Post

The same stock, Nomura sees 905, Macquarie sees 275. A price difference of 630 HKD. The institutions are in an uproar. Nomura says 905 HKD, CICC says 604 HKD, Goldman Sachs says 560 HKD, Citi says 507 HKD, Morgan Stanley says 505 HKD, UBS says 650 HKD. The harshest is Macquarie—275 HKD. The highest and lowest differ by 630 HKD, more than double. This is not an analysis bias. This is a fundamental disagreement on what "Lao Pu Gold" really is. The bulls are telling one story. Nomura says: The weak sales in Q2 have largely been priced in by the market; if gold prices stabilize, the company still has the potential to become a high-end consumer brand in China. JPMorgan is even more bullish, still calling for 1296 HKD in June, then lowering to 1064 HKD by the end of July—but still twice the current price. What do the bulls believe? They believe China needs its own Hermès. Lao Pu’s stores are located in SKP and Taikoo Hui, neighbors to LV and Cartier. LVMH’s boss Bernard Arnault personally spent half an hour visiting the store, saying "very exquisite, very interesting." Richemont Group’s CEO publicly affirmed Lao Pu’s market value at the earnings call. By 2025, Lao Pu’s mainland revenue has surpassed Hermès to rank second, with store efficiency topping global luxury brands. This is not a gold business; this is an identity business. The bears are telling another story. Goldman Sachs says: Q2 results missed expectations, with revenue and profit below estimates. CICC says: High-end positioning limits pricing flexibility; during gold price declines, consumers prefer heavier products, slowing sales growth in the next quarter. Macquarie is most direct: maintaining "underperform" rating, cutting target price to 275 HKD. What do the bears see? They see 16 billion HKD of inventory sitting in warehouses. Lao Pu’s products have fixed prices, with premiums generally about 3 times the raw gold price. When gold prices rise, this is brand premium. When gold prices fall, this becomes inventory impairment risk. Revenue in the first half was 19.8 billion to 20.5 billion HKD, up 60% to 66% year-on-year. Sounds good, right? But Q2 revenue alone was only 2.3 billion to 3.95 billion HKD—down more than 80% quarter-on-quarter. Q1 sales were 16.5 billion to 17.5 billion HKD, Q2 was a direct ankle cut. The bears say: The luxury story can’t continue in the face of weak consumption. My view? Both sides are right, but on different time horizons. Long term, China needs a domestic luxury brand. Lao Pu has this DNA—traditional craftsmanship, top mall locations, 82.4% penetration among high-net-worth customers overlapping with the five major international luxury brands. LVMH’s boss personally visiting the store is no coincidence. Short term, triple pressure: 16 billion HKD inventory, gold price down over 20% from January highs, weak consumption. Q2 results fell off a cliff quarter-on-quarter—not a "slowdown," but free fall. More painful is: Lao Pu sells "gold + craftsmanship + brand," but recyclers only recognize "gold." The necklace you paid 3 times premium for, when recycled, is only valued at market price minus 100 HKD. Buying is luxury; selling is raw material. This gap is Lao Pu’s core contradiction. Lao Pu’s current P/E ratio has dropped from about 50 times to around 12 times—on par with traditional gold stores like Chow Tai Fook and Lao Feng Xiang. The market is voting with its feet: no matter how good your story sounds, I’ll price you like a gold store first. So the question is—if gold prices really rise back to 4900 USD (Goldman Sachs’ year-end target), will Lao Pu rise with it, or continue to fall and not follow the rise? Year-to-date, gold has risen 1.3%, Lao Pu has fallen 46%. It has indeed broken the fate of moving with gold prices—just in the opposite direction. $BTC $XAU $XAUT