Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
8月24日,DeFi板块疯了。 AAVE单日涨16.76%,报144.07美元。SPK单日涨超26%,一周涨了44.8%。ENA单日涨13.64%,一周涨了96%。MORPHO涨20.84%,PENDLE涨14.34%,ETHFI、LDO全部涨超10%。 这不是meme币的随机脉冲。 这是一场定向围猎。 资金不是无差别扫货,而是围绕以太坊生态里有真实收入、有治理深度的资产在做系统性配置。 PENDLE、LDO、MORPHO同步上行,说明一件事:这轮行情由协议基本面驱动,不是纯情绪。 先看AAVE。 AAVE本周涨超60%,突破140美元,创2月以来新高。创始人Stani Kulechov宣布存款突破300亿美元,说了一句——“流动性回来了”。 但别只盯着价格。 灰度6月出了一份报告,用传统金融的DCF模型给AAVE定价——预计2026年协议净收入约6000万美元,按金融科技公司20-25倍市盈率测算,公允价值区间80-100美元,一年目标价175美元。 当时AAVE才75美元。 现在144美元。离175只剩一步之遥。 灰度还说了一句话:当前价格仍被低估。 这不是散户在FOMO,这是机构在用传统金融的估值模型重新定价DeFi蓝筹。 再看大户在干嘛。 2025年3月,鲸鱼izebel.eth一口气买了20,000枚AAVE(425万美元)、2,000枚MKR(275万美元)、300万枚ENA(110万美元)、20万枚MORPHO(35.4万美元)。 一年半了,仓位还没了结。 一年半前AAVE什么价?不到80美元。现在144美元,翻倍了。 他卖了吗?没有。 同一时间,Arthur Hayes在干嘛?持续从ETH转向重仓ENA、ETHFI、PENDLE、LDO等DeFi代币。最近还被链上监测到重新买入190万枚ETHFI。 顶级玩家在ETH相对低位持续加仓DeFi核心资产,不是短期套利,是指向中期流动性押注。 散户在追涨杀跌,鲸鱼在一年半前就把桌子布局好了。 再看SPK。 SPK是MakerDAO生态的借贷协议。单日涨26%,一周涨44.8%。 为什么涨这么快?因为市场在传统DeFi龙头之外寻找增量收益释放点。 AAVE是温度计,SPK是放大器。 资金从ETH传导到DeFi蓝筹,再到新锐协议——节奏和2024年5月那轮普涨一模一样。 但有个关键区别:当前的链上利率环境已经不同了。 2024年是降息预期驱动。2026年是真实收益驱动。 AAVE的Aavenomics 3.0已经上线——所有协议及GHO收入100%直接划入DAO国库,自动执行AAVE回购。年化协议收入约4.02亿美元,DAO每日可回购约292枚AAVE。 这不是在讲故事,这是在用真金白银回购。 渣打银行6月首次覆盖AAVE,给了2030年3500美元的目标价。灰度说一年175美元。 机构正在用传统金融的估值框架——现金流、市盈率、DCF——重新定义DeFi蓝筹的价值。 所以,AAVE突破144美元只是开始吗? 短期看,RSI已经71,超买了。回调随时可能发生。 但长期看,144美元不是终点,是市场确认“DeFi有价值”的信号灯。 PENDLE在搞收益代币化。ENA在搞合成美元。SPK和MORPHO在抢借贷市场份额。 整个DeFi赛道正在从“散户投机”转向“机构配置”。 灰度在申请现货AAVE ETF。传统资管正在把DeFi蓝筹当成“加密版金融科技股”来配。 牛市买概念,熊市买效率。 AAVE一年6000万美元的协议收入、50%的利润率、自动回购机制——这不是空气,这是现金流。 144美元不是终点。 是机构化定价的起点。 $AAVE $PENDLE $ENA
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Everyone is waiting for Wash this week. On August 28, Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Wash will deliver his first keynote speech since taking office at Jackson Hole. Wall Street calls it "Wash's most critical window to reshape the Fed's credibility." Everyone is guessing: hawkish or dovish? Will there be a rate hike in September? But I have an immature opinion—— What he says isn't actually that important. Why? Because the market has already told you with real actions: Last week, Basset intervened to save the bond market—expanding long-term bond repos, trying to suppress U.S. Treasury yields. And the result? The dollar dropped nearly 1% that week, gold broke through $4600, and Bitcoin rose over 25% in a single week. The Treasury Secretary personally intervened, but it was in vain. Instead, it triggered a "currency depreciation trade" for gold and Bitcoin. Charlie McElligott from Nomura Securities directly pointed out: the strong rise in gold and Bitcoin reflects the market turning anxiety into a chase for currency depreciation and safe-haven assets. This is the market's vote—it no longer trusts the Federal Reserve. Three signals prove the Fed is "losing power": Signal 1: Three dissenting votes at the July meeting—the sharpest internal split in nearly 10 years On July 30, the Fed held rates steady at 9 to 3. Cleveland Fed President Harker, Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari, and Dallas Fed President Logan all voted against, demanding a 25 basis point hike. This is the first time since 2016 that the Fed had three dissenting votes in the same decision. The June meeting was unanimous; just over a month later, it went from "unity" to "division." What credibility does a central bank have if it can't even convince its own people? Signal 2: No clear guidance after the meeting—not even pretending anymore Since taking office in May, Wash has adhered to a "quieter Fed"—deliberately avoiding forward guidance, shortening policy statements, and being vague in press conferences. The market interprets this as "insufficient determination to fight inflation." Wash clearly stated that the Jackson Hole speech might focus on "macro framework reflection" rather than short-term rate guidance, implying "more likely to reshape policy narrative than to signal rate cuts." What does that mean? "I'm not going to tell you what I'm going to do; you guess yourself." Signal 3: Top capital is voting with its feet A June survey by Invesco shows that global sovereign funds managing about $29 trillion are shifting allocations away from U.S. Treasuries toward energy and physical assets. Sixty percent of central banks explicitly state—the scale of U.S. debt is unsustainable, and the dollar's reserve status is being eroded. Bridgewater founder Dalio directly said last Friday: investors should reduce bond holdings, allocate 10% to 15% to gold, and buy a "small amount" of Bitcoin. The founder of the world's largest hedge fund says—don't trust U.S. debt, buy Bitcoin. BTC is completing an "identity switch" It is no longer just a "Fed-sensitive index." Data from K33 Research shows: Bitcoin's correlation with Nasdaq is bottoming out, and Bitcoin's sensitivity to FOMC rate decisions is significantly below historical cycle levels. Bitcoin's correlation with the global easing index changed from +0.21 before ETF approval to -0.778—this is not a gradual change but a structural reversal. It is transforming from a "risk asset" into a "dollar credit hedge tool." VanEck also said: fiscal-led concerns and structurally weakening dollar are providing institutional narrative support for Bitcoin as a hedging tool. So, does it really matter if Wash is hawkish or dovish? Hawkish? Continue raising rates—the economy can't bear it, and dollar credit continues to crack. Dovish? Shift to easing—inflation keeps burning, and dollar purchasing power keeps falling. Both paths point to the same direction: dollar credit is depreciating. What Wash says only affects short-term volatility. The trend of de-dollarization determines long-term pricing. $BTC $XAU $CL #杰克逊霍尔临近,沃什能否明确政策路径

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!