Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
CME FedWatch最新数据:9月加息25个基点的概率,86.5%。 核心CPI月率0.3%,高于预期的0.2%。两年期美债收益率跳升到4.42%以上。高盛临阵改口,从“按兵不动”改成“预计加息25bp”。 市场已经把加息写进K线里了。 然后Killa发了条推文,就一句话的意思: “大多数宏观叙事只是干扰。BTC在原因变得明显之前,就已经开始移动了。” 一边是86%的定价,一边是“别看了”。 谁对? 先搞清楚Killa是谁。 4月中旬,他在74,688美元做空比特币。6月5日市场全面下跌时反手做多。2025年5月他预判了本轮牛市顶点。 这不是一个嘴炮型KOL。这是一个用仓位说话的人。 他说宏观是噪音,不是在装逼。他是在告诉你:你盯着CPI数据和点阵图做交易的时候,价格已经走完了。 相关性是滞后的。市场不是因为大多数人理解了才移动的——大多数人是因为市场移动了,才以为自己理解了。 但86%和“噪音论”,其实不矛盾。 这是大多数人没想明白的地方。 86%的加息概率,意味着什么?意味着加息这件事已经被定价了。美联储周三加不加25bp,对市场来说已经不是新闻。新闻是别的东西。 真正的问题从来不是“加不加息”。 是“加息之后,沃什说什么”。 如果他加完息补一句“这是单次行动”,市场会瞬间把“紧缩周期重启”的恐惧定价全部吐出来。空头回补能把BTC拉回78,000甚至更高。高盛自己在报告里都承认:市场预期加息概率接近90%的情况下,美联储如果不加息,“反而会引发市场剧烈波动”。 伤害你的从来不是加息本身。是你因为恐惧加息,在错误的位置交出了筹码。 所以FOMC前夜,普通人到底该干嘛? 三个原则,说人话: 一,别在决议前重仓押方向。 86%的概率不是给你加杠杆用的。剩下那13.5%如果兑现,你的仓位直接归零。 二,看FOMC之后价格的反应,而不是决议本身。 如果加息落地、沃什鹰派,BTC不跌反涨——那就是Killa说的“价格先于原因移动”。这个信号,比点阵图值钱一百倍。 三,76,380美元是当前的技术生死线。 这是BTC从6月低点57,766涨到8月高点82,130的38.2%斐波那契回撤位。跌破这里,下一个目标是72,820。别在76,380上方满仓,给自己留一颗子弹。 86%的加息概率,意味着市场已经准备好了。 真正会伤害你的,不是加息本身,而是你因为恐惧加息,在错误的位置交出了筹码。 $BTC $ETH $FIL #本周FOMC揭晓,加息能否落地?
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
At 2 a.m. on September 17, the Federal Reserve will announce its interest rate decision. CME data is clear: an 86.2% chance of a rate hike. Goldman Sachs has shifted from "no change" to "expecting a rate hike," with 16 out of 20 analysts betting on a September hike. The market has no more disagreements. But have you ever thought about this question— What happened after 16 consecutive rate hikes in 1988? Citigroup's latest report compares the current macro environment to 1988-1989. Similarity is "significantly increasing." Back then, the Fed started raising rates consecutively 16 times from March 1988, pushing rates from 6.75% all the way to 9.8125%. And then? The economy slowed, policy shifted, and a rate cut cycle began. Asset prices entered a new upward phase. This is the key that everyone overlooks—the extreme of tightening is the eve of easing. Another detail in the Citigroup report is worth noting: despite rising market concerns, Citigroup's macro model still stays within the "normal" range and hasn't slipped into "financial conditions tightening." Meanwhile, the model raised the equity overweight ratio from 2.8% to 4.0%. In plain language: Citigroup quietly increased risk asset positions amid the rate hike panic. How much is BTC now? Just over 76,000. It has retraced nearly 40% from the all-time high of 128,198 USD. Market cap is just over 1.3 trillion, funding rates are slightly negative, and bearish sentiment is growing. In other words—the market has fully priced in the "extended rate hike cycle." If everyone has already priced in "rate hikes," then what is the real catalyst? Any signal that the "rate hike cycle is shorter than expected." A hint of a pause, a wording change like "future path depends on data," or even a subtle dot adjustment on the dot plot— For BTC, any of these could be the trigger. This is not analysis; it’s common sense in trading markets: when bad news is fully priced in, it becomes good news. Of course, contrarian thinking does not mean blind optimism. If the dot plot shows room for rate hikes in 2027, or if energy prices continue to surge, BTC could still drop further to 72,000 or even 70,000. The premise of contrarian thinking is—position management first. Don’t get wiped out before dawn. The people who raised rates 16 times in 1988 are the same ones who started cutting in 1989. The Fed will never tighten forever. The question is, can you survive until the day it turns? $BTC $ETH $ZEC #本周FOMC揭晓,加息能否落地?

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!