Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
162美元的NVDA,你敢接飞刀吗? 董事会要查黄仁勋,11月17日财报倒计时,NVDA从243砸到162,RSI跌到20——你手里的多单,是在抄AI的底,还是在赌CEO的命? 先看表面:极度超卖,但砸盘的不是芯片。 币安NVDAUSDT永续现在161-162美元,24小时低点153.7、高点178.6,上下25刀跟玩一样。从243跌下来,回撤超30%,日线RSI已经干到20-30的极度超卖区。成交量放大,持仓量上升,资金费率偏多——抄底的人挤进来了,但波动也放大了。 第一件事:这轮跌的不是AI逻辑,是“黄仁勋风险”。 媒体爆出来的东西,你自己看: 董事会已经启动独立调查,请了前检察官。查什么?跟下属高管的关系,跟Alice Huang的关系,还有芯片出口相关指控。媒体报道董事会讨论黄仁勋的去留,盘后一度暴跌8-10%。 Baird罕见下调到中性,大幅下调目标价。Morgan Stanley维持超配,但把NVDA从Top Pick里拿掉了。部分观点更狠:公司没有明确的继任计划。 市场第一次给“没有黄仁勋的英伟达”定价。这才是最狠的利空。 以前你买NVDA,默认黄仁勋永远在,CEO风险是免费送的。现在董事会把这项风险从0调成了正数。估值模型里多了一项:黄仁勋折价。 英伟达的护城河是CUDA,今晚的护城河是黄仁勋的律师。 第二件事:基本面没崩,但市场现在不看基本面。 我说句难听的:NVDA的生意,好得离谱。 上一季度营收962亿美元,同比翻倍多;毛利率75%,净利率60%+;数据中心是发动机。Vera Rubin开始出货,AWS这些大客户部署计划强劲,公司自己给下一财年70%的增长展望。TTM市盈率22倍,市值4万亿,分析师共识目标价还在300附近。 基本面没崩,崩的是信仰。估值便宜,便宜不过恐慌。 现在市场交易的不是“AI需求行不行”,是“黄仁勋还在不在”。你拿计算器算PE,庄家拿放大镜看董事会调查报告。这就是短期最恶心的地方:逻辑和情绪打架,情绪赢。 第三件事:技术面超卖,但财报是照妖镜。 日线周线都是明确下跌趋势,价格跌破20/50/200日均线,均线全在上方压着。现在测试52周低点164附近,MACD空头但有点钝化。 支撑:160-165(当前附近)→ 155-158 → 150-145(周线更深支撑) 阻力:170-175(前支撑转阻力)→ 180-185 → 200附近(均线密集区) 160-165如果有效失守,可能加速下探;守住并出现下影线/放量止跌,才有超卖反弹的资格。 但别忘了:11月17日盘后Q3财报,共识EPS约2.47美元、营收约108.8-109B,公司指引约108B±2%。市场盯的是指引和数据中心需求,不是过去那个季度。 多空对决,你自己看 一边是: 日线RSI 20-30,极度超卖,技术性反弹需求强 基本面仍硬:营收翻倍、毛利75%、Vera Rubin出货、AWS部署强 估值回落,TTM PE约22倍,分析师目标价仍多在300附近 160-165是关键支撑区,抄底资金涌入 一边是: 董事会独立调查黄仁勋,去留不确定,盘后暴跌8-10% 分析师下调,Morgan Stanley移除Top Pick,无明确继任计划 芯片出口/走私调查、中国大学获取受限芯片等负面持续发酵 宏观不友好:CPI偏热,12月加息25bp基本定价,10年期美债近5%,美元强,高估值成长股承压 永续杠杆放大波动,假突破和爆仓随时发生 操作策略 核心原则:消息面(董事会结果)+财报(11/17)双催化剂临近,波动会极大。单笔风险不超过总资金1-2%。永续高杠杆易爆仓,仓位自己控。 短线(1-3天): 当前162附近偏防守。守住158-160,出现下影线/放量止跌,可轻仓试多,杠杆建议≤5-8倍,目标168-172,止损155下方。如果放量跌破158并加速,可轻仓跟空,目标150-155,止损163上方。避免财报前重仓过夜。 波段(财报前后): 等两件事落地:董事会调查结果、黄仁勋去留明确信号。如果负面落地但股价不再新低,或正面留任/过渡平稳,配合超卖,可逢低分批建多,目标回补180-200。财报策略:预期已打入部分悲观,若业绩+指引超预期且黄仁勋相关消息缓和,容易暴力反弹;若指引不及或继续强调不确定性,可能再砸。建议用期权或轻仓对冲,等盘后反应再动。 中长期: AI长期需求没破,基本面没崩。若回调到150附近且情绪极端,是较好的定投/逢低布局区间。但需确认趋势扭转,比如日线站上200日均线。 NVDA现在就像一场牌局—— AI是底牌,黄仁勋是明牌,财报是翻牌。 你以为你在抄底英伟达,其实你在赌黄仁勋的位子。 $BTC $NVDA $SNDK
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
INIT at $0.12, do you dare to bottom-fish? Hacked twice in three weeks, L1 completely down, $3.27 million in assets stolen, the team can’t even provide a restart timeline—just now, the price crashed from 0.39 to 0.12, halving 60% in 24 hours. Is this a golden opportunity or a bottomless pit? First, the surface view: after the crash, some started shouting “bottom-fish.” From 0.39 down to 0.12, a 70% drop. The candlestick shows: 0.11-0.115 is the recent low, volume expanded then pulled back, RSI climbing back from oversold. Technically it looks like a rebound, but fundamentals are shattered. Do you dare to bet? First thing: hacked twice in three weeks, this isn’t luck. On October 23, MoveVM vulnerability caused $2.7 million loss. The team patched and resumed operations in early November. On November 10, the second hack. Attackers used leaked Google Cloud keys to access the rollup hosting platform, forged IBC withdrawals, and transferred away $3.27 million. L1 has been paused since that day and hasn’t resumed. Two hacks in three weeks, same project. The first was called an accident, what do you call the second? More painful: about $2.16 million is still stuck on the paused L1, unrecoverable. The team promises “full reserve replenishment”—where will the money come from? Market cap is only $28 million; filling a $3.27 million hole, you do the math on the ratio. Second thing: once the pause news broke, whales pumped then dumped, retail got hit from both sides. On November 10, after the pause announcement, price first surged to above 0.3, even close to 0.4. Why? Some bet “pause is good news, will resume soon.” Then the second hack was confirmed, network stayed down, price crashed straight to 0.12. 24-hour drop 50-60%, heavy long liquidations, open interest sharply down. Typical script: vague news period pumps to attract followers, truth lands then dumps to harvest. Funding rates deeply negative—bears dominate, or longs mostly flushed out. Negative funding means shorts pay, longs get subsidies. But this doesn’t mean bottom-fishing; it means market sentiment is extremely distorted. Third thing: network is down but the token is still trading, that’s the biggest joke. You bought a token of an L1. Now L1 is paused, no gas fees, no staking, no governance, no ecosystem. You didn’t buy a "discounted L1," you bought a lottery ticket for a halted system. The team promises infrastructure rebuild: isolated environment, least privilege, full reserve replenishment. Sounds good. But the keyword is—"no clear restart timeline yet." In plain words: no one knows when it will be fixed. The previous October incident was restored by early November. This time? Recovery is slower than usual. Judge for yourself. Long-short showdown, you decide On one side: 0.12 is a relative low after the crash, technical rebound possible Negative funding rate, fuel for short squeeze rebound exists Team promises reserve replenishment, no direct INIT loss Previous recovery experience Small market cap ($28 million), small buy orders can pump On the other side: Two security incidents in three weeks, trust collapsed L1 paused, no restart timeline $2.16 million stuck on paused chain Transparency questionable, slow recovery Small cap + event-driven, extreme volatility, could halve again anytime Key levels Resistance above: 0.13-0.14 → 0.15-0.17 → 0.20+ Support below: 0.11-0.115 (recent low) → 0.10 → lower Strategy Most people: wait and see. Wait for official clear restart timeline + security measures before reassessing. Now is a news vacuum, high volatility, false breakouts can stop you out three times. You don’t need to catch every rebound, you need to survive for the next certainty. Aggressive short-term (small capital trial): Hold 0.11-0.12 with volume, light long position, target 0.13-0.145, stop loss below 0.105. Don’t chase highs, wait for pullback confirmation. Position size 1-2% of total capital, leverage under 5x. Bearish bias: Break below 0.11 with acceleration, light short, target near 0.10, strict stop loss. Note short costs under negative funding and possible short squeeze rebound—don’t be greedy. Mid-term: Only consider more aggressive layout after network recovery, reserve replenishment complete, price stabilizes above 0.15. Before that, defense is more important than offense. INIT now is like those "hacked small coins" in 2022— 99% think "it’s dropped so much, let’s catch a rebound," but network never recovers, price falls from 0.12 to 0.05. But conversely—if restart succeeds + reserves replenished + ecosystem restored, 0.12 could be the historical bottom. $BTC $ETH $INIT

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!