Orbit Post Sitemap
#美联储周四凌晨公布利率决议
Federal Reserve Meeting: The real test for BTC is not whether rates will be cut, but how the market interprets the "future"
The recent $BTC rally is essentially not because rate cuts have already happened, but because the market is trading ahead on "rate cut expectations."
The market is betting on: inflation continuing to decline → Fed policy shift → liquidity improvement → risk assets benefiting.
But the question arises: if the Fed signals dovishness, can BTC continue to rise?
Or will the classic Wall Street script play out again: buy the rumor, sell the fact.
Why is capital positioning ahead of time?
First, the macro environment is changing.
If future CPI continues to fall, the job market cools, and economic pressure increases, the necessity for the Fed to maintain high rates will decrease.
The market never waits for policy to be implemented before acting; it prices in the future in advance.
Second, capital is looking for new outlets.
This year, AI and some US stock assets have surged, increasing valuation pressure.
Institutional funds are starting to seek new high-elasticity directions:
BTC, ETH, crypto-related assets.
So this BTC rally is not just driven by crypto community sentiment.
More importantly: global capital is betting ahead on liquidity improvement.
Third, ETFs have changed the BTC game rules.
Previously, BTC rallies were driven by retail sentiment.
Now, BTC rallies are more about institutional capital.
What truly determines the trend is: whether ETFs keep buying;
whether institutions continue allocating;
and whether long-term capital accepts the current price.
Current BTC advantages:
✅ ETF funds provide institutional buying
✅ Rate cut expectations are fermenting ahead
✅ US stock risk appetite still exists
✅ Institutional allocation logic is strengthening
But risks are also clear:
⚠️ Some positive factors are already priced in
⚠️ BTC is approaching key resistance areas
⚠️ Post-meeting, capital may take profits
My view:
Before the meeting, BTC will likely maintain a strong oscillating trend; after the meeting, the focus is not on what Powell says, but on how capital moves.
If after positive news capital stops buying, the "buy the rumor, sell the fact" script may play out again.
Ultimately, what decides BTC’s direction is never a single speech: the Fed creates expectations, capital decides the trend.USDC itself has no technical barriers; it's just 1:1 collateral issuance, and anyone can do it.
Visa and Stripe have pulled over a hundred companies to launch OpenUSD, Circle's stock price has plummeted by 13%, and its product moat has basically disappeared.
Now, instead of optimizing its products, it has spent money hoarding nearly a thousand blockchain patents, trying to use legal patents to choke others.
Not relying on product competition but on patents to set thresholds, this company really has little to offer in the long run. #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard This week, the US stock market experienced intense structural divergence overnight, with limited volatility in the main index, but global chip and AI technology sectors collectively suffered heavy setbacks, with a sudden "chip storm" sweeping across the market. The Philadelphia semiconductor index plunged nearly 5% intraday, but still closed down 2.23%. All segment leaders plunged: Nvidia plunged 4.99%, SanDisk plunged 11.02%, SK Hynix dropped over 7%, AMD plunged 5.17%, and even global lithography machine leader ASML plunged 5.8%. Sentiment in the global semiconductor sector cooled instantly. Regarding this collective drop in tech chips, Goldman Sachs top trader John Flood gave the most precise core tone: this round of adjustment is not a collapse of fundamentals, but rather a combination of multiple negative windows, doubts about AI capital spending logic, rising credit risks, and capital aversion and position reduction, all triggering sentiment and valuation restructuring. First, major risk events have arrived in clusters, and the market has entered an extreme wait-and-see cycle. This Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will hold its policy meeting without a preset policy path, with the market's probability of a rate hike as high as 35%, significantly increasing liquidity uncertainty. Meanwhile, Meta and Microsoft released earnings after the market closed on Wednesday, followed by Apple and Amazon making a grand entrance on Thursday. Before the intensive release of major tech earnings reports, funds generally chose to lock up positions to hedge risks, and their desire to go long completely faded. Capital behavior is highly divided: hedge funds continue to reduce their tech exposure and actively sell off to lower risk, while pure long institutions remain on the sidelines, with almost no new buying orders in the market. Second, the years of AI circular financing frenzy seem to be reaching a peak phase. Previously7.28 BTC and ETH Market Analysis 📉
BTC is currently fluctuating within a range, with each upward test failing to generate sustained buying pressure. During the upward phase, momentum is insufficient and it cannot hold the resistance level above. The bulls have attacked multiple times but have all come under pressure and pulled back, with the rebound high declining and making a strong reversal 📊 unlikely in the short term
Technically, BTC and ETH continue to run within the middle and lower Bollinger Bands, with the moving average system continuously diverging downward to suppress the market. The market clearly shows weak buying strength, making it difficult to maintain volume during rebounds, and every time the resistance zone is touched, it is met with selling pressure. The current low-level sideways movement is just a temporary pause for sellers, and there have not yet been signs 🛑 of a reversal of massive bottom-fishing by capital
On the news front, the market is awaiting the Federal Reserve's rate decision, with most concerns that the tone of their statements will lean toward tightening and continue to pressure risk assets. With geopolitical risk aversion cooling and a lack of strong positive factors driving crypto prices higher, the market is unlikely to sustain a sustained rebound in the short term. Overall, the trading strategy maintains a bearish 🎯 outlook following the trend
BTC has direct short opportunities in the 63,800-64,500 range, targeting 62,800; if it falls below this, it could reach 61,500; ETH can also be shorted in the 1900-1920 area, with a target at 1840; if it breaks further, watch the 1800 level 📉
$BTC $ETHSK Hynix intraday fell more than 13% today, with the stock price dropping to around 1,570,000 KRW at its lowest. Samsung, Kioxia, and other memory stocks also plunged simultaneously, with the KOSPI index dropping over 7% intraday, triggering a circuit breaker. Clearly, this exceeds the normal pre-earnings volatility of a single company and is closer to a concentrated de-risking in the semiconductor sector.
Today's decline can roughly be broken down into four factors.
1. SK Hynix's US ADR fell to $143.02 last night, breaking below its $149 issue price for the first time. The liquidity and valuation premium originally brought by the US listing have started to become a source of sentiment pressure.
2. The market is beginning to reassess the sustainability of AI infrastructure investments. Previously, it was assumed that demand for computing power, HBM, and server memory would grow rapidly over the long term. Now, capital is considering the return on capital expenditures, financing scale, and the possibility of slowing demand growth.
3. The listing of ChangXin Memory and progress in China's semiconductor equipment have amplified market concerns about DRAM supply expansion. While ChangXin is unlikely to directly challenge SK Hynix's high-end HBM business in the short term, the capital market is pricing in the competitive landscape for the next two to three years in advance.
4. Proactive position reduction ahead of earnings. SK Hynix will announce its Q2 results on the morning of July 29. There are differing views in the market regarding the progress of HBM4, ASP, and subsequent capacity guidance, so capital is choosing to sell first and wait for answers.
Therefore, today's decline includes both changes in fundamental expectations and liquidity-driven sell-offs with rapid valuation compression.
From a fundamental perspective, there is currently no evidence that HBM demand has reversed. In Q1, SK Hynix reported revenue of 52.58 trillion KRW and operating profit of 37.61 trillion KRW, with profits still at historically high levels. What really needs confirmation is whether earnings expectations for the coming quarters can continue to be raised.
At the current price, I am more inclined to believe that SK Hynix's earnings distribution over the next 12 months has begun to tilt positively.
This should not be simply understood as the stock having no downside. Further declines could come from two directions:
One is continued liquidity-driven sell-offs, with foreign capital, financing positions, and leveraged products forced to reduce holdings;
The other, more importantly, is that earnings guidance or the earnings call could lead to further downward revisions of profit expectations for 2026–2027.
Liquidity selling pressure will eventually gradually exhaust, but downward revisions to earnings expectations will continue to push valuation anchors lower. These two types of declines must be distinguished.
Key indicators to watch next:
Whether HBM4 is mass-produced as planned, and whether yield and customer certifications are delayed; whether HBM prices and order visibility can be sustained through 2027; ASP guidance for standard DRAM and NAND; whether new capital expenditures might cause supply oversupply; and whether AI capital spending by major tech companies is slowing.
In terms of price movement, 1,570,000–1,600,000 KRW is the first observation zone formed today. After earnings confirm fundamentals, the stock price retaking 1,660,000–1,700,000 KRW would be an initial sign of a bottom; further reclaiming around 1,800,000 KRW would indicate that this round of sell-off has basically been repaired.
Strong earnings and guidance could trigger an oversold rebound; strong results but cautious guidance are more likely to lead to wide-range consolidation; if HBM or ASP guidance falls below expectations, the market will continue to lower valuations.
At today's price, the question is whether the market is trading short-term liquidity-driven sell-offs or has already started to price in a peak in future profitability for the memory industry. Tomorrow's earnings report and earnings call will provide the first round of answers.
$SKHYNIX Trading volume has dropped to the bottom of the bear market! The biggest hidden danger on the market has surfaced at present
Many people watch the price every day and trade back and forth, ignoring the most crucial underlying signal: Bitcoin spot trading volume has fallen back to its lowest point since the end of the 2023 bear market.
Many traders have recently experienced this: the market has been repeatedly bouncing sideways, and the market is especially exhausting. The essence is the continuous absence of incremental funds.
The latest statistics clearly show that the Bitcoin spot trading volume on mainstream platforms has shrunk by more than 75% compared to its peak at the end of last year. Take leading exchanges as an example: at its peak, monthly spot trading volume reached $246 billion, but now it's down to just $35 billion, with all major platforms experiencing simultaneous contraction in the market. The market has been this quiet, and the last time it appeared was at the bottom of the long bear market in 2023.
The reluctance of funds to enter the market is the result of multiple layers of pressure. Geopolitical tensions continue to disturb the market, constantly suppressing market risk appetite; Inflation data fluctuates repeatedly, and the market remains concerned that interest rates will remain high for a long time, which is unfriendly to risk assets. Meanwhile, the tech sector of the US stock market continues to siphon global liquidity, with a large amount of capital choosing to stay in the stock market and delaying flows into the crypto market. The narrative of market enthusiasm for tech stocks began to crack in July.
Let me share my real feelings: shrinking volume alone cannot directly determine whether the market will rise or fall.
Looking back at past markets, long-term shrinking volume fluctuations are often the prelude to major market moves, but no one can predict the direction in advance. This environment is the easiest to foster false breakouts, with repeated sweeps and losses to cut losses.
At this stage, I won't be actively heavily invested in the game direction; I prefer to stay light and observe. Before trading volume recovers effectively, the sustainability of any one-sided market will be greatly reduced, and frequent back-and-forth operations can easily erode your principal.
Do you think the continued shrinking volume is a buildup before an uptrend, or a sign of a downturn?Rebound ≠ reversal, $ETH surged 4%, $QQQ was dazzlingly green, and the market was waiting—whoever showed weakness first would set today's tone.
Look at the numbers
$BTC 65,283 +1.45% $ETH 1,952 +4.14%
$QQQ -1.12% $SPY +0.10% $IBIT -0.82%
$DXY -0.15% $GLD +0.10%
Hormuz and crude oil are still adding variables to inflation expectations, while the shadow of US Treasury yields and Fed tightening continues to weigh on valuations. The dollar is not a backdrop; a simple adjustment of the exchange rate line can disrupt the rhythm of $QQQ$SPY. Today, it's not surprising if any switch gets touched on this plate.
$ETH is clearly more elastic than $BTC, short-term risk appetite is rising, but $QQQ is sinking downward, and money is shrinking into defense. $IBIT Weaker than spot $BTC, a weakness in ETFs means the spot market isn't that strong; $DXY Only when risk assets can breathe a sigh of relief can they catch their breath, but once tightened, they quickly turn hostile; $GLD Still quietly rising, haven't fully withdrawn safe-haven funds, don't be fooled by the surface buzz.From July 28 to 29 Eastern Time, the Federal Reserve will hold the FOMC meeting, and the interest rate decision will be announced at 2 a.m. Beijing Time on July 30.
This meeting is particularly noteworthy for two main reasons:
On one hand, due to the turmoil in the Middle East, oil prices have risen significantly recently, increasing the risk of inflation rebound; on the other hand, this is the first truly policy-uncertain meeting since Waller took office as Fed Chair. The market focus has shifted from the traditional "whether to raise rates" to a deeper question—how Waller will balance the policy framework he advocates with the pressure from the market.
From current market pricing:
OIS (Overnight Index Swap) implies about a 10bp rate hike expectation for the July meeting;
Since the Fed entered the "quiet period" before the meeting, WTI crude oil has risen cumulatively by more than 10%;
Due to the lack of official guidance, the market is almost "flying blind."
Whichever path is chosen, Waller faces significant challenges.
If he holds steady, the market may interpret it as: even though Waller loudly claims that monetary policy has entered a "sea change" new framework, the Fed is actually continuing the old path of "only surprising the market in directional choices," which would undermine the credibility of his framework commitment. More troublingly, medium-term inflation expectations are accelerating upward—this month, both the 5Y5Y forward and 1Y1Y forward inflation swap rates have risen significantly. Maintaining rates at this time would call into question the Fed's long-standing "inflation anchoring" credibility.
If he chooses to raise rates, it may be interpreted as Waller succumbing to market "pressure," contradicting his previously advocated analytical framework of "penetrating supply-side shocks," thereby triggering a hawkish repricing of terminal rates and policy path.
Despite the dilemma, I still tend to believe this meeting is more likely to choose a rate hike (or no hike but hawkish remarks), mainly based on the following three points:
First, businesses tend to quickly pass on cost increases to downstream consumers when oil prices rise, but when oil prices fall, they do not necessarily lower end prices accordingly. For example, the jump in airline ticket prices at the start of the Middle East conflict is unlikely to fully reverse in the short term, which will continue to exert upward pressure on core inflation.
Second, the Brent crude oil price range of $80–100 per barrel is precisely the "most hawkish" price range for the Fed. The impact at this price level is strong enough to pose a significant upside risk to core inflation, yet insufficient to cause a substantial weakening in the labor market. This means the Fed's policy reaction function will be more clearly tilted toward fighting inflation.
Third, Waller personally has a clear strategic motive to tighten proactively. On one hand, a proactive rate hike can sharply distinguish his policy style from predecessor Powell’s, highlighting his personal governance characteristics; on the other hand, as long as inflation falls in the future—even if mainly due to base effects or other mechanical factors—it can be credited to the tightening decisions under his leadership, thereby consolidating his personal policy reputation.
In summary, the probability of a hawkish FOMC meeting is very high. Coupled with the current BTC rebound losing momentum, BTC faces a significant risk of decline.
#美联储周四凌晨公布利率决议 $BTC ### In a word
An hour ago, trading volume narrowed from -97.5% to -89.2% (as of 16:00). I almost thought the market was about to wake up. As a result, this round's -96.3% seems to say: overthinking it.
### Core Data
| Indicator | Numerical | Change |
|------|------|------|
| BTC | $63,463.98 | -2.52% 24h |
| Trading volume | -96.3% | From -89.2%, it has deteriorated again
| F&G | 29 Fear | Unchanged (N hour has passed) |
| Funding rate | +0.0007% | Neutral |
| OI | 106,000 BTC | Almost no change |
| Price-to-Fall Ratio | 2/15 | 13 stocks declined |
### The two most explosive stats
**1. AEON：+81.3% → +99.3%**
The last time it saw AEON, it had "only" risen 84.5%, dropped to 81.3% (slightly cooled) 1.5 hours ago, and now it has surged to +99.3%. Nearly doubled. In a market where BTC fell 2.5% and 13 out of 15 coins were all selling out, a micro-cap coin nearly doubled.
This is not a fundamental-driven market—no positive news from AEON, no protocol upgrades, no large unlocks. This is the "lowest denominator game" of panic funds: when liquidity runs dry, funds can only push the lightest plate. When only one out of 15 coins is surging while the rest are all green, this is not due to strong coin selection—it is an extreme portrayal of a liquidity dilemma.
**2. Trading volume: -89.2% → -96.3%**
The data at 16:00 made many people (myself included) feel that trading volume is bottoming out and rebounding. It turns out that is just data noise, not a trend reversal. Within an hour, trading volume shrank back to the freezing point.
Here's how the trading volume curve for today's whole day is plotted:
- 10:00-15:00: -97.5% (6 hours of ice)
- 16:00: -89.2% (brief warm-up, making people think it "has arrived")
- 17:00: -96.3% (Afterglow ends)
A person says "no" six times, says "okay" the seventh, and then says "no" again the eighth—that's the current market.
### Live Position Trading
Two long orders are still being held:
- **$PUMP** (Entered on 7/27 19:02, 2x 30% position, cost 0.002135): Held position ~23h, still hovering near breakeven
- **$AEON** (Entered on 7/28 09:02, 3x half position, cost 0.09212, current price ~0.1837): Floating profit close to +99%, but for a stock like AEON—if it rises quickly but moves slowly, the price is being cut in half
AEON holders now face a classic dilemma: TP is almost at 0.101332, but it's still rising. This isn't timing; it's luck playing a psychological game against you.
### My Position
I'm not bearish on BTC. $63,000 holded, OI didn't collapse, rates are neutral—this is not a panic selling structure.
But I absolutely dislike this "fake volume recovery" signal. What's even more painful than constantly shrinking is giving you hope to drain it again. At 16:00, that round of data made me think buying was returning, but now that I think about it, maybe that 8% of poor weekend liquidity was at play.
This was my true feeling on the afternoon of July 28: ** volume gave me a carrot, and then I ate it back. AEON doubled, but no one could catch it. BTC didn't crash, but no one dared to copy it. **
Hopefully the 18:00 data will look better—but I've already been fooled once today.
#BTC #AEON
---
*The above does not constitute investment advice. My advice for AEON tickets is: just take a look. *A review of the retracements of Bitcoin $BTC in past bear markets
- 2014 Cycle: High $1240, maximum drawdown -82.9%
- 2018 cycle: High $19,000, low $3,200, drawdown -83.2%
- 2022 Cycle: High $69,000, Low $15,500, Retracement -77.7%
It is clear that the maximum drawdown in each bear market is gradually narrowing, and Bitcoin, as a major asset class, has seen increased liquidity and institutional holdings, offsetting some of the downward momentum.
This round of 2026 cycle simulation
This round's high is $126,000. If historical retracements repeat their pattern:
- A retracement of 72%~77%, corresponding to the bottom range of $28,000–$35,000
- The time window, following the historical bull and bear cycles, is highly likely to fall in the fourth quarter of 2026
Core variables and points of divergence
1. Institutional funds have changed the volatility structure
Continued net inflows from ETFs and long-term accumulation by institutions like MicroStrategy have made the pace of this round of decline smoother, avoiding the early one-sided crashes. However, the process of chip turnover and retail panic clearing will still be completed.
2. Disturbances in the macro environment
The Federal Reserve's interest rate policy, U.S. stock market liquidity, and global risk asset sentiment directly affect the timing of the bottom and the final price. The traditional rhythm of the four-year halving cycle is being partially corrected by the macro financial environment.
3. On-chain data corroboration
Currently, whale addresses are accumulating shares against the trend, and the proportion of long-term holdings continues to rise, indicating that large funds have started to position themselves at the current price level. Even if there is still room to decline, the downside slope and room will be weaker than in previous bear markets.
Overall, historical drawdown magnitude is an important reference, but the current institutional market structure means the bottom range will not fully follow past proportions. 28,000–35,000 is the extreme bottom under a pessimistic scenario, with more institutions indicating a benchmark bottom in the $40,000–$46,000 range.HBM supply/demand is flashing 3 signals. AI compute might be the biggest beta trade from 2024-2026.
1. Training → Inference shift. Training growth is slowing. Inference demand is exploding. That’s the pivot.
2. HBM revenue +60% YoY. This is the cleanest proxy for AI compute. Micron GM at 35% confirms the cycle has flipped from losses to profit.
But don’t YOLO. Discipline > predictions. Scale in tranches.
How to track it:
- Is HBM capacity actually shipping?
- Are margins sustainable?
- Is client capex rotating from training to inference?
Strong demand ≠ automatic FCF for every supplier.
My 3-layer check:
1. Order backlog + utilization
2. Pricing, yields, and capex alignment
3. Cross-check with peers, equipment makers, and cloud buyers
If price runs but fundamentals lag, treat it as a trade, not an investment.
Risks: AI narratives price the future early. Supply ramps or delayed spend = violent swings. Not financial advice.
Execution: Wait for 2 quarters of confirmed earnings before adding size. Use limits. Don’t let hype override valuation or exit rules.
#DailyOrbit #FOMCRateWatch
#CXMTDebutShockwave The complete lifecycle of a Meme coin consists of six stages
1️⃣ Market cap of $10,000–$100,000: Startup warm-up period
When the project first launches, the community is very small, with almost no KOL promotion, and most Doudou will be wiped out at this stage; Once a traffic influencer starts spreading the word, it lays the foundation for rapid takeoff.
2️⃣ Market value between $100,000 and $3 million: Potential exploration period
Some small and medium-sized KOLs and crypto media have started reposting, and the community is taking shape. This range can easily produce dozens of times the golden dog, but the probability of falling into traps is also very high, with opportunities and risks highly intertwined.
3️⃣ Market cap of 3 million to 20 million USD: Period of rapid expansion
The project has successfully gone viral and become a hot topic within the circle, with substantial early profit-making accumulation, making it a typical main battleground for retail investors. At this point, cashing in and recovering the principal is the optimal choice.
4️⃣ Market cap of 20 million to 200 million USD: Heat harvesting period
The project has successfully entered the popular sector, gradually launching on leading centralized exchanges. When the positive momentum arrives, early holders are likely to take advantage of the exchange positive momentum to sell in bulk.
5️⃣ Market cap between 200 million and 2 billion USD: The dream-making period for all
The project became the focus of the entire internet, with retail investors benchmarking it against legendary stocks like Dogecoin. A large number of newcomers outside the industry followed the trend, pushing the bubble to the extreme, and downside risks have accumulated to the peak.
6️⃣ Market cap above $2 billion: Epic targets
Only leading meme coins like $DOGE, $PEPE, and $SHIB can reach this scale; without new narrative support, they will consolidate sideways for a long time, with only a very few able to drive the sector's rally.The patience of ETH holders has itself become a destabilizing factor in market structure, but price action has yet to confirm a reversal.
If ETH breaks below the current support range with increased volume rather than rebounding, what is the most likely variable to fail?
The original post reflects ETH holder sentiment: prolonged sideways, multiple false breakouts, and price performance lagging behind BTC. But the market does not reward mere sentiment; it only rewards structural pricing misalignments.
Factually: The ETH/BTC exchange rate is at multi-year lows, funding rates are near zero or slightly negative most of the time, and the basis is narrow. This means the derivatives market is not pricing ETH at any premium or panic over declines.
Structural change: ETH's dilemma lies in the triple squeeze of low holding costs (leverage not removed), concentrated sentiment (highly bullish among holders), and catalyst vacuum (slowing ETF inflows and falling PoS staking yields). Under this structure, the market needs deeper cleansing to reestablish spreads that attract new capital.
Transmission logic: If BTC remains high under halving expectations, ETH's low levels actually become relative value lows, provided funds must flow from BTC's profit-making to ETH. Currently, this transmission has not occurred because BTC spot ETF inflows have not significantly translated into ETH purchasing power. Altcoin trends depend more on whether ETH can stabilize first.
Bullish path: If ETH surges above $3200 and the funding rate turns positive, it forms the starting point of leveraged squeeze and may trigger short covering and buying rally entries. The condition is that BTC stabilizes simultaneously and the ETH/BTC exchange rate no longer hits new lows.
Bearish risk: If ETH falls below $2,900 and the basis continues to compress, it indicates the market accepts ETH as a weak asset, and funds will further shift toward relatively strong assets like BTC and Solana. The condition is tightening macro liquidity or negative regulatory policies regarding ETH staking and ETFs.
Conclusion: ETH needs a sharp drop on high volume to clear cheap long positions from holders, before rebuilding the pricing base for real demand.
The risk is that current sentiment is already very fragile, and any lower-than-expected rebound will accelerate sell-offs.
$ETH $BTCAs GPU suppliers begin providing credit support for customers' leases, construction debt, and chip procurement, the quality of AI demand starts to enter NVIDIA's balance sheet, as of July 28, 2026. $NVDA The "up to $100 billion, phased investment as compute power deployment" plan proposed by NVIDIA and $OPENAI in 2025 has not been further advanced as originally planned. In OpenAI's financing arrangement announced in February this year, Nvidia's actual investment was $30 billion; In March, Jensen Huang also stated that the original maximum $100 billion plan was unlikely to continue. Therefore, this article is based on the already confirmed $30 billion equity investment and no longer regards $100 billion as an existing commitment. A more significant change comes from another unconfirmed transaction. According to The Wall Street Journal, Nvidia is discussing about $250 billion in financing guarantees for a data center project in southern Ohio involving OpenAI. The project is being developed by SB Energy, a subsidiary of SoftBank, with a planned capacity of 10 gigawatts and a total cost possibly exceeding $500 billion. The report also states that NVIDIA is also discussing financing for GPU purchases worth up to approximately $350 billion. Reuters was unable to independently verify the above arrangements, and Nvidia, OpenAI, and relevant government departments did not respond formally at the time. These two figures cannot be directly added together to mean "Nvidia has already taken on $600 billion in debt." Someone asked, why did BTC just drop? Meanwhile, US stocks remained calm, with oil and gold unchanged.
Today, quite a few crypto enthusiasts who bought both BTC and SK Hynix cross-positions have been forced to liquidate their positions. If there are malicious market makers, this round might once again target fellow crypto enthusiasts.
Hyperliquid Shanghai Lishi inserted the needle at $920, who knows how many people would be liquidated. When I placed an order, I had to log into my wallet and missed it in a minute. Those who placed orders early immediately saw a 25% rebound.
After all, they didn't short ADRs on the US market, nor did they wait for the Korean market to open. Instead, they sold BTC first, then SK Hynix, and then closed the list. #韩股重挫8%, Changxin topped the A-share $ETH $BTC on its first day Just saw many people saying "Changxin's IPO is just another chip company IPO in China," but I think this understanding is too shallow.
Have you ever wondered why Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, the three giants, have tacitly controlled prices for thirty years?
What they fear most is not technological catch-up, but someone not playing by the old rule of "cutting production to maintain prices." In the past, whenever the industry declined, if any one of the three said "we are cutting production," the stock price would stabilize because no one would seize the opportunity to grab market share. But Changxin is different— the Hefei government wants market share, not profit margin. It won’t cooperate with your production cuts; it will continue to expand when you are shrinking.
What does this mean?
- Next time the DRAM cycle declines, Samsung says cut production, Changxin says I will keep building factories. Prices will fall deeper, and the cycle will be prolonged.
- The "cycle discourse power" once monopolized by the three giants now has cracks. This is not a simple IPO, but a rewriting of industry rules.
Another overlooked variable is on the demand side. AI servers have absorbed the best production lines of Samsung and SK Hynix to make HBM, squeezing standard DRAM capacity. Changxin just fits into this gap— it doesn’t compete for HBM but takes the standard product market where you can’t allocate capacity. This is not a frontal attack but a stealth move when you are too busy to notice.
This is good for downstream phone and server manufacturers; having one more supplier increases bargaining power. Samsung can no longer just raise prices at will.
But it’s not good for your Samsung and SK Hynix stocks. Long-term gross margins will be diluted. Previously, three companies split the pie; now four share it, and the fourth doesn’t care about short-term profits.
My judgment: The essence of Changxin’s IPO is not that Chinese chips have won, but that in the most concentrated oligopoly of storage, someone is playing by a new script for the first time. The market has not fully priced in this "rule break."
⚠️ The above is purely personal market observation and sharing, not investment advice. DYOR.
$SMSN $HIMX $MU $CXMT"Market's a Puzzle: Missing Pieces $SOL's beta casino continues to draw in unwary gamblers. Yet, beneath the surface, $SOL's price action is eerily similar to $TRX's 2018 performance – a sharp drop, followed by a meager rally. $ZAMA's 10.60% surge yesterday paints a different picture, though. This sudden increase suggests a well-timed whale pump, as on-chain data shows no significant influx of new capital. Meanwhile, the likes of $ENA, $SUI, and $PENGU have been left in the dust, bleeding value To give the conclusion: after STORJ was simultaneously issued on Korean trading platforms, it fell while doubling within minutes. This is not an ordinary long-short split, but rather a suspension of deposits, cutting the same asset into different liquidity islands. Bithumb's high price is not a global consensus on bullish sentiment; rather, it is a warning sign of price failure to be detected. Starting from 17:00 Beijing time on July 28, Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone each listed STORJ as a trading warning asset and suspended deposits within less than a minute. Upbit's official announcement gave the official reason: after a comprehensive assessment of major disclosures, business authenticity, sustainability, and actual progress, multiple deficiencies were identified that may harm users. The public quote interface then displays a warning status. A warning does not mean the store has been taken down; The announcement only suspended deposits and did not announce the suspension of spot trading or withdrawals. As of 17:01, the STORJ in the Upbit Korean won market was down about 10.9% from the previous day's close, ranking third among the decliners at the time. The most unusual moment happened at 17:00. Upbit's Korean won session dropped from around 79.4 to 78.0, closing at 78.4, down about 1.6% from 16:49; At the same time, Bithumb surged from 79.45 to a high of 183, closing at 171, up about 115% in a single minute. As of 17:01 precisely, Bithumb's price difference with Upbit is about 118%. The announcement coincided with the effective recharge suspension, and the two banks showed completely opposite directions and a huge price gap1. Overall judgment: The market has shifted from a recovery in risk appetite the previous day to a consolidation at a low level after a decline on high volume. Public data shows that in the past 24 hours, BTC fell about 2.55%, ETH dropped about 3.80%, and SOL dropped about 3.64%; AKE is still up about 12.98%, but its intraday fluctuation range is 0.0038575—0.0054059, showing a clear disconnect from the three mainstream products. Market overview shows the total market capitalization of about $2.17 trillion, down 2.56% from the previous cycle; Turnover was approximately 67.3 billion USD, up 30.1%; The Fear and Greed Index dropped to 34. Prices falling, volume expanding, and sentiment weakening—this is not an ordinary low-volume pullback, but a simultaneous contraction in risk appetite and leverage reallocation. BTC quickly dropped from 65,689.60 to 63,021, then rebounded to its highest point near 63,642. Within 15 minutes, it has entered a narrow consolidation range between 63,360 and 63,640, but the 1-hour and 4-hour levels still hold lower highs, with the daily moving average falling below 65,050, 64,820, 64,636, and 64,020. 63021 temporarily forms a support, but this does not mean the downward structure has ended. ETH was the best-quality trend among the four products the previous day, but this time it fell from 1977.58 to 1865—a drop larger than BTC and slightly higher than SOL. The previous relative strength has ended, and funds have not continued to flow steadily from BTC to ETH. Currently, ETH is only between 1865 and 1888$XNVDA US MEMORY STOCKS ARE CRASHING
$1 Trillion has been wiped out from US stocks in the last 3 hours, and 50% of that came from just 6 memory stocks.
US memory stocks are crashing on news that China has begun producing its own DUV chipmaking machines.
Investors worry China can now build more chip factories on its own, adding supply and pushing memory chip prices down, exactly the prices that have been driving these stocks higher all year.
- Nvidia: -4.37%, $300B wiped out
- SK Hynix: -9.48%, $95B wiped out
- Micron: -4.69%, $82B wiped out
- SanDisk: -10.42%, $26B wiped out
- Western Digital: -5.93%, $21B wiped out
- Seagate: -5.59%, $17B wiped out
In total, $541 billion has been wiped out from just these 6 memory stocks. $XNVDA Storage cycle has bottomed out? Will the mass production of domestic DUV lithography machines scare off US stocks?
On July 27, two signals in opposite directions appeared in the semiconductor sector: Samsung and SK Hynix announced an unprecedented joint capacity expansion plan:
Together, the two companies invested about 1,350 trillion Korean won (about 870 billion USD) to build storage, packaging, and logic chip capacity over the next decade. Among them, the completion date for SK Hynix's fourth factory at the Yongren campus was significantly advanced, from the original planned 2045 to 2033; The construction schedule for Samsung's P5 and P6 factories was also more than six months ahead of schedule.
For the market, this was originally a structurally positive signal—as long as AI capital spending continues, memory chip manufacturers' pricing power and profit visibility will be relatively clear.
What really hurt market sentiment was an exclusive report from The Information:
A consortium of Shanghai-based enterprises with state-owned backing has begun mass production of domestically produced immersion DUV lithography machines, with deliveries to SMIC, Hua Hong Semiconductor, and Changxin Memory. About 5 units are planned for delivery this year and about 20 units in 2027.
After the news broke, ASML's stock price plunged more than 8% intraday, while U.S. semiconductor equipment stocks such as Applied Materials, Lam Research, and Kelai were simultaneously sold off, wiping out billions of dollars in market value within minutes.
What has ever made the market nervous has never been these 5 or 20 machines themselves—the real signal is that lithography, recognized as the most difficult technical bottleneck, has been torn open.
The AI hardware industry chain is undergoing a period of differentiated pricing: memory chips benefit from structural shortages, and valuation logic remains positive; Semiconductor equipment manufacturers need to begin digesting the previously underestimated long-term tail risk of "China's independent substitution";
Meanwhile, the debt leverage of AI core computing power companies like Nvidia and Oracle is also being re-examined by the credit marketWhat the new Ondo network means for $ONDO
Ondo is replacing Ondo chain with a new execution network and will not run the two in parallel. Execution moves off the settlement layer, a decentralized network of testers determines what the secure enclaves are allowed to run, and asset transfer sits on Ethereum for now. Governance is unchanged today, but the token gets used very differently once that workload splits.刷持仓数据，又看到一组很耐人寻味的账户。 很多人第一眼只会看见$BTC 空单浮盈6855USDT，可我盯着的根本不是这点盈利数字。 拆开两张单子看逻辑，就看大佬真实想法。 一张20倍全仓$BTC 空单，另一张15倍全仓$HYPE 多单。 保证金比率两者完全一致，都是6.85%，明显是一套成套搭配出来的仓位，并不是随手瞎开的两笔单子。 表面看，他在做对冲博弈：看空大盘比特币，同时看多赛道龙头$HYPE。 赌的是$BTC震荡或者小幅下行，但$HYPE能够走出独立行情，跑赢大盘。 先看$BTC空单，开仓63516，当前小幅浮盈，强平价拉到75041。 行情只要没有出现极端暴涨，这张空单还有不小缓冲空间。 再看$HYPE多单，才是这组仓位的重头戏。账面浮亏已经来到‑97407USDT，收益率接近‑98%。 15倍杠杆摆在眼前，但强平价压得非常低。依靠全仓交叉保证金，硬生生扛住了巨大回撤，还没有被直接拍爆。 第一眼看上去杠杆很高，可细看强平价就明白，他提前给账户留足安全垫，硬扛住这一轮$HYPE下跌。 当然这套组合，同样要付出实打实代价。 一边做空$BTC持续缴纳资金费率，一边长期扛住$HYPESanDisk crashed! $SNDK plunged 10.79% on July 24, and today, July 27, it once dropped more than 14% intraday. In just two trading days, more than one-fifth of its market value evaporated. The intraday low dropped to $1,226.9, more than a quarter of the July 23 high of $1,696.37. What exactly happened to SanDisk, widely regarded as the "number one beneficiary of AI storage"? 1. Two consecutive days of "relay plunge" Let's look at this data first. July 23: SanDisk closed at $1610.33, and even surged to a stage high of 1696.37 during the session. Everything seemed normal. July 24: Plunged 10.79%, closed at 1436.56, trading volume expanded to 14.08 million shares, and main funds saw a net outflow of $141 million that day. July 27: Even worse. It closed at 1272.47, down 11.42%, with main funds flowing out another 226 million. The intraday low fell to 1226.9, with the decline continuing to widen. Over three trading days, from a high of 1696 to a low of 1226, a retracement of 27.7%. This is not an adjustment, it's an avalanche. II. Three Negative Bombs Triggered Simultaneously 1. First Bomb: Analysts Lower Target Price, Morgan Stanley Directly Declares 'The Turning Point Has Arrived' Investment Bank Susquehanna slashed SanDisk's target price from $3,250 to $3,050, citing discrepancies in revenue and profit forecasts in the company's financial model, and the storage needs for AI inference simply don't existThe intraday plunge in US chip stocks is not just an ordinary correction, but the market is beginning to price AI chip demand for sustainability again.
On the actual side, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell about 4% intraday, core chip stocks like Nvidia and Micron dropped significantly, and European stocks like ASML, BE Semiconductor, and Infineon also weakened in tandem, with the market experiencing a global sell-off.
This is not a single company's negative factor, but a collective correction across the global AI chip industry chain.
More noteworthy is that the decline occurred amid continued AI positive news releases.
The logic of the past market was simple:
As demand for AI computing power continues to grow and cloud providers keep expanding their data centers, chip companies should keep benefiting.
But now, the market is asking another question:
Are these needs genuine, or are they built together by capital expenditure and financing?
----------------------------------------------------------
The most typical example is the NVIDIA $NVDA.
Public information shows that NVIDIA and OpenAI are discussing an AI data center project with a total investment of about $500 billion, with a forward power supply capacity of up to 10GW in Ohio, USA. Among these, AI chip procurement alone could reach $350 billion.
At the same time, there are reports that Nvidia may provide OpenAI with about $250 billion in financing or guarantees to lease related data center resources.
On the surface, this is obviously a huge positive sign.
More data centers, more GPUs, more customer binding.
But what the market really worries about is:
If suppliers start financing customers and then customers purchase chips, will the quality of revenue growth decline?
Orders still exist, but credit risk, funding costs, and future returns will remain more on chip companies' balance sheets.
That's also why on the same day, Nvidia's five-year CDS rose significantly.
This does not mean Nvidia has credit issues, but rather that the bond market has begun to reassess its potential risks.
----------------------------------------------------------
AMD $AMD is in a similar situation.
Recently, AMD launched the Helios AI infrastructure, next-generation EPYC CPUs, and Instinct MI400 GPUs, continuously improving its full-stack AI layout.
The news hasn't gotten worse.
However, the stock price still fell more than 8%.
It is clear that what the market is truly concerned about right now is:
Can AMD secure sufficiently large AI orders? If capital expenditures start to cool, will opportunities for a second supplier be delayed?
The Intel $INTC is no exception.
Even after previously reporting solid quarterly results and advancing advanced processes like 14A and 18A-P, the stock price still declined.
This indicates that when risk appetite in the sector declines, performance improvements are no longer sufficient to support valuations.
----------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, the bears have also started to increase their holdings.
"Big short" Michael Burry has once again expanded his short positions in major chip stocks.
This does not prove that AI is over, nor does it mean chip demand will plummet sharply.
It further illustrates:
Some within the market have already begun to bet—AI chip valuations are now outpacing the speed at which demand is being delivered.
----------------------------------------------------------
So, what truly changed this round of plunge isn't the industry fundamentals, but the market's main focus.
In the past, the market looked at:
Is the growth fast enough?
Now the market is starting to see:
Is the growth healthy enough?
The larger the project, the more the market tends to ask:
*Who pays?
*Who bears the risk?
*Are orders supported by financing?
*Can AI investment truly generate cash flow in the future?
These questions still lack clear answers.
----------------------------------------------------------
My judgment is:
This is more like a stress test of AI valuation and narrative than a fundamental reversal.
If large cloud providers continue to expand capital expenditures and maintain healthy order quality in the future, this round of decline is more likely to be a sharp drawdown in a high-valuation industry.
But if more and more AI projects must rely on financing, guarantees, and other complex capital arrangements to advance, the market will continue to lower the valuation of chip stocks.
Because what the market truly doubts is no longer demand, but the quality of demand.
----------------------------------------------------------
Next, I will focus on three key indicators:
(1) Whether cloud providers' capital expenditures continue to be revised upward;
(2) Whether chip orders are increasingly dependent on financing or guarantees;
(3) Whether the gross margins, cash flow, and accounts receivable of NVIDIA and AMD can still support the current high growth.
The story of AI chips is far from over.
But the market is no longer satisfied with just saying, "AI needs more chips."
What it really wants to know is:
Who bought these chips? Where does the money come from? And how much return can it ultimately create?
This is the key to determining whether the next AI market can continue to expand.1. Ice and Fire Twins: Two Capital Scenes on the Same Day From July 27 to 28, 2026, in just 48 hours, the East Asian capital market staged a jaw-dropping "Ice and Fire Symphony." On one hand, the A-share market is boiling. Changxin Technology (688825), a leading domestic DRAM manufacturer, listed on the STAR Market, opening at an issue price of 8.66 yuan per share, soaring 471.59%, reaching an intraday high of 55.03 yuan, and closing at 49 yuan per share, with total market value climbing to about 3.28 trillion yuan. This figure not only unsurprisingly tops the A-share market capitalization list, but also surpasses the market value of US tech giant Intel, which is about 3.15 trillion RMB. The total turnover for the day was 141.187 billion yuan, setting a new single-day trading record for individual A-shares. On the other hand, the Korean stock market has also collapsed. On July 28, South Korea's KOSPI closed down 10.84%, marking its largest single-day drop since March 4 at 6,023.66 points, with a cumulative drop approaching 30% this month. Storage giants SK Hynix fell more than 14% that day, while Samsung Electronics fell over 13%. The Nikkei 225 Index was also not spared, closing down 3.95%, with Kioxia down over 18% and Tokyo Electron down nearly 11%. Under the same sky, one market raises a glass to the rise of domestic chips, while the other market panics due to the avalanche of storage giants' stock prices. Behind this cross-border capital upheaval lies the quiet reshaping of the global storage industry landscape. 2. Changxin Reaches the Top: Triple Drivers of Performance, Status, and Chips As a fundraising fundraiser since the STAR Market's launchThe previous statement was too brief and was criticized for implying that the price would rise no matter what. After some thought, it indeed lacked rigor.
Let me break down the logic chain again:
1. This downturn clearly started internally; basically, the buying momentum was exhausted after too much of a rise. To give a recent example, Meta announced selling computing power and then dropped, followed by a drop after Apple's price increase. It's obvious that the US tech giants are starting to diverge internally.
2. Hynix's US-listed ADR was drained again. Although the ADR's high premium seemed to spark a small boom, this was based on low conversion and limited circulation.
3. This week's downturn is partly due to major negative factors that fundamentally undermine the previous scarcity, such as the expansion of the three seas' production capacity, Changxin's listing, and breakthroughs in DUV lithography machines.
4. Most importantly, after Waller took office, the Federal Reserve withdrew forward guidance on information disclosure. The market is still adapting and adjusting, making it inherently fragile. For institutional large funds, it is necessary to hedge ahead of this week's FOMC meeting. Regardless of whether there is a rate hike, they need to deleverage in advance. After all, large funds' withdrawal is not as simple as retail investors clicking a one-click sell; it requires a longer preparation window.
5. Therefore, it is very normal risk control behavior for funds to reduce risk exposure and deleverage before an unpredictable announcement.
6. Recently, the stock prices of companies with excessive AI capital expenditures, which Waller is concerned about, have already effectively undergone a rate hike through a sharp drop, but this cost was borne by shareholders. Thus, the Federal Reserve actually has no need to hike again. If it does not hike, positions reduced prematurely under Fed pressure might be added back after the announcement, which explains the earlier logic that a rebound could occur regardless of whether the Fed hikes or not. But if it really hikes, the market might panic again, though the extent may be limited since this has already been priced in.
7. Although the probability of a July rate hike is indeed increasing, according to Waller's own stance, a hike in July is not appropriate. The so-called hike to restore the Fed's authority is too trivial. With CPI still trending down, a forced hike without convincing data would only weaken the already questioned Fed credibility, let alone restore it.
8. The market has recently stopped mentioning Trump's original intention in nominating Waller. This might be a sign of Waller's successful tactics, but this political deal does exist; we just don't know when or how it will be activated. However, we know the Federal Reserve, Treasury, Waller, and Brainard have close ties and are intentionally coordinating efforts toward a soft landing. #美联储周四凌晨公布利率决议 $MU $SKHYNIX $SKHY 🔷️ $Ethereum has completed the first phase of its recovery. Now the real test has arrived.
📈 In our previous analysis, the focus was on whether $ETH can reclaim it after losing the long-term uptrend line. This recovery is now happening just as expected. Buyers defended the long-term demand zone, reclaimed the breached trendline, and shifted the market structure from capitulation to recovery.
⚖️ The next challenge is far more important than before. The price has now reached the first major weekly supply zone, where buying momentum is beginning to face resistance. This is not a bearish signal in itself, but rather the first meaningful test facing the new structure. If buyers absorb this supply while maintaining the trendline above the reclaimed trendline, the recovery narrative will become significantly stronger.
⚠️ Not financial advice.
#ETH #Ethereum #Crypto #Altcoins#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到
Practical Thoughts on the Linkage Between US Stocks and BTC
After carefully reading Trader Assassin's sharing, the three-layer logical framework is very clear. I would like to add a few points based on some observations from my own trading experience.
1. About the "Time Dislocation" Trading Window — Adding a Detail
Assassin mentioned that when the Nasdaq drops more than 1%, BTC is very likely to open lower during the Asian session. I have repeatedly verified this observation in practice. There is a detail that is easy to overlook: the movement in the last hour before the US stock market closes is more valuable as a reference than the full-day price change.
If the three major US indices close down for the day, but the last 30 minutes show a clear rebound (for example, narrowing from -1.5% to -0.8%), then BTC often does not open directly lower in the Asian session but first makes a false breakdown before quickly recovering. Conversely, if there is an accelerated plunge before the close, BTC’s low open the next day usually exceeds the Nasdaq’s drop.
In practice, I look specifically at the candlestick of the last hour before the US market close, which is more indicative than the full-day price change. Assassin’s point about "waiting for a low open and stabilization after the Nasdaq drops more than 1% before taking action" has a higher success rate when confirming the late-session rebound signal.
2. About the Observation of "Crypto Independent Pricing" — Data Supports This Judgment
Assassin mentioned that on July 17, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell 4.3% in one day, but BTC did not follow down much, and this phenomenon is not an isolated case.
According to data from crypto market analysis firms, the 30-day correlation coefficient between BTC and Nasdaq has dropped from the recent high of 0.78 to 0.51, indicating a gradual decoupling. The crypto market is evolving from being a "shadow" of tech stocks into an independent pricing entity. This decoupling could mean one of two things — either crypto’s internal deleveraging is nearing completion, or it is an early signal of divergence in macro risk appetite. I lean toward the former because on-chain data shows that the ratio of BTC contract open interest to market cap has fallen to the 15th percentile of the past six months, meaning deleveraging is indeed progressing.
Assassin’s statement that "divergence is often a short-term bottom signal" is a valid observation in practice. However, note that a single divergence is insufficient to confirm a trend reversal; 2-3 consecutive divergence signals need to accumulate to form a reliable basis for a counter-trend trade.
3. About the "Sentiment Transmission" False Breakout Trap — Using Data to Filter Noise
Assassin pointed out that sentiment transmission often produces false breakouts, which I strongly agree with. My approach is to verify with volume.
When Nasdaq futures rise due to CPI or other data and BTC rises simultaneously, if the 15-minute candlestick volume does not significantly increase (below the average volume of the past 20 candles), this rally is likely a sentiment pulse and will retrace gains later. Only a volume breakout is worth following.
Assassin finally mentioned holding a 100x short position on BTCUSDT. With such high leverage, the damage from false breakouts is magnified. At this level, I suggest focusing on the resistance zone between 65,000 and 65,500. If BTC rebounds with low volume into this area, the risk-reward ratio for shorting may be relatively limited.
In conclusion:
The three-layer framework shared by Assassin — time dislocation, capital transmission, and sentiment transmission — thoroughly explains the core logic of the linkage between US stocks and BTC. A personal addition: the effectiveness of this framework varies in bull and bear markets. In bear markets, capital transmission (channel two) carries more weight, as forced liquidations by institutions amplify declines; in bull markets, sentiment transmission (channel three) is more influential, with negative news often quickly absorbed. The current market is in a transition from bear to bull, with the weights of these two channels rebalancing — this is the deeper reason Assassin observed the "loosening linkage."
Thanks to Assassin for the sharing; this framework is worth repeated study.#停火预期兑现, WTI crude oil futures fell 8.68% in a single day
Today, WTI crude oil futures fell by 8.68% in a single day.
This is not just a data shock, but also a rare and dramatic market reaction since COVID-19.
If you only see "market volatility," you may be missing the core logic. This is essentially a "structural pricing reset."
Looking back over the past three months, from the lockdown order to the implementation of the ceasefire, the macro-level suppression has finally completed its course. Today marks the biggest positive macro turning point in this round of tracking.
The macro reasoning behind this is clearly visible:
Geo-easing: The ceasefire agreement was fulfilled, and the geopolitical premium faded.
Cost improvement: The sharp drop in oil prices directly led to improved inflation expectations.
Policy shift: As inflation cools, the probability of Fed rate cuts rises accordingly.
Liquidity Release: Rate cuts signal a return of liquidity easing expectations.
Ultimately, when the liquidity floodgates reopen, risk assets will welcome a new inflow.
This is undoubtedly a clear long-term positive for $BTC and the entire risk asset market.
The bigger the waves, the more expensive the fish. See the structure clearly, embrace the trend! #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard Analysis of the best investment timing and buying points for Core public chain tokens right now
Current benchmark (July 28, 2026): CORE current price $0.01755, circulating market cap about $23.5 million, highly pegged to Bitcoin trends (correlation 0.88), with circulating tokens continuously unlocking to suppress the market, classified as a highly volatile small-cap cryptocurrency.
1. The Underlying Logic of Core Investment Opportunities (Only Objectively Sorting the Narrative)
1. Structural tightening on the supply and demand sides (medium- to long-term core fundamentals)
1. Mining Reduction Output: In 2026, CORE block mining output will be reduced by a fixed 17%, shrinking the supply of native new tokens to reduce inflationary selling pressure at the source;
2. Revenue buyback and burn mechanism: On-chain BTC staking, lending, and SatPay payments generate protocol profits. Regular secondary market buybacks and burns CORE. The higher the ecosystem activity, the stronger the buyback purchasing power, forming a closed loop of "ecosystem revenue →buyback and burn→deflation and appreciation."
3. Essential demand in the BTCFi sector: The exclusive Satoshi Plus hybrid consensus enables BTC non-custodial staking (users do not transfer private keys), precisely addressing the pain point of Bitcoin asset idle yield, with long-term growth potential in the sector.
2. Key Event Catalysts (Core Price Pulse Triggers)
Core events, expected implementation time, market catalyst strength
Node decentralized scaling and permissionless validation nodes will be significantly enhanced by 2027, which will boost valuations
SatPay offline payment scale-scale commercial implementation from end of 2026 to 2027 Validating the business model and generating real revenue and incremental buybacks
Inclusion of multi-currency US crypto portfolio ETF holdings in US stocks: As early as 2027, incremental funds from traditional institutions will enter the market
2. Precise Periodic Entry Point Division (Support/Resistance Price + Entry Conditions)
(1) Left-side staggered buying points (long-term positioning, suitable for holding for 1-3 years, divided into three positions)
Tier 1: Ultimate Security Heavy Position Buy Point (Strong Support, Best Value for Money)
Price range: $0.016~0.017
Technical logic: The daily chart has been fluctuating at the lower boundary for a long time, and the chip support level that has stabilized multiple times in history means a break below this level means liquidity collapses in the market.
Entry Requirements:
1. Bitcoin has not experienced a deep crash (BTC price has held above $65,000);
2. No large-scale team/private token centralized unlock announcements;
Position planning: 40% of total funds in positions, stop-loss set at $0.014 (permanent exit if it falls below the threshold).
Tier 2: Steady Phased Buying Points (Neutral Margin of Safety)
Price range: $0.0175~$0.0185 (near current price)
Technical logic: Short-term first support range, current market volatility center;
Prerequisites for entry: daily chart stabilization, shrinking trading volume, selling pressure gradually released;
Position planning: 30% of total funds in position, stop-loss of $0.016.
Tier 3: Right-side confirmation trend buy point (lower risk, slightly higher cost)
Price breakout confirmation level: Holds above $0.025 and closes unbroken for three consecutive days
Logic: Breaking through short-term and long-term moving average resistance reverses bearish trend, and funds begin to actively enter the market;
Position planning: Follow up on the remaining 30% position, stop loss at $0.021.
(2) Short-term Swing Buy Points (1-3 month event games, high volatility, high risk)
1. Buying Points Before Hard Fork Upgrade: Before each major mainnet upgrade (Hermes, Theseus-type hard forks), 2~3 weeks before the listing, the price pulls back below 0.018, triggering a light position upgrade and taking profits in batches;
2. Buyback and Burn Public Announcement Implementation Buying Points: Official disclosure of large-scale buyback and destruction execution announcements, short-term speculative sentiment after pullbacks boosted;
3. After Bitcoin's temporary correction stabilizes: After the BTC correction ends and a rebound begins, CORE's small-cap elasticity will far exceed that of mainstream coins, making it suitable for short-term gaming.
(3) Core Buying Points for the Next Bitcoin Bull Market (2028-2029 Major Market Trends)
1. Early Bull Market Buying Points (3-6 months before the 2028 Bitcoin halving)
Price range: $0.02~$0.03, broad market liquidity is loose, overall sentiment in the crypto market is warming, and positioning is at a premium in the sector;
2. Main points for adding positions during bull market rallies
After the BTC halving was implemented, the scale of BTC locked on CORE chain increased simultaneously, and buyback amounts surged. After breaking through $0.3, a trend increase was confirmed, betting on a neutral price range of $0.3~$1.2.
3. Different buy points and supporting take-profit strategies
1. Long-term left-side position take-profit (3-year dimension)
Pessimistic scenario: $0.08~$0.25, phased liquidation and exit;
Neutral scenario: 0.3~1.2 USD, take profit and cash out most of your position in 3 installments;
Optimistic scenario: Clearing above $1.5 to avoid the risk of a crash in small-cap coins at the end of the bull market.
2. Short-term swing take-profit: Each round rebounds to the 0.024~0.025 short-term resistance level; take 70% of the position, and the remaining positions depend on the breakout status.
4. Fatal Risks to Avoid When Entering (Deciding Success or Failure of Buying Points)
1. During the token unlocking pressure window, heavy positions are strictly prohibited: teams and private funds unlock in batches each month. The unlocking month is prone to sell-offs, so avoid entering during large unlock periods;
2. Decentralization implementation falls short of expectations: If node expansion is delayed for a long time, institutional funds will not enter the market, and valuations will remain low for a long time;
3. Diverting of BTCFi Sector Competitors: Stacks and Babylon continue to compete for BTC staking funds, causing CORE revenue and buybacks to fall far short of expectations;
4. Regulatory Policy Risk: Tightening crypto regulations in Europe and the US will directly block institutional capital inflows, causing long-term price declines;
5. Liquidity risk: CORE's average daily trading volume is relatively low, and large funds entering and exiting can cause severe slippage, making it unsuitable for large-scale capital allocation.
5. Summarize objective conclusions
1. The highest long-term cost-performance buying points are concentrated in the $0.016~$0.017 range, which is a left-side safe position; The buying point on the right side of the trend reversal is holding steady at $0.025;
2. The biggest market opportunities are concentrated in the bull market cycle after the 2028 Bitcoin halving, with only event-driven small swing opportunities in the short term; Hyperliquid responds to Hynix contract insertion
Hyperliquid responded that classifying the market as a third-party deployment does not fully explain where this "needle" came from.
At 07:00 on July 28 (UTC+8), the Hyperliquid public API showed that the one-minute candlestick for the HIP-3 market xyz:SKHX opened at 1128.2, hit a low of 927.0, and closed at 954.98, down about 17.8% from the opening to the low; In that minute, about 41,000 units and 7,501 deals were transacted. Two minutes later, the price recovered to 1115.5, essentially recovering within minutes.
What can be confirmed is a severe price misalignment. What is the cause, and is it related to abnormal data or human manipulation? Currently, there are no accurate investigation conclusions.
Hyperliquid later stated that the SKHYNIX perpetual contract is deployed and operated by the Trade.xyz team, which is currently investigating and will update it once conclusions are drawn.
This time exposed some structural issues of HIP-3.
HIP-3 allows independent teams to deploy perpetual markets on Hyperliquid: order matching and settlement run on HyperCore, while listing rules, contract parameters, and oracle updates are handled by the deployer. In other words, "transactions happening in Hyperliquid" are not the same as "prices are entirely controlled by Hyperliquid."
According to the Trade.xyz document, SKHX marks the price as the median of three parts: oracle price, oracle overlay 150-second basis EMA, and the median of buy-one, sell-one, and latest transaction prices. The first two items were released by Trade.xyz's relayer.
Hyperliquid's straightforward explanation: if the on-chain component is 100 and the deployer provides 150 and 151, the final median will be 150. This mechanism explains why price input by the deployer is important, but it cannot be used to assert that this event was a oracle attack.
The impact is not limited to an ugly candlestick.
Mark prices are used for margin, forced liquidation, stop-loss triggers, and unrealized profits and losses. Even if the price recovers quickly, even briefly crossing the risk line can still change the account outcome. Currently, public information still lacks several answers: which price input deviated first, whether the relayer and external data sources are normal, how many forced liquidations or stop-losses were triggered during this period, and how affected accounts will handle it.
Trade.xyz Pricing inputs and survey logs need to be explained; Hyperliquid also cannot avoid product-level responsibility. Users accessing the HIP-3 market through the Hyperliquid ecosystem interface and HyperCore infrastructure, whether third-party deployment identifiers, oracle sources, abnormal price protection, and appeal mechanisms are clear enough must be re-examined.
HIP-3 requires deployers to stake 500,000 HYPE, and malicious or harmful operations may trigger slashing. However, forfeited assets will be destroyed and will not be automatically used to compensate users.
HIP-3 hands over the right to list tokens to the market and also removes oracle risk, so the responsibility and risk of decentralized listing also require deeper consideration.
$HYPE $BTC $OKB $SNDK $SKHYNIX 它跌得比很多同行更狠，我认为有两个原因。 一，它前期涨幅本来就大，获利盘最多，资金兑现利润时往往也是它跌得最快。 在高息环境下，一旦出现任何不及预期的宏观数据（如通胀反弹、地缘政治紧张），获利盘的避险出逃会引发自动止损盘的连锁反应，导致板块出现无基本面支撑的集体闪崩。 第二，市场现在开始讨论一个新的问题：如果未来存储供给扩张速度超过 AI 需求增长速度，高估值还能维持多久？ 最近市场对这一风险的担忧明显升温，导致闪迪、SK 海力士、美光等存储股同步走弱。 尽管AI概念火热，但2026年全球智能手机和PC的实际换机潮如果不及预期，NAND 闪存的库存压力就会反弹。你可以分析指出，市场抛售西部数据（WDC）等相关标的，是因为投资者意识到：单靠AI算力中心的需求，无法完全抵消消费电子基本面疲软带来的负面影响。 如果只是情绪杀跌，那么后面可能会迎来修复。 但如果市场开始重新给整个存储行业估值，那这轮调整可能不会一天两天就结束。 我更关心的是，下一份财报和行业需求数据能不能证明，AI 对高端存储的需求依旧足够强，而不是急着去猜今天是不是最低点。 所以，现在要不要抄底The biggest variable this week is not oil prices, but the FOMC.
At 2 a.m. Beijing time on July 30, the Federal Reserve announced its interest rate decision. This conference was called "the most unpredictable in recent years" by multiple organizations.
CME data shows a 36.3% probability of a rate hike in July. Two weeks ago, this figure was only 10%.
From 10% to 36%—thanks to oil prices.
Even more intense was September—the probability of keeping rates unchanged dropped to just 18.5%, while the probability of a rate hike had already exceeded 80%.
Oil prices have fallen, but the Federal Reserve has yet to respond.
If the FOMC's statement is hawkish—even without a rate hike, as long as the wording is strong—a stronger dollar would offset all the positive factors in falling oil prices. BTC may test its bottom again.
If the FOMC decides to be dovish—falling oil prices + weak dollar—the crypto world will experience a second wave of impulse.
Two variables, four combinations, completely different directions.#Korean stocks plunge 8%, Changxin tops A-shares on debut
The Asia-Pacific market experienced severe volatility today, with South Korea's KOSPI crashing over 8% intraday triggering a circuit breaker. Samsung and SK Hynix, two major memory giants, plunged deeply; meanwhile, Changxin Technology surged on its first day on the STAR Market, with its market value topping A-shares. This stark contrast reflects a fundamental global DRAM industry chain repricing. This tech storm will also indirectly disturb Bitcoin market sentiment. Here's a clear explanation of the logic.
1. One side celebrates, the other crashes — the core truth behind it
The global DRAM market has long been dominated by the oligopoly of Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. These giants control production capacity to influence memory prices, prioritizing high-end capacity supply for the HBM computing power track.
1. Changxin Technology’s IPO raised huge funds to continuously expand DDR5 production and develop high-end memory. Market expectations: general DRAM supply will keep increasing over the next two years, and Korean companies can no longer arbitrarily control production to raise prices. Foreign investors preemptively sold Korean memory leaders, fearing a long-term profit ceiling decline.
2. The Korean stock market structure is extremely skewed, with a very high semiconductor weighting. The memory sector’s collective sell-off directly dragged down the entire index; combined with foreign capital flight for risk aversion and forced deleveraging of margin funds, the index plunged rapidly.
3. Objective reality check: in the short term, Changxin’s capacity, high-end HBM technology, and overseas giants still have gaps. Large-scale new capacity release has a time lag and won’t immediately reverse the current HBM shortage. The impact belongs to a mid-to-long-term narrative.
2. Two main market themes: positives and risks separated
✅ Mid-to-long-term positive logic
1. Diversification of domestic computing power supply chains; the long-term expansion logic of AI computing hardware remains unchanged; high-end HBM remains in short supply, causing internal differentiation in the sector — general memory faces internal competition, high-end memory remains scarce.
2. Expectations for global tech autonomy are heating up; the capital expenditure logic of the computing power industry chain has not completely reversed.
⚠️ Current explicit risks
1. Capital is starting to trade on expectations of future capacity oversupply; global semiconductor sector valuations are under pressure. US storage and chip sectors continue to weaken, suppressing market risk appetite.
2. Asia-Pacific stock markets are panicking collectively; risk aversion is spreading, easily dragging risk assets down in tandem.
3. Key point: how this transmits to the Bitcoin market
Many think chip news is unrelated to BTC, but global capital risk appetite is interconnected.
Two scenarios clearly distinguished:
1. Pessimistic scenario (currently more probable)
Asia-Pacific stock panic spreads, US semiconductor weakens accordingly, capital reduces risk asset positions. Bitcoin is pressured, testing support at 64600; if it breaks effectively, further downside targets the 62000 range.
2. Divergent scenario
Market capital differentiates between "general memory internal competition" and "AI high-end computing power shortage," tech sector sentiment recovers, risk appetite warms, BTC maintains range-bound oscillation, testing resistance at 66800.
Key judgment: this is a mid-to-long-term industry variable that won’t directly trigger a unilateral bull or bear market but will increase market volatility. Coupled with the Fed rate decision early Thursday morning, multiple news factors resonate, sharply raising the risk of night-time flash crashes.Coinbase has obtained UK authorization to integrate equities, derivatives, and crypto assets, and is reshaping risk appetite and position propagation paths through full-category accounts. After the same account includes real stocks, tokenized stocks, and perpetual contracts, cross-border asset liquidity efficiency improves, but it also raises the difficulty of identifying underlying risks. If cross-asset trading volume continues to grow, risk appetite will accelerate the spread to derivatives instruments, thereby boosting the valuation of $COIN platforms. If product boundaries become blurred and regulatory compliance reviews escalate, the position expansion simulation brought by all category accounts will immediately fail.
#交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard #新手必看: Everything you need is here #停火预期兑现, WTI crude oil futures fell 8.68% in a single day🦈 $BABY TVL SHIFT: FROM LIQUIDITY HUNT TO STRUCTURAL ACCUMULATION 📊
In the first 30 days post mainnet, Babylon’s cap-2 absorbed 23,857 BTC ($2B) in a near-vertical TVL surge — classic early-cycle FOMO where everyone feared missing a staking slot. 📈 That event-driven explosion reflected pure institutional demand chasing limited access.
Fast forward to the latest 30-day window: TVL fluctuates between $4–5.6B, even dropping 32% when Lombard withdrew 14,929 BTC during a finality provider swap. 🔍 This isn’t retail panic — it’s internal operational adjustments. The growth now is structural, not hype-dependent. 🏦 Smart money is watching TVL stabilize as decentralized staking infrastructure matures. 💬 Are you tracking the TVL composition for signs of the next accumulation phase? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到
在我的交易决策中，我会参考，而且必须参考美股走势。
一 美股不是风向标，是情绪放大器。
这些年的交易中，我越来越确信一件事：BTC和美股从来不是简单的跟涨跟跌关系。 2017年BTC独立走牛时，美股在横盘；2020年3月黑色星期四，两者同步暴跌；2024年ETF通过后，BTC反而开始表现出美股补涨的特征。
所以我把美股当作情绪共振的检测器，而非价格预测器。具体做法是：
1 开盘前看纳指期货：若期货大幅低开，我会提前降低杠杆，但绝不盲目做空BTC——加密市场的反骨往往在美股恐慌时显现。
2 收盘后复盘联动强度：当天BTC与纳指相关系数>0.8，说明市场在宏观叙事主导下，次日延续概率高；若<0.3，说明加密市场有独立逻辑，要盯紧链上数据。
二 真正值钱的不是联动，是错位。
新手看美股是为了跟，老手看美股是为了找背离。
我最赚钱的几次交易，都来自这种错位。2022年6月美股连续暴跌，BTC跌幅却明显收窄，链上数据显示大户在65000-70000区间持续吸筹——这是典型的美股恐慌，BTC筑底背离信号，后果然迎来反弹。
2024年11月美股科技股狂欢，BTC却滞涨，随后发现是机构在获利了结转向传统市场——反向操作，减仓避险。
美股大涨但BTC涨幅明显落后，是反向操作的信号——这句话我深以为然。联动中的裂缝，往往是超额收益的来源。
三 参考美股的三个非价格维度
1 美元流动性：美债收益率、美元指数——这比纳指更能解释BTC的长期趋势。
2 风险偏好的温度计：VIX指数>25时，我会收紧止损；<15时，才敢上高杠杆追趋势。
3 政策预期窗口：美联储讲话、CPI数据发布前后，美股和BTC的波动率会同步放大，这时候等纳指期货方向确认再动手是铁律。
四 一个反直觉的真相
越是大资金，越需要参考美股；越是小资金，越应该忽略美股。
因为机构的风控模型是跨资产的。当美股触发风控线，机构会无差别抛售包括BTC在内的所有风险资产——2020年3月就是血淋淋的教训。作为散户，理解这个逻辑，才能在大资金踩踏前提前避险，或在错杀后勇敢抄底。
美股在我交易桌上的位置，是第三块屏幕——第一块是BTC的K线和链上数据，第二块是宏观新闻和情绪指标，第三块才是美股走势。
参考它，是为了在联动中找到独立；利用独立，才是币圈生存的真谛。🌙 US Stock Pre-Market｜Is AI Trading Entering a "Repricing" Phase? Tonight, the Market Focuses on Two Words: Valuation
The most important thing in pre-market today is not a single stock, but that the entire AI trading logic is being repriced. Asian chip stocks plunged sharply today, with South Korea's KOSPI falling more than 10% at one point. SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics dropped about 14% and 13% respectively. The market is concentrating pressure on two issues: "intensified competition from China" and "who will ultimately pay for AI infrastructure." The strong listing of Changxin Technology (CXMT), market concerns over China's storage capacity expansion, and the uncertainty of AI capital expenditure returns have collectively amplified this wave of sentiment shock.
From a pre-market perspective, this is not an isolated event for US semiconductor stocks. Reuters has repeatedly mentioned in recent days that market concerns about chip stocks have shifted from "whether AI demand exists" to "whether AI investment can be sustained and valuations can hold." Last week, Intel's stock fell despite decent earnings, indicating that capital is no longer unconditionally buying into the AI concept but is starting to question whether massive capital expenditures can ultimately translate into profits.
Tonight before the market opens, I am more focused on whether the chain of Micron, SanDisk, TSMC, Broadcom, and Nvidia will continue to face valuation pressure from capital. If the market continues to trade on "increased supply, intensified competition, and uncertain AI returns," storage and high-end computing stocks will be more sensitive in the short term; but if capital is willing to interpret today's decline as an emotional release rather than a fundamental turning point, tech stocks still have a chance to recover. Reuters also mentioned that behind the recent volatility in chip stocks, the core controversy has always been whether AI infrastructure investment can continue to expand.
My understanding is that this round of market activity does not mean "AI is over," but that the market is beginning to distinguish who the real beneficiaries are and who just have bigger stories. AI is still here, but capital cares more about harder variables like storage, advanced manufacturing, packaging, and capital expenditure returns. Today's pre-market sentiment is cautious, and the semiconductor sector will likely remain under pressure, but what truly determines the medium-term direction is the tech giants' earnings reports this week and their stance on AI investment.
Three key things to watch in pre-market today:
First, can chip stocks stop falling; second, will capital continue to withdraw from high-valuation AI targets; third, before tech giants' earnings reports, is the market willing to buy back semiconductors.
In a nutshell: tonight's pre-market trading is not about price moves but the market's re-evaluation of AI valuations.
Are you more worried about "cooling AI demand" or "semiconductor valuations being too high"? The Federal Reserve decision countdown begins, this week may determine the market direction for August
This week, the global financial market faces the most important macro event of July—the Federal Reserve FOMC interest rate decision, which will be announced at 2 a.m. Beijing time on Thursday. Although the market generally expects the rate to remain unchanged, what truly impacts the market is not "whether to hold steady," but Powell's statements on the future pace of rate cuts and the economic outlook.
The macro environment is rapidly changing recently. With the easing of the Middle East situation, international oil prices have noticeably fallen, easing concerns about energy-driven inflation rebounds; meanwhile, the latest U.S. initial jobless claims were lower than expected, showing the labor market remains resilient, which also means the Federal Reserve has no urgent reason to cut rates in the short term.
Besides the rate meeting, several major events will also take place this week. Tech giants like Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon will successively release earnings reports, with AI capital expenditure and cloud business growth remaining market focal points; the fifth round of FTX’s approximately $900 million creditor compensation will also start on July 31, expected to bring new liquidity to the crypto market.
Against the backdrop of improving risk appetite, Bitcoin has climbed back above $65,000, but what truly determines whether the market can continue to rise is still the policy signals released by the Federal Reserve. If Powell maintains a hawkish stance, risk assets may come under pressure again; if more positive signals about future rate cuts are released, both the U.S. stock and crypto markets are likely to see a new round of rebounds. This week's focus is not just on the rate itself, but on the Federal Reserve's attitude toward the coming months.
$ETH $BTC $KAITO
#美联储周四凌晨公布利率决议 The pre-FOMC selloff in crypto reads more like tactical trimming than a directional break. BTC off 2.6%, ETH closer to 4%, but the move lacks the spot-led character that signals real distribution. Discretionary books are clearing risk before a binary macro event, which is rational positioning, not capitulation.
What makes this week harder to read is the AI and semis earnings cycle running concurrently with the Fed. Powell could hold rates while a CXMT-era memory entrant surprises on margins, or vice versa, and risk sentiment flips faster than the macro narrative can settle. When rate policy and earnings catalysts are misaligned like this, the sharper moves tend to come in the hours after Thursday's decision, not during it. The setup favors patience over conviction either direction.
Just my read, not advice.
#OKXOrbitThe sharp drop in SKYNIX is most likely due to Korea's new regulation set to take effect on July 31, limiting individual stock leverage to 20%. Once implemented, many people will be forced to close positions due to insufficient margin, forcing them to reduce their positions. I think this round of decline is coming to an end. The bottom has seen increased volume, and the rebound is fastThe Korean stock market triggered a circuit breaker today, triggered by the overnight collective panic over Nvidia's circular financing model.
This internal cycle game of the AI industry, which is self-selling and self-selling, is becoming increasingly unsustainable.
Market perception has completely reversed; NVIDIA is no longer simply seen as the sure-win shovel seller. In a sense, it has become the implicit guarantor behind the entire AI infrastructure debt chain.
But even if the market has fully seen through the risks of this approach, NVIDIA will find it hard to hit the brakes. Protecting OpenAI essentially means preserving the core of its own chips; they can only grit their teeth and continue operating this high-leverage closed loop.
Storm conduction knows no borders. The US stock market was just reacting first, while the Korean market, which is highly tied to the AI storage supply chain and heavily leveraged retail investors, was the first to collapse and plunge for everyone to see.
Disclaimer: These are market views only and do not constitute investment advice.l Those guys still stubbornly holding out on long $SPCX—I really admire them. IPO 135 dollars rushed in, rose to 225 but was reluctant to sell, now at 110 and still talking about "long-termism" and "Mars faith"—can faith really be a staple? Can Musk's Twitter account be revived?
Look at this trend: just over a month after listing, the price has been cut in half from 225, short positions have piled up to 32% of the circulating shares, $25 billion in ammunition is bombarding your face, and you're still "bottom-fishing" and "adding to positions." On August 6, when the wave of restrictions was lifted, 900 million shares were immediately dumped, which was $116 billion in selling pressure. Are you going to take the lead? This circulating share is less than 5%, and any major shareholder trying to cash out would cause the stock price to fall freely.
And even with Musk here, it doesn't work? Let me tell you, even if Musk really came, it wouldn't work either. This stock has a price-to-sales ratio of over 100 times, has been losing money continuously, with ROE negative 33%, and its valuation is supported entirely by the "space + AI" story. The story is over, but what about the money? Starlink does make money, but can it afford the Rockets, AI, and Twitter giants? What exactly did Cursor's 60 billion acquisition deal integrate into?
I'll go all out: SPCX is in double digits, and below 100 dollars is a sure thing. I've maxed out my short positions and leveraged enough. This wave of unlocking is my chance to strike rich. You guys keep chanting, I'll keep counting money. When SPCX drops to 80 or 90, don't say I didn't warn you—this stock isn't Tesla, no retail investors will rescue you, only institutions will dump the price.
Musk? Even if he comes, he'll fall and cry!Previously, exchanges competed on coin quantity, fees, and contract multiples.
Now let's start competing on who can cram stocks, derivatives, and crypto all into one account.
After Coinbase obtained the UK investment services license, it plans to allow local users to simultaneously access stocks, derivatives, and crypto assets on a single platform.
It is indeed more convenient for users.
But when things are placed together, it's also easier to misread:
Real stocks, tokenized stocks, and perpetual contracts may have similar names but hold completely different things.
In the future, when evaluating products, you can't just look at whose price they are in.
$COINLoaded with bullets. The wind is shifting.
Through the scope, the probability of passing the CLARITY Act was fading away like morning mist. The rumors released by Senate Majority Leader Thune are the slightest noticeable changes in air currents at the sniper position—he said there's no chance before the August recess. These are the ballistic parameters that must be calibrated before the ammunition is loaded.
Trump's $1.4 billion in cryptocurrency gains became the most eye-catching obstacle on the trajectory. Democrats and consumer groups present a clear outline of their targets through the scope, calling out that the ethical clause is too weak—the Department of Justice monopolizes enforcement power, indirectly holds ambiguous positions, and the timed fuse that automatically expires on January 20, 2029. Predicting a one-third pass rate at market pricing, this odds still don't meet the trigger threshold on my scale.
$XAMD, this target resembles a tracking bomb, and its trajectory closely matches the trajectory of this law. But at this moment, the tide suddenly shifted. The trajectory is deflecting.
My fingers hovered outside the trigger guard. The incubation period is extended, and the soil moisture makes my camouflage heavy with it, but that's discipline. Without a perfect profit-loss ratio, the cartridge casing must never be unchambered.
The goal is moving, but these political obstacles will gradually expose its flanks. I was waiting for the moment when the firing window contracted to the millimeter level.
Either shoot through its heart, or let the bullet stay in the magazine forever. #CLARITYActStalled The US stock market closed this morning was truly a "hot and cold world." The Dow Jones closed up 0.51% at 52,210 points, the Nasdaq fell 0.18% to 24,932 points, marking its fourth consecutive decline, while the S&P slightly gained 0.14%. On the surface, everything was calm, but internally, the sector was in turmoil—the semiconductor market was in turmoil, and Chinese concept stocks were broadly rising for the first time in a while. Overnight, the narrative shifted from "AI invincibility" to "AI peaking." 1. Semiconductor Crash: Philadelphia Semiconductor Plunges 5%, Chip Sector Becomes Monday's Most Fierce Battleground. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) fell 5.02% intraday, closing down 2.05% at 516 points. Nvidia fell 4.99% to $196.51, wiping out about $240 billion in a single day; AMD dropped 5.17%, ASML plunged 5.80%, and SanDisk plunged 11.02%. SK Hynix's ADR plunged 7.47%, falling below issue price just 12 days after listing, becoming the second major IPO this year after SpaceX to break issue price. Three triggers were ignited simultaneously: First, the big bear Bill Brian increased his shorting position. Michael Burry, the inspiration for the film "The Big Short," revealed on July 25 that he has expanded his short positions in Micron Technology while maintaining short positions in Tesla and Palantir. Burry's move has always been seen by the market as a "signal of a peak." Second, Changxin Technology's STAR Market listing is disrupting the memory chip landscape. Changxin surged nearly fivefold after its STAR Market debuted on Friday, sharply intensifying market expectations for independent replacement of Chinese memory chips, directly shaking the monopoly narrative of SK Hynix and Micron in the storage sector—if onlyThe weekend followed the rally in Trump's news, but don't be overly optimistic. History shows that Monday openings often erase such emotional gains.
Question: When the weekend's positive news cannot continue on Monday, has the market structure reached a critical point where the trend failed?
Key facts and data verification:
- Over the weekend, BTC maintained a rebound structure based on Trump-related news, but the sustainability of this trend is questionable.
- ETH has a higher short-term risk appetite than BTC, making it the leading mainstream coin this week.
- SOL has returned to the center of the meme coin narrative, with CATE being the fastest-gaining token yesterday.
- Macro level: The July FOMC window remains open, and market risk sentiment has risen.
- On-chain and project updates: Circle was finally approved by the OCC to become a national custodian bank, benefiting USDC's compliance; WEMIX was attacked again, with a contract vulnerability causing 5.22 million tokens to be minted and cross-chain to ETH and BSC; Storj Labs has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, but operations continue; BitMart banned withdrawals exceeding $25,000 within 24 hours, rumors have spread; South Korea's KOSPI index retreated 1.7% and turned negative.
Market Structure Changes and Pricing Impact:
- Derivatives positioning: Current leverage levels and funding rates are in a neutral to slightly hot state, but the weekend rally is more driven by news rather than actual liquidity inflow. If there is no sustained buying at Monday's open, high-leverage long positions will face liquidation risk, especially those chasing gains over the weekend.
- Expectations gap: Over the weekend, the market overpriced in the short-term impact of Trump-related news, but ignored the potential profit-taking and liquidity pulldown at Monday's open. This forms a typical scenario of "buying expectations, selling facts."
- Transmission logic: BTC's structural failure will first impact high-beta assets like ETH and SOL, as they carry higher risk premiums. If BTC fails to hold its weekend gains on Monday, altcoins may see even greater corrections, especially for fundamentally stressed stocks like WEMIX and STORJ.
Biased Multiple Paths and Conditions:
- If, after Monday's open, BTC can stabilize above the support level after the weekend rally, accompanied by funding rates retreating from highs to neutral territory, it indicates the market is digesting rather than reversing. At this point, ETH's leading rally may spread to mainstream coins, while SOL's MEME coin narrative is expected to continue attracting speculative capital.
Bearish risk and conditions:
- If BTC gives back weekend gains after Monday's opening and the funding rate quickly turns negative, the trend is confirmed to be invalid. This will trigger large-scale liquidations by high-leverage long positions, leading to an accelerated price decline. The security incident at WEMIX and withdrawal restrictions on BitMart may intensify market panic, while KOSPI's decline suggests a broad contraction in risk appetite.
Conclusion:
The weekend rally lacked liquidity confirmation from Monday's open, and the market is currently at a critical point where the trend is failing. A more cautious watch is to wait for BTC to hold its weekend gains after Monday's open, rather than betting on the trend to continue. For high-leverage positions, be wary of liquidation risks after market opening.
Discussion question: After Monday's open, do you think BTC can stabilize above $60,000, or will it give back all the weekend's gains?#停火预期兑现, WTI crude oil futures fell 8.68% in a single day
Crude oil plunged 8% overnight: Don't rush to fantasize about a ceasefire, this is just a stampede by quantitative funds taking the lead
Oil prices plunged 8% last night, and many people are once again shouting, "The Middle East is about to be peaceful, inflation is coming down, the Fed should cut rates and inject liquidity." Honestly, don't rush to get moved by yourself. This crash is far from a true trend reversal; it's purely a technical trampling of quantitative funds forced out by the news essay, who have blindly closed out their positions.
The direct trigger behind this sell-off was the U.S. and Iran responding to Pakistan and Qatar's proposals to resume negotiations. Geopolitical premiums are indeed being squeezed out, but this is only a temporary stimulus from the news side.
Diplomatic negotiations have always been a tug-of-war, a "two steps forward, one step back." Today it's talks of negotiation, tomorrow the details can't be agreed upon, or there is some conflict on site, and oil prices that have gone too far can suddenly rebound at any moment. Expecting a ceasefire to be certain with a single short statement is too naive.
To take another step back, even if oil prices really fall, the Fed won't immediately pivot. The drop in oil prices only affected the headline CPI; Powell's group was still focused on services inflation and core PCE. With the Treasury yield still fixed at 4.7%, the liquidity taps have not been turned on at all. The macro-level tightening logic hasn't changed—don't dream of lavish monetary easing.
For the crypto world, in the stagnant stock competition, a few dollars in crude oil drops simply can't bring in new capital. If you watch US stocks rebound by two points, then recklessly leverage to chase long positions after crude oil crashes, it's very easy to be proven wrong on both sides during the intense volatility before next week's FOMC meeting.
To be specific, what should I do in the face of this crash:
I currently hold a single long position related to crude oil, and I certainly won't enter based on instinct before the bearish candle closes.
If WTI shows a 15-minute level double volume dipping near $68.5 and there is a clear bullish divergence, I will test the waters with a light 3% position in my account, with a stop-loss firmly set at $67.8. With less than $0.7 risk, they are betting on a short-term sentiment correction rebound to a P/E ratio of $71.5.
But if the trading volume surges and it breaks through the $68 mark during trading, I won't even try—I'd rather miss the rebound than rush to become a quick 'smash' in the algorithm stage.
In the face of a real trend, it doesn't matter if you make a little less on a rebound; the safety of your bottom position is more important than anything else.#CXMTDebutShockwave CXMT's STAR Market Debut Just Changed the DRAM Pricing Game
CXMT debuted on Shanghai's STAR Market on July 27, surging over 460% to a 3.3 trillion yuan valuation on day one, making it China's most valuable A-share company. Asia's biggest IPO of 2026. Big numbers. But the real story is timing.
One week before CXMT listed, Samsung and SK Hynix locked in a $950 billion AI chip megadeal, anchoring them as the default memory suppliers for the AI compute buildout through 2030. Nvidia, Anthropic, Broadcom, all in. The message was clear: the world's AI memory stack runs through Seoul.
CXMT's listing doesn't flip that overnight, but it adds a variable. CXMT holds roughly 7.7% of global DRAM market share, currently 4th globally, with ambitions for 3rd. A freshly capitalised Chinese memory player with $8.6 billion in IPO proceeds and a mandate to scale is now a structural factor in DRAM contract pricing. That's supply economics, not speculation.
Two things to watch: DRAM contract prices in H2 2026, and how fast CXMT actually deploys that capital into capacity. The stock pop was historic, but the gap between a listing valuation and real market share is where most of the risk lives. Korea's supply chain is locked in with the biggest AI buyers on the planet. Closing that headstart takes years, not months.
The global memory market now has two competing gravity wells. Pricing gets more contested from here.
\Does CXMT's debut actually move the needle on DRAM contract prices, or is Korea's headstart too entrenched to matter near-term?
Share your thoughts in the comments 👇