billion since Wednesday. But stay calm: a rapid rally in a short period can easily accumulate FOMO, leverage, and profit-taking pressure. Next, focus on two key positions: 🔹 BTC: Can $76K–$77K turn into new support 🔹? ETH: Can $2.30K–$2.35K hold steadily? If ETF funds continue to take hold after price pullbacks and spot demand remains strong, then this round of rally may have a second phase. Conversely, if the rally starts to rely mainly on high leverage and short squeezes, volatility could quickly amplify. The most important thing now is not chasing the rally, but observing whether the capital flow can keep up with the price breakout. #BTC #ETH #Bitcoin #Ethereum Chip giant directly assists clients in building leverage systems, $AVGO plans to raise over $60 billion through a special purpose vehicle to secure AI infrastructure orders.
Billion-dollar-level subordinated debt and guaranteed structures enter the computing power market, with large asset management institutions and chip suppliers' capital chains beginning to deeply intertwine.
Upstream hardware manufacturers expand credit to advance capital expenditures, maintaining order schedules while further concentrating technology sector capital positions toward the computing power supply chain.
This financing closed loop converts computing power demand into booked orders in advance, but during fluctuations in macro liquidity and inflation expectations, it also amplifies the credit sensitivity of the entire industry chain.
If the commercialization speed of end applications exceeds expectations, massive funds will smoothly convert into actual cash flow, driving the valuation center of computing power infrastructure higher, provided the liquidity environment does not tighten.
If end application monetization stalls, high leverage and massive guaranteed exposures may force rapid risk appetite compression, triggering concentrated position reductions and balance sheet revaluations.
Whether this round of capital bundling can continue depends on external capital's genuine willingness to take on subordinated computing power debt, which determines whether credit expansion can succeed.
Going forward, it is crucial to observe the final subscription progress of institutional participants to the SPV debt terms, as this is a key variable in assessing computing power credit risk pricing.
#美光加码AI存储，十年研发投入100亿美元 #BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？ #OpenAI二季度营收67亿美元，亏损扩大THE ETF BID DID NOT FADE ON FRIDAY
$BTC ETFs: +$307.5M
$ETH ETFs: +$184.0M
That closed a five-day run of:
BTC: +$1.918B
ETH: +$692.6M
Thursday's +$606.3M BTC print got the attention. Friday is the more useful data point. The flow did not vanish after the headline day.
Five consecutive positive sessions across both products is a meaningful change from the August outflow stretch.
But the distribution matters.
IBIT absorbed $1.331B during the BTC run, 69% of the total.
ETHA absorbed $536.8M during the ETH run, 77% of the total.
Together, two BlackRock products took in $1.87B of the $2.61B combined total.
The ETF bid is back. Broad participation is not proven yet.
The stronger confirmation next week is not another giant IBIT print. It is FBTC, BITB, ARKB and the non-ETHA ETH funds keeping flows positive when BlackRock cools.I used to make a very typical mistake:
Using news to guide trading.
Back when the ETH spot ETF was launched, I thought since the BTC ETF had nearly doubled, ETH as the runner-up should also rise once the ETF was implemented, right? What happened? I got liquidated directly. This made me completely understand that news explains the market but doesn’t necessarily predict it. $ETH
It’s the same now. BTC has surged from around 60,000 to nearly 80,000, and the market is frantically looking for reasons: US Treasury repo, gold rising, Trump supporting CLARITY... But what really ignited the market, I tend to see as a combination of policy expectations plus concentrated short covering, with funds rushing in a stampede.
More importantly, $BTC Bitcoin has reached the long-term resistance area near the daily EMA200. At this point, my first thought isn’t "what good news is there again," but how to manage the positions I hold after such a big rise.
I bought more $ZEC, a bit unable to control myself, seeing 1000 as the take profit!Samsung's pie, big and full
Samsung's 2026 shareholder return plan: 90 trillion to 110 trillion KRW, equivalent to 65 billion to 80 billion USD, the largest scale in South Korean corporate history.
Indeed big, indeed full. The numbers on the books are there, anyone who sees them has to nod.
But look closely: the actual buyback and cancellation—the action that can most directly boost the stock price—won't be confirmed until January 2027. What arrives this year is cash dividends, about 30 trillion KRW; the rest is all expectations and promises. After the plan was announced, the stock fell 4% in after-hours trading because the market wanted more than this.
SK Hynix directly threw out a 40 trillion KRW buyback + cancellation, buying back with real cash from the market and immediately burning it. Samsung's pie is drawn big, but the first bite still has to wait.
Samsung's pie, big and full, but what you can actually eat is not as much as imagined. 🫓
#三星股东回报落地，最高约800亿美元 如果昨天还在地板上躺平的币，今天突然跳起来涨了40%，那市场可能不是疯了，而是重新在给风险定价。 你有没有发现，昨天大家还在说"山寨要归零"，今天同一批人开始问"还能不能上车"？ 昨天那根大阴线砸下来的时候，情绪是真的差。BEAT这种做市商系的小币种直接被按在地上摩擦，看起来像要退市的样子。结果呢？今天直接反弹41%。XRP从1.31拉到1.59，离1.60就差一层窗户纸。DOGE、HYPE、OKB、HBAR全线飘红，连ETH都站回2510，SOL摸到96.9，BTC回到78332。 这不是分化，这是普涨。是市场在给昨天过度悲观的定价做修复。 我的理解是，昨天跌的不是基本面，是杠杆和恐慌。今天涨的也不是利好，是空头回补加上风险偏好的快速切换。资金没有离开，只是在等一个更低的位置，然后毫不犹豫地接回来。 这里要补一层大家可能忽略的东西：这轮反弹里，BEAT这种小票都涨了40%，说明资金的风险偏好正在从防御转向进攻。当小币种开始比主流涨得猛，往往意味着市场进入情绪修复的中后段，而不是刚启动。真正的启动期，大家还在犹豫，不会涨得这么整齐。 偏多的路径很清晰：如果BTC能站稳78000并放量突Just now, this waterfall drop, I temporarily don't think it's a sudden major negative news.
It feels more like the market calling back those chasing the rally to pay their tuition.
As of the time of checking, $BTC fell from a high near $79,500 to about $77,200, with an intraday low touching $76,400; $ETH dropped from around $2,542 back to near $2,430, losing the $2,500 support again.
Why the sudden dump?
First, BTC surged over 20% in a week, ETH rose about 30% in seven days, so short-term profit-taking positions have piled up too heavily.
Second, BTC failed to break through $80,000, and ETH couldn't firmly turn $2,500 into support.
Third, the latest single-day net inflow for BTC spot ETFs was about $68.2 million, significantly cooling down compared to $606.3 million the previous day.
Adding the thin liquidity over the weekend, a small amount of selling could trigger a chain stop-loss of highly leveraged long positions.
Currently, no definite sudden negative news has been found to explain the market-wide decline.
So my judgment is:
This is a high-level pullback plus leverage cleaning, but it can't be directly written off as the end of the bull market.
The harshest drops in a bull market are often not to end the trend but to weed out those who can't hold their positions.
If BTC holds $76,000–$76,400 and ETH holds $2,355–$2,400, there is still a chance for a quick rebound; if both break these levels simultaneously, the correction level may truly expand.
Do you think this wave is a healthy shakeout or the first warning of a top? I CALLED THE $BTC BITCOIN BOTTOM.
And I used the signal everyone feared.
Back on June 29, when the weekly death cross hit, everyone screamed crash.
I said the opposite.
The 50 week crossing below the 100 week has marked every major bottom, not the top.
Since that post, Bitcoin has done exactly what history said it would.
The scariest signal on the chart was the most bullish one all along.$BTC $ETH $TRUMP Every time Trump makes a crypto-friendly move, the market seems to pump first… then suddenly dumps. So, is this really “Trump cutting leeks”? Probably not that simple. 1. Good news can become the exit signal
Trump has repeatedly shown support for crypto, from industry-friendly policies to crypto-related events and legislation. But when the market has already priced those expectations in, the official announcement can become a classic “buy the rumor, sell the news” moment. 2. Wha#Remember a date: September 15, 2026
This is not a holiday, not a payday, but the life-or-death vote day for the future of the US crypto industry over the next decade.
At the beginning of the year, the market believed the CLARITY Act had an 82% chance of passing, basically a done deal, ensuring a stable bull market.
Now? Only 19.5%.
In just half a year, it went from "definitely passing" to "basically dead."
The fundamental reason for the bill being blocked is only one: Trump's $1.4 billion crypto conflict of interest.
In 2025, Trump's crypto income is $1.4 billion
TRUMP coin: $636 million
WLF financial project: nearly $800 million
Total annual income $2.2 billion, a 3.5x increase in one year, with all core growth coming from crypto. 69% of Americans and nearly half of Republicans believe: the president's private crypto interests are hijacking US policy. The Democrats are outright blocking: no vote in favor without adding ethics bans on public officials' crypto holdings.
They also publicly exposed five fatal loopholes in the bill:
Each one protects Trump’s continued crypto earnings with no real regulatory constraints.
Industry leaders bluntly say:
If this bill passes, Trump can earn another $1.4 billion.
This is the biggest hidden risk in this crypto cycle:
The current rally is betting on policy implementation.
But the real political landscape — the bill is very unlikely to pass.
September 15 will settle the dust.
Whether this crypto cycle reverses or crashes massively depends entirely on that day. Today it feels like funds in the crypto market are gradually moving from Bitcoin and Ethereum to mainstream altcoins.
Today, the old memes on Binance have basically all risen by about 20%, with pepe/doge/pengu/bome all taking off across the board.
Mainstream DeFi has also increased by more than 15%, with uni/aave/aster all performing quite well.
Including those currently at the top of the gainers list, almost all are old altcoins with strong momentum.
At this pace, it won't be long before the on-chain projects take off. If anyone thinks there are good buys, feel free to share in the comments! $BTC $500 billion AI financing plan: The next AI war begins to fight for "money"
The AI arms race has developed to the point where the bottleneck may no longer be just GPUs, HBM, and power.
There is a more practical question: where does the money come from?
NVIDIA $NVDA recently partnered with six financial giants—Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, and KKR—to establish an AI computing power financing platform, aiming to leverage over $500 billion in third-party capital specifically to support AI data centers and computing infrastructure construction.
Note, this is not NVIDIA spending $500 billion itself. It is more like turning AI computing power into an "infrastructure asset" that Wall Street can finance: tech companies handle demand, NVIDIA provides the GPU ecosystem, and financial institutions bring in long-term capital such as insurance, pensions, and private credit.
This makes me feel that AI has entered a new stage.
Especially now, with 30-year US Treasury yields still above 5%, financing costs are not low. If AI data centers really require trillions of dollars in investment in the future, what will determine how far this AI CAPEX can go may not just be technology, but whether these projects can ultimately generate enough cash flow to cover interest.
When GPUs start to be treated by Wall Street as financeable assets, the next AI war has already spread from chips to the capital markets.US Treasury borrowing to repurchase bonds finds no takers, is a bond market crash coming?
US Treasury yields continue to rise, unable to be suppressed. With mounting debt, traditional war-like debt reduction measures have minimal effect; is an interest rate cut imminent?
Last night, most of the US stock market gains were driven by base metals. The crisis has triggered panic across global capital markets. Is Bitcoin really a safe-haven asset? The Treasury borrows new debt to repay old debt—can it really hold down the 40 trillion?
This question is crucial for the mainstream market’s subsequent trend. On the surface, Bitcoin seems to have found a bottom and is moving up in sync with gold, but one factor must be considered: when a real crisis hits, what is the only thing that truly provides a sense of security? It’s not gold, not bonds, not cryptocurrencies, but cash. Institutions need to top up margin, funds face redemptions and need to return money—how will these cash gaps be filled? At high levels, only gold and Bitcoin can be sold, so this is why I say this is not a bull market rebound. Remember the 312 crash that halved prices.
The Treasury’s market rescue is a temporary fix, not a fundamental solution. US bonds can no longer fall back. Can tech stocks take over again? Will cyclical stocks and risk assets like BTC continue to spread?
Bitcoin may surge short-term, but if it cannot hold above 80000, it proves the market does not accept this measure at all. In the long term, $BTC BTC will still see a pullback. #黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战 There are not no crashes in a bull market; in fact, they are even more fierce!!!
Many people mistakenly believe that a bull market only goes up without falling. In reality, crashes in a bull market are often more brutal than in a bear market. Essentially, this is due to market overheating followed by concentrated liquidation of high leverage positions, which does not directly mean the end of the bull market.
During the big bull market on May 19, 2021, BTC quickly dropped from $58,000 to $38,600, with a single-day maximum drawdown exceeding 34%. Tens of billions in contract funds were liquidated, and the entire network was filled with voices claiming the bull market was over. After the shakeout, the market surged again, reaching a new all-time high of $69,000. At the same time, ETH plunged from $4,300 to $1,700, most altcoins were halved, and a large number of high-leverage accounts were completely wiped out.
In the 2024 bull market phase, $BTC spiked to $104,000 before instantly plunging to $91,000, causing billions in long position liquidations and hundreds of thousands of accounts to be liquidated. The price then quickly recovered and continued to rise, merely cleaning out short-term leveraged chips.
Sharp drops in a bull market are mostly driven by overheated on-exchange leverage, not a fundamental reversal. To judge whether the trend has ended, one must see if key weekly supports are effectively broken, whether institutional funds continue to flow out, and if long-term chips are collectively sold. Even in a bull market, it is crucial not to blindly hold high leverage positions; severe drawdowns can directly wipe out accounts.
This is only a market review and does not constitute any investment advice $BTC $ETH $DOGE #BTC延续强势，资金流能否持续？ #黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战 $BTC Short squeeze pulse hits triple headwinds: depreciation trades support price, but chasing longs is extremely poor value #BTC In short: This round = "fiscal/depreciation" macro narrative + 96% of shorts liquidated in a mechanical short squeeze overlay, price has deviated far from fundamental anchors. Facing triple headwinds — hawkish FOMC minutes + AI valuation warnings + spot selling bias (no US capital relay) + 1H volume contraction + options magnet below. Chasing longs is extremely poor vWatched $INTC all night, the underlying stock is closed over the weekend, but the token itself has already dropped more than four points. This market is weaker than I expected.
📰 News: Intel's recent stock issuance reportedly oversubscribed by over $100 billion, with the final scale possibly exceeding $20 billion, supply pressure is evident; Masayoshi Son holds 67% but didn't buy a single share last quarter, institutional confidence isn't as strong as they claim.
🔧 Technical: Daily RSI14 pressed down to 30.5, already weak; MACD death cross with expanding green bars; price has broken below MA7 and MA25; 7/25 moving averages are diverging bearish. I generally don't bet against this structure.
🌍 Macro: Nasdaq 100 tokens only fell 0.42% over the weekend, but INTC token dropped 4.61%, clearly underperforming the market. Thin liquidity during US market closure amplified sentiment.
🎯 Today's view: I'm bearish today. No signs of technical rebound, plus large issuance supply pressure from news. Token premium at -1.39% is not cheap; it's the token market preemptively discounting the stock's reopening price.
📊 Token 88.82 (-4.61%) | Stock 90.07 (-2.24%) | Premium -1.39% | US stock market closed over the weekend
#USStockTokens
#SemiconductorSector
#SOXLFutures Stopped cycles, what are the additional revaluation conditions that go beyond the already reflected meme value rankings of remaining options? The original text lists the market capitalizations of DOGE at $13 billion, SHIB at $3.7 billion, and BONK at $280 million, along with their respective survival histories of 4, 2, and 1 cycles, observing changes in the meme coin hierarchy. The key point here is not a simple market cap comparison, but that the number of survival cycles represents the 'persistence of verified capital.' DOGE has undergone multiple liquidity collapses and recoveries, forming fixed positions within certain capital tiers, while SHIB has confirmed this in one more risk appetite phase. BONK has yet to pass through a second cycle and remains unverified. This structure has important implications from the perspective of capital behavior. In phases where risk appetite contracts, capital retreats to verified liquidity pools (DOGE, SHIB), and in expansion phases, it moves to new narratives (BONK). In other words, the meme coin hierarchy acts as a gauge to measure the market's liquidity stages. At the current point, DOGE is#三星股东回报落地，最高约800亿美元
If the large-scale buyback by SK Hynix a few days ago was signaling to the market that "AI-generated profits are starting to be returned to shareholders," then Samsung has now taken this logic to a new level.
Samsung Electronics has officially approved its 2026 shareholder return plan, expected to reach 90 trillion to 110 trillion KRW, approximately $65 billion to $80 billion, setting a new record for South Korean companies. This scale is about five times Samsung's previous record set in 2020. (Samsung Global Newsroom)
One detail to note here:
This is not simply an "$80 billion stock buyback."
The entire plan includes cash dividends, stock buybacks, and cancellations among other methods. Samsung plans to distribute about 30 trillion KRW in cash dividends in Q3, with the remaining amount to be finalized in January 2027 based on full-year performance; meanwhile, the board has approved about 15 trillion KRW for stock buybacks related to employee compensation. (Samsung Global Newsroom)
But rather than focusing on the specific methods, I am more interested in why Samsung dares to offer such a massive shareholder return at this point in time.
The answer still comes back to the cash flow generated by AI.
Demand for HBM, DRAM, and the entire AI data center supply chain has transformed the storage industry from a typically cyclical sector into one with exceptionally strong profits and cash flow. Samsung has previously committed to using 50% of its cumulative free cash flow from 2024 to 2026 for shareholder returns, and now it is effectively starting to realize the profits generated by this AI cycle for shareholders. (Samsung es)
What’s even more interesting is that Samsung is not an isolated case.
SK Hynix just announced a 40 trillion KRW stock buyback and cancellation plan this week, followed immediately by Samsung’s announcement of up to 110 trillion KRW in shareholder returns. (WSAU)
Therefore, I believe a significant valuation logic shift is occurring in the South Korean semiconductor sector:
In the past, the market bought Samsung and Hynix mainly betting on rising memory prices → profit growth → valuation recovery.
But if the high profits brought by AI can be sustained, and companies start continuously returning cash to shareholders through dividends + buybacks + cancellations, then the market is no longer just trading a memory cycle, but rather:
Profit growth + free cash flow growth + share capital contraction + increased shareholder returns.
The combination of these four factors is what can truly change the long-term valuation baseline.
Of course, the biggest risk now is very clear—the market has already started pricing memory companies based on the "AI supercycle" logic.
If future AI capital expenditures slow down, or if HBM supply and demand shift back to oversupply, then the currently abundant free cash flow could also rapidly decline.
So the real question going forward is no longer:
Can Samsung come up with $80 billion?
But rather:
Does Samsung and SK Hynix’s willingness to return cash on such a large scale now mean that management believes this AI memory cycle will last longer than the market expects?
If the answer is yes, then this semiconductor rally may be far from simply a "cycle peak."#黄金突破4600美元，债券避险地位受挑战
Gold breaks through $4600, bond safe-haven status challenged
Gold has once again broken through $4600, but what truly deserves attention in this rally is not the gold price itself, but the market's redefinition of what constitutes a “safe-haven asset.”
As of the latest trading, spot gold rose to about $4636/oz, up approximately 4.5% for the week. The direct catalyst for this rally was the U.S. Treasury's announcement to expand long-term Treasury repurchase operations, aiming to ease pressure on long-term yields. After the announcement, U.S. Treasury yields fell, the dollar weakened, and gold quickly attracted capital. (The Wall Street Journal)
But here lies an interesting contradiction:
In the past, when market risks emerged, capital often flowed simultaneously into the dollar, U.S. Treasuries, and gold; now, a different structure is emerging—the risks the market worries about actually stem from the U.S. fiscal and debt system itself.
This means that when investors worry about U.S. debt levels, fiscal deficits, and long-term financing costs, U.S. Treasuries can no longer serve as an absolute safe-haven as they once did. The Treasury's expansion of long-term Treasury repurchase operations can temporarily improve liquidity and suppress yields, but on the other hand, this active intervention prompts the market to rethink: why do long-term bonds need policy support to stabilize?
Currently, the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield remains above 4.6%, and the 30-year yield has once again surpassed 5%, indicating that the bond market's real concerns about long-term fiscal issues have not disappeared. (Investopedia)
Therefore, I believe the most important logic behind this gold rally is actually a repricing between credit assets and non-credit assets.
Gold pays no interest and generates no cash flow, but its greatest feature is that it corresponds to no one's liability. U.S. Treasuries are completely different; they are fundamentally based on the U.S. government's future debt repayment ability and the credit of the dollar.
When the market's concern shifts from ordinary economic recession to debt expansion, monetary purchasing power, and fiscal sustainability, gold's “no yield” actually becomes an advantage.
This also explains a very noteworthy recent phenomenon:
Gold and BTC are rising simultaneously, while the dollar is under pressure.
These two assets have completely different natures but are trading on the same underlying logic—the market is starting to price in “currency depreciation” and fiscal risk. (Financial Times)
Of course, this does not mean U.S. Treasuries will lose their status as the world's core safe-haven asset. The depth, liquidity, and global reserve attributes of the dollar system remain difficult to replace.
But at least this rally tells us:
When risks come from within the financial system, bonds may no longer be the best safe harbor.
Next, I will focus on whether gold can hold above $4600 and whether long-term U.S. Treasury yields can truly fall. If gold continues to rise while the 30-year yield remains high, it may mean the market is trading not just rate cuts but a deeper U.S. fiscal credit premium.
What do you think will truly compete with U.S. Treasuries for the status of “global safe-haven asset” in the future—gold or BTC? #BTC continues its strength, can the capital flow sustain?
This round of BTC's rise is no longer just an ordinary technical rebound.
In the past week, Bitcoin quickly surged from around $60,000, once approaching $80,000, with a weekly increase of over 20%. What’s more noteworthy is that this rise was accompanied by a clear coordination of spot capital: from Monday to Thursday this week, the US spot BTC ETF saw a cumulative net inflow of about $1.6 billion, with Thursday alone reaching about $606 million, marking the highest single-day inflow since May. (The Wall Street Journal)
So now, when I judge BTC’s strength or weakness, I don’t put price first; instead, I first look at whether the capital flow can keep up with the price.
Because short-term rises can be driven by short covering and sentiment, but to truly turn a rebound into a trend, there must be continuous new capital support. Now that BTC can continuously break through previous resistance and ETF funds are accelerating inflows again, this is one of the biggest differences between this rally and previous weak rebounds.
But there is also a point to be cautious about:
The price has already started to trade ahead of expectations for improved liquidity.
After the US Treasury expanded long-term bond repos, the dollar came under clear pressure, and BTC and gold simultaneously became beneficiaries of this "currency depreciation trade"; meanwhile, improved regulatory expectations and short covering further amplified the upward slope. In other words, BTC’s rise now is not driven by a single logic but by the resonance of ETF funds + dollar weakness + liquidity expectations + short squeeze simultaneously. (Financial Times)
Once this resonance forms, the trend is often stronger than imagined; but the problem is exactly here—when multiple positives are priced in simultaneously, the market’s demand for subsequent capital inflows becomes increasingly high.
What I’m most focused on next is not whether BTC can instantly break through $80,000, but two signals:
First, whether ETF net inflows can continue to hold at a high level.
Second, whether spot buying will continue to support BTC on pullbacks after a breakout.
If capital continues to flow in, then pullbacks are more likely just rotations within a strong trend; but if the price keeps hitting new highs while ETF funds start to decline, beware of a divergence between price and capital flow.
So the real question now is not:
"How much more can BTC rise?"
But rather:
"Who is still buying, and how long can they keep buying?"
The trend has already strengthened, but what ultimately determines the height of this rally is the real capital continuously entering the market.
Do you think this BTC rally has entered a new trend, or is it just a large rebound driven by liquidity? $BTC $SPCX SPCX 135.62, Starship completed a 60-second static fire test. A technical breakthrough of this level half a year ago might have triggered a big bullish candle. But today SPCX barely moved, dropping from 137 to 135. When good news comes but the price doesn't rise, it indicates the core issue for this asset right now isn't "technical progress" but rather "unlocking expectations." 😅
SAR=136.54 overhead, EMA21=137.25, EMA55=137.83, all three lines are above the price, forming a resistance zone. RSI6=41.07, neither high nor low; KDJ's J value=82.05, K=69.43, D=63.13, just formed a golden cross—but the price is being suppressed by the moving averages, so the effectiveness of this golden cross is questionable. BOLL middle band at 137.10, upper band 142.69, lower band 131.50, price is near the lower band, indicating short-term rebound demand, but the rebound space is limited by the middle band and moving average resistance.
The successful Starship static fire test shows SpaceX's technical progress is still advancing as planned. But the price of the SPCX contract has been weighed down by "unlocking expectations" for too long—no matter what news comes out, as long as the shadow of unlocking remains, the price will struggle to truly strengthen.
Comment below, do you think SPCX can hold 130? Or will it break below the lower band and continue downward? My account is still short, but I'm curious about your views. 🫡
Technical breakthroughs are real breakthroughs, but contract structure is another matter. SpaceX's fundamentals are solid, but SPCX's contract structure has unlocking issues. When fundamentals and contract structure conflict, the market usually resolves the contract structure issue first before considering fundamentals. If you disagree, bring it on, show your trades. 😅