Orbit Post Sitemap

$ZAMA pulled back about 10% today along with the broader market, trading at $0.08, but this is a normal consolidation after hitting the all-time high of $0.107 on 9/23 — still up +62% over 30 days and +172% over 90 days, with a market cap around $200 million. It is the absolute leader in the fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) privacy sector, with the deepest technical barriers. Today's drop was a market sentiment overreaction, not a fundamental change; the pullback is actually a buying opportunity. Four bullish points: ① Major acquisition just completed: Announced yesterday the acquisition of Kakarot, a top ZK team endorsed by Vitalik and StarkWare, aiming to boost confidential transaction throughput to 10,000 TPS, fully ramping up the scaling narrative. ② Most practical institutional adoption: Confidential RFQ allows institutions to trade on-chain without revealing position directions; Morpho confidential vault and shielded USDT trading volume exceeded $131 million, proving privacy DeFi is operational. ③ Explosive channel growth: Launched on Revolut reaching 70 million users, and on 9/24 also launched on Solana (Raydium trading), native Ethereum and cross-BNB, multi-chain volume expansion. ④ Scarce sector positioning: FHE enables computation directly on encrypted data, balancing privacy and verifiability, and supports encrypted AI inference, making it the purest privacy+AI dual narrative play. Key levels: Support: $0.08 (critical) → $0.065 → $0.05 Resistance: $0.095 → $0.107 (ATH) → $0.15 BTC has been running a pullback since 87395, with the Gann angle line 2/1 serving as the critical dividing line between strength and weakness. Since we proposed July 1 as a phase low point in our June video, BTC has risen 51.2% from 57800. On September 24, we managed altcoin contract long positions and previously chased high-cost spot longs, additionally opening shorts on BTC and ETH. The shorts were closed yesterday with profits not very high, considered a short-term swing. The observation point below remains at 2/1 (79900-80300). Whether this level can act as support directly determines if the decline since 87395 is a pullback targeting the red segment or the entire black segment. The expected end time for the pullback is early October to early November, at which point the specific structure will be used to judge if the pullback has ended. I have said more than once that BTC's trend is certain, but this view may be increasingly questioned over time. I would not be surprised by that. Those who can capture the next wave exceeding the 57800-87395 rise are destined to be few; the 80/20 rule always applies. Is a 2x leveraged long ETF suitable for long-term holding? For those who can't do the math, it's a huge trap 🤔🤑 Many who bought 2x leveraged long Hynix or 2x leveraged long SpaceX got stuck and then planned to hold long-term, but found that the longer the time, the less money was in the account. Maybe in the end the stock price roughly recovered, but the 2x leveraged long ETF had already lost 40%. How is the math done? Suppose I have 20,000 yuan, 10,000 yuan to buy a stock, and 10,000 yuan to buy its 2x leveraged long ETF. On day one, the stock price dropped 20%, the stock account had 8,000 left, the ETF dropped 40%, leaving 6,000, I got a bit nervous. On day two, the stock price rose 25%, the stock account returned to 10,000, the ETF rose 50%, becoming 9,000, I breathed a sigh of relief, then realized I was down 1,000. In the next eight trading days, the stock price went back and forth like this four times, each time returning to the original price. The stock account was still 10,000, but the ETF account became 5,905. The problem is that after dropping, the ETF rising 50% is 50% of 6,000; the stock price returned to the original point, but the ETF did not. It multiplies the daily price change by 2 every day; the more back and forth, the more the principal is eroded. For example, from early last year to early November, MicroStrategy only dropped 12%, but its 2x leveraged long MSTU dropped over 65%, and its 2x leveraged short MSTZ also dropped over 65%. $BTC SNDK opened on Monday dropping directly from 1779 to 1704, the 1770 it hovered around over the weekend quickly disappeared. Yesterday's low was 1766, the high was 1781, and it closed at 1779. Today it opened near 1779, reached a high of 1786, a low of 1704, and the current price is about 1717. Volume increased from 120,000 to 630,000, indicating selling pressure downward. Resistance remains between 1779 and 1814, with 1906 above that. If 1704 breaks again on the downside, it’s likely to see lower levels first; if this support also fails, the short term could move down to 1618 to find space. In the short term, watch if the current price around 1717 can hold. If it doesn’t hold, consider it as an acceleration of the drop from 1906 being digested, and don’t chase at this price. For those already holding, watch if the low of 1704 today can hold; if it can’t, consider reducing positions. For those looking to buy, wait for a pullback and reconsider if it can break through 1779, don’t catch a falling knife mid-air. $SNDK Bitcoin is currently fluctuating around $83,000, and in the short term, remains in a corrective phase after a pullback from the previous high of $87K. 📌 1D Technical Structure • Previously rebounded from around $75,200 • Then surged to around $87,300 before pullback • SAR remains below the price, trend has not fully weakened 🎯 🟢 Key Position • Resistance: $84,900 → $87,300 • Support: $82,300 → $79,800 • If it rebounds above $85K, the market may retest previous high areas • If $82K is breached, short-term correction room may expand 📈 further Range Performance • 7D: approx. -4.1% • 30D: approx. +5.4% • 90D: approx. +40.7% • 180D: approx. +21.2% There 📰 are macro data catalysts this week. The US market is set to see PCE inflation, ISM manufacturing, and Friday's nonfarm payroll data. The market may reprice interest rate paths based on the data, so BTC's short-term volatility is worth watching. What is more worth watching now is whether it can hold near $82K. If it holds, there is still room for a rebound; If it falls below $80K further, the technical correction may continue downward. 💬 Are you more focused on the 82K support, or are you waiting for BTC to climb back above 85K? #BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #PCE #NFP #BitcoinUpdXAU opened on Monday and dropped directly from 4280 to 4151, tearing apart the range that had been consolidating for two days over the weekend. Yesterday's low was 4278, the high was 4282, and it closed at 4280. Today it opened near 4280, the high remained at 4282 without moving, the low was 4151, and the current price is about 4158. Volume expanded from 1.58 million to 14.73 million, indicating a volume-driven decline. Resistance remains between 4280 and 4311 above; further up is 4369 to 4429. If 4151 breaks again below, it is likely to see lower levels first; if this support also fails, the short term may look for space near 4100. In the short term, watch if the current price around 4158 can hold. If it doesn't hold, consider it as accelerating digestion from the drop starting at 4429, and avoid chasing at this price. For those already holding, watch if the low at 4151 today can hold; if not, consider reducing positions. For those looking to buy, wait for a pullback and reconsider if it can't break through 4280; don't catch a falling knife in midair. $XAU Spot prices haven't moved much, but contract accounts can be completely flipped upside down Watching $ETH the same way, some think the market is flat, while others have already experienced a round of forced liquidation. The difference often lies not in directional judgment, but in position structure. Around 11:00 on September 27, the ETH price on the OKX page was about $2698; for spot, this is just a quote, but for high-leverage accounts, it simultaneously affects margin, funding rates, and liquidation distance. Long-term views address why one is willing to hold, leverage cannot solve this question. Using the protocol development of the next two years to explain today's tens of dollars of inverse volatility is like mixing two completely different time scales. Even if the direction guess is correct in the end, it cannot undo the forced liquidations that have already occurred along the way. There are many aspects of Ethereum worth studying: settlement demand, collateral use, staking security, developer ecosystem. Contract positions, however, will not wait for these to slowly materialize. The larger the position, the easier it is for a retracement that could be tolerated to become a crisis that must be answered immediately; at this point, people start looking for news that supports their position and ignore the changed market conditions. I don't think holding spot is inherently correct, nor do I believe contracts should never be touched. The key is not to package these two participation methods into the same belief. If you are willing to bear long-term price fluctuations, leave time and cash buffers; if you participate in short-term trading, first clearly define the failure conditions. Being bullish on $ETH is not about forcing yourself into a corner with no way out, but about retaining the ability to continue making judgments.After being immersed in trading for a long time, you begin to truly understand the fundamental differences between trading and everyday life, grasping and accepting the uncertainty of outcomes and timing, and gradually letting go of obsession with results. You start to realize that immediately placing an order to recover losses after a mistake is an instinct formed through the long process of human evolution. Frequent trading, like losing weight or quitting smoking, requires fighting against inertia and hormonal mechanisms—be patient with yourself. You begin to cultivate the ability to let go of various distractions and return to the essence of trading. Simply put, it means making rational decisions, managing risk, and executing well; profits are just a byproduct. Therefore, the important thing is to have the ability to stay at the table.Welcome to the double drop moment $BTC $XAUT Gold has fallen to $4144, so why did the safe-haven logic suddenly fail? Today's drop in gold is actually quite interesting. Spot gold once fell to around $4144, with an intraday drop of over 3%, while oil prices actually strengthened again. On the surface, it looks like gold is falling, but behind it, another trend is being traded: rising oil prices → renewed inflation pressure → Fed's rate cut space compressed → stronger dollar and US Treasury yields → pressure on gold as a non-yielding asset. What is most noteworthy is that the Middle East situation still carries uncertainty. According to past logic, gold should have safe-haven demand, but this time funds clearly care more about "whether high oil prices will push inflation up again." This is also why the recent performance of gold and BTC is worth watching together. Gold falling does not necessarily mean funds have completely left safe-haven assets; it is more likely that the market is starting to reprice "high interest rates." For the crypto space, this is actually a signal to be cautious: if upcoming US employment and inflation data continue to be strong, US Treasury yields will rise further, and BTC will also face liquidity pressure. In the short term, I won't directly turn bearish on BTC just because gold is falling, but I will closely watch the dollar, US Treasury yields, and BTC's own trading volume. The key for gold now is not the number 4144 itself, but whether this round of decline is an emotional sell-off or a change in the macro interest rate logic. If it is the latter, what we really need to guard against next may not be how much gold continues to fall, but the entire risk asset valuation being repriced together Recently, several assets have shown a common trait: after a rapid rally, they have all entered a phase of high-level consolidation. Compared to continuing to chase the rally, what is more important to watch next is whether the key support is effective. $SOL: $120 becomes the short-term dividing line between bulls and bears. SOL previously surged to about $124.8 before pulling back, and is currently fluctuating repeatedly around $119–$121. If it can hold around $120, market sentiment is likely to gradually recover, with a renewed challenge between $123–$126; However, if volume drops below this range, short-term profit-taking may be further released, with the next observation area set at $116–$118. A sideways movement after consecutive gains does not necessarily mean the trend is over; what really needs to be confirmed is whether buying remains during the pullback. $SPCX: Support near $148 is being tested. SPCX has pulled back from around $154.8 and is currently hovering in the $148–$149 range. Below, focus on support at $147–$148, while $151–$155 remains a clear resistance zone. If no subsequent volume supports a breakout, the current trend is more toward high-level consolidation rather than the initiation of a new trend. $NVDA: High-level volatility, with both fundamentals and valuation pressure. NVDA closed around $225 last week, up about 19% year-to-date. AI computing power and data center demand remain the core logic of the market, but after previous gains, stock prices have entered a phase where they need to digest gains. In other words, fundamentals are not strongBNB: After rising 20%, it stands at the critical 38.2% level Let's start with the 4-hour chart. This wave rose cleanly from 674.7 on September 2 to 807.7 on September 21, an increase of 19.7%, with almost no significant pullbacks. It has now retraced to 762, exactly at the 38.2% retracement level of 756.9 — this position is very critical. If it holds, the upward structure remains; if it doesn't, the next supports are the 50% level at 741 and the 61.8% level at 725. Looking at the 1-hour chart, the details are clearer. After the high of 807.7, the price oscillated downward with a continuously lowering center of gravity. The 785 level rebounded three times but failed to break through, becoming a short-term ceiling. Today's large bearish candle hit 756.7, which is exactly the previous retracement low and also the 4-hour 38.2% confluence level, with a late session close barely recovering to 762. Combining both timeframes: the larger timeframe is still in a bullish structure, but the smaller timeframe has weakened. The small range between 762-756 is now the dividing line between bulls and bears. Holding above 756, the next focus is whether 785 can be broken; only after that is there a chance to test 800. If 756 is lost, the 741-725 area will provide meaningful support. In short: the bullish trend is intact, but don't chase the highs. Wait for a stabilization signal at the support level before considering entry. All supports today are invalid for hype Orders placed according to the rules on ondo all got stopped out. Therefore, we still need to look at the overall market trend from the 4-hour chart perspective of the main market BTC and ETH, as this directly relates to how the altcoin whales are thinking. No main force pulling near can fail to follow the trend and pull up when the main market is moving up simultaneously... So, stop here and build a position in BTC to replace all altcoins. If stuck, just wait to be unstuck. Time will prove me right.OKX has so many principal-protected financial activities, either flash profits or lite. This operational approach is correct; attracting users' funds can bring possible trading fees. Tomorrow I plan to transfer Ethereum from Binance to OKX. This time the prize pool is 400,000 USDT. OKX is generous, offering a discount equivalent to 2.8 million RMB, like a house. It's not easy for me either, fussing back and forth for a little financial interest. I'll keep going since the earnings are in dollars, which is quite worthwhile.$CORE $CORE Watching CORE's weak rise yesterday, it is expected to decline gradually in the coming days. Decisively shorting it, this is just worthless mud, completely hopeless, especially since it is already full of holes! Every day it just uses narratives to scare those trapped at high positions so they dare not sell, while quietly selling off itself. The 150 million tokens burned have no substantial evidence to back them up, ending simply with "no need to trust"! Not to mention the 69 million ghost tokens in circulation, most of the community believes the project team is deceiving themselves because two new nodes were just added recently, followed by an issuance of nearly 300 million tokens. How coincidental is that? Poor loyal fans who rushed in to buy have once again been trapped at the peak! I've said it before, CORE has no bottom, only a peak or mid-mountain!ALGO surged into trending searches, with OI increasing 36.11% compared to the previous record   $ALGO is currently at 0.128, up 8.1% in 24h, and has entered CoinGecko's trending searches — I'm directly bullish, with pullbacks as buying opportunities.   First, the capital. 24h trading volume is 10,116,788 USDT, volume ratio 3.123, showing strong volume; OI is 101,077,716.50, 36.11% higher than the September 13 record, funding rate 0.0001, longs are not crowded.   Second, the structure. Daily RSI at 69.5 is relatively strong, MACD golden cross above zero line with 8 days of expanding red bars, MA7 above MA30 in a bullish alignment, current price above the upper Bollinger Band.   Third, don’t get carried away. Only 16 out of 75 coins in the entire market are rising, median change is -5.136%, BTC at 82,809.36 is below MA7, indicating a high-level divergence pullback phase, ALGO is a strong coin moving against the trend, not a general market rally.   Resistance above: 0.1293 (24h high)   Support below: 0.1213 (4h SAR)   Bullish stance unchanged, enter near 0.128, stop loss if it breaks below 0.1213; if it holds, first target 0.1293, add positions on a volume breakout. Fear and greed index at 74, 30-day range at 0.961, position is not cheap, manage your position size accordingly.   Like and follow, I’ll alert you first on the next trending coin.   $ALGO $BTCSigh, almost couldn't hold on. Luckily, I got out with a 2u profit when it briefly turned green halfway through, then re-entered at a lower position. Otherwise, I would have already been liquidated. Entered at 9.85 to add to the position, kept adding until the average price was 9.374. This is just ridiculous. It was clearly a big drop, but the fee rate was still positive, shouldn't it be negative? It's really bullying the long positions. Now it turned green again, I'll take a 10-dollar profit and exit. Later on c2c, I don't even know how the US stock market opening will crash. It might just trigger liquidation. To all the long position friends, just in case, don't add more now. Wait until the US stock market opens and stabilizes before adding again. Who knows, if BTC breaks 80,000 later, other coins will collectively crash. The real signal of Bitcoin: it's not the price, but the flow of funds Price fluctuations are just the surface. What really matters is the direction of capital flow. A recent clear signal: the US Bitcoin spot ETF has seen net inflows for 7 consecutive trading days, totaling nearly $3 billion, setting a new single-week high this year. This is not short-term speculation driven by retail sentiment, but institutional funds continuously and orderly building positions. A more critical change is on-chain: Bitcoin is moving from exchange hot wallets to fund custody accounts. Chips are shifting—from short-term traders to long-term holders. Institutions buying Bitcoin are not betting on tomorrow’s price ups and downs. They treat it as an alternative asset, making allocations, not speculations. So when the price falls back, the downside is not a vacuum; funds are absorbing it. But be clear: Institutional entry ≠ immediate start of a bull market. They are not short-term players and won’t rush in just because of a single bullish candle. Plus, US Treasury yields remain attractive, and cash yields returns even when idle, so funds won’t all flood into the crypto market. Bitcoin remains the anchor of the entire market. Watching it means not only looking at price changes but also at who is accumulating the chips. Prices will fluctuate, but don’t let volatility make your decisions for you. $BTC $ETH $SOL #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 #财报观察员：美光财报临近，AI存储需求成焦点 #美伊继续磋商霍尔木兹开放条件 ETH Evening Core Logic · Qualitative: Stronger than BTC, but don't get overconfident; whether it can truly hold depends on if it can stand back up. · Key Support: Temporarily held at 2635 on the hourly level. To rebound, it must first return to the descending trendline, then stand above 2703; if it can't surpass 2703, don't expect resistance above. Staying sideways between these two without falling is already good. · Breakdown Path: If 2635 breaks, first watch around 2567; don't rush to buy the dip, first see if 2567 is a false breakdown and recovers, wait for signals. · Long Conditions: ① Stand above 2703, then enter again if it retests without breaking 2703; ② Bottom signals near 2635 to enter again. Don't randomly go long or short now, both sides are tough. · Short-term Right Side: Break above 2655 with volume to chase longs, break below 2641 with volume to chase shorts. If volume is off, don't move, set stop losses properly. · Hourly steady above 2655, target 2703-2744; 4-hour break below 2641, target 2610-2586. · 4-hour Warning: Has dropped below 2670. If it can't recover 2670, the M-top pattern likely forms, target near 2520, with a quick spike down. Only a return above 2670 can trigger a rebound; failure means a slow decline. BTC Evening Core Logic · Qualitative: The downtrend is not over yet, hold off on bottom fishing, don't get excited and buy at the peak. · Structure: Highs and lows continue to be pushed down, lows haven't risen, no stabilization pattern yet. The 87299-83229 range has been broken, 83229 has turned from floor to resistance. Only recovering above 83229 can temporarily stop the bleeding; to have a decent rebound, it needs to take... In March 2026, a trader identified a classic "head and shoulders bottom" pattern on the 4-hour Bitcoin chart. After the neckline breakout, he decisively entered a long position, setting a stop loss just below the right shoulder. Three hours later, Bitcoin precisely dropped below the right shoulder low, triggering the stop loss, then reversed and rose 8%. The stop loss position was exactly at the tip of that long lower shadow wick. This is no coincidence. This is part of the market makers' daily routine. Why technical indicators fail The premise of technical analysis is: history repeats, price action reflects all information, and market participants are rational and dispersed. None of these three assumptions hold true in today's crypto market. The first problem: market participants are no longer dispersed. In 2026, institutions accounted for 72% of spot trading volume on crypto OTC platforms, and IBIT alone accounted for 52% of Bitcoin options market volume. When a few market makers simultaneously control liquidity, options positions, and order book depth, the "market" is no longer a collection of dispersed decisions but an environment actively shaped by a few participants. The second problem: price action no longer reflects "all information." ETF channel buying can enter the market with minimal on-chain data impact, CME futures dominate price discovery far more than offshore spot, and options Gamma exposure defines short-term volatility boundaries. The prices retail traders see on charts are already the result of market makers' hedging, basis trading, and options positions combined. The third problem: history does repeat, but it repeats in the way market makers want it to repeat. When enough🚀 We are launching Flash Earn Lite with USDT (Tether) | Sep 29 - Oct 4, 2026 Pre-subscription Opens: Sep 28, 2026, 10:00 UTC Campaign Period: Sep 29 - Oct 4, 2026, 07:00 UTC Total Rewards: 400,000 USDT in airdrop rewards Subscription Pool: • ETH pool - 400,000 USDT • Minimum subscription: 0.01 ETH • Estimated APR: approximately 10%* Learn More: https://www.okx.com/help/okx-flash-earn-lite-usdt-is-now-live-subscribe-eth-to-share-400-000-usdt Join Now: https://okx.com/ul/m6WLXT *The estimated APR is for reference only and may fluctuate.Why does black U persist despite repeated bans? How can ordinary people avoid receiving black U? In the crypto world, USDT is the most commonly used stablecoin, but the term "black U" also causes headaches for many. So-called black U refers to USDT whose funds come from illegal activities such as fraud, hacking, or money laundering. If you accidentally receive it, your account can be frozen at best, your funds lost to zero, or even legal trouble. Why has black U been circulating? First, money laundering networks have become industrialized. Using platforms like Telegram as bases, a mature "collateral transaction" ecosystem has formed, with dedicated intermediaries, benchmarking networks, and off-exchange counters. According to the Chainalysis report, in 2025, Chinese money laundering networks processed about $16 billion in illegal crypto assets, with "black U" services publicly selling polluted assets at 70–80% of market price. Second, there are cross-border challenges in law enforcement. Different countries have varying laws, poor information sharing, and limited on-chain tracking capabilities, creating a low-risk environment for criminals. Even if some platforms are targeted, suppliers can quickly move to other channels, with minimal impact. Third, exploiting human weaknesses. Black U is usually lured by offering 10% to 20% below market price to attract buyers seeking lower prices. Many people, knowing the risks, still take chances and take over, creating an outlet for circulation. How can ordinary people avoid receiving black U? First, prioritize C2C channels with compliant firms. Trading in the official C2C zones of leading exchanges like Binance and OKX is the most controllable risk. Exchanges hold sellers' U and enter the seller's account$BTC plunged 2%, institutions are aggressively buying but creating a trap? Traders bluntly say: Don't panic, this is a fake drop! Brothers, eyes were red watching the market this morning. BTC is currently around $82,800, down over 2% in 24 hours, the intraday high near $85,000 was directly smashed through, and the low hit around $82,700. Trading volume is still holding strong above 30B. #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 Last week, spot ETF net inflows were $2.39 billion, the strongest week of 2026 so far. Institutions are clearly accumulating aggressively, but the price dropped first as a sign of respect. US Treasury yields soared to highs, macro pressure is real, but the key technical support at 82k remains intact, and the trendline is unbroken. @OKX中文 @OKX星球 Guys, I just woke up, my mind still a bit groggy. I kept staring at this $BTC short position last night, almost staying up all night. I held out until noon and couldn't hold on anymore, so I fell straight asleep. The first thing I did upon waking was check the market on my phone—BTC hit a low near $82,606 and is still around $82,700, down more than 2% in 24 hours. Seeing this price, I breathed a long sigh of relief: the short positions weren't wiped out! Not only did I survive the intense midnight volatility, but as the price dropped below 83,000 → 82,800, some floating profits have started to appear. Sleeping through this feels like I dodged a disaster. But calming down, I still feel a chill down my back...... What if last night hadn't been a further downward probe, but instead of a sudden upward spike? If during the hours I was asleep, the main force suddenly pulled up the market and made a special short squeeze, then what I woke up to might not be floating gains but a blowout warning. The short-term market remains weak now, with 1-minute moving averages continuing downward, and bears temporarily holding the initiative. But here's the problem: KDJ has entered a low-level dulling zone, and the risk of short-term oversold rebounds is increasing. So I don't dare blindly chase shorts. The 82,600 area has become an important observation zone. If it fails to break below here for a long time, the market may repeatedly test it, possibly even trigger a quick rebound before deciding on the next direction. Also, today's macro environment is not very friendly. The latest news shows that the US and Iran are trading around HuoOn the eve of CPI, ETH is waiting for a liquidation $ETH is tugging back and forth around 2650, with both bulls and bears waiting for Wednesday's CPI. Positive factors are abundant: spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $690 million last week, Vitalik updated the long-term roadmap, ARK is moving asset tokenization onto Ethereum, and community sentiment is bullish. But risks are real: a three-year-old whale transferred $300 million ETH to exchanges, on-chain activity is sluggish, options volatility is rising, and the funding model is biased toward outflows. The liquidation map is more direct. Below, 2503 holds a large number of long positions, closer to the current price; above, 2918 has dense short positions but is farther away. If CPI misses expectations, ETH will dip, and the 2503 area is prone to triggering a chain of long liquidations, first pressuring longs. If CPI exceeds expectations and breaks through 2918, then shorts will be squeezed. My view: pressing longs first is more likely, not because the direction is bearish, but because the liquidation zone below is closer and the cost of a spike is lower. However, 2630–2560 could be a meat grinder zone; after longs are liquidated, liquidity will sharply drop, making a sudden rally easier. CPI is just the fuse; the real outcome depends on the price reaction after liquidation. Killing longs first doesn’t necessarily mean the bulls lose; squeezing shorts first doesn’t necessarily mean the bears die. We’ll see the verdict on Wednesday. #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 #财报观察员：美光财报临近，AI存储需求成焦点 The most dangerous signal has appeared on the chessboard: when the pawn chain on the king's wing freezes in place, the real killing move is never on the main battlefield. Bitcoin and Ethereum are like two heavy pieces locked in a stalemate, moving sideways, gathering strength, and restraining each other, while ZEC, a forgotten light piece for many years, suddenly completed a textbook promotion on the flank. $1,697 — this is not a random fluctuation, but the realization of a long dormant piece — all the players who treated ZEC as a dead piece and abandoned it over the past four years are now gritting their teeth during review. Having played chess for thirty years, I know one thing clearly: the market always rewards those who are willing to keep an active bishop in the endgame. While mainstream funds repeatedly make meaningless pawn pushes in the closed positions of BTC/ETH, ZEC has carved out a completely independent path. This divergence is not noise; it is structural — like a tactical combination in the middlegame suddenly tearing apart what seemed like a solid pawn structure. Now look at its support system. 21Shares has made a move in Europe, Grayscale’s ZCSH high-yield ETF has been submitted to regulators, though not yet approved, this is called a “positional threat” — the game is not over, but the opponent must already split forces to defend. True grandmasters don’t look at what piece was captured in this move; they watch how the opponent is forced to respond in the next five moves. The NU7 testnet on October 6 and mainnet launch on November 5 are key squares on the timeline; any delay will be seen by bears as a window for counterattack. But I want to point out a tactical detail everyone overlooks: this round of ZEC’s rally happened against the backdrop of overall market sentiment contraction. This is called a “lone soldier breakthrough in a closed position” — it can promote because all other lines are frozen. Once BTC restarts and liquidity returns, this lone soldier will face the risk of being surrounded and captured. Before promotion is opportunity; after promotion is responsibility. As for the linkage with US stock targets, that is a reflection of another chessboard. When traditional capital begins to seek “low-priced active pieces” in the crypto sector, targets like XASTS become the channel. This is not simple correlation; it is capital performing a cross-board castling, moving risk from one square to another. In my career, I have won many games, never by chasing rises and falls, but by seeing this endgame shape before the twentieth move. The position ZEC is in now is a good move, but between a good move and a winning move lies the patience of an entire middlegame. The lone soldier has already reached the seventh rank. The next step, promotion or capture, depends on the hand playing black. #ZECNears1700NewHigh Today's comment Q: When choosing long-term targets, do you value income, business model, or valuation the most? Valuation. I know many people say the business model is the root, and income is the real thing. But look back at $BTC, what business model does it have? None. What income does it have? None either. It only has a fixed total supply and a group of people who believe in it. According to the business model logic, you simply can't explain why $BTC has made it this far. So for me, valuation is the most important thing for long-term targets. No matter how good a project is, if you buy it at a high price, you'll be stuck for years; even an ordinary asset can make you a fortune if you buy it cheap enough. The same thing, entering at a high point or a low point, the outcomes are worlds apart. The business model can tell you if something can survive, income can tell you how well it’s doing, but valuation decides whether you can make money after buying. Buy cheap, even trash can make money; buy expensive, even treasures can lose money. Of course, I’m not saying business models and income are useless; they determine whether I dare to hold heavily or hold long-term. But when it really comes to making the move, valuation is the decisive number. Do you look at valuation for the long term? Let's chat in the comments.👇 #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 Term Structure Radar $BTC annualized basis at three expiration points is relatively flat: the near-term, mid-term, and long-term annualized basis are +5.19%/+5.52%/+5.45% respectively; the raw spread of the near-term contract relative to the index is +$374.9. The annualized pricing differences across the three terms are small, and the term premium does not show a clear widening. $ETH annualized basis decreases with expiration term: the near-term, mid-term, and long-term annualized basis are +5.07%/+4.60%/+4.41% respectively; the raw spread of the near-term contract relative to the index is +$11.74. $SOL annualized basis decreases with expiration term: the near-term, mid-term, and long-term annualized basis are +2.72%/+2.27%/+1.28% respectively; the raw spread of the near-term contract relative to the index is +$0.28. BTC, ETH, SOL: all three expiration points are in contango. ETH, SOL: near-term annualized basis is higher than long-term, with higher annualized pricing concentrated in the near-term. #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard. If I had to choose between these three, as a trader who has weathered countless storms in the crypto world, I would choose the business model. This is not a denial of income and valuation, but a survival decision made based on the unique survival rules of the crypto world under the extreme assumption of only one choice. 1. Why give up income? Because crypto income is full of deception. Many people think the underlying logic of doing real business is income king, and that making money means a good project. But in crypto, focusing solely on income is extremely dangerous. Crypto income is often highly inflated and cyclical. In a bull market, a worthless meme project can generate astonishing income through high fees or funding rates as long as it raises token prices; Some DeFi protocols use over-issued tokens for liquidity mining, with their TVL and protocol revenue on paper being ridiculously high. But what is this called? It's called the false prosperity created by token inflation subsidies. Once a bear market hits or subsidies stop, this income instantly drops to zero, and the project dies as a result. If I only focus on income, it's easy to be deceived by those tens of thousands of percent annual returns at the peak of a bull market to buy in. Revenue is dynamic and changeable; it only proves the project is doing well now, but cannot prove it will survive in the future. Income without business model support is like a castle on the beach—once the tide recedesOKB is a coin without value; its utility depends solely on the platform. Capital will speculate on it, but not now. It is likely to fall below 50. The current rebound is just to absorb chips for creating a new drop, and also to lure buyers.No matter how beautifully the blueprints are drawn, if the load-bearing walls are mixed with sand, a gust of wind will cause a continuous structural collapse. In my eyes, the Global Product and Ecosystem Conference on October 6 was not a launch event, but an on-site inspection—turning those past concepts that remained at the rendering stage into tangible entities that can be delivered and inhabited today. Anyone can draw conceptual renderings; the real skill lies in the construction milestones that can be realized. Let's start with the foundation. The underlying architecture of the entire ecosystem determines how high the upper layers can be built. If the foundation is a modular raft slab with reserved expansion joints, subsequent additions, renovations, and integration of new business models will not tear apart the main structure; if the foundation is temporary rammed earth, the first wave of users will cause uneven settlement. True bearing capacity is not written in brochures; it is hidden in the rhythm of development iterations—each version update is a record of concrete pouring and curing. Skipping steps, rushing work, or inadequate curing will result in a smooth surface but a honeycombed interior. Next, consider this token linked to the US stock market, which to me is like a post-tensioned prestressed beam. The anchoring end's linkage relationship is the tension control stress: when upstream assets move, the stress distribution here immediately redistributes. Excessive premium equals over-tensioning, causing the beam to arch and crack; too deep a discount equals stress loss, causing the entire beam to sag and lack stiffness. What truly deserves attention is not the net inflow number on a certain day, but the seismic-resistant structure of this connection node—when the US stock market's night session shakes violently, does it flexibly dissipate energy and unload stress layer by layer, or is it a rigid connection that cracks all the way through? Most so-called mapping structures fail at the node welds, not the main materials. The efficiency, community, and returns mentioned in the theme are essentially the facade curtain wall system. The curtain wall can be made flashy with glass, metal panels, and lighting, but what determines the building's lifespan is always the supporting keel and sealing joints behind it. If the keel spacing exceeds limits or the sealant joints age, the first heavy rain will cause water leakage and dampness. Creator earnings and token incentives are all curtain wall materials; distribution mechanisms, unlocking curves, and real demand are the keel and structural sealant. No one would accept an entire building just based on a facade rendering, yet the market does this every day. Wind load calculation is the most easily overlooked yet most fatal link. The volatility of crypto assets is the crosswind and vortex vibration that supertall buildings must face. Wind resistance design is not about making the building thicker, but about allowing the structure to dissipate energy itself under a reasonable damping and stiffness ratio. If a project frequently changes governance rules and temporarily adjusts release rhythms during volatile markets, it is equivalent to repeatedly modifying the structural system mid-construction—each change weakens the reliability of existing components, and eventually no one dares to build according to the original plan. I have reviewed drawings for forty years and have seen too many landmarks fall at the final acceptance step. It's not that the design is bad, but that the construction joints were handled carelessly. With the underlying architecture, development capability, and long-term scalability all in place, the building can stand; missing any one of these, no matter how tall the tower, it is just an animation in a bidding demo video. When you tap with a hollow hammer and hear a dull sound, that is its permanent crack. #okxnow：seewhat'snextThe latest data from Bitfinex shows that ETH short positions surged from 771 ETH to over 100,000 ETH in just about two weeks, an increase of nearly 130 times. Recently, the short position size once surpassed 101,000 ETH, becoming an unusual figure that has drawn market attention. This extreme concentration of bears can indeed become the "fuel" for the market: 🔹 if ETH rebounds upward, shorts will widen 🔹 their floating losses. Some bears will be forced to stop losses or cover 🔹 further and buying will further push prices 🔹 higher. Once continuous liquidations form, a rapid Short Squeeze may occur. Currently, ETH is still repeatedly battling near $2,600–$2,700, with recent highs reaching around $2,807, while the $2,760–$2,800 area remains a resistance zone to watch above. More notably, liquidity has not completely weakened. On September 25, the US spot ETH ETF recorded a net inflow of about $87M; Last week, ETH spot ETFs saw a cumulative net inflow of about $689.88M, indicating that institutional funds continue to flow in. ⚠️ But with a surge in bears≠ ETH is bound to rise. If ETH breaks below key support first, bears may continue to profit, turning the market from "short squeeze fuel" to "downward momentum." Therefore, what truly matters is not just the number of bears, but 📌 whether ETH can regain the $2,700/$2,760 📌 level below $2,60September 28–October 4 Global macro guidance: Energy prices as the axis, second rate hike review as the main narrative! Diplomatic narrative fades→ energy risk rebound→ employment and inflation determine the next round of US Treasuries, while China's holiday causes some liquidity support for the market! This week's macro logic chain: #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 China-US summit to be held: Will the market reprice trade and technology risk premiums? US-Iran negotiations continue: Can negotiations continue? Optimistic expectations, Brent price fluctuations determine global energy inflation expectations. US Treasury yields high: How severe is US endogenous inflation? PCE + ISM + Nonfarm Payrolls: Data combination verifies US growth and inflation; October rate hikes reprice, bond market direction choices, and impact on global liquidity? 1. The first main theme: After the China-US summit, both sides validate the summit's results! Although structural contradictions remained unresolved after last week's China-US summit, progress was made in technology and trade. In terms of trade, the trade truce was extended by two months, and China and the US announced tariff cuts for 30 billion yuan worth of goods. On AI, both sides began talks, followed by some media reports that Chinese companies are considering purchasing the latest US chips. Therefore, this week it is important to watch how optimistic the market priced assets before the summit, whether the summit will meet market expectations, how market risk appetite will adjust, whether it will rise more than expected or fall below expectations, especially regarding the two key sectors of technology and trade. So far, media reports indicate progress in AI and tradeBrothers, what do you think? $BTC This chart increasingly looks like the end of a rebound. Another bearish candle on the daily chart, MACD double lines death cross combined with a bearish divergence, sentiment is very likely to break down. 80,000 is a psychological barrier and a key battleground between bulls and bears. A true test may not break it directly, but a false break to shake out is quite possible. On the macro side, non-farm payrolls and PCE will determine rate cut expectations. If Micron's earnings confirm high AI storage demand, tech stocks and the crypto space might leverage that for recovery; the Hormuz negotiations focus on oil prices and safe havens. $ETH and $ZEC have high volatility, don't blindly catch falling knives. Brothers, do you think it will break 80K first or rebound first? See you in the comments 🤨 #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 #财报观察员：美光财报临近，AI存储需求成焦点。 #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 #美伊继续磋商霍尔木兹开放条件 #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $ETH $ZEC "After the rise, first look at support" $SOL pulled back after hitting 124.8, now fluctuating around $120. This level acts like a short-term dividing line: if it holds, sentiment may recover and there’s a chance to retest $125; if it breaks, profit-taking could push it down to $116–118. A consolidation after continuous gains is not surprising; the key is whether $120 can hold. $SPCX slid from $154.8 into a sideways range, currently around $148.85. There is support near $148, but $150–154 remains a resistance zone. Without a volume breakout, it looks more like buying time to create space. $NVDA closed at $225 last week, up about 19% year-to-date. AI demand remains the fundamental support, but the stock price has entered a high-level consolidation zone. Strong fundamentals don’t mean there’s no short-term pullback pressure. Commonality among the three: after prior gains, all have reached resistance zones. At this point, rather than chasing the rally, it’s better to observe the effectiveness of support—if support holds, the trend can continue; if support breaks, prepare for a pullback. The market has entered a "verification period," where patience is more valuable than impulsiveness. #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 #BTC现货ETF周流入创近一年新高 #财报观察员：美光财报临近，AI存储需求成焦点 I continue holding a short position on ZEC, bearish in the long term My current thinking hasn't changed. ZEC is a veteran privacy coin, and with increasing regulatory pressure, its survival space and narrative capability are being squeezed. From my average entry price to the current price around 1556, the account has some unrealized losses, but still within a tolerable range. The position is 2x low leverage, with a liquidation price at 3230BTC The cycle view remains the same~ As long as it doesn't fall back below 8.2, it's not a big problem. Still treat it as a simple bullish one-way market~ Known support at 8.2 (weekly and daily). The minor level 832 is the bottoming point. In terms of operation, combined with liquidity, either wait for the 8.2 area to be reclaimed before entering, with stop loss set at the reclaimed low point. Or enter with the first position at the current price, add to the position after reclaiming 832, and defend the intraday low. No matter where you enter here, the maximum stop loss should not exceed 8.18~ $BTC #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 A long rise must fall, that's the damn truth. $BTC dropped below 84000, $ETH crashed to 2668, and $XAU also plunged from 4319 to 4219. Waterfalls everywhere, the screen full of red. I opened a $SOL short early, the direction was right, but a rebound spike hit my stop loss. By the time I came to my senses, the waterfall was already over. I still had ammo in hand but didn’t dare to chase. Watching others profit from shorts hurts more than losing money. Like a fortune teller predicting rain but ending up drenched. I don’t care about the software, staring at the big bearish candle, remember: it’s not enough to be right, you have to hold on. Wishing the bears wealth. $BTC $ETH $XAU #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 ZEC Bulls and Bears in Fierce Battle: Retail Investors Panic Sell, Whales Accumulate Against the Trend ZEC is undergoing a classic "deleveraging shakeout." The 24-hour contract trading volume reached $6.334 billion, with a net capital inflow of $652 million, yet the price dropped 4.41%—a volume-driven decline that superficially signals capital flight. Retail investors are panicking, whales are greedy. Binance retail long-short ratio is only 0.5396, and OKX is even lower at 0.5, indicating retail sentiment has hit rock bottom, with many shorting or exiting to watch. However, whale data reveals a completely different signal: the number of whales with short positions is indeed the majority at a 0.5122 long-short ratio; yet the whales' position long-short ratio is as high as 1.0861—real money is dominantly betting on the long side. Simply put, whales verbally say no, but their actions are honest. This divergence of "more shorts in number, more longs in position size" often signals a trend reversal. Key levels: · Support below: $1500-$1550 · Resistance above: $1650 A volume-driven decline does mean short-term downward momentum may continue, but whales holding long positions against the trend shows smart money does not believe the trend is over. In practice, do not rush to bottom-fish; wait for a pullback to stabilize in the $1520-$1550 range before lightly going long, and decisively exit if support breaks. The essence of a shakeout is to wash out weak hands. When retail sentiment is extremely bearish, the bottom is often near. $BTC $ETH #ZEC再创本轮新高，逼近1700美元 唱反调者质疑Celo，社区为何不怕？——一场关于“真金不怕火”的辩论 2026年9月，$CELO 价格长期徘徊在0.09美元附近，较2021年高点下跌超过99%。与此同时，Celo链上日活地址稳定在40万以上，USDT转账量位居全链前列。价格与基本面的严重背离，引发了社区内外的激烈辩论。唱反调的人说Celo没有价值，社区却说真金不怕火。双方到底谁更有道理？我们把正反两方的观点摊开来谈。 反方阵营：唱反调者在说什么 第一，代币价值捕获彻底失灵。安全评级机构Hindenrank给予CELO D+级，即低于平均的价值捕获评级，明确指出大部分协议收入尚未流向代币持有者，费用捕获得分仅为5/25，并将其归类为Dead Money象限，意思是风险低，但价值捕获机制缺失。社区成员whitehat.wsd在治理论坛上发帖质问团队：Celo网络表现出色，日活地址47万至50万，日交易量超110万笔，MiniPay钱包超1400万，USDT使用量在L2中名列前茅，然而市值却卡在约3600万美元。这已经不能用市场还没理解来解释了。他直言，如果这种状况长期持续，将引发核心贡献者离开、流动性不足导致波动加剧、难#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 After reading today's popular trader Q&A, as an early veteran, I deeply resonate. Having witnessed too many ups and downs, I want to share some hard-earned lessons paid for with real losses from liquidations. 🎯Today's Q: What matters more, income, business model, or valuation? My answer: Business model > Income > Valuation. Valuation is often an emotional bubble, income can be faked by volume manipulation, only a truly proven business model can survive a deep bear market. 🚫Never blindly trust grand narratives of altcoins! Claims like "disrupting ecosystems" or "100x myths" are just project teams pumping and brainwashing. 🔪Don't talk about vision with altcoins, decisively cut and leave! Altcoins are for speculation, not heirlooms. Once the trend turns bad, you must decisively liquidate and exit. The more you talk about vision, the faster your principal dies. ⚖️Asset allocation must be reasonable, always leave yourself a way out. Use large positions in mainstream coins as ballast, and only small positions in altcoins for speculation. Never go full position; keep U for extreme market conditions. 🛑Strict trading discipline, you must control your hands! No matter how much you understand, if you can't control your hands, it's useless. Frequent trading and FOMO lose more than just wrong direction calls. 🤖Recently, I've been testing bot-assisted trading. Human nature has weaknesses, so entrust discipline to machines to strictly execute take-profit and stop-loss. Still in testing phase, will report data later. Only after experiencing bull and bear markets do you understand: don't blindly join every frenzy, protect your principal, survive first, then you have the right to talk about the future. How do you control your hands normally? Anyone using bots? Let's chat in the comments👇340,000 USD stolen, stuck for 27 minutes after the 24-hour transfer limit was lifted At 4:12 AM on September 27, an account started transferring money out. Within 13 minutes, 322,110 USDT and 9,133,999 ONE were transferred out. Where did the money come from: Security settings were reset by someone, so the account belonged to the other party. The 24-hour transfer limit was just lifted 27 minutes ago, and the money was gone. How this amount was calculated: The two transfers combined are about 340,000 USD, which was calculated. The attacker also left an API that was not revoked. The platform said the preliminary investigation is complete and will communicate one-on-one via email. The user has already submitted a claim and the ticket number has been recorded. Resetting security settings and revoking API are two different things; the former locks the door, the latter takes away the key. The door is locked, but the key is still in the other party's hands. #特朗普政府拟推海外稳定币计划 #Aave支持代币化美股抵押借USDC #CME拟推BCH与UNI期货 $USDT $ONE Today, countless times I wanted to add to my position but finally managed to control myself. I must accept the loss and not add to the position just because I'm holding a losing trade. Everyone has loss aversion psychology, and it must be overcome! When it reaches 1600, I will firmly stop adding to the position.Sentiment TOP signal? 1. #BTC spot ETF 7-day inflow ~$3B - everyone is euphoric 2. $XRP hacked >$80M stolen - black swan ignored 3. Sentiment too good for many days - when market rises, bad news hidden Whale playbook: Use hack as excuse to dump while retail is greedy 4. $HYPE large unlock tomorrow - many tokens still locked, supply heavy, 90 can't hold Peak for now IMO. Risk off.#PCEAndPayrollsWeek #BTCETFInflowsHit1YHigh #ZECNears1700NewHigh $BTC $XRP $HYPE #BTC现货ETF周流入创近一年新高 $BTC BTC: Bullish in the long term, bearish in the short term. The Federal Reserve is still in a tightening/interest rate hike cycle, liquidity is tight, and the probability of risk assets going straight up is low. After BTC fell back from above 84,000, short-term momentum weakened. The market needs a pullback to clear leverage, digest profits, and consolidate the bottom chip structure. Short-term outlook: First watch for a pullback near $81,000; if it breaks down effectively, further downside to the $79,000 area is expected. This is a psychological threshold and a dense chip support zone. Stop loss is set at $84,000; if it stabilizes above this again, it means the short-term bearish logic is falsified and the direction needs to be reassessed. Long-term outlook is not pessimistic: Institutions have not significantly reduced allocations during the pullback, the halving cycle and the US dollar credit cracks remain, and the long-term bull market logic is intact. This currently looks more like a correction within a bull market rather than a trend reversal. After liquidity pressure eases and bottom turnover is sufficient, the rise will be more solid. Strategy: Do not chase highs in the short term, wait for a pullback; observe support at 81,000/79,000, stop loss at 84,000. Personal opinion, not investment advice. $BTC $SOL is rebounding short today ✌️Range between 145 and 155, if the rally weakens tonight, it will need to test lower...@OKX Planet $SOL under pressure! Price rebounds but on-chain activity shrinks, no increase in ETF funds, Gas only 0.01 Gwei. Volatility is greater than ETH, with sharper spikes. Key levels: 160 resistance: if it breaks below 148, the target is 135 #本周迎非农与PCE关键数据 #财报观察员：美光财报临近，AI存储需求成焦点 #美伊继续磋商霍尔木兹开放条件 $ZEC $XAU Under the pressure of high interest rates, why does gold still attract funds? Real interest rates create valuation pressure, but geopolitical uncertainty, inflation risks, and reserve demand provide hedging value. If yields are high and gold prices refuse to fall, it indicates strong safe-haven buying. If the dollar and real interest rates continue to rise and risk premiums fade, I would be cautious.When the market is cold, no one talks about $ORDI When the market heats up, everyone starts asking: "Why didn't I buy it back then?" The market is just that interesting.ETH is approaching $2700, but I'm more concerned about who is willing to stay Around 11:00 on September 27, the OKEx page showed $ETH at about $2698. $2700 is within sight, but being just two dollars away and truly holding above it are two different things. The price can be pushed past by a single active buy order, but a new cost zone requires subsequent trades to gradually form. Seeing this position today, I'm not in a hurry to translate the round number as a trend confirmation. If the price quickly retreats after crossing $2700 and the volume mainly concentrates in those few minutes of the spike, it looks more like a brief probe. Conversely, even if the first attempt doesn't break through, as long as selling pressure gradually weakens on the pullback and the trading focus moves upward, buyers may be accumulating initiative. Looking only at the latest price, it's easy to mistake the process for the result. I am bullish on Ethereum in the long term, but in the short term, I am willing to give the market time to prove itself. A price worth staying at requires spot support, not everyone simultaneously shouting target levels. When observing later, the focus is whether the volume position after the pullback holds and whether the upward push depends on increasingly aggressive leverage. $2700 is not a threshold I set for the market, nor is it a reason to buy just because it is reached. It is simply a coordinate convenient for observation today. If the price repeatedly crosses it without forming a stable trading zone, continue to interpret it as consolidation; if new buyers are willing to keep turnover at higher levels, then there is more evidence for trend discussion. Being bullish can be clear, but execution need not be rushed.ETH is approaching $2700, but I'm more concerned about who is willing to stay Around 11:00 on September 27, the OKEx page showed $ETH at about $2698. $2700 is within sight, but being just two dollars away and truly holding above it are two different things. The price can be pushed past by a single active buy order, but a new cost zone requires subsequent trades to gradually form. Seeing this position today, I'm not in a hurry to translate the round number as a trend confirmation. If the price quickly retreats after crossing $2700 and the volume mainly concentrates in those few minutes of the spike, it looks more like a brief probe. Conversely, even if the first attempt doesn't break through, as long as selling pressure gradually weakens on the pullback and the trading focus moves upward, buyers may be accumulating initiative. Looking only at the latest price, it's easy to mistake the process for the result. I am bullish on Ethereum in the long term, but in the short term, I am willing to give the market time to prove itself. A price worth staying at requires spot support, not everyone simultaneously shouting target levels. When observing later, the focus is whether the volume position after the pullback holds and whether the upward push depends on increasingly aggressive leverage. $2700 is not a threshold I set for the market, nor is it a reason to buy just because it is reached. It is simply a coordinate convenient for observation today. If the price repeatedly crosses it without forming a stable trading zone, continue to interpret it as consolidation; if new buyers are willing to keep turnover at higher levels, then there is more evidence for trend discussion. Being bullish can be clear, but execution need not be rushed.[Old Chive Observation] About the third of six coins worth watching after US stocks access DeFi $ONDO This is currently the one you cannot ignore. Ondo itself is tokenizing US stocks and ETFs, and Ondo's SPYon and QQQon have already entered Morpho, where they can be collateralized to borrow USDC. It's no longer just about "buying an on-chain US stock." It is moving towards: tokenized stocks → DeFi collateral → borrowing stablecoins. Ondo's SPYon, QQQon, TSLAon, and other assets have already entered the DeFi lending market. So if in the future the market hype is not about "a certain RWA project," but about: after US stocks are fully on-chain, whether these stocks can enter DeFi? Then ONDO and LINK are very direct related targets. After stocks become on-chain assets, whether they can continue to be used for borrowing money is the key step for RWA to transform from trading assets into financial assets. Entry: $0.45–$0.55 Take profit: $0.62 / $0.68 / $0.75 / $0.85 Stop loss: $0.4 The biggest highlight of ONDO now is that tokenized stocks are starting to develop from "can be bought" to "can be used to borrow money."
Orbit Topic Sitemap