Orbit Post Sitemap
BTC climbed back up from below $58,000 at the end of June to around $64,000, and market sentiment quickly recovered. But if you only look at the price, it's easy to jump to an early conclusion: the bear market is over, and institutional funds are re-entering the market. The latest ETF funding data paints a more complex picture. From July 20 to 22, US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net inflows for three consecutive days, totaling about $499 million; Immediately after, there was a net outflow of about $225 million on July 23, followed by another outflow of about $240 million on July 24. In other words, the inflows accumulated over the first three days were withdrawn by about $465 million in the following two trading days. This is not "institutions have already fled," nor is it "institutions firmly bottom-fishing." It's more like telling us: funds are trading this rebound, but haven't yet formed a consensus, sustained direction. The real watershed was not the $64,000 Glassnode listing around $69,000 as the short-term holder cost line in its July 22 on-chain report. Why is this location important? Because the average cost of a group of buyers entering the market in recent months is nearby. When the price approaches from the lower upwards, some trapped individuals are close to breaking even, naturally creating selling pressure. The report also points out that there is strong demand around $63,000, with about one-tenth of supply recently changing hands in this area. In other words今晚社区话题特别碎
马斯克又在细化AI时间表
说十年内智能差距会拉成
人与黑猩猩那种量级
Anthropic那边有人阴阳黄仁勋
开源倡议听着美
CUDA驱动是不是也该开源
抬杠声一浪接一浪
地缘线也没消停
谈判有进展的消息
和强硬表态轮流上热搜
广场像被切成三块屏幕
你刷新三次
能看到三种世界
结果呢
价格不配合戏剧
BTC 64513
小涨
资金费率贴零
持仓量还在
可没有狂欢式拥挤
情绪指标大概五买零卖
偏多却克制
这种社区状态我很熟
叫夹心层
乐观的人在讲未来十年
悲观的人在讲战争罪行
交易的人只问
周一开盘谁先动
眼线画歪可以重画
仓位画歪要收手续费
社区越碎
越不该把评论区共识
当成自己的交易系统
CZ谈关所后门
BitMart余波还在
也给社区加了一层不信任滤镜
信任问题升温时
费率冷其实是好事
说明还没集体上头
所以我的判断是
社区情绪现在不构成单边燃料
碎片化等于噪声升高
我降低看评论区频率
提高看位置和杠杆频率
趋势没确认前
少参与立场站队
多保留现金弹性
正好今天还有几个热点值得一说：
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
RWA永续把传统资产交易搬进链上衍生品层，社区爱讲「传统金融来了」，价格却更认准费率与真实份额。四千七百亿是规模信号，不是让你去买无关勾兑币的许可证。我会把话题热度与持仓结构分开看，热度高时反而减一点噪音仓。
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
质押队列变化会在ETH社区里被解读成超级利多，短线往往过头。归零降低退出冲击，不等于立刻开启主升。社区叙事偏快、价格偏慢时，最容易追在情绪峰。我选择把队列当中期供需笔记，不把社群口号写成加仓理由。
#三星Galaxy钱包将原生支持稳定币
消费电子巨头碰稳定币，社区容易直接脑补大众采用爆发。现实路径仍受合规地区与用户习惯约束，热度会先于数据。我欢迎入口变宽，但仓位只跟流通和使用指标，不跟发布会弹幕。
$BTC $ETH #社区情绪 #噪声Originally, I was shopping to try on clothes, But I spent half an hour staring at the disc in the fitting room
The mirror is me
The phone contained a list of negative factors
Both sides are quite glaring
If you were to flood the headlines now,
Able to write an article titled "The World Is Ending"
CLARITY was sad before the recess
ETFs are still seeing about 225 million yuan in outflows recently
Iran's leadership still made tough statements
Right next to the détente news were war crime allegations
Then guess what
BTC closed near 64,513
In 24 hours, it rose by 0.71%.
ETH is tougher
By 1885
Up about one and a half points
Sentiment indicators are about 5 buys, small sells, and 6 holds
A bit more than fanatical
Oil prices have softened first
The headline mapping failed once again
It's not that the negative news has disappeared
It's because the market price is too lazy anymore
Respond perfectly to every threat
In the fitting room, I tried on three coats
I didn't buy a single one
Instead, they put the old 'bad news must fall' old garment
Took it off
The real point of anti-consensus lies here
Traditional markets close on weekends
Crypto sets its own prices
It chose to digest tail risk drawdowns
Instead of pairing it with the square horror story
The funding rate is still stuck at zero
This shows that no one dares to turn anti-consensus into a celebration
So my judgment is
Counter-consensus is not mindless longing
It is about refusing to let headlines hold you hostage
The list of negative factors remains
I keep a spot mindset and keep leverage low
Even if it's green, I don't chase
Even if scared, they wouldn't chop the floor
The fitting room decided to void it
Leave trading decisions for periods with better liquidity
There are a few more noteworthy topics today, so let's talk about them together:
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
Progress in negotiations and suspension of airstrikes have indeed weakened the most extreme transport disruption premiums, and the price drop is a vote of the market's foot. But the tough stance remains, and repeated paths will allow clickbait to repeatedly harvest emotions. I treat easing as volatility downgrade, and I don't write the word 'ceasefire' as a permanent long license.
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
AI orders can boost equity risk appetite, but they don't explain why crypto is more sensitive to certain regulatory heads—the two are parallel narratives. Crossover effects are often delayed and harder to verify on weekends. I only treat the chip large order as a peripheral thermometer, with the main logic still focused on the position of the big chip and lever congestion.
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信, it has received endorsement from industry collectives
The open source open letter is highly popular, easily leading people to mistakenly believe that technology risk assets need a comprehensive revaluation, but the market has shown a modest rally. The gap in expectations is here: the story is perfect, but the price only passes. I choose to trust price action more than the sentiment of the press release, and anti-consensus positions should be held in batches.
$BTC $ETH #反共识 #标题党短短一周之内，CLARITY法案获得通过的市场预期大幅崩塌。
市场当前定价显示，该法案在2026年内顺利落地的概率仅有37%。本周二这一数值尚且维持在42%，而今年春季，市场一度认为法案通过概率高于80%。银河研究（Galaxy Research）也在上周五下调了自身预期，将法案通过概率从本月早些时候预估的50%下调至30%。
这项法案被市场视作美国加密行业里程碑式监管框架，一旦落地，将会以成文法律形式巩固比特币的数字商品定位，长期消除监管政策反复变动的风险，进一步扫清大型机构配置$BTC 的障碍，此前比特币的不少阶段性上涨行情，都提前计价了这份政策乐观预期。如今法案通过预期快速降温，意味着市场需要逐步消化这部分政策溢价，监管不确定性再度成为压制比特币价格的中长期隐患。
参议院多数党领袖苏恩对外表态，他并不指望法案能在八月休会期到来之前迎来最终投票，不过他仍希望推动法案进入参议院全院审议流程。一旦错过八月休会前的窗口期，立法进程大概率大幅延后，政策利好兑现时间将持续拉长。
该法案想要正式生效，需要集齐60张赞成票。目前共和党在参议院仅掌握53个席位，票数缺口显著，想要突破阻挠议事规则，必须争取多名民主党议员跨党派支持，当下谈判难度远超市场春季时期的乐观预估。Many crypto investors have noticed that whenever the MEME sector rebounds, the first thing investors target is often $PEPE. Compared to the endless variety of native dogs, this little frog always manages to attract market attention repeatedly. Today, let's talk about its underlying logic and hidden pitfalls. First, background summary: PEPE was born in 2023, relying on the viral sad frog meme meme that went viral online, becoming the pioneer of the new wave of MEME. Unlike early DOGE and SHIB, it launches fairly, does not involve institutional private funding, and quickly attracts retail investors through meme culture, sparking a frog-themed meme craze across the internet. As a leading meme coin in the Ethereum ecosystem, its greatest advantage is its moderate market cap + top-tier liquidity. Unlike SHIB, which is massive and requires massive capital to surge; Moreover, compared to the endless small Dogou traders, trading depth is abundant, so entering and exiting the market won't slip easily, making speculative funds especially favored for short-term trading. Let's talk about the core logic of the current market: MEME funds always prefer the new and discard the old, but most new coins have very short lifespans and lose their hype within days. Whenever a new round of Dogecoin speculation ends, funds seeking safer speculative targets will flow back into PEPE. The market pattern is very clear: there is no long-term slow bull market; the market moves entirely according to market speculation. When the overall market's risk appetite increases and retail investors are willing to gamble, it surges rapidly; When capital shifts to narratives like AI and RWA, the hype fades, and prices quickly fall. Many people fall into a common misconception: treating PEPE as an asset to be accumulated long-term. It must be made clear: PEPE has no business launch, no ecosystem sustained returns, noRecently, BitMEX announced it would cease operations, and BitMart began to withdraw.
Just looking at one exchange shutting down doesn't say much, but as similar incidents become more common, it's worth reconsidering:
How many real new users and new capital do these industries actually have?
Just because an industry moves from incremental to stock doesn't mean it will disappear.
It's just that the old "everyone has something to eat" phase is coming to an end.
What is more likely to be seen next is the clearing of the weak, concentration of the top, and competition for existing stocks.
At the same time, traditional finance is also continuously entering the crypto space, and competition from native exchanges will only become fiercer in the future.
So sometimes, what's more important than predicting tomorrow's rise or fall is clearly understanding what stage the industry is currently in.
Price is the result; structural changes often happen earlier. Jumped 25% instantly! You told me it was a rebound? This is the main ascent wave! $BERA this move was so sudden, a bullish candlestick jumped straight up, and everyone in the group was asking what exactly happened. I checked on-chain news, and the first phase of the PoL Next upgrade has officially started. Simply put, Berachain wants to change the dual-token model, retire BGT directly, and from now on, all rewards across the network will be settled using WBERA. This change is huge—it completely overturns the old 'stake BGT to earn rewards' old system. Don't panic yet; I actually think this is a positive development. Veteran miners understand that although BGT offers a lot, liquidity is poor and monetization is troublesome, so the long-term lock-up experience is really poor. Now switching to WBERA means opening up the reward channel, allowing you to deposit and swap anytime, and retail investors can play too. Previously, during the BGT era, many people were afraid to enter because the operation was too complicated. Now, the entry barrier has been cut in half. The market is currently chaotic—some are dumping shares and selling off positive news, while others are frantically buying to gamble on new mechanisms. I think don't chase highs in the short term, but those with positions can hold steady and see if TVL can explode once new pools open. If TVL doubles, then breaking through previous highs for $BERA really isn't just a dream. That said, the PoL mechanism itself is Berachain's core moat. This time, changing the underlying economic model is an upgrade to put it nicely, but to put it bluntly, it's a bit risky. After all, the old BGT miners might not be willing; if their interests are passive, everyone will be scolded. But the market bought this account, and candlesticks don't lie. The current sentiment is straightforward—funds are presentMajority Party Leader Threatens: CLARITY Difficult to Pass Before Adjournment, What Should OKX Users Think?
Just now, Senate Majority Leader John Thune made it clear that the likelihood of the CLARITY Act passing before the August recess is very low.
This news has had an impact on the global crypto market, especially for users trading on OKX, and it's worth a careful analysis.
Why is the CLARITY Act important to OKX users?
The core of the CLARITY Act is to clearly define regulatory boundaries for the U.S. digital asset market—specifying which are under SEC oversight and what is under CFTC, providing a clearer compliance framework for spot trading, derivatives, and stablecoins.
For a global trading platform like OKX, the direction of U.S. regulation directly impacts:
Institutional capital willingness to enter the US dollar stablecoin liquidity environment requires long-term asset pricing logic with high compliance requirements
If the bill passes smoothly, the certainty in the U.S. market will increase, and institutional funds will be more willing to participate; If delays continue, the regulatory ambiguity period will lengthen, and funds will remain on the sidelines, suppressing volatility and risk appetite.
The current time window is already very tight
Thun's statement basically confirmed reality:
The Senate is expected to enter a summer recess in early August, and with midterm elections approaching, political priorities will shift rapidly. Even if debates can begin, completing all procedures before the recess will be extremely difficult. Although the latest text includes an ethical clause (restricting senior officials from issuing crypto assets), Democrats still need at least seven cross-party votes, and so far, no clear breakthrough in the vote base is visible.
The actual impact on OKX traders
Short-term sentiment: The news is bearish, but the market has already priced in some 'delays before the recess,' so the probability of a sharp drop is low, and the rebound is mainly suppressed.
Medium-term logic: Regulatory uncertainty continues, institutional large funds will remain cautious, putting sustained pressure on high-beta knockoffs and small- and mid-cap projects.
Trading Perspective: Mainstream coins and trading pairs on OKX remain highly liquid, but overall risk appetite may continue to lean defensively.
How to respond?
Don't assume "the bill will definitely pass" as a prerequisite for the deal; the current probability has clearly decreased.
Watching whether the September session can restart and advance will be the next key window of observation.
The CLARITY Act has been in place for a long time, and now what's really stuck isn't the technical provisions, but timing and politics. Thun's words effectively gave the market a heads-up: stop treating "immediate implementation" as a short-term catalyst.
For OKX users, the most pragmatic attitude is to treat regulation as a long-term variable, not as a short-term trading signal. Risk control and strategic planning should still be done at your own pace. #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
The US and Iran respond to the peace talks proposal! Geopolitical breakthroughs are good for oil prices, but don't treat negotiations like a thirst-quenching spring
Today (26th), Sputnik Arab and Saudi media reported in succession that the United States and Iran have officially responded to Pakistan and Qatar's proposal to resume negotiations.
Once the news broke, many trading groups started to stir again, feeling that "the most dangerous moment in the Middle East is over, and risk assets are about to fly away." To be honest, seeing this logic of rushing in and leveraging high leverage based on a geopolitical essay, I can only remind you: equating diplomatic negotiation responses directly with liquidity floods in the crypto market is a typical macro misalignment.
From the perspective of traders on the market, let's carefully analyze the truth behind the resumption of US-Iran negotiations:
First, the U.S.-Iran responded to the negotiations by squeezing out the "geopolitical war premium" from Brent crude when it sprinted to $100. While the drop in crude oil does help ease medium- and long-term inflationary pressures, the transmission chain is extremely long—from falling oil prices, to CPI data reflecting it, and then to the Fed changing its stance at policy meetings, there is at least one or two quarters of macroeconomic lag in between.
Second, geopolitical easing cannot resolve the unresolved decisions by the Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan next week. Next week, we will face the FOMC rate decision, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield firmly stuck at 4.7%. The Federal Reserve, the largest source of liquidity, has not yet been tapped; the average daily inflow of on-chain stablecoins remains at a nearly one-year low, and the market remains brutally contested through stock accumulation.
Third, diplomatic negotiations themselves are a long tug-of-war of interests. Pakistan's mediation between Pakistan and Qatar is just the beginning; subsequent issues involving sanctions lifting, nuclear facility supervision, and detailed rules for strait navigation safety could be repeated and twisted at any time. The biggest feature of geopolitical news is its high volatility and easy reversal. Using it as leverage results in a very low win rate.
My conclusion: The U.S.-Iran response to the peace talks is good for macro deinflation, but it is by no means the cure for a short-term surge in the crypto market. Before U.S. Treasury yields back and off-exchange incremental funds have not entered, any upward surge without volume is a trap for a bullish shakeout.
In terms of operations, I don't recommend rushing to leverage and go long just because you see news about peace talks. Rather than betting on the details of geopolitical negotiations, it's better to calm down and wait for next week's FOMC decision to see the real flow of funds before making any plans.
Do you think the US and Iran can reach a substantive agreement this time under Qatar's mediation? Let's talk in the comments.#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
I am the mid-term intelligence guy.
The Ethereum validator exit queue has dropped to zero. I've been watching this chain for almost a year—last September, the peak of 2.67 million ETH queued to exit was a panic sell-off at a high point; now that it's zero, it means "those who wanted to sell have already sold," and what's left are institutional treasuries, ETFs, and long-term nodes holding locked positions.
But don't get carried away. Exit queue zeroing ≠ immediate price surge; it only proves one thing: the endogenous selling pressure has been cleared in stages, and the market has shifted from "self-destructive realization" to "trading time for space." On the other side, the entry queue is stacked with about 2.48 million ETH, waiting 43 days. The supply-demand gap looks bullish, but queued entry does not equal new buying demand; much of it is existing ETH being re-staked, so don't directly equate "staking demand" with "price increase."
Mid-term judgment: The on-chain ETH chip structure is cleaner than in Q1, with a staking rate of 33.5%+ hitting a historic high, providing a floor below; but a real price breakout still depends on macro liquidity and whether L2 fees can hold. This signal means "the bottom is stable," not a "charge signal," so don't go all-in just because of one queue data point.
$ETH Clearing away the dust from clay tablets on the Mesopotamian plains three thousand years ago, the alliances and rivalries of the Far Eastern silicon kingdom before our eyes are nothing but a cliché of the Assyrian Empire and the Hittites vying for bronze ore veins!
When the two major high-bandwidth memory minting giants on the Korean Peninsula—Samsung and Hynix—were deeply bound on the same day by a long-term supply agreement and strategic heavy investment with the AI giant Ansoropic, it seemed even the dust on the archaeologist’s desk was shaken off by this bloody storm. I seemed to smell the urgency before the Peloponnesian War, when major city-states frantically stockpiled iron ore and grain. More intriguingly, Ansoropic’s new flagship model Opus 5, with performance approaching the extreme, was priced at half the cost. This is by no means an act of charity but a common historical pattern of “cheap iron strangling expensive bronze” — in the Roman military records, whoever could feed double the legions with half the grain could use their military edge to conquer all the city-states around the Mediterranean.
Meanwhile, the computing power pope Nvidia injected a billion dollars into Naver to build a computing fortress and joined forces with SK Group to construct an energy Great Wall reaching two gigawatts. This mirrors the imperial projects of Caesar in the first century BC, who built Roman roads, massive aqueducts, and underground granaries on the Gallic frontier. Computing power has long ceased to be a mere commodity and has evolved into the “imperial salt and iron monopoly” of the new era. When production capacity and electricity become insurmountable war barriers, veteran Intel surged over thirteen percent after its quarterly report, with Qualcomm following suit—these seemingly decaying ancient foundries are drawing their swords anew amid the ruins, signaling the entire industry’s shift from illusory bubble revelry to a bloody and brutal “capacity arms race.”
On the capital market’s reflected chain, the token $XPLTR, backed by an intelligence analysis giant, is the most insidious “imperial secret guard” in this new era arms race. As AI infrastructure is completely locked down by Far Eastern wafer fabs and North American warlord giants, the turbulence $XPLTR transmits on the secondary market carries not just corporate financial figures on paper but the fervent premium triggered by the empire’s intelligence network as it dams computing power. Just as the chief Roman spies sold military secrets to the Senate for gold coins, today’s speculators bet on tokens on the digital chain to gamble on war dividends. The deep human greed for power and information monopoly has not changed a bit over thousands of years.
There is nothing new under the sun. Whether it was the Phoenicians’ spice routes three thousand years ago, the California gold rush in the nineteenth century, or today’s high-bandwidth memory and gigawatt-scale clusters racing ahead, the essence of the frenzy is always the violent monopoly of scarce resources by the powerful capitalists. When the last wafer pipeline is laid, the fervent speculators will ultimately realize they have only paid a high minting tax once again on this empire’s ruins built of silicon wafers and tokens, for the ancient human weaknesses! #KoreaAIChipPush Unlike many little local dogs
$DOGE No team or investors unlocking chips to smash the market is its advantage
But the shortcomings are also obvious: no upper limit on total volume, continuous issuance, and a lack of scarce narrative
Moreover, new memes are constantly emerging in the market, continuously diverting retail investors' funds
It is difficult to replicate the sustained surges seen in earlier years🎭 Green candles? Don't rush in!
The surface was covered in a sea of red and green
But on-chain data says: funds haven't been left 👇
SHIB +22% 🌚
SPEPE +3.7% 🤷
KITE -3.9% 💀
SLRC -6.2% 📉
This is not the knockoff season
This is the rotating harvester at work 🚜
What about the institutions?
SETH +0.38%, 🐢 steady as an old dog, but no increased positions
AAVE -2% / NEAR -1.2% — momentum has ❄️ cooled
ADA +1.2% — Today was really tough 💪
🧠 The conclusion is simple:
Don't follow the crowd, follow the money.
Gold and dust, you must distinguish yourself.
#资金流向 #ADA #不是每个反弹都叫反转刚做完指甲不方便打字，但这个行情我必须说
指甲还没干
推送一条接一条
全是「又出事了」那种标题
我一边吹干一边冒火
游戏公链WEMIX
被传疑似安全漏洞
损失大约七十万美元
数字不算史上最大
可它提醒你一件事
安全事故不挑市值排名
专挑你松懈的时候
然后你猜怎么着
CZ出来评BitMart关停
说关掉一家中心化交易所并不容易
还担心前团队留后门
这话比任何口号都硬
关所不等于清场结束
系统权限和历史接口
才是暗处的雷
再叠上前几天AFX一类攻击的余波
黑客换仓搬砖的故事还在链上流传
你就会明白
链上透明是双刃剑
坏事也会被直播
大饼今晚还在64513附近绿着
好像什么都没发生
可安全事件从来不是靠K线消化
它吃的是信任和习惯
谁还把「有审计截图」当免死金牌
谁就在给下一回埋伏笔
我指甲不方便打字
更没心情去追所谓黑客概念币
那种东西热度来得快
留下的只有转账失败记录
所以我的判断是
安全模块要从一次性审计
改成持续监控和权限收敛
CEX层面听CZ的提醒
关停与交接本身就是风险事件
个人层面少批无限授权
桥和偏门合约能不碰就不碰
绿盘改变不了我的偏执
顺便唠几个热门话题🚨 BREAKING: 🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran Signals It Will Halt Attacks If The US Keeps Strikes Paused
A possible off-ramp. Iran says it will stop its attacks as long as the US maintains the pause in its military operations. This follows the US holding off on new strikes for the first time in nearly two weeks, after 13 straight days of bombing Iranian targets.
Why it matters for markets is the oil chain. This conflict has kept a floor under crude by threatening the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway carrying a fifth of the world's oil. Every escalation pushed oil up, which revived inflation fear, which kept the Fed boxed in on rate cuts and pressured risk assets like Bitcoin. A genuine pause reverses that. Softer oil eases inflation worry, and that is the friendly setup crypto has been waiting for into the July 29 Fed meeting.
Here is the honest part, and it's essential. This exact scenario has played out three times already this year. Ceasefires in April, June, and again in July all collapsed within days, each time sending oil spiking and markets lower. The pause is a de-escalation signal, not a resolution. Netanyahu visits Trump next week, Trump has already threatened more strikes, and the mediators have watched every prior truce unravel.
What to watch:
Whether the pause holds through Netanyahu's visit and into next week.
Oil's reaction, and whether Bitcoin can reclaim $65K on the relief.
A ceasefire signal is genuinely good news, but this conflict has burned every optimist who bought it as permanent. Trade the confirmation, not the headline, and keep risk tight into an event that has flipped overnight before.
Does this pause finally hold, or crack like every truce before it?
Not financial advice. $BTC $CL $BZ Real-time market overview 🖥️
$SHIB suddenly erupted on July 26, becoming the focus of the market. The price surged sharply from around $0.0000042, reaching an intraday high of $0.0000058, marking a more than two-month high. At the time of writing, SHIB was fluctuating around $0.0000056, with a 24-hour increase of as much as 35.37%. Trading volume expanded simultaneously, with market capitalization surging by about $1 billion in a single day. South Korea's Upbit exchange has become the main source of buying, and SHIB has reestablished its position as the "second-largest meme coin by market capitalization."
---
Key support and resistance levels 📊
After five consecutive massive 4-hour candlestick spikes, the price has broken through several short-term resistance levels. The RSI surged to the extreme overbought zone at 79.88. The daily chart shows SHIB testing the 200-day moving average near $0.0000050.
Resistance levels: 0.0000058 - 0.0000060 (intraday high and integer level); 0.0000067 (May high, strong medium-term resistance); 0.00000628 (Key support lost in May, now turning into resistance).
Support below: 0.0000050 (200-day moving average and psychological barrier); 0.0000045 (Previous resistance, turned to support after breakout); 0.00000412 (June low and last line of support for bulls).
---
On-chain market players and capital movements 🐋
Whale Re-enters: A SHIB whale that has been dormant for about six months has resumed accumulating, buying over 30 billion SHIB for approximately $125,000.
Exchange reserves hit a historic low: SHIB reserves on centralized exchanges have dropped to about 86.1 trillion, a historic low. In recent weeks, SHIB holdings on exchanges have continued to decline, and selling pressure may be easing.
Mysterious whales locked up for a long time: a whale cluster that has held about 103 trillion SHIB since 2020 (accounting for 8.51% of total supply) has not been sold off on a large scale to date.
Contract shorts were washed out: During this rally, about 2,300 traders were liquidated, totaling approximately $6 million, with shorts accounting for about $5 million.
---
Positive factors ✨
Burn rate surges 3200%: SHIB's burn rate surged over 3200% in the past 24 hours, about 500% weekly. The cumulative burned amount has exceeded 410.84 trillion, with the original supply down by 41.08%.
Korean retail investors are buying frenziedly: SHIB's trading volume on South Korea's Upbit exchange is almost on par with Binance, with KRW trading pairs accounting for over 10% of global trading and showing a slight premium over the US dollar market.
Whales resume accumulating: whales who had been dormant for half a year are buying again, combined with exchange reserves hitting historic lows—the dual tightening on the supply side creates strong supply and demand support.
---
Bearish factors ⚠️
Technical indicators are overbought across the board: RSI reached 79.88, %B value as high as 1.44 (price well above the upper Bollinger Band). Historically, there is a high probability of mean reversion within 1-3 trading days after such extreme readings.
Trading volume does not match gains: Binance spot trading volume is only $42.9 million. For a 32% gain, this volume is clearly low, more like amplification caused by thin liquidity.
KOL Collective Silence: SHIB surged over 30% in a single day, but mainstream crypto opinion leaders collectively remained silent—historically, this silence often appears at the top of peak candles.
---
Comprehensive assessment 🧐
$SHIB is currently in an extremely overbought state, following a typical short squeeze rally. Frenzied buying by Korean retail investors, whale accumulation, and a 3200% surge in burn rates have all acted as strong short-term catalysts. However, technical signals such as an RSI close to 80, a %B as high as 1.44, and mismatched trading volume and gains are all warning signs—CoinCodex forecasts a year-end target of only $0.0000034, about 18% lower than the current level. In the short term, watch if 0.0000050 can hold: If the sideways movement with shrinking volume cools the overbought indicator, there is a chance to re-attack 0.0000058-0.0000060; if it falls back quickly, the first support below is at 0.0000045. Chasing at higher prices carries great risk; it is recommended to wait for stabilization signals after a pullback.
The above analysis is based on publicly available market data and does not constitute any investment advice. Please assess the risks yourself. #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #美军暂停对伊空袭, progress in the Strait navigation negotiations #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard Sisters, my hands were shaking while putting on makeup today
Not because of a date
But because I came across a set of "slow money" data
My hand trembled and my eyeliner got smudged
Over at Hyperliquid
HYPE cumulative burn is about 47,270,000 tokens
Approximately 4.73% of the maximum supply
Burning is not just a market manipulation tactic
It's a real supply-side slimming down
And guess what
The Ethereum validator exit queue
Has dropped close to zero
Those who wanted to leave have mostly left
Staking-side pressure is easing up
Hayes is still buying ETH
Recently accumulated about 3,900 tokens
Putting these three things together
The picture is clear
Some are locking
Some are burning
Some are quietly moving spot assets
Not the kind of hype you hear in the square
About doubling tonight
BTC is still hovering around 64,513
ETF recent readable data still shows outflows of about 225 million
Institutional ledgers are cold
On-chain slow money is relatively warm
Two clocks running simultaneously
Easiest to make impatient people do the opposite
I used to treat staking and burning
As bull market side dishes
Now they feel more like ballast stones in a choppy market
They don’t guarantee a rise tomorrow
But they punish you for putting all your positions
On weekend sentiment
My hands are shaking while putting on makeup
Mostly from FOMO
Not a signal
What should really shake is
Whether you’ve confused leverage with slow money
So my judgment is
Slow money is suitable for base position logic
Not for ultra-short-term ignition
HYPE burn and ETH queue zeroing
I will keep them on my mid-term watchlist
Positioning will continue to favor spot and low leverage
Leave the "shaking hands" to makeup
Not to the open position button
I glanced at today’s news, a few points to mention:
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信，获行业集体背书
The open-source initiative has pushed AI narrative back to the center of public opinion, but the competition between computing power and model routes may not immediately turn into crypto buying pressure. Slow money prefers cash flow and lock-up structures, not the hype of an open letter. I treat this as a backdrop for tech risk appetite; main position logic still focuses on BTC levels and ETH staking supply and demand.
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
RWA perpetual volume hitting $470 billion shows that after traditional assets go on-chain, there really is a trading layer, not just a custody narrative. Like burning and staking, it belongs to the "slow structure," winning on sustainability and fees, not weekend sentiment pulses. I will track share and basis, not speculate on unknown altcoins just because of the RWA acronym.
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
Queue zeroing reduces recent concerns about concentrated exits, a plus for ETH mid-term supply and demand, but short-term still depends on overall market risk appetite. Hayes’ continued buying looks more like high-net-worth cash flow voting, not retail slogans. My approach is to treat ETH as a slow position to observe, not to chase a queue number with high leverage over the weekend.
$ETH $BTC #慢钱 #质押A friend said he knew a giant whale, But that giant whale turned out to be himself
When he showed off screenshots of his holdings to me,
I didn't see Fuying at first glance
Let's first look at funding rates
Because this is the most honest thing
And what happened?
BTC perpetual fees are only a little over 0.01%.
Converting to annual discounts isn't scary either
ETH is about an order of magnitude
SOL is slightly higher
Nor is it a feverish crowd
BTC contract positions on OKX
Approximately 31,700 units
This amounts to around 2 billion US dollars
The quantity is still there
But the temperature wasn't high
This combination has a name
I privately call it cold leverage
The position is still hanging
But no one dared to bet heavily on the direction
Weekends are more likely to become fee collectors
And the price
Big Cake 64513
A slight increase of 0.7%.
ETH1885
SOL is almost 75
The candlestick looks decent
But the rates tell you
This isn't just everyone going all-in together Trend in the night
My friend's 'I'm the whale'
Most likely, it's a hot illusion added to the cold market
The screenshot is beautiful
It does not equal crowding supporting the trend
Once Monday's external variable flipped
The first to suffer are those with low rates but heavy positions
U.S.-Iran easing has eased oil prices first
Risk appetite has picked up
But the rate doesn't match the attack script
Explain the smarter money
I'd rather see Monday verification
Not on Sunday nights to the max
So my judgment is
The futures market is now suitable for downsizing
It's not suitable to leverage based on intuition
Discount rates to zero and increase holdings
The biggest fear is a false breakout and a real stop-loss
I only kept Kocang for trial and error
The main warehouse continues to focus on spot trading
The phrase "I know the whale"
Deleted from the trading log
And by the way, let's take a look at what everyone has been talking about lately:
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
If the bill's progress is further delayed, contract trading usually cuts event gambling positions first, and the rate discount actually means the same thing: no one wants to pay a high cost of funding for an uncertain calendar. Regulatory gaps will prolong the volatility period and do not equate to a one-sided crash order. I will treat CLARITY as a source of volatility, not betting on the recess narrative.
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
Geopolitical easing is most directly impacted by oil prices and risk premiums. It's reasonable for crypto to rise slightly over the weekend, but the rate not rising suggests that leverage remains cautious. If ceasefires or negotiations are repeated, it is most likely to cause back-and-forth losses on the contract side. In terms of trading, I'd rather express optimism with spot trading than push the multiplier up in a news vacuum.
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
AI hardware orders can boost risk appetite, but it's hard for crypto funding rates to be directly raised over the weekend—the clocks for these two are fundamentally different. The heated equity narrative and cold contract sentiment are typical cross-market misalignments. I only treat the chip orders as background warmth, not as "tonight should go twenty times."
$BTC $SOL #合约费率 #冷杠杆我室友半夜偷偷开合约被我抓到了
他屏幕亮着
我以为在刷短视频
凑近一看全是仓位颜色
我人都无语了
今晚尾盘消息更吵
一边有人往交易所搬筹码
一边有人在链上继续吸
然后你猜怎么着
TRUMP相关团队
把大约两千一百九十四万美元代币
存进了中心化交易所
这种动作市场第一反应就是
可能要卖
至少是流动性准备
另一边
有巨鲸过去一周增持约一百五十八万枚LINK
大概一千三百二十万美元量级
Arthur Hayes又买了六百多枚ETH
近期累计增持大概三千九百多枚
同一块屏幕
抛压预期和吸筹信号并列
最容易把人做成来回打脸
我室友那种半夜偷开
最怕的就是这种分裂市
消息面每个都能讲出故事
价格却只肯给你窄幅波动
BTC还在64513附近
ETH1885
SOL快75
像故意折磨手痒的人
大饼资金费率贴零
说明杠杆没在疯狂站队
异动更多是个券和地址行为
不是指数级别趋势切换
所以我的判断是
尾盘异动要拆开看
进所不等于立刻砸盘
吸筹也不等于明天拉升
我自己的规矩是
不跟单名人地址情绪
只把大额进出当风险提示
仓位继续偏现货
把室友那套半夜梭哈从我电脑里卸载掉
说回大盘之外的热点，今天这几个事儿有点意思：
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
退出队列归零，意味着想撤的质押压力阶段性缓和，排队进入的叙事又开始被拿出来讲。ETH今天相对更强一点，和「锁仓意愿回稳」能对上部分逻辑，但价格弹性仍受大盘与风险偏好约束。我会把队列数据当中期供需背景，不拿来做超短加杠杆理由。
#三星Galaxy钱包将原生支持稳定币
手机巨头把稳定币塞进系统钱包，是支付入口级别的信号，比再发一百篇科普有用。真正落地还要看哪些地区、哪些币、费率怎么切，短期难直接拉爆公链杂币。我更关注稳定币流通和链上活跃会不会随后抬升，而不是先去追概念票。
#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
科技巨头财报余波还在给风险资产定锚，周末加密先走出独立小波动，不代表股权风险已经释放完。尾盘异动若叠加快报叙事，最容易出现「故事很满、仓位很空」的错配。我选择把财报当周一联动变量，今天只记录不追涨。
$ETH $BTC #尾盘异动 #鲸鱼On July 26, WLFI fluctuated slowly downward throughout the day, with no significant rebound. The intraday high was $0.0572, the daily low was $0.0548, with a 24-hour cumulative drop of 4.12%. The current price is $0.055; the all-time high was $0.46, with a maximum drop of 82.7%. After a sharp rise of 0.068 on July 23, the market was sold aggressively, returning to the consolidation range of 0.055-0.057. The market fell in a shadow decline, with no intention to push upwards. Retail investors who bought at the top are now hopeless of breaking even. On-chain tokens: total supply 100 billion tokens, currently only 31.77% in circulation, with nearly 70% of teams, institutions, and Trump family tokens unlocked linearly over many years, continuously adding supply to suppress prices; The treasury holds 7.3 billion WLFI, with a paper unrealized loss exceeding $340 million, indicating long-term liquidation potential. WLFI claims DeFi is decentralized, but the project contract's contract has a built-in blacklist backdoor that can unilaterally freeze any user's wallet tokens. Previously, the project team directly froze 2.99 billion WLFI tokens from Justin Sun, sparking massive lawsuits and disputes, with the market thoroughly questioning asset security; retail investors and institutions worried their holdings could be frozen at any time, leading to long-term reductions and abscondium, with no long-term capital to hold or hold them. Governance is completely controlled by Trump-affiliated entities, with token holders' voting power capped at only 5%, project teams holding veto power, completely violating DeFi consensus, and institutions continuously avoiding allocation. WLFI essentially raises funds based on Trump's political IP, raising $1.4 billion. The Trump family has locked in about $1 billion in cash proceeds in advance, and the coin price doesn't need to riseIt's not that they're timid—Coinbase's move today is too aggressive. They officially moved perpetual contracts into the US, starting with $BTC and $ ETH nano contracts start rolling 24/7, come with built-in leveraged tracking, spot prices have no expiration date. Yes, that's the financial monster that supports 90% of global crypto trading. Now it's openly stepping into the compliant market. I stared at the screen for a long time, and honestly, my fingers were shaking. Previously, if you wanted to play perpetual, you had to go to offshore exchanges. Now, locally you can run a certain institution with automatic settlement of funding rates. Isn't this basically opening a legal casino for American retail investors? CME got anxious and immediately sued to crush it. The established exchanges panicked, because once perpetual contracts are implemented, who would still play traditional futures? ？ There's no expiration date, no need to repeatedly move positions; liquidity absorbed in an instant. I actually think the more urgent CME is, the more it shows this thing is really damaging. But think about how small retail investors used to be on offshore exchanges when they blew positions, at least they could shift blame on the platform. Now it's compliant and it crashes, so it's a real blowout. Liquidation engines won't talk about perpetual sword. It's a double-edged sword. In overseas markets, it has already proven its ability to attract money and cut losses. Especially with high emotional leverage, once leverage, a ten-minute reverse direction can take you out. Compliant liquidation, on-chain battle royale, used to be a covert game, now openly brought up. Institutional entry definitely benefits liquidation, but for ordinary players, I think it's better to stabilize first Chasing the high without answering the needle should wait until the market has digested this wave of shock. Sisters, holding steady in this situation isn't something that can be done overnight. Let the big players attack first. Let's see clearly before following the #加密行情回暖. Bitcoin rises #芯片股反弹, US stocks bear#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
On July 25, Trump ordered a pause in airstrikes against Iran.
Thirteen consecutive days of strikes, with a daily battle plan review. On the 14th day, the plan was laid out on the table but not signed.
A few hours earlier, the Omani delegation had just arrived in Tehran. The discussion concerns the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. The Qatar Maritime Authority acted even faster—directly announcing the full resumption of all maritime shipping starting July 26.
Regional countries have already confirmed that risks have decreased.
But Trump's exact words were: "If you can't get what you want 100%, you will definitely consider resuming total war."
So it's not a ceasefire. It's a pause. Two words make up an entire peace agreement.
$CL Direct Reaction — Single-day -4.33%, pulling back from above $100. $BZ -4.47%。
That is, go long ...... crude oil around $100, and in the middle of the night, Trump sent a message with a gap of 3% at the open. The volatility of this product is not determined by technical factors; it is determined by a single word from one person.
Some people in the community are selling CL 10x for over 10x, costing 85.14, and the current price is just right above the cost line. This position is awkward: if it's flat, there's fear of a weekend agreement and oil prices crash; if not, fears Trump might post another message in the middle of the night.
There was a detail that caught me off guard—the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff had privately warned that expanding operations would dangerously deplete the Patriot interceptor missile stockpiles. Someone in the community put it even more bluntly: the missiles were almost all fired and had to stop.
It's exactly like trading—you're not defeated by the market, you are defeated by margin.
There are currently two core issues with oil prices: whether a verbal ceasefire can be turned into a written agreement, and whether shipping across the strait can be restored. Issue a written agreement, and oil prices will move below $90. The negotiation broke down, and prices kept rising above $100.
Some community views suggest that the roots are in the midterm elections in November. Oil prices push up inflation, inflation drives up prices, and prices affect votes. "All policies are for votes, every market movement is emotional fluctuations"—this statement may not sound flattering, but it is powerful enough to explain.
$CL At the $100 level, everything depends on Trump's message, so technical pricing is impossible. Before the weekend negotiations are finalized, don't bet on direction.
Whether Oman can reach a written agreement in negotiations over the weekend, and the actual implementation of Qatar's maritime resumption—these two issues will be directly priced into the opening price of CL/BZ during Monday's Asian session. Just keep an eye on it.
Without an agreement, airstrikes could resume at any time. The price of $100 for oil won't disappear on its own.
---
The above personal views do not constitute investment advice.Today is the market of "narrative remains, but capital needs validation."
Crypto prices did not crash, but ETF outflows and the Fear index indicate weak risk appetite;
The AI community has shifted from product entry point competition to skepticism about agent security and ROI;
The AI capex review of the US stock market will, in reverse, affect Hong Kong tech and crypto beta. If Hong Kong stocks are under pressure along with U.S. growth stocks, it indicates that funds are contracting in duration;
If it resists declines, it shows that Asian funds have independent risk appetite.
The forecasting market is turning into a cross-market sentiment dashboard: not for shouting orders, but for seeing which narrative retail investors and arbitrage funds are betting on.AI faith collapsed overnight. Nasdaq was wiped out, tech giants hit the earnings market during earnings season with collective backlash over AI spending, and China's DeepSeek ignited a powder keg. But look at crypto: Bitcoin didn't budge, SHIB surged 20% in a single day, the money didn't leave, just changed the table. Outline - 💥 AI Faith Collapses, Nasdaq Bloodbathed - 🛡️ Where Does the Money Escape? Dow, Gold, and BTC - 🐕 Inside Crypto: BTC Rock Solid, Memes Surging - 🧠 Who Is Chasing SHIB and DOGE? - 🗺️ Safe Harbor Logic Amid Macro Storms Today's Snapshot $BTC 64,466, +0.57% $ETH 1,884, +1.06% $QQQ -1.12%, $SPY +0.10% $DXY +0.03%, $GLD +0.10% $IBIT -0.82% VIX 18.57, -0.64% $USO 136.69, -2.01% Dow 51,947.25, +0.46% I. AI Belief Collapse, The Nasdaq was wiped out 💥—the scene the market least wanted to see still happened. The collective rebellion against AI spending has spread from earnings calls to market shares, with the Nasdaq 100 ($QQQ) plunging 1.12% today as tech giants led the market downward. The news headline read: "Big Tech Earnings Sl."#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
Ethereum validator exit queue cleared: the door was open, no one left
Exit the channel, empty.
The data on the beaconcha.in is cold: the exit queue resets to zero, you can unlock it anytime, and the funds arrive instantly.
Meanwhile, 2.48 million ETH are lining up to enter the market, stuck at the entrance, waiting an average of 43 days.
Half a year ago, this channel was blocked with 2.6 million coins, causing a stir in the market. Now that the escape route is open, no one is taking that step.
Two streams of people once brushed past each other in the passage, bidding farewell and going their separate ways. Now, the people who brushed past each other are gone—the old players are gone, but new players keep coming in.
Total staked is 40.9 million tokens, accounting for 33.55% of supply, with 885,000 validators online. The direction has already been cut: net outflow is reversed into net inflow.
You ask why?
Yield: 2.64%.
In 2023, it can be strong; for now, neighboring US Treasuries are 4.5%, oil prices are in triple digits, and inflation is suffocating the FOMC. 2.64% In this environment, whether you count the returns or the faith depends entirely on how you define "opportunity cost."
So here's the question: 2.48 million coins waiting to enter the market—whose money is it?
Part of it is institutional allocation, looking at ETH's USD exposure, not annualized USD. 2.64% is just a bonus; the underlying logic is "I need to occupy a spot on the network."
The other part is overseas capital, bypassing compliance hurdles and completing its layout before CLARITY is implemented—regardless of what next year's bill looks like, just standing at the node first.
The consensus between the two groups is: 2.64% are not here to make money, but to buy positions.
But if ETH's price reaches a certain tipping point, the exit gate becomes crowded instantly. Nowadays, no one is leaving—not because they don't want to, but because the price isn't at the level that makes people want to leave.
Oil prices are waiting for protocols, bills for clauses to be removed, ETH staking waiting for prices to give new answers.
Everyone was waiting.
But at least for now, the direction is clear: the exit door is open, and no one steps out. The line for entry was lined up, and no one left.
Waiting for the wind? The wind is already in the staking pool.After showering and lying in bed at night, I watched the market downward and saw BTC fall from 66,900 to 63,700 this round, then slowly recover to around 64,500. I feel the current market state is quite interesting.
Those who have been waiting for a correction for days ago may have really found their chance.
Bottom-fishing funds entering near 63,666 have indeed secured a good position. BTC is currently fluctuating around 64,500. If you follow a short-term perspective, some may consider placing a 3x leveraged limit long position, with a stop-loss at 63,500 and targets above 65,800 and 66,300.
However, from my own perspective at this level, I wouldn't blindly chase long positions just because it dropped; I still need to consider several signals.
First, the 63,666 area is quite critical because it rebounded after testing twice on July 20 and July 24, indicating some short-term capital support here.
Second, the current funding rate is only about 0.004%, with no signs of overheating in the long market. At the same time, OI saw a net inflow of about $110 million today, and ETFs have continuously attracted funds for seven consecutive days, totaling nearly $1 billion. These figures show that the market is not entirely without capital attention.
Of course, if you're not used to leverage, I think placing spot in batches is much more comfortable. The biggest risk in a contract is not directional judgment, but leverage turning normal volatility into forced exit.
Now let's look at the surrounding environment.
Last night, U.S. tech stocks came under pressure, with the Nasdaq falling 0.64%; A-shares also performed weakly, with the Shanghai Composite Index down 1.61%, and the Hong Kong tech sector also showing weakness, with overall market risk appetite clearly declining.
Additionally, escalating tensions in the Middle East have pushed Brent crude toward around $100, raising the market's probability of a rate hike in September to 61%. According to traditional logic, these factors would put pressure on risk assets.
Interestingly, BTC did not continue to weaken sharply, instead holding steady near 64,500.
My own feeling is that the market is now undergoing a wave of emotional cleansing. Funds that chased previous gains were shaken out, and those hoping to buy at low prices began to re-observe, and the market actually entered a more balanced state.
Technically, the 66,924 on July 21 and 66,711 on July 22 have connected, forming a short-term downward resistance line. Although the slope is not very large, it does limit the rebound potential.
The good news is that the support at 63,666 has already been tested twice.
Currently, BTC is trading sideways around 64,500, with open interest (OI) turning positive for three consecutive days and funding rates dropping from 0.006% to 0.004%. My understanding is that some of the leveraged sentiment in the market has already been released, unlike the crowded phase of chasing rallies at high levels.
If it rebounds to around 66,300, I personally prefer to observe first and even reduce positions in batches, rather than blindly hoping for further gains. Although the MACD green bars are shortening, they have not yet formed a clear golden cross, so there is no need to aggressively advance too early.
The flow of funds is also worth attention.
BTC saw a net OI inflow of about $114 million today, marking three consecutive days of positive gains; ETH also saw a net inflow of about $71 million. Both sides have capital participating, but BTC is relatively more stable.
In terms of fees, BTC is currently moderately bullish, with no obvious overheating; ETH has even turned negative, indicating that bears are paying the cost of funding to the bulls.
Now let's look at ETH.
ETH fell from $1,959 to $1,846, then rebounded to around $1,881, showing greater volatility and greater resilience than BTC.
Notably, the ETH funding rate has become **-0.0019%**, meaning short sellers must pay long positions funding every 8 hours. Historically, such situations sometimes serve as rebound signals.
But I think ETH's current problems are also obvious, with a cumulative pullback of about 5% this week, and market confidence has not fully recovered. So if I were to do contracts, I personally would still prioritize BTC, which is a relatively stable product.
If I want to bet on an ETH rebound, I tend to favor a light position near $1,870, with a focus on the risk level below $1,840.
Overall, I think the market is not simply bullish or bearish but waiting for new catalysts. There is capital holding support at the bottom, but the pressure above is also real. For me, the most important thing right now is to control my position size. Don't let a slight rebound make you leverage too much.
#OKX星球话题来啦
$BTC $ETH $KAITO is printing strong momentum with solid buy pressure behind it. As long as volume stays healthy, this rally has room to run.
Trade Setup:
Entry point : Wait for breakout confirmation
Target: +25%
Stop Loss : Below support zone
NFA. Size responsibly and manage risk.
#EarningsRealityCheck
#CLARITYActStalled
#DailyOrbit @OKX Orbit Historically, the best return for $QQQ in July each year was 12.55% in 2020, and the worst rate was -1.68% in 2024.
So far, QQQ's return rate in July this year is around -7%, marking the worst return in history.
In the past 15 years, only one year was negative; the other years had decent returns.
I still have a feeling that next week will be a pretty intense one.
The data will all experience significant corrections......
$QQQ If it drops a bit further, it will enter my batting and set throwing space.📊 $LAB Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $3,110.23
· 4 hours: $24,200
· 12 hours: $103,400
· 24 hours: $142,100
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $83.70 $3,026.53 2.7%
4h $16,700 $7,408.19 69.3%
12h $86,300 $17,000 83.5%
24h $118,500 $23,600 83.4%
Duokong interpretation
One-hour short liquidations dominate (97.3%), but the scale is very small; From 4 hours onward, long positions are liquidated, suddenly crushing short positions (69.3%~83.5%), with a sharp reversal within 1-4 hours, turning into a sustained one-sided decline; The 12-hour and 24-hour bullish positions remained stable at 83%, with the bullish trend continuing into the later stages. Ultimate winner: Bears—The price shows a continuous one-sided downward trend, while the bulls have cleared out consecutive stop-losses.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 2.19% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 17.0% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 72.8% of 24 hours
Liquidations are concentrated in the 12-hour cycle (over 70%), indicating that the main downward wave has exploded within 12 hours; The 24-hour total is 1.37 times that of the 12-hour period, with an increase in the last 12 hours but a weaker intensity. Currently, the market is at the end of a bear-led sustained decline, with the bullish forces basically cleared out. In the short term, we need to wait for signals of shrinking volume.
A one-sentence explanation
$LAB 24-hour long liquidations at $118,500, accounting for 83.4% of the total; 12-hour concentrated breakout mainly triggered a downward wave, with bears winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress 量化在中国已经变成社会经济的系统级变量
2026年一季度量化已占A股日均成交35%以上，日成交规模动辄几千亿到上万亿。现在量化是直接参与价格发现、流动性和波动率结构的核心力量。任何国家机器一旦意识到市场定价权有相当一部分掌握在算法和算力手里，就会本能地收紧，为的是控制权。
方星海被查只是触发器之一，他代表的是上一轮放开量化、引入做空、市场化工具的开放派路径。他一倒，原本被默许的空间就瞬间收窄。监管本质是把量化重新关进可控笼子。
摩根大通的动作是在做期权式对冲
他们今年早些时候才专门组建中国量化交易与研究团队，目标是加速电子交易、对抗Citadel、Jane Street这类非银行巨头。现在把人集中到新加坡，保留接入能力，但核心模型和人才放在规则清晰、政治摩擦低、数据与基础设施更友好的地方。新加坡已经是他们明确的亚太量化卓越中心。把不可预测的政策风险从资产负债表里剥离。真正高端的机构决策从来不是是风险调整后的预期收益是否还值得把核心资产放在这里
中国在主动放弃高效市场的路径依赖
成熟市场接受量化作为效率引擎，代价是零售投资者系统性处于信息与速度劣势。中国反复选择的是另一条路：用行政手段压低不公平优势，换取零售情绪稳定和叙事可控。
结果就是A股长期停留在“高换手、高波动、低定价效率”的零售主导模式。量化占比已经这么高了，还要继续戴紧箍咒，等于在告诉全球资本这里的市场结构优先服务于政治与社会目标，而非资本配置效率。
人才外流、模型外迁、核心研发重心南移，是这个选择的自然结果。新加坡和香港正在承接这个溢出结果
#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ Looking at the overall pace of U.S. stocks throughout 2026, no week's information density, market weight, or pricing influence can rival the just-started final trading week of July. This is truly the most prestigious Super Week of the year. Four major macro data points—the Federal Reserve's July interest rate decision, the preliminary US Q2 GDP, core PCE inflation, and the Employment Cost Index—were all released together, combined with the four trillion-dollar AI tech giants Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and Amazon releasing their earnings intensively. Macro policies, inflation fundamentals, economic growth, and AI industry profitability logic will all complete centralized pricing within a week. The more than half year of AI market debate, expectations of high interest rates to persist, and the valuation battles among U.S. growth stocks have all reached their final showdowns. 1. Market Review This Week: AI Valuation Logic Completely Changed, Market Enters a New Pricing Phase The recently concluded trading week saw a slight index pullback in U.S. stocks and deep divergence among tech stocks. For the week, the S&P 500 fell 0.6% for the week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged down 0.4%, and the Nasdaq dropped sharply by 2.1%, with growth stocks showing clear signs of pressure. The core trigger for this round of adjustment is no longer simply disappointing performance, but a fundamental shift in market pricing logic. Previously, the market blindly embraced the AI track, where as long as companies increased their investment in AI computing power and laid out AI infrastructure, they could gain a valuation premium. However, after the latest financial reports from Google and Tesla dropped sharply, the entire market completely reversed its thinking: high growth in AI has become a market consensus, and the only real concern for capital right now is sky-high prices银行业是反对CLARITY法案游说的核心力量，表面打着保护消费者的旗号，本质是担心用户为更高收益把存款转出银行。银行盈利模式，就是吸纳低息甚至无息存款来放贷获利，过去用户没有更好的理财选择，资金才愿意留在体系内。一旦加密赛道提供更高收益，这套盈利根基就会动摇，银行靠政策壁垒守住的优势，就会被打破。
法案推进陷入僵局：部分共和党议员认为文本需要进一步修改才愿意支持，原本倾向加密的民主党议员，又因法案没有约束特朗普家族加密相关收益而反对。两方诉求完全相悖，最终结果就是监管规则长期处于空白状态。
没有明确监管，新兴加密企业很难合规入局，民众资金也缺少合理的去处。银行业真正维护的不是储户利益，而是这份规则真空的现状。他们忌惮加密行业打破现有格局，恰恰说明传统金融体系，早已用壁垒困住了普通储户的财富选择。#参议院CLARITY法案下周或表决：通过利好还是夭折？ While slacking off in the afternoon, I found SHIB's performance today quite impressive, rising 9.49% in one day. The latest price is $0.000005210. If you count from around 0.00000423, this rebound is already close to 20%.
However, I didn't chase it immediately. Instead, I checked the on-chain data and felt there were several noteworthy changes behind this rally.
First, the number of tokens on exchanges continues to decrease.
In the past 24 hours, over 11.3 billion SHIB flowed out of exchanges, with an overall net flow of about -145 billion SHIB, indicating a clear net outflow on-chain. Meanwhile, exchange reserves have dropped to 86.1 trillion, getting closer and closer to the psychological threshold often mentioned by the market.
My understanding is that the reduction in tradable and sellable tokens on exchanges will indeed provide some short-term support for supply, but tightening supply is only one factor affecting prices; it also depends on whether capital inflows continue to be made.
Another change is that the destruction speed is also being increased.
In the past 24 hours, the SHIB burn rate surged by 350%; In the past 7 days, a total of 44.23 million SHIB tokens were burned, a 32.63% increase compared to the previous week. These figures indicate that the community is still advancing the burn mechanism, which will help market sentiment.
There are also new catalysts on the news side.
With ongoing legislative advances related to Japanese crypto ETFs, SHIB has been included in Japan's JVCEA green list, which to some extent enhances its compliance market narrative. This is a positive signal for funds long-focused on the Japanese market.
However, I think we shouldn't just look at the positive news now.
From a technical perspective, SHIB is still trading below the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day EMAs, indicating that the medium- to long-term trend has not truly reversed. Additionally, on-chain data shows that about 707 wallets control 94% of the supply, with whale holdings remaining highly concentrated.
Another point that's easy to overlook: although the amount of burned has increased significantly recently, compared to the circulating supply of about 589 trillion coins, the scale of this burn is still relatively limited. In the short term, it tends to improve market sentiment rather than completely change supply-demand relationships.
Next, I will focus on resistance in the 0.00000520–0.00000530 USD range.
If trading volume can effectively amplify and break through, the upper side can continue to watch the 0.000000550—0.00000600 USD area; If the rally is blocked, attention should still be paid to whether the 0.00000418–0.00000420 USD range can form the first support.
Overall, I prefer to see this rally as a technical recovery driven by tighter supply, increased burning, and sector synergy. Before a true trend reversal is achieved, I think more trading volume and sustained capital inflows are needed to confirm, so I won't change my trading rhythm just because of a single day's rise.
The above is just my personal observation based on market data and public data, and does not constitute any investment advice. When trading, you should manage your positions according to your own risk tolerance.
$BTC $ETH $SHIB
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard
#交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard My best friend said her boyfriend works at a big tech company and lost a house in cryptocurrency trading
My first reaction after hearing this was not sympathy
It opens the list of decliners
I want to find out who is bleeding today
And what happened?
The market is not crashing
BTC 64513
In fact, the 24-hour period has increased
0.71%.
ETH is a bit brighter
By around 1885,
Up about 1.5%.
SOL 74. 95
also about 1.4%.
So this is not a "full sell-off day"
It is the day of structural differentiation
Keep up with the narrative of easing and funding
First, look up
Can't keep up
Continuing to fall gloomily adds to the frustration
On Friday, the ETF still recorded a net outflow of about $225 million
The ledger is rather cold
But the spot will be warmer on weekends
This kind of misalignment is the easiest to deceive
You might think the reversal is confirmed
Actually, it's just a short squeeze out a bit
The bulls also didn't dare to fully leverage their position
The funding rate is almost zero
It was more like no one wanted to stay overnight and gamble on the direction
Names on the decline list
Most of the time, it's the ebb of narrative and the drain of fluidity
It's not that big shots are being smashed through
My best friend's line, 'Losing a whole house,'
This kind of structure feels especially authentic
When making money, I feel like I understand rotation
Only when you lose money do you realize it
What I bought myself is elastic
Not a Beta
So my judgment is
Today, don't use 'declining trend sentiment' to define the entire market
First, distinguish whether it's an index issue or a currency issue
The index is still hovering around 64,000
Individual currency killing is about crowded transactions
I only consider swapping weak ones for cleaner spot stock
Don't use high leverage to bet on V-reversals in a differentiated market
Next, let's take a quick look at the latest hot topics and chat casually:
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
News of the storage duo securing major AI orders is still circulating, with risk appetite heating up in equity narratives first, then slowly seeping into crypto risk assets. The small rise in Bitcoin is more like sentiment spillover, not chip orders directly converting into buying. I will treat this as background note on risk appetite, not using a coin to map every supply chain news.
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信, it has received endorsement from industry collectives
The open source proposal sounds passionate, and the AI narrative has already been priced up several times on the market. In the short term, the more sensitive issue is whether computing power capital expenditures can be realized. On the crypto side, AI tag coins are highly flexible and have thin logic, making them suitable as emotional thermometers, but not as main holdings. I'd rather see if there is real demand for hash rate and stablecoin payments, rather than chasing after another wave of slogans.
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
A monthly transaction volume of 470 billion sounds alarming, indicating that tokenized asset trading layers are actually being used—not just roadshow PPTs. A surge in volume doesn't mean your wallet's miscellaneous coins will rise accordingly; structured products rely on rates and basis differences. I will use RWA as my main mid-term tracker, while in the short term, I will prioritize the Bitcoin position and leveraged crowding.
$BTC $ETH #跌幅解读 #结构分化My dad asked me what DeFi is, and I said, don't worry about it, I'll help you buy it
My dad came to ask again tonight
I just looked at the board and could only give a dry laugh
Traditional markets are closed on Sundays
But Da Bing was bouncing around on his own
I quickly glanced at the message
The easing winds from the US and Iran have risen again
The previous two crude oils clearly fell back
Negotiations for the opening of the strait have also made progress
Then guess what
BTC 64513
In 24 hours, it rose by 0.71%.
The missile narrative is a bit looser
Oil prices fell first
The currency is first green
US stocks will have to wait until Monday to open and verify their results
This collaboration is a bit twisted
In the past, whenever I heard about tensions in the Middle East,
Everyone was just waiting to smash the price and put on a show
Now, pricing is more like the Xiansong product channel
Risk assets will find a way out over the weekend
On Friday, the ETF still saw a net outflow of about $225 million
The cumulative net inflow was about 81.2 billion yuan
Institutional ledgers are not so romantic
But the spot just doesn't go along with the panic script
The open interest in BTC contracts on OKX is about 31,700 units
This amounts to around 2 billion US dollars
The funding rate is close to zero
The weekend volume is also not exaggerated
It looks more like a sideways trading loss
It's not a trend ignite
So my judgment is
Before Monday's open, don't formulate 'oil drop = US stocks must rally = crypto must surge.'
Easing only reduces tail risk premiums
Whether it's real or not depends on whether US stock futures and crude oil are confirmed together
I'd rather see the reaction with the in-stock stock
Don't use weekend sentiment to leverage it
Looking through today's plate, there are a few interesting points:
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
Earnings season is still reflecting on the two reports from Google and Tesla股价从200美元跌到110美元，曾经"稀缺"的逻辑已经被彻底打破。7月底首批20%员工持股解锁只是开始，8月6日预计有约9.1亿股可进入流通，而此前真正可交易的流通股仅占总股本4%左右——供给量即将翻倍甚至更多。
对大批行权成本极低的员工而言，账面浮盈即便在110美元依然丰厚。房贷、教育、资产配置，变现是刚性需求。更不用说当前空头持仓已占流通股约30%，做空资金提前布局，等着接这些"带血筹码"。
但风险往往酝酿机会。如果8月初财报后股价出现加速下杀，或者急跌后出现明显缩量筑底形态，那大概率就是恐慌盘与解锁抛压集中释放的阶段。届时，低价筹码可能出现。我会等那个时刻。⚠️2024到2025这波行情里，山寨币的主升行情基本都撑不过三个月，随后普遍回撤八成以上。短短窗口期里只有少数人及时止盈，多数人被套，本质是把炒作故事当成了长期价值信仰。
山寨行情生命周期极短，是多重因素叠加导致的：
首先山寨币买单资金仅限圈内存量，没有外部增量资金进场；其次它属于行情轮动的末端，大部分资金早已被主流币分流；加上项目代币解锁、项目方砸盘，抛压源源不断；本轮ETF还分流了主流币资金，土狗赛道又瓜分了场内存量流动性。
后续我更看好DeFi板块，它的行情周期同样会维持在三个月左右。#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 🚀 RWA perpetual monthly trading volume reached 470 billion, soaring 450% in half a year!
This is not the frenzy at the end of a bull market, but a signal of a new track starting.
Tokenized stocks, commodities, and even SpaceX are being "perpetually" traded on-chain.
In June, just three major platforms including OKX accounted for over 80% of the share, with SpaceX alone reaching 66 billion in a single month.
🧠 My three observations:
❶ It's not speculative shell swapping, but capital searching for "on-chain Alpha"
The low volatility of traditional assets combined with the high leverage of perpetual contracts naturally suits market makers and event-driven traders. 66 billion is not a volume retail investors can generate; institutions are testing the waters.
❷ Tokenized stocks surged 7 times, who’s next?
I believe it’s government bond yield rights—on-chain interest-bearing assets + RWA compliance represent a trillion-level blue ocean. Pre-IPO liquidity is poor, foreign exchange regulatory barriers are high, so government bonds are most likely to explode first.
❸ Haven't traded yet? What are you waiting for?
Waiting for liquidity? Waiting for regulation? Waiting for a friendlier UI?
— These are all rapidly improving, and early adopters are already capturing the premium.
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 High prosperity and high volatility in storage stocks: Which is more worth watching, Micron, SanDisk, or SK Hynix?
The expansion of AI computing power is reshaping the competitive landscape of the storage industry. In the past, investors viewed memory and flash as highly cyclical basic components; price increases often meant supply-demand imbalances, while price declines meant inventory buildup. With the advent of the AI era, HBM, high-capacity server DRAM, and enterprise-grade SSDs have begun to become core devices in data centers, giving storage manufacturers new growth opportunities.
However, the recent performance of storage stocks reminds investors that a positive industry fundamental does not necessarily mean stock prices can continue to rise. On July 24, Micron fell about 7% in a single day, SanDisk dropped about 11%, and SK Hynix's Korean domestic stock dropped about 8%. Previously, all three companies experienced significant gains, but the recent pullback feels more like profit-taking and valuation revaluation rather than a sudden disappearance of demand.
AI continues to expand storage demand
AI servers require large amounts of HBM to improve GPU data transfer efficiency, and DRAM is also needed to store running data. As model scale increases, data centers will need to deploy more SSDs to store training data, model files, caches, and inference results.
Market research firm Gartner predicts that DRAM prices could rise by 125% in 2026, NAND Flash prices by 234%, and storage price pressures may continue beyond 2027. Gartner Industry Forecast
TrendForce also holds a bullish outlook for Q2 2026, expecting traditional DRAM contract prices to rise 58% to 63% quarter-over-quarter, and NAND Flash prices to increase 70% to 75%. Storage manufacturers are shifting more capacity toward HBM, server memory, and enterprise-grade SSDs, causing supply contractions for storage products used in regular PCs and mobile phones. TrendForce price prediction for $MU $SKHYNIX $SNDK
This set of data shows the industry is still in a strong cycle, but it also raises a question: how long can high prices last?
Micron: The most complete product and the highest expectations
Micron also operates DRAM, HBM, NAND, and enterprise-grade SSDs. It can benefit from the memory demands of AI servers and also from expanding storage capacity in data centers.
Micron's revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026 reached $41.46 billion, setting a new company record. The company also provided a stronger outlook for the fourth quarter, stating that HBM4 has entered a phase of high-volume shipments, HBM4E is under development, and mass production is expected in 2027. Micron's financial report for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026
Another advantage of Micron comes from its domestic manufacturing footprint in the United States. The company plans to expand its U.S. DRAM capacity, which will not only help reduce supply chain risks but may also secure policy support and long-term orders from large customers.
However, Micron's stock price has fully reflected the industry's recovery and growing AI demand. In the future, the market will not only look at revenue growth, but also on whether profit margins can be maintained, whether capital expenditures spiral out of control, and when new capacity will come online. If the company's performance only meets expectations, the stock price may still come under pressure.
SanDisk: Betting on NAND and Enterprise SSDs
SanDisk's business focus is on NAND Flash and SSDs. Compared to Micron and SK Hynix, SanDisk has less direct involvement in HBM, but is more sensitive to NAND prices and enterprise SSD demand.
SanDisk's revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026 reached $5.95 billion, a 97% quarter-over-quarter increase, with data center business up 233%. The company expects fourth-quarter revenue of $7.75 billion to $8.25 billion. SanDisk's financial report for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026
AI data centers need more than just GPUs and HBMs. The datasets generated by model training need to be stored long-term, inference services need to frequently read model files, and caching systems require larger SSD capacity. As long as data centers continue to expand, enterprise SSDs have strong growth potential.
SanDisk's characteristic is its high earnings flexibility. When NAND prices rise, company profits may grow rapidly; However, when supply and demand shift, profits may also decline rapidly. It is more like a highly volatile storage price target, suitable for investors who are optimistic about the NAND cycle and can also tolerate larger drawdowns.
SK Hynix: HBM is the most competitive feature
SK Hynix's strongest business at present remains HBM. In the first quarter of 2026, the company's revenue reached 52.58 trillion KRW, operating profit reached 37.61 trillion KRW, and an operating margin of 72%, setting a new record. SK Hynix's Q1 2026 financial report
SK Hynix has advantages in HBM products, customer relationships, and mass production experience. As AI applications expand from model training to real-time inference, the company's growth has also begun to extend from HBM to server DRAM, eSSD, and other high-capacity storage products.
But competition from HBM is intensifying. Micron and Samsung are both increasing capacity and yield, and customers may also reduce procurement risks by bringing in more suppliers. SK Hynix's current high profit margins are built on technological leadership and tight supply. If competitors close the gap or HBM prices begin to fall, the company's valuation could face double pressure.My mom's colleague spent all her pension money on Bitcoin, and now she treats us to meals every day
She kept saying this during the family dinner last weekend
"Young people need to be bold."
But what I want to say is that in this position, many people's courage has already been worn down
Funding rates show that BTC and ETH remain in bearish territory
What does that mean?
That is, the long seller pays the short seller
This shows that most people in the market are still bearish
But strangely, BTC not only didn't fall this week but actually rose by 0. 6%
Then guess what
This kind of "bearish but not falling" market is actually the most challenging for people
If your analysis tells you you should go long
But market sentiment has consistently been bearish
Which one would you believe?
From my own experience,
Follow the data, not emotions
5 buy signals versus 0 sell signals
This data is not a lie
Although ETFs are seeing 225M outflows
But BTC prices did not fall
This indicates that OTC and spot buying orders are taking over
This is a signal that institutions are quietly accumulating funds
There's also a point of psychological struggle
The BitMart incident escalated over the weekend
The CEO said he was also notified to suspend operations
The MSX founder wants to acquire it again
This chaos actually shows that some people are picking up bargains at low prices
Those who dare to take the market during panic are often the big winners
So my judgment is
Don't let your emotions lead this position away emotionally
If funding rates are bearish≠ prices will fall
Sometimes, when everyone is bearish, that's actually the best window to build a position
Wait until everyone is bullishTrump halted the airstrikes, oil prices plummeted, and $BTC actually rose
Thirteen consecutive days of airstrikes stopped just like that.
On the 24th, Trump directly ordered that no new strikes against Iran would be launched that day. Following the news, WTI crude oil plunged nearly 4% in grey market trading, while Brent dropped more than 3%. BTC, on the other hand, has risen from around 63,800 to around 64,460.
The logic makes sense—oil prices fall→ inflation expectations cool, → risk assets catch their breath.
But don't get too happy too soon. Trump's exact words: "If we cannot get 100% of what we want from Iran, we will absolutely consider resuming a full-scale war." "And the Strait of Hormuz has not yet reopened.
In the short term, you can gamble for a rebound, but set stop-losses. Don't mistake tactical pauses for strategic peace.
Let's talk in the comments—do you think this rebound can last? Or is it just the calm before the storm? 科技巨头集体回调：今天这些股票为啥都跌了？
今天打开行情一看，一片红色刺眼——美光科技（MU）重挫超7%、英特尔（INTC）暴跌12%、闪迪（SNDK）跌近11%、特斯拉（TSLA）也下跌2.2%，就连英伟达（NVDA）都没能独善其身，小幅回落近1%。半导体和新能源车两大热门板块同时遇冷，在我看来，这波调整其实是必然的获利了结+板块轮动。今年以来，AI概念股涨幅惊人，英伟达等一众芯片巨头早已透支了部分乐观预期。近期市场开始担心AI资本开支增速可能放缓，美光和英特尔作为记忆体与传统芯片代表，自然首当其冲。英特尔跌得最狠，除了行业压力外，可能还反映了市场对其竞争力和转型进展的持续质疑。特斯拉则受新能源车板块整体疲软拖累，交付数据和Robotaxi叙事暂时难以提振信心。更深层看，这是高估值板块的正常呼吸。科技股涨得太猛，资金需要喘口气，转向其他被低估的领域也很合理。宏观面上，利率预期、通胀数据或地缘因素也可能加剧了短期风险偏好下降。个人观点：短期回调不必过于悲观，尤其是英伟达，基本面依然强劲，AI长期需求仍在。真正需要警惕的是英特尔和部分跟风股，如果没有实质性改善，调整可能更深。但对优质标的来说，这往往是“洗盘”而非“转势”。Changxin hasn't officially opened yet, but long and short positions on X are already fighting. Some are preparing to go all-in on 300,000 yuan in flash loans, while public addresses have held over 13 million USD in short positions; In the Chinese-speaking region, discussions about how much profit can be made from winning the lottery, while in the English-speaking region, the pre-market contract for Hyperliquid has already priced Changxin's valuation close to 3 trillion yuan. I compiled 31 tweets in both Chinese and English, checking issuance data, financial performance, industry news, pre-market prices, and market rumors one by one. I'm not going to guess a simple answer to a rise or fall first. What really needs to be answered is: How much is Changxin really worth? How was the 3 trillion yuan expectation formed? Which high-traffic news can be trusted? After the market opens, which data should we keep an eye on? 1. 31 tweets, but the most discussed topic isn't Changxin's technology. These 31 tweets are not a market-wide poll. I filter content with high pre-IPO views or those that represent a certain type of viewpoint. Among them, 20 tweets were in Chinese, and 11 were in English or other languages; 22 views exceeded 50,000, 14 views exceeded 100,000, and 9 exceeded 200,000. Categorizing them, the results are straightforward: - 10 discusses trading plans and retail sentiment; - 9 discusses valuation and pre-market prices; - 7 discussing companies and industries; - 5 are rumors or commercial promotions. Nearly two-thirds of the content discusses price, position, and "how much can be made?" What the company truly achieves is not the traffic center. The most viewed account is the English account [@zephyr_z9]. The problem is, the latter ones🛰 金十雷达 | 21:49
主题：霍尔木兹
据金十快讯，【沙特媒体：伊朗方面称并未退出谈判，愿在日内瓦多地与美国继续谈判】金十数据7月26日讯，综合阿拉伯卫星电视台与沙特媒体哈达斯报道，伊朗已告知巴基斯坦官员，伊朗并未退出谈判，而是暂时中止了。伊朗重申了在停滞阶段恢复谈判的必要性、表示拒绝在霍尔木兹海峡开辟新航道。此外，伊朗已向巴基斯坦确认，愿意在日内瓦、卡塔尔多哈或伊斯兰堡继续（与美国）进行谈判；并要求恢复关于…
观察视角：这类消息先看是否影响油价、美元或美股风险偏好，再观察BTC/ETH跟随强弱。
验证点：若后续没有价格、成交量或避险资产确认，就按背景变量处理，不把标题当交易信号。
仅作市场观察，不构成投资建议。$BASED — RECOVERY STRUCTURE FORMING
BASED is trading near $0.08386 after a moderate intraday pullback. The present price area could become a short-term recovery zone if buyers defend support and begin producing stronger volume.
TRADE SETUP
EP: $0.0831 – $0.0843
TP1: $0.0864
TP2: $0.0889
TP3: $0.0922
SL: $0.0804
Holding above the entry range could allow BASED to challenge TP1. A confirmed breakout above $0.0864 may attract additional momentum and open the way toward $0.0889 and $DOGE $BASED .七月二十六日，凌晨五点的光还没有完全透进窗户，
屏幕上的数字停驻在64590.5与63806.4之间，像被这个城市黏稠的夏夜攫住，上下只挪动了不到一个百分点。24小时成交量约1.68亿USDT，不大不小，刚好够让K线画出几条懒散的影线。没有人惊呼，也没有人恐慌。就在这样几近凝固的行情里，一则统计悄然被刷新：十家上市公司，合计持有超过一百万枚比特币。
一个整数关口，来得毫无声息。Strategy仍然高踞榜首——843,775枚，按当下价格折算约580亿美元。这个数字本身就带着某种遥远的回响，让人想起2020年夏天微策略第一次买进比特币时的市场骚动。那之后数年，从萨尔瓦多到养老基金，从现货ETF获批到如今SpaceX也悄悄持有一万八千多枚，并在一个多月前登陆纳斯达克。比特币的机构化叙事，已经厚得让人几乎想不起它曾经只是密码朋克邮件组里的一个白皮书附件。
但屏幕的另一边，股价曲线却在讲着完全不同的故事。2026年以来，Riot Platforms上涨73%，Cleanspark上涨39%，Mara Holdings上涨31%；而Strategy反而下跌了40%，Metaplanet下跌49%，Twenty One Capital下跌48%，Coinbase Global下跌31%。持仓最多的，股价跌得最重；矿企们的涨势，又像是在回应某种对基础设施价值的重新定价。这中间的逻辑并不清晰，也不应该被简化为某个单一因果。也许只是杠杆结构、现金流压力、市场情绪轮动，也许只是夏天里一次漫长而寻常的价值重估。
外围的消息零零碎碎地流进来。比特币ETF周交易量已经跌至2024年10月以来的最低水平，以太坊ETF则刚刚结束了连续五天的资金流入，但周度净流入仍在延长——资金似乎更愿意去追逐那份后发的弹性。另一边，有地址以3855万USDT做多，持仓十八小时，最终在1%的止损线平仓离场，亏损36.8万美元，干净利落得像一场没有梦的午睡。没有重仓扛单的悲壮，也没有反手做空的戏剧性，只不过是一串数字在某个阈值被触碰后自动消失了。
整个市场仿佛进入了一种微妙的静默期。比特币的DeFi锁仓量在43.94亿美元附近微涨了0.72%，就像雨季过后湖面的水位慢慢上升，却看不出奔腾的迹象。而那个“一百万枚”的整数，本身也只不过是某个切面下的统计魔术——这些公司持有的比特币到底有多少是冷钱包里的长期筹码，有多少是衍生产品的底层资产，又有多少随时可能因为财报压力而被减持，没有人真正说得清楚。
上一个如此沉闷的夏天是2023年，再上一个是2019年。每一轮周期里，夏天总是显得格外漫长。持有者名单会变，持仓成本会变，股价的相对强弱也会变。唯一不太容易变化的，是那些静静躺在链上、每十分钟确认一次、偶尔因为一个大额转移而暂时惊动区块链浏览器的比特币本身。它们不会说话，也不关心自己是存在上市公司的金库还是匿名鲸鱼的钱包里。
当暑热最终退去，秋天的波动重新回到市场的时候，这份持仓榜单大概又会出现新的名字和新的数字。任何一个当下看起来不容撼动的结构，在时间面前都只是暂时。对于盯着屏幕的人，唯一需要记得的是：故事还没讲完，手里的仓位也还没有落定，而历史从不给出保证。Trump's $1.4 billion crypto income is killing the CLARITY Act
The bill can't pass, and the culprit is Trump himself
The CLARITY Act most likely won't make it before the August recess.
It's not a technical issue, nor a vote count issue; it's Trump's own $1.4 billion crypto income stuck in the way.
Bloomberg reported today: Trump earned about $1.4 billion from meme coins and token businesses, which has now become the biggest obstacle to passing the bill. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethics rules—the president can't issue tokens while legislating under his own government's regulation.
The Republicans only have 53 seats in the Senate, so to reach 60 votes, they need to bring at least 7 Democrats on board. But the Democrats are holding onto Trump's crypto income, causing a deadlock.
On Polymarket, the probability of passage has dropped from 74% in May to about 33%. The market is voting with money.
The irony is that the TRUMP coin issued by Trump himself has now become the stumbling block preventing him from pushing the crypto bill forward. The coin you issued is blocking your own bill.
This drama is still unfolding. But one thing is certain: the bill most likely won't pass before the August recess.
Discuss in the comments: do you think Trump will sell his coins for the bill, or would he rather keep them even if the bill fails? $BTC $ETH 7月26日｜BTC数据晚报
BTC行情
BTC报 64,450美元附近，日内最高约 64,566美元、最低约 64,028美元，24小时上涨约 0.8%。价格继续围绕64,000—65,000美元震荡，尚未摆脱近期整理区间。
ETF资金
7月24日，美国现货BTC ETF合计净流出约 2.401亿美元，连续第二个交易日净流出；7月23日至24日累计净流出约 4.652亿美元。
此前连续7个交易日的资金回流已经中断，机构资金短期由连续流入转为连续撤出。
链上筹码（地址口径）
按7月25日至26日连续快照计算：
10 BTC以下：净减少约 65 BTC，最新总持仓约 347.22万 BTC
10—100 BTC：净增加约 182 BTC，最新总持仓约 423.24万 BTC
100 BTC以上：净增加约 108 BTC，最新总持仓约 1,235.42万 BTC
100 BTC以上内部变化：
100—1,000 BTC：净减少约 1,904 BTC
1,000—10,000 BTC：净增加约 1,878 BTC
10,000—100,000 BTC：净增加约 134 BTC
100,000 BTC以上：基本不变
100 BTC以上总持仓仅增加108 BTC，但内部迁移明显，主要表现为100—1,000 BTC档减少，1,000 BTC以上档位增加。
交易所BTC
最新公开快照显示，全交易所BTC余额约 270.32万枚，净流量约为 净流出3,075 BTC。
交易所余额仍处于净流出状态，与ETF连续两日净流出形成分化：链上可售筹码减少，但传统资金渠道短期转弱。
合约数据
BTC合约未平仓量约 485.3亿美元，24小时合约成交约 196.96亿美元，现货成交约 11.24亿美元，BTC合约爆仓约 636.6万美元。
未平仓量仍处于较高水平，但周末成交和爆仓规模均不大，市场暂时没有出现明显的集中去杠杆。
今日重要消息
下周美联储、日本央行和英国央行将陆续公布利率决定。与此同时，中东局势推动油价升至每桶100美元附近，能源价格重新推高通胀预期，市场开始增加对进一步加息的押注。高油价与高利率预期仍是BTC近期最重要的外部压力。
BitMart宣布结束九年运营，8月26日停止全部交易，2027年1月31日正式关闭；这是继BitMEX之后，一周内第二家交易平台宣布退出。BitMart此前报告的24小时成交约16亿美元，连续出现交易所关闭，可能继续影响市场对中小平台的信任和资金集中趋势。
俄罗斯最大银行Sberbank计划在12月前建立加密交易及托管基础设施。俄罗斯新的加密交易、托管和结算规则将于9月生效，说明大型传统银行继续进入受监管的加密资产服务领域，但短期对BTC资金面的直接影响有限。
接下来主要看
BTC能否重新站稳65,000美元，并突破近期66,000美元附近压力。
ETF周一开盘后能否恢复净流入，还是连续流出进一步扩大。
交易所BTC是否继续净流出，同时100—1,000 BTC地址能否停止减少。
油价若继续维持在100美元附近，并推动美债收益率上升，BTC的宏观压力仍难明显缓解。
$BTC #星球日报 Bitcoin liquidity concentration: The altcoin season has not yet arrived; funds are circulating among a few coins
Has the current market formed a sustainable bullish structure, or is it driven solely by local leverage?
Core Fact: The original post clearly stated that the current market is not in an upward trend across the market, but rather liquidity circulating among limited coins. Funds are concentrated in a few tokens such as BTC, JELLYJELLY, OPG, SLX, LAB, BSB, ALLO, and CHIP, while a large number of altcoins like BEAT, EDGE, COAI, TRUMP, and RAVE are losing momentum. ETH, SOL, TAO, WLD, HYPE, DOGE, and ZEC are regarded as structural pillars, corresponding respectively to institutional capital, high beta risk appetite, AI narrative, risk appetite indicators, and retail investor rally pursuit.
Market structure changes: The core contradiction in current pricing is that BTC maintains liquidity anchoring at high levels, but the altcoins as a whole have not formed a synchronized rise. This has led to divergence in funding rates: BTC perpetual contract funding rates remain positive, but most altcoins have funding rates close to zero or even turned negative, indicating that leverage is more concentrated on BTC, with little sustained long position accumulation on the altcoin side. On the basis side, the BTC futures premium structure (Contango) still exists, but the margin has narrowed, suggesting the market is becoming more conservative in its outlook for forward gains.
Pricing transmission path: If BTC continues to consolidate sideways at the current level, it will be difficult for funds to spread outward to altcoins, because once liquidity is absorbed by BTC, altcoins will need to rely on lower valuations or stronger narratives to attract incremental capital. Conversely, if BTC experiences a significant pullback, it could trigger a bullish stamp, leading to concentrated leveraged liquidations and dragging down mainstream coins like ETH and SOL, resulting in a systemic correction. Among altcoins, highly liquid assets like JELLYJELLY and OPG may remain relatively strong during BTC consolidation, but stalled coins like BEAT and EDGE are likely to continue falling if they fail to receive new capital injections.
Biased bullish path and conditions: If the BTC funding rate remains positive and the basis widens again, it indicates that leveraged long positions continue to increase positions, and the market may be entering a localized trend continuation. At this point, it is important to observe whether JELLYJELLY, OPG, and others are experiencing sustained rallies after increased trading volume, and whether the stagnant coins are bottoming out with increased volume and stabilizing the decline. Bearish path and conditions: If BTC's funding rate quickly turns negative or the basis narrows below parity, it suggests that bull confidence is breaking down and may trigger chain liquidations. At the same time, be wary of the accelerated decline of stagnant coins, which could lead to a collapse in overall risk appetite on the counterfeit side.
Risk warning: The current market structure heavily relies on BTC liquidity anchorage. If BTC loses key support levels, it could trigger market-wide deleveraging. If stagnant coins continue to shrink in volume, it will be difficult to form an effective rebound.
$BTC $ETH $SOL $HYPE $DOGE #流动性集中 #杠杆结构 #山寨币分化📊 $LIT Quick Overview of Liquidations
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $50.73
· 4 hours: $2,484.51
· 12 hours: $5,236.94
· 24 hours: $27,600
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $0 $50.73 0%
4h $2,428.02 $56.50 97.7%
12h $5,022.43 $214.50 95.9%
24h $13,600 $14,000 49.3%
Duokong interpretation
Short liquidation in 1 hour was $50.73, long position was zero, very small scale; 4-hour and 12-hour long liquidations continue to crush short positions (accounting for 95.9%~97.7%), with prices continuing to fall; However, within 24 hours, short liquidations at $14,000 narrowly overtook the market (accounting for 50.7%), reversing the direction within 12-24 hours and turning into a short squeeze and upward trend. Ultimate winner: Bulls—showing a pattern of "early long selling→ closing short reversal."
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.18% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 9.0% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 18.97% of 24 hours
The distribution of liquidations is obvious: the first 12 hours accounted for only 18.97%, while the 24-hour total volume is 5.27 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating that short squeezes surged fiercely between the 12-24 hours (about $22,400 in the last 12 hours, accounting for 81.0% of the whole day). Currently, the market is in the stage of a short squeeze outbreak, with concentrated liquidations on short positions and closing sessions, so attention should be paid to its sustainability.
A one-sentence explanation
$LIT 24-hour short liquidation $14,000, accounting for 50.7% of the total, reversed direction, and the bulls ultimately prevailed.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress