Orbit Post Sitemap
$ONE actually managed to rise for 4 consecutive days, which I really didn't expect!
Looking back at the Harmony situation gives me chills. After all, this is an L1 that has been running for seven years, and the team just said they would shut it down. ONE was directly moved to Ethereum as an ERC20 token, switching to AI video.
You think on-chain assets are rock solid? In August, a cross-shard vulnerability suddenly created a huge amount of ONE out of thin air. In the end, the project team didn't even want to fix it and just retired the entire chain.
So I'm quite surprised it could rise for 4 days straight.
If you hold ONE, don't panic. The snapshot will airdrop tokens to Ethereum addresses, so the coins won't disappear. But the project's credibility has collapsed. Don't add more positions long-term on a chain that can shut down on a whim. That $1.37 million compensation pool is for validator nodes and has little to do with retail investors.
The AI video story is just something to listen to. Play mainstream spot markets; don't get involved in these zero-risk plays. Shorts are just fuel; putting more in might just blow it up. DYOR$ZIL USDT perpetual 20x long, entered at 0.003819, currently at 0.004028, floating profit 109.45%. This position caught the bottom after the negative impact of the July Ledger app vulnerability (private key leak causing abnormal outflow from exchange cold wallets) was fully absorbed. Subsequently, on September 2, the first batch of exchanges (KuCoin, MEXC, etc.) migrated the fork, and the second hard fork (EVM address migration on September 22) is expected soon.
From the order book perspective, the bottom around 0.0038 was consolidated for a long time, then sharply pulled up to 0.004028 at the close, with the price action first suppressed then rising. On-chain: during the vulnerability fallout, short positions clustered pushing up lending rates, underlying protocols remained unaffected, recent USDT net inflow surged, and after chip washing, low circulation forced a short squeeze.
Holding this 20x floating profit, leveraging the aftermath of the security incident repair and fork migration, the 0.004 level is a tug-of-war between bulls and bears, volume is not crazy, watching the fork landing on the 22nd and funding rates. $BTC $ETH #BTC维持8万美元，加密市场修复扩散 #BTC Funding
When Bitcoin rebounds, the most easily overlooked signal might be that corporate treasuries are not as active as before.
CoinDesk cited Glassnode data on September 18, stating that publicly listed companies have only increased their holdings by about 5,900 BTC in the past three months, far less than the same period last year; the average cost of corporate treasuries is about $80,500, while spot prices once hovered around $76,400, meaning they are still overall at an unrealized loss. Public companies hold about 1.22 million BTC, with Strategy holding about 845,000 BTC, indicating a high concentration.
This does not mean institutional demand has disappeared: U.S. spot ETFs have still seen inflows since early August. However, the slowdown in corporate treasury buying and stablecoin supply plateauing around $300 billion to $310 billion indicate that new marginal funds are not as strong as the price rebound suggests.
I consider $80,500 as a key observation point: if it holds above this level, the unrealized loss pressure on corporate holdings eases; if repeatedly resisted, it suggests these chips may become supply overhead. The rebound depends on absorption, not just candlestick patterns. $BTC 📊 Four tickers don’t mean four separate risks.
$BTC C, $ETH H, $CORE E, and $ZEC may look diversified, but a broad risk-off move can still pull them down together.
With BTC around $81K and liquidity still driving sentiment, correlation matters more than ticker count.
Real diversification = managing exposure, size, and correlation — not just holding more coins.
#Crypto #BTC #ETH #CORE #ZEC #RiskManagement #DailyOrbitLate at night, watching the candlestick chart, the numbers fluctuate like an electrocardiogram. In this market filled with leverage and desire, behind every profit and loss figure lies a real gold game and a battle of human nature. Recently, ZEC has been oscillating and resting around $1,600, calm on the surface, but beneath the surface, it's a whale-level battle of strangling and strangling. According to on-chain data, the suspected Garrett Jin address holds about 202,000 ZEC spot (worth about $320 million) and holds nearly 38,000 ZEC short positions, with an unrealized loss exceeding $33 million. Many people exclaim that huge floating losses are on the verge of collapse, but to seasoned veterans, this is nothing more than a textbook hedging game between spot and derivatives. The ones who truly regret exiting are those who have reversed their direction and lack spot safety cushions—like the big holder who took a loss of about $10.68 million and sold out $24.43 million in short positions; Meanwhile, players who built nearly ten thousand long positions at the low of $517 now hold tens of millions in unrealized gains, watching coldly. Profit-taking by bulls and trampling by bears are accumulating the next wave of volatility storms. This extreme long-bear divide is especially common today when traditional finance and crypto assets are deeply intertwined. Looking at traditional markets, whether it's the market value battle between Nvidia and Apple (AppleTops Nvidia) or the spillover effects triggered by semiconductor giants' crashes (SKHYNIX Peers Crash), the liquidity logic of traditional assets has long permeated the crypto ecosystem. Especially for tokenized US stock stocks Just about to go to the forum to rant, but then I checked my balance and decided against it. The market daddy is always right.
$AAVE perpetual contract 50x long, opened at 132.93, rose to 136.85, floating profit 147.44%.
$PROS short position entered around 0.5571, current price slowly dropped to 0.4889, floating profit 243.76%.
In the early session when the market was just dumped, PROS looked like it was going to counterattack, but the volume didn’t keep up at all. Every rally was just short of breath; this kind of rebound is a typical sign of insufficient support. Watching around 0.5571, I didn’t hesitate and shorted as planned, betting it wouldn’t bounce.
It actually cooperated, sliding down steadily from 0.5571 to 0.4889, now floating profit +243.76%. This move was incredibly smooth.
Operationally, first take profit on 70% to secure gains, don’t let paper profits turn into a roller coaster; move the stop loss on the remaining 30% up near the cost price for protection. If it rebounds past that, exit first; if it continues to drop, let the profits run.
Being out of position isn’t a sin; opening positions recklessly is the mistake. Risk control done upfront is called rational; cutting losses after losing is called decisive.
Now is not the time to chase shorts; the more it falls, the more you have to guard against rebounds. I’ll call out the next comfortable entry point as soon as it comes. There are still opportunities, hold on patiently. $ZEC $ETH #ZEC高位震荡，多空仓位开始分化 The latest data from $BTC CME shows that the probability of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates by 25 basis points in October has risen to 55.4%. This should have been a heavy blow to the crypto market—higher interest rates mean the opportunity cost of holding interest-free assets like Bitcoin increases further.
However, the market's actual reaction is intriguing. After the rate hike in September, Bitcoin not only did not crash but also held the key moving average structure at $76,000, then strongly rebounded above $80,000 catalyzed by the SEC's "innovation exemption" policy. ETF funds quickly shifted from outflows to net inflows, forcing shorts to cover and creating a short squeeze rally.
Grayscale research head Zach Pandl's interpretation is quite representative: this rate hike feels more like a "mid-cycle adjustment" rather than a systemic policy shift like in 2022. The market had already priced in the rate hike expectations in advance, so when the "boot drops," the negative impact is already fully reflected.
However, a 55% probability is not a signal to be taken lightly. If consecutive rate hikes do occur in October, it means the Fed has very low tolerance for inflation stickiness, and the persistence of a high interest rate environment will be repriced. The core contradiction in the crypto market currently is whether the structural buying from ETFs can continue to absorb the macro headwinds. The $76,000 to $77,700 range is the boundary between bulls and bears; holding this range means consolidation and accumulation, while breaking below could lead to a pullback near $72,000. The crypto community is learning to coexist with a "higher for longer" interest rate environment, but the real test has yet to come. $ETH $ZEC #BTC holding at $80,000 Writing
📊 Holding 4 coins does not mean you are truly diversifying 4 portions of risk.
$BTC, $ETH, $CORE, $ZEC may seem like different assets, but when the entire crypto market enters a safe-haven mode, their correlation often rises rapidly.
Once market liquidity begins to withdraw and risk appetite declines, several coins may experience a simultaneous pullback—seemingly dispersed holdings, but in reality, they may still bear the same type of "market risk."
True asset allocation isn't just about increasing your holdings, but about focusing on:
🔹 Correlations between different assets
🔹 Position ratio versus overall risk exposure
🔹 Changes in market liquidity
🔹 Resilience to pullbacks in extreme market conditions
4 tickers ≠ 4 independent risks.
When the market rises, look at returns; when the market weakens, you should look at your own risk exposure.
True decentralization means reducing the portfolio's dependence on a single market direction, rather than letting the code in the account grow larger.
#BTC #ETH #CORE #ZEC #Crypto #加密货币 #投资风险 #资产配置No operation, no analysis, just pure luck; I even feel embarrassed to share this record.
$DYDX perpetual contract 20x long, opened at 0.12119, rose to 0.12753, floating profit 104.62%.
$VVV short position entered around 26.656, current price dropped to 22.641, floating profit 301.77%.
Actually, the positions were set up in advance. When VVV was just dumped in the morning session, the selling pressure above was heavy, bulls tried hard but couldn’t break 26.656. Seeing the volume couldn’t keep up, I immediately placed a short and then went to have breakfast.
When I came back, the price had dropped directly to 22.641, and the account showed a floating profit of +301.77%. Only then did I realize, those who watch the market less and move less often usually end up the happiest.
Closed 70% of the position first, safely pocketing the profit; moved the stop loss of the remaining 30% near the cost price, if it drops further, let it snowball on its own, at worst I just earn less.
The market punishes all kinds of arrogance, especially those who think they are the smartest. Being out of the market is not a sin; recklessly opening positions is the mistake. If you don’t open, at least you won’t be wrong.
Don’t chase the dump at this position. If I really want to short again, I will give a heads-up before the next rebound ends. $ZEC $BTC The most dangerous thing on the chessboard is not the opponent's sacrificed piece, but when you think you have the advantage in the midgame—when in fact you've already entered a losing endgame. $NMR is exactly in this situation now.
It has only risen 2.41% in 24 hours, and many people relax seeing this lukewarm movement. But the real killer move is hidden in the structure: the short-term Bollinger Bands position has reached 112%, with the price running close to the outer side of the upper band, just -0.4% from the upper band—this is not a breakout, but a false signal before bleeding. The mid-term Bollinger Bands stand at 71%, still 1.6% away from the upper band, indicating the midgame is not over yet, but the space has been compressed. The short-term RSI reads 65.3, called "neutral," but this is precisely a trap-like "mildness"—the short, mid, and long-term RSIs are all stuck in a narrow corridor between 45 and 65, with no side gaining decisive material advantage.
The signal from the board is clear: positions above 120% of the upper band are tolls all bulls must pay. The entry point is set at $9.31, 1.5% higher than the current price—this deliberately makes the opponent take an extra step, pushing my pawn to a square where he can capture it but will pay a price. When the price hits $9.31, the bears have already completed their heavy piece deployment.
Stop loss at $10.16, 10.7% above the current price. This is not cowardice, but a "castling" on the chessboard—protect the king first, then attack. True grandmasters never commit all their forces on one path; a 10.7% buffer is enough to withstand an irrational counterattack.
First target $8.63, down 5.9% from the current price; second target $8.82, a 3.9% retracement. Take the near material first, then capture the distant endgame.
📉 Short:
Entry: 9.31 (current price +1.5%)
Take profit 1: 8.63 (-5.9%)
Take profit 2: 8.82 (-3.9%)
Stop loss: 10.16 (+10.7%)
While the opponent is still counting the pawns he has captured, I have already calculated the endgame thirty moves ahead. #strategyplaybookA building never collapses because of a leaking roof, but because someone drove the foundation piles into quicksand.
$MORPHO is currently conducting a static load test on the foundation piles. A 4.54% settlement over 24 hours—this is not a collapse, but a controlled settlement. The real danger lies in misjudgment—many see a drop and shout "structural instability," but I never look at the facade; I only examine the load-bearing system.
Short-term stress monitoring has already provided readings: RSI on the hourly scale is 34.9, breaking below the 38 warning line; while the long-term RSI remains at 48.9, still below the midline. This is not a double top; it is a typical condition of short-term load concentration with an intact long-term framework.
More critically, the displacement of the Bollinger Bands: the short-term price is already at the 12% position, with only 0.9% margin to the lower band; the mid-term is even more extreme, with the price at the 4% position, just 0.3% from the lower band. What does this mean on the blueprint? It means the floor slab has already pressed onto the elastic supports; any further descent will cause rigid contact—reaction forces will appear immediately. The net heights of 6.5% and 6.2% above are the reserved floor heights of this structure.
My construction plan:
📈 Long:
Entry: 1.86 (current price -2.3%)
Take Profit 1: 2.06 (+8.0%)
Take Profit 2: 2.03 (+6.2%)
Stop Loss: 1.69 (-11.6%)
Entry is placed 2.3% below the current price—not to be cheap, but to leave a buffer layer for pile driving. Stop loss is set at 1.69, 11.6% away from the current price; this margin is as wide as an underground parking level—wide stop loss is not cowardice, but allows energy dissipation for structural deformation. A true designer never locks the stop loss right at the beam bottom.
Using an 11.6% settlement margin to gain an 8.0% first-level elevation, the risk-reward ratio may not be elegant, but with short-term oversold conditions combined with the mid-term 4% double support position, every dip in this range is an opportunity to reinforce the piles.
The white paper is a rendering; anyone can make it look good. What determines whether this building can stand for fifty years is whether the underlying lending infrastructure will continuously collapse under extreme market conditions, and whether the liquidation engine has enough ductility. I have reviewed $MORPHO's blueprint; the structural logic holds, only the curing period is missing.
This current stage is the formwork support phase. $BTC appears calm on the surface, but there are strong undercurrents beneath
It just dropped from above $81,800 intraday, and the price is now hovering around $80,300
Above is the trapped position from the recent rally, below is the short-term buying defense line at $80,000; whoever gives up first will set the direction
Don’t rush to guess the next candlestick, first write the script:
✅ True bullish signal: reclaim above $81,000 and then break through $81,800 → only then will the short-term structure revive, with $82,500 area in sight.
⚠️ Bearish signal: if $80,000 support fails and the rebound can’t hold → switch to defensive mindset, expect a drop to $79,000–$78,500 for support.
Right now, it’s not about speed, but about having a plan
Moving recklessly before price confirmation just hands fees to the market
Wait for the signal to play out before following, slower but longer lasting.📊 More coins in a portfolio doesn’t always mean more diversification.
$BTC , $ETH , $CORE , and $ZEC may look like separate positions, but a broad crypto sell-off can pull them in the same direction.
When liquidity dries up, different assets can suddenly behave like one trade.
The key isn’t owning more tickers.
It’s understanding your total market exposure and managing risk accordingly. 🔥
#CryptoRecoveryBroadens
#UNI21%RallyOnSECRule
#ZECPositionsDiverge The surge after the exhaustion of positive news is often the most comfortable hunting ground for bears.
$DOOD perpetual contract 20x long, opened at 0.001624, rose to 0.001795, with an unrealized profit of 210.59%.
$TAO short position entered at 263.5 following the trend, current price retraced to 253.7, 50x leverage yielded 185% profit.
From September 18-19, TAO rose for two consecutive days, surging to around 273. However, the earlier positive news from Raydium's launch had already been priced in, holding volume declined, and buying momentum clearly lagged.
Therefore, a short was opened at 263.5 following the trend. On the 20th, TAO indeed retraced about 6%, current price at 253.7, 50x leverage earned 185% profit.
Watch the 250 support closely going forward. If it holds, a rebound testing resistance at 277 is possible; if broken, downside target is 217. The realization of positive news marks a turning point, moving along with the tide of capital outflow. $ZEC $BTC #SEC代币化股票创新豁免落地，UNI intraday surged over 21% #SEC tokenized stock innovation exemption lands, UNI surges over 21% intraday
Is this really bearish for $BTC?
My answer: Short-term diversion, long-term not necessarily.
The SEC has granted a 5-year temporary exemption for tokenized US stock trading that meets certain conditions, allowing on-chain trading through permissioned AMMs and liquidity pools. This is not a full liberalization of securities on-chain, nor a direct approval of $UNI.
But why is the market first hyping UNI? Because this time it opens "traditional assets + on-chain liquidity," and AMM is exactly Uniswap's core strength. $ETH also benefits; the expansion of RWA, stablecoins, and tokenized stocks could all bring incremental growth to the Ethereum ecosystem.
Looking at $BTC, it will indeed lose some attention in the short term, but this does not mean $BTC's fundamentals are weakening; rather, the on-chain pie is getting bigger.
My view: Short term sees capital diversion, long term sees market expansion.
What’s really worth watching is whether, after traditional assets go on-chain, this new influx of funds will eventually include both BTC and ETH in their allocations. If so, this looks more like expanding the Crypto frontier rather than undermining BTC. $BTC $ETH On the morning Pompeii was destroyed, the vast majority turned to charcoal in their sleep, while I had just unearthed boxes of gold coins in the excavation pit.
Brushing volcanic ash off my shovel, I squinted at the long positions I placed last night and sprang up from the camp bed. Those panic orders buried under the ruins, wailing, handed over their most precious chips; waking up to this, I made a huge profit. The gains were enough not only to buy a full set of top-tier carbon-14 dating instruments but even to treat everyone at the excavation site to an extra meal!
There is nothing new under the sun. Looking through loan contracts on clay tablets from three thousand years ago, one understands that the collective human panic always recurs in the same strata. Last night, $SUI fell below the lower Bollinger Band, and the 1-hour RSI plunged to around 26 in the oversold abyss. This is by no means an apocalypse, just panic-stricken traders once again dropping their armor in the ancient Roman Colosseum.
Joy aside, as a veteran crawling through tombs, I know too well that greed turns people into burial figurines. Since the floating profit is already safely in the pocket, reason must be as cold as a bronze chisel, quickly tightening the protective barrier, never returning the acquired relics to the quicksand.
- Target: $SUI 🟢
- Entry: 0.8110 - 0.8250
- TP1: 0.8650
- TP2: 0.8830
- SL: 0.7890
Stratigraphy never lies; the dating is complete. When the dust of panic settles, the greedy tomb raiders will be swallowed by the abyss.
#CoinMoveAlertDon't just focus on BTC over the weekend: SOL's capital flow actually shines more this week
Let's clarify the capital flow first — according to public data, from 9/14 to 9/18, the US spot Solana ETF saw a net inflow of about $61 million, with Bitwise's BSOL contributing the majority; meanwhile, the spot $ETH ETF had a net outflow of about $140 million during the same week. On Friday, BSOL's trading volume even surged to around $85 million, with SOL intraday touching approximately 112–114.
It's normal for the thin weekend market to give back gains. OKX spot has now retreated to just above 100 (based on real-time K-line). What concerns me more is not the new highs, but whether next week's ETF net inflows can continue and whether the support around 100 can hold after the pullback.
$BTC is still hovering above 80,000 over the weekend, and $ETH above 2,600 — BTC holding steady is key for altcoin capital stories to hold up. Don't mistake the volume spike on Friday alone as a confirmed trend.
(Public market and capital flow analysis, not investment advice.)
$SOL $BTC $ETH #SOL #Solana #BTC #ETH #BSOL #ETFInflow #WeekendMarket #AltcoinCapital🚨 DON’T CHASE THE PUMP — THIS MARKET IS MOVING TOO FAST.
I’m not adding to my $AKE short here. I’m already short from 0.618, and I’m willing to sit tight for a few days while the position unlocks.
New coins pumping hard isn’t unusual. The key is not getting trapped by the sentiment. On-chain data reportedly shows a suspected market maker withdrawing around 200M AKE, while the related address cluster holds roughly 12B AKE, around 54% of circulating supply.
#DailyOrbit 📊 Having $BTC , $ETH , $CORE , and $ZEC in your portfolio doesn’t automatically mean you have four independent positions.
When the broader market turns defensive, these assets can move together as liquidity leaves crypto.
Real diversification isn’t about how many coins you hold.
It’s about how different your risk exposures actually are.
Manage the correlation. Manage the position size. 🔥
#CryptoRecoveryBroadens
#UNI21%RallyOnSECRule
#ZECPositionsDiverge $TAO perpetual 50x long position, opened at 236.8, currently at 252.9, floating profit +339.94%.
Bittensor is a decentralized AI leader. 21 million hard cap (similar to AI version of Bitcoin), no ICO, fair launch. Halving completed in December 2025 (daily emission reduced to 3600 tokens). About 70% of supply is staked, with very low circulating float. Recent positives: V440/V450 upgrade (Emission Gate mechanism directs emissions to high-demand subnets), bridging Robinhood Chain, Grayscale/Bitwise spot ETF applications (decision window in August), Q1 institutional inflow about 620 million. But fundamentals are questionable: real external revenue only 3-15 million per year (excluding token subsidies), subnets highly dependent on inflation subsidies.
Long at 236.8, very light position.
Trailing stop moved to 245 breakeven. Watching resistance at 255-276.
⚠️ Risks: high staking control, revenue falsification controversy, ETF rejection risk, extremely high risk with 50x leverage. +339% floating profit, take profit immediately or move stop loss to preserve capital. $ZEC $AKE Rate hikes have landed, but regulation is accelerating. These two things happening simultaneously are not contradictory.
The House of Representatives is pushing two bills: tax certainty and reserve modernization, while the SEC grants a five-year exemption for tokenized stocks. Legislation is a slow variable, interest rates are a fast variable, and short-term prices are still pressured by high interest rates.
However, once the system is embedded into law with lock-up periods measured in years, the exit cost far exceeds that of a single rate hike. $UNI surged over 21% intraday, more likely pricing in the compliance pathway rather than a rate cut.
Focus on two things: whether the bills enter a vote, and whether there is real trading volume after the exemption is implemented. If only the former happens without the latter, this round is just expectations.
#SEC代币化股票创新豁免落地，UNI盘中涨超21%
#美联储10月再加息概率破55% #全球高利率预期再升温 $UNI $ETH is slightly bearish in the short term, mainly shorting on rebounds. Current price is 2574.47, MA5=2579.09 has crossed below MA20=2618.7, moving averages show a bearish alignment, indicating weakening mid-term structure; RSI=34.0 is approaching oversold but not yet dulled, indicating downward momentum is still being released rather than exhausted; MACD histogram -9.195 remains bearish with no sign of volume contraction or reversal. The lower Bollinger band at 2564.01 is the nearest support, price is running along the band, and a valid break below will open downside space; the upper band at 2673.4 and MA20 form double resistance. Funding rate +0.0049% remains positive, long positions have relatively high cost, while the Fear and Greed Index at 71 is in the greed zone, showing a divergence between sentiment and price, which may trigger a chain reaction of passive long position reductions.
In terms of operation, short in batches on rebounds in the 2590–2610 range (above MA5 and below the lower edge of the Bollinger middle band), stop loss at 2640 (above MA20, a breakout would invalidate the bearish structure); take profit 1 at 2564 (lower Bollinger band, first technical support), take profit 2 at 2530 (extension of previous low, measured target after breaking below the lower band). If price directly breaks below 2564 with volume and then recovers, it can be considered a false breakout and should exit promptly. $ZEC The core contradiction in the high-level oscillation lies in the battle between the 1550-1600 liquidation wall and the 1420 support. Current data shows that the bears have suffered significant damage, but the game is not over yet.
On Hyperliquid, the largest liquidation wall for ZEC is near $1550, gathering about $20.4 million in liquidation positions. Other liquidation walls nearby are all less than a quarter of this scale. This means that if the price effectively breaks through 1600, forced short covering by bears could trigger a chain short squeeze.
The short-term support below is near $1420. If this is lost, concentrated stop-loss selling by bulls may emerge, and the depth of the pullback could extend to 1375 or even 1250.
Address 0x362a: Since September 17, it has consecutively stopped out 7 times, covering about $5.196 million in positions at an average price of $1484.4, realizing a loss of about $2.161 million. The remaining short position still holds 4x full position leverage, with unrealized losses of about $7.59 million, a loss rate of -285%. The liquidation price has been raised from $1509 to $1550.6, only about 4.4% away from the liquidation line.
Garrett Jin: Holds about 37,999 ZEC short positions, with an average entry price of about $671.05, currently unrealized losses of about $33.87 million. His liquidation price is near $4789, with relatively controllable short-term pressure.
$ZEC After a surge, momentum often fades, which is usually the right moment for the bears to act.
$ZEN perpetual contract 50x long, opened at 7.241, rose to 7.663, with an unrealized profit of 291.39%.
$ZEC short position entered at 1494.4, price retraced to 1449.1, unrealized profit of 151.56%.
Reviewing the basis for this short trade: ZEC rebounded from 1300 to 1590 in the past two days, an increase of over 20%. But on the 20th, after a surge, it pulled back, and the RSI showed a clear weakening of momentum, with around 1450 becoming a key support.
Therefore, a 50x short was opened at 1494.4, and the price fell back to 1449.1, yielding an unrealized profit of 151.56%.
Going forward, closely watch the 1450 level. Holding it means range-bound oscillation; breaking it could accelerate a bottom test near 1400. Do not chase the surge; waiting for momentum to weaken before acting is more prudent. $ZEC $BTC #BTC维持8万美元，加密市场修复扩散 Oil prices soar → inflation expectations rise → the Fed finds it harder to turn dovish → non-interest assets come under pressure, this transmission chain is playing out in the crypto market.
Data as of September 20: BTC is at $81,257, down slightly 0.43% in 24 hours but still up about 5% for the week; ETH is at $2,626, up slightly 0.07% in 24 hours, showing relative resilience; SOL has retraced the most, at $110.84, down 2.42% in 24 hours. The total market cap is about $2.77 trillion, down about 3% in 24 hours.
There is a detail worth noting on the funding side: on September 18, the US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net inflow of about $433 million, and the Ethereum ETF net inflow was about $144 million. But for the whole week, BTC ETF only netted about $6.2 million—in the middle of the week there was a large withdrawal, then a recovery on Friday, showing institutional sentiment remains unsettled.
A more accurate description now is: after the rebound, the market has entered a phase of divergence. BTC has held the $80,000 level, the structure remains relatively healthy; but SOL weakened first, with total market cap falling back, and chasing funds are starting to hesitate.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#BTC维持8万美元，加密市场修复扩散
#SEC代币化股票创新豁免落地，UNI盘中涨超21%
#ZEC高位震荡，多空仓位开始分化 The Fear and Greed Index at 71 is still in the greed zone, and many people simply assume "greed = keep chasing longs," which is a typical trading misconception. A greed reading only indicates that sentiment has not yet cleared and does not mean that the price still has upward momentum, especially when a coin has already weakened ahead of the broader market; sentiment and price often diverge.
Looking at $XRP current structure: current price 1.3841, 24h down 2.65%, MA5=1.38218 has crossed below MA20=1.41068, short-term moving average turning down as resistance; RSI=40.7 is weak but not oversold, MACD histogram -0.005789 remains bearish, Bollinger lower band 1.36575 is the recent support. The market sentiment is greedy while XRP is weakening alone, indicating capital rotation within the sector without replenishing this asset. Funding rate +0.0100% is still positive, bulls are still paying to hold positions. This "hot sentiment, cold coin" combination usually means rebounds are easily absorbed by selling pressure.
Directionally, I lean towards bearish after a rebound: entry reference 1.398–1.412 (near MA20 and Bollinger middle band resistance, also a previous dense trading area), take profit 1 at 1.366 (Bollinger lower band support), take profit 2 at 1.345 (extension after breaking lower band), stop loss set at 1.428 (if price effectively stands above MA20, the bearish logic fails).After whales sold off $2.7 billion worth of Bitcoin, they did not exit the market but partially shifted to Ethereum, indicating that smart money is reallocating rather than retreating. Low liquidity assets like ONE are more easily swept along by liquidation cascades.
The current price of ONEUSDT is 0.003890. The market has already broken below multiple moving averages, MACD shows a bearish crossover downward, and RSI has entered the oversold zone. CoinGlass shows a large accumulation of long liquidations around 0.0040. This level was originally support, but the current price is now below it. If the rebound cannot retake 0.0040, it will become a resistance level where bears continue to exert pressure. I just parked the car by the roadside and glanced at the liquidation heatmap; the order density between 0.0040 and 0.0041 is very high.
The strategy is mainly to short on rebounds. Entry range is 0.00395 to 0.00405, stop loss at 0.00418, first take profit at 0.00370, second take profit at 0.00355. If volume pushes the price back above 0.00415, close short positions unconditionally and do not go long.
$ONE
#美联储10月再加息概率破55%
@OKX星球 In the time it takes to drink a cup of coffee, $ZEC has given back a portion of its 215% monthly gain.
This trade opened a short position at the peak of 1535.32, current price is 1452.52, with an unrealized profit of 269.65%. The logic is straightforward: the daily RSI soared to 87, indicating severe overbought conditions; volume did not keep up during the rally, a classic volume-price divergence; on the 15-minute chart, MACD formed a high-level death cross, KDJ turned down from the overbought zone, and a long upper shadow appeared, signaling a loss of bullish momentum.
$ONE
How to enter and exit? Set stop loss at 1590; if it breaks the previous high, admit the mistake and exit without holding the position; take profit in two stages—reduce half at 1452, the first support broken, and the rest at 1380; only if it breaks 1300 does the trend truly weaken. 50x leverage is a double-edged sword: a 5% drop is magnified to nearly 270%, but it also means the margin for error is only 2%, so only light positions are used. This is not showing off wealth, but a lesson learned: no matter how good the unrealized profit looks, money only counts when it’s in your pocket. $AKE #ZEC高位震荡，多空仓位开始分化 Today's market looks a bit like a collective sell-off after good news was realized.
$BTC fell back from around 82,000 to 80,500, $ETH dropped from 2,672 to 2,574, and $ZEC was even more dramatic, plunging directly from 1,595 to 1,440, nearly a 10% drop in one day. OKB also fell from 123 down to 115.9, several coins dropping together.
Why is it so weak specifically on the weekend?
Because the rate hike has been in effect for three days, and all the expected gains have already happened. Weekend liquidity is poor, big funds have no time to push the market up, and small funds selling off cause prices to fall.
So the market is actually waiting for one thing:
The PCE data at the end of the month.
This data will determine whether there will be another rate hike in October. If the PCE cools down and rate hike expectations decrease, the coins that dropped today could very likely see a second wave of rebound.
But if the PCE exceeds expectations again, and the October rate hike expectations rise back up, this current rebound might end immediately.
Right now, I'm focusing on three levels:
BTC 80,000 → Can it hold?
ETH 2,600 → Can it recover back above?
ZEC 1,400 → After falling, can it hold?
This time, I don't want to guess the direction.
Because the real big event preview starts with the PCE at the end of the month.
#BTC维持8万美元，加密市场修复扩散
#美联储10月再加息概率破55% 🔥🚨🧨 $ZEC finally crashed after several days of continuous rise! On the contrary, I feel this is the first proper "checkup" of this short squeeze rally.
🐋💰⚠️ The biggest scoop is still Garrett Jin: According to on-chain monitoring, he previously sold 35,000 ETH, cashing out about $87.5 million to cover ZEC short position margin, pushing the liquidation price from $2,631 up to $4,738; his ZEC short position unrealized loss has exceeded $33 million.
📉🐳💥 More importantly, on September 19, a whale who held a short position for half a month closed about $24.43 million worth of ZEC shorts near $1,548, losing about $10.68 million. On the other side, a giant whale address also transferred about $363 million worth of ZEC, including $15 million transferred to Coinbase for the first time.
🧠⚠️📊 Putting these signals together, at least one thing is clear: the strongest phase of the previous short squeeze is starting to see profit-taking, short capitulation, and chip transfer. As for whether this is the top, it’s still too early to conclude.
🚫📈👀 So I definitely won’t chase this wave. It has more than doubled in 30 days, and after the first decent pullback, it’s better to watch for support rather than rush to bottom-fish.
💰🛡️🔍 If you hold ZEC, will you choose to keep holding, reduce your position to lock in profits, or wait for a pullback confirmation before deciding? #ZEC高位震荡，多空仓位开始分化 🏢 Corporate treasuries just went quiet on Bitcoin
Listed companies added only 5K BTC over the past three months
Back in July 2025 alone, they bought 89K
That's a fraction of the pace, and it's the kind of shift that doesn't show up in the price right away
The treasury bid was one of the steadiest sources of demand through the last cycle — if it's cooling, the question is who picks up the slack$XAUT holder count fell on Ethereum, but that alone doesn’t prove 5,000 investors exited. XAUT is multi-chain, and wallet consolidation or tiny-balance cleanup can distort address counts. With physical-gold backing and ~$2.7B market cap, supply, reserves, and cross-chain data matter more than one-chain holders. $XAUT $ZAMA sideways at this position—is it playing a bear trap?
All the dip I caught last night has been fully recovered.
Not sure if this trade can still survive.
I suddenly realized its movement is very similar to $ONE.
Both pulled up without an immediate crash,
instead consolidating sideways at a high level.
In this situation, short positions are very risky.
It’s very likely a bear trap.
Anyway, set a stop loss at 0.093 first.
This is no longer a time to short blindly.
#BTC维持8万美元，加密市场修复扩散
#SEC代币化股票创新豁免落地，UNI盘中涨超21%
#ZEC高位震荡，多空仓位开始分化 Japan raises interest rates to a 31-year high, is global liquidity about to change?
The Bank of Japan has pushed rates up to 1.25%, the highest in 31 years. Don’t underestimate this 25 basis point hike; Japan is one of the world’s largest sources of “cheap money.” The cost of borrowing in yen is starting to rise, and what really needs recalculating are global leverage and arbitrage funds.
The market wasn’t directly scared this time. $BTC actually climbed back above $80,000, with Bitcoin ETFs seeing a single-day net inflow of $433 million on September 18, and SOL ETFs maintaining inflows for 12 consecutive weeks. This indicates that funds haven’t massively withdrawn yet; instead, some are rushing to get ahead.
What concerns me more is the second half. The rate hike itself was already priced in by the market; the real danger is the yen continuing to strengthen and arbitrage trades being forced to unwind. The yen arbitrage sell-off in 2024, when BTC dropped over 16% in a week, serves as a warning.
Right now, the market is trading the liquidity inflection point, not just these 25 basis points. If the yen keeps rising and Japanese bond yields keep surging, yet BTC remains stable, that would be truly strong; conversely, if arbitrage funds start pulling out, today’s rebound might just be the last gasp.Season 1: Introduction and Survival | Course Progress 09/10
First withdrawal, many people get stuck at this step: You chose USDT as the coin, copied the address, so why do you still need to select a network?
Take another look, the fees for different options are also different.
"Then just pick the cheaper one?"
Hold on.
If the recipient doesn't support it, no matter how cheap, you can't just pick it randomly.
1. Same name doesn't mean it's the same blockchain
USDT can exist on different blockchains. Having the same name doesn't mean balances on different networks automatically interconnect.
You can think of it like sending the same item, but you need to confirm which transportation route the recipient can accept. Normal transfers won't automatically cross chains for you.
So, the correct order is not to pick the fee first, but to first open the recipient's deposit or receiving page, see which coin and network it supports, then select the corresponding option on the sending side.
If the receiving page only supports "USDT + Network A," you can't switch to Network B just because it's cheaper.
If both sides don't have a commonly supported network, stop first. Don't try to transfer and expect the system to automatically switch.
Another common mistake: some networks have the same address format, and even the same person's address characters might be identical. Just because you can paste the address doesn't mean the receiving platform supports that chain.
2. Why does the wallet have USDT but still prompt insufficient fees?
Because the coin you want to transfer and the coin used to pay network fees are not necessarily the same.
For example, on the Ethereum mainnet, when using a regular self-custody wallet to transfer USDT, the usual...Robinhood Chain Fees Decline, DEX Weekly Trading Volume Increases by 5%
Robinhood Chain's fee revenue quickly dropped after peaking, but trading did not decline accordingly. For the week ending September 16, its DEX trading volume was about $12.8 billion, a 5% week-over-week increase; stablecoin supply only decreased by 1%.
More noticeable changes occurred in cost and traffic distribution: the network's average fee per transaction fell from a high of about $0.64 in early September to $0.026. During the same period, the early hype-driving token issuance platform Pons saw its weekly trading volume drop 37%, while Uniswap V3's volume rose from $2.5 billion to $5.3 billion.
This suggests that trading activity shifted from high-fee token issuance scenarios to mainstream DEXs, rather than the entire chain suddenly cooling down. For users, the chain remains busy, but usage costs have clearly decreased.
#Robinhood #DeFiETH Market Analysis for the Morning of September 20
In the orange box range on the 1-hour chart, the core change in today's market is that after a wave of rally, it has entered a high-level consolidation structure. The previously rising channel with progressively higher lows has temporarily slowed down. The candlesticks no longer continuously form long bullish bars but instead show a pattern of surging and retreating, repeatedly sweeping the market. This indicates a rotation of short-term bullish and bearish forces. The previous one-sided bullish push has shifted to a game of high-level chip exchange. The price continuously tests the upper resistance, but each surge's upward amplitude gradually narrows. Although the CVD remains in a high-level range, it no longer synchronously refreshes highs with the price, indicating that new active buying has weakened and there is no longer sustained incremental capital entering the market. Compared to the previous main rising phase, when the CVD continuously rose during the rally and buying was constant, the current flat CVD shows capital shifting from active offense to cautious turnover. During the rally phase, positions accumulated continuously, and during the high-level consolidation, the open interest (OI) remains high without rapid shrinkage. Both bulls and bears continue to place orders and compete. Long-term bulls are taking profits, and bears are attempting to enter and test resistance, forming a capital standoff. If the price breaks above the upper boundary of the consolidation again, with the CVD simultaneously reaching new highs and OI continuing to rise, it indicates the bulls are returning and the original uptrend will continue. If after surging the price fails to break through, the CVD gradually turns downward and OI quickly declines, it means bulls are collectively taking profits and exiting, and the high-level structure risks a pullback. To maintain the bullish structure, the pullback must not break the lower support of the consolidation, and the CVD must not continue to decline. Once this support is effectively broken, this upward structure phase ends temporarily, and the market enters a wave correction.📈📈 Don’t stack $BTC , $ETH , $CORE, and $ZEC and call it four different trades.
🔥 That can still be one risk-on position wearing four different tickers.
If the dollar squeezes and crypto sells off, correlation can hit all four at once.
Diversification isn’t about counting assets.
Cut the correlation, or cut the size.A major Middle Eastern player just stood up and left the table in Beijing.
That's the scene.
Saudi Arabia has withdrawn from mBridge, which, to put it simply, is a project where several central banks come together to use blockchain to conduct cross-border transactions directly with their own digital currencies, without the US dollar as an intermediary.
The time is shorter, the cost is lower, and the US dollar's intermediary role fades.
So the US has been closely watching this, and there's a reason for that.
What I admire is this: this thing hasn't even been officially commercialized yet, and it's already making the Americans uneasy.
It shows the direction hits a nerve.
But Saudi Arabia's departure also indicates another thing: the players at the table each have their own calculations; it's not a solid bloc.
As for the market? The short-term impact is basically none; this is a central bank-level matter, several layers away from the coin price.
What’s really worth watching is, after commercialization, how many countries will still be willing to join the table.
Do you think this is a temporary exit, or is there another plan?
#美联储10月再加息概率破55%
#全球高利率预期再升温 #长端美债5%会成新常态吗？ $ZEC Weekend altcoin drama continues: AKE is not just about price surge news, it's about chip structure news.
On-chain (Yu Jin/Chaincatcher 09-20 08:47): After a short-term price surge of +115%, it is suspected that an active market maker withdrew 216 million AKE from Binance Alpha, worth about $13.83 million. This entity currently holds at least 12.4 billion AKE on-chain, valued at about $803 million, accounting for over 54% of the circulating supply. Yu Jin also speculates that AKE and the previously rising B2 might be operated by the same active market maker.
Adding another time bomb layer: RootData shows that AKEDO (AKE) will unlock about 21.3079 million tokens at 0:00 Beijing time on September 21, worth about $31.51 million—less than a day away.
Market side: CoinGecko AKE ≈ $0.072, 24h about +24%, trading volume about $140 million, ranking high on the trend list. The market cap BTC ≈ 80307, ETH ≈ 2574, F&G still at 71 greed—sentiment is not cold, but the main line is "who controls the supply, who is pushing."
Trader perspective: 54% circulation concentration + Alpha withdrawal + imminent large unlock, this is a typical high-volatility speculative game, not a fundamentally confirmed market. Suitable for watching sell pressure and buy-in depth, not for treating short-term surges as trend signals. No calls, no promised returns. *Bitcoin Latest Chinese September 20*
*Price $80,350* (-0.89%)
1. *Rebound Reason:* Surged 6% on the 18th to $81,951, market digested Fed rate hike + CLARITY Act setback, ETF inflow $325 million
2. *Major Risk:* 10-year US Treasury at 5% + Japanese rate hike triggered yen carry trade unwind, which caused BTC to drop 15% in one day on August 5
3. *Key Levels:* Support $78K - $76K, Resistance $82K - $83K, USD/JPY broke below 140, if $78K fails to hold
*In short: ETFs have bought back, but the yen rate hike is the hidden factor.*$STRK STRK I do swing trading back and forth, consistently making small profits. The L2 sector is a mainstream narrative, but the competition within the sector is intense, with multiple layer-2 projects competing against each other and tokens continuously unlocking. Positive news is often priced in early by the market, making it difficult to see an unexpectedly strong rally. Swing trading is the only viable strategy; it's not suitable for long-term holding. A small number of institutions hold base positions, while large holders are mainly early airdrop and private sale users who choose to cash out upon unlocking. Project development progress and unlocking schedules are public, and staked tokens are used for network validation, with unlocked tokens continuously released. In the next two to three days, the sector will follow the rotation and oscillation of the layer-2 segment, with gains and losses relatively balanced. When the sector rallies, there are rebound opportunities; when it cools down, it will face pressure. When trading STRK, don't overthink the big picture—take profits at resistance levels and buy the dip at support levels. Layer-2 projects generally face selling pressure from unlocking tokens, making it difficult to sustain a one-sided strong rally. Swing trading is the most suitable approach. $PONS The market is like this: the more impatient you are, the more it grinds you down, only moving when you give up on it. While everyone else is still watching, I held onto the short position, and looking back now, it was worth it.
Every time PONS tries to surge, it falls just short, with clear resistance above and insufficient support. I saw the volume was off and warned not to chase the rally; the rebound was a shorting opportunity, bearish.
From 0.5999 down to 0.5875, the short position gained +42%, those in the trade should be waking up smiling. The earlier hesitation was real, but the outcome is truly sweet.
First, close 80%, keep the remaining 20% at cost price as protection, let the profits run on further drops, and don’t give back profits on the rebound.
Risk control done upfront is called rational; cutting losses after losing is called decisive. Now is not the time to rush; wait for a new structure to emerge, and I will alert immediately. The market is not short of opportunities, it’s short of patience.
$BTC $LAB $HYPE HYPE In this round of super speculative coin market, I watched the whole process without daring to enter. I know some people made big money, but high-level speculative coins carry huge risks, and I don't want to participate in the tail-end market. Big players have tight control, simultaneously pumping and distributing, turnover rate exploding, funds clustering in a final frenzy. No legitimate project team, no staking, no grounded ecosystem, purely fund-driven speculation. Sudden limit-up or limit-down crashes can happen anytime; once funds collectively withdraw, there is no support on the market. In the next two or three days, a crash can happen anytime; this is a high-risk speculative coin. Although speculative coins show continuous surges, timing the entry is very difficult; if you're slightly late, you'll be stuck at a high position. I've seen too many speculative coins plunge more than half in a single day, no matter how much they rose before, the crash won't give you a chance to escape. This kind of asset is only suitable for a very few top-level short-term traders; ordinary traders should not rush in. ZEC 1452, sharp pullback but no break, if 1435 holds I will buy more
At posting time ZEC: 1452.09
Conclusion:
If 1435–1452 holds, buy more. Stop loss at 1410, target 1500 → 1595.
Only consider 1700+ if 1595 is surpassed, otherwise it’s just high-level consolidation.
If 1410 breaks, do not buy, wait for 1350–1360.
Market situation:
• Pulled from 1041 to 1595, a 53% increase, now retracing to 1452 is normal profit-taking
• 24H low of 1435 not broken, bulls still holding
• 1595 tested three times without breaking, short-term resistance clear; 1500 is the first hurdle for a rebound
• 7-day +27.86%, 30-day +141.68%, trend intact, just a sharp rise needing consolidation
My actions:
• Spot: place limit buy orders between 1435–1452, do not chase market price
• Futures: buy 3x at 1440, exit if 1410 breaks; reduce position by half at 1500, clear at failure to break 1595
• Chase 2x on breakout above 1595, exit if it falls back below 1550
• Trades not taken: chasing long at 1452, bottom fishing on break at 1410, shorting without confirmation at 1595
If 1410 breaks, accept loss, no averaging down.
$ZEC I was just about to go to the forum to rant, but then I checked my balance and decided against it. The market daddy is always right.
$FET perpetual contract 20x short, opened at 0.1785, dropped steadily to 0.1695, floating profit 100.84%.
$PROS short position entered around 0.5571, current price slowly declined to 0.4889, floating profit 243.76%.
In the early session when the market was just crashing, PROS looked like it might rebound, but the volume didn’t keep up at all. Every rally fell short, a typical weak rebound. I watched it closely near 0.5571 and didn’t hesitate, shorted as planned, betting it wouldn’t bounce.
It really gave me face, dropping steadily from 0.5571 to 0.4889, now floating profit +243.76%. This move was smooth as silk, the guys on the ride must be waking up laughing.
Operationally, I first closed 70% to secure profits, don’t let paper gains turn into a roller coaster; the remaining 30% stop loss was raised near the cost price for protection. If it rebounds past that, I’ll exit first; if it continues to drop, let the profits run.
Being out of position isn’t a sin, reckless opening of positions is the mistake. Risk control done upfront is called rational; cutting losses after losing is called decisive.
Now is not the time to chase shorts, the more it falls, the more you have to guard against rebounds. I’ll call out the next comfortable entry point immediately. There are still opportunities, hold on patiently. $ZEC $ETH #BTC维持8万美元，加密市场修复扩散 🔥 After BTC's sharp drop, what really matters is not how much it dropped, but how leverage is changing.
📉 $BTC Quickly retreated from around 81,900 to around 80,800, followed by a correction. Recent macro pressures such as Fed rate hikes and rising yields remain, but after BTC regained the $80,000 mark, the market has shifted from panic to seeking a new balance.
⚔️ **The most important thing to watch now is derivatives. **When prices fluctuate sharply, open interest does not collapse simultaneously, indicating that the divergence between bulls and bears remains significant; At the same time, the latest derivatives data also show signs of cooling leverage.
🧠 So this stage is more like a "macro quiet period" after deleveraging: a sharp drop releases some panic, but the real direction still requires new volume and price coordination.
🎯 In the short term, watch whether the 80,800 level can hold steady; above that, watch the 81,500–81,900 resistance zone. The biggest taboo now is letting emotions get carried away, chasing gains and selling losses, getting hit on both sides.
💰 My approach: For spot trading, you can patiently wait, control leverage in contracts, and keep your bullets ready. Wait for the market to chart the direction, then follow it—don't rush for answers.
Guys, do you think this wave will continue to rise after washing leverage, or will it slash again? 👇
The above are personal market views and do not constitute investment advice. #BTC维持8万美元, the crypto market is recovering and spreading $FIL perpetual 50x long position, opened at 0.7387, now at 0.9502, floating profit +1431.56%.
Filecoin is transforming into Onchain Cloud (AI/enterprise storage) + PDP hot storage + F3 fast finality. October unlock cliff (early investors' unlock ends, daily selling pressure reduced by ~60%). Solstice proposal (FIP-0118) will redirect rewards towards real paid demand.
Long at 0.7387, very light position.
Move stop loss up to 0.85 breakeven. Watching resistance at 1.00.
⚠️ Risk: No maximum supply cap (perpetual inflation), ~60% non-circulating selling pressure at the top, internal addresses controlling the market (PL/FF hold ~20%), actual revenue very low (Filecoin Pay annualized only tens of thousands). 50x leverage is extremely risky, +1431% floating profit, take profit immediately or push stop loss to save your position. $ZEC $AKE ETH has dropped to 2574, this Sunday market is really frustrating
Just opened the app to take a look, ETH current price is 2574, down another 2.5% in 24 hours. Weekend liquidity is naturally poor, the loudest voices in the group are quiet today, probably all out having fun, only I am still here watching the market 😂
Here’s my take: this drop is mainly dragged down by BTC, which is hovering around 80,000, so ETH has even less strength. The 2570 level is quite critical; below 2550 is my short-term support focus, if it really breaks, it might test 2500; above 2650–2700 is still a resistance zone, without volume it’s hard to break through in one go.
I personally haven’t moved, still holding my base position, will add in batches if it drops sharply, but won’t go all in now. It’s Sunday, less trading means fewer mistakes, will wait for Monday to see how the US stock market and capital flows go before deciding
$BTC $ETH $SOL 🔥 This wave of high-level consolidation for ZEC is finally starting to give answers?
📉 Yesterday $ZEC fluctuated repeatedly around 1600, then quickly dropped. On September 19, the highest point nearly reached 1595, and the lowest retraced to around 1435, with very large volatility.
⚠️ Currently, watch 1520 as the short-term dividing line. If support fails, the retracement space will continue to open, with the next focus on 1420–1400; if this area also can't hold, then look near 1300.
🧠 But one thing must be made clear here: the pullback after a continuous surge looks more like a normal cooldown after being overbought at a high level. As long as the mid-term structure is not broken, we cannot declare the trend over just because of one big bearish candle.
🚫 So my thinking is very clear: **Don't rush to bottom-fish now, and definitely don't heavily buy just because of the drop.** Wait for the price to truly stop falling and the structure to be confirmed before considering the next step.
Brothers, do you think ZEC will first return to 1400, or will it drop another wave? 👇
The above is only my personal market view and does not constitute investment advice. #ZEC高位震荡，多空仓位开始分化